Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Quarter Two 2026 Evergy, Inc. earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentation, there will be a question and answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one one on your phone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would like to now hand the conference over to your first speaker today, Senior Director of Insurance and Investor Relations, Peter Flynn. Please go ahead. Thank you, Courtney, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Evergy's second quarter 2026 earnings conference call. Our webcast slides and supplemental financial information are available on our investor relations website at investors.evergy.com. Today's discussion will include forward-looking information. Slide two in the disclosures in our SEC filings contain a list of some of the factors that could cause future results to differ materially from our expectations. They also include additional information on our non-GAAP financial measures. Joining us on today's call are David Campbell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Bryan Buckler, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. David will cover second quarter highlights, economic development, our planned resource additions, and our regulatory agenda. Bryan will cover our second quarter results, retail sales trends, and our financial outlook. Other members of management are with us and will be available during the Q&A portion of the call. I will now turn the call over to David. Thanks, Pete, and good morning, everyone. I will begin on slide five. This morning, we are pleased to report second quarter adjusted earnings of $0.88 per share compared to $0.82 per share a year ago. Our results were driven primarily by the recovery of regulated investments, load growth, and revenues from our large load customers, partially offset by higher operations and maintenance and depreciation expense. Our solid results through June put us on target for the midpoint of full year 2026 adjusted EPS guidance of $4.14- $4.34 per share. Bryan will cover our results in more detail. Safety is a core value within our organization, and I am also pleased to report that our 2026 safety performance is trending favorably to target. This result reflects the commitment of our employees and the effectiveness of our efforts to drive continuous improvement through training, accountability, and operational discipline. We are encouraged by our progress. It's imperative that we remain disciplined going forward with the goal of sending every employee home safely every day. I also want to recognize our employees for their relentless efforts to keep the lights on during a very active Q2 storm season. In early June, we experienced back-to-back severe storms that generated straight-line winds of up to 115 mi per hour and multiple tornadoes that caused extensive damage across our service territory, ranging from central and southeastern Kansas through the Kansas City metro area. Despite these challenging conditions, our teams safely restored power to more than 300,000 customers over the course of the week following the storms. We are proud of the extraordinary efforts of our transmission and distribution teams, contractors, call center representatives, and customer service and communications teams. Their hard work, commitment to safety, and focus on serving our customers throughout the restoration process. Their dedication reflects the very best of our company. In fact, we had a major storm go through part of our territory today, and they're hard at work again this morning restoring power. In terms of reliability, we have demonstrated solid performance through the first half of the year. Our added duration and frequency metrics are tracking well relative to targets, demonstrating the benefits of our continued grid investments and the efforts of our transmission and distribution teams. I'd also like to recognize our generation team for the strong operational performance of the nuclear, fossil, and renewable fleet during the first six months of the year. In addition to our confidence in hitting our 2026 earnings guidance, our long-term fundamentals as a company continue to strengthen. That starts with the outstanding work that our employees do every day to deliver safe, reliable power. Building off of that foundation, our customer and economic development prospects continue to be exceptionally strong, as I'll speak to momentarily. When we put it all together, we have high confidence in our plan, and we are reaffirming our long-term adjusted EPS growth target of 6%-8% + through 2030 off of the 2026 midpoint of $4.24. We expect adjusted EPS growth to exceed 8% annually beginning in 2028 and through 2030. Slide six summarizes our data center announcements to date. In aggregate, we have executed ESAs for five data center projects under our LLPS tariffs, securing the strong protections that the tariff requires for current customers. These five ESAs include steady-state peak load of approximately 2.5 GW. When including the 500 MW of steady-state peak load from