Good morning, Ladies and Gentlemen, and welcome to the Cooper Standard third quarter 2021 earnings conference call. During the presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Following company prepared comments, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. At that time, if you have a question, you will need to press Star followed by the number one key. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded and the webcast will be available on the Cooper Standard website for replay later today. I would now like to turn the call over to Roger Hendriksen, Director of Investor Relations. Thanks, Vic, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you spending some time with us this morning. The members of our leadership team who will be speaking with you on the call this morning are Jeff Edwards, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and John Banas, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Before we begin, I need to remind you that this presentation contains forward-looking statements. While they are made based on current factual information and certain assumptions and plans that management currently believes to be reasonable, these statements do involve risks and uncertainties. For more information on forward-looking statements, we ask that you refer to slide three of this presentation and the company statements included in periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. This presentation also contains non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to their most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in the appendix to the presentation. With those formalities out of the way, I'll turn the call over to Jeff Edwards. Thanks, Roger. Good morning, everyone. We appreciate this opportunity to review our third quarter results and provide an update on our ongoing strategic initiatives and the outlook. To begin, on slide five, we provide some highlights or key indicators of how our operations performed in the quarter. We continue to perform at world-class levels in delivering quality products and services to our customers and keeping our employees safe. At the end of the quarter, 98% of our customer scorecards for product quality were green and 96% were green for launch. Most importantly, the safety performance of our plants continues to be outstanding. In the third quarter, our total safety incident rate was just 0.46 per 200,000 hours worked, well below the world-class rate of 0.57. I would like to specifically recognize and thank our teams at the 28 Cooper Standard plants that have maintained a perfect safety record of zero reported incidents for the first nine months of the year. We are continually striving for zero safety incidents at all of our plants and facilities, and the dedicated, focused employees at those 28 locations are leading the way and continue to demonstrate that achieving our goal of zero incidents is possible. Despite lower than expected production volumes, our manufacturing operations and purchasing team were able to deliver $8 million in savings through lean initiatives and improving efficiency in the quarter. Our SG&A and E expense was down $4 million year-over-year. The combination of past restructuring actions and strategic divestitures delivered $5 million in benefits in the quarter. Unfortunately, we continued to face significant ongoing challenges from volatile customer schedules, reduced production volumes, and tight labor availability in certain markets. In this low production volume environment, we've not been able to offset the widespread inflationary impacts we're seeing in materials, energy, transportation, and labor. This despite our improved operating efficiency. We're taking aggressive actions to mitigate or recover the incremental costs imposed on our business. I will provide more color on this initiative in a few minutes. Moving to slide six. We're proud of the culture we've established within our company and the progress we're making toward world-class status with respect to sustainability. We continue to garner recognition from outside organizations for our progress thus far. In the recent quarter, we were recognized by Corp! Magazine for our culture of diversity and inclusion. We believe this type of recognition is an indication that we are headed in the right direction. We will continue to work hard to further align our priorities with those of our five stakeholder groups because we believe this will play a critical role in driving our long-term growth and success. Now let me turn it over to John to discuss the financial results of the quarter. Thanks, Jeff, and good morning, everyone. In the next few slides, I'll provide some detail on our financial results for the quarter and comment on our balance sheet, cash flow, liquidity, and capital allocation priorities, and then update our expectations for the remainder of 2021. On slide eight, we show a summary of our results for the third quarter and year-to-date period with comparisons to the prior year. Third quarter 2021 sales were $526.7 million, down 22.9% versus the third quarter of 2020. The year-over-year decline was roughly in line with lower global light vehicle production, which continued to be impacted by insufficient supply of semiconductors. Gross loss for the third quarter was $8.1 million and adjusted EBITDA was - $33.9 million compared to adjusted EBITDA of + $64.1 million in the third quarter of 2020. As with sales, profitability was hurt by lower production volumes and volatile customer schedules. In addition, increasing commodity and material headwinds, higher labor costs, and general inflation weighed on our results. Tax expense of $32 million recorded in the third quarter includes a $31.7 million charge, 18.5 of which relates to the reversal of tax benefits we had recorded in the first six months of the year, plus $13.2 million of tax expense for the initial recognition of valuation allowances on our December 31, 2020 net deferred tax assets in the United States. These tax adjustments were driven by increasing historical three-year cumulative losses, which led to a change in judgment on the realizability of our net deferred tax assets. Including this tax item, we incurred a net loss for the quarter of $123.2 million on a US GAAP basis, compared to net income of $4.4 million in the third quarter of 2020. Excluding restructuring expense and other items, as well as their associated income tax impact, adjusted net loss for the third quarter of 2021 was $106.4 million or $6.23 per diluted share, compared to an adjusted net income of $3.6 million or $0.21 per diluted share in the third quarter of last year. Capital expenditures in the third quarter totaled $20.4 million compared to $10.5 million in the same period a year ago. Year -to -date, we have invested $76 million in our business, largely to support new program launches, which we expect will be up approximately 18% for the full year of 2021 and should remain solid in 2022. Despite this significant launch activity, we remain committed to keeping