Welcome to the DoubleVerify Q2 2024 financial results conference call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. If you require operator assistance, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the call over to Tejal Engman, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin. Good afternoon and welcome to DoubleVerify's Q2 2024 earnings conference call. With us today are Mark Zagorski, CEO, and Nicola Allais, CFO. Today's press release and this call may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to inherent risks, uncertainties, and changes, and reflect our current expectations and information currently available to us, and our actual results could differ materially. For more information, please refer to the risk factors in our recent SEC filings, including our Form 10-Q and our annual report of Form 10-K. In addition, our discussion today will include references to certain supplemental non-GAAP financial measures and should be considered in addition to and nothing to substitute for our GAAP results. Reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures available in today's earnings press release, which is available on our Investor Relations website at ir.doubleverify.com. Also, during the call today, we'll be referring to the slide deck posted on our website. With that, I'll turn it over to Mark. Thanks, Tejal, and thank you all for joining us today. The Q2 was pivotal for DV as we re-accelerated our revenue growth trajectory fueled by ongoing momentum in social and CTV measurement and a sustainable upswing in our supply-side platform business driven in large part by the burgeoning retail media sector. We achieved the high end of our revenue guidance and significantly exceeded our profitability and cash flow expectations. We grew Q2 revenue by 17% year over year to $156 million, with double-digit revenue growth across all three revenue lines: activation, measurement, and supply side. By increasing revenue and reducing our cost of sales year over year through the implementation of our Universal Content Intelligence tool, a proprietary AI-powered video classification solution, and other investments in technological efficiencies, we achieved an 83% gross margin and $47 million of Adjusted EBITDA, representing a 30% Adjusted EBITDA margin. Additionally, our net cash from operating activities grew significantly, totaling $36 million for the Q2. We are at an inflection point in our ongoing evolution as the industry's leading media quality and performance solutions platform. For the first time in DV's history, we measured more video impressions than display impressions and more impressions outside North America than within. These milestones highlight the success of our Verify Everywhere strategy, enabling us to verify every digital ad impression across all channels, formats, and geographies worldwide. As video content, whether short form, long form, or CTV, becomes the primary way that consumers engage with the internet and advertisers reach consumers, DV has developed the industry's most effective and cost-efficient solutions to verify that those video ad interactions are viewable, secure, and suitable, positioning us perfectly to continue to further capitalize on this trend. Moreover, with digital ad spend outside the United States growing at nearly double the rate of domestic growth per MAGNA Global, DV has invested in more global resources than any other company in our sector, positioning us to take full advantage of this trend. Building on these achievements, our accelerating momentum is evident in the numerous RFPs we won in the first half of the year and in an enterprise deal pipeline that has never been stronger, with greenfield and competitive opportunities set to fuel our resurgent measurement and leading activation businesses for the next several quarters. Key expansions and new logo wins in the Q2 include Philip Morris and Bacardi across multiple geographies worldwide, Panera in the United States, Anheuser-Busch InBev, and British Petroleum in LatAm, Universal Pictures and Subway in EMEA, and Amazon Books, Dyson, Honda Mobility, JTI, Ajinomoto in APAC. Additionally, first-quarter wins such as Haleon and Pepsi have signed up to use key DV products, including ABS and Scibids, in additional geographies, which will help bolster our activation growth into the future. Our win rate across all opportunities remains above 80%, with 70% of our second-quarter wins being greenfield, which we define as wins where the advertiser wasn't using third-party tools for the business that DV won. These new client wins bolster our successful land-and-expand strategy, through which we grew the number of advertiser customers generating more than $200,000 over the last 12 months by 16% in the Q2. Based on our unmatched scale and differentiated solution set, we are also seizing a prime opportunity to gain market share and extend our industry leadership. With Oracle shutting down operations of Moat and Grapeshot on September 30th, we've already attracted interest from many of their advertiser and platform customers who recognize DoubleVerify's differentiated best-in-class capabilities across social activation, Scibids, CTV, and retail media. While we anticipate closing many of these opportunities by year-end, the revenue impact will really kick in in early 2025 due to the time required for onboarding and ramp-up. Moreover, we expect these customers to grow well beyond 2025 as we typically upsell from measurement to activation between the first and third years of new contracts. Let's now turn to the progress we've made across all key media environments: social, CTV, retail media networks, and the open web. Our achievements in each environment are the result of DV's growing scale and connectivity and market-defining innovation, all of which are driven by our advancements in AI and automation. We grew our social measurement revenue by 44% year over year in the Q2 of 2024, up from 32% in the Q2 of 2023, driven by growth in short-form video on TikTok, Meta Reels, and YouTube Shorts. Our independent verification of social feeds has become increasingly important to our enterprise partners navigating the high-value, high-engagement, yet sometimes challenging content in social media. Since launching our brand safety and suitability measurement solution on Meta early this year, we've had successfully sold our measurement solution to over 30 advertisers who've never activated DV on Meta before. We're excited to build on this upsell momentum over the coming months and quarters. On YouTube, we now provide comprehensive brand safety and suitability reporting for Google's latest high-performance ad solutions. With our expanded coverage, advertisers can now measure Performance Max, an AI-powered campaign tool that optimizes in real time to maximize conversions and budget efficiency. Additionally, our reporting now includes Demand Gen, a Google ad solution designed to attract and convert customers through visually engaging and relevant campaigns. Our partnerships with Pinterest and Reddit are also growing, and we've launched global brand safety and suitability measurement across both platforms and multiple languages. Using DV's AI-powered Universal Content Intelligence, we integrate advanced image, audio, and text analysis to provide accurate media quality measurement and robust brand protection. These strategic expansions and technology advancements across Meta, YouTube, Pinterest, and Reddit highlight our commitment to grow and scale our social media