Good morning, and welcome to FB Financial Corporation's first quarter 2021 earnings conference call. Present on the call today from FB Financial is Chris Holmes, President and Chief Executive Officer. He is joined by Michael Mettee, Chief Financial Officer, Greg Bowers, Chief Credit Officer, and Webb Evans, President of FB Ventures, who will be available during the question and answer session. Please note, FB Financial's earnings release, supplemental financial information, and this morning's presentation are available on the investor relations page of the company's website at www.firstbankonline.com and on the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at www.sec.gov. Today's call is being recorded and will be available for replay on FB Financial's website approximately an hour after the conclusion of the call. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen-only mode. The call will be open for questions after the presentation. With that, I would like to turn the call over to Robert Hoehn, Director of Corporate Finance. Please go ahead. Thank you, Ian. During this presentation, FB Financial may make comments which constitute forward-looking statements under the federal securities laws. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties and other facts that may cause actual results in performance or achievements of FB Financial to differ materially from any results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Many of such factors are beyond FB Financial's ability to control or predict, and listeners are cautioned not to put undue reliance on such forward-looking statements. A more detailed description of these and other risks is contained in FB Financial's periodic and current reports filed with the SEC, including FB Financial's most recent Form 10-K. Except as required by law, FB Financial disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained in this presentation, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. In addition, these remarks may include certain non-GAAP financial measures as defined by SEC Regulation G. A presentation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation of the non-GAAP measures to comparable GAAP measures is available in FB Financial's earnings release, supplemental financial information in this morning's presentation, which are available on the investor relations page of the company's website at www.firstbankonline.com and on the SEC's website at www.sec.gov. I would now like to turn the presentation over to Chris Holmes, FB Financial's President and CEO. Thank you, Robert. Good morning, everybody. Thank you for joining us this morning. We appreciate your interest in FB Financial. We had another successful quarter as we delivered adjusted EPS of $1.12 per share, adjusted ROAA of 1.89%, and adjusted return on tangible common equity of 20.9%. We grew our tangible book value per share to $22.51 or 14.6% annualized. With each day that passes, our markets get a little closer to normal, and that's reflected in a few of our numbers this quarter. We had $31 million in loan growth, excluding PPP, for 1.8% annualized. Through February, balances were actually down $89 million, but then we had a very strong March with $120 million in growth. As our markets bounce back, customer demand for loans continues to build. We still feel good about our mid to high single-digit annual loan growth target that we set for ourselves. We released $13.9 million from our allowance for credit losses this quarter as continually improving economic forecast dictate that we bring down our reserves. Following this reserve release, our allowance to loans, excluding PPP, is 2.29%, down from 2.48% last quarter. Assuming no further COVID waves or hiccups in the recovery, we would expect those releases to continue in the near term as economic outlooks continue to improve. Our full deferrals of principal and interest are down to $21 million, and we have $131 million of loans on interest-only payment schedules. Of the $131 million on interest-only schedules, $76 million are hotel loans. We continue to feel optimistic about the ultimate resolution of our loan deferrals. Our net charge-offs were five basis points this quarter. We're still cautious, and we still have significant reserves in case we do experience any credit events, but we don't have any knowledge of anything specific that causes us any concern. With each passing quarter, we grow more optimistic that we'll get through the pain of COVID without any serious credit losses. Beyond the numbers, our associates have returned to the office. This is crucial for the internal projects that are our current focus. While a remote world has been effective for most tasks and for a limited time period, face-to-face interaction is crucial for the goals that we have for ourselves this year. Each time we speak to investors individually, we harp on being better operators than our competitors. Most of the goals and initiatives from our strategic plan are geared towards ensuring that we run a better bank for our customers than our competitors do. Most services in banking are commoditized. Our value proposition for our customers is to be faster with less friction while providing better advice than our competitors, whether that's a bank, a credit union, or a FinTech company. From an infrastructure standpoint, that means ensuring that a customer can attain any product with us they could with any other competitor. Second, that means enabling the customer to do business as conveniently as they can with any competitor, be it online, on their telephones, or through a branch location. From a