CapEx below 5% of sales for the full year. Moving to slide nine. The charts on slide nine provide some additional clarity and quantification of the key factors impacting our results. On the top line, unfavorable volume and mix, net of customer price adjustments, reduced sales by $165 million versus the third quarter of 2020. Again, the biggest driver was the customer schedule reductions related to ongoing semiconductor shortages. Foreign exchange, mainly related to the Chinese RMB, the Canadian dollar, the Brazilian real, and the euro contributed $9 million to sales in the quarter. For adjusted EBITDA, unfavorable volume and mix, net of price, had a negative impact of $64 million year-over-year, driven mainly by the semiconductor-related customer schedule reductions as well as customer price adjustments. Commodity and material input costs were $21 million higher, which brings the year-to-date impact to $34 million. Commodity inflation has continued to ramp up much faster than we had anticipated in each successive quarter of the year. We now expect a full year increase of approximately $60 million compared to our initial expectations of $15 million when the year began, and $20 million higher for the year than we expected just three months ago. Other negative drivers were $11 million in write-downs of certain accounts receivable deemed to be unrecoverable, and $14 million from wage increases, general inflation, and other items. The write-down of receivables are recorded as a credit loss in SG&A&E expense, was largely related to the bankruptcy proceedings of a divested JV partner in China. On the positive side, lean initiatives in manufacturing and purchasing drove a combined $8 million in cost savings for the quarter, and run rate SG&A&E expense was $4 million lower. Moving to slide 10. Cash used in operations during the three months ended September 30, 2021, was an outflow of approximately $51 million, driven by the cash net loss incurred and increases in working capital, namely inventories, resulting from volatile customer production schedules. Combined with CapEx of approximately $20 million, we had a total third quarter free cash outflow of approximately $71 million. Despite the outflow, we ended the third quarter with a solid cash balance of $253 million. In addition, availability on our revolving credit facility, which still remains undrawn, was $127 million, resulting in total liquidity of $380 million as of September 30, 2021. With our cash conservation efforts and ongoing negotiations with our customers to recover incremental costs from commodity inflation and volatile production schedules, we expect to sustain a level of liquidity that will support ongoing operations and the execution of planned strategic initiatives. Regarding capital allocation priorities, our top priority continues to be to sustain and grow our business profitably. We will continue to make modest investments in capital equipment and technologies to launch important new programs for our customers. With a disciplined focus, we anticipate CapEx of approximately $100 million for the full year of 2021, and within the range of 4%-5% of sales on average over time, with nearly all of that dedicated to new program launches. As we look ahead, another priority will be to reduce the interest burden on the company by addressing the senior secured notes that we issued in 2020. That said, we are continually evaluating our liquidity needs and overall capital structure in relation to market conditions and opportunities. We may adjust our priorities from time to time in light of market fluctuations. Turning to slide 11. We have updated our full year guidance to reflect our year-to-date results, rising commodity and other cost pressures, and lower expectations for fourth quarter light vehicle production volumes as compared to our outlook heading into the third quarter. We now see sales for the year in the range of $2.3 billion-$2.34 billion and adjusted EBITDA loss in the range of $25 million-$10 million. Our outlook for cash restructuring remains unchanged as we expect to continue our planned fixed cost reduction initiatives throughout the fourth quarter. Cash taxes should be approximately $10 million for the full year. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Jeff. Okay, thanks, John. To wrap up our discussion this morning, I'd like to provide an update and some additional detail on our strategies to diversify our business, leverage growth in the electric vehicle market, and our outlook related to our longer-term return on invested capital improvement goals. Please turn to slide 13. Innovation and diversification remain key parts of our long-term strategy, and we're making good progress in both areas. Moving to the category of good news this morning, we're very pleased to announce that subsequent to the end of the third quarter, we finalized our first commercial agreement with a global footwear manufacturer. The agreement grants the customer license to use Fortrex technology in the manufacture of their footwear products. Cooper Standard will receive licensing fees and ongoing volume-based royalties with an established minimum value. The agreement is for a 10-year term and is non-exclusive. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, we can't disclose the identity of the footwear manufacturer or the specific financial terms. I will say, though, that the minimum fees and royalties will be sufficient to offset all of the investments we've made in our Applied Materials Science business to date. Our discussions and technology development work with other footwear manufacturers is continuing, and we hope that this first agreement will be a catalyst to future opportunities in the footwear industry. Beyond footwear, we're exploring a number of exciting opportunities to leverage the performance and sustainability aspects of Fortrex technology, including reducing rolling resistance of tires. We're in the early stages, but the initial development work shows good potential. We continue to believe that superior physical performance characteristics and the lower carbon footprint Fortrex chemistry platform represents a clear competitive advantage for us in our automotive business, our material science business, and in our industrial and specialty products business as well. We remain optimistic about our opportunities to grow in diverse markets over the longer term as some of these development projects are completed. Turning to slide 14. The momentum of the electric vehicle market is continuing. IHS estimates that battery electric vehicle production will increase at an average rate of 39% over the next four years, reaching approximately 18% of the total market by 2025. We see this market transition as a clear opportunity, and we're leveraging our innovation, reputation for world-class customer service, and engineering expertise to win significant business in this hypergrowth segment. In the third quarter, we were awarded $30 million in annualized net new business on electric vehicle platforms. For the first