Good day, and welcome to the Emerson second quarter 2021 earnings conference call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone, and to withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Pete Lilly, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir. Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Emerson's second quarter earnings and conference call. Today, I'm joined by President and Chief Executive Officer, Lal Karsanbhai, Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Frank Dellaquila, and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Ram Krishnan. I encourage you to follow along the discussion with the accompanying slide presentation, which is available on our website. Please join me on slide two. As always, this presentation may include some forward-looking statements which contain a degree of business risk and uncertainty. Turning to slide three, I'd like to briefly highlight that Emerson has been publishing a corporate social responsibility report for many years now. We have renamed the report the Emerson Environmental, Social, and Governance Report and are excited to highlight all of the goals, momentum, and global standards that our organization is working towards. In particular, our environmental sustainability framework, greening of Emerson, by Emerson, and with Emerson, captures our internal sustainability efforts, our enablement of our customer sustainability journeys through our products and solutions, and our collaboration efforts with various sustainability stakeholders. I encourage you to review the document next month when it is published. As always, I'm available for questions. Please turn to slide four. I'd like to briefly mention our recent Emerson Exchange virtual series, which took place from November through March. Emerson Exchange is a chance for our customer base to interact with other users, industry experts, and Emerson technology leaders. Despite the obvious in-person limitations of the pandemic, Emerson had a tremendously successful virtual engagement with customers focusing on digital transformation, sustainability, technology, and many other topics. This virtual framework dramatically expanded the reach of this already very popular user event. Due to the success of the hybrid format, we will likely be adopting such a format going forward. More details to follow as the time and place for the next Emerson Exchange event is finalized. Please turn to slide five. I will now turn the call over to Lal Karsanbhai for opening remarks. Over to you, Lal. Thank you, Pete. Good morning, everyone. I would like to say a few things before passing it on to Frank. Firstly, to our global team, three things. Thank you for a tremendous quarter. This was one that was delivered based on strong execution, which required agility and creativity as we jumped over a number of hurdles over the last three months. The result was top-class profit leverage over 40% across our operations. Well done by everyone. Momentum is building, and it's more broadly today and across a large number of our markets than it was three months ago. This expansion across both platforms now, as the cycle expands, will enable us to make critical technology investments, building on our strong differentiation and customer relevance. Lastly, to the teams, thank you for welcoming me during my first 90 days, and thank you for your energy and passion. You energize me every day in the journey and on the journey that we're taking together. Secondly, I would like to recognize David Farr, whose board service concluded today after more than 20 years. Thank you, David, for your many contributions. Last but not least, I would like to extend a warm welcome to James Turley, elected by the board of directors yesterday to be Emerson's new Non-Executive Chair. Jim is a highly qualified independent director who's extremely passionate about people, culture, and the future of Emerson. I look forward to working alongside Jim and our entire board. Frank, over to you. Thank you, Lal. Good morning, everybody, and thank you for joining us today. We had a strong quarter, and I'd like to take you through the highlights of that over the next several slides. The strengthening recovery that Lal referred to in most of our end markets, combined with the benefits from our cost reset actions, drove strong operating performance and strong financial results in the second quarter. Adjusted EPS for the quarter was $0.97, ahead of our guidance midpoint of $0.89 and representing 9% growth versus the prior year. Demand strengthened significantly with sales ahead of expectations at 2% underlying growth, and March orders toward the high end of expectations at 4% underlying growth. Within that growth number for the orders, significantly, Automation Solutions continues its steady improvement in both orders and sales, while Commercial and Residential Solutions continues to experience robust demand across all its lines of business and in all geographies, with 11% sales growth and 21% orders growth for the trailing three months through March. The cost reset benefits for the program that we implemented almost two years ago are being realized as planned. Driving adjusted segment EBIT growth of 15% and 150 basis points of increased margin to 19.1%. Additionally, cash flow continues to be strong, up 37% year-over-year, with free cash flow up nearly 50%. This represents 125% conversion of net earnings. We continue to execute on the remaining elements of our cost reset actions, with the bulk of it behind us at this point. We initiated $21 million of additional restructuring in the quarter. Please turn to the next slide, if you would, for comments on the EPS. The EPS bridge operational performance was very strong in the quarter, adding $0.14 to adjusted EPS. As we guided in February, stock compensation was a significant headwind in the quarter due to the mark-to-market impact, which was caused by the difference in the share price at the end of last year's second quarter and this year's second quarter. Of course, you'll recall that last year's share prices, in general, were all severely depressed with the onset of COVID, and we closed last year's second quarter at $48 versus $90 this year. That headwind was within $0.01 of the guidance that we gave you in February. Tax currency and other miscellaneous items netted to about $0.04 of tailwind and a small impact from share repurchase. In total, again, adjusted EPS was $0.97 versus the guide of $0.89. Please go to the next slide for comments on the P&L. As I mentioned, underlying sales growth exceeded expectations at 2%, and it was 6% on a reported basis, including acquisitions and currency. Gross profit