offerings, and we are just at the start of our growth in social measurement. In 2023, DV measured less than 5% of all U.S. S ocial impressions, according to our analysis of eMarketer data, highlighting the vast opportunity to expand our measurement footprint in a rapidly growing media environment that accounts for 60% of global digital ad spend ex-search. Moreover, we're increasingly excited about the potential for social pre-screen activation applications in the social media sector. Although we are in the early stages of pre-screen activation growth on social platforms, we believe this area could become a significant growth driver for DV, similar to how activation solutions like ABS have driven our growth in the open web. A great indicator of the potential for pre-bid solutions in social is our pre-screen solution for YouTube. With close to 100 customers, including nearly 30 of our top 100 customers, this solution drove 30% year-over-year growth in social activation revenue in the Q2. Currently, we are the only verification platform capable of closing the loop for advertisers on social media with aligned pre- and post-bid solutions, and our coverage is just beginning. We are actively developing ABS-like pre-bid applications across three additional major social platforms where we see an activation opportunity potentially as large as what we've achieved in the open web. Shifting to CTV, we grew our second-quarter CTV measurement impression volumes by 55% year-over-year. We partnered with a leading streaming network to launch a groundbreaking program-level measurement solution for advertisers on OTT devices, including CTV. Our initial test of this solution with Cox Automotive via OMG showcased granular program-level insights, for the first time providing invaluable transparency in the often opaque world of CTV advertising. We plan to expand this offering to more advertisers and streaming publishers in the coming months. Similar to our status in social, we are also in the early stages of our growth in CTV verification and have much room to expand. In 2023, DV advertiser engagements measured less than 20% of all U.S. CTV impressions based on our analysis of eMarketer data, revealing another significant opportunity to expand our measurement volumes and build our CTV market position. In addition to CTV verification, we are also now in market with a pioneering CTV attention measurement solution in partnership with TVision. Advertisers can drive ROI by measuring attention in CTV to better understand ad placement and effectiveness. According to the IAB, only 30% of advertisers have full transparency of CTV ad placements, and only 34% of CTV ads receive more than 2 seconds of active eyes-on-screen attention. DV's Authentic Attention solution, powered by impression-level DV data and TV viewer engagement data, enhances visibility into ad performance across CTV publishers and apps, enabling strategic optimizations and preventing wasted ad spending. Reflecting the growing importance of attention metrics, DV Authentic Attention increased measurement impression volumes by approximately 300% year-over-year in the Q2, with over 200 advertisers using DV Authentic Attention this year. Although the scale of our attention business remains relatively small, its impact on our ability to differentiate our platform en route to closing and expanding enterprise deals has been significant. With the Oracle-fueled expansion of RFP opportunities currently in play, having differentiators like Authentic Attention will play an important part in driving a highly favorable win ratio. Moving to retail media networks, our retail media supply-side solution delivered over 50% revenue growth, significantly contributing to our overall supply-side growth rate of 26% year-over-year. We provide comprehensive solutions to retail media platforms, ensuring platform-wide fraud protection and brand safety standards. Additionally, we empower platforms to make real-time and long-term viewability optimizations across all inventory with insights based on our MRC-accredited measurement. Furthermore, we enable platforms to leverage DV's contextual classifications to curate premium contextual segments of inventory. Led by our partnerships with leading retail media platforms such as Amazon and Walmart, our global reach and connectivity in retail media continue to expand. DV's measurement tags are now accepted on over 100 key global retail media networks and sites, including 15 of the top retail media platforms and 88 major retailers. More than one-third of these partners support DV measurement on their owned and operated as well as off-site inventory. Within the supply side, we also sign Dailymotion, an online video sharing platform, as well as several high-profile publisher customers such as Ziff Davis, Complex Networks, and The Independent. Finally, turning to our open web activation products, several factors give us confidence in a stronger growth trajectory. First, our measurement momentum and the historical subsequent activation upsell motion indicate renewed strength in our activation business in the future. Second, we expect ABS's growth to improve in the second half as new customers ramp up on activation and ABS. From a long-term perspective, while over 90 of our top 100 customers use ABS, close to 40% of their business lines have yet to adopt it, and there is even greater potential for growth among our top 500 customers. Third, given the strong interest from advertisers and agencies, we anticipate Scibids AI will exceed our expectations in the second half of the year and beyond. Expansion of our activation and measurement solutions across the open web remains a key part of our Verify Everywhere strategy, as advertisers continue to lean into the efficient performance opportunities that the open web entails, particularly in light of the recent change in position from Google regarding cookies. We believe that Google's announcement to step back from blocking third-party cookies by default on Chrome will instill confidence in buyers to spread across programmatic channels and create additional growth opportunities for our advertiser, platform, and publisher customers. We also see the open web as a beneficiary of the expected increase in political spending in the latter half of the year, and we plan to support that via our recently launched Authentic News Initiative, which is an investment in market education and product development that will create a more flexible, transparent way for advertisers to support open web news content while still protecting brand equity. In conclusion, the Q2 was an important positive inflection point for DoubleVerify, marked by accelerated revenue growth and significant expansion milestones. We won numerous RFPs, strengthened our enterprise pipeline, and continued to innovate across social, CTV, and retail media networks. With vast opportunities in social and CTV measurement, anticipated improvement in activation in ABS, and strong momentum for Scibids AI, we are confident in our near and long-term growth prospects. We remain committed to delivering unparalleled value and driving sustained growth for all of our stakeholders and look forward to updating you on our ongoing progress and achievements. With that, let me turn the call over to Nicola. Thanks, Mark, and good afternoon, everyone. Our Q2 results achieved the high end of our revenue guidance and exceeded our adjusted EBITDA expectations, driven by double-digit growth across all three of our revenue lines: activation, measurement, and