nine months, new EV business awards totaled $88 million. Key innovations driving our success in this market include our PlastiCool family of products, which offers highly engineered thermoplastic tubing solutions for glycol applications over a wide range of temperatures, up to 150 degrees centigrade. PlastiCool also offers reduced emissions and carbon footprint, improved recyclability, and reduced weight compared to more traditional products, making it a highly desirable option for the EV market. This type of innovation is enabling us to grow our EV business faster than the overall market. Based on existing book business and anticipated future awards. We expect to grow our sales on EV platforms at an average rate of approximately 50% annually over the next four years, compared to the expected market growth of 39%. As reflected in our quarterly results and outlook, as John described, we and other automotive suppliers continue to face significant cost headwinds due to ongoing erratic production schedules, lower overall production volumes, supply chain delays and disruptions, and persistent widespread inflation. Virtually everything we buy to support our operations has increased in price over the past nine months. We are taking further aggressive actions to offset these headwinds, including commercial, supply chain, and internal cost reduction initiatives. With our customers, we're taking a multi-faceted approach that includes negotiating price increases, reduced or delayed price concessions, and expanded commodity indexing programs. We're targeting recovery of more than $100 million overall. We've made good progress in our negotiations to date, but have more work ahead to achieve the target. We believe our status as a preferred supplier and technology partner puts us in a solid position to have these difficult discussions. We are also working with suppliers to implement index-based contracts, extend payment terms, and we are pushing back against unjustified price increases and surcharges. We're doing everything we can to ensure consistency of supply while trying to limit the impact of this daunting wave of inflation. Internally, we're focused on conserving cash by limiting discretionary spending, carefully managing capital investments, and accelerating collections of tooling and other receivables. These actions enable us to continue funding new program launches and the future growth of our business, while near-term sales remain suppressed by ongoing weak production levels. In terms of the outlook, you could say we're planning for the worst with headwinds continuing, but remaining optimistic that strong end consumer demand will drive a rapid rebound in light vehicle production when widespread supply chain challenges begin to be resolved. Turning to slide 16. To conclude our presentation this morning, I wanna provide an update on our Driving Value initiative and our progress toward achieving sustainable double-digit return on invested capital. We've made substantial improvements in many areas of our business. Current market headwinds have more than offset those operational gains in recent quarters. On the graphic on slide 16, we've highlighted two work streams that focus on managing the impacts of increasing commodity and material cost, as just discussed. These work streams are clearly more critical and more challenging now than when we first laid out the Driving Value plans. Given the current challenging market conditions, it may take us a little longer than we had anticipated to reach these areas, these targets, but we are making progress. I assure you that we will maintain and remain committed to achieving the long-term goals of double-digit return on invested capital and adjusted EBITDA margins. If we achieve our $100 million cost recovery target, we could still be largely on track. Next, I'd like to thank our global team of employees for their continued hard work and commitment. I also wanna thank our customers for their continued trust and support as we work through these turbulent times together. This concludes our prepared remarks. We would now like to open the call to questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by the one key on your telephone. If your question has been answered and you would like to withdraw your registration, you may do so by pressing the pound key. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up the handset before entering your request. One moment as we assemble the Q&A questions. Our first question comes from Mike Ward with Benchmark. Please go ahead. Everyone. Jeff, first off on the sneaker agreement, is this the company that you started doing, I guess the technology development agreement with back in 2019? That's probably about right, Mike. I think it's been a couple years now that we've been. Couple years. I've been working with this particular one. We've had several, but this particular one has been a couple of years, yes. What do you think the timing is of when you would see revenue show up in your financial statements? Yeah, without disclosing product plans that they have, Mike, it's difficult to get into that conversation. Probably in the neighborhood of 12-18 months from now is the production outlook. Okay. The nature of the agreement, it's 100% margin, right? It's just straight cash. There's no cost to it? Yeah, we'll get into more of those details in the fourth quarter, but that's directionally correct. Okay. On the material cost run, now what were the lessons you learned? Just a couple of years ago, you went through when you took a hit from some of the commodity inflation with some of the vehicle manufacturers, and I think you were largely successful getting some of that back in your commercial negotiations. Is it easier this time, or are there any lessons learned, or, you know, how does that work through? Yeah, I think given the sophisticated audience we have this morning in the automotive industry, I would tell you it's no different than what you've experienced in the past. For certain customers where we don't have a business that's ready to be sourced to us over the course of the next several months, they tend to have conversations probably in a way that you and I would hope for. For customers that we have new business coming at us over the next several months, those conversations aren't quite as joyful. Somewhere in between, we'll work it out and I would anticipate that over the next month or two, for the most part anyway, we'll know exactly where we'll end up. By the end of the year, I think we'll give you some real concrete direction in those regards. It's a tough time we're in. Obviously, our customers are too, and we're all trying to work through it together. With new contracts that come on, are they gonna be more the traditional supplier pass-through type agreements, or are you kinda stuck with these legacy type agreements? Well, for new programs, obviously, we're able to price at the current commodity rate, and indexing is part of what we do. Okay. Your question really is in the rearview. It's whatever