slipped just a bit, 10 basis points, mainly due to business mix, given the growth in our Commercial & Residential Solutions business. SG&A increased by 10 basis points, but the real story here is that excluding the stock compensation impact, operationally, it was down 220 basis points, indicative of the magnitude of the cost reduction activity and the flow-through benefits. We had very strong leverage on SG&A, and the spend was actually down year-over-year when you exclude the impact of the stock comp. Adjusted EBIT margin was 18.2%. Our effective tax rate was within a point of last year. Share count at 603 million. Again, adjusted EPS at $0.97. If you please turn to the next slide, we'll talk about earnings and cash flow. Adjusted segment EBIT increased 15%, with the margin increasing 150 basis points to 19.1%, as I said earlier. Leverage on the volume and cost reset benefits offset the material cost headwinds that we did see in the quarter. Again, stock comp was nearly $100 million headwind. It was partially offset by some other corporate items. Adjusted pre-tax earnings were down 20 basis points to 17.3%, again, as the impact of the mark to market on the stock comp flows through. Operating cash flow was very strong, almost a record again at $807 million, up 37%. Free cash flow at $707 million was up 48%, driven by the strong earnings and favorable balance sheet items. Lastly, trade working capital was down to 16.8% of sales as the impact and the distortions from the COVID-related volume decline are beginning to normalize and as the businesses do a good job managing inventory as we return to growth. Please turn to the next slide. We'll go through Automation Solutions. Orders continued to turn upward here. We were at -5% on a trailing three-month basis, making good progress, and we're on the trajectory that we have been mapping out for several months. Underlying sales were above expectations at -2%, and we're encouraged to see the continued sequential improvement in order rates underpinning the sales. China was very strong, and they were favorable comps, but also due to good strength in discrete chemical and energy markets. Our demand in North America improved sequentially, but it did lag other world areas. However, there are noteworthy pockets of growth, very encouraging signs in both discrete life science, food and beverage, and power generation. Importantly, we also continued to see increasing KOB3 activity across our process automation customer base, driven by increased STOs and focused spend on OpEx and productivity. Margin in the platform increased 180 basis points at adjusted EBIT, 230 basis points at adjusted EBITDA, driven by the cost reset savings. The OSI integration continues to go well. The expected synergies are being realized, and we are increasingly encouraged in validating the case that we made for the acquisition when we did it last October. Backlog is roughly flat sequentially at $5.3 billion, but it is up 14% year to date. Please turn to the next slide and we'll review Commercial & Residential Solutions. The story here is very strong growth. Orders continue to strengthen with the March underlying trailing three-month rate at 21%. The demand is primarily driven by ongoing strength in residential end markets, but significantly, cold chain, professional tools, and other commercial industrial markets are also picking up and contributing to the growth. All businesses in all regions were positive, indicative of the trend. Strong growth in China, over 50%, was attributable to commercial HVAC and cold chain demand, in addition to the favorable comp. Europe grew 9% on the strength of continued demand for heat pumps and other energy-efficient, sustainable solutions. Margins improved 40 basis points at the adjusted EBIT level. Cost reduction benefits were somewhat offset by price cost headwinds, which we'll discuss a little more when we cover the guidance. Commercial & Residential backlog has increased almost 60% year to date to about $1 billion. This is about $400 million above what we would consider normal for this business. Operations are working through the significant challenges to meet strong customer demand across most of the businesses in this platform. Please go to the next slide and we'll talk about the updated guidance for the year. Based on the strength we see in orders, the increasing pace of business, we are very encouraged, and we are improving our sales outlook for the year. We now expect underlying sales in the range of 3%-6% overall, with Automation Solutions roughly flat and Commercial & Residential Solutions up in the 12%-14% range. The stronger volume will drive improved profitability. We now expect 17.5% adjusted EBIT margin for the entire enterprise. Cash flow is also projected higher at $3.3 billion operating cash flow and $2.7 billion of free cash flow, an increase of $150 million. Our tax, capital spending, dividend, share repurchase assumptions remain as they were. We're raising adjusted EPS guidance by $0.20 at the midpoint from $3.70- $3.90, and we're tightening the range to ±$0.05 from ±$0.10. We're doing this, increasing the guidance in the face of additional headwinds to profitability because we're very encouraged by the underlying strength of the business and the read-through of the cost reset actions that the business has been working very diligently now for almost two years. The additional headwinds you can see in the margin there on the right of the slide, mainly $50 million more of unfavorable price cost driven by continuing increases in raw materials cost and about another $20 million of stock comp expense versus what we estimated back in February. The speed and the magnitude of the price increases in key inputs, steel, copper, plastic resins, is unprecedented. Operations are actively and effectively working to mitigate the margin impact through selected price and cost containment actions, and the good work that they're doing gives us the confidence to raise the guidance despite these increased headwinds. On the plus side, we expect to retain about $10 million more in the year of the COVID related savings than we previously estimated as basic activity like travel and everything that goes with it comes back in more slowly than we would have thought a couple of months ago. Could you please go to the next slide? We'll do an update on orders. As I mentioned earlier, our underlying trailing three-month orders turned positive in the month of March at 4%. This is consistent with the upper range of the guidance that we provided to you in February. It's driven by ongoing strength in Commercial & Residential Solutions, as you can see, at 21%, and continued significant improvement in Automation Solutions as our global markets recover. Increasingly we see improvement in our traditional process industries as well in North America. We expect general demand to remain strong for the balance of the year. We expect the Automation Solutions markets to accelerate through the second half, and the Commercial & Residential Solutions HVAC demand will taper off somewhat later in the year, but we would expect to see some of the other end markets, commercial, professional tools, and such, recover to partially offset that tapering off in Commercial & Residential Solutions. All in all, we believe we have a good outlook for the second half of the year. If you'd please go to the next slide for the underlying sales growth outlook. Based on what we see and the pace of the improvement in orders for the second half, we see growth in the high single digits range at about 7%-11%, and that will drive the full year growth of 3%-6%. We expect net sales to be just a bit above $18 billion. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Lal, who's going to talk about our business and end market outlook in more detail. Thank you, Frank. I'll just cover a few charts here with the group. Again, increased momentum. Turning to chart 15 here. First on Automation Solutions. We were led through the recovery in the first half by our discrete and early cycle businesses within the platform. Essentially what's occurred as we've navigated through the second quarter is a broader recovery in the mid-cycle elements of this platform. We see a return to growth in Q3, which is very positive after five down quarters in this business, and a continued demand in short cycle as well as that acceleration in the core process automation markets in the back half of the year, yielding a 4-8 range in the second half and a flat year guidance on sales. If we turn to page 16, I'll give you some color on what's going on in the world areas. Perhaps before I do that, though, I'll just paint it from a KOB perspective. KOB- 3 has been incredibly strong both in our discrete spaces, but more interestingly as we navigated the second quarter into our process spaces. Frank referenced shutdown turnaround activity, which is up mid double teens for the year. The STO schedules are holding in full, honestly, as we go into the summer, into the fall season, which is very encouraging. The site walk downs are up almost 50% year-over-year, also very encouraging. Of course, the long-term service agreements are up almost 40% across the world in the business. Very encouraging to see and really provides the feel for the underlying activity we're seeing in the process space. On a KOB-1 basis, things are not completely stopped. There's less activity. Obviously, we digested a significant LNG wave, but there's more activity on the horizon. We've entered the FEED stage on two very important projects, the Baltic LNG and the Golden Island BASF Zhanjiang Verbund site in China. Those are important opportunities for us in automation. Secondly, we were awarded the Sempra Costa Azul LNG project on the Pacific Coast in the Baja Peninsula of Mexico, which has a significant value for us and was awarded and will be booked here in the third quarter. There is some activity. We continue to engage on the KOB-1, and as that starts to loosen up a little bit, I think we're very well-positioned. The pillar to take, honestly, for the remainder of the year for this business is going to be the Americas. It's going to be a significant swing from a down 16% first half to a second half in that 10% midpoint. We'll see that. We saw that already as we entered April, and we'll continue to see that recovery, I think, as we go through the latter half of the year into 2022. Europe, an incredibly strong first half, driven by life sciences, activity around biofuels, the number of KOB-2 type project awards, and we continue to see that strength, and I feel confident that strength will be there into the second half of the year. Of course, across all of this, the discrete environment has been very good into Asia, Europe, and North America, whether it's automotive, medical, or semiconductor. We expect that strength to remain there. Overall, feeling much better about the second half here and feeling very good about how North America is shaping up for us in automation. Turning to chart 17, some comments on Commercial Residential. What a great year this team's having and obviously the beneficiaries of a tremendous residential cycle. Much of it was driven by pre-pandemic inventory levels, a pre-build in the cooling season. We also benefited from a secular shift into suburbs and high family home construction and renovation. All of that has led into incredible residential strength through the year. Obviously, my expectation is that starts to dampen as we get into the latter parts of the fiscal year. The mid-cycle professional tools, cold chain businesses are accelerating, and that's what we see here in this very balanced perspective for this business throughout 2021. I'm very encouraged by what we're seeing in the later cycle pieces. Of course, there's some good underlying technology evolutions as well that will impact the residential, be it the refrigerant changes or the heat pump moves in Europe, which will continue to drive good growth for these businesses. Turning to page 18, again, a very balanced picture here from a world area perspective. Overall, a strong second half with the commercial industrial segment of this business continuing to improve as the residential markets start to taper, as I discussed. I think all the world areas should grow, again in the low double-digit to mid-teen range as we go into the second half. In the Americas, we are seeing residential demand remain strong in the near term, and the commercial market's really starting to accelerate. The cold chain piece, particularly, which is driven by transport and aftermarket, we see the tools momentum building in the professional channel. Very encouraged by that. Europe, I mentioned heat pump activity. We expect that to stay strong. Of course, a surge in construction should bolster our plumbing and electrical tools business. Lastly, in Asia, China is the headline contributor to growth, as some of you have already noted, and demand is driven by commercial air conditioning and cold chain solutions. With that, Pete, I'll turn it to page 19, and we'll go to Q&A. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we'll pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question will come from John Walsh with Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning, everyone. Hi, John. Good morning. Good morning. Hi. Obviously a lot of focus will probably be on the Americas recovery. Just wanted to get your perspective in Autosols, how much of this is driven by just run rating the trends you're seeing in process against an easy compare versus the growth you expect to see in those discrete and hybrid markets there? Well, we're seeing, John, good acceleration in underlying process. We went through a period of time, as you recall, of break-fix environment with limited site access, with limited STO type of activity. That's flipped. The inoculation rates in this country have helped the confidence that customers have in having others on site and having their own folks, very honestly, on site. That's driven now a level of activity that is incredibly encouraging and is, I think, above and beyond just the simple comparisons that we have. The discrete strength to your point will remain. I don't foresee that waning, at least as we go through the year in North America. The real fuel there will be increased activity, and we're seeing that in the PO rates. We're seeing that in quotation activity and in the daily booking activity in our short to medium cycle automation businesses. Great, thank you. Obviously you updated your view here on inflationary pressure. Just as we think about the balance of the year, could you talk a little bit about the price cost equation and if there's any noticeable difference Q3 versus Q4, any timing of price related to that? Thank you. Yeah, I'll comment. As Frank noted, we adjusted our guide there from the $25 million headwind to $75 million. Again, within the construct of what we believe we can guide the overall EPS. The teams are doing a fabulous job, and particularly around the headwinds of plastic resins, copper, and steel, which have been challenging for us. I would expect as capacity comes online, John, that there's a little bit of relief on price cost. Again, that's a wait and see. We took a more conservative approach there based on what we're seeing in the market, and as we've discussed with the teams. Ram, any comments there? Yeah, I think, we do expect the bulk of the impact, frankly, in Q3 and Q4. We didn't see much of an impact in the first half as we worked down inventory, but the impact of steel and copper and resin we'll see in the second half. As Lal mentioned, we do expect, particularly in steel capacity, to come back online. Certainly, our pricing on steel in China is better than what we see in North America. Hopefully as we get into the later part of the year, we'll start seeing that steel pricing soften a little bit. That's kind of what's built into the plan. Great. I'll pass it along. Thank you. Thanks, John. The next question will come from Nicole DeBlase with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Yeah, thanks. Good morning, guys. Hi, Nicole. Morning. Hi, Nicole. Hi there. Maybe we could talk a little bit about what's going on with respect to supply chain, obviously a really hot issue this quarter. If you guys could talk about what you're seeing and to what extent that could be, I guess, a cap to upside to revenues in the second half. Certainly, a lot of press on supply chain, obviously, in terms of inflation, but also availability and shortage challenges. For example, you probably heard the electronics challenges on chip shortages. Frankly, our global teams, I would say at this point, have done a remarkable job from an availability standpoint, whether it's availability of steel, plastic resin, where we've been able to move to alternatives. On the electronics front we've managed through our supply in terms of electronic supply from Asia pretty well. The inflation side, we're managing through that. I think that is something through price and productivity programs we're addressing. To this point, we haven't seen any availability challenges. Similarly on the logistics front, whether it's ground, ocean freight or air freight, our teams have done a really good job locking in the needed capacity to bring in material from our overseas supply chains. Frankly, at preferred rates. We haven't had to go out into the spot market yet, which is where we're seeing a lot of that inflation. So far I would say we're managing through it pretty well. The other piece I would want to point out is our regionalization strategy, where we really have regional supply chains supporting our business has been a significant benefit where we haven't had to rely significantly on overseas supply chains to feed our plants. That's good. Got it. Thanks. That's really helpful. I guess, thinking about the cadence of EPS revenue margins in the third quarter versus the fourth quarter, anything you guys want to highlight there? I think usually you give us kind of a sense of what the next quarter's earnings will look like. Just anything you want to provide on three Q versus four Q. Well, Nicole, hi, this is Frank. I think we're looking at a very, very strong third quarter coming at us just based on the orders that we see and the backlog that we have available to us. I would say at this point as I look at the second half, third quarter will be very strong. The fourth quarter will be good, but a little less visibility into the fourth. That's kind of how we see it right now. Maybe it's a tad front-loaded towards the third quarter. The next question will come from Nigel Coe with Wolfe Research. Thanks. Good morning. Hi, Nigel. Very different feel to the call today. Good to hear Frank's voice. Hi, can you hear me okay? Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Nigel. Com Res. Good. On Com Res, 11% growth, nothing to sneeze at, very strong orders. The growth rate's coming in a little bit lighter than some of your OEM customers, and there's a deceleration from Q to Q. Looks like we've got some nice acceleration coming into the back half of the year, but just curious how inventory levels look in the channels and whether you saw some destocking happening during Q2. Just curious on that. Yeah, thanks, Nigel. Great to hear your voice as well. I think there's a dynamic here between residential and commercial in Com Res across the broad business, beyond climate into the tools as well, which has an impact there in terms of growth rate. We're seeing many of our OEM customers who have reported with strong residential growth. Although we have that, we have a balance in our business between cold chain and NAC. I think that's where you probably see that difference. Great. Just a bit of a random question here, Lal, but the Emerson Exchange, obviously virtual this year. How does that play out going forward? How would you judge the engagement of customers virtually versus, obviously in person? How do you think that evolves going