non-LLPS large customers, such as Panasonic and smaller data centers, the total reaches 3 GW. We continue to make progress towards agreements on expansion projects and are highly confident that we'll execute at least one more ESA in 2026. We anticipate providing more details on our third quarter call in November. Momentum with our customer pipeline and discussions on new projects is outstanding, and we expect that to continue into 2027. As a reminder, any additional ESAs would represent further upside and/or extension to the remarkable load growth and business expansion created by the 3 GW of large customer ESAs already signed. These economic development wins solidify Kansas and Missouri as premier destinations for data center customers and will empower growth, enable investment, and help drive prosperity for our region. Slide seven summarizes the progress we've made in converting our large customer pipeline into signed agreements and provides an update on activity further down the queue. Starting in the top row, the 3 GW include the five announced ESAs and large customers that have already commenced operations. This Tier 1 demand enables the transformative growth opportunity for Evergy, supporting our expected 78% annual retail load growth through 2030. This total consists of projects already in operation, progressing towards the steady state of 1.3 GW, as well as 1.7 GW of additional projects that have executed ESAs contractually requiring minimum multi-bill provisions spanning 16-17 years, whether or not the capacity is fully utilized. Regionally, these will deliver significant benefits, including supporting a leading-edge digital economy, creating jobs, and significantly expanding the local tax base while enabling us to spread systems costs over a broader load profile to main affordability for all customers. In the next category, we highlight approximately 2.0 GW-2.5 GW of expansion opportunities, up from the 1 GW-1.5 GW we disclosed last quarter. These expansion opportunities are at or adjacent to our existing customer sites. Further agreements or, excuse me, future agreements related to these opportunities would require amending load ramps and existing ESAs or new ESAs, and we are working on the transmission and generation solutions to enable them. To be clear, our five-year financial plan does not incorporate any impact from these potential expansion projects, which would create upside in the near term and well into the 2030s, depending on individual project timing. Additionally, we are in advanced discussions with multiple new customers in our Tier 2 category, representing approximately 1 GW-2.0 GW. These customers have acquired land or land rights, signed letters of agreement, and we are actively reviewing transmission and generation capacity solutions. The opportunity from these customers is primarily beyond 2030. Taken collectively, the Tier 1 expansions and Tier 2 customer opportunities reflect strong momentum with multiple additional projects that would further extend our exceptional earnings and load growth well into the next decade. The remaining pipeline, totaling well over 10 additional gigawatt, highlights a robust activity and sustained interest in our region. Serving this load will require working in tandem with our customers to identify creative solutions with our customers who stand ready to move forward as capacity opens, allowing us to prioritize the best fit projects as the queue evolves. Slide eight provides an overview of our expected resource addition that will support this load growth. First, the resource additions reflected in the table are consistent with our February 2026 CapEx plan of $21.6 billion over the next five years. Informed by our 2026 IRP preferred plans in Kansas and Missouri, we now expect approximately $1 billion of incremental capital driven by the generation resources needed to serve the customer agreements we have secured. In total, the preferred plan through 2032 include more than 5 GW of new additions, with approximately 3.9 GW of natural gas, nearly 800 MW of solar, and 450 MW of battery storage. This resource mix reflects an all-of-the-above approach that supports reliability, affordability, and long-term customer needs while positioning Evergy to serve significant economic development across Kansas and Missouri. Of note, additional load beyond the 3 GW signed to date is expected to require incremental generation resource needs and incremental CapEx as a result. The 2026 IRP planning process involved identifying the most cost-effective plan that reliably serves our customers across uncertain future scenarios. These natural gas additions, combined with solar and battery storage, are planned in a manner that will allow Evergy to take advantage of best-in-class efficiency and technology and support economic development in our service territory, while at the same time helping to advance our strategic objectives of affordability and reliability. Moving to slide nine, I'll provide a brief update on our regulatory priorities in Kansas and Missouri. On the Kansas side, we have filed notice for an upcoming