Great. Good morning. Welcome to the FTI Consulting conference call to discuss the company's first quarter 2023 earnings results as reported this morning. Management will begin with formal remarks, after which they will take your questions. Before we begin, I would like to remind everyone that this conference call may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 that involve risks and uncertainties. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning plans, objectives, goals, strategies, future events, future revenues, future results and performance, expectations, plans or intentions relating to financial performance, acquisitions, share repurchases, business trends, ESG-related matters, and other information or other matters that are not historical, including statements regarding estimates of our future financial results and other matters. For a discussion of risks and other factors that may cause actual results or events to differ from those contemplated by forward-looking statements, investors should review the safe harbor statement in the earnings press release issued this morning, a copy of which is available on our website at www.fticonsulting.com, as well as other disclosures under the headings of Risk Factors and Forward-Looking Information in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31st, 2023, our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31st, 2022, and in our other filings with the SEC. Investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only the date of this earnings call and will not be updated. During the call, we will discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as total segment operating income, adjusted EBITDA, total adjusted segment EBITDA, adjusted earnings per diluted share, adjusted net income, adjusted EBITDA margin, and free cash flow. For a discussion of these and other non-GAAP financial measures, as well as our reconciliations of non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, investors should review the press release and the accompanying financial tables that we issued this morning, which include the reconciliations. Lastly, there are two items that have been posted to the Investor Relations section of our website for your reference. These include a quarterly earnings presentation and an Excel and PDF of our historical, financial, and operating data, which have been updated to include our first quarter 2023 results. Of note, during today's prepared remarks, management will not speak directly to the quarterly earnings presentation posted to the Investor Relations section of our website. To ensure our disclosures are consistent, these slides provide the same details as they have historically, and as I've said, are available on the Investor Relations section of our website. With those formalities out of the way, I'm joined today by Steven Gunby, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Ajay Sabherwal, our Chief Financial Officer. At this time, I'll turn the call over to our President and Chief Executive Officer, Steve Gunby. Thank you, Mollie. Welcome, everyone, and thank you all for joining us this morning. I am pleased to say that we reported record revenues yet again this quarter. In fact, we reported double-digit revenue growth year-over-year once again. As Ajay will talk about, that level of revenue growth was despite the fact that we had FX headwinds this quarter, and we had some revenue deferrals. Disaggregating that revenue performance, each of our segments, once again, grew year-over-year. Strat-Comm's revenues grew mid-single digits despite some significant FX headwinds. Econ, for reasons I'll describe later, only reported modest revenue growth. All of the rest of our segments' revenues grew at double-digit levels, and when you adjust for FX headwinds, strong double-digit levels. Below that sort of terrific revenue story, as you might imagine, are enormous numbers of success stories. I'm gonna leave it to Ajay to share some of them, and if you'd like some further details or elaboration, we can go into more depth during the Q&A. Today I wanna move from the revenue story to the bottom-line story. Notwithstanding that strong top-line performance, our bottom line, in fact, underperformed our expectations this quarter and did so substantially. Ajay will discuss the reasons for those shortfalls in some depth, but I'd like to give you a few of the top-level reasons. First, let me come back to Econ. Our Econ business, as I think everybody on this call knows, is an incredibly powerful business that has for many years delivered strong results for our shareholders and at least as importantly for our clients. We've averaged about 15% average annual adjusted EBITDA margins in that business for the last many, many years, at least 10%. For a number of factors, including some slowness in parts in the business in the beginning of the year, some revenue deferrals, a few other things, we happen to deliver an 8% EBITDA, adjusted EBITDA margin this quarter. As we will discuss later, we do not expect adjusted EBITDA margins in Econ to remain at that level for the rest of the year. The second factor is one that we've talked about a lot in the past. In any given quarter, there are a lot of factors that can happen to cut one way or another. We have cellphones. Do you mind grabbing that and taking it out? Thank you. Lest anybody think that's somebody on my team's fault, that was my cell phone that went off. The second factor, as we've talked about a lot in the past is one that we've talked about a lot in the past. In any given quarter, there are a lot of factors that can happen to cut one way or another, like FX transaction losses or the timing of marketing or client events or the amount of bad debt in a quarter. This quarter, those items happened in total to cut more negatively than they often do. I want to spend some time, though, on the third reason, which is different. As high as our revenue growth was this quarter, we actually staffed ourselves