personnel standpoint, we do that by setting up regions, investing our regional presidents with the power to operate their regions as independent community banks. Each of our regions is divided into markets. Each market has a president, and individual relationship managers report up to those market presidents. Very few banks our size and larger have chosen to stick with the community banking model. From a risk and uniformity standpoint, it's simpler to go with a centralized line of business model. The unintended operational consequences of a centralized model are the reason that smaller community banks have historically been able to pick off talent and customers from larger banks. Relationship managers tend to get dissatisfied with their work environments, and customers grow frustrated by the lack of responsiveness that's birthed out of broken centralized processes. Since I've been with FirstBank, our goal and desire has been to keep our community banking strategy and model regardless of size. We've been able to maintain that well enough, but now that we have 12 billion in assets and have very strong organic growth prospects across our footprint, we're taking the time and working hard to review and challenge the customer experience, support functions, risk management functions, and other processes that allow us to maintain our community bank model and will be scalable up to 20, 30, 40 billion, and even more. With that explanation about our regional model, we're excited to announce a newly formed Central Alabama region with the hiring of our first four banking division associates in Birmingham, two of which are very experienced senior bankers. We have long had a more strong mortgage presence in Birmingham, with our retail channel's leadership being based in Vestavia Hills. Our foothold in mortgage in Birmingham made it a logical market expansion for us, and we couldn't be happier to welcome these associates to the FirstBank team. We're working through the branch application process with the goal of having a full-service branch later in the year. I have two other financial points to make before turning the call over to Greg and Michael. The first is on mortgage. Our mortgage team delivered $16.3 million in direct contribution this quarter, which was 71% of our fourth quarter 2020 contribution. Within our previous guidance of 70%-100% of the fourth quarter's adjusted contribution. We generally don't give much guidance, especially with mortgage. We did last quarter because we were confident that we had good insight into the quarter, and that the first quarter would be solid for our mortgage group, both in the retail channel and the consumer direct channel. As it turns out, we were right. As we look into the second quarter and the remainder of the year, our retail mortgage channel continues to look strong. With the increase in interest rates, we've seen a decline in refinance volumes, which has an outsized impact on our consumer direct delivery channel. As a result, the retail channel should have a solid second quarter, but that will be largely or entirely offset by the impact of the declining volumes and margins in consumer direct. The smaller pipeline will cause a negative mark-to-market adjustment on the pipeline that we will absorb in the second quarter. With these headwinds, we aren't expecting a significant, if any, contribution from our mortgage operations in the second quarter. Once we digest the consumer direct volume decrease, we expect more normal operations in the second half of the year, where we would expect mortgages to be in the 10% range of total contribution for any given quarter, depending on seasonality, of course. The second point is on our non-core commercial held-for-sale portfolio. We had offers that were close to acceptable for us, but we ultimately decided we weren't comfortable with the discount that we were being asked to take on the portfolio that we think remains reasonably strong. As long as we continue to hold the portfolio, we're likely to see some small movements in the valuation as we mark that to market each quarter. The third quarter was a $1.9 million gain. The fourth quarter was a $1.4 million gain. The first quarter was an $853,000 loss. We continue to feel appropriately marked on the overall portfolio and believe that we will ultimately dispose of the portfolio in line to ahead of the discount that we have on the loans currently. To summarize, we had a strong financial performance this quarter. Our regional leadership feels good about their growth prospects for the remainder of the year. We added a new Central Alabama region and key relationship managers in the quarter. We face a mortgage headwind in Q2 but feel good about the second half of the year, and we're focused on customer experience and the operational enhancements that allow us to deliver our community banking style no matter our size. Now, Greg is going to give you some additional color on credit. Thanks, Chris. Good morning. Overall, the portfolio continues to perform satisfactorily, and I'm reminded that it was almost exactly a year ago that we gave our first update in the pandemic world. It would be an understatement to say that we've seen a number of changes within our portfolio. Fortunately, due to good general underwriting by our teams, strong relationships, and the strength of our own balance sheet, we've successfully managed through what appears to be the worst of this part of the storm. Those of you that have followed us for the past year will recall that in reaction to the pandemic, we assisted our customers by allowing for some form of payment deferral on