Hello, and welcome to the 3D Systems conference call and audio webcast to discuss the results of the third quarter 2021. My name is Kevin, and I'll facilitate the audio portion of today's interactive broadcast. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to John Nypaver, Vice President, Treasurer, and Investor Relations for 3D Systems. Please go ahead, John. Thank you, Kevin. Good morning, and welcome to 3D Systems conference call. With me on the call are Dr. Jeffrey Graves, our President and Chief Executive Officer, Jagtar Narula, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Andrew Johnson, Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer. The webcast portion of this call contains a slide presentation that we will refer to during the call. Those following along on the phone who wish to access the slide portion of this presentation may do so on the investor relations section of our website. For those who have accessed the streaming portion of the webcast, please be aware that there may be a few seconds delay and that you will not be able to pose questions via the web. The following discussion and responses to your questions reflect management's views as of today only and will include forward-looking statements as described on this slide. Actual results may differ materially. Additional information about factors that could potentially impact our financial results is included in last night's press release and our filings with the SEC, including our most recent annual report on the Form 10-K and quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. During this call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. In our press release and slides accompanying this webcast, which are both available on our investor relations website, you will find additional disclosures regarding these non-GAAP measures, including reconciliations of these measures with comparable GAAP measures. Finally, unless otherwise stated, all comparisons in this call will be against our results for the comparable period of 2020. Now, I am pleased to turn the call over to Jeffrey Graves, our CEO. Jeff? Thanks, John, and good morning, everyone. I'll open today's call with a phrase that I'm sure many of you are saying to yourself each morning as well, and that's, "Wow, what a difference a year makes." At this time last year, we were seeing only the very beginning of what we all hoped would be a sustained recovery from the worst of the COVID pandemic. At the same time, here at 3D Systems, we were in the midst of executing our four-phased transformation journey. We reorganized our company into two segments, Healthcare and Industrial Solutions. We had restructured our organization to gain efficiencies, and we had announced the first of our divestitures of non-core assets. As we speak to you today, a year later, these first three phases are complete. We're now a company that's singularly focused on additive manufacturing with a lean, nimble operating structure, global reach, and breadth of metal, polymer, and biological technologies that's unparalleled in the industry. These attributes brought together through an intense focus on our customers' most demanding applications has proven to be a powerful driver of value creation as reflected clearly in our organic growth rates, our profitability, and our operating cash performance, all of which we will recap for you in a few moments. While we're pleased with this performance, even more exciting is that we're now in the fourth and final stage of our transformation, namely investing for growth. Since last quarter, we completed the last of our divestitures, retiring our debt and stockpiling over $500 million of cash on the balance sheet. We subsequently announced two acquisitions that embody our strategic focus on growth, which is to invest in businesses that drive the adoption of additive manufacturing, solve customers' most complex application needs, and generate high-margin recurring revenue streams that are critical to sustained value creation. The first of these acquisitions was Oqton, a unique software company that's emerged as a recognized leader in the creation of a new breed of intelligent, cloud-based manufacturing operating system. The driver for this acquisition is very simple. Customers across our industrial and healthcare segments are now anxious to accelerate their adoption of additive manufacturing in full-scale production environments. In doing so, they're facing significant challenges in how to incorporate these technologies into their existing enterprise systems. To date, they've relied heavily on spreadsheets and highly skilled engineers to run production applications. This is obviously too slow, too inefficient, and too expensive to scale as production volumes ramp up. While we and others have made strides in optimizing and to some extent automating the performance of single printer or even a collection of like-kind printers working in parallel, our customers' challenges extend well beyond this. What they need is a manufacturing system that can easily and intelligently incorporate a mixed fleet of printers, often from a variety of manufacturers, and in addition, one that will incorporate all of the surrounding digital production systems on the shop floor, such as post-print thermal or mechanical processing, robotic motion systems, and automated inspection systems. Oqton not only provides this linkage, it goes a step further in applying cloud-based AI to optimize the entire workflow, then links this workflow to the customer's existing enterprise software, such as those provided by Salesforce, Oracle, Microsoft, or SAP. The end result is that Oqton not only links, optimizes, and tracks a customer's unique operational workflow at an individual component level from raw material to finished and inspected parts, but it also builds in future flexibility to substitute new printing, finishing, and automation technologies that will undoubtedly be introduced in the years ahead. These attributes which are unique to the Oqton platform will remove a significant barrier to the large-scale adoption of additive manufacturing in production environments. For that reason, we've opened the system to the entire industry, which we hope will accelerate market growth for everyone. In addition, for the first time in our history, we will now make available our full complement of market-leading metal and polymer printing software platforms to all others in the industry, which we hope will accelerate the introduction of new printing technologies to customers around the world. Importantly, as with all software platforms that span an entire industry, we are committed to Oqton continuing to operate in its model of independence with a supreme commitment to customer data protection and confidentiality. I'm happy to tell you that we closed the Oqton acquisition on November first, and the reception by our customers and partners alike has been very positive. Before I move to our most recent and incredibly exciting acquisition, let me step back and explain how we look at our company holistically, which I believe is much different than others in this industry. In the decades since 3D printing was invented, we and our competitors have routinely defined ourselves as hardware and material developers with our products sold broadly to customers around the world. While this is natural when any industry is young and when the product is mainly consumed in small quantities by labs or prototype facilities, as the industry now matures and production environments are targeted, successful companies will need to adapt their entire operating model to reflect their deepening integration with specific markets and customers. If you don't, you will remain simply a vendor and not a true partner to your customers, which will ultimately be reflected in your organic growth rate and profit margins. With this in mind, at 3D Systems, beginning a year ago, we changed the way we defined ourselves by reorganizing our entire company around key markets, and within those markets, key vertical segments that we believe will derive the most value from their adoption of additive manufacturing. We began with the creation of two business segments, healthcare and industrial solutions. Using a strong application focus, these two businesses each integrate our printer material and software technologies in unique combinations to solve a customer's product need. Once complete, our customers can then ask us to scale the process for them to a certain production level, and then with increasing demand, they can elect to have us enable a manufacturer of their choosing to continue scaling to high volumes. This transfer of the workflow involves providing printing