Welcome to HF Sinclair Corporation's first quarter 2025 conference call and webcast. Hosting the call today is Tim Go, Chief Executive Officer of HF Sinclair. He is joined by Atanas Atanasov, Chief Financial Officer; Steve Ledbetter, EVP of Commercial; Valerie Pompa, EVP of Operations; and Matt Joyce, SVP of Lubricants and Specialties. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode, and the floor will be open for your questions following the presentation. If you would like to ask a question at this time, please press star one on your touch-tone phone. If at any point your question has been answered, you may remove yourself from the queue by pressing the pound key. If you should require operator assistance, please press star zero. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Additionally, we ask that you pick up your handset to allow optimal sound quality. Please note that this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Craig Biery, Vice President, Investor Relations. Craig, you may begin. Thank you, Kate. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to HF Sinclair Corporation's first quarter 2025 earnings call. This morning, we issued a press release announcing results for the quarter ending March 31, 2025. If you would like a copy of the earnings press release, you may find it on our website at hfsinclair.com. Before we proceed with remarks, please note the safe harbor disclosure statement in today's press release. In summary, it says statements made regarding management expectations, judgments, or predictions are forward-looking statements. These statements are intended to be covered under the safe harbor provisions of federal security laws. There are many factors that could cause results to differ from expectations, including those noted in our SEC filings. The call also may include discussion of non-GAAP measures. Please see the earnings press release for reconciliations to GAAP financial measures. Also, please note any time-sensitive information provided on today's call may no longer be accurate at the time of any webcast replay or rereading of the transcript. With that, I'll turn the call over to Tim. Good morning, everyone. For the first quarter, we delivered strong results in our marketing, midstream, and lubricants and specialties businesses, and saw encouraging sequential improvement in refining. I am proud of our employees and their ability to navigate the extreme volatility and uncertainty around tariffs, producers' tax credits, and other market headwinds. We remain focused on the things in our control, such as commercial and operational excellence, turnaround execution, and capital discipline. Now let me cover our segment highlights. In refining for the first quarter, we delivered sequential quarter improvements in capture and operating expenses, despite a tough economic environment across the period. We began the planned turnaround work at our Tulsa refinery, which was completed on schedule and on budget, and is now operating at planned rates. In renewables for the first quarter, we focused on lowering total operating expenses and optimizing low CI feedstocks to help mitigate the economic impact surrounding the uncertainty of the producers' tax credit. At this time, we have not taken any credit for PTC in our financials. We estimate that we would have been close to break-even EBITDA for the quarter with the inclusion of PTC. Our marketing segment delivered a record quarter of $27 million in EBITDA and achieved our highest quarterly adjusted gross margin of $0.12 per gallon. We also grew our branded supplied stores by a net of 37 sites and have a backlog of over 170 additional supplied branded sites signed and targeted to bring online by year-end. In lubricants and specialties, we reported another strong quarter of $85 million in EBITDA, supported by our product mix optimization efforts focused on sales of high-margin specialty and finished products. We are in the process of completing the planned turnaround work at our Mississauga facility and expect to be back to planned operations within the week. In our midstream business, we delivered a record quarter, generating $119 million in adjusted EBITDA, as we benefited from higher pipeline revenues in the period. Today, we announced our board of directors declared a regular quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share, payable on June 3rd, 2025, to holders of record on May 15th, 2025. Looking forward, we are encouraged by the recent strength of refining margins as we head into the summer driving season and are focused on the execution of our strategic priorities to capture value across all of our business segments. With that, let me turn the call over to Atanas. Thank you, Tim, and good morning, everyone. Let's begin by reviewing HF Sinclair's financial highlights. Today, we reported first quarter net loss attributable to HF Sinclair shareholders of $4 million, or negative $0.02 per diluted share. These results reflect special items that collectively decreased net loss by $46 million. Excluding these items, adjusted net loss for the first quarter was $50 million, or negative $0.27 per diluted share, compared to adjusted net income of $142 million, or $0.71 per diluted share for the same period in 2024. Adjusted EBITDA for the first quarter was $201 million, compared to $399 million in the first quarter of 2024. In our refining segment, first quarter adjusted EBITDA was negative $8 million, compared to $209 million in the first quarter of 2024. This decrease was principally driven by lower adjusted refinery gross margins in both the West and Mid-Con regions and lower refined product sales volumes. Crude oil charge