approximately 20% of our portfolio. Today, that has been reduced to around 2%, as previously noted and is shown on slide 11. Of that 2% number, the minority, or only $21 million, are remaining on a full deferral of P&I, while the other $131 million in deferral are on an interest payment schedule. Those remaining interest-only deferrals are largely in the hospitality sector, as we pointed out previously. All that to say, we're glad to see how that has progressed. While we're on deferrals, it's a good time to highlight some of the major portfolio categories that we've been tracking, or our industries of concern, as is pointed out in the deck. A year ago, we outlined six primary industry sectors that, based upon what we knew at the time, could potentially be more heavily impacted by the pandemic: retail, hotel, healthcare, restaurant, other leisure, and transportation. As we look back, we are pleased with the overall results from these sectors, especially in the light of the unknowns at the beginning of all this. Slide 12 highlights the overall picture of those industry segments, and you can see that credit quality has held up. Of these, we will call out two segments to highlight this quarter. In the hotel portfolio, with detail broken out on slide 13, our larger operators are reporting improved occupancies, and I believe are optimistic about the future as markets continue to open, the number of vaccinations increase, and travel picks back up. They account for the majority of our exposure. On the smaller, less well-capitalized end of the market, we have seen a few operators not fare as well, and those account for some of the movement in the classified totals. I'm talking only about a few smaller loans. We're hopeful their results improve, but if not, we could see further migration with a couple of these. Again, overall, I'm very pleased with how the hotel portfolio has come through this so far. Second one I'd point out is in the healthcare portfolio, which is detailed on slide 14. We saw a decline initially last year from the closures of the doctor's offices. Again, that picked back up with the reopening of the markets. The exception to this has been in a few of our assisted living homes, which were hit with outbreaks at the beginning of this year, and their occupancies or census counts have been impacted. Excuse me. This has not been indicative of our portfolio overall, but is project specific. At just over $20 million, a couple of these credits account for the rest of the increase in our classified numbers. Our teams are confident that with the increase in vaccinations, these properties will be able to build the occupancy numbers back up, but this could be an extended timeframe that we will be monitoring closely. Slide 15 breaks out the restaurant group as we have done in the past, but results here are good overall and in line with our last report. I'll close with Slide 16, which displays our overall credit metrics. On the whole, we feel comfortable with the health of our loan portfolio. Charge-offs were minimal this quarter at five basis points. Non-performing ratios held relatively steady this quarter. Our classified loans saw a bit of a jump, but that increase is primarily related to the credits that I just discussed, primarily the assisted living. Lastly, we remain comforted by having an allowance toward the upper end of our peers at 2.29%, excluding PPP. With that, I'll turn it over to Michael. Thank you, Greg. Speaking first to mortgage and expanding on some of what Chris spoke to earlier, the team produced another strong quarter in Q1, producing $16.3 million, a seasonal decline from Q4 of 2020, but was within the expected range. As mentioned last quarter, we saw a seasonal dip in margins, which have continued to compress, as illustrated on slide six, with the rise in interest rates. As we have seen in the past, when interest rates rise quickly, the effects on margins and volume impact the consumer direct lenders harder than the traditional retail channels. This is due to the consumer direct channel being more heavily refinance focused than our traditional retail channel. Historically, the consumer direct line of business has been between 55%-65% of our overall volume. We do believe one of the positive outcomes from the pandemic, as it relates to mortgage, has been the shift in consumer behavior and preference to utilize and leverage technology for their mortgage needs. This shift will provide our consumer direct business with continued growth prospects, especially as the team works to gain additional market share in the purchase space. We have seen successful strides in April to move in that direction, but as in any business model, shifts takes time to fully implement, and we will continue to take advantage of the refinance business as long as it exists. We do expect a solid purchase season, but the mortgage industry as a whole is facing its share of headwinds, including excess industry capacity and national and local housing shortages. Moving on to net interest margin. We saw a decline in the headline number as our liquidity has continued to build. Adjusted for normalized liquidity levels, the margin held relatively flat around 3.41%, compared to 3.44% last quarter, and that detail is on slide five in the impact of excess liquidity line. We are still focused on bringing deposit costs down, and we were able to do that this quarter, as cost of total deposits came down five basis points, while contractual yield on loans, excluding PPP loans, also came down five basis points. This trend is poised to continue as we have over $300 million of CDs repricing again this