Good morning, welcome to Dana Incorporated's transaction announcement webcast and conference call. My name is Regina, I will be your conference facilitator. Please be advised that our meeting today, both the speakers' remarks and Q&A session, will be recorded for replay and transcribed. For those participants who would like to access the call from the webcast, please reference the URL on our website. There will be a question and answer period after the speakers' remarks, we'll take questions from sell-side analysts on the telephone only. To ensure that everyone has an opportunity to participate in today's Q&A, we ask that callers limit themselves to one question at a time. If you'd like to ask an additional question, please return to the queue. At this time, I'd like to begin the presentation by turning the call over to Dana's Senior Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications, Craig Barber. Please go ahead, Mr. Barber. Thank you, Regina. Good morning, welcome to Dana's update call. Today's presentation includes forward-looking statements about our expectations for Dana's future performance. Actual results could differ from what we discuss here today. For more details about the factors that may affect the results, please refer to our safe harbor statements and the disclaimers found in our materials published on our website and filed with the reports with the SEC. I encourage you to visit our investor website, where you'll find this morning's press release and presentation. As stated, today's call is being recorded, the supporting materials are the property of Dana Incorporated. It may not be recorded, copied, or rebroadcast without our written consent. With us this morning is Bruce McDonald, Dana Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Byron Foster, Senior Vice President of our Light Vehicle Group and our incoming CEO; and Timothy Kraus, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Bruce, I'll turn the call over to you. Thank you, Craig. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us this morning on what's been, I guess, short notice. We're extremely excited to be announcing the business combination with Eaton's mobility business. Just by way of background, this is a business that we've long been, you could say, coveted. Obviously, it wasn't available in the marketplace being a part of Eaton. Since last January, when Eaton announced their intention to spin this business off, we've moved very quickly and aggressively to reach the agreement that we're announcing here this morning. As we communicated at our capital markets day in March, Dana's vision is to be the world's best powertrain company. We believe this combination, we make a major step towards achieving our vision. If you look at it by combining our axle driveline and electrification portfolio with Eaton's transmission capabilities, we will be a truly differentiated supplier in the powertrain space. In terms of the transaction, it's structured as a Reverse Morris Trust, or RMT, that is being affected so that the transaction is tax-free for Eaton shareholders. The pro forma ownership of the combined company will be Eaton shareholders will own just over 50%, and Dana shareholders will own just under 50%. The combined enterprise value will be about $10 billion based on our current share price. As I mentioned earlier, the transaction, while being tax-free for Eaton shareholders, will also be tax-free for Dana shareholders. In terms of the strategic rationale, it's fairly simple. This really transforms Dana and expands our 2030 strategy. It increases our scale in both CV and aftermarket segments, provides us with cross-selling opportunities where we think we can accelerate the growth rate that we're already committing to in each of those two businesses. In terms of margins, it's accretive to both EBITDA and free cash flow margins. We committed to a 15% adjusted EBITDA margins for Dana under our 2030 strategy. We believe we will be there in 2027, the first year this transaction is in effect. We're upping our 2030 EBITDA targets and free cash flow targets significantly, Tim will get into those later on in his presentation. Lastly, we believe there's compelling value creation for our shareholders through the $250 million of cost synergies that we are absolutely committing to. Turning to page five, I'll just go through a little bit more of the details on the transaction. In terms of the enterprise value at $5.1 billion, that represents a multiple of about 5.9 times 2026 pro forma EBITDA, that includes our run rate of $250 million of synergies. In terms of the shareholding, we already talked about that. The equity component of this deal will be about $4 billion, that's essentially a fixed number of shares based on our five-day VWAP at June 4th. We will also pay a cash dividend to Eaton, which will be funded by new debt of $1.1 billion. I would note the $1.1 billion dividend was subject to normal closing adjustments for cash and debt levels. In terms of our balance sheet, we expect it to remain extremely strong at 1.2x immediately after closing. At that level, we expect our current credit ratings to be unchanged. In terms of the governance of the company, I'm going to transition, as previously announced, into the Chairman role. My role will change. I'll stay on as Executive Chairman, and I will have primary responsibility for integrating the businesses and synergy realization. Byron will become the Chief Executive Officer on July 1. Tim Kraus will remain our CFO, and the management team will be joined by Aaron Rouse from Eaton, who will serve as our CHRO effective upon closing. In terms of