systems, materials, and software along with the process definition. It results in a seamless transfer of capability to the chosen manufacturer, whether it's the OEM themselves or a contract manufacturer of their choosing. Fast-forwarding to this year, with the acquisition of Oqton, we expanded our software capabilities into what we call broadly digital manufacturing software, which as we described earlier, enables a rapid and efficient adoption of additive manufacturing in high volume production environments. This operating model has been very well received by our customer base, and we expect it to fuel exciting organic growth in the years ahead. Most recently, we've added a strong biotech organizational focus and invested significantly to bring our emerging biological technologies to laboratory and human applications, details of which we'll cover in a few moments. In short, these are our five core market segments that you'll hear us talk about moving forward. While each of the five will adapt to the needs of their customers, each will also leverage our core technologies of hardware, software, and materials in the unique manner needed to fulfill their customer application needs. Let me illustrate this approach using our healthcare business as an example. In the mid-1990s, 3D Systems pioneered medical modeling, which is the printing of highly detailed anatomical models from digital images. These models have proven instrumental in support of complex surgical procedures. In a highly publicized application of our modeling technology, which was beautifully documented by CNN's Dr. Sanjay Gupta, we created a number of medical models to assist in the separation of conjoined twins, Jadon and Anias McDonald, who were born with the extremely rare craniopagus condition in which twins are joined at the head, sharing not only the skull and vasculature, but portions of the brain itself. The modeling used for this surgical planning was vital to the success of Dr. James Goodrich and his team that they had in separating the twins, both of which are alive and living independently today many years later. To date, our medical modeling technology has supported dozens of similarly complex operations around the world, along with hundreds of others, and it continues to expand each year. Building upon this foundation and investing in point-of-care infrastructure that accompanied its growth, we deepened our surgical support over the next decade, and by 2005, we were working with surgeons to design and manufacture customized patient-specific surgical guides and instruments using 3D printing. As this portion of the business in turn grew, we expanded our scope once again, this time to include actual patient-specific implants, which offered an even larger market opportunity. Fast forward to today, we offer the broadest range of FDA-cleared capabilities for modeling, surgical planning, and patient-specific medical implants, which inspires our customers to continue expanding their partnership with us year after year. While we're very proud of our progress by now redefining ourselves as a healthcare business in this example and leveraging both our critical infrastructure and channel partner relationships, we can broaden our scope more aggressively to now include other parts of the human skeleton structure. Importantly, to advance these applications in parallel instead of in series as we have in the past. This provides us the opportunity to bring benefits to a much larger patient population and at a much higher rate than ever before. This is the power of redefining ourselves as a healthcare business and not simply a provider of printing technology to healthcare customers in the market. Of note, our healthcare business grew over 28% in our most recent quarter and over 44% on an organic basis, which is where we disregard the businesses that we have divested. This remarkable growth rate is a testament to our increasing momentum in this exciting market. Building upon this discussion of our healthcare business, I'd like to end my commentary for today on the remarkable emerging market of bioprinting and our announcement last week of our acquisition of Volumetric Biotechnologies. This company, under the inspired leadership of Dr. Jordan Miller, brings specific expertise in biomaterials and regenerative medicine that combines synthetic chemistry, 3D printing, microfabrication, and molecular imaging to direct cultured human cells to form more organized, complex organizations of living vessels and tissues. 3D Systems has been a pioneer in our industry by focusing resources on regenerative medicine since 2017 when we began a joint development program with United Therapeutics Corporation to develop the capability to print scaffolds for human lungs using a process we call Print to Perfusion. Once developed, this bioprinting technology can be applied to other major organs in the human body, as well as a wide range of other human and laboratory applications. We've made significant strides in this unique technology, and as a result, we recently announced an expansion of our development program with United Therapeutics, an expansion that includes increased funding and an extension to two additional organs. This program expansion reflects the progress that our joint team has made in this groundbreaking endeavor. By acquiring Volumetric, we're adding critical skill sets to our 3D Systems team, which we feel are a perfect complement to ours, bringing strong biological expertise and cellular engineering skills along with highly creative bioprinting systems to our development group. As I realize this is an entirely new area for many that have followed our company for some time, let me quickly recap our regenerative medicine strategy and the market opportunities that we're addressing through our unique bioprinting technology. The first opportunity is the printing of human organs, beginning with the lung and expanding from there to two additional organs. We're pursuing this as a joint program with our partner, United Therapeutics. The ambitious goals that we've set for this program are driving quantum advances in our technology and laying the foundation for the rest of our regenerative medicine efforts. In our second regenerative medicine market opportunity, we're taking the core, unique, disruptive technologies developed for the bioprinting of human organs and applying it to other parts of the human body. There are a tremendous number of these applications, ranging from the printing of human skin for burn victims, to soft tissue for breast reconstruction and repair, to critical blood vessel and bone replacements, and many, many more. We're now forming partnerships focused on each application area where we can combine our bioprinting expertise with the appropriate application experts to provide unique and highly impactful solutions for people in need. We refer to this second market vertical within regenerative medicine as human non-organ bioprinting. Our last, but certainly not least market opportunity is to extend our bioprinting technologies into research labs, providing advanced printing systems and unique biological materials to those that study the basic science of regenerative medicine, and in the pharmaceutical laboratories, where the ability to print high-precision, three-dimensional vascularized cell structures can be used for the development of new, more effective drug therapies. Our acquisition of Volumetric and their unique capabilities in combination with our own will allow us to expand the pace of our efforts in all three of our regenerative medicine markets. It amazes me to think of these revolutionary applications enabled by our 3D printing technologies, applications that we are uniquely positioned to deliver with our extensive history in advanced 3D printing technologies, our material expertise, our application development expertise, our deep understanding of FDA and other regulatory processes, and now our biological and cellular engineering capabilities. We believe that in the years to come, bioprinting will take its place as a very significant business for our company, bringing critical relief to patients in need of life-saving procedures and great value to our company's employees and our shareholders alike. Moving from our strategic growth investments to our most recent quarterly performance, I'm very pleased to say that we've continued to execute well on our core business. With continuing strong demand, our operational challenges have largely centered around global supply chain and logistics issues, which unfortunately continue to plague most companies around the world. Our solid execution in the face of these challenges in the third quarter resulted in strong double-digit growth, with