up in terms of billable and non-billable headcount and the compensation associated with that for an even higher level of revenue growth than we delivered. That resulted in expense growth that actually exceeded those terrific revenue growth. Let me talk about that and how that happened, because it's not totally random. In a few places, it is a little random. It's the sort of thing that happens every quarter. You can't predict exactly how much revenue growth you'll have in any particular area around the world. This quarter, we had revenue growth shortfalls in parts of Strat-Comm, our health solutions business with an FLC and some of our businesses in EMEA and Asia Pacific. That is pretty typical. It happens every quarter some places. You can't ever predict exactly where. We don't consider any of that part of a long-term trend, just normal quarter-to-quarter variations. More systemically, this quarter, our employee turnover was lower than in recent quarters. Even though we expected it to be lower, it was even a bit lower than we expected. On top of those factors, however, we also had something else important happen, which is that we continued to find terrific talent looking to join us, and we took advantage of that in multiple key markets, including the Middle East, Australia, Hong Kong, Continental Europe, and elsewhere. To support the businesses we're building in those jurisdictions and elsewhere, we continued to add non-billable headcount. Though we had record revenues, we actually staffed ourselves up for an even higher level of revenue growth than we delivered. As Ajay will discuss, we do expect that gap between expense growth and revenue growth to gradually normalize as the year goes on. Let me talk to something important, a point that I find very important. When I look at the bases for the bottom line shortfall this quarter, they do not give me pause in any way with respect to my confidence about the powerful future of this company or even my outlook for the year. FX issues cut against us some quarters, but typically not all. In some quarters, they go the other way. Revenue deferrals, we typically get recognized. If attrition continues to be lower, we can gently reduce our hiring. Of course, we can moderate our non-billable headcount growth to match the billable headcount growth. The important point is, though, the bottom line is not what we wanted this quarter or we'd ideally want in any quarter, the shortfall is not the result of us being unable to grow revenues or that the majority of the bets that we've been making suddenly stopped working. Rather, we had strong top-level growth and a series of things this quarter that happened to hit us negatively, coupled with a series of things we chose to do because we believe they will allow us to continue to build a fundamentally more attractive enterprise over time. Before I close, let me focus a little bit more on that choice part of the prior sentence. Is it possible that we continue to have great talent looking to defect to us and we decide to invest ahead of demand? That is always a possibility. To me, that would be a great thing. If we took advantage of it, could it hurt quarters? Of course, it could. As those of you who have been following this company for years now know, it's been by making those sorts of bets that we've been able to get this company on the terrific multi-year trajectory we've been on now for almost a decade. We have hired some of the best people in this firm, people who have helped transform our businesses in quarters when the businesses they joined were slow. We've talked about some of those examples over time. I know a reasonable amount of the talent that has joined us this quarter, and for those I know, I must say I'm extraordinarily excited about them joining us, and I am excited about the professionals that I'm hearing right now want to join this company. Mollie slipped in some data into my script. Apparently, during this first quarter, I knew we were hiring some great people. Apparently, we know announced 44 senior hires this quarter. 44 combination of SMDs and MDs, which I think is unprecedented for our first quarter. Let me reiterate to me the most important point. None of the issues this quarter give me pause about our multi-year trajectory or even this year. Quarterly results in this business and our company can always be volatile, and I don't ask management here to focus on reducing that volatility. I ask them to focus on building powerful, sustainable growth engines, not one that will never be impacted by short-term volatility, but one that can demonstrate over time that powerful multi-year trajectory. To do that by having our teams focus on client needs, making bold bets where the needs are great and where we believe we have a right to win, and ensuring that every day we attract, develop, and promote great professionals who can deliver on those needs, and we support them as they build those businesses. I believe we have now shown that when we maintain that commitment and focus over any extended period of time, our business soars. Our people develop and they soar. I so look forward to us continuing on that journey. With that, let me turn this over to Ajay for some details on the quarter. Ajay? Thank you, Steve. Good morning, everybody. In my prepared remarks, I will take you through our company-wide and segment results and discuss guidance for the full year. As Steve mentioned, today, we reported yet another quarter of record revenues with all of our segments growing year-over-year. Of note, restructuring activity strengthened in the quarter. In fact, according to S&P Global, in the U.S. through March, monthly bankruptcies have increased sequentially for four consecutive months. Conversely, the pace of M&A-related services in several of our segments was slower than we anticipated. Bloomberg reported that global quarterly deal volume declined nearly 50% year-over-year in Q1 2023, making it the third lowest quarter for M&A in the last 10 years. Strong