Good morning or good afternoon all, and welcome to the Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. fourth quarter earnings call. My name is Adam, and I'll be your operator for today. If you'd like to ask a question on to the Q&A portion of today's call, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. Before we begin, the company would like to remind you that discussions during this call contain forward-looking statements made under the safe harbor provisions of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any such statements, including as set forth in today's press release and the company's filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, to which we refer you. During this call, references will be made to non-GAAP financial measures and supplemental measures to review and assess operating performance. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the financial information prepared and presented in accordance with the U.S. GAAP. For information about these non-GAAP measures and for reconciliation to GAAP, please refer to today's earnings release. I will now hand over to Kevin O'Connor to begin. Kevin, please go ahead when you are ready. Good morning. Thank you, Adam, and thank you all for joining us this morning. With me today are Stuart Lubow, our President and Chief Operating Officer, and Avinash Reddy, our CFO. We are pleased to report another strong quarter for Dime. Before we get into the quarter results, I want to take a moment to comment on our full year performance. 2022 was a very successful year for Dime, and our strong and consistent performance throughout the year reflects the power of our commercially focused community bank model and our dominant market share on Greater Long Island. For the full year, we reported over $145 million in net income and EPS of $3.73 per share. Our return on assets for the 4 quarters of 2022 were 1.13%, 1.27%, 1.26%, and 1.23%. Stable results during this rapidly rising and unprecedented interest rate environment. We were able to achieve strong returns by keeping our operating expenses controlled and our NIM average 3.25% for 2022, compared to 3.14% for the fourth quarter, consistent with our stated posture operating a moderately asset-sensitive balance sheet. We supported our customers and grew loans by approximately $1.3 billion and put in place the talent and infrastructure to grow our C&I business to the next level. I must give full credit to each of our 800+ employees on delivering record growth and profitability. Turning to our results for the fourth quarter, we generated net income of $38.2 million, or EPS of $0.99 a share, a year-over-year increase of 19%. We had another impressive quarter of net loan growth and again focused on prudent cost control. Loan growth for this quarter was well balanced across various asset classes. Importantly, and a key strategic priority for us, this quarter we grew business loan balances by $215 million and continue to have a strong pipeline in this area. Stu, I'm sure, will provide more color on our current pipeline and the mix in the Q&A. As you heard from our peers, and consistent with the banking industry at large, the environment for deposit gathering is extremely competitive. Not just competition from other banks, but also from market-related products such as U.S. Treasuries and money market funds. Despite these headwinds, we were able to maintain average DDA at around 36% of deposits. We continue to expect some level of migration from DDA to interest-bearing accounts, are laser-focused on this, and our incentive compensation plans from top to bottom are designed on prioritizing DDA. We have a strong group of commercial bankers, have had the luxury over the past years of using excess liquidity on our balance sheet. Obviously, their goals and objectives this year will be heavily weighted and refocused even more on deposit generation. In addition to our commercial bankers, we have a specialized treasury management team with a robust product set. Working in tandem with our commercial bankers and retail branches, we have all the right people and systems in place to deliver on 2023 goals. We were not very competitive on consumer deposit front over the past few years. However, starting in late 2022 and into 2023, we, like many others, are being more competitive in this segment as well. We think 2023 deposit growth will come from various sources. Some component will be DDA, it will also include a mix of less price-sensitive interest-bearing accounts and even some market-sensitive accounts. Our cycle to date deposit beta for this round of tightening has been approximately 19.7%. 74 basis points versus the increase in cost, 74 basis point increase in cost of deposits versus 375 basis points of Fed hikes up to mid-December. Our performance on this front compares favorably to our Metro New York competitors. Our relatively lower betas have been driven by the significant level of DDA in our balance sheet. This remains a clear differentiator for Dime versus other competitor banks in our footprint. As you know, historically, the Metro New York area has been a more competitive market for deposit gathering while affording robust loan growth opportunities and more stable asset quality performance than other parts of the country. Avi will get into our expectations for betas and NIM in his remarks. Moving to asset quality, our NPAs and loans 90 days past due were down 22% versus the linked quarter. During the pandemic, we also took a fairly conservative stance on migrating loans to classified status, and we've seen a significant decline in classified assets this year. Our net charge-offs in the fourth quarter were only one basis point. Avi will again provide