revenues increasing by 15% before adjusting for divestitures. When these adjustments are made, which is a much better reflection of our core business performance, revenues were up over 36% versus 2020 and up over 20% versus our pre-pandemic 2019 third quarter, a benchmark we consider very important. Looking at our major business segments, our Industrial Solutions segment is continuing its rebound, seeing strong performance, particularly in jewelry, automotive and transportation, and general manufacturing. In Healthcare, we see continuing strong demand for personalized health services as well as solid performance in dental. As Jagtar will discuss shortly, in addition to this strong revenue performance, our EBITDA climbed by over 125%. We generated positive cash from operations for the fourth consecutive quarter, the first time this has happened in four years. With our cash generation, in addition to the proceeds from divestitures, we built a sizable cash balance by the end of Q3. A portion of these funds will be used to fund the strategic growth initiatives I mentioned earlier, but we will still be left with a significant amount of liquidity to pursue additional opportunities. As I'm sure is clear to everyone, I am very excited not only about what we've accomplished this last year, but even more so about the future, as our focus on growth in this final stage of our transformation has only just begun. With that, let me turn the call over to Jagtar, who will now describe our third quarter results in more detail. Jagtar? Thanks, Jeff. Good morning, everyone. For the third quarter, we reported revenue of $156.1 million, an increase of 14.6% compared to the third quarter of 2020. Our organic revenue growth, which excludes divestitures completed in 2020 and 2021, was 35.9% in Q3 2021 versus Q3 2020. Since the third quarter of 2020 was the beginning of the economic reopening from the COVID-related shutdowns, we think it is valuable to compare our results to Q3 2019, which was untainted by the pandemic. Again, excluding divested businesses, we are comparing on an apples-to-apples basis. Our revenue in the third quarter of 2021 was 21.2% higher than pre-pandemic Q3 2019. As we have discussed previously, with the completion of our Simbionix and on-demand manufacturing divestitures in Q3 2021, we have completed our planned divestitures and are now focused on the performance, growth, and investment of our core additive manufacturing business. I would like to note that post-divestitures, we continue to generate nearly two-thirds of our revenue from our recurring revenue streams. These high-margin lines of business highlight the strength and diversity of our core business, our ability to weather various economic cycles, and around which we will continue to make strategic investments. Turning to earnings, we reported GAAP net income of $2.34 per share in the third quarter of 2021, compared to a GAAP loss of $0.61 in the third quarter of 2020. The year-over-year improvement was driven by gains on divested businesses as well as the goodwill impairment charge we took in the third quarter of 2020. For our non-GAAP results, we reported non-GAAP income of $0.08 per share in the third quarter of 2021, compared to a non-GAAP loss of $0.03 per share in the third quarter of 2020. The year-over-year improvement reflects higher revenue with lower non-GAAP operating expense as a result of the cost actions we took last year. Now I will discuss revenue by market. Healthcare grew 28.3% year-over-year and decreased 7.8% compared to last quarter. The decrease was primarily a result of the divestiture of the Simbionix medical simulation business during the quarter. Adjusted for divestitures, Healthcare revenue increased 44.5% year-over-year as a result of strong demand for dental applications in both printers and materials. In fact, the last four quarters have seen the highest level ever of dental material sales as compared to any prior four-quarter period. Our Industrial segment generated revenue growth of 4% to $79.7 million compared to the same period last year and was flat to last quarter, reflecting the divestiture of the on-demand manufacturing parts business during the quarter. Adjusted for divestitures, Industrial revenue increased 28.1% year-over-year and 2.1% over the last quarter. The increase was driven by higher demand in both printers and materials in a variety of sub-segments, most notably jewelry, automotive, and transportation, and general manufacturing. Now we turn to gross margin. We reported gross profit margin of 41.2% in the third quarter of 2021 compared to 43.1% in the third quarter of 2020. Non-GAAP gross profit margin was 41.5% compared to 43.2% in the same period last year. Gross profit margin decreased primarily as a result of businesses divested in 2020 and 2021. If we exclude the impact of those divestitures, gross margins increased 80 basis points in the third quarter of 2021 compared to the same period last year, driven by 2020 cost actions and higher revenue, which resulted in better capacity utilization. As evidenced by our strong performance this year, demand continues to be strong for our products in both business segments. The biggest challenge we face isn't unique to 3D Systems. We are all aware of the supply chain issues that are affecting everyone, from multinational corporations to small businesses to individuals on Main Street. In fact, our Q3 revenue, while strong, was impacted by supply limitations on certain products. Consistent with last quarter, we continue to see a tightening of cost and availability for certain components that go into our products. Our team is doing a heroic job as it manages through these challenges. Supply chain and not end customer demand remains the key headwind in our business, and it's our strong focus as we finish out the year. We have taken steps to mitigate the economic impact, such as adding alternative sources for key components where possible. We have seen some cost impacts from the supply chain constraints, especially in increased freight charges, and have instituted a temporary surcharge for our customers on certain types of purchases effective in the fourth quarter. Year to date, our non-GAAP gross profit margin was 42.6%, and we expect full year gross profit margins to be between 41% and 43%. Operating expenses for this quarter were $81.5 million on a GAAP basis, a decrease of 35.4% compared to the third quarter of 2020. This year-over-year decrease reflects a goodwill impairment booked in Q3 2020. Our non-GAAP operating expenses in the third quarter were $54.1 million, an 8% decrease from the third quarter of the prior year. Compared to second quarter of 2021, non-GAAP operating expenses decreased 2%, primarily driven by lower R&D spend. Adjusted EBITDA, defined as non-GAAP operating profit plus depreciation, was $16.3 million or 10.5% of revenue, compared to $7.2 million or 5.3% of revenue in the third quarter of 2020. Our disciplined approach to growth, cost management, and focus on our core business is resulting in continued strong adjusted EBITDA. Turning to the cash flow statement and balance sheet, we are pleased to show $502.8 million of cash on the balance sheet, an increase of $418.4 million since the beginning of the year. The increase was primarily driven by proceeds from the divestitures of the on-demand parts business and our medical simulation business, but supported in no small part by our extremely strong cash generation from operations. During the quarter, we generated $20.7 million of cash from operations, marking the fourth straight quarter of positive cash from operations. This is the first time in four years the company has achieved four straight quarters of positive operating cash flow and reflects the strong transformation of our business. Now that we have demonstrated consistent profitability and cash generation and post-divestiture have half a billion dollars of cash on hand, we are in a prime position to continue growing the company by taking a disciplined approach to invest in organic and inorganic solutions that will solve customers' complex needs, drive adoption of additive manufacturing, and generate high margin recurring revenue streams. We have previously announced some of those growth opportunities, namely our acquisitions of Oqton, which closed November 1, and Volumetric Biotechnologies, which is expected to close in the fourth quarter. The cash considerations for these will total approximately $130 million, leaving roughly $370 million of cash. These acquisitions will position the company for strong growth and are core to our strategies in both high margin software to enable the adoption of additive manufacturing, as well as adoption of advanced 3D printing