Welcome to the Civeo Corporation First Quarter 2025 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star and then zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Regan Nielsen. Please go ahead. Thank you, and welcome to Civeo's First Quarter 2025 earnings conference call. Today, our call will be led by Bradley Dodson, Civeo's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Collin Gerry, Civeo's Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Before we begin, we would like to caution listeners regarding forward-looking statements. To the extent that our remarks today contain anything other than historical information, please note that we're relying on the safeguarding protections afforded by federal law. Any such remarks should be read in the context of the many factors that affect our biness, including risks and uncertainties disclosed in our Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and other SEC filings. I'll now turn the call over to Bradley. Thank you, Regan. Thank you all for joining us today on our First Quarter 2025 earnings call. I'll start by highlighting some of the key takeaways before walking through a brief summary of our first quarter 2025 financial results. Collin will provide a financial and segment-level review, and I'll conclude with our updated 2025 guidance and underlying regional assumptions. We will then open the call for questions. The key takeaways today are, and I'll start with the changes we've made to our capital allocation strategy to accelerate the return of capital to investors and enhance long-term shareholder value. Under our updated framework, the board has increased our share repurchase authorization from the previously announced 10% to 20% of the total shares outstanding and has suspended the quarterly dividend. We intend to allocate 100% of our annual free cash flow to share repurchases until this expanded authorization is completed. We expect to primarily use open market purchases to execute the authorization while continuing to evaluate more expedited methods of repurchasing shares to augment these open market purchases. In the first quarter of 2025, we returned $6.8 million of capital to shareholders through a combination of our quarterly dividend and share repurchases, bringing our total share repurchases since the inception of the program in 2021 to approximately 22% of Civeo's common shares outstanding. Following the newly increased share repurchase program, we intend to utilize 75% of annual free cash flow to continue funding share repurchases. This is all driven by Civeo's ability to generate free cash flow. It has generated free cash flow and has done so every year for the last 10 years. As we've previously noted, Civeo's free cash flow has historically waited to the second half of the year seasonally. I'll now turn to the regional observations. In Australia, we continue to experience strong occupancy levels. Revenues in the business increased 13% year over year and on a constant currency basis, 18% compared to the first quarter of 2024, primarily driven by increased activity in our integrated services business, which was strengthened by the recently announced AUD 1.4 billion contract renewal and expansion. We are pleased with the progress we are making towards completing our previously announced acquisition of Aurora Villages in the Australian Bowen Basin, which will expand our presence into a new area of that basin. Upon close, we continue to expect that this transaction will close in the second quarter, and we also expect it to be immediately accretive to operating cash flow. Moving to Canada, we experience lower build rooms as our customers continue to reduce capital spending in response to investor pressure to return capital to their shareholders, as well as ongoing economic and political uncertainty. During the quarter, we reduced our Canadian employee headcount by approximately 25% and recorded a restructuring charge of approximately $1 million, which was excluded from adjusted EBITDA. As our customers continue to navigate macroeconomic challenges, including weaker oil prices, new export tariffs, and pressure to return capital and reduce costs, we are focusing on taking additional steps to optimize our cost structure and better align our business with the realities of the current environment. We remain focused on controlling what we can control. In the second and third quarters of 2025, we expect to continue to execute on cost reduction actions while maintaining a sharp focus on operational execution to improve performance across our lodges in Canada. Given our focus on enhancing operational efficiency, we have engaged a leading independent consulting firm to review the company's North American cost structure. This process is part of our commitment to identifying sustainable opportunities to enhance shareholder value, streamline overhead costs, and align costs with strategic priorities. Before I turn the call on, I'd like to take a moment to remind you of the supplemental disclosure we introduced on last quarter's earnings call and will be providing on a quarterly basis moving forward. This disclosure, which is intended to better illustrate the evolution of our business and our current asset mix, shows the revenues from our asset light business, which includes hospitality services at both our owned assets as well as assets owned by our customers, and secondly, the asset intensive business, which largely includes the accommodations revenue associated with our lodge and village assets as well as our Canadian mobile camp business. The supplemental data schedule will be found in our earnings press release. With that, I'll turn it over to Collin. Thank you, Bradley, and thank you all for