Hello everyone, welcome to the Financial Institutions Inc. Q 2023 results call. My name is Nadia, I'll be coordinating the call today. If you would like to ask a question at the end of the presentation, please press Star followed by one on your telephone keypad. I will now hand over to your host, Kate Croft, Director of Investor Relations and External Relations to begin. Kate, please go ahead. Thank you for joining us for today's call. Providing prepared comments will be President and CEO, Marty Birmingham and CFO, Jack Plants. Chief Community Banking Officer, Justin Bigham, and Director of Financial Planning and Analysis, Mike Grover will join us for Q&A. Today's prepared comments and Q&A will include forward-looking statements. Actual results may differ materially from forward-looking statements due to a variety of risks, uncertainties and other factors. We refer you to yesterday's earnings release and investor presentation as well as historical SEC filings, which are available on our investor relations website for a safe harbor description and a detailed discussion of the risk factors relating to forward-looking statements. We will also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures intended to supplement and not substitute for comparable GAAP measures. Reconciliations of these measures to GAAP financial measures were provided in the earnings release filed as an exhibit to Form 8-K. Please note that this call includes information that may only be accurate as of today's date, April 27th, 2023. I'll now turn the call over to President and CEO, Marty Birmingham. Thank you, Kate. Good morning, everyone, thank you for joining us today. Q1 net income available to common shareholders was $11.7 million or $0.76 per diluted share, consistent with the linked quarter and down from the prior year period when the company reported $14.6 million or $0.93 per diluted share. The year-over-year decline was primarily the result of higher provision for credit losses and an increase in expenses compared to the year ago period, driven in part by investments in talent. Before turning the call over to Jack for more detail on our financial performance and our expectations for the remainder of the year, I would like to provide some insights and context on the health of our balance sheet. Given the recent bank failures, increased volatility, and broad brush commentary by the financial media, it's appropriate to provide a company-specific update. On the funding side, deposits totaled $5.1 billion at March 31st, up 4.3% from December 31st. As a reminder, we have a substantial public deposit portfolio associated with local municipalities, balances are typically higher in the Q1 as a result of seasonality associated with inflows from tax payments and state funding. Reciprocal deposits were also up during the quarter as this has become an attractive option, affording our larger customers the benefit of FDIC insurance on accounts greater than $250,000. Given the interest rate environment, we continue to see disintermediation from core transaction type accounts to time deposits in both our non-public and public deposit portfolios, which has impacted margin as non-public time deposit balances increased $89 million on a linked quarter basis through both new account acquisition and quarter time deposit disintermediation. Despite this expected remix of deposits, the granularity of our community banking franchise benefits our deposit portfolio. We operate through 49 banking locations across our upstate New York footprint, which have average deposit balances per branch of approximately $79 million, excluding reciprocal and broker deposits. Further, uninsured retail deposits make up approximately 14% of total deposits when considering the secured nature of our public and reciprocal portfolios, which typically have larger balances. Independent of the balance sheet, our available committed liquidity remains strong at approximately $1.2 billion. Organic loan growth was once again a highlight of our quarterly performance with a 4.8% increase in total loans from December 31, 2022, which was supported by a strong pipeline at year-end 2022 and several large commitments that carried over to the Q1 of 2023. In our investor presentation published yesterday, you'll find more granularity on our commercial portfolio and in particular, commercial real estate and office space exposure. Commercial growth has been achieved while maintaining our disciplined credit culture. Our experienced in-market lenders have excellent relationships with high quality sponsors within our footprint that have demonstrated consistency in execution and credit performance. Our CRE portfolio consists of assets with outstanding balances of $1.6 billion and committed credit exposure of $2.1 billion at March 31. There are more than 700 loan facilities associated with this portfolio among approximately 300 separate lending relationships, resulting in an average loan size of approximately $2.8 million. In considering the rollover risk of the portfolio, 15.5% of exposure is scheduled to mature within the next 12 months, and another 14% will mature within 24 months. We have been careful to scale our underwritten loan amounts to the global financial profile and track record of sponsors. Our analysis indicates approaching maturities are manageable. More than 90% of CRE loans have full or limited personal or corporate recourse, helping mitigate low rollover risk and reinforcing the alignment of interests between borrowers and Five Star Bank. The average loan-to-value ratio of the portfolio is 55%. Realizing that at a national level, there is a heightened focus on office CRE, I would like to comment on the stability of our office book, which we believe is of high quality and differentiated from what lenders operating primarily in large urban markets might be experiencing. Office space represents 18% of our CRE exposure and