forward? Yeah, no, great question, Nigel. I know you've attended the Exchange. It's a very special event for us in automation, as you know. We get great customer engagement throughout. We learned a lot. Obviously we didn't have a choice as we went through an Exchange season in the Americas and Europe this year. I think what we learned is that there's got to be a balance. I think there's going to be a way to engage with folks on the ground. We don't want to get away from that if we have the opportunity to do so. We can also reach a much broader base of engagement with customers through the virtual platform. Customers who may not be able to devote a day or a night of travel, who may be interested in a singular subject or a keynote, they now have the opportunity to dial in and listen in or see that presentation in a form that works for them. I think it's going to be a balance. I think some of that engagement's still going to be important because as you know, as you saw when you were there with us in Nashville, there is a lot of customer to customer engagement where the value really comes in from those discussions. We don't want to lose that. I think we, in this new construct, I think can reach a broader base of folks while not losing the original intent of the meeting. I'm excited about Emerson Exchange. I hope we can hold it in the fall. The guys are talking about the fall versus spring right now. We'll see where we land. Thanks, Lal. Best of luck. Thanks, Nigel. The next question will come from Julian Mitchell with Barclays. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Good morning. Morning. Maybe a first question on the margin outlook. You raised the EBIT margin guide to that 17.5% for the year as a whole. Just wanted to double check, sort of as we think about the second half specifically, it seems to imply maybe a sort of mid-20s incremental on the segment level and maybe a little bit lower than that, sort of all in, because of the corporate aspects and so on. Just wanted to confirm if that's roughly the right math, and any difference in incremental margins in the second half for the two divisions, AS versus Com Res. Yeah, you're talking about now the incrementals, the leverage. I think that's in the ballpark. Julian, hi, this is Frank. It's in the ballpark. The incrementals I would expect to be higher in Automation Solutions. We will have to digest the price cost headwinds in Commercial Residential, and that will be a headwind for certain on the incrementals. Nonetheless, we're going to deliver good incremental profits in the business, and we will have leverage on those sales. No doubt that it'll hold those incrementals down at least for the next couple quarters. I think you would expect to see it to be higher in Automation Solutions than in Com Res. Thanks very much, Frank. Maybe a broader question around Automation Solutions, the sort of top-line outlook and the end market backdrop there. We saw that the backlog was sort of flattish sequentially up, I think, mid-single digits year-on-year. How should we think about that Automation Solutions backlog trending from here? Understood that maybe big projects are relatively sparse, but maybe the KOB-2 stuff picks up. How do we think about that AS backlog, the pace of the pickup from here? Yeah. Good question. Good question, Julian. Year-over-year backlog in automation is up 14%, I believe is the number. Obviously, we went through the first two quarters, I'd suggest, in terms of shipping KOB-1 activity we had, particularly in our final control and systems businesses. The fuel of the revenue growth going forward becomes more mid-cycle measurement solutions and systems and discrete business. Consequently, that's more what we'd call book to ship within quarter or within quarter and a half. I wouldn't necessarily expect a significant growth in the backlog, but within the parameters that we're in today. In that, I'd suggest 10%-15% backlog growth. Without the vast KOB-1 activity, I don't expect that to grow beyond the rate we're in today. That's great. Thank you. The next question will come from Scott Davis with Melius Research. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning, guys. Good morning. Morning, encouraging comments you made on April. Must've been a pretty darn good month. I had a couple kind of completely different questions since, Lal, you're relatively new. Your compensation structure is a little bit complex for your management team. Is it one of the things you're working on, kind of adjusting early in your tenure here? Yeah. Good to hear from you, and thanks. I did make the comment, April, from an automation perspective and commercial residential perspective, continues to be on trend to what we have experienced and have expectations around. I'm encouraged by that. In terms of the comp structure, yes. I've spoken openly about the journey we're on in our culture and what we're undertaking here as an organization. I think there's a lot of energy around that across the enterprise. Compensation is absolutely something that we're looking at, and we have a task force in place today led by Lisa Flavin, and she's looking through how we compensate, the executive structure, and others. I think there's a lot of opportunity there for us. We'll take our time. We'll work very closely with the board on that as we go through the summer into the fall, and hope we have an evolution there as well. Okay, good. Just as an unrelated follow-up, the heat pump market in Europe, you guys have been talking about for a couple of quarters now. Is your product have technological differentiation? Perhaps you can maybe talk through kind of why you guys think you'll win in the heat pump market. I think we're very well-positioned, obviously, with a strong customer base we've had for a long time. I think that the technology differentiator is really around sound attenuation in the heat pumps and the efficiency. I think that's where we stand out versus what the marketplace offers, and has been a big part of the growth and what fuels the European opportunity going forward. We're excited about where the product investments have been and where we can go going forward. Sounds good. Good luck, guys. Thank you. Thank you. The next question will come from Stephen Tusa with JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Good morning. Hey, Stephen. Good morning, Stephen Tusa. Strange to be on an Emerson call in the morning. Usually we have to wait all day for this, so thanks for that. Just looking at your comparison versus 2019, your sales in the first half are down relative to 2019. Your EPS is up very comfortably, like $0.20 plus. If I just take the back half of 2019 on EPS and add