revenue growth did not sufficiently offset the increase in direct costs, SG&A, FX transaction losses, and a higher tax rate compared to the prior year quarter. As a result, EPS and adjusted EBITDA declined year-over-year. Overall, our first quarter results were below our expectations. Turning to the details for the quarter. First quarter of 2023 revenues of $806.7 million were up $83.1 million or 11.5% year-over-year. Excluding the estimated negative impact of FX, revenues increased $99.7 million or 13.8%. Earnings per share of $1.34 compared to $1.66 in the prior year quarter. Net income of $47.5 million compared to $59.3 million in the prior year quarter. The decrease in net income was primarily due to an increase in compensation, including the impact of an 11% increase in billable headcount, higher SG&A expenses, and FX remeasurement losses. SG&A of $184.2 million was 22.8% of revenues and compares to SG&A of $149 million or 20.6% of revenues in the first quarter of 2022. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to higher compensation, which included a 14.4% increase in non-billable headcount, increased travel and entertainment expenses, and higher bad debt. First quarter 2023 adjusted EBITDA of $78.4 million decreased 13.3% compared to $90.5 million in the prior year quarter. Our first quarter 2023 effective tax rate of 24% compared to 22.2% in the prior year quarter. The higher tax rate this quarter was primarily due to an increase in foreign taxes and a lower discrete tax adjustment related to share-based compensation from fewer shares vesting. For the balance of 2023, we continue to expect our effective tax rate to be between 24% and 26%. Weighted average shares outstanding or WASO for Q1 of 35.5 million shares compared to 35.6 million shares in the prior year quarter. For the quarter, our convertible notes had a potential dilutive impact on EPS of approximately 1.3 million shares in WASO, as our share price on average of $173.80 this past quarter was above the $101.38 conversion threshold. Billable headcount increased by 614 professionals or 11% year-over-year. Sequentially, billable headcount increased by 123 professionals or 2%. Non-billable headcount increased by 14.4% year-over-year. We added non-billable employees to support a larger business, especially outside of North America, in areas such as recruiting, HR, finance, and marketing. Sequentially, non-billable headcount increased by 36 professionals or 2.3%. Now turning to our performance at the segment level. In Corporate Finance & Restructuring, record revenues of $300 million increased 18.4% compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher demand for restructuring and business transformation services, which was partially offset by lower demand for transactions services. Business transformation and transactions represented 53% of segment revenues, while restructuring represented 47% of segment revenues in the quarter. This compares to a split of 59% for business transformation and transactions and 41% for restructuring in the prior year quarter. Year-over-year, restructuring revenues grew 38% as we successfully helped clients in a variety of verticals, including retail, healthcare, financial institutions, and airlines. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $55 million or 18.3% of segment revenues, compared to $53.5 million or 21.1% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The increase in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues, which was partially offset by higher compensation, which includes the impact of a 13.9% increase in billable headcount and higher SG&A expenses, including increased business development activity. Turning to Forensic and Litigation Consulting or FLC. Revenues of $173.4 million increased 12.7% compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher demand for data and analytics, investigations, and health solution services. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $18.6 million or 10.7% of segment revenues, compared to $17.3 million or 11.2% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The increase in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues, which was partially offset by an increase in compensation, which includes the impact of a 4.2% increase in billable headcount, as well as an increase in as-needed outside contractors expenses and higher SG&A expenses. In Economic Consulting, revenues of $169.6 million increased 2.2% compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher demand for M&A related antitrust services and higher realization for non-M&A related antitrust services, which was partially offset by lower demand for non-M&A related antitrust services. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $14.2 million or 8.4% of segment revenues compared to $21.2 million or 12.8% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The decrease in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher compensation, which includes the impact of an 8.5% increase in billable headcount and higher SG&A expenses. We had expected higher revenues and adjusted segment EBITDA in Economic Consulting. This is in part due to revenue deferrals that have resulted in and may continue to result in variations in the timing of revenue recognized on work already performed. We believe that conditions to recognize these revenues will be met later this year and could positively impact adjusted segment EBITDA by approximately $5 million. Technology's revenues of $90.6 million increased 12.6% compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher demand for investigations and litigation services, which was partially offset by lower demand for information governance, privacy, and security services. adjusted segment EBITDA of $15.4 million or 17% of segment revenues compared to $13.4 million or 16.6% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The increase in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to higher revenues, which