less than 8% of total loan balances at March thirty-first. About three-quarters of the portfolio is for class B or medical space, which consists of medical properties located in close proximity to hospitals in densely populated areas. We have very limited exposure to central business districts, with just four loans for properties representing total exposure of $27 million. We have strong confidence in the quality of the sponsors we're working with on these projects. In fact, two of these loans are with a publicly traded developer who will be leasing space to a publicly traded tenant with an A-plus credit rating for over 20 years, which is longer than the term of our loan. Consistent with our approach for all CRE lending, we have reasonable loan-to-leverage ratios for our office portfolio, including average loan-to-value at origination of 57%. In our annual stress testing of the portfolio, including increasing rates by 250 basis points above current rates and decreasing net operating income by 20%, we achieved debt service coverage ratios of one to 1. Supported by strong sponsors and personal recourse on loans, we remain comfortable with the overall quality and mix of the office book, given geographic dispersion, strong credit metrics, and exposure diversification outside of central business districts. Multifamily is our largest concentration, representing 39% of CRE exposures and 15% of loans. Within our multifamily portfolio, about 53% relates to stabilized properties, and the remainder are in the construction phase. We are considered a premier construction lender in our market and have been providing construction funds for projects that have identified permanent mortgage takeout options by obtaining long-term, non-recourse financing structures. Supporting the diversification of commercial loans is our expanded geographic footprint. Our Mid-Atlantic team, which joined us a little over a year ago, grew commercial loans outstanding by approximately $49 million in the Q1 of 2023 to $197 million at March 31st. In the Q1 of this year, we also announced our expansion into the Syracuse, New York market with a new commercial loan production office. We have three C&I lenders based at this office and believe this expansion will support the growth of our commercial business portfolio, which was up 4.6% during the Q1, driven by line draws. The team has been doing an excellent job of engaging with prospective clients so far, and we look forward to their future contributions. Our residential loan portfolio was relatively flat with the end of the linked Q4 as expected. Among ongoing pressures of inflation, higher interest rates, and tight housing inventory, the consumer indirect loan portfolio was one billion and a quarter annual, also flat with the linked quarter. As we noted on our call in January, we are proactively moderating consumer indirect production through pricing and continue to remain focused on credit quality and stringent underwriting standards, which has been and continues to be the foundation to this business activity. Ours is a prime lending operation with average portfolio FICO score of 714. In the Q1, 60% of consumer indirect fundings were tier one, 700 and above, and another 22% were tier two, 670 and above. The weighted average coupon on new production was 8.45%. Net charge-offs were 73 basis points in the current quarter, in line with historical trends. Our disciplined approach to credit and risk management continues to support strong asset quality metrics. For the Q1, we reported 21 basis points of both non-performing loans and annualized net charge-offs to average loans. While we did see a $17.7 million increase during the quarter in criticized and classified loans to $77.7 million, this increase related to two relationships that were downgraded to special mention. One in the C&I portfolio, which is expected to be temporary, as well as one CRE relationship where we are a participant. Provision for credit losses on loans was $4.2 million in the quarter, supporting an allowance for credit losses to total loans ratio of 112 basis points and 540% of non-performing loans at March 31st. Overall, credit remains benign, and we continue to believe our loan portfolio performance will be consistent with historic outcomes. This concludes my introductory comments. It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Jack for additional details on results and updates to our guidance for 2023. Thank you, Marty. Good morning, everyone. Net interest income of $41.8 million was down $1.3 million from the Q4 of 2022, reflective of fewer days in the most recent quarter, as well as the higher cost of funds in the current rate environment. Our overall cost of funds in the quarter was 162 basis points, up 53 basis points from the linked Q4. Net interest margin on a fully taxable equivalent basis was 309 basis points for the Q1 of 2023, compared to 323 basis points in the linked Q4. Margin was pressured by a shift in funding mix as our customers shifted balances from lower cost transaction deposit accounts to higher cost time deposits, and we brought on additional wholesale borrowing to fund loan growth that was higher than planned. With that said, we expect the pace of loan growth to moderate through the remainder of the year, with planned commercial growth being front-loaded into the first and second quarters. We continue to expect to deploy cash flow from our loan and securities portfolio, which represents a combined $1 billion through the course of the year into new loan originations at market rates to partially offset the impact of higher funding costs and stabilize our margin moving forward. Relative to the magnitude of FOMC rate increases that occurred in 2022 and so far in 2023, our total deposit portfolio has experienced a cycle to date beta of 27%, including the cost of time deposits. Excluding the cost of time deposits, the non-maturity deposit