supply side. Total revenue grew 17% in the Q2 to $156 million. Advertiser revenue increased 16% in the Q2, driven by higher volumes. Media transaction measures, or MTMs, increased 22% year-over-year, while measured transaction fees, or MTFs, declined 5% year-over-year due to product and geographic mix. As expected, premium-priced activation represented a smaller portion of total revenue compared to the prior year period. More significantly, as Mark mentioned, the Q2 of 2024 marked the first time DV impressions outside North America represented just over half of DV's total measured impressions, with measurement impressions within North America growing over 20% and measurement impressions outside North America growing over 50%. While we expect MTFs to remain stable on a per-product basis, we anticipate overall MTFs to reflect the impact of a greater shift towards measurement impression volumes. Within measurement, we foresee a continued increase in international impressions, driven by DV's global client expansion and international market share gains. Our profitability and margins remain robust, and we continue to be strategically focused on volume-led revenue growth. DV has significant potential to continue to expand across international markets, and particularly on social media platforms. By initially engaging customers through measurement, we can upsell our premium-priced activation solutions. Measurement data feeds into our activation solutions, helping advertisers optimize their media spend effectively. We aim to capitalize on this opportunity in social media, where pre-screen MTFs are nearly triple the price of measurement MTFs. Activation revenue increased by 12% compared to the prior year. All four activation solution groupings: ABS, core programmatic, social activation, and Scibids contributed to the Q2 growth. ABS, which accounted for 53% of activation revenue this quarter, grew 7% year-over-year. Similar to the Q1, the group of slow-starting retail and CPG advertisers who are heavy users of ABS delivered an uneven spend pattern that continued to impact ABS growth in the Q2. We achieved solid ABS upsell momentum, with 65% of our top 500 customers activating the product in the Q2, up from nearly 60% a year ago. Additionally, new advertisers such as Haleon and Pepsi have activated ABS and are expected to expand their use of the product. Scibids continued to perform in line with plan in the Q2. Based on customer usage and adoption patterns, we anticipate an accelerated growth trajectory for Scibids in the second half of the year. And lastly, our pre-screen social activation solutions achieved a robust 30% year-over-year growth rate in the Q2. Turning to measurement, revenue increased 22% year-over-year, primarily driven by existing customer expansion on social. Social revenue increased 44% year-over-year and represented 49% of measurement revenue in the quarter. Growth in social measurement continued to be led by Meta and YouTube, which combined accounted for approximately 80% of our Q2 social measurement revenue, with TikTok being a distant third. Global expansion of new deals and growth in social media measurement drove international measurement revenue, which increased 29% compared to the prior year and represented 29% of total measurement revenue, up from 28% in the Q2 of 2023. Finally, supply-side revenue grew 26% in the Q2, driven primarily by greater usage of DV solutions on retail media platforms such as Amazon. Shifting to expenses, cost of revenue decreased by less than 1% year-over-year in the Q2 due to savings resulting from the company's migration to cloud services and to efficiencies gained in video classification costs. These cost reductions were partially offset by the growth in activation revenue, which led to increased partner costs from revenue-sharing arrangements. Revenue less cost of sales reached 83% in the Q2, exceeding our expectation of 80% to 82%. For the second half of the year, we anticipate maintaining revenue-led cost of sales at the higher end of the 80%-82% range. Research and development expenses increased due to continued investment in AI and machine learning engineering resources. As mentioned last quarter, we also invested in additional sales and marketing resources, including technical programmatic analysts, to promote and sell our latest product launches such as Scibids. These investments will contribute to sales and marketing expense growth throughout the year. General and administrative expenses remain relatively stable year-over-year as our growing scale helps leverage this operating expense line effectively. Adjusted EBITDA of $47 million in the Q2 represented a 30% margin and was ahead of expectations due to both higher revenues and lower cost of revenue. We delivered net cash from operations of approximately $36 million, up from $11 million in Q2 2023, primarily due to strong cash collections. Capital expenditures were approximately $7 million compared to approximately $3.5 million in Q2 2023. We ended the quarter with approximately $256 million of cash on hand, including investments in T-bills with maturities over three months. Total cash and short-term investments were $339 million. In the Q2, we repurchased 1.4 million shares of Common Stock for $25 million. Following the quarter's end, we repurchased an additional 1.3 million shares for an additional $25 million. As of July 30th, we had $100 million authorized and available for further repurchases. Our approach to share repurchases will remain balanced, taking into account market conditions and other capital priorities, including investing in our core business for sustained long-term growth and an acquisition that can accelerate our product roadmap and our market expansion. Turning to guidance, we're raising the midpoints of our full-year guidance based on our Q2 performance and remain confident in our anticipated growth re-acceleration in the second half of the year. We expect Q3 revenue to range between $167-$171 million, which represents a 17% year-over-year growth at the midpoint. We expect Q3 Adjusted EBITDA to range between $49-$53 million, which represents a 30% margin at the midpoint. For the Q3, we expect stock-based compensation to range between $23-$26 million and weighted average diluted shares outstanding to range between 172-175 million shares. For full-year 2024 guidance, we expect revenue to range between $667-$675 million, which represents a 17% year-over-year growth at the midpoint, and we expect adjusted EBITDA to range between $206-$214 million, which represents a 31% margin at the midpoint. We expect the second half of the year to contribute approximately 56% of full-year revenue, broadly in line with last year's second half performance. Our outlook for the second half reflects an acceleration to 18% revenue growth, up from 16% achieved in the first half. This is driven by multiple growth vectors, including sustained social revenue growth, accelerating momentum in Scibids, successful conversion of our high-confidence pipeline into wins, and continued growth in supply side, particularly within retail media platforms. We have not changed our outlook or expected impact from the quarter of 6 large retail and CPG advertisers that we previously mentioned as having uneven spend patterns in this year. As noted last quarter, the reduced spending from these advertisers is due to specific issues within each company. Other retail and CPG advertisers are performing at or above expectations. Finally, our second half guidance does not