Greetings. Welcome to Eagle Point Credit Company Incorporated First Quarter 2023 Financial Results Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. Please note this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to Garrett Edson of ICR. Thank you. You may begin. Thank you, Sherry. Good morning. By now, everyone should have access to our earnings announcement investor presentation, which was released prior to this call, which may also be found on our website at eaglepointcreditcompany.com. Before we begin our formal remarks, we need to remind everyone that the matters discussed on this call include forward-looking statements or projected financial information that involve risks and uncertainties that may cause the company's actual results to differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements and projected financial information. For further information on factors that could impact the company and the statements and projections contained herein, please refer to the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each forward-looking statement and projection of financial information made during this call is based on information available to us as of the date of this call. We disclaim any obligation to update our forward-looking statements unless required by law. A replay of this call can be accessed for 30 days via the company's website, eaglepointcreditcompany.com. Earlier today, we filed our first quarter 2023 financial statements and our first quarter investor presentation with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Financial statements and our first quarter investor presentation are also available within the Investor Relations section of the company's website. Financial statements can be found by following the Financial Statements and Reports link, the investor presentation can be filed by following the Presentations and Events link. I would now like to introduce Thomas Majewski, Chief Executive Officer of Eagle Point Credit Company. Thank you, Garrett, and welcome everyone to Eagle Point Credit Company's first quarter earnings call. If you haven't done so already, we invite you to download our investor presentation from our website, which provides additional information about the company and our portfolio. The company had a very strong start to 2023. Our portfolio generated solid cash flows while we maintained a stable NAV. Despite the financial doom and gloom prognosticated by many over the past year, think of all the headlines you've read even in the last quarter. Our portfolio of CLO equity has done exactly what it was designed to do: generate solid recurring cash flows for the benefit of our investors. Indeed, for the 12 months ended March 31st, our portfolio generated $3.40 per share of recurring cash flow. Even better, our recurring cash flow in April 2023 exceeded the total of our first quarter recurring cash flow by 22%. While we continue to live in uncertain economic times, our portfolio of CLO equity was designed for periods like these. As of quarter end, our CLO equity portfolio had a weighted average remaining reinvestment period of 2.9 years, with roughly 4% of the loan market prepaying at par during the quarter and an average loan price of 93.38 during the quarter. Many of our CLOs were able to capture upside reinvesting prepayments or minimize risks as they chose in their underlying portfolios. For the first quarter, our net investment income totaled $0.34 per common share, before $0.02 per share of realized losses. We continue to actively manage our portfolio. We deployed $55.3 million of net capital into new portfolio investments during the quarter. We received recurring cash flows from our portfolio in the first quarter of $42.3 million, or $0.74 per common share, exceeding our regular distribution, regular common distribution and total expenses by $0.10 per share. As in the fourth quarter, first quarter cash flows were somewhat impacted by the mismatch between one-month and three-month LIBOR and SOFR. However, given the compression between one-month and three-month rates over the past few months, we saw a significant increase in recurring cash flows in April to over $51 million in total. We also paid a special distribution of $0.50 per common share in January of 2023. Inclusive of that special distribution, prior special distributions and other distributions we've paid through April 30th, we've now delivered $18.71 per share in cash distributions to our common stockholders since our IPO. NAV per share ended the first quarter at $9.10. Since the end of the quarter, we estimate our NAV at April month-end to be between $8.83 and $8.93, a modest decline from where it stood on March 31st. We also continued to prudently raise capital through our at-the-market program and issued over 2.6 million common shares at a premium to NAV, generating NAV accretion of about $0.05 per common share. These sales generated net proceeds of over $27 million during the first quarter. All of our financing remains fixed rate and is unsecured, and this gives us protection in