we had is what we have, and we're trying to Yeah. Yeah. negotiate, you know, the best we can. If they agree to put indexing in, as the train has already left the station, sometimes those are good deals, sometimes those aren't good deals, and you just have to take it sort of one at a time by customer. Right. Now, John, you mentioned that these senior notes, the no-call provision expires, I think it's mid-2022, correct? Yeah. Mike, it's June first is the first opportunity for the non-call date. Yep. Okay. Do you have to call all the notes, or can you call part of them? Is there a minimum cash balance you think you need to go forward with cash or, you know, credit facilities? Cash on the balance sheet. Yeah, Mike, I think I got the gist of that question. You broke up a little bit at the end. Let me start with the minimum cash. You know, what I've said in the past and what we're still kind of thinking is a good level is that we're comfortable in something in the range of $150 million-$180 million of cash on hand. You know, we still have the access to our revolving credit facility, which we have not tapped into at this point. We think that's the minimum cash required to run the business going forward. As far as the non-call date, you know, you can do partial, but you know, our intent is to look at that 13% really expensive debt. Yeah. See what we can do to take out all of it. We'll keep you up to date on developments here over the next six months as we look at the opportunities within the capital markets. Perfect. Thanks, John Banas. Thanks, Jeff Edwards. Our next question comes from Ryan Sigdahl with Baird. Please go ahead. Good morning. I guess my first question is, you know, can you help us get a sense of the timing of the $100 million plus of raw material recoveries that you're in discussions with your customers? This is Jeff. We've asked for recoveries starting October first, to be clear. Obviously, we can ask whatever we want to, and we're in the stage of negotiation where in some cases we've achieved that, in other cases, the negotiations are still ongoing, Ryan. That's why I mentioned I do believe that by the end of the calendar year, so by the end of the fourth quarter for us, we will have a very good idea of where each of these negotiations will take out. That's probably the real gist of the question was, do you have any of this in your guidance for the rest of this year? The answer is we do not. Okay. That is helpful. How should we be thinking about these recoveries? Is it sort of just a flat amount, or are you changing some of the structure of the contracts where you're now more index-based rather than a fixed price base? It's a combination. Each customer is different. In some cases, we already have indexing with certain customers on certain commodities. It's our objective going forward that for the new business that we're quoting and the new business that will come into our company in the future years, indexing is what we want to do. For a lot of the business that we have in the rears, it doesn't include that. Historically, we have said 40%-60% of raw material inflation is what we have recovered. That was prior to this hyperinflation moment that we're in right now, but to give you some idea of the historical recovery rate. Great. That's helpful there. You know, just thinking about the growth in EVs, I mean, the numbers you said sound great, but is your feeling or maybe what is your exposure right now to fuel lines? I think, in your results, you combine that with brakes as well. You know, could we see some of those gains in EVs be offset by declines in fuel lines? Yeah, to a large extent, Ryan. We've given some color on this in past quarters, but basically the EV fluid systems can be anywhere from 30%-50% more content than the ICE engine fluids. So for us, we definitely want more EVs because the content, you know, even if you take the fuel line out, our content is up significantly. Of course that varies, you know, as you go from the passenger car market up to the small SUVs, mid SUVs, large SUVs. The bigger the vehicle, the much larger the content for us. We actually are going to enjoy the transition from ICE to hybrid to battery electric vehicle in the segment. Hybrid actually is doubling because obviously you've got two powertrains that you're managing from a fluid point of view. The good news when you move into EVs that number goes up substantially as well. Obviously, we're working with customers to improve the efficiency of those systems. As we go forward, we'll have a lot more insight for you on the specifics of the content per vehicle on some of these as we get closer to launch. Great. Just two more. Just you didn't provide any update on free cash flow. How much cash, if any, do you expect to burn in the fourth quarter? Yeah, Ryan, I'll take that one. This is John Banas. We do expect a modest free cash outflow in Q4, you know, just given the nature of production levels. You know, with the reduced losses that we would anticipate in Q4 on higher volumes, that'll be mitigated somewhat. Keep in mind, we do have a significant interest cash coupon due effectively December first coming up, so that's $30 million of cash going out the door. We should see some favorable working capital benefits to offset that. With the guidance, you can squeeze the math on capital expenditures are worth about another $25 million for the year. As Jeff Edwards described earlier, you know, we're looking at all discretionary spending. We're managing the capital expenditure area. Part of these customer negotiations are looking at tooling and other outstanding receivables to see if we can get accelerated payment terms on those. Then on the supply side, also looking to extend days payable outstanding as we renegotiate some of these contracts. All told, in the short term here in Q4 should result in a modest free cash outflow. Okay. Then just finally, you know, as we think about next year and the refinancing of the 13% notes, you know, you're gonna probably have to address the Term Loan B at the same time. How are you thinking about timing? Because obviously you could be in a situation where you may save on coupon on the, on the first lien notes, but your Term Loan B right now is priced at LIBOR + 200 bps. Not sure if you're gonna be able to reprice that term loan there. Just how are you thinking about this? You could have probably pushed this attacking both at the same time. Just love to get a sense of your thought process. Sure. It's a good question. You know, the Term Loan B comes due in 2023. Mm-hmm. You never wanna have that come current on your balance sheet. Clearly it's top of mind for us to look at the total cap structure here over the next six months and figure out the best alternative for us going forward. You know, I said in my prepared remarks, you know, subject to market conditions as always. We'll see how the production environment is in starting the year, Q1. If it is optimistic as the pundits say and our customers believe, then we should be in a good situation overall as far as