Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Flex LNG fourth quarter 2021 earnings presentation conference call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. After the speaker's presentation, there will be the question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you need to press star and one on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to our speaker today, Øystein Kalleklev. Please go ahead. Thank you, and welcome, everybody, to Flex LNG's fourth quarter and full year 2021 webcast. I'm Øystein Kalleklev, the CEO of Flex LNG Management, and I will be joined today by Knut Traaholt, our CFO, who will talk you through the financial numbers as well as our recent refinancing a bit later in the presentation. As always, we will conclude with our Q&A sessions. If you'd like to ask a question in the Q&A session, you can either ask questions through our teleconference or use the chat function. First, before we start, we remind you of our disclaimer as we will provide some forward-looking statements in relation to future revenue guidance. We'll also use some terms like time charter equivalent earnings and adjusted earnings and EBITDAR, which are non-GAAP measures. There are limits to the completeness of details we can provide in this webcast. We recommend that the presentation is read together with the earnings report, which we also released today. Let's kick off with a short summary of our highlights, slide three. First of all, we are pleased to deliver knockout results with the best ever quarter on most financial measures. Revenues came in at $115 million, slightly ahead of our revenue guidance of approximately 110 million. When I was putting the final touches on the slides last night, I put in that time charter equivalent earnings were the best ever with our average TCE of $95,900 per day in the fourth quarter. I recall that when I presented our Q4 2018 results, we had a bullet point with TCE for the quarter of about 95,000 in the earnings presentation. However, following our listing in the U.S. in 2019, we had to provide more stringent non-GAAP details about historical TCE earnings. Our accountants actually found out that the TCE in Q4 2018 was slightly higher at 97,500. I apologize for the late hour mistake. That said, this is probably the first time at least I have seen a shipping company revising up their historical TCE numbers. It's usually the other way around. During 2021, we acted on improved term market and secured eight or possibly nine fixed hire contracts with a minimum firm duration of these contracts between three and five years. I think our ability to attract long-term attractive term employment with super majors and other top-tier clients demonstrates not only that we have state-of-the-art ships in our fleet, but also that our seafarers and onshore personnel are delivering a first-class service, both in terms of safety and reliability to our charters, as several of them are repeating customers of ours. A special thanks to the crew onboard and onshore staff that are keeping the propellers turning despite the many challenges caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. While a lot of folks are these days heading back to their office, I can tell you that seafarers are still facing many needless obstacles when it comes to crew rotation, particularly in Asia, where about three out of four cargos ends up. We do hope that restrctions and limitations will also be eased for our crew during 2020 so we can get back to normal. Hence, in Q4, our spot exposure was related to four ships. One ship, Flex Volunteer, was trading in the spot market, while three ships were on variable hire contracts where the earnings are linked to the spot market. With all 13 ships on the water, our spot exposure was therefore about 30% in the quarter, which is significantly less than in the past. As our cost base is more or less fixed, at least in the short to medium term, this means that higher top line trickle down directly to the bottom line, and we therefore delivered all-time high net income and adjusted net income of 69 million and 63 million respectively. Adjusted earnings are slightly lower because we are adjusting out our significant gains on our interest rate hedges. While the Fed has been behind the curve on interest rates, we have been ahead of the curve, securing a substantial part of our interest rate exposure at low levels as Knut will explain. Earnings per share came in at $1.31 per share with adjusted earnings of $1.18 per share. Given the fact that we have locked in premium backlog coupled with our super strong financial position, the board last quarter decided to increase our dividend level to 0.75 per share, which we said was a level we were comfortable with in the longer run. Hence, we are again declaring a quarterly dividend of 0.75 per share, which gives our shareholders an attractive annualized running yield of about 15%. In November, we announced a balance sheet optimization program. By de-risking our commercial strategy through adding substantial long-term premium backlog, we decided to explore financial alternatives with the aim of unlocking 100 million of cash from our balance sheet. Today, we are announcing 