a rising rate environment. Importantly, we have no financing maturities prior to April 2028. In addition to our solid first quarter performance, on May 11th, we declared regular monthly common distributions for the third quarter of $0.14 per share and an additional variable supplemental distribution of $0.02 per common share per month, which is related to our 2022 spillover income. Management currently expects to continue monthly variable supplemental distributions through the end of 2023, though the actual timing and amounts of distributions are subject to a number of factors, including the company's results of operations. As of March 31st, the weighted average effective yield on our CLO equity portfolio was 15.83%. That is a slight reduction from 16.23% where it stood at the end of December. The new equity we purchased during the first quarter had a weighted average effective yield of 18.6%, which will help bolster the portfolio's strong weighted average effective yield prospectively. As I mentioned, during the quarter, we deployed $55.3 million of net capital, primarily into secondary CLO equity as well as some CLO debt, some loan accumulation facilities, and other investments. During the quarter, the secondary market continued to maintain a significant number of attractive investment opportunities for us with a number of investments we made during the quarter having loss-adjusted effective yields in excess of 20%. As a result, we took advantage and deployed a material amount of capital on dry powder that we had into new portfolio investments. As of March 31st, our CLO equity portfolio's weighted average remaining reinvestment period stood at 2.9 years, which is a modest reduction from the 3.0 years at the end of 2022. Despite the passage of three months, through our proactive portfolio management, the reinvestment period on our CLO equity positions was modestly reduced by just about one month. We believe this continues to drive the portfolio's outperformance relative to the broader CLO equity market. We remain focused on finding opportunities to invest in CLO equity with generally longer reinvestment periods, which we believe will give us better ability to further navigate through the current volatility. I would also like to take a moment to highlight Eagle Point Income Company, which trades under the symbol EIC. EIC invests principally in junior CLO debt with a particular focus on CLO BB. For the first quarter, EIC generated net investment income of $0.49 per share, once again exceeding its regular common distributions. EIC has performed very well through the rising rate environment and remains very well positioned to generate strong net investment income over time given the long-term performance of CLO junior debt. We invite you to join EIC's investor call at 11:30 A.M. today and also to visit the company's website, eaglepointincomecompany.com, to learn more. We remain quite active in managing our portfolio and continue to keep a close eye on the broader economy. After Ken's remarks, I'll take you through the current state of the corporate loan and CLO markets and share our outlook for the remainder of 2023. I'll now turn the call over to Ken. Thanks, Tom. For the first quarter of 2023, the company recorded net investment income net of realized losses of approximately $18 million or $0.32 per share. This compares favorably to NII and realized losses of $0.29 per share in the fourth quarter of 2022, and NII and realized losses of $0.30 per share for the first quarter of 2022. When unrealized portfolio appreciation is included, the company recorded GAAP net income for the first quarter of approximately $20.1 million or $0.35 per share. This compares to GAAP net income of $0.17 per share in the fourth quarter of 2022, and a GAAP net loss of $0.53 per share in the first quarter of 2022. The company's first quarter GAAP net income was comprised of total investment income of $31.9 million and total net unrealized appreciation on investments of $7 million, offset by net unrealized appreciation on certain liabilities recorded at fair value of $5.2 million, realized capital losses of $1.1 million, financing costs and operating expenses of $12.1 million, and distributions on the Series D Preferred Stock of $0.4 million. The company's asset coverage ratios at March 31st for Preferred Stock and debt calculated pursuant to Investment Company Act requirements were 299% and 443% respectively. These measures are comfortably above the statutory requirements of 200% and 300%. Our debt and Preferred Securities outstanding at quarter end totals approximately 33% of the company's total assets, less current liabilities. This is within our target range of generally operating the company with leverage between 25%-35% of total assets under normal market conditions. Moving on to our portfolio activity in the second quarter through April 30th. The company received recurring cash flows on its investment portfolio of $51.4 million. This is significantly above the $42.3 million received during the full first quarter. Note that some