averaged 606,000 barrels per day for the first quarter, compared to 605,000 barrels per day for the first quarter of 2024. In our renewables segment, we reported adjusted EBITDA of negative $17 million for the first quarter, compared to negative $18 million for the first quarter of 2024. Our first quarter 2025 results were impacted by lower sales volumes and the absence of benefits from the producers' tax credit. Total sales volumes were 44 million gallons for the first quarter of 2025, compared to 61 million gallons for the first quarter of 2024. Our marketing segment reported EBITDA of $27 million for the first quarter, compared to $15 million for the first quarter of 2024. This increase was primarily driven by improved execution of our business and high-grading the portfolio in the first quarter of 2025. Our lubricants and specialties segment reported EBITDA of $85 million for the first quarter, compared to EBITDA of $87 million for the first quarter of 2024. Our midstream segment reported adjusted EBITDA of $119 million in the first quarter, compared to $110 million in the first quarter of last year. This increase was primarily driven by higher pipeline revenues in the first quarter of 2025. Net cash used for operations totaled $89 million in the first quarter, which included $105 million of turnaround spend. HF Sinclair's capital expenditure totaled $86 million for the first quarter of 2025. As of March 31, 2025, HF Sinclair's cash balance was $547 million. As of March 31, we have $2.7 billion of debt outstanding with a debt-to-cap ratio of 23% and net debt-to-cap ratio of 18%. During the quarter, we executed a successful refinancing transaction. HF Sinclair issued an aggregate principal amount of $1.4 billion of senior notes, consisting of $650 million of 5.75% senior notes due 2031 and $750 million of 6.25% senior notes due 2035. We used net proceeds from the notes to repay all $350 million in outstanding borrowings under the HEP Credit Facility and to fund approximately $850 million in tenders and redemptions of our 2026 senior notes and $150 million in tenders of our 2027 senior notes. This extended our debt maturity profile while lowering our weighted average interest expense. On April 3, 2025, we entered into a new $2 billion HF Sinclair Credit Facility and terminated the existing HF Sinclair and HEP Credit Facilities. As of April 30th, 2025, our new five-year credit facility was undrawn. Let's go through some guidance items. With respect to capital spending for full year 2025, we still expect to spend approximately $775 million in sustaining capital, including turnaround and catalysts. This is down $25 million from 2024 and includes a non-refining lubricants and specialties turnaround in the first quarter of 2025, in the first half of 2025. In addition, we expect to spend $100 million in growth capital investments across our business segments. For the second quarter of 2025, we expect to run between 600,000 and 630,000 barrels per day of crude oil in our refining segment, which reflects the ongoing planned turnaround at our Tulsa refinery and the planned turnaround at our Parco refinery during the period. We're now ready to take some questions from the audience, and I'll turn it over to the operator. The floor is now open for questions. At this time, if you have questions or comments, please press star one on your touch-tone phone. We ask that you please limit to one question and one follow-up. If you had additional questions, we welcome you to rejoin the queue. If at any point your question has been answered, you may remove yourself from the queue by pressing the pound key. Thank you. Our first question is coming from Manav Gupta with UBS. Please go ahead. Good morning, guys. Very strong results considering the macro. I actually just wanted to start on the midstream side. I think you moved some assets from the midstream HEP into refining, and yet what we are seeing is probably one of the strongest midstream quarters that you have delivered, close to almost $120 million in EBITDA. Help us understand what's driving the growth in the midstream business and your outlook for continuing to grow this business as we move ahead. Hey, Manav, this is Steve. We're very excited about the midstream business, and we think that it's really not fully optimized yet. What drove the performance in Q1 was predominantly increased focus on our products and crude pipelines and the revenue generation from our tariff situation there. We believe that this is both an opportunity to grow the integrated value as well as a third-party situation. It is a focus area and helps us, what we like to say, unlock the integrated value chain between refining, midstream, and marketing moving forward. Yeah. Manav, this is Tim. I would just chime in and say, you know, we've said all along that we believed that bringing in the HEP business completely into our portfolio was the right thing to do. It was going to break down some internal hurdles and allow us to optimize the business. As Steve and his team are doing, they're finding those opportunities, and that's showing up in the bottom line. Perfect. My quick follow-up is Lubes also very resilient. Help us understand the volatility in this business. Looks like its earnings are a lot more stable than the refining. In the near term, given what we're seeing in the macro, your confidence level of earnings in your Lubes business, and again, I think you had identified and said, you know, we're looking to grow this business also. If you could help us understand that also. Sure, Manav. Hey, it's Matt Joyce here. You know, Manav, we've talked about it on the past several earnings calls. We continue to execute