Essential Properties Realty Trust fourth quarter 2021 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. This conference is being recorded, and a replay of the call will be available two hours after the completion of the call for the next two weeks. The dial-in details for the replay can be found in today's press release. Additionally, there will be an audio webcast available on Essential Properties website at www.essentialproperties.com, an archive of which will be available for 90 days. It is now my pleasure to turn the call over to Daniel Donlan, Senior Vice President and Head of Capital Markets at Essential Properties. Thank you, Dan. You may go ahead. Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you joining us today for Essential Properties' fourth quarter 2021 conference call. Here with me today to discuss our operating results are Peter Mavoides, our President and CEO, Gregg Seibert, our COO, and Mark Patten, our CFO. During this conference call, we will make certain statements that may be considered forward-looking statements under federal securities laws. The company's actual future results may differ significantly from the matters discussed in these forward-looking statements, and we may not release revisions to those forward-looking statements to reflect changes after the statements were made. Factors and risks that could cause actual results to differ materially from expectations are disclosed from time to time in greater detail in the company's filings with the SEC and in yesterday's earnings press release. With that, Pete, please go ahead. Thank you, Dan Donlan, and thank you to everyone who is joining us today for your interest in Essential Properties. We closed out 2021 on a strong note with $322 million of investments in the fourth quarter and $974 million invested for the full year, both records for Essential Properties. Our positive momentum has continued into the new year with over $136 million of investments closed year to date, which, coupled with our strong fourth quarter finish, has led us to increase our 2022 AFFO per share guidance to a range of $1.47-$1.51. Using the midpoint and excluding one-time fees and COVID-related adjustments, this translates to a projected year-over-year earnings growth of 14% in 2022, which follows a 16% year-over-year growth in 2021 using the same methodology. As discussed last quarter, while we continue to expect our investment trajectory to moderate in 2022, which our guidance remains predicated on, our current pipeline is robust due to the strengthening of our relationships, the vast and diverse nature of the marketplace for the properties leased to unrated and middle-market tenants, and the continued desire of our operators to expand their footprint amidst a strong economic backdrop. With that in mind, our differentiated focus on capital deployment strategies has insulated us from the increased competition, which is evidenced by our initial cash yield averaging 7.1% in 2020 and 7% in 2021. Looking at the quarter in more detail, our $322 million of investments had a weighted average cash yield of 6.9%, weighted average lease term of 16.3 years, and weighted average annual rent bumps of 1.6%. More importantly, though, 89% of these investments were derived from prior relationships, and 96% were direct sale-leasebacks on our lease form. Turning to the portfolio, we ended the quarter with investments in 1,451 properties leased to 311 tenants operating in 16 distinct industries. Our weighted average lease terms stood at 14 years, with just 5.4% of ABR expiring through 2026. Our weighted average unit level coverage was 3.7 x, which improved versus last quarter's coverage of 3.5 x. While our traditional credit statistics, which focus on implied credit ratings and unit-level coverage, experienced solid sequential improvement this quarter, these statistics remain negatively skewed for industries like theaters and early childhood education, which faced state-level shutdown and capacity restrictions well into spring of 2021 in certain areas of the country. Given that most of our tenants report trailing twelve months financials to us with a one-quarter lag, we do not expect these statistics to return to pre-COVID levels for another couple of quarters. Looking out to the balance of the year, we continue to believe our strong AFFO growth potential, combined with our well-covered dividend yield and our commitment to prudently managing our balance sheet and portfolio risks offer investors a compelling total return opportunity. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Gregg Seibert, our COO, who will take you through the portfolio and investment activity in greater depth. Gregg? Thanks, Pete. As Pete indicated, during the fourth quarter, we invested $322 million through 55 separate transactions at a weighted average cash yield of 6.9%. These investments were made in 12 different industries, with 70% of our activity coming from grocery, auto service, equipment rental and sales, early childhood education, and casual dining. The weighted average lease term of our investments this quarter was 16.3 years. The weighted average annual rent escalation was 1.6%. The weighted average unit level coverage was 3.0 x, and the average unit investment per property was $3 million. Consistent with our investment strategy, 96% of our quarterly investments were originated through direct sale-leasebacks, which are subject to our lease form with ongoing financial reporting requirements, and 59% contain master lease provisions. With that in mind, we continue to believe that our ability to