predetermination application, which is planned to include three generation assets, a new natural gas plant, a solar farm, and a battery storage facility. These new additions are consistent with the 2026 IRP preferred plan. We look forward to sharing more specifics when the application is filed later this year. Pivoting to Missouri, we continue to work through our pending Missouri Metro rate case. The procedural schedule calls for rebuttal testimony by August 11th, serve rebuttal and true-up direct testimony on September 10th, settlement conferences commencing September 23rd, and hearings beginning October 5th. We look forward to working collaboratively with our regulators and our stakeholders to achieve a constructive outcome for our Metro customers. Similar to Kansas, in Missouri, we have filed notice for an upcoming certificate of convenience and necessity request, or CCN, related to a new natural gas plant, a solar farm, and a battery storage facility. We will share more details once the applications are filed. Separately, we have a pending CCN request for the planned Mullin Creek # 2 facility, a 440 MW simple cycle gas turbine located in Nodaway County, Missouri. Staff's report is due September 15th, followed by a settlement conference on September 22nd, with hearings beginning October 19th. I'll conclude my remarks with slide 10, which highlights the core tenets of our strategy. We remain committed to keeping customer rates affordable while making the investments necessary to support reliability, economic development, and long-term growth. We have delivered significant improvements in regional rate competitiveness since our company was formed in 2018, and are today, Evergy's average residential customer rates are below national and below Midwest averages. Consistent with this ongoing focus, we signed on to the White House's Ratepayer Protection Pledge last week. Our large load tariff framework is well-aligned with the principles in the pledge and is designed to ensure that new large customers pay their fair share of the infrastructure and generation costs required to serve them, while at the same time helping to protect affordability for existing customers. This ensures alignment across stakeholders so that we can turn generational investment and growth opportunities into demonstrable benefits for all in our region. While our capital investment plan is higher than historical levels, it is supported by unprecedented load growth. New large load customers contribute premium revenues that help cover the cost of serving them and the investments required to support growth, while increasing energy sales allow us to spread system costs across a larger base. We expect to see customer rate increases over the next several years being in line with or below inflation for the significant majority of our residential customers. Missouri West is our smallest utility today, with the lowest rates in our system and some of the lowest rates in the nation, partly because the utility is in need of infrastructure investment, in particular, new dispatchable baseload generation. As a result, as new generation plants come online to serve Missouri West, these customers may see rate increases above inflation over the next five years. We still anticipate their rates will remain regionally competitive, and these investments will reduce the reliance on market-provided energy, making rates more stable for our Missouri West customers. Longer term, as the full benefits from large load customers are realized, we are confident that we can manage residential rates to a level consistent with inflation, and all Evergy customers will benefit from these infrastructure investments for decades to come. As outlined in our capital plan, we will continue to invest in grid modernization to ensure reliability as well as grid resiliency, strong customer service, and generation availability. Our primary sustainability goal is to execute a cost-effective, all-of-the-above generation strategy, as reflected by our planned investments in natural gas, solar, and battery storage to support our Kansas and Missouri customers. We look forward to continuing to advance a mix of resources over the coming years to support growth and prosperity in our states. I will now turn the call over to Bryan. Thank you, David. Thank you, Pete. Good morning, everyone. Let's begin on slide 12 with a review of our results. For the second quarter of 2026, Evergy delivered adjusted earnings of $209 million, or $0.88 per share, compared to $191 million, or $0.82 per share in the second quarter of 2025. As shown on the slide from left to right, the year-over-year drivers are as follows. First, margin from load growth resulted in a $0.10 per share increase for the quarter. We recorded higher revenues this year from the March 2026 start of operations of a large data center and from Panasonic's ramp of operations. Combined, these two customers had an approximate $0.04 benefit to EPS compared to the prior year quarter. Overall, weather normalized demand grew 1.8%, primarily driven by commercial and industrial demand. We also had a warmer