factor in meaningful incremental revenue from increased adoption of our measurement solution on Meta, nor does it assume increased contribution from former Moat advertiser and platform customers to account for the time required to onboard and ramp. We expect these two opportunities to be contributors in 2025 and beyond. In conclusion, we achieved a strong Q2 with double-digit revenue growth across all 3 revenue lines, robust profits, and substantial cash flow. We ended the quarter with zero debt and $339 million in cash on hand in short-term investments, and our focus on executing to drive strong growth momentum for the second half of the year. And with that, we will open the line for questions. Operator, please go ahead. Thank you. We will now be conducting a question-and-answer session. [Operator's Instructions]. Our first questions come from the line of Youssef Squali with Truist Securities. Please proceed with your questions. Thank you, guys, and congrats on a nice print. Two questions, if I may. You touched on this a little bit, but with Moat exiting the market, how much of their business do you think is still up for grabs? How many of the new logos you added came from them? I only saw one that I recognize in Anheuser-Busch, but maybe there are more. And then can you talk about the level of adoption of brand safety and suitability within the Meta News Feed? L ast time you talked about having about 40 customers testing it. And do you just have any estimates for the level of contribution for the second half, Nicola? Thank you. Thanks for the questions, Youssef. So let me take the first part of this. W ith regard to the Moat kind of clients, we've already, earlier this year, made some pretty good traction against many of their customers, including folks like Pepsi, Ulta, AB, InBev, etc. But there's still a good number of customers in play. Some of the, you know, some pretty big brands and a decent amount of revenue. W e are knee-deep in those RFP processes, and those include both advertiser opportunities and platform opportunities. And we see those coming together in Q4 with, as Nicola noted, the real impact as those businesses begin to scale up into 2025. One of the nice things about this entry point is Moat was a relatively simple product set. They didn't have a lot of bells and whistles on what they're able to do. W e can go in with a pretty basic offering, but really have a great opportunity to upsell over time, which i s going to be the unique, really unique opportunity across those customers. And then per your second question, the adoption of Meta across some key advertisers. So far this year, we've added a bunch. F olks like AB InBev, Best Buy, Ulta Beauty, Choice Hotels, Haleon, J&J, greater than 30 new advertisers who had not worked with us on Meta before. W e've got some great traction there. T hose need to scale up over time. I t's following the pattern and the plan that we had, which is we're going to go after folks internally who are current customers of DV who haven't used us across Meta, go after them first. And then as we onboard new partners, folks like Haleon and others, we'll start to upsell them over time. Y oussef, for the last part of your question, w e've been very consistent on just having a very measured contribution from the Meta upsell into our number for the fiscal year, and we haven't changed our approach or our guidance forward for the second half. The second half of this year is all about adoption, testing, contracting, with the future contribution being in 2025. Got it. Okay. Thank you both. S ure. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Eric Sheridan with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your questions. Thanks so much for taking the question. Maybe building on Youssef's question, just in terms of thinking out through the remainder of this year and beyond, how do you think about the building momentum around revenue as you execute against some of the elements of partnerships that you've brought into the ecosystem over the last 12-18 months? And can you couple that also with how much of the path forward is about execution against the opportunity versus some of the investments that still need to be made to set you up for the long-term growth opportunity? Thanks so much. Thanks for the question, Eric. So we've talked incessantly about the numerous growth drivers we have in the business, everything from social, which continues to be really strong, to our Scibids business, which has been really a nice accelerator for us. W hen we look at building momentum into the second half of this year and into next year, it's those plus our business outside the U.S. now, which we've measured more impressions outside of the U.S., is the continued growth in CTV. All of those were investments that we've made in the past, right? We've invested in CTV solutions. We invested in our social footprint by not just building new tools across places like Meta and YouTube, but expanding the number of platforms we work with, folks like Reddit. We've got a lot of arrows in our quiver already that we're using right now that we're building momentum against. As we close new customers, so whether they're Moat customers or those Greenfield customers, of which 70% of our new closes were Greenfield, we're going to use all those investments to build against that growth profile. W e've done a lot of that already. It doesn't mean we're stopping, and we're continuing to lean into things like our AI technology to recognize challenging content across video at scale and do so super efficiently, which has allowed us to drive an industry-leading gross margin. W e'll continue to lean into those tools, but a lot of the momentum that we've built already is based on investments that we've made in people and technology over the last several quarters. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Laura Martin with Needham & Company. Please proceed with your questions. Thank you. I also have two. Could we drill down on Scibids? T he original idea was we were going to try to get an upsell there as a% of ad revenue. I know it's been helping you get new business, but that's what I'm interested in. What's the conversion rate then after they try it? Are you still getting paid as a percent of ad revenue rather than a fixed fee? H ave you been able to actually get an upsell, or is it becoming just part of the core product? That's my first question. My second question is on your cost philosophy. Your costs this year we're projecting are going to grow faster than your revenue, whereas for the past two years, your total operating expense has grown about half as fast as your revenue. So could you talk about your cost philosophy as the revenue has sort of slowed here to the 17% level for the year? Thank you. Thanks, Laura. I'll take the Scibids question, and Nicola will talk about costs. W ith regard to Scibids, i t is an absolutely additive upsell that we are still selling as a percentage of media. We've not bundled it into our solution yet. We've connected it. So we've connected it, for example, to our attention data to make some pretty unique solutions. But ultimately, we see this as additive. It's part of our activation business and part of our activation line that continues to grow. And it's an optimization tool that is incremental to our core business, not something w e need to bundle at this stage as part of that. T he reason why we're seeing traction, and we believe in that, is that we've seen traction outside of customers who don't even work