Good ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to EMCORE's Q2 2022 earnings call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Tom Minichiello. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to our conference call to discuss EMCORE's fiscal 2022 Q2 results. The news release we issued this afternoon is posted on our website, emcore.com. On this call, Jeff Ritticher, EMCORE's President and Chief Executive Officer, will begin with the discussion of our business highlights. I will then update you on our financial results, and we'll conclude by taking questions. Before we begin, we would like to remind you that the information provided herein may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements are largely based on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends affecting the business. Such forward-looking statements include, in particular, projections about future results, statements about plans, strategies, business prospects, and changes and trends in the business and the markets in which we operate. Management cautions that these forward-looking statements relate to future events or future financial performance and are subject to business, economic, and other risks and uncertainties, both known and unknown, that may cause actual results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements of the business or in our industry to be materially different from those expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. We caution you not to rely on these statements and to also consider the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and the business, which are included in the company's filings available on the SEC's website located at sec.gov, including the sections entitled Risk Factors in the company's annual report on Form 10-K. The company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements to conform such statements to actual results or to changes in our expectations, except as required by applicable law or regulation. In addition, references will be made during this call to non-GAAP financial measures, which we believe provide meaningful supplemental information to both management and investors. The non-GAAP measures reflect the company's core ongoing operating performance and facilitates comparisons across reporting periods. Investors are encouraged to review these non-GAAP measures as well as the explanation and reconciliation of these measures to the most comparable GAAP measures included in our news release. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Jeff. Thank you, Tom, and good afternoon, everyone. EMCORE's fiscal Q2 revenue was $32.7 million, roughly at the consensus midpoint for revenue, but down about 23% over Q1. Non-GAAP operating loss was $738,000, and adjusted EBITDA was positive $270,000. Semiconductor and supply chain challenges affected our gross margin significantly, bringing it down to 30%. On a brighter note, cash on the balance sheet continued to grow, increasing by almost $5 million. Semiconductor availability was a difficult problem in the quarter and costs were up across the board. Microcontrollers and FPGAs were particularly problematic, experiencing substantial price increases. Other unpredictable logistics challenges that we saw in Q1 remained with us in Q2, causing some surprise pushouts of material that we expected. Those problems are likely to persist going forward, and we don't see a catalyst to drive predictability into the supply chain in the short- term. Some components have lead time stretched to over 90 weeks. The shutdown of all of our remaining manufacturing operations in China was completed on schedule within Q2. Subsequently, all of the remaining cable television manufacturing equipment was shipped to our EMS partner. This is one of the principal reasons for the strong improvement in working capital. We reduced CATV inventory and going forward, we will get billed on the same day that we bill our customers. We're expecting the manufacturing facility to be returned to the landlord within Q3, leaving a very small group in China to support EMS and certain engineering tasks. Beyond the manufacturing transition, which is now complete, cable TV contributed to expected levels of performance within the broadband unit in Q2. Beyond the cable TV operation, the chips business received an additional development contract with its own NRE funding. As we stated last quarter, pre-production volumes of the shipments of these first products are expected to begin this quarter, with low volumes of product from a second customer planned for the September quarter. As it stands today, these new products should have a significant impact on fab absorption within the first half of calendar year 2023. Beyond that point, they are expected to be margin accretive to the broadband business, ultimately contributing tens of millions in revenue by 2025. It is important to note that fab utilization from these new products is expected to drive the majority of wafer fab production, pushing cable TV requirements into the minority of wafer starts, stabilizing costs, and ultimately improving gross margins in the broadband business. Aerospace and defense experienced a customer-specific air pocket in orders that drove revenue down by approximately 10%. Since quarter end, most of those issues related to new compliance procedures at the customer have been resolved, and only one remaining order is expected this week. QMEMS's revenue rebounded by 24% with improving yields, partially offsetting the impact of delayed orders for FOG and defense optoelectronics. On a related note, we've recently fielded questions from investors about how the war in Ukraine affects EMCORE's A&D business. The short answer is it really hasn't. Weapons such as the Javelin use infrared seekers, not