start to the summer, resulting in an increase in cooling degree days compared to prior year, with weather essentially normal in the second quarter compared to the mild weather in Q2 2025. Next, recovery of and return on regulated investments driven by new retail rates in our Kansas Central jurisdiction and FERC-regulated investments contributed $0.10 of EPS. Offsetting these favorable drivers, the combination of higher O&M and increased depreciation and interest expense net of AFUDC drove an $0.08 decrease in EPS. Finally, other items netted a decrease of $0.06, inclusive of $0.02 of dilution from convertible bonds. It has been a very solid start to the year, and we are in good shape to meet the midpoint of our 2026 EPS guidance range of $4.14 - $4.34. To assist investors and analysts with their modeling, we are providing third quarter adjusted EPS guidance of 50%-53% as measured against the $4.24 midpoint of our 2026 adjusted EPS guidance range. Turning to slide 13, I will provide more detail on our sales trends. On a year-to-date basis, weather normalized demand has grown 3.3% and remains on track with our full year expectations. This is driven primarily by higher commercial and industrial usage. Commercial demand grew 4%, reflecting the initial ramp-up in higher usage associated with data center projects. Industrial demand grew 6.2%, buoyed by Panasonic's continued ramp. At a macro level, the robust customer demand in our service areas is supported by a solid labor market as Missouri, Kansas, and Kansas City metro area unemployment rates remain below the national average, with a healthy increase in residential customer in-migration. We are fortunate to be able to serve in these Kansas and Missouri communities. Few regions in the United States are as well-positioned to benefit from the accelerating national investment cycle in power infrastructure and data centers as the Kansas City metropolitan area. The region's deep concentration of EPC firms and highly skilled engineering talent creates a competitive advantage that should drive sustained economic development, employment growth, and increased electricity demand in both Kansas and Missouri for years to come. Moving to slide 14, we highlight our large load demand growth profile. As indicated on the chart, the large load customer ramps are already underway and are expected to continue building in aggregate through 2030 and beyond, supporting our retail load growth CAGR of approximately 7%-8% through 2030. This reflects the impact of Digital Realty, the fifth ESA customer announced on our first quarter call. This chart illustrates a powerful period of growth anchored by long-term contracts and clear parameters on monthly billings. Providing significant visibility into our earnings growth and cash flow streams for the ESA LLPS contract terms that generally span 16-17 years. In addition, we continue to make strong progress with several other large customers. While not reflected in the chart, we expect to execute at least one additional ESA in 2026 and keep this strong momentum going in 2027. The associated load and capacity that would be served under these potential incremental ESAs would represent further upside to load growth in the near term, and importantly, it has the potential to extend our exceptional load growth well into the 2030s. As David described, we will continue working in a measured and disciplined manner through our substantial pipeline of prospective customers to build on the success we have achieved to date. Let's close on slide 15 by recapping our strong growth outlook. First, based on ESAs already signed, we currently project load growth of 7%-8% through 2030. As I just mentioned, we are working with several customers on potential projects at existing and new sites that could have significant positive impacts to load growth well into the 2030s. Secondly, the foundational earnings power of the company will be fortified by our $21.6 billion capital investment plan. Based on our filed 2026 IRPs, we see incremental investment of approximately $1 billion to that forecast, with further upside potential as we sign more large load customer ESAs. We plan to update our capital plan during the fourth quarter call in February. As I mentioned on our first quarter earnings call, this $1 billion increase in generation investments is projected to raise our rate base CAGR through 2030 to approximately 12%, compared to our previous disclosure of 11.5%. Additional ESAs are expected to require further capacity resources and related investment. As our capital investment plan grows, we will utilize a prudent mix of debt and equity financing to support our strong investment-grade credit rating and FFO to debt that we currently project to be in the range of 14%-15% from 2026 to 2028, with further strengthening in outer years. On the equity front, we continue to make progress utilizing our ATM program, having priced approximately $425 million through forward sales agreements as of June 30th that will be settled later in 2026. This represents more than half our expected $700 million-$900 million of equity we