joining us this morning. Today, we reported total revenues in the first quarter of $144 million, with a net loss of $9.8 million, or $0.72 per diluted share. During the first quarter, we generated adjusted EBITDA of $12.7 million and negative operating cash flow of $8.4 million. As a reminder to listeners, seasonally, the first quarter tends to see a negative working capital impact on cash flow. The decrease in adjusted EBITDA in the first quarter of 2025 compared to 2024 was primarily due to decreased build rooms at the Canadian lodges. This lower level of customer spending is expected to continue as producers in the region remain keenly focused on reducing costs in response to uncertainty in the current operating environment. Let's now return to the first quarter results for our two segments. I'll begin with a review of the Australian segment performance compared to its performance a year ago. First quarter revenues from our Australian segment were AUD 103.6 million, up 13% from AUD 91.7 million in the first quarter of 2024. Adjusted EBITDA was AUD 20.5 million, relatively flat year over year. The increase in revenues was primarily driven by increased integrated services activity related to our recent contract announcement. Adjusted EBITDA did not increase proportionally to revenues year over year, primarily due to increased power and staffing costs in the quarter. Operating cost management will continue to be a focal point throughout 2025. Australian build rooms in the quarter were 625,000 rooms, modestly up from the first quarter of 2024. Our daily room rate for our Australian-owned villages in U.S. dollars was $75, which decreased from $77 in the first quarter of 2024, primarily due to the weakening of the Australian dollar. Turning to Canada, we recorded revenues of $40.4 million as compared to $67.2 million in the first quarter of 2024. Adjusted EBITDA for the segment was negative $0.2 million. The year-over-year decrease in adjusted EBITDA of $5.9 million was driven by the wind down of LNG-related activity, including the completion of pipeline activity for our mobile camps, and lowered build rooms as a result of our customers' recent focus on cost and headcount reductions, as well as the loss of Fort Hills-related occupancy from the sale of our MacOlan Lake Lodge. During the first quarter, build rooms in our Canadian lodges totaled 359,000, which was down from 610,000 in the first quarter of 2024 due to the factors just mentioned. Our daily room rate for the Canadian segment in U.S. dollars was $93, which decreased from $98 in the first quarter of 2024, entirely due to the weakening of the Canadian dollar. Looking at our capital structure, Civeo's net debt as of March 31, 2025, was $59 million, a $21 million increase since December 31, 2024. Our net leverage ratio for the quarter was 0.8 times as of March 31, 2025. As of March 31, 2025, Civeo had total liquidity of approximately $162 million. Our liquidity position continues to support our ability to return capital to shareholders, close our previously announced Australian acquisition, and maintain a prudent leverage ratio. Finally, I'll turn to capital allocation. I'll start with CapEx. On a consolidated basis, CapEx for the first quarter of 2025 was $5.3 million, down from $5.6 million during the first quarter of 2024. Capital expenditures in both periods were predominantly related to maintenance spending on our lodges and villages. During the first quarter of 2025, we repurchased approximately 153,000 shares through our share repurchase program for a total cost of $3.3 million. As Bradley mentioned, this brings our total return of capital to shareholders in the first quarter of 2025, including quarterly dividends and share repurchases, to $6.8 million. With our newly increased share repurchase authorization and commitment to accelerating the return of capital to shareholders, we continue to believe that repurchasing shares is a high-return, value-enhancing opportunity. This new capital return framework reflects that, and we look forward to reporting on our progress repurchasing shares next quarter. With that, I will turn the call back over to Bradley. Thank you, Collin. I'll provide some additional color on the updated capital allocation framework before I turn to a discussion of our updated guidance expectations for the balance of 2025. In the first quarter, the board authorized a new share repurchase program for up to 10% of the total common shares outstanding over the next 12 months as part of our commitment to capitalizing on attractive opportunities to enhance shareholder returns. This authorization followed the completion of the prior 5% share repurchase authorization announced in September of 2024, which was completed in just six months. When we announced the board's authorization of the share repurchase program last year and reiterated it in the first quarter announcement, we also made it clear that our capital allocation strategy remains under continuous review, consistent with our focus on driving long-term value creation for shareholders. To that end, we are pleased to announce today a revised capital allocation framework resulting through our thorough review of the framework and our engagement with our shareholder base. Under our refreshed capital allocation strategy, we are rebalancing our capital return mix to prioritize share repurchases as the primary vehicle for returning capital to shareholders and eliminating Civeo's quarterly dividend to maximize flexibility. Given the macroeconomic headwinds and tariff-driven uncertainties, we believe maintaining financial flexibility is essential. As we have seen across industries over the last several weeks, trade policy changes and supply chain