of our investments are expected to make payments later in the quarter. As of April 30th, we had $45.2 million of cash available for investment. Management's estimated range of the company's NAV as of April 30th was $8.83-$8.93 per share, reflecting a 2% decrease from March 31st. During the first quarter, we paid three monthly common distributions of $0.14 per share. Subsequently, we have declared monthly regular distributions of $0.14 per share, along with a monthly variable supplemental distribution of $0.02 per share on our common stock for an aggregate common monthly distribution of $0.16 per share through September 2023. In addition, the company paid a special distribution of $0.50 per share in January, which represented a portion of the 2022 tax year spill over income. I will now hand the call back over to Tom. Great. Thank you, Ken. Let me take everyone through some thoughts on the loan and CLO markets as well. The Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index generated a total return of 3.11% during the first quarter, which was a strong start to 2023, despite the challenging environment in March. The index continued its positive momentum through April, showing the resiliency of the asset class in the midst of volatility. Notably, while the regional banking crisis in March did impact overall liquidity in the market related to CLOs and securities broadly, we have not seen much of an impact with regard to actual credit expense. Indeed, loans and CLOs continue to have very little to no exposure to the most of the regional banks in the news. Given the banking challenged environment, and the broader economic environment, we did see 10 leveraged loans default during the first quarter. ECC has exposure to well over 1,000 loans, so just to frame the materiality of that count. As a result, as of quarter end, the trailing 12-month default rate stood at 1.32%, up from the end of 2022, but still well below historical averages. Most bank research desks are expecting the default rate to end up around 3% by the end of the year. Despite the increase in defaults, during the quarter, approximately 4% of leveraged loans paid off at par. This provides our CLOs, which are in the reinvestment period, with valuable par dollars to reinvest in today's discounted loan market to offset the losses from defaults and other distressed credits. With a significant share of high-quality issuers trading their loans at discounted prices, CLO collateral managers were well-positioned to improve their underlying loan portfolios during the quarter through relative value credit selection in the secondary market. As I noted previously, as well as to capitalize on high-quality market loan issuances, nearly always coming at discounted prices in today's market. Given the market conditions, the percentage of loans trading over par continues to be essentially zero, with the Credit Suisse Leveraged Loan Index at a price of 92.67 recently. As a result, repricing in the loan market remains essentially zero. Instead, in fact, we are observing refinancing activity as loan issuers tackle their 2024 and 2025 maturities. Despite having lower financing spreads in place, loan issuers are extending their maturities by offering lenders higher spreads and new OID on their refinance loans. This has been accretive to our portfolio's weighted average spread, which in turn, increases the yields we receive on our CLO equity portfolio. On a look-through basis, the weighted average spread of our CLO's underlying loan portfolios increased 4 basis points at the end of March compared to where it stood at the end of December. This measure has now increased by 9 basis points over the last twelve months. CCC concentrations within our CLOs stood at 4.4% as of March 31, and the percentage of loans trading below 80 within our CLOs is about 6.3%. Our portfolio's weighted average junior OC cushion was 4.85% as of March 31st, which gives us significant headroom to withstand downgrades and potential credit losses. Indeed, our junior OC cushion is significantly above the 3.9% seen more broadly in the CLO market. This is not by accident, it's by design. In the CLO market, we actually saw $34 billion of new issuance during the first quarter. We believe a significant majority of this volume was backed by captive CLO funds, which are generally far less return sensitive than an economic actor like ECC. Reset and refinancing activity also remains at essentially zero due to most current CLO debt pricings being in the money. While the market gives the in-the-money nature of our CLOs financing some credit, we believe the market doesn't give it full credit and that it represents hidden value embedded in our portfolio. We believe our weighted average CLO AAA spread of 119 basis points is roughly 74 basis points in the money today. As we have noted, it is an environment of loan price volatility where we believe CLO structures, and CLO equity in particular, are set up well to buy loans at discounts to par with a very stable long-term financing structure using par pay downs from