our strategy really well. We're doubling down on our growth in the U.S. We have selected end uses that we believe have higher growth rates, businesses that tend to depend on us, and where we have great solutions that can win. You know, we're outperforming the markets in mining, food-grade lubricants, thermal management, pharmaceutical, and personal care, just to kind of give you a sense of those high-value markets. Those have the ability to weather a lot of these storms and to be continuous and consistent performing markets, and we'll go through those to be a steady performance on the Lube side. We also enjoyed a really good mix of products this past quarter. We had a little bit lower base oil sales, so you saw that forward integration strategy that we've talked about, getting more of our base oils placed and finished in specialty applications. You're seeing that pay dividends here in these results. Yeah. As far as, Manav, your second question around bolt-on opportunities, I mean, what we're looking for, obviously, what Matt has talked about is our primary focus on organic growth. Clearly, there are some opportunities that are out there that would allow us to continue or accelerate that growth strategy. Nothing large, but small that would fit nicely within our portfolio, and we're continuing to look at those. There's obviously nothing to talk about today. Thank you, sir. Your next question comes from the line of Ryan Todd with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Thanks. Maybe on the refining side, can you talk about what you're seeing in terms of demand across your markets? Product sales were down across your network, I think, year on year. I'm just curious, is that a reflection of demand or something else? Maybe more broadly, what are you seeing across your markets? Yeah, Ryan, this is Steve. Just across our markets, we're seeing demand relatively flat, we like to say, for gas, and distillate, what we saw in the first quarter was positive. The impact on our sales was mainly driven by turnaround aspects. The distillate demand being up, we think, is generated predominantly by a colder winter in PADD 1, as well as reduced RD and BD product associated with the new 45Z regulation. That drove about 100,000 barrels a day off the market, which was supplemented by petroleum demand. We are pretty excited about the demand patterns and what we're seeing and how it's showing up in the cracks moving into the driving season, and particularly across our regions. That's great. Thank you. Maybe on the renewable diesel side, can you walk through, I know first quarter was a very noisy quarter with kind of the shift in regulatory regime. Can you walk through the impacts of how that impacted your business? How are you managing feedstock optimization, whether you were able to book any credits during the first quarter, and if you think you'll be able to book any during the second quarter, or maybe any possible tailwinds as we look forward here? Yeah. We did not recognize any tax credit for PTC in the first quarter, just given the uncertainty of the regulation. As you know, there were changing regulations throughout the quarter, and that caused us to run very carefully and run at reduced rates. Had we been able to recognize any of the tax credit under the current proposed regulations, we would have been close to break even for EBITDA from our operations within the quarter. You know, we think at very least something's going to have to give here in terms of RVO and RIN credits to go dislocate more than the traditional BOHO spread. You're starting to see some of that support. Clarity is really going to help, but I was very proud of the team to be able to navigate the uncertainty and get to an EBITDA break even if we had recognized PTC. Longer term, we think some of this regulation is actually good for an overall tighter supply and demand balance, and we position ourselves to go capture that tailwind through the efforts that we've made over the past nine to twelve months. Yeah. Ryan, this is Tim. What I would just say is, you know, all along we've said that our goal is to have our renewable diesel business be break even to slightly positive in these bottom-of-market conditions. With the PTC coming on at a reduced credit rate than the BTC was previously, I think the team has stepped up very nicely to continue to improve the foundation of the business to where they are, as we mentioned on the prepared remarks, still running at a basically break-even pace, even with the lower PTC credits that we'll hopefully eventually be able to book in the future. Great. Thanks, guys. Your next question comes from the line of Doug Leggate with Wolfe Research. Please go ahead. Yeah. Good morning, team. This is actually Carlos on for Doug. I think that it's, and we as a team think that it's valid to recognize, first of all, that it was a very solid operational quarter in an extremely tough tape. That being said, we'd like to take the prior question a step further and ask you guys, at what point do you consider mothballing R&D facilities versus running the risk of negative cash, and also acknowledging that the outlook for RINs is unclear? Yeah. It's a good question. We ask ourselves that all the time and have our conversations in the boardroom as well on those kind of questions. We believe we have competitive advantage over the majority of the industry, and you see some of that happening even during this first quarter. A lot of biodiesel plants have shut down. Even some renewable diesel plants have shut down, just as you mentioned. As long as we, the reason we keep talking about we can be break even, the slightly positive in these bottom-of-cycle