technologies in the field of regenerative medicine, where we believe we will be a leader in the market. As I conclude my remarks, I want to reflect on the past year. I joined the company at the beginning of the third quarter of 2020. At that time, the company was just beginning its transformation. We had just announced results for the second quarter of 2020 that included negative operating cash flow of $21 million for the first half of that year, cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet of only $64 million, and $22 million of debt. Now, fast-forward to this year and the transformation we've been through. We have generated over $60 million of operating cash this year through the third quarter and ended the quarter with over $500 million of cash and cash equivalents with no debt. We are 100% focused on additive manufacturing and growing strongly in our core markets. We are able to make smart and strategic investments to support our core business and are rapidly advancing our key technologies into new segments such as regenerative medicine. I continue to believe that we are uniquely positioned in our industry with a strong balance sheet, growth, cash generation, and a suite of technologies that continue to be in demand by our customers. Finally, we wanted to provide an update on our Investor Day event. You may recall that we had scheduled an event for September ninth in the Denver, Colorado area. Out of an abundance of caution for the safety of our investors, analysts, and employees, we postponed the planned Investor Day as COVID infection rates increased this past summer due to the Delta variant. We are now seeing the hopeful signs of progress with once again declining infection rates, rollout of booster shots, and a newly announced pill that seems to offer promise of dramatically cutting the hospitalization rates from this infection. As a result, we are in the early stages of planning an updated Investor Day with an aim for the first half of 2022. We will provide an update as soon as possible and look forward to sharing our long-term growth strategy in more detail with the investing community. With that, I'll turn the call back to Jeff. Jeff? Thanks, Jagtar. Both Jagtar and I have covered the remarkable progress that we've made over the last year. We've created value for our investors, our customers, and our employees by remaking the business. Our growth and profitability distinguishes us in the industry and has made us a key partner for a growing number of organizations that are considering additive manufacturing. At the same time, our transformation has also made us a more exceptional place to work to drive the future of additive manufacturing. As a result, more talented individuals are becoming a part of the new 3D Systems each day. However, as much as we've accomplished this last year, it's more about the future. We will continue to be a valuable solutions partner with customers and deeply integrate with them as they adopt our solutions and technologies. We'll also invest in our business and drive our solutions capabilities in the five key areas I spoke about earlier. I'm truly excited about the depth and breadth of technology we bring to our markets and application expertise. With that, I'll now open it up for questions. Kevin? Thank you. We'll now be conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to be placed in the question queue, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing star one. One moment please while we poll for questions. Our first question today is coming from Troy Jensen from Lake Street Capital. Your line is now live. Hey, gentlemen. Congrats on great results here. Thanks, Troy. Hey, I guess for you, Jeff, I want to ask a few questions. I did miss the Volumetric call. I guess, could you talk a little bit? We got an email from John about this, and he talked about three facets for this space that you guys look at. It's organ printing, non-organ printing, and then lab and research work. Correct. I guess I don't want you to size them, but can you prioritize which one's bigger here as far as I guess when I think about bio- Yeah I really think about the materials are really the key secret sauce and maybe the bioprinters are less. Help me out with kind of prioritizing which facets are most important. Yeah, it's those are two interesting questions, Troy. Let me talk about both of them. I'll start with the second one, actually. The printing technology itself. Troy, I got to tell you, it's remarkable. You know, we started this work back in 2017, frankly speaking, thinking that it was impossible to get to the resolution required for printing a lung scaffold. I mean, you're talking about micron-level detail in an extremely complex structure to build a scaffold, and it's a large scaffold. You know, you think of the size of a human lung. So the intricacy, the complexity, and the fine detail are really, really hard. Remember, you're doing it with biomaterials. You're doing it with materials that are the basic building blocks of your body, of a human body, materials that have rarely been printed before. All of that technology, it took us a few years to really evolve that technology to the remarkable level it is today. That's what gave confidence to us, United Therapeutics, that we could now expand that into other human organs. I wouldn't underestimate the printer technology. To be honest with you, we not only were inventing it newly for bioprinting, but we were leveraging some of the work we had done in photopolymer printing technologies as well along the way, which was really helpful. That's the kind of synergy, technology synergy we see going forward, which is really beneficial. From a material standpoint, these are unique materials and we will continue to evolve unique biological materials. Part of the driver in acquiring Volumetric was that they have the biological expertise that we really needed. They have excellent printer expertise as well, but they've approached it from the biology standpoint. They have cellular engineering and biology expertise that if we're really going to grow in this space, we needed to bring in-house. We can now use it not only for organ printing, but to leverage into non-organ parts of the human body, and then also laboratory applications. Remarkable technology, Troy. When these organs and non-organ articles are built for your body, they're largely constructed from a patient's own cells in the end, so they're fully biocompatible. They're meant to survive in your body for, you know, your entire lifetime without the need for immunosuppressant drugs, which is an ongoing issue for transplant patients today. We're tremendously excited and that organ printing effort is driving a lot of the core technology that we're taking into these other markets for non-organ printing and for labs. In terms of the size of the markets, Troy, they're emerging markets, it's very hard to get your arms around the size and scale of it. If you just strictly look at the number of organ transplants, for example, today that are done, the list is kept very small on purpose because there's so few organs to go around. You can put dollar estimates on the number of organs, but the market itself will expand to millions and millions of patients. Obviously, it's a very high-value article, and it avoids spending a lot of money on traditional transplant and medication. We believe it's a highly valuable, highly differentiated product you're providing into a market that'll be measured in billions. When you go to non-organ applications, I'd say the equivalent. It's hard to estimate, but you think of skin, arteries, soft tissue implants around your body, it's going to, again, amount to, you know, billions of dollars of market size. I'd say the same in laboratory, maybe a bit smaller. What we've said is a $1 billion-plus market for laboratory applications. We're really excited about research labs. It's a great business. We acquired Allevi early in the year, and Allevi had a really nice footprint in research labs. They're in over 300 research labs around the world. That's the way you really develop a lot of the science of regenerative medicine. You wanna be in with those guys, selling them printers and consumable materials. The real market we're excited about beyond that, just from a dollar standpoint, and the benefits it bring is in drug therapy, so pharmaceuticals. The ability to print 3D cellular structures that have blood vessels in them, so you flow blood through them, allow pharmaceutical companies to test drugs more quickly. They no longer have to, you know, jump from an animal to a full-scale person. They can test it in the laboratory, but with real human biological cells and blood flowing through them