the board of directors, in addition to the current eight-member board that we have, we will be adding three Eaton nominees. One of them will be an Eaton executive and two will be current directors at Eaton. We believe we'll significantly strengthen the board of the combined company with the addition of these three high-quality directors. In terms of closing, the deal is subject to normal regulatory and competition-type approvals, as well as a shareholder vote from Dana shareholders, and we expect the transaction to close sometime in the first quarter of 2027. As I talked about before, we are committing to deliver $250 million of synergies within 24 months of closing, a number that we're extremely confident we can deliver. With that, Byron, I'll turn it over to you to go through an overview of the new business. Okay. Thanks, Bruce, and good morning, everyone. Thanks for joining. Let me give you an overview of Eaton's Mobility Business. In terms of the business's focus, it's really around providing engineered solutions for creating, distributing, and optimizing power for commercial vehicle, light vehicle, as well as supplying the aftermarket space. In terms of products, you can see some of the key product lines there, I'm on page six. Commercial vehicle transmissions, engine and emission systems, and various components, as well as a suite of EV products. Then an aftermarket business that supplies various products and components, which we'll talk a little bit more about in the coming slides. In terms of the financials, $3.3 billion of revenue is the estimate for 2026. You can see that split, roughly 65% of that revenue is focused on the commercial vehicle space and 35% on light vehicle. 25% of the revenue is aftermarket, so a very strong aftermarket position, and we're looking forward to the opportunities of combining our aftermarket businesses. Then you can see from a margin perspective, in 2026, the estimate is 19% EBITDA margins. In terms of the regional split of the business, roughly 50% of the revenue is here in North America, with the other half of the revenue pretty equally split between South America, Europe, and APAC. Then serving all of the major OEMs across both the light vehicle and commercial vehicle space. If you turn to page seven, you can see the global footprint. 28 manufacturing sites deliver to the customers. You can see a very strong footprint in the key regions, North America, South America, then you can see four sites in Europe and five sites in the Asia Pacific region. Going to page eight, as Bruce mentioned, this combination fully aligns with Dana's vision to be the world's best powertrain company. If you really look at the capabilities brought to the table from Dana as well as from Eaton's Mobility business, it really positions the combined company to win in this space. Just to take a second here and walk through this. If you think about the drivetrain portfolio, Dana brings obviously expertise in the driveline space as well as a low-cost manufacturing footprint that now combines with Eaton's leadership position in the commercial truck transmission and clutch space. In terms of the powertrain, you can see, obviously, Dana brings expertise and depth in axles, drive shafts, and various thermal management products that you guys know well, combining that with Eaton's transmission and mission-critical power creation and distribution products. Really broadening our product portfolio and the solution set that we can bring to our customers. From an aftermarket perspective, Dana brings a broad portfolio of sealing and thermal and driveline product to that space. That now combines with Eaton's global distribution network and commercial vehicle replacement parts. Again, bringing a broader set of solutions to our customers in the aftermarket space. From a margin expansion and resiliency relative to cash generation, really the combination of Dana's program cadence, the cost discipline that we've put into the business, combined with a really durable demand pattern and strong margin portfolio from Eaton really positions us well from a P&L and balance sheet standpoint. If you go with me to page nine now, just to step back at a high level and look at the combination. We're bringing together Dana's seven and a half billion dollar driveline business that is very highly, from a mix standpoint, leveraged to the light vehicle space, with 20% of our business being commercial vehicle and the remainder being aftermarket. Combining it now with Eaton's Mobility business, $3.3 billion top line, and you can see the mix there being 42% commercial vehicle, 34% light vehicle, and the remaining 24% aftermarket. You can see that combination really provides a much more balanced portfolio across the end markets and a stronger position from the mix standpoint in the aftermarket space. Really excited about the combination of two great companies and the value that can be created for our customers and our shareholders. With that, let me turn it over to Tim, he'll take us through more of the financial update of the deal. Appreciate it, Byron. Thank you, good morning to everybody. If you turn to page 10, just to give a quick overview on the aftermarket business. The aftermarket growth was a key pillar of our 2030 strategy, this transaction strengthens that pillar and helps accelerate the growth in our business. As you can see, Dana's current business is about $900 million in the aftermarket. We're adding about $800 million from Eaton for a combined business that's about $1.7 billion. We're very excited. Offers a comprehensive range of genuine and all makes products. We believe there's a lot of additional