it to what you just did in the first half of 2021, you're already kind of at the high end of your guidance range. The sales comps year-over-year should be pretty similar, just down moderately versus 2019 still. What's kind of the big headwind in the second half? I know price cost maybe is like $0.05 or something like that, I don't know. Seems like you're growing very strongly over 2019 without the benefit of revenue already. In the back half, you really don't show any material improvement whatsoever versus 2019. Maybe you could just help us with the moving parts there. Stephen Tusa, this is Frank Dellaquila. The obvious things in the second half that were not headwinds in 2019 are both the price cost and the stock comp. Between the two of those, you've got $70 million-$75 million of headwind, $0.08-$0.10. I take your point, but we're waiting to get better visibility into the fourth quarter. At this point, we understand that when you make the comparisons to 2019, it's not a big increase over the second half of 2019. We do have some uncertainty to work through as we go through the second half here, and we're going to see how that plays out. We think the guidance raise at this point is prudent, and we're confident we'll get there and then some as we work our way through this. Then just on the HVAC side, different players putting up different types of results, all very strong from a customer perspective. I know you guys had kind of a big end to calendar year last year. What did you see in your kind of U.S. resi kind of core compressor business this quarter, roughly? Steve, this is Lal. We had a very strong quarter. In the climate business in the U.S., we continue to see orders accelerate. Backlog conversion grew in the mid-single digits. Excuse me, sales grew in the mid-single digits and with the acceleration really occurring, as Frank pointed out, into Q3 for us. That's where you'll see this really from a purely U.S. perspective in HVAC pop for us. Right. Then just one quick one. How big is that business now as a percentage of CRNS? Historically, everybody kind of thought of you as a U.S. resi play. Given you've smashed these businesses together and China remains a big driver and Europe's growing fast, how big is that kind of core U.S. compressor business now for you guys as a percentage of CRNS? It's a sizable business, Steve. We haven't disclosed the size of it relative to the entire platform, but you can assume it's a sizable portion of the entire climate and CRS platform. Okay, great. Thanks a lot. Appreciate it. Thanks, Steve. The next question will come from Andrew Obin with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Yes, good morning. Good morning, Andrew. Good morning, Andrew. Just sort of a big picture question. As you talk to your customers in the energy industry, how set are the budgets into the year? Is there anything that can change them? Is there any sort of reason to think that there could be potential upside given massively increasing economic activity, given high oil price, or do we need to wait until next year to sort of see them change their mind? Good question, Andrew. I think budgets have been set on assumptions around demand and oil price. Having said that, they are significantly skewed towards sustainability efforts. They're skewed towards efficiency and operating elements of the business. That gives us a good baseline of confidence in the recovery in the market. Having said that, if we do see more planes in the air, more trucks on the road, broader economic activity, I think we'll see expansions in the budgetary as we go through the second half of the calendar year, into the second half of the calendar year. That will prove to be advantageous to the automation business above and beyond where we are set today. Great. Another question on Commercial & Residential Solutions. As we think about the heat pump business in Europe, you certainly guys been talking a lot about it. It seems it's part of sort of longer-term regulatory trend, but how much visibility do you have in this business over the next 12-24 months? Is it accretive to the mix, neutral to the mix? How should we think about that? Thank you. Yeah. Go ahead, Frank. Yeah, I would say we have very good visibility in Europe as well as the heat pump opportunities in China. In Europe, our engagement with the OEMs, which play in this space has been very good. These have been traditional customers of ours. As it relates to the new technology that Lal referenced in terms of efficiency and sound, our scroll product line and our complete solutions position for that market, we're in deep engagement with the OEM. I would say the visibility is good. Your question was margin accretive? Is that what your question was? Yeah. Is it good for the margin or is it bad for the margin? It's very simple. I would say it's neutral. Okay. Neutral to slightly accretive to the margins. Fantastic. Thank you so much. Andrew. The next question will come from Tommy Moll with Stephens. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Hi, Tommy. Hey, Tommy. Lal, I wanted to talk about the pathway to record margins you referenced in the release and on the call. Comparing to where we were a quarter ago, I'm thinking through the factors that may have changed. Clearly, price costs, even if a temporary factor has worked against you in the last 90 days, but maybe flow-through on some of the cost-out execution is at least as good as maybe a little bit better than expected. If you just step back and think about versus a quarter ago, the pathway and the timing and the endpoint for that record margin progression, what would you highlight for us as the most important things that have shifted? Yeah. I'll say a couple words, and I'll let Frank, who actually presented on this subject to the Board yesterday. I feel really good about the path, Tommy. We have a potential acceleration on the path in Automation Solutions with tremendous performance on the cost. The price cost that you referenced is predominantly the challenges are predominantly in our Commercial & Residential Solutions. What I'll say is that they're on track to deliver that endpoint peak margin work. I feel very positive. Slightly ahead in one platform, on track on the second platform. Frank? Yeah, Tommy, I think Lal summarized it well. We did have this conversation yesterday, and we feel very good about the timing that we laid out in February regarding the achievement of the margin targets in 2023. The pickup in the pace of volume in Automation Solutions and the flow-through of the cost reset actions that have been taken in that business basically put us a year ahead of schedule, we believe, in terms of