disruptions have a significant impact. We'll continue to assess more expedited methods for repurchasing shares. Underscoring our commitment to returning capital to shareholders, our board has approved an increase to the share repurchase authorization we announced in March, increasing the amount of shares available for repurchase from 10% to 20% of the total shares outstanding. We intend to allocate 100% of annual free cash flow to executing repurchases in the open market to complete this authorization as soon as practicable. Given the current valuation of Civeo shares and our outlook, we believe this approach is prudent, value-enhancing, and in the shareholders' best interest. This decision demonstrates our board and management's confidence in Civeo's future prospects, operational resilience, and ability to deliver long-term shareholder value despite the current market challenges and pressure on our stock price. Once we have completed this recently expanded share repurchase authorization, our plan is to utilize 75% of free cash flow annually to fund ongoing share repurchases. Our ability to take these important steps to enhance shareholder returns is built on the foundation of work we have done over the last several years to strengthen our balance sheet. Having surpassed our target net leverage ratio of one times through our disciplined focus on debt reduction and given our strong liquidity position and continued solid cash flow generation, we now have ample financial flexibility. We are confident that this capital return strategy best supports long-term share long-term value creation while reducing risks amidst a more uncertain global backdrop. We will remain agile and responsive to market conditions while advancing our objective of delivering superior returns for Civeo shareholders. I would now like to turn our discussion to our full year 2025 guidance on a consolidated basis, including the underlying macro and regional assumptions. We are lowering our full year 2025 revenue and adjusted EBITDA guidance to a range of $620 million-$650 million of revenues for 2025 and $75 million-$85 million of adjusted EBITDA for 2025. We are also lowering our full year 2025 capital expenditure guidance to $20-$25 million. To remind everyone, this guidance continues to exclude the contribution from our recently announced Australian acquisition, which is still expected to close by the end of the second quarter and is subject to regulatory approvals and customary closing conditions. We will provide updated 2025 guidance once the transaction has closed. Taking into account our new adjusted EBITDA and CapEx guidance, we are lowering our free cash flow guidance for 2025 to $20-$30 million. As a reminder, this 2025 free cash flow guidance is burdened by approximately $10 million of one-time deferred tax payments related to fiscal 2024. I will now provide the regional outlooks and corresponding underlying assumptions by region. In Australia, customer activity in our own villages remains strong. Three of our Bowen Basin villages are currently operating at full capacity, and we are seeing strong occupancy across the remainder of our owned village portfolio. Based on these trends we are seeing in the market, we expect these levels to continue throughout the balance of 2025. As it relates to our integrated services business, we are continuing to experience increased demand from our recent contract award. We expect to build on the strong increasing momentum in 2025 as we work towards our goal of achieving AUD 500 million of integrated services revenues by 2027. Our outlook assumes modest Australian build room growth as well as expansion in our integrated services business. In Canada, as I mentioned earlier, we expect performance will continue to be impacted by economic and political uncertainty. As we continue executing on the restructuring actions we announced in the fourth quarter, including cold shutting two lodges in the second quarter, we expect to incur another $1 million in restructuring charges. Moving forward, we are focused on remaining agile and responsive, and we will continue to assess potential opportunities to reduce our cash structure as we navigate a challenging and dynamic environment. We continue to believe that 2025 is a transitional year for our Canadian division as our Canadian division adjusts to lower revenue expectations driven by customers' response to lower oil prices and investor pressure. We expect associated changes to our operations will impact free cash flow performance as a result. However, we believe our consistent free cash flow generation is one of Civeo's strongest financial characteristics, and we will continue to do so going forward. Before we open the head into the call, I'd like to close by saying we are confident in our team's ability to execute our updated capital allocation framework and generate value for our long-term shareholders. With that, we'll take questions. Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star and then one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star and then two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. The first question we have is from Stephen Gengaro of Stifel. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning, everybody. Morning. Two questions for me, and you went over the capital allocation framework pretty well, but what I was curious about is how much of this is just sort of macro uncertainty on the dividend versus the internal or board views that it's a better way to create value? Is this something that you think you'll revisit when the macro backdrop becomes clearer? It's more the latter, Stephen. Thank you for the question. In extensive shareholder engagement over the last few months, it became apparent that, and also just from the trading history, we were not getting value from the dividend. Obviously, the whole drive, both with the dividend historically and share purchase, was return capital to shareholders. If it was not being valued, it appeared to us and others that shifting that capital to share purchase made more sense at this time. As we mentioned in the prepared comments, we are constantly looking at our capital allocation, so we will evaluate it in the future. In the near term and for the foreseeable future, it appears that we believe that buying back stock makes more sense. Thanks. That's sort of in line with the feedback I've gotten too, so I appreciate the comments. I think the other bigger picture question, and I may ask this incorrectly, but you had a press release out, I think, a week ago about our extended relationship up in Canada. I think it was with the Six Nations. I forget exactly, but I was curious what's the underlying benefit to that to the business, but also maybe as part of the answer, we've talked about in the past kind of the source gas for Canadian LNG, and has there been any change in your ability to sort of maybe penetrate that market? We're very pleased to announce the joint venture with the Six Nations. As you know, and I think our investors know, First Nation relationships are critically important to winning work in Canada. We have an extensive history, including being gold certified in terms of our indigenous relations efforts. This is just the extension of that. In many cases, a First Nation relationship is necessary to bid on work, and we're excited about the prospects now that we have this relationship in place and on bidding with our partners on new work, particularly in eastern Canada. The second part of your question addressed source gas. This is not related to that. Okay. Okay. Is there anything on the source gas side that has changed? I'm not even sure if I don't have a great handle, honestly, on sort of the competitive landscape in that region. Is there any opportunity there, or is that something that's too hard to tap into given the established players there? Our focus on LNG activity in Canada prospectively is really related around three projects. Obviously, everyone's watching LNG Canada closely to see if they will move forward with phase two of that project that's currently going into initial production. The second piece, we've seen Cedar LNG reach positive FID, and that's moving forward. We have a handful of guests from that project staying with us at our Civeo Lodge, but it is not fully ramped up yet. The third project that we're watching closely is the Western LNG project or Ksi Lisims that would utilize the PRGT pipeline, which would need to be built, which would be a great opportunity for our mobile camp business and prospectively, potentially, additional work on the coast as they build out their liquefaction capabilities. Okay. Great. Thank you. The next question we have is from Steve Ferrazzone of Sudachi & Co. Please go ahead. Good morning. This is Alex on for Steve. Thanks for taking questions. Just to build on that last. Hi. Hey, good morning. Just to build on that last question, given the completion of the Canadian election, are there any other larger infrastructure projects which you think could generate revenue in the next few years? I would say things that have been talked about during the campaign were potential additional pipeline work, pipeline projects where to move forward. That's great opportunities for a mobile camp business. The other big project would be pathways and carbon sequestration in Alberta around the oil sands projects. Okay. Thank you. You also mentioned hiring a consulting firm to help with cost-cutting measures. Could you talk a little bit about what's on the table, sort of the types of cost scope, and how that might develop across North America? Primarily, there's been a significant shift in our Canadian value for our base Canadian business. It is primarily help in addressing that cost structure. Generally speaking, it will address all North American cost structure. Okay. Thank you. That's all from us. The next question we have is from Dave Storms of Stonegate. Please go ahead. Morning, everyone. Just wanted to start. Morning. Morning. Just wanted to start with I know headcount tends to be probably the biggest expense on the food service side of your business, but are you seeing any tariff impacts that are specific to the food service that we should keep an eye on? We're primarily seeing it on the Canadian side and are working diligently with our supply chain as well as with our customers so that we can, in Canada, source as many operational consumables, food, and other items locally in Canada to avoid tariffs. If we're unable to do that, making sure our customers understand that those costs are being passed through. Understood. That's very helpful. I really appreciate you going through your updated guidance the way that you did. Just still trying to get my head a little bit around I know the guidance does not include the acquisition that's expected to close later this year, but I'm just trying to get a sense of what macro factors that it does include. Would you consider this updated guidance the worst-case scenario guidance, optimistic guidance, or maybe somewhere in the middle? How should we think about that? Great question. I would say that the current guidance, most of the focus, and actually implicit in your question, is around the conditions in Canada. In Australia, the outlook right now is fairly straightforward, obviously subject to change, but most of the focus, at least for us, and I think for investors, has been around in Canada. I would