in an architected way, a reproducible way. We see the benefits there as tremendous. It'll be in providing printers and materials. It may actually be in doing some of the testing eventually as well. It's gonna be, I believe, a marvelous business for us that again, I would put, you know, a billion-dollar plus tag on right now for lack of a better number. They're clearly sizable markets and I believe, Troy, transformational to our company. It's a logical extension of our healthcare business today with our FDA knowledge and our process discipline, but it's an entirely new market that I really wanna make sure we're very well-positioned. We have a lead today. We're adding really great technical resources, and we wanna continue really pushing the technology in that area. Thanks, Jeff. You've become quite the healthcare expert in a short period of time here. Quick follow-up for Jagtar. Just gross margins, I wanna hit a little bit. If we get to the midpoint of the range that you called out for 2021 here, it would imply 40%-40.5% for Q4. If we just think about going forward, I mean, is this the base level here? Do we grow it from here? I know you probably don't want to give a lot of guidance on 2022 yet, but you know, just while we're working on the models now, thoughts on that. Yeah. Troy, I mean, you know, we put out the guidance and, what I'd say is our plan is to absolutely grow from there, right? We are, as you heard in my prepared remarks, we're investing in the type of businesses that are gonna drive gross margin, right? The recurring revenue streams that we've talked about, software, materials, and the like, we think will drive gross margin in the future. At the same time, you know, we continue to enforce good cost discipline and cost management on our existing products to manage cost. I think we're going through, as you heard me talk about, some, you know, near-term headwinds with supply chain constraints and the impact that has to pricing and are managing appropriately. I think, you know, over the medium term, you'll start to see gross margins tick back up. All right. Perfect. Good, good luck, guys. Keep up the good work. Hey, Troy, just a quick thanks for picking up coverage on the company too. I know you guys are stretched thin, all of you guys, and you're a well-respected guy in the industry. Really appreciate you following the company and picking up coverage. Looking forward to working with you guys. Thanks. Thank you. Next question today is coming from Greg Palm from Craig-Hallum Capital Group. Your line is now live. Thanks, good morning, and appreciate some of the commentary around everything that sort of occurred over the last year. It's been a pretty amazing turnaround or transformation of the company. Kudos to you and the team there. Thanks, Greg. Thanks, Greg. Maybe let's start with supply chain. You called out that being a headwind, not surprisingly. Can you quantify what the revenue impact was? It appears maybe if you just look ahead, I mean, do you think that this could be, you know, a tailwind or a driver for additive manufacturing, at least for companies that are looking to, I don't know, maybe add in localized on-demand production or at least secondary sources of supply? Sure, Greg. I'll start with the quantification and let Jeff talk through the impact to our customers. On the quantification side, you know, in Q3, we probably had about, you know, $3 million of revenue, kind of $3-$4 million of revenue left on the table that we would have captured had the supply chain issues not occurred. You know, if you exclude divestitures, revenue was up for us Q3 versus Q2. Normally, you know, Q3 is lighter than Q2. If I think about revenue being up and the fact that we left revenue on the table because of supply chain, is actually a pretty strong indicator of customer demand. Well, I do think, you know, we'll see a little bit of impact in Q4, but like I said in my prepared remarks, we continue to do a yeoman's job of dealing with the issues out there. Yeah, Greg. It's, you know, having lived through a couple of cycles before in the electronics industry, particularly. These are always painful cycles when there's a real uptick in demand and as people try to expand capacity. They are always resolved, you know, it generally more quickly than you imagine they will be. They feel bad when you're going through them. I mean, it's hard. We have, you know, really exceptional demand out there right now for our products, but particularly for our application knowledge for the reason that you pointed out. It's in the silver lining in these supply chain shortages is virtually all of our key customers are saying they've got to change the nature of their supply chain. They can't live any longer on the... Especially when you look at the pandemic effects and on top of it now the supply chain shortages, they have to have a more flexible, nimble, yet cost-effective supply chain. You know, man, perhaps a little bit closer to home so you don't have all the logistics costs compounding all the other frustrations. While it's painful for us to live through and in meeting customer demand right now, I believe it's a really good tailwind for us and for our entire industry, because additive is a solution for a lot of their ills in terms of being a real production process now that'll allow them to streamline their supply chain and bring it closer to home very cost-effectively. What we did with the Oqton acquisition is we wanted to remove a big barrier to that happening because, you know, as customers really tried to set up production capability for printers, they were really stumbling over how do you do it. They can't afford to hire PhD-level engineers to run production lines and do it on a spreadsheet. So they needed a software tool that would allow them to bring printers and all the supporting equipment into the factory, set it up with a plug-and-play approach, and nowadays, apply machine intelligence and artificial intelligence to the workflow. That's what Oqton does. You know, we're working hard to remove any barriers because I believe as an industry, we've got an excellent tailwind coming as big companies revisit their supply chain. Yeah. Makes sense. You know, where would you envision that demand coming from? I don't know whether that's, you know, end market or by technology, just, you know, outside of dental, I guess, where are you seeing the most demand, and where could some future demand come from? Yeah. It's really interesting, and it's quite different by market, Greg. That's why, frankly, to come back to that theme, we've reorganized the company around markets now because that dynamic is different in each market segment. For healthcare in general, the growth, even in dental, whether it's dental or it's other med devices, the growth is being driven by this drive to personalize the solution for people. If you've got a, you know, a broken bone or you need a tissue implant or a specialized surgical procedure, they want it. It has to be cost-effective, but they want a personalized approach to medicine to drive better outcomes. That's a big need. It's reduced infection rates. It's higher throughput in surgical suites. That's really the driver in healthcare. On the industrial side of the business, it's much more what you just said. It's an idea of looking at their extended supply chain and really reworking that. When you think about it, on the industrial side, it's the big consumers, the big OEM assemblers of products. It's automotive, it's aerospace, it's all of the related technologies, you know, or companies to that, buses, trucks, cars, airplanes, all of those guys that are designing and building those, they want their supply chain to be closer to home and more nimble and yet cost-effective. On the industrial side, it's exactly what you would imagine. Because each one of those has trends of its own, like automotive today, moving heavily to EV technology, again, very good tailwind for additive manufacturing. I love being in the business we are today, and I love the structure we've adopted today with healthcare and industrial vertical focus because each industry moves at its own pace with its own unique needs. Anyway, that's my view on what's driving the spaces, Greg. Yeah. That's great. If I could just sort of sneak in one follow-up. Your disclosure of your largest customer being 20% of revenue this year, that's a pretty big step up relative to prior years. How sustainable is that level going forward? Well, you know, it's a result primarily, Greg, of us divesting other businesses. You know, we've divested businesses that they were not involved with. I love the dental space. I love the customers we have. The large customer we have is tremendous. Their penetration