looking at the total cap structure. For now, we're looking at all alternatives, Ryan. You're still ruling out an equity raise, correct? Yeah, at this point, you know, with the stock price where it's at, the dilution impact on current shareholders doesn't really make a lot of sense for us to go out with an equity raise and use that to refi any of the debt. But, you know, we'll keep that as an alternative, and we're always watching that. Got it. Appreciate the thoughts. Thank you. Thanks, Ryan. Our next question comes from Joseph Farricielli with Cantor Fitzgerald. Please go ahead. Good morning. First question, a bit of housekeeping. Slide 10 shows free cash flow of -$71.1 million, but on a quarter-over-quarter basis, cash was down by, I believe it's $82.2 million. What's the 11-odd million difference? Yeah, Joseph, you'll see when we issue our full 10-Q later today. We have some local borrowing lines around the world, and we simply had a pay down in some bank debt over in China. This makes up most of that difference. Okay. Thinking of cash and what you said for minimum liquidity, what kind of working capital drain or investment rather are we gonna see when things start to turn back on and have you thought about where your liquidity position will be at that time? Yeah, except when is that time, right? You know, we're monitoring the production levels as we go forward. I guess the good news in that working capital story is we have maintained a higher inventory levels just because of the volatile production schedules. When production levels do rise, you won't see a significant outflow for inventory buildup back that you would typically see in a seasonal production environment. Now we're still working to bring those inventory levels down by the end of the year to more of a right-sized level of inventory. You know, I think we ended above $190 million on the balance sheet here in September. So we'll bring that number down. As I've said before, we're also looking at tooling and other receivables to bring those collections in earlier rather than have those extend out. When the industry production levels do ramp up, you're absolutely right, you do typically see a working capital usage. I think in this case, it'll be a little bit more moderated than typical. Okay. Then last question. You know, looking at auto production, just top line isn't always a good guide. Looking at what some of your customers have idled, could you give a breakout per platform, generally sedans, SUVs, trucks, what your exposure is? Yeah, Joseph, this is Jeff. I think we've been through this a few times, that clearly trucks and SUVs, crossovers, those type of vehicles represent 80%+ of our revenue. It's a very important number. Here in North America, it's virtually the whole business. I mean, we just have a lot of content in trucks and SUVs and crossovers. As those vehicles pick back up here in the North American market, so goes Cooper Standard. Okay. Yeah, that's what I thought. Honestly, I thought your top line this quarter was down more than I would have expected given SUV and truck sales, chips going towards the more profitable vehicles. Thank you for confirming that. That's it for me. Thanks, guys. You're welcome. Thanks. Our next question comes from Derrick Wenger with Concise Capital Management. Please go ahead. Vic, I think you need to move Derrick into the question queue, please, or out of the queue and into the current. One moment, sir. Let's move first to our next question, and that will come from the line of Bob Amenta with JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Thank you. A couple clarifications. The $11 million JV, is that a non-cash event even though you're putting it in EBITDA? It's non-cash for now, Bob. You know, as we understand it, the bankruptcy process in China could take a couple years before we see that issue settle out. For now, we've taken a conservative position to put up a reserve for that $11 million. It's money that you thought you would collect, and you're not gonna collect it or is it money you have to pay out? It's money we thought we. A little unclear. It's money we thought we were gonna collect that is now subject, or is in question, whether we're gonna get that recovery or not. Okay. Then, on the, you know, the bridge, I guess, with obviously the volume mix thing is it seems almost like 40% decremental. I mean, I don't know if that's. There's a lot of stuff in there, the $165 lost sales, $65 lost EBITDA. The other two items, the general inflation and the material economics, you know, we see what they are year to date and quarter. Is there a general historical percentage? I know we're in maybe a little unusual times how extreme some of these increases are, but do you usually recover 50% of that, 75% over time? I mean, is there. I mean, clearly, you're not gonna get all of it. You know, how does that work between the pass-throughs and other mechanisms you have? You know, what percent could we assume you should normally recover? Yeah. Let me comment real quick on your volume mix observation. Keep in mind when we present those numbers, it does include customer price. It's not just the straight flow through effect of production volume changes. Okay. Keep that in mind. Jeff already addressed it by saying our historical recovery has been anywhere from 40%-60% on the commodity side, on materials. Typically, what we would do in normal inflationary times would be offset those, call it wage inflation or rent utility inflations with our cost saving initiatives. Here, with the significant levels that we're seeing in all those categories, you know, the rise in all the input costs, et cetera, is far outpacing any ability in the short term to whittle away at it through our own cost reduction initiatives. The big number I think you're looking for is the 40%-60% level. As we've indicated, we're still in conversations with our customers about how to call that back. Okay. A couple quick ones then. On the minimum liquidity, or I guess you called it minimum cash. I guess I just wanted to. I don't know if it's parsing words here, but the 150-175 minimum number, would you be comparing that to the cash plus your unused availability? Would you just be comparing that to your current cash? Do you view those two as kind of the same thing, cash and revolver availability? Yeah. I call that the overall liquidity. Okay. You know, Q4, I know you mentioned, you know, the interest payment and some of the other stuff. Your guide obviously implies zero to modestly negative EBITDA, working capital. All that, I mean, you know, that's, I mean, to me, that's more than modest outflow, and that's $50 million, give or take. But either way, and then next year, we don't know all your guidance yet for CapEx and everything. All in with interest, it seems to be $200 million, give or take. It just seems like you're gonna burn cash, fourth quarter and next year. I know you're doing some things to kinda cut costs, so you know, I guess time will tell. How, you know, how clo, I mean, it seems like you're gonna get