process and close numerous small-sized sale-leasebacks of granular properties with existing relationships is a strong competitive advantage that produces attractive risk-adjusted returns each quarter. From an industry perspective, early childhood education remains our largest industry at 14.6% of ABR, closely followed by quick service restaurants at 12.4%, medical dental at 11.9%, and car washes at 11%. We continue to view these four business segments as tier one industries for Essential Properties, and therefore, they are likely to remain our highest concentration industries for this foreseeable future. Of note, we continue to selectively invest in proven operators of profitable locations in both the entertainment and casual dining industries, which expect to generate higher revenues and profits this year as the economy fully reopens this spring. From a tenant concentration perspective, no tenant represented more than 3.3% of our ABR at quarter end, and our top 10 accounts for just 19.7% of ABR. As noted in the past, tenant diversity is an important risk mitigation tool and differentiator for Essential Properties. By focusing on large unrated credits and middle-market businesses, we invest in a significantly greater opportunity set than strategies concentrated on publicly traded companies and investment grade-rated credits. In addition, this enables us to procure a more attractive basis in the real estate we acquire at rents that are closer to market. In terms of dispositions, we sold two properties this quarter for $4 million in net proceeds. When excluding transaction costs and properties sold subject to tenant buyback options, we achieved a 6% weighted average cash yield on those dispositions. As we mentioned in the past, owning liquid properties is an important aspect of our investment discipline as it allows us to proactively manage industry, tenants, and unit-level risk within the portfolio. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to Mark Patten, our CFO, who will take you through the financials and balance sheet. Thanks, Gregg, and good morning, everyone. As Pete noted, the fourth quarter was a record quarter for us, which closed out a record year. Net income was $30 million in the quarter and just over $96 million for the full year. Our nominal FFO totaled $48 million for the quarter, or $0.39 per fully diluted share, and $162 million for the full year, or $1.38 per fully diluted share. That's an increase of 56% and 28%, respectively. Our nominal AFFO totaled $45 million for the quarter. That's up $17 million over 2020, which on a fully diluted per share basis was $0.37, an increase of 37% versus Q4 2020. Our nominal AFFO totaled $158 million for the full year, up $51 million over 2020, which on a fully diluted per-share basis was $1.34. That's an increase of 21% versus 2020. Some of the notable elements of our reported operating results for the fourth quarter of 2021 and the full year include the following. Other revenue for the fourth quarter included approximately $1 million of prepayment fees we were paid in connection with the early payoff of approximately $92 million of principal in our loan portfolio. You should not expect this revenue to be a recurring item. We did exclude this fee income from our calculation of annualized adjusted EBITDAre, which is presented in our supplemental disclosure. Our property operating expenses in the fourth quarter totaled $1.82 million, our highest quarter this year. This was largely due to increased reimbursable expenses. Our operating expense net of reimbursable expenses was approximately $800,000 for the quarter, the lowest it's been all year. The majority of the change in our total G&A in Q4 2021 versus Q4 2020 was due to a reversal of our bonus accrual in Q4 2020, which was reflective of the challenging year that was 2020, in contrast with our record year in 2021. For the full year, we were basically flat year-over-year on total G&A. Notably, while non-cash stock compensation was up, we generated significant efficiencies in some of our third-party service relationships. Most importantly, our G&A continues to rationalize against our increasing scale, and you should expect our cash basis G&A as a percentage of total revenue, which was just 7.2% for Q4 2021 versus 8.2% for Q4 2020, to trend down favorably. Turning to our balance sheet, the elements I'll highlight are the following. With a strong close to 2021 by our underwriting investment and closing teams, our income-producing gross assets grew to $3.4 billion at year-end. From an equity perspective, our ATM program continued to provide an efficient capital source, generating $93 million of gross proceeds during the fourth quarter and $276 million of gross proceeds during all of 2021. Importantly, you'll note in our release last night that we amended our credit facility last week, which among other things, increased the capacity under the revolver to $600 million, increased the accordion to $600 million, reduced the applicable margin across all levels of the leverage grid by 20 basis points, and reduced the credit ratings grid should we opt into that grid in the future. We also extended the revolver maturity to 2026. I'll also mention that in the coming weeks, we expect to complete the repricing of our seven-year term loan into a five-year term loan that will extend the maturity into early 2027. The repricing should benefit our cost of this debt by 30 basis points. As Pete noted, our balance sheet remains strong with our net debt to annualized adjusted EBITDAre equaling 4.7x at year-end. Our total liquidity was $316 million at year-end, which obviously improved by $200 million with the upsizing of our revolver. Our balance sheet and liquidity position remains highly supportive of our investment pipeline. Lastly, I'll reiterate Pete's important note that our current investment pipeline, our portfolio outlook, and our strong performance in 2021, particularly during the fourth quarter and now continuing into the first quarter of 2022, provided us with the basis to increase our 2022 AFFO per share guidance to a range of $1.47-$1.51. Which, as Pete noted, implies a 14% year-over-year growth at the midpoint, excluding the loan prepayment fee revenue and the Q2 adjustment related to the tenants we brought back on accrual accounting. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Pete. Thanks, Mark. We are encouraged that the operating environment and our well-positioned balance sheet have allowed us to capitalize on accretive investment opportunities, which are the predominant driver of our earnings growth. More importantly, we believe our disciplined and differentiated investment strategy has created an incredibly resilient net lease portfolio that should continue to generate attractive risk-adjusted returns as we grow into the future. With that, operator, please open the call for questions. Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star key. One moment please while we poll for questions. Our first question is from the line of Nate Crossett with Berenberg. Please proceed with your question. Hey, good morning, guys. Just wanted to maybe get your thoughts on kind of the word moderate. I think you've used it a couple of times now. You know, maybe you can just help us kind of quantify what that means. You know, what's causing it? Is it just more competition? I just had a question on pricing. You know, maybe you can give us a little color on what's kind of underwritten in your guidance for cap rates. Yeah, sure. Hey, Nate. Listen, moderate has a clear definition to it. I would say that, you know, we've been using the word moderate really in connection to a heightened level. Clearly, you see that heightened level is in our fourth quarter print. Generally, we've tried to point people to our trailing eight-quarter average as a good indicator of what to expect from an investment perspective. We think that that remains a good data point, you know, roughly just under $200 million. You know, it's hard to divorce that moderate from the heightened level that we were transacting at in the back half of last year. We discussed on the last call why that level is heightened and, you know, we just expect a more normalized transaction and market, you know, in 2022. All that said, you know, as you can see by our first quarter, we're off to a great start. We got great deals and you know, we remain pretty optimistic about what we're seeing out there. As it pertains to cap rates and, you know, we transact in a pretty narrow band, and we're able to hold that band by focusing on, you know, prior relationships and direct sale-leasebacks where the counterparties are valuing us as a reliable capital provider. We avoid, you know, competing purely on cap rates. You know, if you look out over the last year plus, we've transacted in a 20 basis point cap rate range. You know, in our guidance, there's a range of assumptions. Okay, that's helpful. Maybe just one more on just the loan repayments in the quarter. Is there any trend that we should be taking away from that? How should we, I guess, be thinking about the rest of the kind of loan portfolio that you have? Yeah. You know, listen, that was sizable relative to the overall size of our loan portfolio. Our current loan portfolio is under $200 million, so clearly not material. That $200 million represents a number of loans, nothing terribly chunky. Some of those loans have prepayment options built into them. But you know, I think you know, we don't expect that to come back at us all at once. And as with the fourth quarter, we have ample notice period to you know, prepare for that and manage through that. So you know, it's not material and certainly we have the ability to kind of manage our business to deal with it when those loans come back. Okay. Thanks, guys. You got it, Nate. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Lizzy Doykan with Bank of America. Please proceed with your question. Hi, good morning. I was wondering if you could speak more to the tenants and just the properties and provide a little bit more color around that acquired subsequent to the quarter. Yeah, Lizzy, I would say, you know, there's, you know, by design, there's nothing terribly notable about our investment activity, and it tends to be very ratable. You know, we have sourcing activities across all our industries where we have relationships. If you think about, you know, transacting, you know, at a level of 80% + prior relationships, you can, you know, assume that the deals we're doing are coming from people that we've done deals with, and it looks an awful lot like our portfolio and our prior investment activity. You know, from an asset complexion, it's gonna be very granular. It's gonna be within our 16 core industries. It's gonna be, you know, predominantly sale-leasebacks on our lease form with long-dated leases and escalations. You know, there's really nothing distinguishable from our incremental investments from our overall portfolio. Okay, great. Appreciate that. Just looking historically at your weighted average cash cap rates on acquisitions, it looks like this is the first time you acquired below a 7% cap rate during the