rate in the market is still relatively low. I think they've got a great future based on our technology. I think we've got a nice runway with them and have never had a better relationship. You know, in spite of the logistics issues and things, we've been able to take care of them and support their growth and their market as the economy's reopened and folks are really interested in their products. I'm thrilled for them. I'm thrilled for us. It's a great customer. At the same time, Greg, we've got we exhibited, and correct me if I'm wrong, Jagtar, our 15% growth in the med device space. Med devices, yep. 15%- Excluding divestitures. Yeah. 15 for divestitures. If you take out divestitures and stuff we got out of, we had 15% growth in the med device space outside of dental, you know, if you exclude dental, 15% growth, which we're thrilled by. I mean, that's an exceptional number, and I see that continuing and getting bigger. I think the whole business will get bigger for healthcare. I love the fact that we have a very successful customer that continues to grow based largely on our technology, and I think we've got a great horizon with them and with many others in the dental industry and in the med device industry. Awesome. All right. Appreciate the color. Best of luck going forward. Thanks so much, Greg. Thank you. Next question is coming from Noelle Dilts from Stifel. Your line is now live. Hi, guys. Again, congrats on all of the progress you've made over the past year. Thanks, Noelle. Sure thing. Just one question from me. Given that, you know, you're now moving into this invest phase, in a bigger way, I was hoping that you could kind of comment on, you know, what the pipeline looks like in terms of companies that you're talking to, what your conversations are like. Then maybe if you could just revisit, you know, if you had to kind of rank priorities in terms of where your interest lies, if you could talk about medical versus industrial and then software versus applications, just kind of giving us a sense of how you're thinking about this next phase moving forward. Thanks. Very happy to, Noelle. And again, if I miss one of those, feel free to ask me again. In terms of priorities, look, it's pretty simple. We, you know, underneath our market focus lies our three core technologies, you know, printers, materials, and software. We wanna make sure that those remain highly differentiated. That gets down to sometimes component level investment and of disruptive technology, so new ways to print parts. The big priority in that area, Noelle, is materials. We have a great photopolymers group internally. We continue to look at photopolymer experts outside, but whether it's an individual person, small groups, or even larger groups that are involved in materials development that could advance additive manufacturing. Those are always high on our priority list. We're always looking for them because value-added material brings incredible value to our customers, and it's really good for us in recurring revenue. We really love that. Software obviously is a priority. We've developed some platforms nicely internally, and we're making those available now to others. We've invested in the Oqton platform to help our customers. Software will remain a priority. I'm not sure how many other resources and software are really out there, but it would always be high on the list if something became available. I'd say material, if we get down to the underlying technologies, materials are high priority, and disruptive printer technology is always important. When you look at market priorities or application priorities, healthcare certainly is a wonderful business. We have a tremendous foundation. We've expanded it now into biotech. We're really interested in growing that area. In our traditional healthcare med device business, what's really expanding now are the number of applications. I think we have one chart that showed the human skeleton. Our path, Noelle, has pretty much been from the neck up. You know, we've been heavily focused on the head, you know, the skeletal structure of the head and doing good work around that with surgeons. What we're now doing is try to attack other parts of the skeletal system in parallel and go after that. You're looking at application expertise, other things that will advance the state-of-the-art in healthcare applications around the skeletal system, in addition to biotech. I love those. In industrial, we're being a little bit pickier in terms of what areas that we really believe will be differentiated in the future. It gets back to this theme of differentiated technology. Aerospace and space technology in general, rocketry, satellites, propulsion, they've always really valued technology for performance reasons and weight, obviously, in many cases. I think additive has a lot to offer there, and so will always remain a priority for us. Ground vehicles, cars primarily, are a mixed bag in the past because, you know, you had, you know, cars that heavily price-driven, you know, kind of high volume business, which would have traditionally been tough for additive, tougher for additive. Now with EVs, it's really interesting because they're borrowing a lot of technology from aircraft materials and applications. What makes you successful in aerospace can help you in electric vehicles as well, and they benefit from some of the more exotic part designs that you can do with additive to basically create a lightweight, strong vehicle structure for battery power to go further. EVs are a really interesting area in automotive and under the hood, hot applications. We have some new specialty materials coming out now that are really good for hot applications under the hood and other demanding automotive applications. I've probably blanketed every area there, but hopefully, that gives you a sense of what our priorities would be. We've developed a nice war chest now to go after it, and we're generating good cash flow to support that further. Great. Thanks so much. Thank you. Thank you. Next question is coming from Sarkis Sherbetchian from B. Riley Securities. Your line is now live. Hi, good morning, and thank you for taking my question here. Sure. In the last twelve-month period, you know, excluding divestitures, your sales were just over $520 million. Just wanted to get a sense for what's your, you know, outlook on organic growth for the top line, going forward on that base. Yeah, in terms of organic growth, I, you know, it's everybody struggles to put a number on the industry. I would put it this way. Our organic growth rate should be equal to or better than the industry norms. You know, people put that in, you know, nicely centered in double-digit ranges. There's no reason in the world that we wouldn't, you know, meet or beat industry growth rates. And in some of these emerging areas that we're gonna try to really, you know, continue to double down on, I think you'll see even higher growth rates. I feel really good about, you know, meeting or beating, and over time, gaining some share in the market. in our approach, you know, it's not a big share gain approach by pricing, it's more of a technology differentiation. I think you'd put, you know, an industry growth number, which are exciting numbers, good solid double-digit numbers, and a little bit of windage above that for us. That's how I look at our business. Jagtar Narula or Noel, do you have anything? That's helpful. That's fair? Okay. Rate operating expense for SG&A and R&D. I guess when considering the addition of Oqton and then Volumetric, once it closes, are these dilutive to profitability in essence? What's kind of the OpEx run rate as we think about integrating those businesses into SG&A? Hey, sorry, this is Jagtar Narula. I talked a little bit about that in the calls where we announced those acquisitions. I'll reiterate my commentary there. On Oqton, what I've said is, you know, in the near term, meaning the rest of this year, you know, we close on November first, you know, don't expect much revenue contribution from them this year, although I expect that to ramp next year. Right now, their OpEx run rate's running about $3 million a quarter. It will be dilutive in the near term, but, you know, with their rapid growth, we would expect over the next year or two to be less dilutive. On the Volumetric side, in the near term, I'm not expecting any kind of net OpEx impact until we sort of make decisions to invest further in the call it the non-organ side of the business. On their core business, you know, we announced the expansion of our contract with United Therapeutics that will help support the expenses associated with Volumetric. As we make decisions to further advance the non-organ side, we may