opportunities around cross-selling and significant growth run rate within this business. We do see this as a high-margin, non-cyclical business that really helps underpin the financial strength of the combined business. With that, I'll turn it on to page 11. We'll talk a little bit about our Dana 2030 growth strategy. As Bruce mentioned, our strategy is to be the world's best powertrain supplier t his transaction absolutely strengthens that. With that, we remain 100% committed to the strategy we laid out in March at our capital markets day. If you look, our prior sales target that we laid out for 2030 was $10 billion in revenue. We're revising that today to be between $14 billion and $15 billion. Really accentuating that this transaction accelerates our 2030 growth targets, broadens the scope of our traditional products. That's both in CV transmissions and in cross-selling opportunities across all the products. Especially in aftermarket, as I just mentioned, broadens the breadth and really deepens the products across all of our end markets. We're really excited to advance the growth strategy and take those targets up from $10 billion to $14 billion to $15 billion. Part of the compelling value creation of this transaction are the $250 million of projected synergies. As you look, we believe that this will be completed by the end of the second year of the acquisition. $250 million of run rate savings after 24 months of the transaction. The synergies typically come from corporate, duplicative corporate functions, the integration of the CV and LEV businesses between Dana and the Eaton business. Additional purchasing opportunities. As we gain scale and breadth, we'll be able to continue to leverage both organizations. Engineering. There are a number of different engineering centers that we're going to be able to rationalize and bring together to drive cost savings. Then manufacturing is another key pillar. Operational improvements as well as automation and footprint realization. Then, of course, aftermarket. As I just mentioned, aftermarket is a key pillar. We believe there's a lot of opportunities to drive synergies through the business. As Bruce mentioned, we are 100% committed. Don't believe we have any issue in being able to deliver $250 million of run rate savings as a result of combining our business. That's $250 million out of what amounts to an $11 billion business. If you move to page 13, the transaction, the combined businesses provide a robust financial profile and strong profitability. Combined sales on a 2026 estimated basis, about $11 billion, as Byron mentioned. Pro forma adjusted EBITDA, about $1.7 billion, driving margins to 15%. As you may recall, our 2030 target was $10 billion with 15% EBITDA margins. Those are going to be realized immediately upon the consummation of this transaction. Then our combined aftermarket sale, again, $1.7 billion, creating a very large and scaled aftermarket business for the combined entity. If you turn to page 14, this transaction, given the significant component that's being paid in stock, continues to maintain our strong balance sheet. We have committed financing in place for the transaction. We expect to refinance our existing capital structure as part of the transaction. We expect the pro forma net leverage, after considering synergies, will be about 1.2 turns. Again, we're running around 1% today. We will continue to have an exceedingly strong balance sheet, with maturities that are largely pushed out well beyond 2030. We are committed to completing our existing $2 billion shareholder return authorization that we approved earlier in the year. We have to temporarily suspend the buyback program to preserve the tax-free nature of the Reverse Morris Trust transaction. We expect our excess cash in the interim to be used for de-leveraging. We do expect our credit ratings to remain largely unchanged as a result of the transaction. If you turn with me now to the next page. Dana 2030 driving multiple expansion, right? These are our new targets for 2030. Sales of $14 billion-$15 billion, adjusted EBITDA margin of approximately 18%. That's 750 basis points improvement over our 2026 guide for Dana alone. Adjusted free cash flow margins of 8%-9%, and that's a 450 basis points improvement over our 2026 guide. This acquisition accelerates and expands Dana 2030 targets. We have above-market rate growth. It fundamentally improves its operations for top quartile margins. We're accelerating our free cash flow generation. We continue to be laser-focused on increasing shareholder value, and we believe this transaction does just that. With that, I will turn it back over to Byron for some concluding remarks. Okay. Just to close it out, thank you, Tim. Thank you, Bruce. We couldn't be more excited about the opportunity that combining with Eaton's mobility business presents to our team, to the Eaton team, to our customers, and to our shareholders. Just a couple highlights of the key points that we want to leave you with. One, it creates a comprehensive, high-value powertrain portfolio right in line with the vision that we've put in place for the company. It accelerates our aftermarket expansion. We've shared with you that that's a key pillar of the Dana 2030 strategy. This just accelerates that plan for us. Increases our commercial vehicle scale and market coverage, again, bringing better balance to our mix of end markets that we serve. Reduces our customer concentration. As you know, Dana has a very concentrated kind of customer mix. This diversifies the customer base that we serve. Combines really two exceptional teams that have history. These companies go back a long way. We've had partnerships in the past, we look forward to bringing these teams together, again, to drive performance and serve our customers. Expands our margins and free cash flow, maintains our strong balance sheet, at the end of the day, increases shareholder value. Again, we're excited to share the news with you all this morning, we look forward to any questions that you might have. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, simply press star, followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Our first question will come from the line of Rajat Gupta with JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Great. Thanks for taking the question and congrats on the announcement. Just as a quick question on the long-term sales targets of $14 billion-$15 billion, is there any change to the legacy Dana organic growth assumptions? Also, what's being assumed for Eaton Mobility organic growth in those targets? Maybe you could layer in what kind of revenue synergies you're expecting from the deal that might be aiding that target as well. I have a quick follow-up. Thanks. Let me take the first part in terms of Dana's organic growth plans. I would say no changes to the strategy that we have in place. If you'll recall, we talked about three pillars of growth, our traditional business, which we've already had some proof points in terms of our ability to continue to grow our driveline business with our key customers. Aftermarket, I think we've laid out a number of strategies of what we're doing there to drive growth in the aftermarket space, as well as our Applied Technologies that gets us into complementary markets, where we think the Dana technologies and product portfolio can bring value. Those plans, those targets that are part of Dana 2030 remain in place, we see no change to what we're driving there. Tim, you want to speak to the. If you take a look, we're still committed, as Byron just mentioned, to our $10 billion target. We're showing $14 billion-$15 billion for the combined entity. Eaton's currently about $3.3 billion. We see significant growth in Eaton coming as well over that five-year period. Obviously, they're in some of the same markets we are. If you think about our growth in terms of the market recovery in CV, that's part of the story for Eaton. We do believe that there are opportunities, given the products that Eaton has as we combine and we start thinking about our Applied Technologies growth pillar, that we're going to find opportunities in those pillars to be able to continue to push our sales further in terms of growth out years. The vast majority or all of the cost synergies, the $250 million of synergies that we're underwriting today are all on the cost side of the business. Understood. That's helpful. Just a quick follow-up on the buyback. I understand the temporary suspension here. Given this is a bigger EBITDA base, a bigger free cash flow trajectory, is there any change to the prior $2 billion through 2030 authorization, or do you anticipate any change to that once this transaction is closed? Thanks. No change to the authorization. We haven't, but you hit the nail on the head. As we think about the size of the business and where the capital structure is, we believe we're going to have significant excess capital as we move into the latter part of the plan years, which should give us the ability to continue to and accelerate our capital return program. As of today, we are fully committed to returning the full $2 billion within that time period. Just so everybody knows, I don't think I mentioned it in my opening remarks, we are prohibited for 24 months after the closing of the transaction on the buyback. That's the limit. We believe, if you fast-forward, when we get into 2029, we'll be able to resume the buyback. I think our previous $2 billion obviously didn't use up all of our free cash flow, so we had cushion there, and clearly this gives us a lot more cushion than we had before. I would say there's upward bias on our buyback as opposed to risk. Understood. That's helpful. Good luck. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Emmanuel Rosner with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead. Great. Thank you so much. Can you maybe talk a little bit about the backdrop of this deal for you, how that came about? It seems like, based on your recent capital markets day, you have a lot of growth opportunities organically as well. Obviously, your 2030 targets are still very much there. What is this bringing you essentially that- Sure would help you in get longer term? Well, I think, first of all, this is a business that has always been of high strategic interest to Dana. The axle, our driveline, powertrain, especially when you look at some electrification, these products fit exceptionally well together. For us, this improves the scale of our business in commercial vehicle, which has accretive margins. It also brings very healthy aftermarket exposure. It's a business that we, I'll say, have long desired. Unfortunately, it was a portion of Eaton, and it was not available in the market. In late January, Eaton announced their intention to spin the business off, and it became kind of a once in a generational opportunity for us to acquire a premier asset of high strategic interest and fit with significant synergy opportunities. It was opportunistic, but it certainly fits in our strategy to become the world's best powertrain supplier. Got it. Thank you. Just a quick follow-up. Can you just give a little bit more detail on pro forma free cash flow, I guess both now and sort of post synergies. To the extent that you're