inertial navigation, to find their targets. Our business developments in aerospace and defense have generated significant momentum. We gained important new contracts in QMEMS and added the L3Harris Space and Navigation business to EMCORE in a transaction which closed last Friday on April 29th. We announced two important contracts for QMEMS product today and received a third contract this morning. The first was a $21 million agreement to expand our relationship with Gyrodata, a world leader in directional drilling systems for oil and gas applications. This agreement can significantly increase the volume of business that we do with Gyrodata. We also announced our first contract for precision-guided munitions for PGM applications for an important international customer. PGMs are the largest market segments for inertial measurement systems and are expected to be an area of significant growth for EMCORE in FY 2023. We continue to test and validate our SDI170 with defense contractors worldwide. We have been advised that their annual volumes target ranges from 1,000-4,000 units per year with a total value of about $30 million per year. Finally, we received a $5 million contract this morning to provide critical components to upgrade the flight control systems of one of our frontline fighter aircraft. Collectively, these contracts demonstrate the growing momentum for our QMEMS navigation products and future growth beginning this year. The acquisition of L3Harris' space and navigation business also brought significant opportunities to EMCORE. We've received letter subcontracts authorizing EMCORE to proceed on both the BoRG and TAIMU programs. BoRG means, or stands for Booster Rate Gyro, which will be used in the United Launch Alliance first stage control system. Through our space and navigation business, EMCORE will produce BoRG IMUs for the United Launch Alliance Atlas and Centaur programs. This is the first of several expected orders for BoRG. TAIMU, or Tri-Axial IMU, will be an integral part of the guidance system for the ULA Centaur and Atlas launch vehicles. The flight control system employs three true navigation-grade IMUs to guide each spacecraft. Over the next year and a half, EMCORE will complete the design and qualification of TAIMU IMUs and start delivering them for launch in early 2024. Now I will move on to guidance for the fiscal Q3. Although we are feeling the same headwinds and semiconductor and supply chain problems as everyone else in the technology business, we are expecting a solid rebound in A&D revenue in Q3. On the cable TV side, excess transmitter will remain a major challenge, forcing us to reduce our guidance range for June quarter to $25 million-$27 million, which includes $3.5 million in revenue from our new acquisition. Cyclicality has been a frustrating part of cable television for the 20 years that I've been involved with it. With that said, we began work nearly seven years ago to meet the challenge of this cyclicality and expected changes in the market. We've divested the assets and inventory in cable TV and returned those assets to cash. We've developed a chip business that is now bearing fruit and have taken down our headcount substantially in cable television. The company has a strong balance sheet and a growing order book for our inertial navigation products. In summary, the future of EMCORE is bright despite the near-term frustration of the current cable TV down cycle. With that, I will turn the call back over to Tom. Thank you, Jeff. Consolidated revenue for fiscal Q2 was $32.7 million within our previously stated guidance range for the quarter. Broadband revenue was $23.6 million, an $8.7 million decrease when compared to fiscal Q1. $7.5 million of the sequential quarter revenue change was attributable to our cable TV products, which, as indicated during our last call, was impacted by transmitter inventory tied up in the channel at one MSO. The remainder of the decline was due to lower sales of our chip-level sensing products, which are largely tied to a single customer for the China rail project, and therefore can be lumpy from quarter to quarter. Aerospace and defense segment revenue is $9 million, a $900,000 decrease when compared to the prior quarter. While revenue performance for our QMEMS product line improved this quarter, our FOG revenue is down due to a delay of a customer order for our single-axis gyro. In addition, defense optoelectronics revenue was sequentially lower, primarily due to program delays and supply chain disruptions. Let me now turn to the rest of the operating results, the focus of which will be on a non-GAAP basis. Consolidated gross margin was 30% in fiscal Q2 compared to 38% the quarter before. Broadband's gross margin at 35% decreased on a sequential quarter basis due to the lower revenue, higher material costs, and under absorption of fixed overhead costs in the Alhambra wafer fab, as well as at our China facility for part of the quarter. On the A&D side, QMEMS's gross margins improved sequentially due primarily to higher volume and improving yields. However, this was more than offset by the decreased margins for FOG and defense optoelectronics, both largely due to the lower revenue. Operating expenses were $10.4 million in fiscal Q2, slightly better than the $10.6 million in the prior quarter. Quarterly OpEx has remained consistent over the past four quarters and has averaged $10.3 million over that time period. Moving to the bottom line, the changes in our revenue levels and gross margin in fiscal Q2 resulted in an operating loss of $738,000. Adjusted EBITDA was positive $270,000. Net loss was $750,000 or $0.02 per share. Shifting for a moment to the GAAP results, fiscal Q2 net loss was $2.2 million or $0.06 per share. This included several items associated with the transition of our