more detail on loan provisioning for this quarter. Suffice to say, we feel comfortable with the level of reserve and the overall health of our balance sheet. Thus far, we have not seen any meaningful early warning indicators of credit deterioration. As you know, Dime's credit losses have been well below the bank index over multiple cycles. Underpinning our strong historical credit performance has been our bulletproof multifamily portfolio that has an LTV of only 57%. We continue to believe this portfolio will outperform any potential recessionary environment. Also, as this has been a fairly topical question on other earnings calls, a quick update on our office exposure in Manhattan. As mentioned previously, we only have $229 million of loans with an LTV of approximately 53%. Finally, as the AOCI and the balance sheet stable this quarter, we were able to grow tangible book value per share by $0.86 for the quarter or 15.4%. We had a strong quarter and year. Our balance sheet is positioned to produce strong returns in any economic environment, as evidenced by our quarterly and year-to-date ROAs of over 1.2%. We remain focused on managing our margins in a difficult inverted yield curve environment, and we are focused on growing core deposit relationships which have value in any rate environment. We remain excited to deliver on the opportunities in front of us as a true community commercial bank and are highly focused on being responsive to market conditions and our customers' needs. Our goals for 2023 remain consistent. Managing our cost of funds and prioritizing NIM in an inverted yield and yield curve environment, prudently managing expenses, as always, maintaining solid asset quality. At this point, I'd like to turn the conference call over to Avi, who will provide some additional color on our quarterly results and thoughts around 2023. Thank you, Kevin. For the fourth quarter, our reported net income to common was $38.2 million. The reported NIM for the quarter was 3.15%. As Kevin mentioned, our full year 2022 NIM was higher than the 2021 fourth quarter base, reflecting a moderately asset sensitive position. Over the course of the third and fourth quarters, we supported loan demand through the addition of approximately $1 billion of FHLB borrowings. While we had the ability to borrow longer at a lower cost, we intentionally kept the duration of these borrowings to one month or less so that we can benefit from a full repricing in the event that the forward interest rate curve materializes and the Federal Reserve does indeed lower rates starting in late 2023 into 2024. Similar to how many companies kept excess cash during the pandemic and benefited from rising rates, we're following a similar strategy on the liability side, where we are intentionally staying short and hope to benefit from a full repricing if and when rates do go down. Couple of housekeeping items. Net accretable balance from purchase accounting currently stands at approximately one and a half million, and purchase accounting accretion was fairly immaterial this quarter. Included in the 315 margin was 3 basis points of prepayment related income. Our average total deposits for the quarter were down 2%, and our cost of total deposits increased by 46 basis points. We were again pleased with our deposit betas lagging the level of Fed funds increases in the fourth quarter. That said, given the rapid pace of rate increases and the absolute level of market rates, we do expect deposit betas to continue to increase from the levels seen this cycle. We continue to have a significant repricing opportunity on our loan portfolio, and we continue to proactively manage our loan pricing. The rate on our total pipeline is approximately 6.25%. This is significantly higher than our existing loan portfolio rate of approximately 4.75%. The clear medium to longer term opportunity for us is to reprice our loan portfolio at new origination rates, which are approximately 150-175 basis points above the overall portfolio rate. Core cash operating expenses, excluding intangible amortization and loss on extinguishment of debt for 2022 was $198 million, which was within our full year guidance. We remain highly focused on expense discipline while making necessary investments in our franchise and have built this into our culture on a very granular level. Core cash operating expense for the fourth quarter, excluding intangible amortization, came in at approximately $50 million. Our core efficiency ratio this quarter was 47%, and for the full year 2022, we also operated at approximately 47%. Non-interest income for the fourth quarter was approximately nine and a half million dollars, or a 19% increase versus core non-interest income from the third quarter, excluding the branch sale gain in the third quarter. As we had predicted, revenue from our back-to-back customer loan swap program and our SBA business picked up in the fourth quarter compared to third quarter levels. Moving on to credit quality. Our provision for the quarter was $335,000. While we did have approximately $450 million of loan growth in the fourth quarter, we also saw a reduction in reserves on various individually analyzed loans that moved from substandard and doubtful categories into better risk ratings, driving a release in reserves for our individually analyzed portfolios. Needless to say, we're comfortable with the level of reserves on our balance sheet. Our existing allowance for credit losses of 79 basis points is still above the historical pre-pandemic combined levels of the legacy institutions. During the fourth quarter, our capital levels remained relatively stable despite supporting $450 million of loan growth. As we've guided to previously, supporting