expect to issue during the year. As we look to the remainder of the year, our remaining equity needs are addressable through our ATM program, and we currently have no plans for block issuance. Turning to our EPS outlook, we are reaffirming the midpoint of our 2026 adjusted EPS guidance at $4.24. Beginning in 2028 and through 2030, we expect annual earnings growth to exceed 8%. As we have discussed on prior calls, we continue to forecast an approximate 250 basis point delta between rate base growth and EPS growth, which is now compared against the 12% rate base CAGR discussed earlier. In summary, continued execution on our large customer opportunities is further strengthening our financial outlook, supporting long-term growth while delivering meaningful affordability benefits for our customers. I speak for the entire leadership team in saying that we are excited about the future at Evergy and are deeply committed to successfully executing on our business plan and delivering consistent results for our customers, communities, employees, and shareholders. With that, we will open up the call for questions. Thank you. At this time, we'll conduct the question and answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question, you'll need to press star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from the line of Steve D'Ambrisi with RBC Capital Markets. Steve, your line is now open. Good morning, guys. Thanks very much for taking my question. Morning, Steve. Morning, Steve. Just had a quick one. Obviously, there's a lot of moving pieces here, and I appreciate that you laid out the incremental capital from the IRPs as well as kind of what could be further upside. Can you just, if we take a step back and think about potentially what could be signed from the Tier 1 bucket, in this year that you've talked about having an additional signing and what type of generation requirements would be needed and capital requirements needed, where we think rate base growth could go? Obviously, you took it from 11.5%-12% with this upside $1 billion, just trying to understand kind of where growth is going here. Sure. Steve, I'll take a whack at it. Bryan, feel free to supplement. We've laid out, we've got a really exciting set of discussions that are underway with our Tier 1 and the Tier 2 categories that we lay out on the slides. There's 2 GW- 2.5 GW of expansion opportunities that are at or adjacent to existing sites. We're really excited about those because we know the customers. We've got a good sense for what the needs are from a transmission and distribution infrastructure perspective. Very excited about those. We're also excited about the Tier 2 advanced discussions as well. There's meaningful expansion opportunity around the 3 GW that we described. In terms of timing, what we've laid out is we expect to sign at least one additional ESA this year. We didn't specify what the timing is. We have five signed ESAs. The amount of load under those ESAs is about 2.5 GW. That gives you a sense, a rough sense for how big these typically are. They're not all the exact same size. That gives you a rough sense. To serve incremental load, we do expect that there are going to be additional resource requirements, primarily generation related. We're seeing cost trends that are in line with what you're seeing for other utilities. The capital investment that would follow is pretty meaningful. It would drive, we expect, incremental CapEx. Most of the customers that we've worked with to date, the discussions that are underway today, they're looking for being provided firm power from our resources. Our LLPS tariff allows us to make sure that we're charging them for their fair share and that they're paying a premium rate. We can accommodate if folks, for example, sign PPAs in the marketplace or bring generation, but most of our customers have been looking to us to provide firm power out of system resources, that we expected that to be the general trend line. We see meaningful upside. Again, we said expect at least one additional ESA this year. We expect the momentum from these discussions to continue into 2027. We haven't quantified the exact amount we expect to sign this year other than saying we do expect, we have high confidence signing one additional ESA this year. We do think it'll drive incremental capital requirements. If you look at how the capital has ramped over time as we've added investments, it gives a good sense for what the potential knock-on effects would be. How it really summarizes our confidence in the pipeline and the really high interest in our customers in our territory, that's under that LLPS framework that makes sure that they were charging them the appropriate rate. That's very helpful, David. Thanks. Just as a follow-up, not to get ahead of myself and ask for more disclosures early, but clearly as you sign Tier 2 options to the pipeline and just that ends up adding capital to the beyond 2030 plan. Any thoughts on providing a longer-term look? You've seen some of your peers give capital plans or illustrative growth rates into the middle of the next decade just