other loans and have the ability to outperform the broader corporate debt markets over the medium term, as they have done multiple times in the past. To sum up, we generated net investment income for the first quarter of $0.34 per weighted average common share. Our portfolio saw a modest increase in NAV during the quarter. We saw a significant increase in cash flows in April, which bodes well moving forward for our portfolio. We also remain very active in the quarter in terms of sourcing and deploying investments at attractive yields, particularly in the secondary market where most of our focus is today. We continued our existing regular monthly common distributions and variable supplemental common distributions through April of 2023. We strengthened our liquidity position during the quarter, generating an additional $0.05 of NAV accretion through our ATM program. We continue to maintain 100% fixed-rate financing, completely unsecured, with no maturities prior to April 2028, which gives us protection from any further rising rates and attractive cost of capital for many, many years to come. We believe the company's investment portfolio is in really good shape, and the weighted average remaining period, strong OC cushion and increasing cash flows are all evidence of that. We remain pleased to return extra cash to our investors in the form of special or supplemental distributions, and we'll remain opportunistic and proactive as we manage our portfolio with a long-term mindset as we always have. We thank you for your time and interest in Eagle Point. Ken will now open the call to your questions. Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Our first question is from Mickey Schleien with Ladenburg Thalmann. Please proceed. Good morning, Tom and Ken. Hope you're well. Tom, about a quarter of your CLO equity portfolio is beyond its reinvestment period, I think about another 15% has less than a half a year left. As you mentioned, since Triple A spreads are very wide, the CLO primary market is very slow, the opportunity to refinance and reset these is very limited. With that in mind, how do you see the fund's cash flows developing as these CLOs exit the reinvestment period and start to unwind and pay off their Triple As, which are their cheapest debt? A good question. You cited the number 25%? This is based off of the last SOI. We haven't seen this quarter's, but about a quarter of. Got it. Previous SOI was beyond the reinvestment period, and around 15% had less than half a year left. Yeah. Are you basing that on the par value or the market value? Just so I can understand. I just counted the number of positions. Got it. Okay. I haven't done the math. We can do that as a follow-up here. I would have a strong suspicion, the dollar amount of CLOs outside the reinvestment period is lower than 25%. That could very well be on the count basis, but not the dollar basis. Just thinking about other investments going into the portfolio, because once we're outside the reinvestment period, we count it as zero in that weighted average. If we're at 2.9, it's gonna be a smaller portion based on market value. Typically securities with lower market values are generating less cash flow. While any CLO, outside of its reinvestment period, as a general rule, you'd expect its cash flows to decay, expect its cash flows to decay from, being outside the reinvestment period. My expectation is that it's relatively light, in terms of the percentage. In our investor deck, and we did publish one this morning, I know it's tough to get through it before everything before the call. We actually show the cash received on, this is on Page 26 of the deck. Let's see, it looks like 25, 26, shows the cash received position by position. Maybe as a follow-up to look into those numbers and look at the cash we received and look how much of it comes from CLOs that are outside the reinvestment period versus those that are in. My expectation is you'd see it's a very different ratio of those that are in versus out. Okay. I'll follow up with Ken on that. Couple more questions, Tom. In the sort of 2015 mini credit cycle, the CLO equity portfolio's mark declined to about 75% of cost, and then it rebounded almost to par in about a year. Same sort of thing happened during the COVID cycle, except it fell to around 50% of cost and then rebounded to par in mid-2021. In the current cycle, it's down to around 75% of cost, which I think may reflect the outlook for cash flows or the uncertainty about the outlook for cash flows. When you think about the Fed potentially ending its monetary tightening, how do you see the market valuing CLO equity going forward? Yeah. There's good question. There's any number of possibilities. You know, on one hand, if, let's say, the Fed were to start cutting rates aggressively, that's not a prediction, just a theoretic, that might suggest the economy's in a lot of trouble, and maybe that, you know, portends for additional defaults. At the same time, if they keep increasing rates, maybe that, you know, portends for companies to have a hard