loan growth and our clients is the first and best use of our capital base. We will continue to manage our balance sheet efficiently and our tangible equity ratio of 7.76%, including the full impact of AOCI and 8.40%, excluding the impact of AOCI, is within our comfort zone. I'll provide some guidance for 2023. We expect loan growth for the first half of 2023 to be in the mid-single digits on an annualized basis. We've clearly demonstrated strong loan originations with sequential growth every quarter in 2022. Our focus is on growing solid business relationships while keeping our multifamily portfolio relatively flat. Given the economic environment and uncertainty around how customers will react to additional Federal Reserve rate hikes, we will update you on our growth goals for the second half of the year on subsequent earnings calls. As you know, we don't provide quarterly quantitative NIM guidance. We're operating in a significantly inverted yield curve with intense competition on the deposit side. As Kevin mentioned, our deposit beta to date has been 19.7%, fairly creditable for a 375 basis point rate shock to the system. Even with some future deposit cost lag, if rate increases had stopped at these levels, we would have been within our previous cumulative cycle guidance for deposit betas of 20%-25%, which was based on around 300 to 325 basis points of rate hikes. Given the fact that the Federal Reserve is going to the 5% area on rates, we're now expecting higher cumulative betas as the last 100-150 basis points has had a more heightened impact on customer behavior versus the first 100-250 basis points. Given the level of Fed funds increases in the competitive environment in general, there'll be a lingering impact of deposit cost catch up over the course of 2023. Our best estimate right now is that cumulative betas end up in the 30% area for total deposit costs and deposit costs peak towards the back half of this year. The loan-to-deposit ratio ended the year at 103%, up from 97% in the prior quarter and slightly above our target range of 90%-95% to 100%. Going forward, we will exercise price discipline and pace deposit growth to approximate the growth in well-priced lending opportunities. We're keenly focused on deposit gathering through our seasoned relationship bankers, treasury management teams, and competitively priced consumer deposits. Our goal is to operate over the course of 2023 with a loan-to-deposit ratio below 108. Should rates decline in future years, 2024 and beyond, we do expect prepayments in the multifamily portfolio to pick up, which will lead to a natural normalizing of the loan-to-deposit ratio over time. As mentioned previously, our core cash operating expense base, excluding intangible amortization, was $50 million for the fourth quarter, or $200 million annualized. We expect core cash operating expenses for 2023 to be between $206 million and $209 million. Included in this guidance is approximately $2 million of additional expenses related to the industry-wide FDIC surcharge and also $2 million of additional expenses for our pension plans for 2023, which is related to the poor performance of the equity markets in 2022. Obviously, both these items are outside of our control. Absent these items, the expense guide would have been closer to $202 million-$205 million. Be that as it may, we remain focused on controlling the things we can, and we will do everything in our power to beat the guide for this year. We continue to evaluate opportunities for expense reductions across the bank. We expect non-interest income to be within a range of $35 million-$37 million. This guidance takes into account the full year impact of the Durbin Amendment on interchange. We expect to manage our capital ratios efficiently and are very comfortable operating the company at our current capital levels. We are very active on the share repurchase front in 2021 and 2022. Should our capital levels build for any reason, we will not be shy to enter the market via repurchases given the value we see in our stock. Finally, with respect to the tax rate for 2023, we expect it to be approximately 28%. With that, we can turn the call back to Adam for questions. Thank you. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question today, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad now. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure your headset is fully plugged in and un-muted locally. That's star followed by one for a question. Our first question today comes from Mark Fitzgibbon from Piper Sandler. Mark, please go ahead. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, guys. first, wondered, Avi, I could just, could you just go through your fee income guidance again? I didn't catch all that. Sure. Yep. The guide for this year, Mark, is $35 million-$37 million on fee income. This is the first year that we're going to have a full impact of Durbin. If you remember, starting July 1st, we did have an impact for the second half of this year. Seasonally, Q4 is a little higher with certain fees that we recognize in the fourth quarter. The guidance for next year is really $35 million-$37 million. You know, really expecting good income on the loan swap program that we have and on the SBA side. Our treasury management business really, you know, kicking in on all cylinders at this point. That's going to offset the full year decline for the interchange income there. Really $35 million-$37 million for next year. Okay. I heard your comments on the margin, Avi. Could you help us think at a high level when you think that perhaps the margin kind of bottoms out? Is that, you know, relative to when the Fed is done raising rates or some other metric? Yeah, I