quarter. Can you just talk more to if this was, you know, a result of any specific deals bringing this down or how you expect that to trend going forward? Yeah, you know, as we've said on you know several of the last quarters, there's a lot of competition in the market. You know, really I think, you know, as I said a little earlier, a 20 basis point range over the last year, it's a pretty tight range, you know, particularly relative to the swings in interest rates and the overall cost of capital. We feel really good about our ability to hold cap rates and stay within that range. You know, certainly, 7% is a psychological hurdle, but it's really not material when you think about where we are and certainly when you translate that into the GAAP cap rate of 7%-8%. You know, it's not material to the business. You know, we hold cap rates by focusing on repeat business with existing relationships and you know, trying to get the best risk-adjusted returns we can. You know, we're confident in our ability to continue to do that going forward. Okay, great. That's all for me. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Katy McConnell with Citi. Please proceed with your question. Great. Thank you. I just wanted to talk about the acquisition pace a little bit more. Given last quarter, you'd expected acquisitions to moderate back to pre-pandemic levels, but ended up greatly exceeding that. First, just wondering if you could provide any more detail on what led to the much stronger quarter. Aside from your moderating comment, anything else you can share to help frame how we should think about a new normal in terms of a quarterly pace of deals from here? Yeah, listen. I think you know the discussion around moderation was more a forward look embedded in guidance. I think we certainly you know coupled that with a current outlook that was you know indicative of a strong pipeline, much like we're doing today. Much like I said, you know. The markets have been really robust. Transaction activity across the board is at record levels. M&A is at record levels. Our tenants are growing very rapidly and it creates a great opportunity for us to deploy capital. You know, we're not basing a forward business plan on everything remaining that rosy. You know, I think that was the context in which we were discussing it, really looking out several quarters and expecting a more normalized environment. Listen, I think, you know, with the current volatility in the markets, the increasing interest rates, you know, I think a couple quarters from now that will be the right call. As I said a little earlier, you know, we continue to point to our trailing eight-quarter average as a good indicator, which is right around $200 million. Clearly, as you think about our subsequent activity of, you know, over $100 million quarter to date, you know, we feel good about the current pipeline. Okay, thanks. Just curious what the company's latest thoughts are around providing the Street with some sort of more specific acquisition guidance now that the pipeline's become much larger and a much more significant driver of your per share results? Yeah. Listen, our external growth has been the driver of our per share results largely since coming public. You know, we invest in a very disciplined and focused way, focusing on sale-leasebacks with our existing relationship. As such, you know, we're reliant on our existing relationships to continue to grow and bring us opportunities and our ability to source new relationships. You know, that's much different than competing in a massive auction market that is underserved, where you can purely shave 10, 20, 30 basis points to increase your volume. Given the way we deploy capital, we've been reluctant to provide investment guidance because, you know, we don't control our relationships and their growth trajectory. You know, finding new relationships to transact with is a long process. You know, we give pretty good disclosure looking backwards and I think that's a good indicator of what to expect going forward. You know, we're reluctant to be more specific than that and be forced to transact purely to hit a number. Well, I think the difficulty, though, Pete, it's Michael Bilerman speaking, you know, you're now on year four being public. You're north of $4 billion with $1 billion of acquisitions, so you're quickly becoming of a big size. Your guidance includes accretion from deals. If you're not willing to outline the contribution that represents, it doesn't really help because then you don't know what's really driving the numbers. So you've embedded some acquisition accretion, but without outlining the amount, the timing, the yields, the impact of loan repayments, the guidance number doesn't really do much. Because if you're not going to provide the details of how you get to the number, I'd almost rather you not provide FFO guidance and just give us the assumptions that are built into what you're trying to target. Do the reverse, say, "There's no acquisitions in our guidance, and we're at $1.30." You know? This level of including accretion in your numbers but not telling the street how you get there is like embedding one-timers into your guidance. You're now, you know, embarking on year four of being a public company. Why wouldn't you? Well, I explained why we wouldn't, because we don't want to be forced to transact in a manner inconsistent with our investment thesis purely to meet a number that we've communicated to the street. You know, we've. Don't include the accretion in the number, right? You can't include accretion from transactions that you're