time paying their debt service. Kinda talking negatively both ways there on one hand. The flip side, assuming we're, you know, maybe closer to the top, but not going down too far, maybe we go down a little bit from here. What we see is by and large, you know, we've out of thousands of issuers. What do we Let me just flip back here. We have exposure to 1,872 obligors. In the U.S., 10 of those 10 companies defaulted in the loan market. A teeny% of the count of our obligors, that's a count basis, not a percentage basis. The to frame the actual credit expense occurring, not too bad in the overall scheme of things. Obviously we like zero defaults, but that's improbable. Where we look, the best news out there is by and large the top line and bottom line of below investment grade companies that report publicly, and this is per S&P or LCD data, top line and bottom line are still growing as of the latest data that I've seen. While we always like revenue to grow at 20%, in many cases, it's growing in the high single digits to low-to-mid teens on a year-over-year basis. That gives companies at least some degree of... We can debate why that is. It's inflation, it's this, it's that. Companies are growing in general. These are, you know, in many cases, levered buyouts oriented towards growth. My expectation is companies will, you know, even if 3% default, that means 97% keep paying, first off. An increase in defaults would push prices down, which could, in the near term, hurt CLO equity values in that when... When the market values a piece of CLO equity, it's a combination of looking at the future cash flows and looking at the NAV or what's the liquidation value if we're to just unwind a CLO. When you create a new CLO, it's much more an NPV analysis. When you're at the end of the reinvestment period, it's much more of a liquidation analysis, and the right answer is somewhere in between. Our expectation is over time, CLO values will go back up, and in my opinion, they're depressed more than the risks warrant. The market is the market. It's hard to predict what will happen in, you know, definitively in the coming months. Prices may move up or down. I think a lot of the pain is behind us. But that's my best estimate at this point. I can't say that definitively. What I do know is, just as we saw during COVID, our portfolio had a much lower payment interruption rate than the broader market, and our portfolio was set up with more OC cushion than the broader market and a much longer weighted average reinvestment period than many CLOs on average, which we think will give us the perseverance to continue generating strong cash flows, even if we see defaults pick up. That's really helpful, Tom, and I agree with those sentiments. You mentioned defaults, and I do see that the portfolio's CCC bucket actually declined, which is a very good trend. How do you view the ratings agencies' outlook on leveraged loan defaults today versus, you know, maybe a couple of quarters ago? It just feels like things are not as dire as, you know, we were maybe thinking in the middle of last year going into this year. You know, I'm just curious whether you think the pressure from downgrades is easing. No one's ever got into a credit cycle saying, "Oh, it's not going to be that bad this time." You know, every cycle, "Oh, it's going to be terrible. It's going to be doom and gloom. It's, you know, there's no bottom." At heart here, you know, most of the folks we do business with are credit folks. I agree with your broad sentiment that it's, in my expectation, not going to be as bad as many of the naysayers say. The biggest thing, you know, or a big thing out there, the% of loans trading below 80, in our portfolio, we I gave you that stat. Let me go back and look at it. That is up a little bit. I forget what it was, but we mentioned it earlier. Let's see. Here we go. We have 6.3% of our loans trading below 80. you know, CCC is at 4.4%. that mean, you know, assuming all the there's a 1.9% difference, between those two measures, assuming all the CCCs are trading below 80, that's not necessarily accurate, but let's make that the assumption. There's another 1.9% of loans that are below 80 that are not yet trading at triple rated CCC. Why that is, who knows? I don't. Usually, the market's ahead of the agencies on these things. The, that, the combination of the collage of those two things is really what to look at when trying to measure the potential risk in the portfolio. The offset to that is, what's the payment rate and what's the price of loans? What we saw last year, in general, was significant par build across many of our CLOs. If anything, they may be giving back a little par so far this year, but I'm happy to see them do that as they're trimming tails and trying to minimize risk. Hence, you saw the CCC bucket come down, on aggregate. Again, to talk about that, if our CCC basket is 4.4% and our junior OC cushion is 4.85%, typically in a CLO, there's some haircuts on the numerator of the OC test once CCCs get above 7.5%. Even if we saw in our average CLO, even