close to that number. I guess maybe not. That's why I was asking about the liquidity. You're at $380 now. I mean, it could be, you know, down to low $200s. I just wonder if you have any thoughts on how close you're cutting it or. I know you're not gonna issue equity, but I just didn't know what other things you have at your disposal. I mean, asset sales, clearly, maybe now is not the best time for that. What other things, if anything, is out there besides just trying to cut some costs here and there? Yeah. Clearly, asset sales could come into play, but you're right. You know, you don't sell in the bottom of a market, so you wouldn't get any meaningful proceeds from that. But there are other legacy assets that we're taking a look at. There are other alternatives and options that we're looking at. We've already talked about our cost-cutting and reduction initiatives around the world. That should start bearing some cash savings here as we go forward. But clearly, that's coupled in the short term with some restructuring cash outflow that's already in our guidance, right? Right. You know, clearly, it's top of mind for us, and that's why we're looking at every single area of not only spend, but other opportunities that we could have on there to manage to that and stay above that minimum liquidity level, as we've been talking about. You know, I'm not gonna get into 2022 at this point in time, it's too early for us in our planning process to give you any color there. But just say it's top of mind for us. Okay. Just lastly, generically on Europe, I mean, obviously the last couple years, I mean, negative EBITDA. Even before that, if I go back in time, you know, margin-wise, you know, 3%-4%, where the U.S. was kind of 15%-16%. Structurally or just generically, can you tell? I mean, clearly, the simple answer is why are you in Europe? I'm sure there's reasons. You can't just leave there tomorrow. Generally speaking, Europe versus the U.S. or North America, what. It just doesn't seem like it was ever really that good. Clearly, positive 30 of EBITDA is better than - 20. Generally speaking, what is it about there that. Are you just not big enough there, or what's kind of the issue over there? Yeah. Bob, this is Jeff. I think that for Cooper Standard, it isn't about whether we're big or small in Europe. The issue for us is really on the fluid side of our business. I mean, the sealing side, we actually do fairly well, and the outlook going forward for sealing in Europe is positive. The challenge for us is fluid, always has been, and we're working through that. That's what a lot of the conversations we've had this year in relationship to restructuring has been about. There's been some cost savings taken out in Europe, but there's a lot more to go. We also sold the rubber business for hoses over there, the rubber hose business in Europe, not too far back. There's some stranded costs that we need to get out of that business as we head into 2022, and we're committed to doing that. We will be smaller, but we'll be more profitable in Europe going forward. We'll talk a little bit more about that when we get into the guidance for 2022 early in the 2022 calendar year. All right. That's all I have. Thank you. Our next question comes from Patrick Sheffield with Beach Point Capital. Please go ahead. Hi. I was wondering if you would be able to provide an update on your plan for the Latin America business? Yeah, this is Jeff. I think the conversation that we just had in terms of assets and what we plan to do with certain parts of our business that continues to fall short. Our Brazil business has been part of the conversation here, and we said that by the end of this year we would get to that conclusion. I didn't necessarily think that we were gonna have the challenges from a supply chain and hyperinflation that we're dealing with right now, so it might not be the best time, as John just said, to make those decisions. I will say this, our teams in Brazil have done a terrific job of taking costs out and managing the price as well as inflation in that market. I think at least as it relates to self-help, that we have driven ourselves, they've done a very good job. Whether that's going to be enough to push us into a category of fair return on investment, we will probably need a little bit more time than the end of this year, given all of the variables that I just spoke of. That is one that we still owe a decision on. Okay. If we could just look at the results between second quarter and third quarter, revenue was down around $6.5 million while EBITDA was down around $19 million sequentially. Would you mind providing a quick bridge on those results? It's John Banas here. I can walk you through, but the significant driver overall is gonna be the commodity inflation, the acceleration that we're facing. You know, with revenue down about $9 million or so, as you said, you know, globally that has you know, just a few million dollars of EBITDA pull through in the current business run rate, on just the pure volume and mix calculation. Then when you throw a layer on commodity inflation and other inflationary pressures, you know, that's almost you know, $12 million or higher compared to the second quarter and all-in experience, right? On top of that, the biggest other driver is that the bad debt that we reserved that we put up for the $11 million. Those big variance drivers are what's causing that outsized degradation. Let me break down some details for you by region, okay? You know, contrary to the North American market actually being down almost 6%, you know, the market production was down 5.7%. Cooper Standard volumes were up 9.6%. So it was actually an outsized performance when you think about an earlier question on what platforms we're on and the heavy weighting towards trucks, SUVs, and the prioritization our customers have there. That kinda indicates why we're able to outpace the overall market here in North America. Europe and Asia, we were right in line with the market declines. Our volumes fluctuated right accordingly with both of those areas. We were favorable in the Brazilian market, actually, being up 3% or so in terms of volumes while the market was down 5%. Hopefully that kinda helps you paint the big picture, but it's really all about commodity and other inflationary pressures and that bad debt expense. Great. Thank you. Our next question comes from Josh Taykowski with Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. If you look at the 8%-9% EBITDA margins you were doing, you know, in the second half of last year even, versus the -6% this quarter, yeah, how do you bucket that 15% margin swing? I know material inflation is a big piece of that, but if you had to split that 15% in between, you know, volumes and production volatility versus material costs versus anything else, what would be the estimate? Hey, Josh, it's John. Yeah, I'd say you're on the right track as far as the commodity inputs being the biggest driver in the variability in production schedules. Also keep in mind last year, Q3 and Q4, we