conditions, is we believe that as long as we can do that, and we'll manage the cash as a result of that. As long as we can do that on a day-in and day-out basis, then we believe we can continue to improve the business and be ready for when the RIN prices and LCFS prices recover and come back to what we believe is more of a long-term level. We think right now we're at bottom-of-cycle conditions, but the conditions will improve, and our businesses will be profitable at that point. Appreciate the answer, Tim. As a follow-up, we'd like to ask about LPG and your overall midstream business, because I think we've all grown accustomed to and experienced volatility on the oil and refining market as a whole. LPG has been certainly a topic of debate lately with the ongoing talks with tariffs. Wondering if you can perhaps walk us through if there's any potential opportunity for you, given the dislocation in the market and the uncertainty around that, or if you think that there's anything noteworthy for investors to know regarding that specific segment. Yeah, this is Steve. I'll take that one. You know, we don't have a concentration in our midstream space around LPG. It's not just part of our core business. We don't know that that's an area we go invest in over integrating and more concentration of getting crude and light products molecules on our system and taking full advantage of that. Having said that, we always look at multiple opportunities, and if there was something that was very accretive to the enterprise, we would put it in our funnel and evaluate it at that time. At this point, we don't have a lot of exposure and are not using that as one of our growth platforms in the midstream space associated with LPGs. Thank you, team. Appreciate it. Your next question comes from the line of Joe Laetsch with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, Tim and team. Thanks for taking my questions. I wanted to start on refining. We've had a couple of strong weekly demand numbers for gasoline, and inventories are pretty tight, particularly on the West Coast. I know you've talked about the project that expands your ability to make CARB gasoline at Puget Sound. Is that online? Could you also just talk to your leverage to the West Coast market, given the unplanned downtime recently, as well as the announced closure of two refineries upcoming? Hey, Joe. I'll take that one, Steve. I'll answer the question in the order I think they were asked, and that was the project that we had mentioned around our ability to potentially get more involved in the CARB gas project. Those tanks will be coming online soon. Now, we will be staging them over the next couple of months to be able to make a decision whether we move unfinished products into the California market, or we swell the volume pool and move gasoline there. We are almost at the point where we'll have those ready for use in our portfolio. Given the headwinds that we see with the announced recent announcements, as well as current unplanned events, we think that is a benefit not only to getting into California, but also tightening up the market in the Pacific Northwest relative to the overall PADD 5 tightness. You know, we took advantage this quarter of moving more molecules and playing the yard between what was getting short and stronger demand and margin picture in Las Vegas. We think that that is part of the advantage of our footprint, both in the midstream and our production throughout the Rockies. You know, we like to say we can move barrels out of the Group into the Front Range and from the Rockies all the way up to the Pacific Northwest and down into southern PADD 5. We think that all bodes well for us moving forward, not only this year, but as it continues to play out over the next two years with the announced shuttering of various facilities. Yeah. Joe, this is Tim. I would just point out that the West Coast was not the only region that we saw strength in demand. I mean, the Mid-Con, the Group itself, was strong. We entered the first quarter at pretty much highs on inventories, and we exited the first quarter at pretty much lows in the Group. I think that just bodes to the strength of demand. It also talks about some of the capacity that was offline during turnarounds and is really the source of the strength and cracks that we see across the country. Great. Thanks for that. My follow-up is on the marketing segment, which had a really strong quarter, particularly for Q1, which is typically a weaker period seasonally. Could you talk to some of the drivers during the quarter, the repeatability of it, and then any change to the $75-$80 million annual EBITDA rubric that you've talked about in the past on that? Thank you. Yeah. Yeah, this is Steve. We're very excited about the marketing business and the performance that we had in the first quarter, record EBITDA, and that was largely driven by optimizing our underlying business. We're starting to see the results of high-grading our portfolio, making sure that our brand standard is applied to the new sites that we're bringing on, and to be honest, culling some of the portfolio that doesn't make sense. I would tell you, getting the full value of the brand where we haven't done that in the past. Strategically making moves and growing in the right markets is all playing out, and our underlying execution of our business is starting to yield results. As we look forward, we think that our run rate is still between $75 million and $85 million annually, and we see upward progression as we continue to go build out our network moving forward. Yeah. And Joe, I would just say, you know, we haven't changed our guidance in terms of run rates, but