if we saw CCC double, that wouldn't interrupt, that wouldn't fail the OC test on our, on a typical CLO. Probably even if we saw them triple, holding all else constant, it likely wouldn't trip that junior OC test on the representative average CLO. We've got a ton of cushion in this space. We have, you know, again, we're 4.85% on the junior OC cushion. The broader market's at 3.9%. This is by design how we structure our portfolios to give us more stability during choppy markets. At the extreme, if the tests were to fail. The consequence isn't great, but it's not catastrophic. The consequence is suspending equity distributions at a CLO and redeploying that money to either buy new loans or de-lever your AAAs. Importantly, OC tests only matter four minutes per year. I used to say four days a year, but it's really just four minutes. It's 5:00 P.M. on the quarterly determination date. It's interesting at all times, in my opinion, but the only time it has any economic substance is at 5:00 P.M., the proverbial 5:00 P.M., on the day of determination. Even if you went offsides on that CLO collateral managers then have some runway to get things, you know, some time typically from when downgrades were to get back on side. I agree with your sentiment. The headline are typically always worse than the news and credit. You know, credit people are, you know, are by definition pessimists, which is what we're supposed to be. I think when you see companies growing top line revenue on average the way we're seeing, that's usually not a big harbinger of default. That's, that's really insightful and very helpful, Tom. I appreciate your time this morning. Thank you. Great. Thanks so much, Mickey. As a reminder to star one on your telephone keypad if you would like to ask a question. Our next question is from Paul Johnson with KBW. Please proceed. Yeah, good morning. Thanks for taking my question. I know we discussed this fairly frequently, but, I'm just curious, you know, in terms of how the dynamic, I guess, played out this quarter between, you know, asset repricing on, you know, the loans, the underlying loans in the portfolio versus the liabilities, and whether that was sort of, you know, at play here, I guess this quarter? Just, you know, obviously kind of looking at the income quarter-over-quarter relatively flat, you know, versus the, you know, fairly significant growth you guys had and strong cash flows, this quarter that you know, you mentioned that came in. Any sort of color, I guess, on that relationship and how that generally works for you and maybe how you'd expect that to kind of play out for the year, if possible. Let's see. Let's hit on a few things there. Changes in CLO debt spreads and loan spreads. We'll start there. On loan spreads it's coming up right now, which is good. If we were to go back and find transcripts from our 2018 calls, we would've been lamenting that while defaults were low, loan spreads were getting tighter and tighter. In many cases, loans are trading above par. Companies could come back and refinance at a tighter spread. Today it's the opposite. Companies are refinancing their, you know, 2023 maturities, which might have a hypothetical here, might have a 300 spread, but they wanna get rid of the 2023 or certainly 2023 or even 2024 or 2025 maturity, and they're refinancing at a wider spread. This is not, you know... If you're a treasurer or CFO at a levered borrower, you're sitting there saying, "Well, you know, I don't want this debt, long-term debt to be in the current portion of my balance sheet. The window's open. You know, stinks to have to pay a higher rate and offer some OID as well to these investors, but I'd rather do that than have investors ask me why the long-term debt is due, you know, within a year." It's on one hand, no one would rationally refinance wider. If you're facing a medium term debt maturity, it makes sense to refinance wider just to get yourself some runway. We love that. This is the opposite of what we used to call spread compression. This is spread expansion. We're thrilled to see that. I suspect that trend will continue as companies keep tackling their 2024, 2025, and soon their 2026 maturities. The window's open. It's been a choppy couple of years for in the credit markets. You know, if you can print and extend, you know, I'm spending someone else's money here, but the marginal 100 basis points on part of your debt financing when you're, you know, trying to grow your business 20% top line versus taking the risk off the table of can't refinance later makes a ton of sense. That's great. We hope that trend continues. It feels like it will. CLO debt is unchanged in terms of the spreads. One of the advantages, mindful at EIC, we'll talk the other way about this, but as for ECC, you know, we're basically short the CLO debt at a fixed spread. We have an option typically as the majority investor in the CLO, sort of a protective right to declare and direct a refinancing of the CLO if it makes sense. I think I mentioned our weighted average AAA spread was 119 basis points over