cable TV operations to our third-party manufacturer, Fastrain, notably $432,000 of shutdown costs and a $788,000 gain on the sale of transmitter equipment to Fastrain. The GAAP results also included $456,000 of expenses associated with the space and navigation acquisition. Turning to the balance sheet, we had cash of $80.9 million at March 31st, compared to $76 million at December 31st. The $4.9 million increase consisted of $5.3 million of operating cash flow and $1.1 million in proceeds from the sale of equipment, less $1.4 million used for CapEx and $100,000 related to financing activities. On a trailing 12-month basis, EMCORE has generated $22 million in cash from operations. Before we get to Q&A, I'd like to share with everyone that both Jeff and I plan to be available for virtual meetings on June 1st at the Craig-Hallum Institutional Investor Conference and for in-person meetings in New York City on June 2nd at the Cowen TMT Conference. We plan on providing further details prior to each event. With that, we will now open up the call for your questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you'd like to ask a question, you may do so by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off so the signal can be read by our equipment. Star one for questions. We'll pause a moment to assemble the phone queue. Star one for questions or comments, please. Star one. We'll take our first question from Richard Shannon with Craig-Hallum. Please go ahead. Well, hi, Jeff and Tom. Thanks for taking my questions here. Let's see here. Let's get one question looking backwards here, gross margins are obviously disappointing to you and I think the Street as well here. Maybe you can help us understand some of the dynamics here in supply chain that are driving this. I know, Jeff, you said in your prepared remarks you don't have good visibility on when they return. Maybe you can give us a sense of how sustainable those problems are and if there's anything that's under your control that you can do to help that. There's really two a little bit different sets of issues. Cable TV was strictly a pricing issue. We were able to get a hold of everything that we needed to complete the transmitter builds. The problem was that you take orders for transmitters a year ago roughly. You don't get the opportunity to renegotiate prices with the customer when t hings change in the supply chain. Normally, you see the cost of the discretes in particular the microcontrollers have grown substantially in some cases several hundred%. It was strictly a price issue and we were able to get what we needed in the market. That had the majority of the impact on cable TV margins was simply purchased material. As the mix in the business changes away from transmitters, meaning cable TV, we'll expect to see that problem abate quite a bit, because it's going to be module centric, laser module centric for a number of quarters. As that happens, you're just not as sensitive to the semiconductor prices because the modules don't have much of that in there at all. Over on the A&D side, it's a little bit different. This is where cost, supply chain or just lack of availability causes issues. The principal problem is the techniques you employ over on the commercial side of the business to break what's called availability problems, going to brokers, finding customers that may have excess inventory, they don't work, and it's because of the flow downs in requirements we have for these government contracts for counterfeit protection on parts. It's impractical to pay $50,000-$70,000 to test a lot of chips for a relatively low volume application. I can give you one particular example. It's just astonishing to me that for a part needed for the STARS program that cost us $14 just 18 months ago. Registered and authorized distributors were charging $2,000 a piece for. T hat's just the market that we live in. Where I see the semiconductor availability trajectory is some improvement toward the latter half of 2023 b ut I think it'll be with us to 2024, and it's simply because not only are, call it availability of new chip plants an issue, but demand continues to grow for a lot of these semiconductors. I just see semiconductor costs as an issue. I will tell you that we are now renegotiating prices b ut when you talk about these long orders that were taken a long time ago, especially in cable TV, the customer's reaction would be, "Y ou want to renegotiate price? Well, why don't we just cancel?" I t's just a better business decision to sell at a reduced margin and take the business off the table rather than give it to a competitor potentially or see it go away altogether. The rest of supply chain problems are really a hodgepodge of things. T here's continued transportation problems. We nearly had 7,000 transmitters that didn't get on a boat out of Thailand simply because there wasn't room. I wish I could tell you that it's any one thing in the supply chain, but it's a combination of everything. T he problem is that having 99% of the parts when you try to put something together is not good enough. Y ou tend to be limited by things that have never been problems in the past. People assure you that they're going to ship on time, and then they don't. It's not like there's a lot of recourse, especially when you've got only one or two qualified suppliers for something. You just take it on the chin. Y ou look at Apple, you look at even Raytheon was talking about lack of availability of components affecting their missile business, and everybody's struggling with this. No doubt. Appreciate all that detail, Jeff. Thank you for that. Next topic I want to touch on here is in cable. A two-part question here. You talked about an inventory burn going on here, and you talked about it being largely at one MSO. Is it still just one MSO, or is it bleeding into the second one at all? Do you see any visibility on when this, the inventory will be gone? Is the other MSO or MSOs still ordering? How do we think about the the levels you're expecting for cable in the June quarter as I try to fit the guidance together here? It seems like we're going to be down at levels that we might have seen starting in 2019 and before an average... Two years ago. Over a period of years. Hey, Richard, I'll tell you exactly what it's going to be. It's going to look like June quarter in 2019. 