not telling the street what the transaction volume is or the yields. You can't have it both ways. Sure. You can't include the accretion in FFO and then not tell the street how you're gonna get there. It's one and the same. You know, listen, we communicate very clearly to the street about what to expect as it relates without providing specific investment guidance, and I think the street has a very good understanding of what to expect from us, you know, and we haven't missed but once since being public. I think, you know, there is a good understanding of what to expect and the way and the clarity in which we operate this business. We don't control our pipeline. We very rarely have more than 90 days of visibility of what's coming at us. You know, much like 2Q of 2020 when, you know, we shut down investments given what was going on and, you know, that was the right thing to do. We weren't performing to a number that was communicated to the street or disappointing relative to that number. Certainly, managing the growth that we've communicated, we were able to do that. You know, there's a lot of ways to approach guidance, you know, I respect your opinion on that. You know, we think we provide excellent clarity and predictability, you know, this is the way we're gonna operate. Just, I haven't heard. You're including accretion in your guidance range, right? How is that additional clarity by including accretion but not telling the street how and what amount is driving that accretion, right? Your accretion could just be by buying earlier. I think if you're gonna put accretion in your guidance numbers, you sort of have to tell people how you are intending to get there or don't include it at all and then just run it quarterly and let the street come up with their own number. You're in this. There's missing pieces, and from what we hear from the investment community, it may be good for you, but it's not good for them. I'll yield the floor. All right, Michael, thank you. I look forward to seeing you in Florida. Yeah. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Ki Bin Kim with Truist. Please proceed with your question. Hi, good morning. Just going back to the transaction market and the pricing environment. Given what's happening with rates, you know, a lot of times the cap rates that you see today are priced, you know, several months before. What's your best sense of, like, real-time pricing and if rates rise a little bit higher than your long rate, how does that calculus work into your mindset about what to pay for assets? Yeah. You know, listen, Ki Bin Kim, there's certainly a correlation between cap rates and interest rates and cap rates and overall cost of capital. That correlation tends to be on a lagging basis. Our ability to move cap rates up, you know, trails the movement in underlying interest rates, you know, when they rise. Conversely, we benefit on the way down when rates are declining. But, you know, we try hard to keep the correlation static. But it takes a while. Current sellers become accustomed to rates and it's hard to adjust that in a competitive market environment, but over time, I think it will normalize. You haven't seen, not just your deals, but in terms of all the deals that you see and all the participants, have you seen any kind of spot trends and changes in pricing? You know, listen, we focus on our deals and, you know, we haven't seen that yet, but would anticipate it. I would expect, you know, there's crosswinds to that, Ki Bin, in that the broader market, there's new entrants, new competition that's, you know, driving cap rates down. Overall I would expect cap rates to stay flat, which would balance out, you know, the increase in competition against the rising rates. Okay. Just last question from me, looking at your lease spreads, the recovery rate was around 80% for a trailing twelve months of leases. I recognize that it's a small pool relative to the size of their company, but any more color around that and if there's been any kind of obvious common denominators in terms of, you know, what drove that lower recovery rate? Yeah. Listen, it is a small sample set. Generally, you know, given the vintage of our investments, you know, the only assets that are going through are re-leasing activity or assets that we take back through distress, through bankruptcy, or through lease termination. Those assets, you know, are distressed for a reason, and that's what you're seeing there. Generally, you know, I think 80% is pretty positive when you think about, you know, our 1,400+ assets and the 48 that we took back, you know, that were distressed and our ability to kind of recover rents at a high level. Okay, thank you. Thanks, Ki Bin. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Caitlin Burrows with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question. Hi. Good morning. Maybe just on the credit side, your rent coverage is up again, but I know you've mentioned that rent coverage can vary with tenant industries. Wondering if you could just go through how you're thinking of your tenants' credit quality right now and which metrics we should be focused on to figure that out. Yeah. You know, I assume you're referring to our credit distribution disclosure on page 11 of our supplement, which really shows the unit level coverage as it intersects with the underlying implied credit rating of our tenants. That's really how we look at it, is really the intersection of where a unit is not covering its rent adequately and where that sub-performing unit is not supported by a very strong corporate credit. You know, really