to highlight the confidence and the duration of the growth profile. I think that that's a fair point, Steve. We certainly want to lay out what our expectations are. Even from the material that we have and the ESAs we've signed, you'll see that we give a ramp of those ESAs over time. When you get out to 2030, the total amount of the peak load we expect is between 2.05 GW and 2.25 GW. That obviously is indicative of 750 to nearly a gigawatt of incremental load ramp beyond 2030. While the expansion opportunities have some potential impact in the five-year window, both the expansion opportunities and the Tier 2 have a ramp that's well into the 2030s, and the resource needs will be in that timeframe as well. We know that visibility is going to be important. What I'd express today is, as you've heard us describe, we believe that this momentum in our pipeline, if we're able to convert, as we expect to have at least one ESA and we don't expect to stop there. That has upside potential both over the near term and well into the 2030s. We know that you all will be looking for more specificity on that, and we'll certainly plan on giving that level of specificity as we capitalize on the momentum in our pipeline. Thanks, David. Thanks, Bryan. Appreciate the time. Thank you. Thank you. Our next call comes from Shar Pourreza with Wells Fargo. Your line is now open. Hi, team. Actually, it's Andrew Kadavy for Shar. I was wondering, could you maybe characterize the customer profile for the pending 2026 ESA? Is it another hyperscaler? Yeah, go ahead. Sorry. Yeah. You see the mix of customers we have today. We've got two ESAs with Google, one with Meta, one with Digital Realty, which is a very large data center developer, one with Beale, which is an enterprise with a lot of experience in this arena. We won't get ahead of saying what customer signing. We've got high interest from all of our customers and expansion opportunities. I think if you consider what our Tier 1 expansions and Tier 2 profile looks like, it's probably a mix that's reasonably consistent with the mix we've had today. High quality, hyperscaler counterparties or data center developers who are experienced in this space. We have visibility that they're obviously aligned with hyperscale customers on their own. That's confidential. We won't share it, but got visibility in the customers they're serving. I think you can view the profile that we've disclosed to date of the customers that we've signed up, and that going forward, it'll be a similar kind of profile. Thanks for that. On the political side, can you comment on the data center moratorium to become a campaign issue for the Kansas governor's race? Is the noise there affecting your commercial discussions with potential customers? There's a lot there. Let me comment on elections and local sensitivity to data centers broadly, because I do think that how you approach data centers is important for every local jurisdiction. First, just commentarily on the election. Data centers, compared to certainly some other states, we're not as prominent in the primaries on the Kansas side. There are no major statewide races in Missouri this year. Only the state auditor is up for re-election. On the Kansas side, there is a gubernatorial election. Current governor is term-limited and not standing for re-election. On the Republican side, Ty Masterson, the Senate President, won the primary. He's an experienced legislative leader, a senate president who's been supportive of economic development infrastructure investment. He's certainly going to be attentive to the Ratepayer Protection Pledge, understands the LLPS tariff, and making sure that large customers pay their fair share. He's demonstrated support for economic development infrastructure investment. Cindy Holscher won the Democratic primary. She's a state senator from Johnson County, and we've worked with her in the past. In the past, in Kansas, we've been able to advance constructive measures relating to infrastructure investment with support from leaders in both parties, and we're confident that will be continued our focus. It has not been nearly the prominent issue as in some other states. What I'd emphasize is that as you think about siting data centers, it's really similar to all major projects. You have to move forward in the right spots. It's not going to work everywhere. Some places won't be well-suited for data centers, for some others, with the right kind of land set up, with the right kind of infrastructure set up, with the appetite for the economic development, the jobs, the expansion of tax base, it can move forward. We have some places that are well-suited. We are working with high-quality developers, hyperscale customers who know how critical it is to develop facilities in areas where the communities are receptive, and we'll be working with them to move it forward. We're confident in that issue. It's obviously a sensitivity point that gets a lot of commentary in the market today. I would describe it, if you've been in this business, if you've been in the utility business or transmission line siting and facility siting, you always have to be sensitive to it, and we're certainly very focused on that as are the customers who are at the top of our queue. Thank you for that. I'll leave it there. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Our next call comes from Paul Patterson with Glenrock Associates. Your line is open. Hey, how you guys doing? Good morning. How are you, Paul? All right. Most of my questions have been asked, actually asked, but just, could you go over the rate increase impacts? You guys went a little quickly, and I apologize, but you mentioned that you guys expect to go, I think, in the rate of inflation or lower. Is that a floating number, or is that basically based on a specific idea about what inflation will be? Secondly, with respect to, you mentioned that there was a difference in one jurisdiction, and if you could just go over that again, I apologize, but if you could clarify that for me, I'd appreciate it. Sure. Thanks, Paul. It's obviously a very important topic. We've been focused on affordability. It's been at the forefront of our discussions really since the merger in 2018 that formed Evergy. We're proud of the trajectory that put us on, so we've been focused on the topic and being able to demonstrate real benefits in regional rate competitiveness and getting our rates below Midwest and national averages over the past several years. We've proven that to our customers. The comments that I laid out are based on our modeling of what we expect rate impacts to be, and the impacts of the LLPS tariff, which is set up to make sure that the large customers pay their fair share. What I described was we expect that rate increases for residential customers will be in line with or below inflation for the majority of our residential customers. Now, where inflation is, we all track the Fed. I know that inflation currently is a little north of 3%, which is a little disappointing. The Fed is hoping has its target of 2% over time. We certainly hope that the inflation will get more to that 2% range. Right now, inflation is trending in the 2%- 3%. We're not modeling it at some level higher than that. The jurisdiction that I spoke to was Missouri West. Missouri West has the lowest rates in our system today, some of the lowest rates in the nation. Part of the reason for that is it has relatively less infrastructure. Our customers have benefited from that in Missouri West for many years, but we're in a position where there are a couple of factors that relate to that. One is that they're more exposed to market energy prices. When there's volatility in a Winter Storm Fern or a Winter Storm Uri, there's more volatility in the fuel costs that can lead to some variability in Missouri West rates. The second factor is, as capacity becomes tighter, we need to make investments in Missouri West so that they're well situated to be able to meet their needs. We do expect over the coming years that Missouri West residential rates will be over inflation, though over time, we expect those to stabilize. We certainly expect that they'll remain competitive within our system and within our region, and will leave Missouri West customers, I think, in a much better place with resources that will benefit them for decades to come. On the affordability front in data centers, one thing I'd emphasize, we are in only one rate case currently. That's in Missouri Metro. In our Missouri Metro rate case, as part of our initial filing, we actually reduced the revenue requirement we would otherwise have requested by $25 million, about a 15% decrease in our requested revenue requirement because of data centers. This is in advance of even generation investments having an impact in Missouri West. It's a demonstrable impact of how these large load customers, how the LLPS tariff can drive knock-on benefits for all of our other customers. We actually expect that $25 million amount or that 15% reduction, that relative reduction is going to even increase further as we get to the true update because that large customers continues to ramp. In other words, the beneficial impact of that data center will be even more consequential in terms of it helping our other customers. This affordability narrative is one that we model carefully, we think about systematically, and we'll continue to do so going forward because we really think, actually, this opportunity with large load is unique in how it not only will drive prosperity in terms of tax base and construction and a digital economy, but helping to drive affordability benefits for all our customers. I know it's a long answer, but obviously a very important topic and one that we'll continue to focus on. Awesome. Thanks so much. Just on the Metro rate case, do you think there's a potential for a settlement or anything now that testimony's been filed and I guess rebuttal testimony's coming up pretty soon? I'm just wondering, what are your thoughts about that? We've been able to successfully settle our last couple of Missouri rate cases, as have many other utilities in the state, including Ameren. I went over the procedural schedule. The rate case in Missouri tends to follow a specific schedule, including for a settlement conference, so that we'll have a few more rounds of testimony filings, and that settlement conference is scheduled in the late September timeframe. Okay. We look forward to working with staff, with other stakeholders, and working towards a constructive resolution. It's a pretty straightforward rate case in the sense that it's largely infrastructure investment and then a unique feature that it's actually with a positive benefit from our data center customer. Awesome. Thanks so much. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Anthony Crowdell from Mizuho. Hey, thanks so much. David, Bryan, just two quick questions. I guess, one, you give us the, I don't know what the right term is, maybe the 250 basis point, maybe if I called financing lag between rate base and earnings growth. I guess, does that fluctuate or is that pretty consistent? Is it dependent upon maybe rate outcomes or capital getting into rate base? Just how, I guess, linear or stable is the 250 basis points? Well, it's a great question. We will obviously give an annual view of guidance over time as we get closer each year. What we've described is we expect, in our 6%-8%+ long-term earnings growth target, that we expect earnings growth greater than 8% annually starting in 2028. In other words, starting from 2027 to 2028, we'll see that increase, and afterwards. There's some impacts that come from when plants are online and the trajectory of the load profiles of our large customers. We've given a sense for when the plant schedules are and also what the annual contractual terms under our ESAs. It's a steady progression, as you'll see in those charts. There's inevitably some impacts that come from, because the rate case will typically follow when some of these large generation projects come online. In terms of that general rule of thumb, the 250 basis point difference between our average annual rate base growth and our earnings growth, we view that as pretty steady. What's effective here is that while you have some lag from your investments to when they're reflected in earnings power, as well as impacts from financing over time, you're also having load growth over time. Given that the load growth is increasing pretty steadily, we do see that as a pretty stable relationship over the trajectory. Great. Then just lastly, you're one of the few utilities that I think most of the coverage I have, there's kind of like a, utilities have jurisdictions of kind of like a have and have-nots, where there's an aggregation of some of the large load to maybe one of their service territories, but the other one maybe is not as desirable. You guys seem to be doing very well with the large load tariffs in both Missouri and Kansas. I'm just curious, when you talk to your customers, what are some of the positive attributes that make them choose Kansas or make them choose Missouri? Just why is load maybe leaning more towards one state or the other? Well, I think you captured it accurately that both states are viewed as very attractive by our large customers. Individual customers will come down to where do they have the land prospects? Where have they found the most specific opportunity? The general setup in both states is viewed as constructive and positive, and the tariffs are pretty similar between the two. It was first approved on the Kansas side, then it was subsequently approved on the Missouri side. They're pretty similar provisions. That LPS tariff that sets a premium rate to make sure they pay their fair share, pretty consistent terms. The ability to have that predictability, the attractiveness of our region. If you've ever been to Kansas City, the state line just goes through the middle of the city in many ways. The attributes that make our region attractive are similar between the two states. There's some differences, of course. The fundamentals are such that our customers like both states. That's reflected in the five that we've signed. Initially, Missouri was a little ahead, but Kansas got the LPS tariff approved. Right now, what I describe is it comes down to where are you finding local communities that meet those criteria that I described earlier, where it makes sense for that local community, and we see those in both states, and certainly our customers do as well. I guess for you guys, it really, wherever the Chiefs move, it's going to be in your service territory, right? Our service territory is, I think it's fair to say, overlaps heavily with Chiefs Nation. We've got some munis and co-ops across our territory, so that can have some impact. Yes, whether either side of the state line, you're going to see some rabidly partisan in our service territory. Yeah, we're pretty consistent. Well-positioned. Thanks so much for taking my questions, guys. You bet. Thank you. Thank you. This concludes the question and answer session. I'd like to now turn it back to the President and CEO, Mr. David Campbell. Efficient today. Thank you very much, everyone, for your interest in Evergy. With that, we will conclude today's call. Thank you.