portfolio had a beta of 13%. Non-interest income, which includes revenue from our insurance and wealth management businesses, was $10.9 million in the Q1, consistent with the linked quarter as anticipated. Non-interest expense of $33.7 million was also flat to the linked quarter. In the current quarter, we recorded a higher level of FDIC insurance expense, due in part to the final rule that went into effect in 2023, increasing the initial base deposit insurance assessment rate schedules uniformly by 2 basis points, coupled with balance sheet growth driven by commercial mortgage loans. In comparison to the linked quarter, the increase in FDIC insurance offset non-recurring restructuring charges incurred in the Q4 of 2022 related to the 2020 closure of five branches. Income tax expense was $2.8 million in the quarter, representing an effective tax rate of 18.7% compared to $2.4 million at an effective tax rate of 16.4% in the Q4 of 2022. We saw improvement in our accumulated other comprehensive loss to $127.4 million, given the current position of the rate curve and roll-off of the investment securities. As you'll see in our investor presentation, relative to year-end 2021, just before the FOMC began raising interest rates, the unrealized loss position negatively impacted quarter end TCE by 193 basis points, intangible common book value per share by $7.42. Excluding the AOCI impact, our TCE ratio intangible common book value per share would have been 6.96% and $29.04, respectively. We continue to expect these metrics to return to more normalized levels over time given the high quality of our investment portfolio. I would now like to provide an update on our outlook for 2023 in key areas. We continue to expect mid to high single-digit growth in our total loan portfolio for full year 2023, although front-loaded given the strong Q1 results. We continue to expect that growth will be driven by commercial loan categories, inclusive of any contributions from our Mid-Atlantic and Central New York LPOs. We continue to plan for mid-single digit growth in non-public deposits with a heavier weighting in time deposits based on our Q1 actual experience. We are focused on attracting new consumer and commercial deposit accounts and expect the positive impact of these new accounts to be partially offset by a lower average balance per account as an outcome of the economic environment. Banking as a Service, or BaaS initiatives are expected to generate approximately $150 million of deposits in the last three quarters of 2023, a significant contributor to our non-public deposit growth goals. Given competitive pressures, we experienced a reduction in public deposits, some of which were shifted into the reciprocal deposit portfolio. We expect balances to be relatively flat throughout the remainder of 2023, with the exception of typical seasonal fluctuations on a quarterly basis. We now expect full year NIM of 305 to 315 basis points, approximately 25 basis points lower than previous guidance given the funding cost pressure experienced in the Q1. Our forecast assumes a forward rate curve that reflects economist predictions for a 25 basis point rate increase in May, with Fed activity remaining muted thereafter. Net interest margin is expected to be relatively flat for the remainder of the year. We now expect the 2023 effective tax rate to fall within a range of 18%-19%, including the impact of the amortization of tax credit investments placed in service in recent years. Our effective tax rate will be positively impacted by taking advantage of further investments. That concludes my prepared remarks and updated guidance. I'll now turn the call back to Marty. Thank you, Jack. Overall, despite a tough operating environment, I believe our company is off to a productive start in 2023. We reported strong loan growth in the Q1 and announced a strategic expansion into Central New York that enhances our commercial and industrial lending focus. We continue to report strong and stable asset quality metrics and reinforce our risk management culture with the hire of Gary Pacos as Chief Risk Officer. Gary is a talented risk professional with more than 30 years of progressive compliance, consumer credit, audit, and operations experience in the banking industry, and we look forward to his contributions as we continue to grow. During the Q1, we also were pleased to announce a 3.4% increase in our quarterly cash dividend, underscoring our board's confidence in our strategy and earnings potential. While we are navigating a challenging time for our industry and country brought on by recessionary concerns and heightened funding pressures, I continue to be optimistic for what we can achieve in 2023. Our Upstate New York footprint remains financially stable and has historically weathered recessions well. Our Mid-Atlantic team serves the attractive Washington, D.C., and Baltimore markets. As a community bank with local leadership and local decision-making, we believe our consistent focus on building meaningful relationships with our clients will support growth of our loan and deposit portfolios while setting us apart from larger players in our markets and driving value into the company. Looking ahead, we are focused on protecting our margin, effectively managing expenses, and introducing our relationship-based approach to banking-as-a-service, wealth management, and insurance to new customers throughout our markets and beyond. That concludes our prepared remarks. Operator, please open the call for questions. Of course. If you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. If you choose to withdraw your question, please press star followed by two. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure your phone is unmuted locally. Our first question today goes to Alex Twerdahl of Piper Sandler. Alex, please go ahead. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, guys. Good morning, guys. Hi, Alex. Morning, Alex. First question, Jack, I think I heard you say that there was $1 billion of cash flows from the securities portfolio over the next year. Is that correct? It seems like a really big number relative to the size of the portfolio. Yeah. The $1 billion in cash flow is combined between the securities portfolio and the loan portfolio. If we were to break that down, we'd estimate about a little north of $150 million from the securities portfolio and then about $900 million off the loan portfolio. Okay. The expectation for that, you know, just given your comments on loan growth potentially slowing down from here, I mean, you basically hit your guidance in the Q1 here with the loan growth, is that most of that is gonna go to either reinvestment in the securities portfolio or paying down higher costing deposits or borrowings? Yeah. Likely first to pay down borrowings and then reinvestment in the securities portfolio- Okay. Great should loan growth taper off. Right. You know, just to keep going on loan growth, I mean, it was a big quarter, especially commercial real estate grew pretty substantially. Can you comment a little bit on how the pipelines look today relative to the end of the year? Also, you know, the color you gave on commercial real estate and the credit quality and all that kind of stuff was very helpful, but I'm just curious if standards have changed internally for you guys in terms of what you're willing to look at or do in light of some of the ongoing issues in the industry. Alex, just to reinforce, our approach to credit remains consistent. You know, we've been operating in a market with a pretty tight, you know, underlying economy in terms of its growth. Our borrowers are disciplined. Our approach to providing credit has been disciplined. We have been thinking about, though, in light of, you know, the current issues in the industry, working with our teams to ensure that we're getting a sufficient return on our loans, introducing a liquidity premium relative to our real estate lending, and, you know, being very communicative with our borrowers, understanding where they stand, and understanding, you know, what our appetite is to, you know, continue to grow in that segment. We've, as I said, are very comfortable with our sponsors and the, you know, activities that we have, currently with our loan portfolio and those in the pipeline. The pipeline remains relatively stable. The demand for, you know, our type of banking is, you know, strong. It's unfortunate that we're working through a very serious situation relative to the bank failures, but the role of a bank of our size in the markets that we serve is critical, and our borrowers and customers know that. Yeah, that's a helpful color. Can you in terms of the almost $200 million in the D.C. market now, can you just give us a little bit more color on what's in there and whether or not there's any office exposure down in the Central District of D.C.? That's where we've talked about the exposure to significant activity in the last year has been related to, you know, medical buildings that are tied to medical centers, hospitals, medical campuses, et cetera. That is where in my comments we talked about the development loan to a core office in the central business district related to a publicly traded sponsor to a publicly traded A-rated long-term tenant. Yeah. I would just add, Alex, from a credit standpoint, those originations generally come with fairly low leverage at loan-to-values of about 45% at origination. Okay, great. Thanks for taking my questions. Thanks, Alex. Thank you. Our next question goes to Erik Zwick of Hovde Group. Erik, please go ahead. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Wanted to start, I guess, with a bit of a follow-up just on the loan growth expectations and more so with, I guess the question with the growth expected to kind of slow down in the back half of the year. I'm curious what you're seeing that leads that. Is something in the market or your decision? I guess, as I look at it, your loan-to-deposit ratio is still relatively low compared to industry averages at this point. You mentioned that the pipeline is stable. You're still seeing strong demand and then the new rates that loans are coming on would seem to be additive to the margin. Just curious, you kind of balance all those together, you know, what leads to the, you know, thoughts that loan growth will slow down? Again, is that something that you're doing or something in the market? Because it seems like there's opportunity to continue adding loans throughout the year if there's good risk-adjusted opportunities. Yeah, Erik, this is Jack. I'll take that question. As Marty mentioned on the commercial real estate side, we've implemented a liquidity premium in our pricing, which is commanding either a higher level of deposits at time of origination from a sponsor or a higher level of spread or a combination of both. That's working out very well for us in the Mid-Atlantic region. We're pricing a lot of deals off of SOFR. Borrowers are taking advantage of the inversion in the yield curve, locking in fixed rate funding to themselves when they do a back-to-back swap with us that's better than what they could traditionally achieve if it was just priced off of Treasuries or the Federal Home Loan Bank. Then we see it on our balance sheet as a nice rich spread over SOFR. That's achievable in that space from a competitive standpoint. There's still a bit of competition in the upstate New York market from some smaller banks and even credit unions have started to play in that space. I would expect that at our current pricing levels, that that pipeline will slow. Yep. Right now, you know, the point in time we're sharing where the pipeline stands, that could be negatively impacted as this great recession, excuse me, a recession that we've all been anticipating that hasn't shown up yet does