was partially offset by higher SG&A expenses and an increase in compensation, which includes the impact of a 17.1% increase in billable headcount. Strategic Communications revenues of $73.1 million increased 4.5% compared to the prior year quarter. The increase in revenues was primarily due to higher demand for corporate reputation services. Particularly supporting crisis communications and cybersecurity-related engagements. Adjusted segment EBITDA of $9.6 million or 13.1% of segment revenues compared to $15.7 million or 22.5% of segment revenues in the prior year quarter. The decrease in adjusted segment EBITDA was primarily due to lower gross margin resulting from higher compensation, which includes the impact of a 16.2% increase in billable headcount. That and an increase in SG&A expenses more than offset the increase in revenues. Let me now discuss a few cash flow and balance sheet items. As is typical, we pay the bulk of our annual bonuses in the first quarter. Net cash used in operating activities of $254.2 million compared to $203.8 million in the prior year quarter. The year-over-year increase in net cash used in operating activities was primarily due to an increase in salaries, largely related to headcount growth, higher operating expenses, and an increase in annual bonus payments, which was partially offset by an increase in cash collections. During the quarter, we spent $17.8 million to repurchase 112,139 shares at an average price per share of $158.70. As of the end of the quarter, approximately $460.7 million remained available for stock repurchases under our current stock repurchase authorization. Total debt net of cash of $122.7 million at March 31st, 2023, compared to $60.1 million at March 31st, 2022, and negative $175.5 million at December 31st, 2022. The sequential increase in total debt net of cash was primarily due to an increase in cash used in operating activities, which included annual bonus payments. Turning to guidance. As is typical, we will reevaluate guidance once we have another quarter under our belt at the end of the second quarter to see if any changes are warranted. Despite the weaker than expected results in Q1, we are not changing our guidance. Our expectations for the year are shaped by several assumptions, including the following. First, restructuring activity continues to strengthen both in the United States and overseas, which was reflected in a 6% sequential increase in restructuring revenues compared to 4Q 2022. Second, while we expect M&A activity in 2023 to remain slower than in 2022, we expect a pickup from the near record low levels seen in Q1 over the coming quarters, which would positively impact our Economic Consulting and Technology segments and our transactions business in Corporate Finance. Third, we expect to recognize certain revenue deferrals in Economic Consulting in the coming quarters. Fourth, we expect momentum to continue to build in our Forensic and Litigation Consulting business. Finally, we expect SG&A expenses in each quarter for the balance of the year to remain at a level similar to SG&A in Q1. We expect non-billable headcount growth, which exceeded both billable headcount growth and revenue growth in Q1 to be lower in the second half of the year. Before I close, I want to reiterate three themes that I believe underscore the attractiveness of our business. First, we are focused on the duality of growing the business for the long term while also being mindful of utilization. Second, our strong balance sheet allows us the flexibility to continue to boost shareholder value through organic headcount growth, share buybacks and acquisitions when we see the right ones. And third, we have demonstrated our ability to generate strong revenue growth in any cycle. We believe we are the strongest provider of restructuring and antitrust services anywhere in the world. We continue to grow those businesses while also growing many other practices including business transformation, ESG, cybersecurity, Technology with key capabilities in digital assets and emerging data and crisis communications globally. With that, let's open the call up for your questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question comes from Andrew Nicholas with William Blair. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Morning, Andrew. I wanted to just start with the restructuring environment. Sounds like, you know, you're pleased with the sequential step-up in revenue quarter-over-quarter. Seems like you're seeing some strength both in the U.S. and overseas. I was hoping you could just spend a little bit more time talking about how that's developed and maybe how you're thinking about that business over the next several quarters or years relative to maybe how you were thinking about it a couple months back. Andrew, no question, restructuring is picking up both in the U.S. and overseas, in places like Australia, Germany, U.K., it is picking up. We said explicitly that in our prepared remarks and guidance. What is difficult to project is exactly the slope of that line. That's why there's a range when we talk about our guidance, there is definitely a pickup. Understood. I think, Steve, you mentioned in your prepared remarks that there's a combination of factors that cut negatively in the quarter. I know, Ajay, you called out the revenue deferral and Economic Consulting. Were there any other kind of timing items that were sizable that you'd call out that kinda make it a combination of factors, or was that the only one that we should be cognizant of as we think about potential reversals as we move through the rest of this year? Yeah. In terms of reversals, I'll see if Ajay thinks of anything else. I mean, I don't know of reversals. I think the other factors that sometimes happen in any quarter is, you know, some factors cut one way or another any quarter, like FX, bad debt, I mean, we, you know, the amount of bad debt. I think, you know, in some quarters, we have higher than we expect in bad debt, and