margin improvement there, which really de-risks that plan. In Commercial Residential, very significant mitigation actions are being taken to offset the transient, this temporary price cost headwind that we're going to have for the next couple, three, four quarters. We believe strongly that we'll be right back on track to hit those targets as well. As Lal said, we feel very good based on the levers that we have, even in the face of the unexpected price cost, that we're going to get to the finish line in 2023 as we committed. That's very helpful. Thank you both. If I could follow up with a question on culture. Lal, you're now a few months in. Cultural modernization is clearly a theme that's important to you, but also one that you've made clear is tied to value creation and execution. Right. What can you provide us for an update there about the vision now that you've had a little bit of time to think through how you're going to approach it? Yeah. No, I appreciate the question, Tommy Moll. One of the first things we're doing is we need to measure where we sit today and where we want to go. We're working with an outside firm to do a cultural assessment of the 58,000 salaried employees of Emerson. We've done a pilot to understand how the tool works. We feel comfortable that we understand the tool, and we like the tool, we're going to broaden this out here in the month of May. What that's going to give us is a very important set of data. Understanding where we are and where the population of the company wants to go in terms of the culture. I would suggest that in addition to that, Tommy Moll, we've taken care of some of the low-hanging fruit, some modernization of work practices. We're working with McKinsey & Company on a diversity inclusion target and goals, which we'll publish as part of the ESG report and after conversations with our board in June. There's a lot of activity going on. We're all very energized about the opportunity, and we do believe, honestly, Tommy, at the end of the day that if we look more like the world where we live and work inside of Emerson, we'll be a better company, we'll perform at a higher rate, and we'll create more value. Thank you, Lal. I'll turn it back. Thanks, Tommy. The next question will come from Markus Mittermaier with UBS. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning, everyone. Good morning. Good morning. We covered a lot of ground already. Morning. Maybe a final question on price-cost income rates, if I could. The way I understood you is that basically Q1, Q2, you were protected from essentially using inventory. How should I read the guide to $75 million unfavorable price cost, given that, is that inclusive of future price rounds that you might be planning, or is that based on what you've done so far and your best view on inflation to date? Maybe we can start there. Okay. Markus, that incremental $50 in price cost that we've guided to is predominantly in Commercial & Residential Solutions, obviously factored into the guidance. It's a complicated subject, but with the major OEMs, we have material pass-through clauses, but they're all different, and they all operate with varying degrees of lag. While we're confident the price comes back in, it comes back in over time. Across the rest of the platform, we will take deliberate pricing actions and mitigation actions as well to offset that inside of the guide that we've provided. That's how we think about it, and that's how it will play out. That's how it's played out historically. This just is a more pronounced increase than we have seen in anybody's memory here. Okay. Got it. Maybe a broader question on China. Obviously, easy comps in the past quarter here. How do you see the momentum in both short and long cycle there on the ground? Maybe you could take us on a tour through the various verticals there on China specifically, given that it's quite sizable for you guys. Thank you. Thanks. Thanks, Markus. I feel good about what we're seeing in China. The past quarter was very, very strong across both platforms. We're seeing good activity on the automation side, KOB-3 driven, also project driven, particularly in the chemical segment, which should continue through the second half of the year. The easier comps obviously come on the climate side. Again, encouraging trends there as well, infrastructure, commercial construction driven and cold chain around transport, particularly. I feel really good about China for the remainder of the year. Teams are very engaged, I feel positive about what we'll see throughout the fiscal. The next question will come from Deane Dray with RBC Capital. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. This is Jeffrey on for Deane. My question is, I think in your prior guidance, baked in WTI prices of $45-$55 a barrel. I think we're sitting above that level pretty comfortably now. Maybe how has that changed your thinking? How has that factored into the new guidance? Maybe what are you hearing from customers? Yeah. Thanks, Jeffrey. Obviously, it's embedded in our thinking and that level of activity that we've baked into Automation Solutions and the increase in the guidance there. We're seeing that being reflected in the spend rates and the activity in the segment, more closer to that $60 number now. As you can imagine, customers are still relatively skittish as they forecast, and we talked about budgets in the past in one of the past questions here. They're watching it closely. Clearly, as reflected in the increased guidance, I feel a little bit stronger about where the WTI ultimately will land for the year. Got it. Thanks. Maybe just another one. Can you talk about just the chairman transition? Was it a conscious decision to separate the chairman role from the CEO role? Maybe, do you have any update on the timing of a potential CFO transition? Well, Jeffrey, the CFO is sitting right here with me. Yeah. I'm very happy that he's here with me. Did Deane tell you to ask that? No CFO transition in the foreseeable future here. I'm very happy that I have Frank and very blessed to have Frank, very honestly, and his experience, which will be incredibly important for this management team. Nothing there to report. In terms of the chairman, honestly, it was highly researched, debated, and discussed with the board. Obviously feel very comfortable with the separation of role to enable me to operate the company, to learn the governance piece over time, to have mentorship from the board of directors, very important. Again, as you think about the early stages of my CEO-ship, I felt that that was the right decision. I'm glad the board supported it, and I think we landed in a really good place. Very helpful. Thanks