prevented from doing buybacks for probably next couple of years to three years, what would be the use of free cash flow sort of in the meantime? Their business has a better free cash flow profile than we, largely due to the higher margins that are coming in the business, and the higher exposure to aftermarket, which is a big component of that. We would expect our free cash flow in the near term, if you think about where we're at today and where we're now projecting in 2030, we'll have additional free cash flow returns in the near term as well. In terms of use of our free cash flow, so obviously we need to integrate the business. There are costs to do that, so we'll spend a bit on that. We will use the proceeds in the interim or the cash flow interim to de-lever the business. From there, we'll continue to think about our ability to then redeploy that capital, whether it be in growth or as we talked about here just a few minutes ago, in terms of increasing the size of our capital return program. Got it. Thank you. Our next question will come from the line of Colin Langan with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Great. Thanks for taking my question. I'm trying to struggle with the $250 million of synergies. It's quite a large number given that the sales were, I think, EBIT for the business that you're acquiring was only $400. What is driving that? Is there product overlap? Is there consolidation? Some of the items you list on the slide, like purchasing and corporate, this is coming out of a large corporation, so why wouldn't they have had those synergies in the current company? Yeah. I'll maybe start with that, Colin. First of all, I think our $250 million is a certainty. It's a covenant that we're signing up to, and we have absolute confidence that we can deliver it, just like we have with our other cost reduction commitments. In terms of the buckets, Tim kind of went through those in detail, but I guess I wouldn't look at it like we're taking $250 million out of Eaton's $3.3 billion. We're taking $250 million out of the combined company. We have duplicative overhead structures in light vehicle and commercial vehicle on a regional basis, and we intend to run the company as one unit, not as two separate pieces. Same situation if you look at our aftermarket. There's completely duplicative network warehousing structures. We intend to integrate those. Within Eaton's business, there's a fairly significant number in terms of corporate costs that are allocated to that business, and I can tell you our overhead cost structure is a lot leaner than Eaton's, that's a big driver of the savings as well. Yeah, I'll call a couple other things here. You mentioned purchasing. I think what we're seeing here is this business is very different from the rest of the businesses within the Eaton portfolio, there's a lot more synergies on the purchasing side with Dana than there was actually in the broad umbrella of Eaton. The other big driver I know on the synergies is around the automation on their factory floors. They have exceptionally well-run plants, but much like the journey we had been on over the last few years, they had been spending a lot of capital on their EV journey, not increasing automation and efficiencies from a plant perspective. We do see all the things that we're doing around our Dana 2030 being able to overlay onto the Eaton business and be able to really drive a lot larger synergy number than you would typically think you'd see in a transaction or a combination of this size. Got it. You did mention, my fault, it was going to be on the EV products. Any color on does there overlap with what you're doing today in that segment that you're acquiring? You've been kind of de-emphasizing EVs. Is this a shift? Is this one of the assets you're looking at, or how should we think about the incorporation of those EV assets, and what kind of position does Eaton have in those areas today? Well, I guess to the first part, Colin, the first part of your question, the products do not overlap. Think more power distribution type of products and components that come with the Eaton portfolio. They have gone through what the entire supply base and our OEs have gone through in terms of right-sizing and repositioning that business to the reality of where the volume profiles are. At the end of the day, the EV vehicles, if you will, aren't going away. It's just the trajectory is a lot different than initially planned. They've been rebalanced and re-scoped to support the customers given that trajectory. Much like we've done with our business. We haven't stood up and said we're exiting EV. We just have to right-size it to the real market demand and outlook. Yeah, just to add on to Byron's comment, we are putting two subscale EV businesses together, that's a huge opportunity for the business. I think to your point, are we changing our strategy in terms of how we're thinking about EV? No, we are not. It's still part of, obviously, the portfolio, but we are going to continue to have the same philosophy towards EV after the transaction as we have now, which is we'll look at opportunities. They have to meet our hurdle rates, and if the customer wants bespoke products, they have to pay for the capital and the engineering. If they want to buy an off-the-shelf product, then we'll work with them too. We have not changed our EV strategy at all. Got it. All right. Thanks for taking my questions and congrats on the deal. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of James Mulholland with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning, guys, and thanks for taking my question. I just want to revisit those 2030 growth buckets, if we could. Looking especially at that $1 billion in traditional aftermarket and Applied Technologies, should we think of these as materially larger now to get to that $15 billion or the $14 billion-$15 billion, or does the acquisition already accomplish the aftermarket component? Are these separate? What's your thought process there? The thought process is that the acquisition is additive, we will continue. If you think about our chart, we had $200 million in aftermarket, just speaking on that. We're still fully committed, and I think as we walk through the year, we'll be able to demonstrate the opportunities that we're capturing for aftermarket. No, we got a $1.7 billion aftermarket today. You're going to add $200 million in from our 2030, and then there is additional growth coming with Eaton because they, like us, were focused on continuing to grow and find those opportunities on the aftermarket side. The aftermarket is not, hey, Eaton solves that problem. It's additive to what we've shown in our current 2023 strategy. If anything, I would say it brings the opportunity to accelerate our aspirations in the aftermarket space because things like boots on the ground in the region, supporting customers. We're looking to leverage that network that is much better in place, let's say, with the Eaton team than building organically. We're really looking to leverage the both, the capabilities and capacity that Eaton brings to bear, to accelerate our aspirations in the aftermarket space. Great. Thank you. That's helpful. I guess looking at the new company's manufacturing footprint, I guess it's probably fair to say that some of the plants are going to need to be evaluated, maybe changed over to Dana's systems. Should we expect some material restructuring expense in the meantime? Or at first glance, does the footprint look relatively turnkey and something we won't expect to see material changes or closures? If so, could there be some upside to synergies there if you do have to go out and close a few of these plants? I think we obviously have a lot of work to do in order to understand their manufacturing footprint. We do see opportunities, but as we kind of work through integration and do that planning, we'll come back. To your point, do we think there's upside? We are supremely confident in our ability to deliver the 250. If you just think about where we've been on the journey on our own cost reduction plan, we're going to continue to work. We won't be satisfied with the level of efficiency that we've laid out. As we find those opportunities, we'll clearly go after them. Great. Thank you. Our next question will come from the line of Joseph Spak with UBS. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Tim, maybe just going back to the product portfolio, as you mentioned, it does look fairly complementary, is there any overlap? Are there any sort of areas or products you think you might need to take a look at just for regulatory purposes? Short answer is no. Good morning, Joe. Short answer is no. We have some transmission business in the specialty kind of sports car space, but again, very different product. As I mentioned on the EV side, really no overlap there. Short answer is no, we don't expect that we'll have to peel anything off from a regulatory standpoint. Okay. Thank you for that. Then just back to the synergies. I guess I had a slightly different take, because when you sold Off-Highway, you found $300 million sort of standalone. I know maybe there was some greater inefficiency to Dana versus Eaton, although I think you just said it might be the inverse at this point. Just wondering again, if you could give us a little bit more sort of color on those synergies and maybe just some high-level split of the synergies by the buckets you listed between corporate purchasing, engineering, et cetera. Yeah. Hey, Joe, it's Tim. I think we'll certainly as we kind of come through, give more detail around the buckets. I think we've done obviously quite a bit of work, but we still have some more to do. Again, I think we're bringing an organization that has lots of overlap with what we have. We do believe that the way we're going to think about running the business is going to allow us to drive those costs out of the business. Again, we can kind of break them down as we get a little bit further into integration. From our perspective, $250 million is If you notice on our deck, it doesn't say approximately anywhere, it just says $250. There's a reason for that. We're that confident in being able to deliver those synergies. Yeah. Joe, maybe just to add on to that. A key decision for Eaton was should we spin the business off or do this transaction? We have shared a lot more details with our synergy plans with Eaton in order to convince them that this was the best deal for their shareholders, and they have high confidence, hence their decision to go with us, that we can deliver that. Okay. Thanks for that, Tim. Our next question will come from the line of Tom Narayan with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks. Thanks for taking the question. Just understanding the slide five, that 5.9x 26 multiple for Eaton Mobility. That includes the synergies. That doesn't include the $1.1 billion special dividend, right? No. No, it does not. Okay. Yeah, no, the multiple doesn't. Yeah. Hold on. So then I guess- Is the It's fully synergized. It's EBITDA plus synergy. Total purchase price. Yeah. Total It's Yeah. Oh, I'm sorry. I misheard. It's based off the $5.1 billion enterprise value. Which includes the $1.1. Which includes the $1.1. I apologize. Okay. Got