were benefiting from various governmental programs around the world due to the COVID pandemic. That had favorable good news in the back half of last year as the governments were offering various types of support. That's essentially gone away and you don't see that coming through again. If memory serves, Q4 of last year, that was about 200 basis points of favorability in our Q4 results. You know, the overall environment, the stop-starts and the inefficiencies that has caused us, coupled with commodity inflations, are your biggest drivers. Got it. Just a clarification on the last question. You know, the bigger EBITDA swing overseas was in Asia. You touched on it a minute ago, 5% sequential increase in revenue, yet EBITDA declines -2% to -14% quarter-over-quarter. That's primarily that $11 million bad debt charge? Yep, exactly. It's $11 million bad debt plus some material economics. Got it. Just looking at the guide, you know, if you do the math, it implies, you know, close to $60 million burn pre-working capital. I know you said that it should be a modest cash outflow for 4Q. Maybe you've got some inventory that you're still working to unwind and some tooling, but how should we think about, you know, working capital in the context of that $60 million burn? You know, just looking for a bit of a range, I guess. Is it $30 million-$40 million? Is it a little bit less than that, a little bit more? How should we think about that? Yeah, I've given all the color I wanna give at this point, Josh, just given all the moving pieces. You know, I'll give you the qualitative aspects of how it comes together. Because of the various initiatives we've got going on around the world, there's a lot of puts and takes there. Okay. Next question, just wanted to cover, I guess, in a little bit more detail the goal for these commercial settlements. You know, the $100 million that you got out there now, how would you frame that as compared to the actual headwind that you faced, you know, year to date, I guess, in the context of that 40%-60% historical success rate? Is that kind of in line? Yeah. This is Jeff. I think the target that we put out there and the letters that we sent out to our customers reflected the reality of our business. Our commercial teams are in negotiation as we speak, and the targets are clear for our customers, and the targets are clear for our folks that are negotiating to those targets. Got it. Does the $100 million, this got asked previously, but is if you got all that you set out for of that $100 million, how much of the goal is retroactive versus you get the recovery later down the road once, you know, this inflationary period starts to subside? Yeah. Again, the October first request that went out with the $100 million of help required was based on the reality of the commodity inflation and as it was occurring within our company. Again, we didn't just make up the October first date. Each customer is talking to us about how they can help us recover those costs. There's a bunch of moving parts and a bunch of different levers that can be pulled. I talked about those in my prepared remarks. Each one of them are different. I think that as I mentioned earlier, by the end of the calendar year, we will have a very good idea of the result of those negotiations. We'll just stick to that. I don't wanna provide any more detail, any more color. I don't use earnings calls to give my customers performance reviews, so we've probably given enough of that today. Okay, fair enough. I mean, does the $100 million include anything else besides material costs? I know there's been other suppliers out there talking about trying to recoup, you know, whatever estimate they have for costs incurred for the volatility in production schedules or other inflationary, you know, labor, things like that. Or is it just for materials? All in. Everything you just described. Okay. Got it. I think that's it. Okay. Thank you. Our next question comes from Patrick Sheffield with Beach Point Capital. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Thanks for squeezing me in. Not to belabor the point, one last try here on the $100 million. You guys give different categories of where you expect to get those savings from. Is there any, like, directional, you know, guidance you can give as far as how much of it is from price increases versus other initiatives? Is it mostly price increases that would drive the $100 million? I just wanted to confirm, the $100 million is like an annual cost number, like an EBITDA improvement theoretically. Is that right? First of all, the answer to the question is yes, there's price increases. We also are very focused on cash. As I mentioned in my prepared remarks, there's discussions going on about tooling payments and other costs associated with our business that we typically would absorb that we're asking them to absorb. Each customer is different. Each status in how they would like us to address the recovery is probably different. I also tried to give you some color in terms of the leverage of these negotiations. They're based on business that we have today, but it's also business that we wanna keep tomorrow and new business that we wanna win tomorrow. Depending on where you are in those different slots of life, you know, they're more apt to help when you don't have a lot of new business that's coming your way and when you do have a lot of new business coming your way, then those negotiations are more difficult. You also know who our largest customers are. It's pretty simple. We've given that breakdown many times. You know that we've got three or four people that need to pay their fair share here, and that's what we're focused on. We feel really good about the engagement. We feel good about the atmosphere of the negotiations. I appreciate everything our customers are doing to try to help us, and I'm sure everybody else that's sitting in their lobby these days. Okay, great. Quickly on restructuring for 2021, see the guide for $45- $50 or $60. Any preliminary thoughts as to if that number's gonna be higher or lower in 2022? Yeah, on our last call, I mentioned that we expect it to be significantly lower than the current spend rate. Nothing would change how we're viewing that right now. Great. Finally, on the bad debt writedown, are there any others? Is this sort of a one-off? Is there anything else like that that might be going on in the region? Or is that fully captured? This was with just one particular former joint venture. We are obviously still in the region and managing through the challenging industry environment there, so I can't say whether anything else is coming our way, but not that we know of at this time. Okay, thanks a lot, guys. Okay, thanks. Our next question comes from Chris Wong with Barclays. Please go ahead. Most of my question is answered. Just wondering if that $100 million recovery that you're requesting from October to year-end is that included in any shape or form in your guidance? Hi, Chris. This is Jeff. As I said before, no, it's not. Okay. Take a step back