think so. What we said in the prepared remarks, Mark, was we do think deposit costs are, you know, gonna continually, you know, increase over the course of the year and probably, you know, stabilize by the back half of this year. you know, what I would point out is when you look at our front book and our back book in terms of loan originations, you know, the front book is coming on, you know, in the low 6s, and the stuff that's amortizing is, you know, around 4.40 for this prior quarter. That's gonna benefit us going forward, obviously. you know, the one part if the Fed does stop hiking, you're gonna see then, you know, the impact of repricing stop and deposit costs overpower for a quarter or two. I'd say, you know, towards the back half of this year, you know, we're highly focused on, you know, stabilizing the NIM. Obviously, you know, we believe, you know, this company should have a NIM in the 3.20%-3.30% area in the medium to longer term. You know, again, it sounds cheap. You know, we've kept DDA at 36%. We're happy with that, and we're, you know, still growing our customer base, you know, at this point in time. Yeah, I think really just a function of deposit costs catching up a little bit and a little bit of lag here, you know, in the first half of this year. Okay. What would you say the spot deposit rates are today? Yeah, we were a little bit over 1% at the end of the year. Okay, great. Just strategically thinking about it, you know, given the funding challenges out there and the fact that you guys aren't wildly overcapitalized, would it make sense to kind of slow loan growth even more? Just kind of slow down the growth in the balance sheet and, you know, protect margin, if you will? Well, I think. Hi, Mark. It's Stu, Lubow. Hey, Stu. I think, you know, we're talking about, you know, mid-single digit growth this year. You know, the last 18 months have been significantly higher than that. You know, we are seeing a moderation in our pipeline, but a big part of our growth in the early part of this year was the multifamily portfolio. That portfolio, we're really just servicing our existing customers and doing swap deals on that portfolio. We don't expect to see any real growth in that portfolio at all for the year. You know, just a natural remixing of the portfolio and our focus on C&I and owner-occupied CRE is gonna result in a moderation in terms of growth. I mean, today we have about a $1.5 billion pipeline at an average yield of 6.28%. Only about $200 million of that is multifamily, and even at that rate, those rates are in the high 5s. We're really not in the market in terms of pricing in that portfolio. We do believe we're gonna have some nice growth. With the C&I business and the owner-occupied CRE comes deposit balances. We're really focused on that. You know, the funding on that is important. We think, you know, growing good, solid business relationship DDA balances within the C&I and owner-occupied sectors of our product mix are very important. We wanna continue to grow that part of the business. Suffice to say, you know, we don't expect to see the significant growth that we had over this year. Yeah. Mark, I just wanna reiterate one of the comments we made up front was if you go back a year, we had significant payoffs in the, in the multifamily portfolio rate. If you just follow the forward rate curve, you know, 12 to 18 months from now, you could again see significant payoffs in that portfolio, which is gonna help with stabilization of the loan-to-deposit ratio over time. We're not seeing it right now because obviously rates are elevated, but, you know, we could see that portfolio pay off at a fast level in 2024. Thank you. Mark, we're gonna continue to do what. You know, from the standpoint of the value of this franchise is building relationships. We're gonna take this opportunity to continue to do that. Thank you. The next question is from Steve Moss from Raymond James. Steve, your line is open. Please go ahead. Good morning. Maybe just starting with credit here. You mentioned that there was an improvement in terms of criticized and classified assets, quarter-over-quarter. Just wondering if you could quantify that and maybe just help us think about the reserve here and the reserve ratio going forward. Yeah. So this quarter, what happened with the reserve was, you know, as part of the merger accounting, we had, you know, set aside, you know, various reserves for various loans at that point. And, you know, some of them were in the criticized classified category, you know, upfront. And over time, we've seen a steady improvement in that. So that drove a part of the release this particular quarter. The other thing that we saw was one of our biggest non-accrual loans, which was on the C&I side, actually moved to accruing status. This quarter, there's probably $1 million of reserve release associated with that. I mean, with our, you know, substandard loans we typically provide disclosures of that in our, you know, 10-K, you know, which will come up in a, in a month's time. Preliminary numbers right now, you know, on those portfolios indicate, you know, continued improvement in those. I mean, we're down significantly since the start of the year. What we did, you go back and look at our old 10-Ks and 10-Qs, we were very conservative when over the course of the pandemic, where we moved a lot of loans that had deferrals in there, and a lot of that's getting a lot better. You know, really, you know, back to the peer group median, if not below the peer group median on criticized classified. Really this quarter it was a couple of specific loans that came out that had specific reserves associated with them. I think just going forward on the reserve, you