6.9? For cable. S omewhere right in there. 6.9. Got it. Go ahead. Just repeating my question about the dynamics here with inventory and whether there's more of a problem with more than one MSO here. I think there's really nothing that I would change in terms of my comments. I will say that the inventory situation that everybody has is causing a lot more fluidity than you'd expect. For example, there have been a lot of comments about the growth in Remote PHY, which we always saw as inevitable. It's just that it happens seven years later than everybody else was saying, and we were able to make a lot of money in the process. The challenge is that some of the same semiconductor shortage issues that are plaguing everything else are particularly difficult for products over in that market. Does that mean then that some manufacturer or MSOs will elect to do a bit more over on the Hybrid Fiber Coax side? Yes, it's possible. There 's a lot of things going on underneath the waterline that, candidly are conflicting pieces of information. There's really nothing that I would add and say, "Okay, clearly, here's what things are going on," We've got a backlog of modules and as we look at the replenishment cycles for that, probably by the next call, we're going to update everyone if anything changes. Okay. Fair enough. That's helpful. Maybe two last quick questions. I'll jump on the line here. I had a couple of contract- Sure. Announcements, plus a couple of the ones I think you mentioned on the prepared remarks here. One of them looks kind of interesting is the SDI170 and the precision-guided munition, excuse me. This sounds like maybe a substantial or important piece of this opportunity to run revenues up to $30 million per year. Maybe if you can give context within that, and then any dynamics here about timing, and customer and anything else on that. The SDI170 has been thoroughly tested by government and leading OEMs over the past year. We haven't had a single failure in testing, either flight testing with rotary aircraft, helicopters. What we've got now is the beginning of traction for low volume production orders. T hese guys are pretty careful. We expect the first order to go out largely in the June quarter, and then within a couple of months, we're expecting to see some significantly larger orders. It is a very important part of this. At peak, t he JDAM program, Honeywell was selling a half a billion dollars' worth of IMUs a year to Boeing. Now what you've got is an international market that is adding their own smart bomb capability, meaning inertial NAV-based products into their own weapons programs, and those are the ones that we're getting designed into first. Yes, it's important. The first PGM program is a big deal, and there's a lot more volume to be expected, and it's going to move the needle. Okay. I look forward to hearing more about that, and I'll ask some more questions offline on that one. Sure. My last question for Tom is, just want to get a sense of how we're expecting the financials to look here, probably more importantly, on a pro forma basis, with the new L3Harris addition here, particularly on gross margins and OpEx. Wondering if you can give us any thoughts on how to model for this. Richard, it's going to be a little tricky because this particular business was part of the greater L3Harris. The way they did their accounting and where a lot of the services that were performed financially and administratively were really outside of the Budd Lake operation. We're inheriting a model and a method that mirrors government contract accounting, where just about everything that they spend on is included in the project cost, which would translate to cost of goods sold, b ut the best way to think about it is the recent run rate is producing about a 10% profit on $5 million-$6 million in quarterly revenue. Hence our guidance, which includes two months of the three months of the full June quarter at around $3.5 million. If you think about it that way, then it becomes a question of what's OpEx and what's margin. Right now, the majority of that is in margin. It produces a much lower gross margin rate, almost closer to its operating margin, b ut once we get through the accounting and how we're going to do it going forward, that could change. C all it around maybe half a million more in OpEx and somewhere in the 15%-20% gross margin, b ut bear in mind, it's still producing a profit at those revenue levels. Okay. Just a quick follow-up. Does this include the fixed costs of the overbearing lease that you hope to get out of either ahead of time or once it sunsets, I think, next year? Yes, it does. Okay. That's all the questions. Richard, w ell, just a quick add on. Remember, most things over in that side of the world were all done cost-plus. Just because you had an outrageous lease, didn't mean you couldn't get paid for it. Okay. Fair enough. I will jump on the line, guys. Thank you. Thank you. Thanks. As a reminder, star one for questions or comments. Star one, please. We'll pause a moment to assemble a queue. We'll take a follow-up with Richard Shannon with Craig-Hallum. Please go ahead. All right. Well, I guess I didn't have to get out of line here. Listen, Jeff, maybe just one question here. The Indium Phosphide