in terms of, you know, your overall COGS base. You know, can you give me a sense like, you know, what is the overall raws as a percentage of COGS? In terms of raw material, I know you have, you know, all kinds of different flavors, you know, the rubber and all kinds of oil derivative. Can you kind of maybe give us a little bit more sense of, you know, what are the buckets that are moving the most, for you? Yeah, sure, Chris. This is John. The main inputs that you can kind of categorize them in three main buckets. You've got rubber is clearly the largest input cost that we've got, followed by metals and then plastics. If you think about the $34+ million we've already incurred this year and the $60 million we'll face for the full twelve months, about 65% of that inflation is based on the rubber area. Another 25% is on metals, so I think steel and aluminum in that category, and then about 10% coming out of plastics and resins. I think that's kind of the overall inflationary impact of how that breaks down. In terms of our the direct materials, you'll see in our 10-Q direct materials, as a percent of sales is about 47% in the Q3 timeframe. Got it. Mm-hmm. We don't break it down by direct raw materials, but it's more about the overall materials that we're buying, that are going into that 47%. Okay? Gotcha. That's helpful. I mean, there's a bit of a lift in terms of sales sequentially. Can you talk about, you know, the visibility to that and probably broken down by continent? Yeah. When you look at continent by continent, the IHS forecast has North America up about 7%, compared to Q3. Europe is supposed to be up about 31%, you know, Q3- Q4. The overall Asian market up about another 12.5% or so. If you kind of factor that in with our weighting of revenue, that's how you get to our overall sales increase. You know, clearly, there is two schools here. One is the IHS forecast, and then we also have the short-term customer releases that we manage to. We're triangulating both of those data points into the guidance range that you see. Gotcha. That's helpful. I think I missed on a couple of things. One is, you said 4Q, you're gonna have modest cash outflow with working capital. Is that right? Yeah. You know, I'm rethinking the term modest, to be honest with you. You know, we're gonna have a cash outflow with the current outlook, the interest load, and then the capital expenditures that we've got in front of us, and we've got a lot of positive offsets that we're working towards to bring that cash outflow down. Got it. I know that you didn't really get a lot of working capital back, you know, even with, you know, obviously sales a little bit lower in the quarter. What's sort of your expectation now, you know, in 4Q and going to 2022, hopefully, you know, into that recovery phase when your sales is gonna be higher? Yeah. I answered this a few minutes ago, right? The biggest reason why we didn't see the benefit of lower revenue on the working capital front in Q3 was 'cause of the higher inventory levels. As those come down and we don't need to buy as much in a rising sales environment, we should get some of that working capital back. Got it. Okay. Thank you very much. All right. Thanks, Chris. Our next question comes from Jared Weil with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Yeah. I think most of my stuff has been answered, but talking about like the path to margin improvement and the buckets you've identified, the material inflation coming into this year was. Right? We didn't think it was gonna be like this. And part of this, part of the improvement and maybe part of the $100 million that you'll be able to sort of bucket into that bucket, I mean, if costs hold here or pull back next year, you'll be able to catch up on your customer negotiations, and that'll sort of accrue to margins on its own, right? The other part of my question is, if we were to remove that material cost inflation, where do you think you are on all these other initiatives and executing on those to get yourself back to the margins you're shooting for? I understand that the material cost inflation set you back. How do you sort of grade yourself on progress on all the other stuff? Yeah, Jared, this is Jeff. I said in my remarks, if we get that, then we're largely back on our timing. What I've said in a number of these conversations is that 2023 was the first full year we expected to be a double digit return on invested capital and double digit EBITDA. We said as we exited 2022, we would be able to demonstrate that. That was pre all of the conversation we were just having regarding inflation. Obviously, that didn't include significant supply chain shortages or shutting down our most profitable vehicles and causing start and stop from a production standpoint that traps significant inventory costs and labor and all of that. We've talked about all that this morning. If we talk about the glass is half full here, then what we have is the lowest inventory level in the history of the automotive industry, I think. We have the most new vehicles coming on the market. We have EVs that are gonna create incredible brand opportunities and pent-up demand. I believe Cooper Standard has never been in a better position from a cost point of view internally, given what we can control. We still have work to do in Europe, and we still have work to do in China to get those regions profitable. We'll take next year to continue to work our way through that. That's been the plan. North America, we need to get these plants up and running, and I'm sure our customers feel the exact same way. As soon as that happens, the demand is there, and I think you're gonna see a tremendous result. Clearly, the raw material inflation is real. The costs that we're absorbing as a result of the supply chain challenges are real. That's why we've asked for more than $100 million of price increases. That's about as simple as I can say it. I remain extremely optimistic about this industry and about the future. I've never been more confident in our company, both in terms of what we have done to this point to set it up for long-term success and sustainability. I think we have the best talent in the industry, and I think that they wanna stay here. The culture is a big deal. The relationships we have with our customer have never been better. I can promise you that. We're gonna do everything we can to continue to deliver for them as we negotiate some of the toughest contracts that we've ever had to negotiate. I'm confident that we'll get it done, and we aren't gonna whine about it. We're just gonna go to work and continue to focus on the things that we can control, and I know our customers will help us the best they can. That's sort of the synopsis. Great. Thanks. It appears that there are no more questions. I would now like to turn the call back over to Roger Hendriksen. Okay, thanks, everybody. We really appreciate your engagement and insightful questions this morning, and we certainly look forward to future conversations. This will conclude our call. Thank you.