know, just general rule of thumb is on real estate loans we probably have a, you know, reserve on investor CRE and owner-occupied CRE of around 60 basis points ± on new loan growth. On the C&I side it's, you know, between 1 basis point and 125 basis points basically. On a blended basis it's probably around 80 basis points in terms of the reserve, which is pretty similar to our overall reserve right now, which is 80 basis points. You know, absent any improvement or, you know, worsening of economic conditions and absent any changes in our individually analyzed portfolios, the way you should think about it is if we have loan growth in the future, the provisioning on that should be around 80 basis points given our mix. Okay, great. That's helpful. Then excuse me. Maybe just, you know, following up on funding here. Just curious, you know, obviously marginal funding cost is pretty high here. Just wondering, you know, the longer the curve has moved lower, at what point maybe would you consider, you know, a balance sheet restructuring with your securities portfolio, if at all? Yeah. I mean, I think we look at all uses of capital at all times. You know, I think we're very comfortable where we are. You know, supporting customer growth right now is important for us, but, you know, we look at it all the time. When you look at our securities portfolio, the yield on the securities portfolio is around 1.80. It's a fairly short duration portfolio. It's probably three to four years, you know, over there. I mean, in our math ahead, Steve, is that, you know, if we reprice that whole portfolio to market rate to 1.80 and the market rate for securities right now is 4.25 to 4.50, that's a 35 basis point pickup on the NIM once that whole portfolio reprices. It's something we think about, you know, in conjunction with the buyback in conjunction with loan growth. You know, we feel pretty good about our capital levels at this point, so we do have the flexibility to do various things. Okay, great. Thank you very much. The next question comes from Matthew Breese from Stephens Inc. Matthew, please go ahead. Your line is open. Good morning. Morning. Avi, I just wanted to stay on that point on the securities portfolio. You mentioned the duration and, at least in my model, I'm expecting some roll from securities into loans to help funding. Could you just give me a sense for kind of the quarterly runoff of securities? The duration implies it's just a little bit sharper than what I've modeled. Yeah. We got around $120 million-$130 million of cash flows coming in in 2023, Matt. When we sold our PPP loans a couple of years back, we really put that stuff into Treasuries. Those Treasuries are obviously bullet maturities, two to three years out. We got some big maturities in 2025 and 2026, probably around $300 million over there. It is pretty short on the AFS side just because of the fact of the Treasuries we have. To answer differently, the cash flows aren't coming in because they're Treasuries, but they're all gonna mature, you know, two years out, so there's not a lot left there, in terms of, you know, extension risk on that particular portfolio. Obviously we have a held-to-maturity bucket which, you know, we moved some securities into that, you know, late last year and Q1, you know, to help protect tangible books. The portfolio is fairly well-balanced, 40% held to maturity, 60% AFS, which gives us, you know, the ability to consider various things over time. Okay. you'd mentioned that demand deposits you expect to kind of settle out in the 30% range. you're at 34% today, so obviously there's some implied pressure there. As we think about matching loan growth with deposit- That's not. Matt, we didn't say that. We said our total deposit beta over the cycle would be 30%. I mean, our average DDA was 36% for the fourth quarter, so we don't really expect that or we're not really saying it's gonna go down to 30%. That's not what we said. I'm sorry, I misquoted you. Could you give me some idea where you expect demand deposits to settle out? What's your best guess with that 30% deposit beta? Yeah. I mean, I think, you know, Q4 is a little seasonal for us. You know, at the end of Q4, you know, typically we have municipal deposits come in. This time around, there's a little bit of a delay in the municipal deposits come in. We've seen a strong January in terms of some of the municipal, you know, checking accounts come in which are related to tax receivable money. Look, we're gonna have some pressure on that ratio, but at the same time, you know, we've got, you know, various opportunities at the bank. You know, it's big customers, small customers, and as Kevin said, you know, our lending teams this particular year are gonna be highly focused on gathering deposits. Our treasury management teams are gonna be focused on that. I think, you know, like everybody else in the industry, you know, we had some excess, you know, deposits the last couple of years and put that to work and growing the balance sheet was important. Yeah, I mean it's gonna go down maybe a little bit. It's really hard to predict, you know, where it's gonna go down. We do feel we have a pretty, granular customer base, and everything is relationship based, so that should help us stay well above the peer group in terms of this ratio going forward. Then right now, where are you most competitive in terms of higher rate offers? Is it money market, CDs, you know, high percentage savings accounts? You know, we got a CD product out there for new customers and new money, which is a 4.5% rate. It's a 13-month CD at that point. That's the highest rate that we have out there. Really on the consumer side, we're competitive. On the business side, it's really, you