it. Okay. I understand. Okay. That $8.3 then includes the $1.1 but excludes the synergies. Correct. Okay. I guess, I know you said that we'll get more color on the buckets that Joe was asking about, is there any sense of kind of low-hanging fruit? There was obviously a deal that in the industry that just got announced with some fairly funky buckets, let's say on the procurement side, it was like 50% of their synergies. I think people just want to better understand, given the percentage of "target," if you call Eaton the target here, synergies, I think it's like 7.5% of sales does seem a little, A, versus the standard 5%. Any just help on what's obvious low-hanging fruit? Is it like the majority of the 250? I know you're going to figure it out. There's obviously a slug that's purchasing, that's not the significant driver. The bigger buckets are the overlapping structures and automation and increases in productivity that we can drive into the business. Obviously they run a fully standing group of businesses that are divisions within Eaton. We do the same. There are quite a bit of duplicative costs that are going to come out of the business. Okay. I remember at the Capital Markets Day, a big topic was non-automotive, right? Including non-CV, either. Just wondering how that changes or improves potentially with this. There's been a lot of interest in things like data center, energy storage, et cetera. Does that change because of this, or is it kind of what you've been saying before? Thanks. No, I think obviously we have a broader product mix, maybe Byron Foster can jump in, we see more opportunities, not less as a result of the transaction. Again, I think the spaces that we've highlighted that we see as great adjacencies for Applied Technologies, just think about the Applied Technologies portfolio to Tim's point now increases. Our way to serve markets like power sports or defense or what have you would increase. I think in terms of this data center question, our feedback isn't any different than what we've put out there at the last couple of conferences, which is it's on the list relative to looking at if there's a solution that would make sense, but very early stages at this point. I wouldn't look at this transaction as changing or accelerating that particular market. Got it. Thanks. I'll turn it over. Okay. Our final question will come from the line of Dan Levy with Barclays. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Wanted to just first ask on the broader end market strategy going forward. When you did the Off-Highway spin, one of the rationales for that was a broader simplification of Dana. Now, I know that you're still getting light vehicle and commercial vehicles that are different from Off-Highway, how do you address sort of the question of simplification, which I think has been one of the core targets here? Does that change that at all for you? Well, no. Look, we're going to continuously examine our product portfolio for those products that we think we can add value for our customers and shareholders and where we can't make those decisions about where to go with a particular product line. That work that we've been doing in Dana continues, and I know Eaton culturally has that same kind of mindset relative to their product portfolio. Obviously, our portfolio expands here, but again, each product, each segment, each customer that we serve has to stand on its own and deliver value, and we're going to continue thinking about the business in that regard. Yeah, maybe just a little bit to add on to that. When we announced the sale of our Off-Highway business, we had a lot of questions about, is CV next? We like the commercial vehicle business. We recognized we had a lot of opportunities to improve the margins in that business. I would look at this as this is highly complementary. We remain very laser-focused on commercial vehicle and Light Vehicle, and this transaction really gives us an increased amount of scale on the CV side. It further enhances our business diversification. Great. Thank you. As a follow-up, sometimes when we see companies spin out assets, sometimes those are assets that just didn't get the investment that they needed over the years. What's your confidence that you had from your diligence that the business here has had the right level of investment and that there's not some uptick investment that you're going to have to make to get the products on par with where they should be? Yeah. Obviously, as part of diligence, we visited the main manufacturing sites, and I would say, like Byron alluded to earlier, the business has spent a lot of money on EV in the past, and probably just like us, has neglected, let's say, capital spending on automation. They're probably where we are in the journey, maybe a little bit behind. This is a well-run business that makes high teens margins. Let's not forget about that. Yeah, there's definitely opportunities for increasing the investment in the plants and generating some of the synergies that we've talked about in the manufacturing area. It's not going to be a major uptick in our CapEx, and as Tim alluded to, we expect our free cash flow margins to expand on day one. Great. Thank you. With that, I think we'll bring the call to a close. Again, I want to thank everybody for joining the call on relatively short notice and just reiterate how excited we are for the future of Dana and Eaton's Mobility business coming together, serving our customers and shareholders. We're excited. We'll keep you updated as the process matures. Again, thanks for joining. This concludes today's call. Thank you again for joining. You may now disconnect.