show up. We do expect that our, you know, customers will react accordingly and, you know, potentially postpone projects, incremental investments in plant and equipment, et cetera, as a result of that. That's helpful. I appreciate the additional color there. Just curious if you could, I don't know if I missed it in the prepared comments, summarize maybe the changes you made to deposit service charges and what you would maybe expect kind of the run rate of that item to look like going forward following those changes. Sure. This is Jack. I'll take that one. Throughout 2022, we reviewed NSF fees relative to regulatory guidance and some of actions that were taken by our competitors and implemented changes to eliminate the returned item fee of $40. We also increased the de minimis overdraft amount from $5 to $50, and that became effective in the Q1 of this year. Generally speaking, from a seasonal standpoint, NSF fees or deposit service charge fees are lower in the Q1, but from a run rate perspective, that's the only change we expect to make this year. Okay. Thank you. One just last one, I think I asked a similar question last quarter, but just curious in terms of the Banking-as-a-Service initiative, wondering if you can just kind of provide an update. It's been, I guess, kind of 90 days since the last time we chatted about it, and just curious where you are in the process. I know you mentioned you expect $150 million in deposits to be coming on over the next three quarters, but just curious your kind of update on the total process, you know, what you've achieved over the next 90 days and what's on the horizon for the next quarter or two. Erik, I've asked Sean Willett to join us this morning. He's our Chief Administrative Officer and the leader of these initiatives among many in our company. Sean, do you want to respond? Sure. Erik, good morning. Relative to banking as a service, we continue to build out a robust pipeline. In terms of onboarding clients, we have a number of clients that we are in process of bringing them over to our platform. That's a transition off of other banking platforms. We expect a significant bulk of the $150 million to come over in the next 90 to 120 days. Excellent. Thanks everyone for taking my questions this morning. Thank you, Erik. Thanks, Erik. Thank you. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. Our next question goes to Damon DelMonte of KBW. Damon, please go ahead. Your line is open. Hi, this is Matt Renck filling in for Damon DelMonte. Hope everybody's doing well. As a follow-up to the banking-as-a-service question, I was just curious, were you able to generate deposits in the Q1? I just want to make sure I got the $100 million right. In deposits, those are coming from companies currently in the pipeline, or is that from partnerships that are live and already onboarded? Yeah. Again, this is Sean. I'll take that. In terms of the Q1, the amount of deposits that we onboarded was negligible because that's really driven by our testing and integration. The clients that we have live, it really depends on the clients, right? Some are transaction-oriented or payments-oriented, so those will drive fee income. Then the larger deposit opportunities are those that we had in pipeline, as well as a number of LOIs that we had in flight, and we're now in the process of onboarding those clients. As I said. Okay ... will occur over the next 90, 120 days. Okay. What kind of capacity do you have for that platform? Is there a certain limit to the number of partnerships you can have before you have to significantly scale up either tech or people? From a tech perspective, no. What we've done is we've built out our, you know, our service layer, our platform. We've been very thoughtful in that regard. As it relates to people, yes, there is a runway, and we have a resourcing model that we will put into action when we get to that point, but that's well beyond the $150 million that we have projected for this year. Okay, great. Thank you for the color. Then last one for me. Just on expenses, as you mentioned, you know, the recessionary environment looms. Do you have any room to cut expenses should revenues pull back from here on out? Well, let me start by saying that, you know, in the Q4, we worked hard to proactively deal with the headwinds that we knew were coming our way. We did take some meaningful expenses out of the company at that time. It was a tough time to do it, but we knew that was the right thing to do. Unfortunately, again, given the bank failures and what's happened, and the increase in volatility of our operating environment, interest rates, et cetera, you know, our expenses, efficiency ratio, the way the math works out, is going the wrong way. Many of the investments we've made in people and technology, though, occurred over the last year to 18 months, and we wanna be very thoughtful in terms of taking expenses out at this point, as we bridge to, you know, the other side of this economic situation or the operating environment we're in. Jack, I'll ask you to comment further. Just to summarize, Matt, I mean, we're focused on longer term opportunities for the organization and the enterprise. I would be cautious to cut expenses to simply benefit earnings in a short period of time. We continue to evaluate every opportunity through a business case to understand that earn back that's achievable inside of a short period of time. As we progress throughout the year, we'll continue to do just that. Okay, great. Thank you for the time. I'll step back. Hey, thanks, Matt. Thank you. We have no further questions. I will now hand back to Marty for any closing comments. I wanna thank everyone for participating this morning. We look forward to continuing to build on this conversation in the Q2 and beyond. Thank you. Thank you. This now concludes today's call. Thank you so much for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.