quarter in the 1.25% range. We also continue to see progress on reducing our money market and interest-bearing checking rates, as we've been picking up a basis point or so per week on the cost of those deposits recently. Liquidity is likely to continue to weigh on the margin, and we would obviously like to redeploy that cash into core lending relationships. With the competitive environment and with liquidity continuing to flood into the system, we have ramped up our securities purchases. We've previously held off on investing too much in the securities portfolio, given the low rates and duration risk that were evident in our investment opportunities. However, with the recent uptick in rates, we've added $112 million to our portfolio in April at about 150 basis point yield, which is a nice short-term pickup compared to the 12 basis points that we're earning on our cash. We will look to move our portfolio to approximately 12%-13% of total assets. Moving on to CECL and our allowance, we saw a release of $13.9 million this quarter as economic forecasts continue to improve. As we had mentioned previously, we have been fairly model-driven with limited qualitative factors to this point. However, the initial release based on our chosen Moody's forecast this quarter was larger than we felt was prudent, given that the economic recovery is in its early stages and we're still facing headwinds. With that, we increased our qualitative factors this quarter in order to account for some of the uncertainty. Going forward, we will continue to weigh the improving forecasts versus Q-factors that we believe are prudent to manage the allowance. However, we would currently expect further releases over the next few quarters, assuming outlooks continue to improve. I'll close my section by speaking to our expenses. The banking segment non-interest expense was a bit higher this quarter at $55.7 million, which excluding $4.5 million in FHLB prepayment penalties, compares to $52.9 million in the fourth quarter. This was related to some seasonal and one-time expenses and not a run rate to base future estimates on. Between the seasonal expenses related to the annual incentive compensation payout and a few other one-time items, we're about $1.7 million higher this quarter than what we feel like our run rate is. We continue to expect low- to mid-single-digit percentage growth rate for 2021 and our annualized run rate from the fourth quarter, which would have been about $212 million. I'll now turn things back over to Chris to close. Okay. Thank you, Greg, and thank you, Michael, for that color. Thank you, everyone, again, for your interest in our company. Operator, we would like to open the line for questions at this point. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question comes from Catherine Mealor of KBW. Catherine, please proceed. Hi, good morning. Morning, Catherine. Morning, Catherine. I just wanted to first follow up on your expense guide that you just gave. You're saying we should take about $1.7 million out of this run rate from this quarter and then grow it at kind of a low single-digit pace from there. Is that right? Yeah, that low to mid, right. Low to mid. Yeah, low to mid single-digit pace. Low to mid. Okay, great. Are you basically through all of your cost savings from the merger? How we kind of think about further cost savings kind of offset by just growth and investments in the franchise and hiring and technology investments and all that? Yeah. Two couple of things. We hit the goals in terms of cost savings, but we still have a few things that will come out later in the year, primarily in the form of some comp-related expenses and some leases. Michael, is there anything else that can come out? No, I think that's fair. I think we've seen some improvement in real estate. It's improved the lease outlook. Yeah, a good point. We have some dormant branches, and our markets or the real estate market is such that the prospects for those were better than when we initially took them in, and so we're probably going to be able to get rid of some of those. Okay, great. My follow-up is just on the loan growth. It's great that you are forecasting to return to the mid to high single digit on the back half of the year. Can you just kind of talk about what your pipeline looks like and just kind of the health of your markets and then the risk of accelerated paydowns that you may see that may kind of eat into that growth? Thanks. Yeah. I think your question, actually, I could probably formulate into a pretty good answer. In my comments, I made the note that we were a little concerned in February because we were down significantly in loan balances, and then we had a really strong March. If you look at our averages, they would reflect that. As we continue to look forward, we've got good demand, we are seeing the pipeline actually look quite good. We're also seeing paydowns because obviously it's been a pretty good time to refinance. It's been a good time to refinance, actually, it's a good time, especially for some not-for-profits and others to pay off. We're seeing where some, both individuals, companies, and not-for-profits, just eliminating their debt altogether. Good for them, by the way. Not so good if you're the lender on a really solid credit. As we try to project that, I would tell you it's not easy. When we look at the pipeline today, it still feels pretty good as we try to roll the year forward for mid to high single digits when we take all those things into account. We are seeing it bounce around a lot. I would say, actually, we saw a really strong March. We've seen a weaker