LIBOR. The generic kind of AAA level right now in the market's kinda 195. The tights are 175. Our debt is very much in the money. As an equity investor to CLO debt, it's kind of, you know, heads I win, tails you lose. If spreads tighten, we'll refinance you tighter, and if spreads widen, we won't. Whereas maybe 18 months ago it was kinda refi and reset mania here at Eagle Point, I couldn't tell you the last time we did one of those because right now our debt is so in the money. We're fortunate and our maturities are longer than our loans, so we don't have any refinancing need in our CLO portfolio. The good news, loans are shorter, and they're refinancing wider right now. Our spreads are set in stone. That much is good. In terms of earnings power for the company, obviously it's very difficult to forecast earnings. We like to make things as high as possible. That much I can assure you. The pickup in cash flow in April versus the prior quarter or two was driven by just a kind of a natural correction of a basis between one-month and three-month LIBOR or one-month and three-month SOFR. While CLO debt all pays off of three-month rates, LIBOR or SOFR, loans can pay one-month, three-month, six-month, or even off of prime minus typically. It's an oddity in the loan market that the borrower can choose their rate. When rates were moving up very, very quickly and the short end of the yield curve was steep, what folks did was focus on, if you were a corporate treasurer, you know, it was a 25 basis points difference in one-month versus three-month rates, you'd pay the one-month rate. Us CLO guys had to keep paying three-month to our lenders. That caused a little bit of mismatch. As the short end of the yield curve, and again, this is the one-to-three-month yield curve. This has nothing to do with five years, 10 years, you know, or 30-year Treasuries. This is the one-to-three-month portion of the yield curve. As that has kind of normalized and flattened, we're seeing the difference, if you can go to one-month LIBOR, being very modest and more companies, in many cases, going back to three-month LIBOR. That's good. We like more income, not less. How does that translate to earnings? You know, broadly, when we forecast effective yields, it's based on the cash flows on the loans versus the cost of the debt. If we get more cash in than we modeled, which is what happened on many investments in April, that has the effect of pushing down the amortized cost. Let's say we have an investment with a 15% loss adjusted effective yield, and we expected to get a certain amount of cash. If we got a greater amount of cash, that excess is treated as a return of capital in our accounting system, and this is very standard accounting. From there, when we reforecast expected yield for the next quarter, all else equal, and obviously that's a big statement, we have a lower basis from which we're forecasting those cash flows. If the cash flows stay just as we predicted them, but now we have a lower basis, all else equal, the effective yield goes up because we get that same cash off a lower basis. If everything else stays the same and we got that bonus or that normalized, more normalized long-term distribution in April, that would suggest that effective yields could go up prospectively. Obviously, there's a multitude of other things that could impact it, but holding all else constant, that would drive effective yield up, which would therefore likely drive earnings higher. A lot of factors go into that, but that's the broad piece. It's always a good scenario when we're getting more cash flow from our portfolio. Thanks, Tom. Appreciate that. A lot in there. Very helpful answer. Helpful insight as always. Basically just one or two more questions. I mean, on that sort of same topic, what would you say, I guess, in terms of the CLO investor asset class? I guess it's this kind of relationship with rates in general. I mean, as the risk-free rate has gone higher last year. I mean, I understand a lot of the decline in CLO activity this year may be somewhat supply constraint-driven. What would you say, I guess, kind of about the future demand of, you know, the CLO asset class, just with, you know, higher rates in general, you know, and just, you know, the ability obviously, maybe this answer is a little bit different between the CLO debt versus equity investors. You know, does that have any impact on, you know, CLO formation and obviously has an impact on CLO spreads? Just any sort of insight there would also be helpful. Sure. Let me address those. A couple pieces in there. In my opinion, CLO equity investors don't really give two hoots about rates. We've been working with this asset class when, you know, LIBOR was 6%, LIBOR was zero, and kind of everywhere in between. The base case the bankers always show is 14%, give or take. It's not a LIBOR plus type market. In general, in my opinion, people think of CLO equity relative to equity-like returns. Just as, you know, people investing in venture capital today demand a higher return than they did a year ago, people