know, customer by customer or relationship by relationship and looking at profitability. Okay. I wanted to get a sense for whether or not... Look, I know your all your non-accruals, your criticized classifieds are all solid. As you kind of step back, you know, are there any kind of underneath the hood credit cracks materializing across any of the portfolios? It just feels rather Pollyannaish for us to, you know, go through this level of interest rate hike and then mix shift and cap rates without really any material credit deterioration. You know, Matt, I hear what you're saying, we, you know, we are laser-focused, we, you know, we've had this conversation, I guess, over the last three quarters as to, you know, do we think, you know, there's gonna be a crack in credit? You know, we're very watchful of it. At this point, we're not seeing it. I mean, I think, you know, the positive side of our portfolio, we talked about the multifamily being, you know, having a low LTV at 57%. The average debt service coverage on that portfolio is about 1.43. The total CRE, you know, owner, investor CRE for LTV is also 57% with an average debt service coverage of 1.78. I, you know, I think from a credit standpoint, while we're always concerned, and, you know, certainly as rates have gone up, we're concerned about stress on different parts of the portfolio. I would say, you know, we're really not seeing any significant material stress in any product line. I would say probably the only area that, you know, some of the weaker customers would be the SBA business, all right. You know, that's a small part of our book. Those customers, you know, are, some of those customers will struggle with, you know, floating rates getting to the level they are today. Understood. Okay. Yeah, Matt, the one area I'd point out is, as you know, when we put the companies together, we were able to really look at individual credits. I think the one difference with our reserves that we've always said versus a peer group is there's a significant portion of it that's ascribed to individually analyzed loans. Within the $83 odd million that we have, there's probably $31 million that's for individual credits. We know what credits are on the weaker side, and we've got significant reserves associated with them, and we're able to do that as part of the merger accounting. I think we've-- as opposed to people who have everything in a pool reserve, I think the difference with them is if something goes bad, then, you know, they're gonna have to start putting up reserves for those. I think we try to identify everything that may or could have an issue, be conservative around it, and already set those aside. That's what you saw this quarter, right? You saw some stuff improve, and that's why the reserve was close, the provision was close to 0 even though we had significant loan growth. Just something else to think about. Yeah ...as you do the modeling. Virtually everything that we, you know, that we have charged off this year, was previously identified as part of the merger, and we took the mark. You know, it's, you know, the due diligence we did early on, you know, proved to be correct. You know, we really haven't seen any new credits, significant new credits come to us as a problem. Great. Understood. That's all I have. Thanks for taking my questions. As a reminder, if you'd like to ask a question today, that's star 1 on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Manuel Navas from D.A. Davidson. Manuel, your line is open. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. With your outlook of trying to stay below, 108% loan-to-deposit ratio, what's kinda like the thinking on how quickly you might approach that? Would that be something that could happen? Yeah. Sure. next quarter Yes. Just kind of any color there? No. I think what we're trying to say with that is, you know, pipeline, like Stu said, is really strong at this point, right? I mean, we've built a lot of business over the course of 2022, we, you know, have a line of sight here on the loan portfolio in the first half of the year. You know, at any point in time, again, I mean, people think about a loan-to-deposit as a period-end number, right? You know, we've got some seasonality in the deposits, like escrow deposits, for example, that could stay, you know, for the whole quarter but then go out at the end of the quarter. I think we just wanna have some guardrails around which we operate. You know, loan growth is probably gonna be stronger in the first half of the year than the second half of the year. You know, I think again, we're focused. Again, Kevin said this too, we're back in the consumer market for competitively priced deposits. It's not a, you know, per quarter, per month thing, but we just wanna stay under that threshold for this year. Yeah. I also think it's important to understand that we're gonna continue to remix the portfolio out of the multifamily business, and into, you know, the areas where we've really grown capabilities in terms of middle market C&I, owner occupied CRE. You, you should expect and could expect to see multifamily as a percentage of the total, significantly reduce over the next several years. Obviously what that does is improve our NIM because we're getting 50 to 100 basis points better yield on the non-multifamily part of the portfolio. Of course, deposits come along with the C&I and relationship business. I appreciate that. I think that's gonna be my next question about mix and growth. It's gonna be definitely more C&I. Could you give what proportion of the pipeline is C&I at the moment? Yeah. Of that, $1.5 billion, approximately 40% is C&I and owner-occupied CRE. I appreciate that color. Is there, I know that