chip opportunity, I think is a very interesting one, and it sounds like you're making some good progress. If I caught your prepared comments right, you won another. I don't know if we call it a contract or a development agreement or something, but maybe you can help us understand what's going on there, when you see the NRE, what application it's in, and how is the size of the opportunity relative to some of those you've already signed? Yes. The application for all of this stuff is going to be data center-based. I can't tell you exactly what type of chip it is because we've got some competition-sensitive information in there. I will tell you that, w ell, there are what's called a group of these customers that are asking for similar but different enough things that the design has to change a little bit. There is a growing interest in LIDAR as well, but that wasn't the agreement that was recently signed. These are not commodity chips. W hen you talk about things like GPON or even 10 GPON, you're talking about devices that are anywhere between, I don't know, a few tens of cents, $0.30-$0.35 up to maybe $1. These are devices that start at $20 and go up from there. I f I could tell you who the customers were, you'd call them Tier 1s. W e're real excited about it. T he thing is, we had another question from an investor like, "Well, why don't you just go fill the fab?" T his is not like McDonald's is reintroducing the McRib, and you put it on the menu, and people start walking through the door. There's a lot of work to do the development, and then you've got qualification, which ranges anywhere between 5,000 and 12,000 hours, depending on the customer requirements. Obviously, to get to the point where we're shipping small pre-production volumes, we've been through that now. We've actually been through it a couple of times. T here's real serious milestones that are behind what we're doing. The other point that I made earlier in my prepared comments was I started talking about the impact on fab absorption. The way to think about this is that the fab cost is roughly $2 million a quarter. Cable TV takes up a piece, NAV does other parts of the business do. What you're left with is $1 million plus or minus the cable TV needs to buy essentially from the fab. The implication of that, let's just keep the math simple, call it a million. At 50% margin, it implies that once you're shipping $2 million a quarter worth of devices, you are effectively paying for the fab with or without cable television. We expect to be at that point certainly within a year from now. What you're going to see is a declining amount of fab under absorption. Then once we get to the point where we're shipping $2 million a quarter worth of devices, which won't take us too long, then i t starts to turn margin accretive. Does that make sense, Richard? Yes, it does make sense. I think even I can do that math. Thanks for that, Jeff. You're welcome. You did make one interesting comment about just open up the fab and expect business to come in the door and you said these are serious milestones. What I found was r eally interesting there is that you got some customers coming in for very similar applications. Yes. The one you talked about here was data center. My first question is, what other options do these guys have to go with, and why are they coming to EMCORE? Without revealing too much, what I can tell you is, we are one of a very few Indium Phosphide fabs in the world capable of building these advanced devices that is also not selling a competing product. For example, if someone wanted to go buy, say, a group of 800 lasers for 800G transceivers, y ou're not going to have and this is not what we're making, by the way. If you're selling those transceivers, and you own the fab, are you going to sell them the raw die? Of course not. No. We don't have that strategic conflict. We're not producing finished components for the data center market, and b ecause of that, customers are coming to us. Maybe they want to roll their own components. Maybe they've got other ideas. That's about as far as I can go. Okay. That's fair enough, and that's good perspective. I think that's enough for me, guys. Thank you much. I'll jump out of line again. T hank you, Richard. Thanks, Richard. We'll take our next question from Jared Jungjohann with Cowen and Company. Please go ahead. Hi, Jeff and Tom. This is, Jared on for Paul Silverstein. I was curious if you guys could give us an update on the M&A environment surrounding smaller A&D companies. Do you guys see any opportunities for another small tuck-in deal? Yes, we do. Period. End of story. I'm not trying to be curt. It's just that I believe we mentioned this before possibly before you started in Paul's shop, Jared, is t hat the L3Harris thing which we view as we got a terrific bargain would not be the last deal that we did. We just got to find the right one, and there are some candidates. Okay, I'm guessing you guys can't provide any color as to timeline or anything of that sort? I wish I could. S ometimes these things go quicker than you expect. Other times, they take longer. T hat kind of speculation I don't think is going to help at this point. Understood. Thank you very much. Yes. Well, that's it for me. I appreciate the answer. You're welcome, Jared. Star one for questions. We'll pause a moment. Star one for questions, please. Star one. Thank you. I'd like to thank all of you who joined us on the call for your interest in EMCORE. Additionally, I want to welcome the former L3Harris Space and Navigation team to the company, and I'm confident that we're going to have a meaningful impact going forward. Please stay safe, everyone, and goodbye for now. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. We appreciate your participation. You may now disconnect.