we take the third lens of trying to understand what is our real estate basis relative to market and really sizing that risk. Overall, you know, I always like to start with the fact that, you know, we only have one vacant property. The portfolio is essentially fully leased, and everyone is current in paying and doing well. Those numbers are really on a lagging basis, as I disclosed on the call. You know, we expect those coverages in those buckets to mitigate over time. Portfolio is in great shape, our tenants are doing well, and we feel really good about the overall credit risk in the portfolio. Great. Yeah, just to follow up there, could you just go through what guidance assumes for credit events or impact in 2022 and maybe how that compares to the actual in 2021 or historically? Yeah. You know, when we do our guidance, we sit down and we look at the portfolio and try to bake in where we see specific credit risks. We look at our historical recovery rate, you know, on assets and take a specific assumption as it relates to individual tenants and, you know, what we would qualify as known potential credit issues. Then we also on top of that layer in another generic credit loss assumption into the model to make sure we're appropriately reserved. Could you quantify any pieces of those or not so much? Not so much. Okay. You know, listen, historically, you know, the asset class has about a 30-50 basis points credit loss per annum if you look back, and that's the asset class. Certainly I think, you know, we're more conservative than that. Got it. Okay. Maybe last one on the equity issuance side. Looks like, leverage is now at 4.7x. Like you mentioned, you've been pretty active with your ATM. How are you guys thinking about ATM issuance this year versus doing larger follow-on deal? I mean, I think what you'll see us do is what we've done in the past, where we've been pretty measured about it. We do like the ATM. It's a very efficient execution for us. But oftentimes, we've used the follow-on as a way to kind of meet our capital needs, and that's probably how we'll approach it in the future. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Massocca with Ladenburg Thalmann. Please proceed with your question. Good morning. Morning, John. Quick kind of detailed question on the acquisition activity subsequent to quarter end. What was either kind of the specific or rough cap rate on the $128 million of investments you closed? I would say it's the rough cap rate is generally consistent with prior quarters. Okay. Basically nothing significantly divergent from what you did in 4Q? No. Then, kind of bigger picture, noticed a couple of new car wash tenants entering the kind of top tenant list. You know, we've been hearing some stuff around relatively tight pricing for car wash assets, particularly some of the larger kind of operators in the industry. What are you seeing from a pricing perspective on those investments? I mean, especially given your overall car wash exposure went down, so you probably have some opportunity maybe to add to that from a portfolio mix perspective. Just any color there would be helpful. Yeah. Listen, you know, the amount of capital chasing car washes in the current market is astounding. It's astounding. You know, that's both from a business and a real estate perspective. I think there's a increasing appreciation of the asset class and the durability of the cash flows. You know, you can assume our decrease in exposure in the car wash space is not for a lack of transaction activities, but for a gap from where we're willing to buy the assets versus where sellers are willing to sell the assets. That said, we have good relationships in the space. We've been a trusted partner and capital provider to the space, and we continue to find incremental investment activity in the space that's meets our underwriting parameters. It's becoming an increasing struggle. Okay. You know, in terms of, I understand we kind of compare guidance versus 4Q results. You know, obviously you're not gonna have the prepayment income probably on a go-forward basis. Outside of the other kind of typical factors, right, acquisition volume, yield, kind of capital markets activity, is there anything else we should be aware of that maybe is either one-time in 4Q that won't translate out into the guidance number or that, you know, might be additive to guidance next year versus kind of what you did in 2021? Uh- Should I say this year guidance? Yeah, no. I mean, listen, I think those are the big drivers, you know, what we buy and how we capitalize it. You know, I think the rest is really certainly noise within the guidance range. There's nothing, you know, unusual in there that you should be aware of. Okay. That's it for me. Thank you very much. Thanks, John. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Omotayo Okusanya with Credit Suisse. Please proceed with your question. Yes. Good afternoon. Quick question around the early childhood schools. Just kind of curious if you could give us a sense of the outlook of that business, given everything that's been kind of going on with, you know, vaccine mandates, you know, mask mandates, both for teachers and for children, and kind of what you're seeing demand-wise and how the general health of that industry. Yeah. Those guys are doing very well, considering all that. You know, we expect it only to get better as those things, you know, mitigate going forward. If you think about some of our lower coverage assets, some of our still recovering assets, you know, as we said on the call, you know, clearly the early childhood bucket is in that space. It's a great industry. There's great demand for it, and our guys are currently doing well, and we only expect them to do better going forward. Gotcha. Also in regards to your leases, I think you mentioned earlier on that the rent bumps were, like, 1.6%. Are those fixed bumps, or do you kind of benefit at any point from, you know, kind of high inflation and leases kind of resetting to very high, you know, CPI-type numbers? You know, unfortunately we don't. That's not standard in the market. To the extent that, you know, we were demanding pure CPI escalators, it wouldn't be competitive to the market. Generally, we have fixed bumps, which from our perspective is a good thing in that, you know, over time, our tenants' profitability, sales and profitability grows faster than our rent such that these assets season favorably and into a higher level coverage as we get further and further from you know, our initial credit underwriting. It tends to be fixed. CPI is not standard in the industry and, you know, we would not expect to get outsized rent growth in an inflationary environment. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Sheila McGrath with Evercore. Please proceed with your question. Yes. Good morning. Pete, there were some interesting changes to the top ten tenant list. A few new entries, Driver's Edge, Mammoth Holdings, WhiteWater Express, and you added more with EquipmentShare. Just wondered if you could comment on some of the new tenants to the top ten, you know, about their business and if there's opportunity to continue to grow with those tenants. Sure. Thanks, Sheila. You know, we tend to have a lot of churn in our top ten specifically, you know, the bottom five, as we do more business with those tenants, and Driver's Edge is a great example of that, as is WhiteWater. We've been transacting Driver's Edge, which is GB Auto. You know, when you're doing 80% follow-on business, you can. You know, we're growing with our tenants and that's why you see them grow into the top ten and then, you know, fall out as we grow with others. We like to think and we like to hope there's growth opportunity with all our tenants. You know, you know, clearly that's what you see with top ten and WhiteWater. WhiteWater has been a rapidly growing car wash chain that has done a great job, and we've been fortunate to be able to do continuing transactions with them. What's interesting with Mammoth Holdings, which is another car wash operator, they actually bought a smaller car wash operator that we had been doing business with, so they merged into our top ten, which, you know, creates a more sizable creditworthy tenant for us. You know, that happens from time to time as well. You know, our relationships are where we look to get our growth and, you know, the bigger the relationships, they tend to be the bigger growers and create the opportunities. Okay, great. Thank you. Thanks, Sheila. As a reminder, ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. Our next question comes from the line of Greg McGinniss with Scotiabank. Please proceed with your question. Hey, good morning, everyone. Just a couple quick ones here. Going back to the question on escalators. My understanding CPI releases are atypical for the industry, but are you able to secure higher fixed escalators given the inflationary environment? The idea that I'm circling here is whether near-term inflation could lead to kinda longer term growth. Yeah, I would, you know, kind of layer my commentary around cap rates on top of that, you know, when particularly, you know, coupled with the fact that, you know, 80% of what we're doing is follow-on business and repeat business where leases have already been struck. You know, when we're doing a deal, we very much look at the entire economic package, as do our tenants and, you know, to the extent that we're, you know, trying to get outsized escalators, it's gonna, you know, one, potentially make us uncompetitive and two, create pressure on the initial cap rates. I don't see an opportunity to really, you know, push that in the current environment. You know, rest assured we're trying to get the best economic deal that we can for our shareholders, and while we win the business. All right. Thanks, Pete. Mark, I wanted to touch on the unsecured debt real quick. Where do you expect the company could raise debt today? Do you anticipate a need to access the unsecured debt market this year? I guess I'd say first, I certainly think we could access it today. Whether we would or not is obviously not something I'd comment on. The way we think about the unsecured debt market is now that we executed our first inaugural offering last June, we like that market. We think it's a very efficient market. I think we'd be inclined to utilize that market to the extent we need to incur you know this year at some point. In terms of rates, where do you think the rates? You know, look, the 10-year has been pretty volatile, as you know, so that's a bit of a mixed bag. You know, look, I think if I was to try a range, it would probably be, you know, mid to high threes. Okay. Thank you. Appreciate the clarity. Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to Pete for closing comments. Great. Well, thank you all for your participation today. You know, we were happy to report a great quarter and really a great year. We have a great outlook and a strong start to the year that we're excited about. Thank you for your time today, and we look forward to engaging with you in the future. Take care. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.