investing in CLO equity in the secondary market are demanding a higher return today. Whereas we might have been putting money in the ground at a 15% loss-adjusted yield a year ago, theoretically, today we're putting money at an 18.5% rate loss adjusted yield, give or take, maybe even higher. We could certainly. Some are over 20%, in fact. We could focus even higher and higher, but we're focused on moving up in quality in general in these markets. It's, it's in CLO equity, the nice thing is the floating rates asset and liabilities, other than that slight mismatch on one-month to three-month, largely cancels itself out. And it's just simply what sort of rate do folks care on. For CLO equity, it's more about a just general risk tolerance than base rates. Very few people think of it as LIBOR plus. Moving over to CLO debt, that becomes more interesting. You know, CLO BBs were as little as 500 over, not, you know, 5 years ago, give or take, when base rates were close to zero. All of a sudden, you know, CLO debt or CLO BBs might have been a, you know, 5.5% investment. You can get Treasuries nearly at 5.5% today. That, that's obviously changed. When you look at CLO BBs with a, you know, on a spot rate of 5%, often trading at 8.5%, you know, with a spread of 850 or DM of 850. All of a sudden, you're looking at kind of a 13%-14% current yield on those, and many of those bonds are trading in the 80s. When we quote these DMs or discount margins, that's on a yield to worst or DM to worst basis, assuming the CLOs never get called. Kinda when we look at CLO BB today, we kind of view assuming the bonds pay off and you underwrite them well, your downside to maturities in the 13-14 range. But if you've got 10-20 points of convexity on your bond, if spreads normalize and spreads tighten or that CLO gets called sooner, all of a sudden you could be looking at a 20% return opportunity as well. So that's a, that's a pretty interesting investment as well. Even at CLO AAAs, broadly, they're at SOFR plus 200 today, give or take 195. That's about a 7% return investment. That's, in my opinion, a very attractive investment unto itself for an asset that's never had a credit loss in the history, you know, the nearly 30-year history of the asset class. That's pretty attractive. In terms of CLO formation, the real challenge, in my opinion, is the gap between CLO AAA spreads and loan spreads is out of whack right now. CLO, you have AAA guys, if they're demanding 195 over on average, and then the rest of the stack commensurately wider, that just pencils to a typically too low yield for CLO equity, in my opinion. If we're able to buy high-quality paper at 18 and change in the secondary market, in many cases, new issue CLOs pencil out to around 10% today. There's about an 800 basis point difference or greater, secondary versus primary. The big challenge in the market is that there's not enough CLO AAA investors, in my opinion. It's a great investment. Now you could have a different view on rates. Maybe you think rates are coming down, in which case you'd be better off buying fixed rate than floating rate. Here you're just able, with CLO debt, you're able to take rate duration off the table. The largest constraint to CLO formation, in my opinion, is the availability of AAA capital. Indeed, of the CLOs that were issued, there were $34 billion in the first quarter. In our opinion, based on a review of the issuances, the vast majority of those were taken by captive CLO funds, where the collateral manager is the one who decides when the equity invests, not a profit-motivated third-party investor like ourselves. Why in the world you would buy a new investment from a collateral manager at 10 when you can get the same thing in the secondary market at 18% yields is beyond me. Those exist. Indeed, a fair number of, we believe the majority of the volume in the first quarter was driven by those captive funds. We get a couple more AAA investors on, we get some more normalization, I think we'd see a pickup in issuance. For ECC, what we see is there's a ton of opportunity in the secondary market. April saw over $500 million of notional, maybe even close to $1 billion, I forget the number, it was so big, of CLO equity available on BWIC in the secondary market. Not all of that traded, and obviously, it trades at less than par, but still measured in the hundreds of millions of dollars of investment opportunity. We, we like that, and 90% of our focus right now is in that market. Thanks again, Tom. appreciate the answers, and, that's all for me. Great. Thanks. Long answer. Appreciate your time, Paul. That concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the call back over to Tom for closing comments. Great. Thanks so much, everyone, for joining our call today. Ken and I appreciate your time and interest in Eagle Point Credit Company. If you have any follow-up questions, we'll be available later today to speak. Thank you very much. Thank you. This does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect at this time. Thank you for your participation.