you don't like to give kind of near-term NIM expectations, but anything you can give on like directionality and kind of success of your current offers in the marketplace to help stabilize funding? Yeah, sure. In, you know, in terms of consumer deposits, we've, you know, we have some offers out there, at the start of this year, and, you know, we've already raised $75 million in deposits on that. I think, you know, falling back to the loan to deposit ratio question, I mean, that's a market that we can access. We've seen a lot of banks do it. It's gonna be a mix between CDs and, you know, competitive savings, products. I think the one disclosure we always like pointing the analysts to is if you look at our, you know, prior 10-Ks and 10-Qs, Manuel, on the economic value of equity, and you go back to, you know, the start of the year, you know, look at our 10-K, our EVE was around $1.2 billion at that point in time. You look at what we had in our September disclosures, it was around $1.7 billion-$1.8 billion. What that's really telling you is that the present value of the cash flows of the assets and liabilities, once they go through their full cycle, which is, you know, over a DCF model over three to five years, you know, our own models are saying the bank is worth $400 million-$500 million more, right? That doesn't show up in a quarterly NIM number because your NIM can go up and down in any particular quarter. I think, you know, looking at those EVE numbers provides you some directional analysis of the franchise value in the company. Obviously in our next 10-K, you'll see the next EVE number come out. What do you assume are the ranges for your non-interest-bearing deposit balance in that calculation? If that could shift that pretty widely, correct? Yep. No, absolutely. It's a, you know, projection over the course of five years, right? You know. Yep ... we see some attrition then when we model that based on recent history of what we're seeing. Like Kevin said, our non-interest-bearing, our average non-interest-bearing deposits for the fourth quarter was 36%. I mean, we have escrow deposits that we pay out at the end of the year, so the spot balance is always kind of, you know, misleading. You know, I mean, we were 37%, you know, when we went into the cycle and we're 36% right now. We've done a really nice job keeping it there. I think, you know, like Kevin said, all our goals are really focused on deposits and growing deposits this year. You know, some level of that we, you know, obviously model certain level of betas in there. As I said, you know, we always do our IRR modeling with around 30% betas, and that's kind of what's in there. I think in the near term, yeah, sure, you could see, you know, people move out of DDA into interest-bearing deposits. Over time, once the Fed starts cutting rates again, you could see a migration back into DDA there as well. Okay. That color is really helpful. Thank you. The next question is from Christopher O'Connell from KBW. Chris, please go ahead. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. Appreciate the expense guide. Was hoping to just get a little bit of color, you know, given, you know, the first quarter seasonality, especially in the comp line, with some of the things you mentioned as to, you know, maybe where the starting point is, you know, for the year and then, you know, how the cadence kind of progresses, you know, from there? Of course, I think we typically shouldn't see too much seasonality with our numbers. We try to accrue, you know, and pretty much, you know, true up, you know, towards the end of the year. You know, there's some banks that have a significant amount of seasonality. Probably a little bit less for us. I would say, you know, in general, we kind of met all the goals we set out at the start of the year, so we should be okay on that. I think, you know, we try to focus on the, on the full year number because again, there could be movements up and down. I mean, you are right, you know, Q1 sometimes a little bit more, but not too much more for us. You know, I think within the 206-209, like I said, you know, we got the FDIC and we got, you know, some, you know, items for the pension, which, you know, hopefully are not recurring for 2024, right? Twenty twenty-three is a little bit of a abnormal year. There's also some investments that we're making in our digital platforms that are part of that. You know, in addition to that, there's, you know, employee costs and, you know, just the cost of running our business. You know, nothing too much out of the ordinary for us, but, you know, we hope to come in, you know, in line or better than that 206-209 for the full year, like we did for the last two years. Got it. That pension comes in, you know, adds, half a million dollars to the quarterly run rate starting in the first quarter? Yeah. I mean, the way the pension works is you get an estimate at the start of the year, you accrue for the whole year in certain run rate, and then you do a true up at the end of the year. That would kind of be straight line. Correct. Exactly. Okay, great. just given the updated outlook, you know, on the margin, in the near term here for the, you know, first part of the year, how do you guys feel about the sub 50% efficiency ratio target? Yeah, I mean, look, we can control the things we can, right? When you focus on expense to assets, we were at 1.55%, you know, this past quarter. I think, you know, being there or being better than that, you know, is a goal of the company, and we're highly focused on that. I think when you think about the efficiency ratio, you go back to, you know, when we put the two companies together and our goal was to be at sub 50%. I think we've, I