695 million of new financing. This financing will together release another minimum 87 million in cash on top of the 38 million, which we released through the sale leaseback of Flex Volunteer, which was announced in November and executed in December. As Knut will explain, we have thus already over-delivered on the program initiated in November with 125 million unlocked overall, which will contribute to further grow our cash balance, which by the way, stood at 201 million at year-end. Hence, we have a super strong liquidity position, and this enable us to quickly act on opportunities if they arise, but also it secures our ability to maintain an attractive dividend level. Lastly, I would like to point out that 93% of available days in 2022 is already covered, which gives us a pretty accurate assessment of where revenues for the year will end up. Turning to page four and our fleet status. As you can see, charter coverage for 2022 is already 93% with substantial charter coverage also for 2023 and 2024. During Q1, we have a couple of ships coming off shorter term charters and going on longer term charters. In February, Flex Freedom will be redelivered from a 10-month time charter and delivered on a minimum five-year charter with a supermajor. Flex Constellation is currently serving a minimum three-year time charter with a large trading company. Flex Endeavour, Ranger, and Vigilant was delivered during last summer to Cheniere on time charters with a minimum duration of three-3.8 years, with Cheniere also taking one or two additional vessels from us during third quarter this year. In February, Flex Aurora was also redelivered from a shorter term time charter, and we recently secured her a short-term flexible time charter of five-seven months, which match exactly with the delivery window for ship number four and or number five with Cheniere. In January and February, we are also delivering Flex Courageous and Flex Resolute on a three + two + two-year time charter with a supermajor after these ships also being employed on shorter term time charters in 2021. As mentioned in the third quarter presentation, you can see that several of our ships are coming off shorter-term time charters, and are now commencing longer-term charters with higher earnings. We are thus repricing our portfolio at better levels for longer periods. Flex Rainbow was recently extended by one year with a large trading company, so we will now get her back in early 2023. With few modern ships available in the market near term, we thus find Flex Rainbow well-positioned. Flex Volunteer is the ship that we elected to keep in the spot market during 2021, which was a smart move given the strong spot market last year. The spot market so far in 2022 has, however, been very challenging, so we don't have high expectation when it comes to earnings for this ship in Q1 this year. I will provide more information about the spot market a bit later in the presentation. Our expectation is that Flex Volunteer or Flex Aurora will be the fifth ship going to Cheniere for a minimum period of three and a half years, starting in Q3. Lastly, we have three ships on variable hire contracts, this being Flex Artemis on a minimum five-year variable hire contract with Gunvor, as well as Flex Amber and Flex Enterprise. Both Flex Amber and Flex Enterprise were recently extended by another year, and the charter has one additional extension option for these two ships, so these ships will come open during 2023 or 2024, which is still ahead of the large newbuilding order book in 2025. We are also upbeat about the prospect of securing these ships good contracts when they are redelivered to us, unless we decide to trade them spot. This really depends on the market, both spot and term market, and where we think we can find the best value. Slide five, our earnings visibility. I've already covered our backlog extensively on previous slide. On Slide five, we also illustrate how our charter coverage develops over the next couple of years in percentage of covered days each quarter. Most of the backlog is now fixed hire, but we also maintain some variable hire backlog, which gives us exposure to the spot market. We also do have some ships coming open in this period, and as mentioned, we will decide whether to employ them in the spot or shorter term market or whether we will be fixing them on longer term contracts. Time will tell. Stay tuned. Slide six. Let's jump to the revenue guidance, which is probably the analyst favorite slide, as they now can have an easy job of updating their financial models. This slide shows the revenue guidance for the year. In May last year, following our recent fixture of several of our ships, we provided revenue guidance for the remaining quarter of the year, given the de-risking of our chartering strategy. That guidance we overdelivered on with revenues for the year of 343 million. Given the fact that we have covered 93% of available days in 2022, we can also provide a good estimate of our expected revenues for the year. We do however have Flex Volunteer trading spot, at least during the first half of the year, and we have three ships on variable hire, so the achieved revenues will depend on the spot market development