April, but if we look at the pipeline, again, it gets a little stronger in the latter part of the quarter. By the way, if you sit in my seat, that means you're a little nervous always, when it comes in at the later versus earlier in the year. So far, our folks have been right on target with what they've been projecting. Great. That's really helpful. Thank you so much. Thanks, Catherine. Our next question comes from Stephen Scouten of Piper Sandler. Stephen, please proceed. Thanks. Good morning, everyone. Good morning, Stephen. I wanted to just see if you could give some additional color on that Birmingham team, maybe what size bank they're coming from, if there's any sort of specialty focus for that team, or if they're just standard kind of core commercial bankers. What your maybe longer-term vision is for that market, and if you think that would entail M&A or just other team lookouts, or kind of how you think about the growth there longer term. Yeah. Thanks, Stephen. A couple of things. I'd say folks are coming not from a single institution down there. We've had actually probably two or three different contributors, and that continues to be the case. They do have some experience, but it's a variety of types of banks of folks that we have been able to acquire. Remember that we do have some folks in the market that are very experienced in the market. We're already in Huntsville and Florence, and so again, we've got contacts there. I'd say it's fairly normal in terms of just word spreading and us getting some opportunities on how we're picking folks up. I'd say we're certainly not targeting any institution or anything like that. It just, fortune shined on us there. What was the second part of the question? Growth plan, what's the vision for? Yeah, I'm sorry. In terms of just total down there, yes. Any market that we enter like that, we take a very long-term vision and approach to it. We enter that thinking about how can we be the leading bank in that market over a decade or so. We're thinking of all of the above. We would think about acquisitions, straight up acquisitions of a bank. We think about a branch deal. If the right kind of branch deal popped up, we'd think about. We're trying to acquire leading bankers in the market. All of those would be a part of our strategy. If you go back and look at how we've approached Nashville, and how we've approached Chattanooga, and how we've approached Knoxville, that's the way we go into each market, is with a long-term intent to be one of the dominant banks in the market. We'll utilize all those things to be able to achieve that over a longer period of time. Great. That makes sense. Thanks, Chris. Then maybe if you guys could talk to the NIM a little bit. I know liquidity makes it almost impossible to kind of forecast. Maybe if we thought about it, X the incremental liquidity and kind of thought about what you think you're seeing on new loan yields and incremental pressure on loan yields. They were, I think, relatively stable ex PPP this quarter. Then kind of, I guess, if you think you'll see incremental investments in the securities. I know you said kind of 12%-13% of assets, but kind of how you think about that balance of keeping the liquidity versus investing it and taking duration risk, et cetera. Stephen, that's a great point. I don't think if you talked to us at the beginning of the quarter, we would've expected that 35% annualized deposit growth. That liquidity went on us and others certainly. We are seeing loans pay off right at kind of higher yields. It was about 4.46% in the month of March. Coming in at high 3%, low 4% range new production. You do see a basis point or so every month of lower loan yields. That's what we were trying to get at on lowering our deposit costs, right? We look to offset that decrease in loan yields to stabilize NIM. We certainly have started to pick up our securities purchases. Opportunity arose as rates moved up late March, early April. You saw the 10-year go up 70 to 80 basis points, and it's settled back in a little bit. Got a lot more comfortable. Obviously, we'd like to deploy that excess liquidity into the loan growth Chris was just talking about. As we said, 150 basis points on the investment portfolio feels a lot better than 12 basis points on cash. We'll continue to make investments as prudent, but realizing we prefer to invest in that longer-term loan growth and relationships. Hey, Stephen, I'll just add this. It really is an unusual time when margin is one of our most key metrics, and it's hard to use that as a judgment of success right now because liquidity is so abundant. We tell our folks, basically any dollar of funding we take in, if we're paying more than 12 basis points on it, that's a loss for us. By the way, we took in $800 million in the first quarter. The margin, if you just look, I look at about three things. One, just the yield on the loan portfolio, which is holding in pretty reasonably well. I look at deposit costs, which will continue to decrease. There, I think we've got some optimism as we move forward. The other thing I look at is just the raw net interest income number. It was down quarter-over-quarter, which is disappointing for me and disappointing for us. That's one that we'll be focused on just to try to get as much out of that liquidity as we can. Got it. Then maybe just one last thing for me. I'm curious, we've seen some slight uptick back in the refi application numbers as the 10-year moved back down these mid-150 range. If you think there could be some improvement throughout the quarter, and just to confirm, you said those fair value marks might make