obviously the first quarter results are very positive. We do think they're going to be sustainable, and we'll update you guys as we continue to play that out. We don't think there was an anomaly, if that's what you're asking, or any type of special items in the first quarter for marketing. The additional stores, I mean, we're up over 100 stores year over year versus where we were in the first quarter of last year. All that is driving the growth that you're seeing. We've talked about how the branded put for our barrels is our key strategy that we were focused on coming out of the Sinclair acquisition. Now you're really starting to see the results starting to really play out on the bottom line. We still think there's a lot of opportunity to go, and we're driving towards that in terms of what you're going to see: more stores, you're going to see higher volumes, and then you're going to see higher EBITDA coming out of our marketing segment. That's great. Sounds like you all have solid investment in that segment. Thank you all for the time. I appreciate it. Your next question comes from the line of Jason Gabelman with TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. The first one I wanted to ask is just the outlook for turnarounds on the year and wondering kind of what the cadence is quarter to quarter. Q1, you had some activity. Q2, it seems like you have a bit more. Wondering if Q2 is kind of the peak turnaround quarter for the year, and then how that kind of informs your cash management strategy and potentially the ability and desire to buy back shares as they've weakened a bit here. I'll take the first part. This is Valerie. Our turnaround performance continues to be a highlight for us. First quarter is the heavier quarter with our lubricants, Tulsa, and Parco turnarounds. We have one turnaround remaining for the year that will fall in the Q3, and that's really the end of our annual or season for the year. We directionally expect our turnarounds, as we anticipate that those are going to continue to level out as we move into 2026, 2027, and beyond. Jason, I'll take your second question with respect to how this informs our cash management strategy and buybacks. Obviously, this quarter with the turnarounds was a net cash draw for us. As we progress into the balance of the year with line of sight of better cracks, we believe that any excess cash flow that we generate, we should be able to return to our shareholders. Just to remind everyone, just with our dividend, our run rate now is 6%. Our strategy is to return any of that excess cash to our shareholders. Jason, this is Tim. Let me just add one more thing. You know, during Atanas's prepared remarks, he mentioned that our turnaround guidance is still unchanged for this year, and that's because our turnaround execution continues to go as planned. Valerie mentioned that we have a Lubes turnaround this year, which is what kept our overall turnaround spend at these levels. Next year, we won't have that additional Lubes plant in our turnaround schedule. As we talked about in the past, we are starting to get past the peak in terms of our catch-up capital required for turnarounds, and we are anticipating that the turnaround workload starting next year and then in the years after that will be significantly lower than what we've seen over the last couple of years in turnarounds. Got it. That's great color. Thanks. My follow-up is just on tariffs and the trade war as it relates to the Lubes business. A bit less familiar on the dynamic, so I was hoping you could just talk about if there's any tailwinds or headwinds from some of the trade limitations and tariffs that are being put in place as it relates to your lubricants business. Thanks. Yeah. Yeah, thanks for the question. This is Matt Joyce. With regard specifically to the Lubes piece on tariffs, we've been working to tariff-proof the business. Our business is largely 95% plus USMCA compliant with the materials that we bring in and out of the country. We've been evaluating some of the production of our finished products and specialties and looking at ensuring that they're in the best supply chain locations to provide a solution to our customer bases. As far as specific bond costs from either additive companies or other suppliers, we're monitoring that cost of goods very closely and taking any required action in the marketplace as a pass-through should we require it. All right. Great. Thanks for the answers. Yeah. Jason, just to make it clear, you know, we do have a facility up in Canada, and as Matt talked about, the team has done a great job of managing through the different tariff regulations. Most of our products actually do qualify for USMCA on the Lubes side, and these guys have done a great job of mapping that so that we can avoid the tariffs. I will now turn the call back to Tim for closing remarks. Thank you, Kate. Before we close, I want to emphasize that our first quarter performance represented improved financials quarter over quarter overall, and especially for our refining, midstream marketing, and Lubes and specialty segments. Delivering these stronger results, despite all the challenging market conditions and headwinds we faced, is a proof point that our strategy is working. In addition, these results demonstrate the earnings power of our diversified portfolio. Looking ahead, our priorities remain the same. To one, improve our reliability; two, integrate and optimize our portfolio of assets; and three, return excess cash to shareholders. Thank you for joining our call, and have a great day. Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. Please disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day.