have additional investments, but we'll talk about that in the future. Great. Thank you. That's all for me. Thanks, Sir. Thank you. Next question today is coming from Wamsi Mohan from Bank of America. Your line is now live. Yes, thank you. Jeff, I'm trying to sort of reconcile some of your commentary regarding, you know, the very change that companies are implementing in terms of supply chains and how they're thinking about maybe manufacturing at different places and doing the entire manufacturing process differently versus comparing, like, your industrial revenues from two years ago to now, right? Like, you alluded- Right. to the growth in aggregate, but the industrial side itself has not shown that much growth. Whereas in some of the other industries, where digital transformation has become a priority, you have seen, for instance, in software, like material improvement and revenue growth as these companies are implementing digital transformation. So I'm just wondering, are you seeing any tea leaves with respect to industrial? How should we think about industrial as it progresses into 2022? Should we be seeing a much more material inflection in growth rate? If you could make any comments there, that'd be helpful. I have a follow-up. Yeah. It's more of a broad comment, Wamsi. I would say you know, industrial is a very big market broadly, and it'll vary by vertical. I think that's why you've seen each company, because each company has a little bit different exposure in their customer base on the industrial side. Some are growing faster than others. I think on average, if you look at the next few years, industrial broadly is gonna grow very nicely because I think COVID was immensely disruptive for them in terms of having you know, for example, their Asian supply chain shut down, you know, and then and now on top of it, you've got shortages and logistics issues. I do think broadly industrial will be a strong grower in the next few years for everyone. The individual rate by quarter will probably vary depending on what market you're really focused on. I wouldn't you know, worry too much about, you know, quarter-by-quarter changes. If you look at year-over-year changes going forward, I think there'll be a lift for most people participating in the space. Obviously, we tend to target the ones that are most technology-driven. Some of those will be faster growing than others, you know, coming out. I think, you know, they all should be pretty impressive growth rates is my guess, if that's helpful to you. Yeah. No, that's helpful. Then just to follow up, as we think about gross margins, right, I understand that there are some supply chain headwinds, currently, as you're looking into the fourth quarter. As you look out, I know last call you guys sort of spoke about your long-term targets, of 50% gross margin. You mentioned on this call that that was largely a function of sort of, you know, increasing levels of software and increasing level of materials. You also made the comment that your go-to-market is much more sort of solution-based than product-based per se, right? Like not piecemeal thinking about printers, materials, and software. As I put those two things together, are you essentially saying that you're making a big change to your sales motion to support a solution-based selling? Secondarily, as you think about that gross margin hitting that inflection, what's the timeframe that we're talking about? I know your long-term target is 50%, but if we're tracking closer to 40% today and we're still having supply chain issues. Yeah. The mix is probably not gonna swing that quickly. Just help us with the trajectory as you think through what those large contributors when they kick in. Yep. The big drivers, and maybe I'll let Jagtar Narula supplement this with comments on the short term, but I can tell you the big drivers for us in terms of hitting our gross margin target, which again is 50% or better. From a macro standpoint, clearly healthcare will be a big driver. That healthcare commands higher gross margins. Clearly, you know, growing in healthcare is a good thing broadly. We'll continue to drive that hard. With the extension now into biotech, I think that's really exciting from a gross margin implication standpoint, not only top line, but gross margin standpoint. That's really good. From a mix standpoint, we invest a lot of money in value-added materials. If you look at ongoing consumables, once you have an installed base of printers, materials are great. Then software, both the software platform upfront and ongoing upgrade software, we're moving more to subscription models now. That's a great recurring revenue stream. If you look at the mix of what we actually sell, what we, you know, in the transactions. You should see a richer mix going forward. From a macro standpoint, you should see faster growth rates in healthcare overall, which carry a higher gross margin. Those are kind of the macro trends that we'll drive, and we will continue to focus on technology that's differentiated. Day by day pricing, you know, if you wrap it into a solution and it's differentiated technology, hopefully you can command the highest gross margin up front as well. Those are kind of the individual levers and the macro trends that'll drive gross margin up to that 50% target. In terms of short term, Jagtar, I'll let you put on your crystal ball. Yeah, sure. It's hard to say. Let me talk about timing, Wamsi. The way we've modeled it out, we approached 50% gross margins over our strategic planning period, right? Which is sort of 4-5 years that we've modeled it out. The way I look at it is, in the near term, we've got the supply chain issues. From what our supply chain people tell us, they're kind of projecting kind of these issues in the market for the first half of next year, and then it starts to soften down. You know, we're looking at improvements in gross margin sort of continuously over that 4-5-year planning period, kind of excluding the near term supply chain issues. Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you. Next question is coming from Brian Drab from William Blair. Line is now live. Good morning, Brian. Hi. Thanks Hi. Thanks for taking the questions. Hey, good morning. Did you say how much revenue was from dental versus non-dental within the healthcare business this quarter? We haven't broken that out. What we've said is that our non-dental business grew 15% organically after adjusting for divestitures. Okay, great. That 15%. When you say med device, that's non-dental? Yeah. The non-dental. That's non-dental. Okay. Correct. Right. Okay, got it. Just some other, like, cleaning up, like, modeling stuff. You gave divested revenue, but can you help us with, you know, how much of the divested revenue is in products versus services? I do not have that breakout. For the third quarter. Yeah, I don't have that breakout with me, Brian, but I can get you that offline. Okay. Jagtar, thanks for the comments around, you know, the Oqton $3 million in OpEx. I'm just wondering, can you make a larger, like, higher level comment around OpEx and what you know, given the OpEx run rate that exited the quarter at Yeah. You know, what should we expect for the fourth quarter and going forward? Yeah, sure. model for that. Our non-GAAP OpEx in the third quarter is $54.1 million. You'll have the impact of the divestitures, right? So right now, you know, the assets that we divested in Q3 contributed about, you know, $4 million-$5 million in OpEx. So that'll come out in Q4. R&D was light in Q3, the result of, you know, some R&D credits we received in certain countries, as well as, some attrition that we had and some hiring of backfills that we're doing. So I would expect R&D to be kind of marginally up in Q4, not by much, though. If you weigh those trade-offs, then, you know, you'd sort of stay flat to slightly up on OpEx after adjusting for divestitures, then you add in the Volumetric, which we'll have about two months worth of. Okay. Oqton is Oh, sorry. I meant Oqton. I said Volumetric. I meant Oqton. Sorry. Right. Volumetric doesn't come with any OpEx, you said. Yeah. Right. Okay. Right. Right. Okay. Then going forward, like in 2022, you know, you mentioned you're gonna be investing obviously in the higher growth businesses. But does this? You know, are these big investments or is this OpEx kinda growing in line with revenue? Yeah. I think OpEx will grow in line with revenue. Got it. Okay. Thanks very much. Yep. Thanks, Brian. Thank you. Next question today is coming from Paul Chung from J.P. Morgan. Your line is now live. Hi. Thanks for taking my question. You know, you typically see some seasonal strength in 4Q. Should we expect to see, you know, kind of a bump here from the $137 million range in Q3 for kind of core business ex divestitures? And then on the, you know, kind of the recent acquisitions, how do we think about the timing of layering in the contribution there? Will it be kind of more material in, I don't know, second half of 2022? Yeah. I'll answer both of those, Paul. On the timing of the acquisitions we would expect second half of 2022 is kind of where we'd expect to see the ramp starting up. With you know with Oqton it's a cloud software business so you know we're working hard on bookings. We see a fantastic pipeline right now actually but that'll be more the second half as you start to see that revenue build. On the Q4 revenue forecast I would say I would look to our normal seasonality Q3 to Q4. Right now we're seeing you know I would exclude last year. Last year was kind of a sizable jump from Q3 to Q4 because of the COVID dynamics. If you look at prior years, the normal Q3 to Q4 bump, we're seeing sort of typical seasonality. You know, obviously, supply chain is the big swing in this year. Right now, as I said, we're doing all we can to sort of manage supply chain, and we're kind of seeing our normal Q3 to Q4. Gotcha. On free cash flow, you know, you guys have done a great job there, but, you know, what would the kind of normalized free cash flow have been kind of ex divestiture and, you know, how do we think about that, you know, quarterly run rate of free cash flow? Yeah as we layer in acquisitions as well? You've done a great job on working capital as well. Yeah. If I go back to what I said in the last phone call, the divestitures, the stuff that we did this year, contributed about $25 million a quarter to revenue and about $5 million a quarter to contribution margin. There's kind of very little depreciation associated with those assets. That's, you know, roughly a cash flow number, maybe slightly higher. Let's call it $5 million-$6 million a quarter. Got it. Lastly, just a quick modeling. Can you confirm kind of the cash outflow in Q4 and, you know, equity issuance for Q4? What's the share count expectations kind of post-acquisitions in Q4 and moving forward? Sure. Yeah. We released- What's been the rationale between the cash equity split? You got a- So- Big pitch in there. Yeah. Yeah. You know, we released a 10-Q today that's got an updated share count number on the first page. It's got included within that the shares we issued for the Volumetric acquisition, which was roughly about 2.5 million shares. Sorry, I got it wrong. The Oqton acquisition, I keep saying that wrong. The Oqton acquisition, about 2.5 million shares. For Volumetric, it'll be you know, half of the purchase price, so $22.5 million worth of shares. That'll be based upon you know, the trailing 20-day average. Figure you know, roughly $30 a share there once that acquisition closes. That'll be the primary issuance of stock in Q4. The split that we've done, cash and stock, you know, primarily it's been to manage, you know, to manage cash. We, you know, we have a sizable balance sheet now, but we, you know, we do wanna make investments and we wanna reserve cash for making investments. With some of the acquired assets, we want some of the founders' skin in the game, so we've balanced it between cash and stock. Makes sense. Okay, great. Thanks. Thanks. Thank you. Our last question today is coming from Ashley Ellis from Cross Research. Your line is now live. Hi. Thank you for taking my question. Sure. Over the last few months and just on this call today, it seems like you're really focusing heavily on healthcare and becoming more and more of a healthcare company. I'm wondering, how are those conversations going with your large industrial customers? How are you giving them the assurance that you're going to support them for the years to come when they're making investments of hundreds of thousands of dollars? At the same time, how are you thinking about, you know, sales headcount and investments in R&D for the industrial business as you're being more selective, but you wanna make sure you're not gonna fall behind the pack? Thanks. No, two very good questions. I would tell you while a lot of my examples today were healthcare examples, we're very excited about industrial. As I mentioned, we pick our markets carefully in industrial to make sure they're targeted toward folks that can get the most benefit from additive manufacturing. That's where we target our efforts. We're very excited about industrial. If you get down to the technology level on printing, I'll just pick one example, Ashley. If you say powder bed fusion with lasers. You have metal and polymer powder bed fusion that can go both directions to industrial and to healthcare applications quite nicely. There's a lot of synergy and overlap with those. By investing in the underlying technologies, we get a double bang for the buck, basically. We can take them. What distinguishes the two businesses are the application expertise. Helping a rocket company, you know, build a big titanium component versus a very small titanium component that's gonna be implanted in the human body in the healthcare business, the basic technology can be very similar. The application expertise is quite different. That's why I talked a little bit about the necessity of reorganizing the company into Healthcare and Industrial business units, because that application knowledge is very specific to that customer base. They don't wanna come in, you know. Somebody involved in orthopedic implants doesn't wanna come in and talk about rocket components, right? They want to know how you can help a surgeon repair a bone with a titanium implant. On and on and on. That application knowledge is where it starts fragmenting between market verticals, and that's a part of the sales process. We are building out, you know, a bit more of a direct sales force in certain market verticals, especially in healthcare, where it's very specialized customers that require distinct application knowledge. We still have a very robust geographically dispersed sales team around the world that cover either small emerging customers or cover industrial customers more broadly. We plan on maintaining both of those approaches. It's a balance. You gotta watch the cost, but it's certainly worth getting right, and it's one of the things we reconfigured heavily over the last, I'd say 18 months. Okay, thank you. My one last question, this might be splitting hairs a bit, but I know a couple of times during the call you mentioned that you completed your divestitures. At the very beginning of the call, Jeff, you mentioned that you had completed the first of your divestitures of non-core assets. Is that to imply you could make more divestitures, or am I just reading too closely to the language? No, Ashley, I'm sorry if it didn't come across clearly. A year ago, what I was reflecting on is as we sat here a year ago, we had done one, and now a year later, we've done them all. We are finished. We own what we're very happy owning and feel like we're the rightful owners of, and we've divested things that are best owned by other folks. We're finished with divestitures. You know, I guess you can never say blanket finished, but we are really basically finished. We're focused on additive as a standalone core business, and that's the way we wanna run the business going forward. Okay, thank you so much. You're welcome. Given that that was the last question, I will just make the comment. As our general practice going forward, we'll do what we've done with the last two acquisitions. When they're really important to us strategically, and not all acquisitions are important strategically, but when they really are, you know, kind of groundbreaking, needle-moving, potential as an acquisition, we'll try to hold a separate investor call the next day and just describe why we're excited about it and what role it plays in addition to the economics of the deal. That'll give you a little bit more strategic view. If you go back to both the Oqton and the Volumetric acquisition, both of those investor calls are on the website under the Investor Relations tab, and you're welcome to look at the charts and listen to them at your leisure if you wanna know more about them in detail. These quarterly calls are shorter by nature and probably a little less strategically deep. Thank you. Kevin, I think that wraps up the Q&A. Perfect. Do you have any further closing comments, sir? John, do you wanna wrap up? Thank you for joining us today and for your continued support of 3D Systems. A replay of this webcast will be available after the call on the Investor Relations section of our website. Have a good day. Thank you. Thanks, everyone. Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.