the contribution for 2Q relatively neutral or close to zero. Did I hear that correctly? Yeah, you did hear that correctly. Yes, I also threw a sentence in there before and said, man, we're always giving guidance on mortgage is really a tough thing. When you have the pipeline that we have, remember, our mortgage business is obviously robust, and we've had five quarters of 100. If we roll the last five quarters, we had about $120 million of contribution, which is fantastic from a capital account standpoint. That also means our pipeline is large. When you have a movement in that pipeline like we will have in the second quarter as we do less in our consumer direct business, just that mark-to-market can be substantial. If you remember, our margins related to mark-to-market were really large on the way up as we grew the pipeline. As you end up shrinking the pipeline when volumes decrease, you've got the other side of that. It's a short-term phenomenon, but yes, you're just right. It could lead to just a second quarter, I guess, Michael, I'll call it an anomaly. We've got a second quarter phenomenon where when we shrink the pipeline, that mark-to-market will be a negative force. Yeah. Stephen, I think your refinance question with the move down in rates, I think there could be some opportunity there. Keep in mind, the industry spent the last year building capacity. Now Chris has touched on margins decreasing. Even if that increase in refinance, you've got people fighting for less business because we're still down substantially from a refinance perspective over the last year as an industry over the last six weeks. We hope you're right. The realism in us says, let's don't count on it. Yeah. No, that's fair. It helped you grow what, tangible book 23% year-over-year, so I think you'll take it. Congrats, guys. Appreciate it. Yeah. You're right. You're exactly right. We'll take it. Our next question comes from Jennifer Demba of Truist Securities. Jennifer, please proceed. Thank you. Good morning. Good morning, Jennifer. Can you just talk about interest in other hires and other markets in the Southeast that you may be targeting? We're seeing, obviously, a lot of acquisitions being announced in the last several weeks. Can you talk about interest as it stands right now? Sure. On other hires, very interested in seasoned relationship managers in other markets. That's something that will be our recruiting efforts. I would say 2020 was a tough year in a lot of ways. Remember, we grew from $6.1 million to today, $12 billion. We were focused on a lot of conversion, a lot of things with our business model, a lot of risk management as we have grown the company. We probably haven't done as much of that. That is a focus for us this year to continue to be able to add folks. You'll see that throughout the year as we add some relationship managers in each of our markets and in different all shapes and sizes, I guess, is the way I'd put it, including mortgage bankers as well as commercial bankers. On the M&A front, we're always interested, is the way I would put it. We also, going back to just what I just mentioned, we have been really focused internally on the business model, on the customer experience, on making sure that we're beating our competitors every day on the street. When we talk about being a good operator, that's what we really mean. Again, with as much as we've grown, that's really our focus. We get some calls, but frankly, on most of them, we're saying we've got other things on our mind, and we think that's where we're going to get the biggest dividend in the immediate future. We never say never, but that's really not where our pursuit from a strategic standpoint is today. Thank you. As a reminder, if you have a question, please press star then one. Our next question is going to come from Matt Olney of Stephens Inc.. Matt, please proceed. Hey, thank you, and good morning. Wanted to ask about the impact of higher interest rates potentially next few years on the company. Saw the disclosures in the 10-K from December. I don't know if there's a new disclosure I missed last night. I guess the shock analysis suggests that the bank is one of the more asset-sensitive banks in the peer group. Would love to hear kind of what the drivers are and your expectations of higher rates, impact of loan floors and excess liquidity. Thanks. Hey, Matt. Good morning. Yeah, we feel pretty good about a rising rate scenario, especially on the short end of the curve. We're about 50% variable in our loan portfolio, we will see a nice pickup in NIM and interest income as rates rise. Yeah, that disclosure that you're referencing is indicative of some of our optimism. As Chris mentioned, NIM being a key metric for us. Because we're asset sensitive, we obviously perform pretty well in that environment. If we can get some inflation, we can get short-term rates to rise, we think we're well-positioned with the way the balance sheet is structured. Obviously, it puts a little bit of pressure on some other pieces, our refi mortgage, but it's more than offset in the balance sheet. Just as a follow-up, what about loan floors behind that? Would it take a few short-term rate increases before you actually see a benefit because of those loan floors? Yeah, we get some increasing benefit with each increment. We'd get a small benefit from the earlier stages of the increases. I'd have to look exactly at the chart, we'd get some benefit from the earlier incremental rate increases. Okay. Just follow up, I mean. Okay. I would say this. Thanks on the question and good to talk to you. I would say this. We actually got benefit from that mortgage, and I talked about that it's been $120 million over the last five quarters. As rates go down, the way we try to build it is we get that benefit because our margin's getting squeezed. We think we're positioned well on the NIM and on our core banking business. As rates go up, you will see, just like we talked about for Q2, you'll see some challenge in, especially in that consumer direct piece of the mortgage market because it's so rate sensitive. That's part of the plan, and we think when we put them both together, it makes for a really good shareholder value kind of proposition. All right. As a final reminder, if you have a question, please press star then one. Our next question is going to come from Alex Lau of JPMorgan. Alex, please proceed. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Yeah. Can you talk about the growth in public fund deposits in terms of size and also what you expect in terms of seasonal impact as these run off? Thank you. Yeah. On the growth in public fund deposits, we think just about the vast majority of our public funds would be sort of centralized operating type accounts. And those wants to fund up in the first quarter every year. We're accustomed to seeing money come in in the first quarter and a big increase in those balances. If we looked at the increase in the first quarter, a majority of that would be driven by public funds accounts that are existing accounts that are simply funding up in the quarter. It'd actually be a fairly significant majority. That will come down in the second quarter and probably throughout the quarter and maybe even a little bit into the third. That's a routine occurrence for us. Well, I'll just layer on. There's a lot of money in the system that's flowing to the governments. We're supporting our communities and municipalities. That creates a little bit of volatility in that number increase because how much money is flowing into governments across our major municipalities there. Does that answer your question, Alex? That does. Thank you. On your allowance for credit loss ratio, with the combination with Franklin, do you have an ACL ratio for day one CECL? I am just trying to get a sense of what a normal ratio would be as you release more reserves. Alex, the day one CECL is not as pertinent to us because of what you just mentioned. We don't necessarily have a target that we're looking to return to. We're going through the process on a monthly, quarterly basis, looking at obviously loan growth, new loan balance sheet changes, and adjusting accordingly with the model and then based on what the outlook looks like for the economy. I know that's not a direct number, but that's kind of how we think about it. Yeah. I would just add that, as you can see, obviously, we're maybe at the top of our peer group, probably. If we're not at the very top, we're certainly in the top decile. We understand that's why we also have been approached it in both a prudent way. CECL is obviously this first year of adoption, we feel like we've approached it prudently. We try to approach most things conservatively because we're a bank, we think we approach that conservatively as well. You've heard us say pretty openly, if things continue to improve, we would likely see releases, at least in the near term, on some of that. How much that is or what that would look like, we take it quarter by quarter, as opposed to having any certain target that we're aiming for. In our understanding of CECL, I don't think that's what CECL calls for. Appreciate that. Lastly, with your focus inward on customer experience to compete with other banks and fintechs, does this require any additional investments in terms of technology that would be noticeable? Thanks. Yeah. Technology, in our way of thinking, is a constant investment. We're making some investment in technology every quarter, for us, it's trying to plan it. It's trying to be routine about it. We have done a couple things on the technology front that we feel keeps us on the front line in terms of what's emerging and what's happening and keeps us sharp in thinking about that customer experience. We were an early investor back a few years back in a local FinTech fund called FINTOP that's managed by a friend of ours. When I said we are a local investor, we were an investor. That is actually misstated. I guess I'd say a very large shareholder of ours was a personal investor. Because of that, we were able to get a lot of insight into their investments, what they're looking at. We have since made an investment in a fund, a small investment in a fund that is a FinTech focus. Again, we will sit on an advisory board there. With Jack Henry, our core processor, we're on their highest level advisory board, again, where we're constantly evaluating and monitoring on the technology front. Wrapping all that into what we're doing is wrapping that into the customer experience focus and project that we have going on so that we're in a position to continue to make sure that we are leading our competitors when it comes to that customer experience. That's great color. Thanks for taking my question. Thanks, Alex. Thanks, Alex. This concludes the question and answer session. At this time, I would like to turn it back to Chris Holmes for any closing remarks. Okay. Thanks, everybody. That wraps up Q1. We're almost a third of the way through Q2 at this point. We will look forward to being back on with you at the end of next quarter, at this quarter now, if not before. Thanks, everybody. Have a great day. This concludes the conference. You are now free to disconnect at this time. Thank you. Have a great day.