some quarters we have lower. Some quarters, the FX cuts in our favor, sometimes quarters it cuts against us. It sometimes seems like whenever we're having a bad quarter for something else, all the factors, the short-term factors also cut negatively. I'm not sure that's not the case, it just feels that way. This quarter, we had some of those cut negative also. You can't be sure they're gonna reverse, you can't be sure that FX is gonna reverse as the year goes on. We have never seen a correlation that says 'cause it was bad in the first quarter, it's gonna be bad in the second. Does that respond, Andrew? Yeah. No, absolutely. If I could just, kind of squeeze one more question in just to clarify on your, Ajay, your comments on SG&A. Should we expect SG&A to be at a similar level to Q1 in absolute dollar terms, or is that in terms of revenue percentage? Absolute dollar terms. Great. Thank you very much. The next question is from James Yaro with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Just start with Corporate Finance & Restructuring, and specifically in terms of the business transformation and transactions sub-segment. In that sub-segment, despite the weaker macro backdrop, it was still up very slightly quarter-on-quarter, which is obviously a positive. I'm just trying to understand within that sub-segment, the two businesses, how they would perform in a potential recession scenario? I guess the two questions are, how do we think about transactions performance in a weaker M&A backdrop? On the business transformation side, should that be adversely impacted by a pullback in spending by corporates and sponsors if we do enter a recession? Do you think you could outgrow any adverse effects through headcount growth over time? Here's the facts. You know, combined business transformation and transactions grew 5.5% year-over-year. In that, transactions was actually down 8% year-over-year. Business transformation, even in this cycle, grew for us. We're small relative to the business transformation market out there or the, you know, the whole industry out there. I think there is enormous scope for us to continue to grow business transformation despite cycles. The transaction side is, you know, cyclical, and we experience the same. Okay. That's very clear. maybe you could just speak to the crypto revenue opportunity you see across your business. Within which segments do you see the opportunity, and where are you investing in that? Yeah. Look, I mean, it's obviously a dynamic space, and we have, in fact, a number of our segments have opportunities in that. I mean, obviously, there's been bankruptcies in crypto, there's litigation in crypto. You know, litigation can make a difference for in multiple of our segments. You know, Technology can get involved in e-discovery. You can end up with investigations. If there's litigation, you can end up with disputes and expert witnesses. It's obviously an area that we have focused on. I think, you know, I don't think we specifically talk about individual cases, but we're making serious progress. Does that respond? Absolutely. Thank you so much. I just had one other one, which is just on the hiring opportunity. You've obviously continued to conduct robust hiring, especially outside of the U.S., as you alluded to before. Maybe you could just speak to why the opportunity has remained so, you know, robust, and why you're seeing such high-quality talent shaking loose, and whether what's happening with the Big Four consulting firms has anything to do with that. Yeah, you know, I think it has some of it has to do with us, and then some of it has to do with the rest of the world. I think, you know, one of the things that has changed in the last seven, eight years is we now are being seen as a winning player multiple places around the globe. I would say that, you know, although we had good people in Australia, we were not seen as the winning player. You know, you could say that's true for many places in continental Europe. We had a good, strong practice in London, but we weren't seen as a real player in many places in Europe. That has changed. That has changed. That just. You know, people like to be part of a winning team. As you globalize some U.S. businesses, you can now win the most important global assignments, which the best practitioners wanna be part of. I mean, 15 years ago, I think one of the Big Four won the bulk of Lehman Brothers work. You know, we won. I don't guess we name names even though they're public. You know, two of the biggest global bankruptcy cases in the last five years, you know. People like working on the name cases and so forth. We've changed our position in multiple places around the world. The second issue is there are dislocations in competitors, you know, in, around the world. You know, often it's very hard to get the best people to leave their firms. When there's a disruption, people look around. I think 10 years ago, when there was disruptions many places around, they weren't looking at us. Today, a lot of people are looking at us. The other thing I would say that's happened is some of the people who have come to us from boutique firms, from little firms, from some of the larger firms that you referred to, have said it's been a great experience. It's been a great experience. Not that we're perfect, but we actually deliver on supporting people growing their businesses. That's attractive for best people, and that word gets around. It's a virtuous loop that I work every day to keep us in because it is the key to us being able to grow through cycles. So far, we're not perfect, but it's going pretty well. Did that respond? Absolutely. Really appreciate the color. Thanks for taking my questions. The next question is from Tobey Sommer with Truist Securities. Please go ahead. Thank you. Just start out on, while intrinsically unpredictable, has there been a change in conditions for the company and/or opportunity for the company to do some sort of larger, maybe group hire laterally