with us on our core bundle. T hat's been an interesting opportunity for us to get discussions going with large brands that may work with our competitors. To do that, you have to have a product that you can sell separately, that can act separately, and then will monetize separately. O n the cost philosophy, really, it's an investment philosophy towards areas where we think we can accelerate our market share in the market, which is what we've been able to accomplish over the last few years. So if we find ways to invest that allow us to grow at a faster clip, we will continue to do so. We're still achieving margins that are above 30%. This quarter, we beat our guidance expectation on EBITDA. We're particularly focused on having achieved higher gross margins, which are really the result of us having invested for several quarters into that line, and now we are able to show a higher gross margin. So where we see opportunities to invest within the range of our EBITDA guidance, which is just over 30%, we will continue to do that because we believe that that's how we're gaining share in the market. Thank you. Appreciate it. Thanks, Laura. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Matt Swanson with RBC Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions. Yeah. Thank you so much for the time and taking my questions. Mark, you mentioned that this quarter that video impressions grew faster or, sorry, more video impressions than display. This is kind of a common occurrence in calls with investors of wondering about does increasing video, even though it's a higher fee, impact volume to the point where it might have a net negative impact. I was just curious the dynamics that you're seeing around there, where you're still seeing strong results as video is ramping up. Yeah. It's a great question, Matt. There's a bunch of different dynamics going on here. You've got a whole ton of new inventory flooding into the market, right? What that's doing is adding opportunities for measurement, particularly across platforms like Amazon and Amazon Prime. It's also suppressing CPMs a bit. You're seeing lower CPMs across CTV, which mean significantly higher volumes. T hat dynamic that there may have been some concern about for businesses like ours, where we're a volume-driven business, has started to shift, which is more volume, slightly lower CPMs, and then just incremental players coming into the market that allow for measurement opportunities. And that's why we saw CTV growth in the 50%+ zone, 55%+ over the quarter. So video, and particularly CTV i s going to be a nice driver for us moving ahead. Those CPMs are starting to slip a bit as more and more inventory comes into the market, creating bigger opportunity for volume-based businesses like ours. Yeah. That's really helpful, color. And then one more, maybe on kind of the positive surprise we got from the supply-side business. You mentioned that you feel like this is repeatable. Can you just give us maybe a sense of the scale of that retail media network opportunity, or if there's anything else that you think drives that line in the future, just a little more color there? O ur supply-side business had a nice pop. And the reason why we look at this as sustainable, it's very much like a pure SaaS software type application where once you get a deal set in, they're pretty safe and pretty structured. So you're going to see that for several quarters moving ahead, that that increase year-over-year is going to sit there. So it's sustainable. Plus, that's not even accounting for some of the potential upside we would get from Moat clients. So we feel pretty good about the supply-side part of our business continuing to grow, especially due to the fact that a big chunk of that is being driven by retail media networks. So if you look at our supply-side retail media network business grew 50% year-over-year last quarter. So you've got a bunch of different drivers playing out there, the retail media network aspect of it, some Moat clients that will eventually roll through at the tail end of the year. And the fact that those tend to be very sticky, non-volume-based deals, that when you lap them over the next few quarters, they'll continue to show that same level of growth. Thank you. For sure. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Andrew Boone with JMP Securities. Please proceed with your questions. Thanks so much for taking my questions. Mark, I wanted to ask about ABS further slowing in Q/Q. Look at what's 12% in 1Q and then slow to 7% in 2Q. Is there any additional pressure or anything else to call out about kind of those 5 points? And then secondly, if I look at activation overall and its faster growth, it appears that non-ABS revenue was very healthy in 2Q. Is that Scibids or is there any other explanation that you want to highlight as we think about that aspect of revenue? Thanks so much. I'll take the second part first. When we look at non-ABS programmatic, it did grow pretty nicely over the quarter. T hat does include Scibids, but it also includes core programmatic. So think of the basic non-ABS solutions, pre-bid brand safety, pre-bid viewability, etc. So we saw pretty decent activation strength in the non-ABS sector. When it comes to ABS, and we said, "Look, w e're going to see some softness driven by that cohort of six players," and they were heavy ABS vendors. That has stabilized a bit, and we've got some pretty interesting existing user expansions that have occurred with Home Depot, Southwest, Pfizer, Mondelez, and some upsells and activations with GM, Aldi, Pepsi, Allstate, and others that we believe are going to put a little fire under that ABS growth number moving ahead. O bviously, we would love to see that number be bigger. The great part about our activation business is we've got lots of other aspects of it as well. Pre-screen social, which we've talked about, which grew well, that non-ABS number that you called out also are helping our activation business grow double digits. Thank you. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Michael Graham with Canaccord Genuity. Please proceed with your questions. All right. Thanks a lot. Just two questions. The first, I just wanted to ask on the competitive landscape, how much has the Moat withdrawal really impacted things, and just are you seeing any changes to the competitive landscape relative to the first part of the year? And I wanted to ask also on the guidance, I believe that you mentioned that you hadn't changed your expectations regarding the handful of CPG and retail customers that you had taken out of guidance previously. I just wanted to ask if you're seeing any progress or evolution from that group and just if there are any major puts and takes to the second-half guidance that we should keep in mind as we're thinking about sensitivity. Well, thanks for the question, Mike. I'll take the first part. w ith regard to the competitive landscape, it's always an interesting dynamic when a competitor just literally drops off the map the way Oracle did with Moat. The interesting thing, though, is if you look at the deals in play, our sales team is the best in the business, and they'd already been on top of all of those customers even before Moat went out of business. So the dynamic was the fact that it just kind of accelerated some of the discussions, t hat had already been going on. But it certainly made this a much more pressing decision for both advertisers and the platform customers out there. So competitive dynamics changed, got faster. We're