say current guidance reflects, I think, reasonably conservative outlook for the business as a whole, but also for Canada. If I had to say what's our downside case, we'd probably lower the lower end by $5 million- $70 million, but that would be a further rather significant deterioration specifically in Canada. That's great. Thank you for taking my questions. Thank you. We have a follow-up question from Stephen Gengaro of Stifel. Please go ahead. Thanks. Yeah. One of the things I just wanted to ask quickly, when we think about the revised guidance, I actually have two questions. One is, is there any change in sort of how we should think about the quarterly cadence of that guide? Maybe as part of that, in past periods when there's been sort of sloppiness in commodity prices, has that generally led to more or less turnaround activity? The customers sort of take advantage of the to do the work, or is it more of a cash flow issue so they're more reluctant to do more turnaround work? I'll answer the first part and ask Collin to comment on the second part. On the first part, in terms of the seasonality of our EBITDA generation, continue to believe that the second and third quarters will be the strongest. That will be slightly offset by the fact that we will have the Australian acquisition close, so it will fully benefit the second half of the year. Generally speaking, we will continue to see 60% plus or minus of the EBITDA generation in the middle two quarters of the year. In terms of turnaround activity relative to commodity prices, I'll ask Collin to comment. Yeah. It's a good question, Stephen. Our customer base plans turnarounds multiple years out in advance, right? There are certain scopes that have a two to three-year cadence, and there are certain scopes that are every year. Depending on what you're able to get done last year, you're going to have some spillover in terms of what you have to get done this year. My sense is that it's historically really driven by the work that needs to be done based on the equipment and less so an opportunistic timing of commodity prices. I will supplement that by saying in either commodity price environment, speed is the name of the game because the longer the turnaround lasts, the less time they're actually producing barrels. We've thought about it internally, but we've never actually observed any sort of change in turnaround behavior strictly as it relates to commodity price to try to take advantage of the sloppiness, as you put it. I would augment that by saying that most of our customers are actually planning their operations around a much lower oil price than even what we're experiencing now, right? Certainly the macroeconomic environment, tariffs, etc., are impacting their thinking. Way before all this happened, they were planning on a much lower commodity or preparing operating as if there were a much lower commodity price environment. I understand. That's helpful. Just one other question. I was just looking at our model, and I think over the last four years and over the last six years, your free cash flow has averaged about $70 million. Recently, it's probably been a little bit lower than that. The guidance you gave this year for 2030, do you view that as an anomaly because of the market conditions? How would you sort of—I know it's early to think about next year, but do you think next year is sort of closer to that sort of $50-$60 million range based on what you know now? There are a couple of things in there. Let me divide up your question. I'll ask Collin to jump in with color or correct my mistakes. Over that six-year time period, the biggest factor—there are two or three big factors. One, we're a cash taxpayer in Australia, which we weren't five years ago, and have been in 2024 and going forward. That's a big change. Two, over that time period, particularly earlier in that time period, we had significant benefit from LNG activity in Canada, which right now is coming to completion and going to production. That's impacting our Canadian operations. Three, on a go-forward basis, we think cash taxes, as we mentioned in the prepared comments, we do have some just timing of cash tax payments in Australia, which are hurting 2025 cash flow. They shouldn't normalize on a go-forward basis and be more normalized. Where do we think operating cash flow can move? It should improve on a go-forward basis. Yes. Yeah. Bradley, I'll just supplement that with you kind of have to think about it with or without the acquisition. All of our guidance has been without the acquisition, but we do remain confident that we will close that in Australia. That cash flow could be layered in in the future years. Again, we're not including that in any of our guidance for 2025, but remain confident we'll close that relatively shortly. The third part about it is just going to be focus by the team, right? We always do look at expenses and sharpen our pencils, but maybe more so in the future on items like CapEx and maintenance CapEx and discrete things that are flowing through the capital line. Speaking personally, I remain optimistic, yes, that 20-30 feels low. When you normalize for cash taxes and some of those other items that we could start approaching some of the numbers you quoted in the outer years. Great. Thank you both. Thanks, Steven. At this time, we are no further questions, and I would like to turn the floor back over to Bradley Dodson for any closing remarks. Thank you. Thank you, everyone, for joining us today on the call. We appreciate your interest in Civeo. We look forward to speaking with you on the second quarter earnings call expected in July. This concludes today's teleconference. Thank you for joining us. You may now disconnect your line.