a lot. Frank, your retirement's. The next question will come from Andrew Kaplowitz with Citigroup. Please go ahead. Good morning, guys. Frank, I'm still very happy you're around. Thank you, Andy. I appreciate that. All right. Last quarter in CNRS, I think you were still wondering how your Q4 would look given tougher comparisons in residential on how the professional tools recovery would shake out. Obviously, you've refined your guide for the second half revenue growth, and you sound good about your visibility into Q4 at this stage. Could you give us more color into how you are thinking about the Q4 growth against the more difficult comps, and how that might translate in FY 2022 growth and the longer-term revenue growth guidance that you gave at the analyst day for CNRS of 5%-7%? I'll comment on it. I feel good because of the cross-section in the cycles. Right? The early cycle residential, I think we'll all agree is going to taper off, whether that tapers in Q4 or into Q1, but it will taper off. It's been incredibly hot now for a number of quarters. The good news is the balance that platform has in terms of not just in the climate side with cold chain, which is accelerating as we'll go into Q3 and Q4, but also on the professional tools side, which will balance off the consumer tool businesses, which have benefited from do-it-yourself and big store growth. The balance is incredibly strong. Gives me, at this point at least, confidence heading into the latter half of this year and honestly into a balanced perspective into 2022. It's helpful. I'm sure you guys don't want to update us on the funnel every quarter, let me ask you about in this sense. You had mentioned $6.5 billion in your funnel. Yep. I think you had mentioned 1.6 for electrification funnel. Maybe it's a good time to talk to us about an update on OSI, but also, in terms of the funnel, obviously KOB- 1 activity perking up a little bit. Are you seeing new projects enter the funnel, or is it really some of these old projects maybe starting to move a little bit? A little bit of both. Obviously, the 2 FEED stages on Baltic and Golden Island are things that have been talked about and debated and discussed for a long time. Those are starting to move forward, so that's that element. Something like a Sempra is obviously in terms of it's relatively new. We didn't know whether it was going to move forward as part of that significant eight-job LNG wave. This is the ninth job. Very important to see that. What's new in the funnel, it's still in that $6.4 billion range. The hydrogen-related element in addition to that would be about $1 billion. The electrification piece, as you said, about 1.5, 1.6. There's some newer stuff in there, it's relatively smaller. Biofuels, conversions of existing facilities or modernizations that fall into the funnel. It's relatively static, although it is encouraging, as you point out, to see some things moving to the left. In terms of OSI, phenomenal first six months with us, ahead of plan that we put together internally and presented to our board. I feel great about the management team and what they're accomplishing. Most interestingly, I feel really good about the opportunity to continue to invest in the business and expand the sandbox. I think it's a very unique opportunity for us in terms of both technology and end market diversification. We want to do both. We want to do more, both organically and if available, inorganically. Appreciate it, guys. Thanks. The next question will come from Gautam Khanna with Cowen. Please go ahead. Hey, Gautam. How are you doing? Hey, thank you very much. Gautam, you're not the only one who. I'm well, thank you. You're not the only one who gets your name massacred. I'm there with you. No, not at all. Yeah, no, we understand each other. I still remember being called Quantum. Quantum? in Little League baseball. Oh, gosh. Hey, a couple questions. First, in the quarter, what was the mix of KOB-3 at Automation Solutions, and what are you guys expecting in the second half with respect to KOB-3 versus the other two? First second quarter, first half stayed relatively consistent at 59% on KOB-3. Very honestly, I expect that to stay within that 59%-60% range as we go through the second half of the year. It's a very strong mix, obviously, for us. That's kind of where I see it, Gautam, as we go into the second half. Okay. In your opening remarks, you talked about turnaround backlog being pretty strong, visibility there being strong. Anything you're seeing with respect to scope of turnarounds that's different than you would normally see in a cyclical recovery? Any sort of change in customer buying behavior that's noteworthy? Interestingly enough. What we saw, particularly in the upgrade turnaround environment as we went through COVID, was that the systems upgrades, for the most part, continued. The reason they continued is because of the ability to perform a lot of that work virtually and remotely. We have tremendous capabilities in our DeltaV business to do that, in our Ovation business to do that, and that activity continued as system upgrades were performed around the world. What was mostly impacted was the stuff that hangs on pipes or on vessels, the valves, the transmitters, the flow equipment, in which we're now seeing the acceleration. Honestly, there's just no two ways to do that remotely. You've got to have people on site, and you've got to have a lot of people who are not necessarily familiar with your site there. What we're seeing, and we'll watch whether this is a trend or not, are two things, Gautam, to your question. Number one, the scale of the turnaround. They may be doing one or two units versus the entire facility. Secondly, the rate or the cycle at which the turnarounds are performed. Many of these facilities have now gone over 18, almost 24 months without a turnaround. They may question whether they can extend the cycle on turnarounds and the frequency of turnarounds based on this experience. We haven't necessarily gotten that message yet, but we're watching it very carefully as we go through this cycle, particularly this season over the summer into the fall. Hey, Ram, I don't know if you've got comments there. No. Thank you. Very helpful. Yes, sir. Okay. Well, I want to thank everyone for your questions and your engagement today. I felt phenomenal about my first quarter as CEO. I thank the teams. A lot of hard work and a lot of energy, and I feel really good about the momentum that we have as an organization for the second half of the year and into 2022. Thank you everyone for your time and talk soon. Thank you. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.
Loading workspace