from a competitor? Anything there that we should think about and keep in mind in terms of variability of headcount, growth, this year? Yeah. You know, look, I don't know that there's been some, you know, precipitous dramatic change. I think as you know, we've been doing pretty well at attracting people laterally for the last while. We've been also promoting at a record rate. Without both of those, we couldn't have met the growth we've shown over the last while. We are actively monitoring this. You know, the question always is, you know, Is there a disruptive event in a competitor that means instead of onesies and twosies, you have a mass group of people who wanna leave? You know, the equivalent of Andersen Consulting or, you know, or a smart version of that. We constantly monitor that, and we try to make sure that we don't precipitate this. We're very supportive of a lot of other fine firms. We wish them all well. We wanna make sure that the world knows that if those things happen, then we are looking to add talent, and that if it hurts a quarter, we're willing to do it because that's how you grow a business. It's not like there are six people lining outside my door right here today, which we're gonna sign a deal on tomorrow, if that was the question. Does that respond? Sure. what's the outlook for boosting what has kind of been persistent and stubbornly low utilization in FLC? Maybe in the context to answering that, you could give us your perspective for the market for large projects in that space and in that segment. Yeah, look, I think, we have made quite a bit of progress actually in FLC over the last while. Some of it's masked by some other things that are going on in that segment. You know, the management team recognized that, last year. You know, we slowed some hiring, but more important, we got pretty aggressive commercially and made sure we were in front of certain potential assignments. Look, we've had very substantial revenue growth there. I think actually, to your point, it's still not at the utilization overall that we would like or they would like, but it's not because we're not growing. It's just that actually their expectations was for even faster growth, like many other parts of our business. I think we're gonna get the utilization to the levels we want. We may just either all the revenue that people are hoping comes in, or you can taper the growth of head count. I mean, you know, we're not. It's not like we're shrinking and you have to cut heads. What you have to do is, if you're growing a little less fast than you think you are, you may have to taper your hiring. I think we're in much better shape on that business than we were six and 12 months ago. Does that respond to your question? Thank you. Steve, was there any change you could perceive in demand in your various segments and lines of business, when SVB occurred and the current sort of banking crisis emerged? Just wondering if there was any opportunity or diminishment in demand in various pockets. Let me maybe talk to that at two levels. obviously, I can't talk to specific clients. you know, if there are disruptive events like, you know, banks going bankrupt and so forth, those sorts of things often, you know, can lead to sorts of demand for services that multiple of our segments, can provide. you know, there's that specific. The more general point you're making is, okay, so the second and third order consequences for that for some parts of our business. I mean, that's now getting into the sort of macroeconomic forecast that, you know, I read, I don't know how many of them you read a day, right? About, you know, okay, so is that equivalent to a 0.5% increase by the Fed? Will the Fed now only raise it 0.25 a point? Will they do less? Will that actually affect the housing market more? I mean, you know, you can drive yourself nuts on that. You know, I think my experience is what we need to focus on is making sure we have the right propositions and we're commercially aggressive enough and out in front. Then, you know, take stock periodically on our exuberance on head count growth. If we're a little over-exuberant, you taper your hiring. It's too hard to figure out the 2nd order or 6th order effect of the macro effects and adjust things. That's at least. If you know any, you can give me a call and let me know. I'd take the call. Does that at least respond, Billy? Right. Right. Sure. last year, G&A growth, infrastructure growth, sapped some of the ability for margins to expand. Could you talk about the risks and opportunities of that not occurring this year or, the risk of it recurring this year? You know, when we do interesting things, it also results in higher costs. If you're entering new markets, new countries, new locations, new adjacencies, and you want to give your practitioners the best experience and you want the best, you know, presentation for your clients as well, it does require that. We have, for example, you to hire as many people as we have hired, you do need recruiters. Otherwise, you'd end up paying outside companies a lot of money. To provide a good experience for people in a different country, you need dedicated people in that country to service those people. We are explicitly. That was a big part of the growth in non-billable head count. We are in a later innings. I'm not sure which one, but we are in a later innings in that. That should taper off in the second half of the year. A nice phrase for a guy who barely knows baseball. Hanging around you. Okay. Thank you. This concludes our Q&A session. Well, thank you all for taking the time. I mean, let me just reiterate, you know, feeling very good about the company, and the revenue of this quarter really demonstrates that. Obviously, the bottom line wasn't exactly what we wanted, but leaves us still with enormous confidence about where this company is moving over time. Looking forward to continue to engage with you all. Thank you very much. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.