in the midst of literally dozens of RFPs right now. T hat that's probably the biggest change. It did open the door to some smaller competitors coming in and taking a shot where they may have not had the opportunity before. I t's a good thing for the space. It shows where a broad-based, differentiated solution set like DV has is going to win because a lot of these clients, there's a good number of enterprise clients that will have to find solutions both on the platform side and on the advertiser side. O n the guidance question, Michael, for the cohort of six, they did perform in line with our expectations that we already baked into our conversations from last quarter. We have not adjusted guidance either up or down for that cohort. The puts and takes for the second half of the year, we are feeling like we have multiple growth factors that are going to help in the second half, including continued social growth. We are seeing some accelerated momentum in Scibids. And then the continued growth in supply side, which is what Mark was already mentioning. We do have some large clients that are in the pipeline that we expect to close. And then on the take side, we did not assume material upside from either Moat clients, given the time it might take to integrate and ramp them. And we've been very consistent on not having a large contribution from a Meta brand safety in the fiscal year. Perfect. Thanks a lot, guys. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Raimo Lenschow with Barclays. Please proceed with your questions. Perfect. Thanks for squeezing me in. I actually wanted to stay on both of those subjects. So on the Moat side, can you speak about how much extra resources you need to kind of get those guys ramped and ramped in a timely manner? And what does that mean for investment horizon? And then on the CPG customers, i f you look at the earnings season on the CPG segment, at the moment, it doesn't really look good. Does that kind of, is there kind of a concern it might feed into you? And kind of is that something that is factored into the guidance? Thank you. Raimo. On t he potential Moat customers, w e're pretty well-staffed to handle those roll-ups. D epending on how quickly we need to ramp them up, we may need to add a small amount of incremental headcount, but nothing significant, nothing that would be outside of what we had really planned anyways for the year, and maybe just accelerate them a bit. So we don't see a significant amount of additional expenses against the Moat up ramp. With regard to CPG, we have not seen any degradation or any kind of predictions from our partners that they're going to be reducing spend over the second half of the year. As a matter of fact, our CPG and many of our retail customers outside of the cohort that we've already identified are actually doing well and are on plan, if not slightly ahead of plan, of what we expected. So we haven't seen any spend reductions yet, haven't heard of any. For the most part, we're pretty well in line with the fact that the macro is going to be pretty stable for the rest of the year. Perfect. Thank you. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Tim Nollen with Macquarie Asset Management. Please proceed with your questions. Hi. It's Tim from Macquarie Capital. Could you please, I'm running out of questions here because you covered a lot in the presentation, so that's great. Could you please give a point of clarification, though? On the global expansion, Y ou said you grew two times the rate of the US. Was that primarily greenfield? You gave us 70% of wins being greenfield. I wasn't sure if that was relating to international growth or not. So that's really what the question is. Was it kind of white space new opportunities, or was it competitive wins? F ollowing on that, how well-penetrated was or is Moat internationally? Is that a particular opportunity internationally, or is Moat more of a US opportunity? Thanks. Yeah, Tim. So on the second half of your question, Moat was definitely stronger outside of the US over the last few years than they were in the U.S. A lot of that had to do with the fact that they had a relatively basic toolset and had pretty competitive pricing on that toolset, which allowed them to kind of distribute pretty cheaply in some markets that were much lower margin. T hat being said, w e do see some growth opportunities in our international business as a result of the Moat deprecation. And with regard to the 70% wins, those are greenfield across all markets, so not just international. It includes the US as well. T hat's been consistent with us, if you remember, with the exception o f one quarter over the last several years, a majority of our deals have been greenfield. And those are deals in which the advertiser did not use our product or any competitive or similar product, which, again, is a testament to the fact that we've got lots of room to grow. And we've got lots of room to grow, not just in North America, but outside the U.S., with advertisers who still are being introduced to our products. And that gives us a really solid TAM opportunity over the next several years. Great. Thank you. For sure. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Brian Pitz with BMO Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions. Thanks for the question. Q uickly on political, obviously topical here, especially around inflammatory content and misinformation. How much of a tailwind do you think the election can be to your business? And what have you seen? I know it's early on in the campaign cycle. That's point one. Point two, any negative CTV industry impact from things like the Euro Cup or Copa America over that kind of month-long period across June and July? Any sense that that could have pulled folks away from CTV? Thanks. Thanks, Brian, for the question. So with regard to political, w e've kind of already said we're not a huge direct beneficiary of political dollars just due to the fact that we've got relatively sophisticated solutions that need to be employed over a long period of time. There's learnings, etc. But we do kind of think there's a little bit of a tailwind that comes from, for example, a broader engagement across social. As people get more and more involved in elections, you see social volumes go up. Open Web news engagement increases over time, so we'll see volumes on Open Web platforms, which is one of the reasons why we're investing in our Authentic News Initiative to continue to support advertisers who want to place dollars across news properties but still are concerned about kind of incendiary news topics. W e will see some benefits to us. It's certainly not a headwind, but I don't think we see the direct kind of monetizable tailwind that some others in the space do. On the CTV side, we didn't see much friction at all from the other events that you noted. The addition of Netflix's growing ad tier, which we work with, as well as Amazon introducing inventory into the market, whom we work with, helped really fuel that 55% growth rate that we saw in the quarter for CTV impressions. Still relatively small compared to our overall volume, but as part of our video impression pool, it's growing, and we think that's, again, a catalyst for us moving ahead. Great. Thanks. You got it. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Mark Kelley with Stifel. Please proceed with your question. Great. Thank you very much. Two quick ones. Sorry to go back to Moat, but curious if you think there's like an $80 million total opportunity number kind of floating out there. Does that seem right to you? Not necessarily what you think you can win. As part of that, any way to think about the split between advertiser and publisher exposure that Moat had? And the second one is just going back to the political component. T here's a lot of brands that are kind of just avoiding news content altogether around the election, not necessarily because of your products, but just trying to avoid potential negative news flow. Does that impact you either way if that's the case just around November? Thank you. R egarding to the Moat number, t here's been numbers kicked around in that zone. T here is a significant opportunity there, both on the platform and advertiser side. A chunk of that is longer tail, which s ome of it may drop off, may just not be interesting for companies like DV to go after because it's just too small to manage. But there's a good chunk out there. Y ou're looking at $tens of millions of opportunities against that Moat business. The breakdown between platform and advertiser, p robably roughly 50/50 if you're looking at it. It would be my guess. But there's still a good chunk of business out there to go after. But as I noted before, a lot of their bigger brands we already had in play. So we took Pepsi from them, Ulta, AB InBev earlier this year. And some of the other discussions that we've had with some of the big advertisers have been going on since well before that business went out. W e think there's good opportunity there. With regard to political, t hat's exactly what we're trying to lean into with the Authentic News Initiative, which is helping advertisers better navigate news content without just turning it off. We think there's a whole lot of value in advertisers being part of the dialogue, but doing so in a safe and suitable way. And we've always prided ourselves on the fact that we can give them the tools, the scalpel, as opposed to the meat cleaver to say, "Look, rather than just cut off news, let's try to navigate our way through this in a way that allows us to be part of the discussion without part of the problem." We do see that as an opportunity for us. And those dollars, even if they do move away from news, ultimately, they're going to be spent somewhere. If they get spent on social, we're on social. If they get spent on CTV, we're on CTV. So that Verify Everywhere strategy that we have is really all about dealing with the ebbs and flows of dollars across different platforms. All right. Thank you, Mark. You got it. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Vasily Karasov with Cannonball Research. Please proceed with your questions. Thank you. Good afternoon. Wanted to ask you about retail media revenue. If I'm reading the slide correctly here, 62% of retail media revenue was an activation. So that is programmatic. And we know that the majority of retail media revenue is not programmatic at this point. M y question is, A, is this the breakdown between the different revenue lines that you report that you expect sort of to see going forward, or do you think it will be changing? And the other question is, can you tell us what kind of gating factors there are that prevent you from growing this revenue stream, retail media faster, because for some other companies, it is definitely a much bigger contributor? Thank you. Thanks, Vasily, for the questions. So regarding the activation aspect of our retail media network business, think of that as the audience extension part of retail media network. When they buy off-site, that off-site buys, many of them are transacted through DSPs. And those DSPs engage DV tools through the retail media networks to actually help ensure that those off-site buys are safe and secure. T hat's where our activation portion of that business really exists. W ith regard to what this business looks like moving ahead, I do think supply side is going to continue to grow as we see our engagements with folks like Amazon, Walmart, and others grow on the supply side. M easurement st ays probably the third in that tier just due to the fact that the way that measurement gets engaged is many times through a supply side implementation, right? So we provide a base level of measurement, base level of security on that supply side platform. So the growth we'll see will come really through the activation and supply side lines on that business. With regard to growing retail media business faster, w e saw a pretty significant growth rate of 50%+ on the supply side. T hat if that's going to be the fastest growing part of that retail media network business, I t's a pretty good clip. If there's any friction anywhere, it would just be due to the fact that if the advertisers start looking at more efficient spend to other places, right? I don't think there's any really market conditions or market barriers for us growing that other than the dollars flowing into RMNs if they get shifted back to social or to other networks that perform just as well. Thank you. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Yun Kim with Loop Capital Markets. Please proceed with your questions. Thank you. First, quickly on Scibids. Can you update us on where we are in regard to the Scibids integration? Are we still somewhat 12-18 months away from the full integration? W e're on path with integration. So we've integrated sales and sales organizations. We've integrated a good amount of their technology and platform into our operational structure. The overhead teams, so marketing and finance and legal and all those, have been fully integrated. So we're well on our way to integrating those teams. We do see an advantage of operating that business very similar to almost how YouTube is operated by Google. So we have teams that kind of are able to execute and run on their own to innovate. We loved the innovation that was coming out of the data science teams in Paris. They want to keep them running hard on that, so not get them encumbered in some of the bigger company overhead that we're involved in. I ntegration-wise, we're pretty far down the path. We still have some work to do on UIs and some dataset integrations. But for the most part, we're well on schedule, and we've seen the benefits in that business continuing to grow. Mark, also, over the next two or next year or two, can you share your view on the pricing dynamics on social, especially on short videos and CTVs? Obviously, CPM rates on these form of channels seem to be changing? F rom our perspective, social pricing and social business, the dynamics there have been pretty consistent over the years. S ocial video, we charge more or less the same as we do across any other video. Social displays is, again, a similar type of measurement and charge the same amount there. Those CPMs, broadly speaking, are really going to be driven by performance, right? Number one, the media performance. Our CPMs a cross social and including social video, are going to be continued to enhance as we can move more towards social activation solutions. So currently, our social activation solutions are priced about three times our social measurement solutions. So as we are able to expand into activation more broadly across social platforms, W e have an opportunity to get a more significant bump in MTF across social than we have today. Great. Thank you so much. Sure. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Arjun Bhatia with William Blair. Please proceed with your questions. Hi. Thanks. This is Chris on for Arjun. I wanted to circle back to a comment you made about launching some ABS-like capabilities on social. I w anted to get a sense of what the timeline looks like to that and whether it'll be very similar in terms of functionality and pricing as ABS? Yeah. So it's a great question. So right now, we're in the midst of kind of negotiations and development across multiple different social platforms to look at the implementation of these types of tools. We know that social pre-screen, like we've seen on YouTube, has real value and has gotten really strong traction across our top 100 customers, and we can charge a premium for it, right? P ricing-wise, our social activation tools, we charge about three times what we charge for social measurement. And that's a positive thing. So we do see a similar kind of potential when it comes to social pre-screen or activation tools as we saw on the Open Web. That's what gets us excited, is that we think that there's a pretty significant business there. Now, it's going to take again, this is not something that we launch overnight. It takes negotiations. It takes development work. But as we look into the next several quarters, we think there's opportunities for us to continue to get traction there. And as we look at 2025 and beyond s ocial activation is going to be a much bigger part of our business than it is today. Got it. That makes sense. And then just one last question on Moat. For these customers, since they've already been using a similar product with another platform, is there any difference in the amount of time that you expect for them to ramp on average? T here's still some of the similar testing that the advertisers want to take to ensure that they are understanding how to implement the solutions, that they can understand the data that they get out of the tools, how they implement it, particularly if it's a pre- and post-bid connection. So there is ramping. There's no other way to put it. Advertisers are under probably the most pressure to close the deals. And that's what we've seen, is that the deal pressure has been around closing and moving fast there, faster than we've ever seen. But the ramping still is a ramping process, right? It's implementation in markets. In some cases, whether it's mandated or an option, that takes part of it. So there'll be some ramping. T he faster part of the process has been in the sales. Ramping will still occur very similar to what we've seen in the past. Got it. Thank you. Sure. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Mark Murphy with JP Morgan. Hi, this is Arti for Mark Murphy. Congrats on the quarter, and thanks for squeezing me in. Just wanted to ask about the remarks made about Scibids and the expectation that they'd exceed in the second half. Be great to double-click on that and hear kind of what's giving you that confidence. Is there a particular aspect attached to trade pipeline, pipeline conversion, or any other aspect you think might be worth calling out there? Thanks. It's a great question. W hat we're seeing is, A, a strong pipeline and a strong pipeline of conversions that we're able to close the first half of the year that are starting to ramp the second half of the year. And then volumes, volumes and CPMs. So the customers that were closed earlier this year are starting to scale, as I noted. And since we're a percentage of media business, CPMs have been pretty healthy, if not growing. T hose factors give us confidence that we're able to continue to grow that business in a way that is slightly ahead of our plans and expectations. Thanks. And then, Nicola, just when we're looking at the share repo program, any insight into kind of what motivated that for the here and now? And is there any kind of framework we can think about going forward or the cadence of the buybacks? Thank you. I n terms of where we are with the company and the capital structure of the company and usage of our funds, we're now at a point where it becomes one of the many priorities that we have around how to use capital. So our view on it is it's going to be a balanced approach around repurchases so that we can continue to often invest in the business and look at potential acquisitions. Obviously, the stock price was at a point that it made it attractive for us to begin a program that's going to be on a fairly balanced basis quarter- after- quarter. Perfect. Thank you. That's encouraging. Thank you. Our next questions come from the line of Omar Dessouky with Bank of America. Please proceed with your questions. Hey, thanks. A couple of questions on social and then a question on the supply. So it looks like you broke out what your growth rate was for social activation. And I was wondering if you could also tell us what the mix of social activation within activation was? So cial activation, we noted, grew about 30%. A lot of that is pre-screen. So it's the pre-screen on YouTube. And that's a pretty small percentage of overall activation, maybe around 5% of our total activation business. So small, continuing to grow. But as we noted in our remarks, it's a premium price, just the way activation is premium priced versus measurement on the Open Web. And we think there's a lot of solid potential there as well. Got it. La st quarter, yo u said that there were 9 of your top 100 customers that turned on Meta for the first time. This quarter, you've said that there are 30, but you didn't say whether they're within the top 100 or not. I was more interested in the top 100 specifically. How many of your top 100 customers have turned on Meta since you launched brand suitability? W e had 9 of our top 100 that were testing it in the first half. We converted a few of those. The rest of them are still kind of testing and looking at whether or not they want to turn it on to scale. So we're still engaged with a significant amount of our top 100 customers. We did close 30 new Meta partners since the beginning of the year. Some of those may have not fallen into the top 100, but t hey're big brands, and they will become some of our bigger or they will fall into the top 100 over the year. So a handful of the nine have converted. The rest are still testing. W e've got opportunities. As we noted, some brands here like Best Buy, AB InBev, Expedia, J&J, Haleon. These are all guys that closed with us on Meta in the first half of the year. Some of them are top 100, s ome of them could be potentially top 100 moving forward. Thank you. And just the last question now. So your commentary on supply side, obviously pretty strong. I was wondering whether the margin structure of supply-side business differs from your demand-side businesses, especially on gross margin and operating costs, if you could give me any color there? O mar, as you know, the supply-side business is truly a SaaS-type business. So the gross margin profile is different there. There's also no rev share, and it is at a higher gross margin. And the operating costs, any difference there? No, this is the same data set that we use for all of our revenue lines now. Thank you. For sure. Thank you. We have reached the end of our question and answer session. I would now like to turn the floor back over to CEO Mark Zagorski for closing remarks. Thank you all for your time today. Remain excited about the significant opportunities that lie ahead. We definitely look forward to seeing many of you at our upcoming conferences in the coming months. Have a great evening. Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference. We appreciate your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Enjoy the rest of your day.