mean, apart from the first quarter, I think we've beaten that every single quarter. Some quarters we operate at 44%. This past quarter was 47%, right? Look, every quarter, you know, may go up or down, but I think in the medium to longer term, we definitely wanna be a sub 50% efficiency ratio bank, which we've definitely demonstrated over the course of the last 24 months. Great. As far as just, you know, the loan growth, you guys, you know, seem to have, you know, a robust pipeline still, especially, you know, outlook for the first half of the year. Where are you guys seeing the biggest opportunity for growth? Are you getting any kickback from your customers, you know, on a, on the higher rates, you know, on the, on the new originations? You know, the, you know, the real opportunity for us is and what we've really focused on, as I said, is the C&I and the owner-occupied CRE, because those are relationship businesses. You know, you saw significant growth in C&I. I mean, today, the weighted average rate on that part of the portfolio with the pipeline is 7.44%. You know, the fact is we're able to, you know, with our new teams, bring on business at these rates. You know, we're still conservative underwriters. On the CRE and the investor CRE, you know, we're maintaining our debt service coverage ratios even at these interest rates, which are basically our rack rates on investor CRE is about six and five-eighths today. You know, again, we're very comfortable with where we are. We're able to develop new relationships and new business even within this higher rate environment. I think the fact that we are, you know, a local community commercial bank, building relationships is the key. You know, the banks that we're taking the business from are larger and, you know, it provides us an opportunity to provide the personal service and the attention that these customers desire. We can do it competitively with all their products that and services that a larger commercial bank has. I mean, that's our opportunity and, you know, to date, you know, we've been able to accomplish that. I mean, just in the fourth quarter alone, we, while we had $450 million in, in net growth, we had $680 million in total originations at the, you know, the high fives in terms of yield. You know, you know, the fact is, you know, we've been able to really improve our yields and grow the business even during these higher rate times. Got it. Appreciate the color. Thanks for taking my questions. Thanks, Chris. We have a follow-up from Steve Moss of Raymond James. Steve, please go ahead. Your line is open. Yes, just two follows for me. Maybe just going back to funding costs here. Just curious kind of what the maturity schedule is on the CD portfolio and kind of, you know, think about how we think about that rate pricing up here going forward? Yeah. I mean, we used to, you know, provide some disclosure in our press release on the CD portfolio. Maybe we'll put that back. There's around $600 million that we have. You know, I'd say the biggest piece is in the month of May, where we have around $100 million of CDs. The rate on that's around 3%. You know, I'd say $600 million of that is this year, and the rate on that's around, you know, 150-155. You know, the item with that is generally on our CD portfolio, we see retention rates of around 65%-70%, based on current rack rates. The remaining 35% of it, you're gonna have to go out in the market and fund at a higher rate. In the near term, you're gonna see some, you know, deposit cost increase because CDs are pricing up as stuff rolls off. What we've done, and I've mentioned this in the script, was, we're trying to keep everything fairly short so that when the Fed does drop rates, we're not stuck with 24, 36 month maturities over there. Everything's generally fairly short on the CD portfolio. Okay. That's helpful. Maybe just, you know, on M&A here, just kind of curious, any updated thoughts you guys may have in terms of, you know, level of discussions and you know, your appetite for a transaction here? I think we've been talking about this for the last several quarters. We are focused on the organic opportunities in front of us. You know, this is certainly a challenging environment to think about that. You know, we have demonstrated that, putting these two companies together, we're in a position to do something if it was available. Really the focus for us is continuing to grow in this marketplace, taking advantage of our position here, and, as Stu has shown you on the pipeline, that there's plenty of opportunities for us to continue to grow our franchise organically. Great. Thank you very much, Kevin. As a final reminder, that's star one to ask a question today. As we have no further questions, I'll hand back to the management team for any concluding remarks. Just final thoughts. I think we're proud of what we accomplished in 2022. On behalf of the board, I want to thank the whole Dime team for what they've done, the efforts and the focus. You know, I know there's a lot of questions about margin, but we believe the value of the business model that we have, seeking customer strong relationships, the conservative credit philosophy, it's a model that worked for Bridge Bancorp. It worked for the team that Stu brought on from Dime. What we've done, the near term challenges we managed, as the entire balance sheet adjust to the current rate environment. Organizations like ours, with superior funding bases, will ultimately succeed. Again, I wanna thank everybody for their interest and questions today, and look forward to if you have any follow-up to please give us a call. This concludes today's call. Thank you very much for your attendance. You may now disconnect your lines.