as well as us being able to successfully achieve the high uptime which we have done in the past. As I will touch upon a bit later in the presentation, the spot market has been weak in the first quarter, and this impacts our spot-exposed ships adversely at the start of the year. We do expect that revenues will be slightly below the levels we achieved last year when the spot market was booming at the start of the year and when we had substantially higher exposure to the spot market. Nevertheless, we do think that the revenues will not come in significantly below the level during Q1 last year. As we do have higher charter coverage, we do, however, expect the revenues to be quite a lot higher in Q2 this year and somewhat higher in Q3. Whether we will see another freight market boom in Q4 this year is too early to tell. Since we do expect that Cheniere will utilize the option to take the fifth ship, we expect our spot exposure to be slightly lower in Q4 this year, and thus we expect revenues to be somewhat below the level we managed to achieve in Q4 2021. Overall, however, revenues are expected to be in line with the healthy revenue levels of 2021. We expect that 2022 will be another good year for us, which is maybe not too surprisingly with our coverage. Now turning to next slide. Turning from the analyst's favorite slide to the investor's favorite slides, dividends. We have covered our dividend philosophy at length during the second and third quarter presentation, so I'm not going to repeat all the factors and considerations we evaluate when setting the appropriate dividend level. However, I still want to repeat that we use a balanced and measured approach to conclude a sustainable dividend level with the aim of distributing our free cash flow over the cycle. I know consensus estimates predicted an even higher dividend for the quarter given our stellar earnings. I can admit that 64% payout ratio probably would not impress Shania Twain much. However, when we hiked our quarterly dividend level to 0.75 last quarter, we also communicated that we wanted to set a dividend level which we think is sustainable over the longer term. Despite our substantial backlog, our earnings will bounce a bit up and down given our exposure to the spot market. If you look at the year overall, we generated adjusted earnings per share of $2.71 per share. We could declare dividends of $2.3, and we acted on the opportunity to buy back shares with a total of 0.15 per share utilized for this purpose. Hence, total shareholder distribution for the year was $2.45 per share, which translate to a 90% payout ratio. In addition, we took delivery of our third of our three last newbuilding during 2021, and the net CapEx in relation to this was about $17 million or 0.33 per share. If we add these capital expenditures, we actually spent $2.78 on shareholder distribution and CapEx during the year, which is slightly higher than adjusted earnings per share. Despite the high payout ratio and some CapEx as mentioned, we still managed to grow our cash pile during the year from $128 million at the start of the year to $201 million at the end of the year. With that, I think it's a convenient time for Knut to provide some more details about the financial numbers and our balance sheet optimization program before I will revert with some market updates. Thank you, Øystein. We'll start with some key figures for 2021. At the left of the graph, we see the total operating days, which with the 70% increase in total operating days illustrates the fleet newbuilding program or fleet growth plan, where we have had the full earnings capacity from the second half of the year. The TCE numbers for, as Øystein already mentioned, was just shy of $96,000 per day for Q4. For the total year, the $15 per day increase year-on-year is mainly driven by the super strong performance by the three vessels on variable hire contracts and the Flex Volunteer trading in the spot market. Going to the cash breakeven, we're also delivering on strong cost control with the breakeven for the year at $43,700 per day as compared to the guiding one year ago, about 45,300 per day. During the year, the OpEx has been affected on average about $600 per day by COVID-related costs, where $400 per day is direct COVID-related costs, while about $200 per day is indirect COVID-related costs. These are typical terminal restrictions making crew handovers more challenging and therefore more expensive. Despite the Western world opening up and easing travel restriction, as I mentioned, we still experience restrictions for crew changes, and we also expect to have COVID-related costs going into 2022. We then turn to slide nine. With the larger fleet, we're also delivering all-time high revenues for the quarter, about 150 million, and above the guiding of 110 million given in Q3. Also all-time high revenues for the year with $343 million in total. This translates into an adjusted net income of $63 million for the quarter and $145 million for the year. That's a giant leap compared to 2020 and reflects our fleet growth, market exposure strategy combined with the hot LNGC markets. Similarly, the adjusted EPS of $1.18 per share for the quarter translating into a solid $2.71 per share for the full year. The adjusted net income and adjusted EPS are adjusted for fluctuations in the fair value of our interest rate swap, where we re-recorded a gain of 7.4 million for the quarter and 18 million for the total year. As interest rates has continued to increase during 2022, the fair value of our interest rate portfolio has further increased by 1 million so far this year. If we turn to slide 10. We're moving to the cash flow. Despite Q3 dividend of 75 cents per share, or total $40 million, which were paid out in the quarter, we increased our cash balance with 63 million to a total of 201 million at the end of the year. That is, as mentioned, due to strong cash flow from operation and the release of about $38 million under the balance sheet optimization program related to the Flex Volunteer refinancing. We can turn further to slide 11. Our balance sheet, which is extremely straightforward. We have a fleet of modern state-of-the-art LNGC vessels with an average age of 2.2 years and with a book value of about 2.4 billion, or on average, book value of about 180 million per vessel. In addition, we have a solid cash position, as already mentioned, of 201 million. The balance sheet is funded by a portfolio of attractive long-term leases and bank facilities, about 1.6 billion or 65% of our balance sheets. This results in $890 million in equity or a 35% book equity ratio. On the next slides, we'll look more into the development of the balance sheet optimization program. We'll turn to slide number 12. The Flex Volunteer transaction announced in November and executed in December was the first transaction under the $100 million balance sheet optimization program. Today, we announced two new financing under the same program, which will support the target of freeing up liquidity, reduce cost of debt, and maintain our industry-leading cash break-even rate. We have received two credit-approved term sheets for an aggregate amount of $695 million for the financing of five ships, and in addition, an uncommitted accordion option to upsize the bank facility with 125 million, and they are adding an additional ship to the facility. The new financings are subject to final documentation and normal closing conditions, and is expected to be closed during the second quarter. On the bank facility that is split in a $250 million non-amortizing RCF and a 125 million term facility, both with a tenor of approximately six years. The total facility is repaid on an average age-adjusted repayment profile of 22 years, and we have allocated all amortizations to the term loan, so we will have a bullet RCF. That will give us significant financial flexibility, and we will be able to reduce interest costs by managing the utilization of the RCF when we have a large amount of free cash. The accordion option gives us the flexibility to consider the best funding alternative for the last vessel and is identified as Flex Enterprise. The two 10-year leases will release significant amount of cash, which enable us to part fund and repay higher levered vessels, as the Flex Endeavour and Flex Enterprise, which are funded with the two leases today. In total, the net proceeds of this is about $87 million. As noted in the presentation, if we decide not to refinance Flex Enterprise with the accordion option, we may free up an even higher amount. On the back of these financings, we are upsizing the target of the 100 million to minimum 125 million, and also guide that we will complete the program ahead of the targeted or announced completion within 12 months. We are very pleased with the terms we have been offered, and that reflects also our attractive position and track record in the credit market. The two transactions meets our targets of longer durations, increased financial leverage, reflecting the lower operational leverage, reduced cost of debt, and longer repayment profiles. With that, we also thank our lease providers and banks for their commitment and continued support to Flex LNG. We turn to the next slide. After the completion of the transactions we announced today, we will push our first maturity payments from 2024 to 2028 and 2032 respectively. Hence, the only debt maturity on the horizon is the 250 million commercial tranche under the original 629 million ECA facility financing five vessels. Given the quality of these vessels, modest leverage, and time to maturity, we consider this as a quite manageable maturity and rather consider them as a possible candidate for future balance sheet optimization initiatives. On the right side of the slide, we have had a number of incoming questions regarding our drydock schedule, and some of our vessels are approaching their five-year anniversary. As shown in the graph, the drydock CapEx commitments are marginal over the next five years. In addition to the CapEx shown here, we estimate about approximately 20 days of off-hire in connection with each drydocking. With that, I conclude the financial review and hand it back to you, Øystein. Thank you, Knut. Knut, he joined us here in May last year and after working as a senior banker for the last 15 years. Some of his fellow bankers asked him what the hell he was gonna do as CFO in Flex, given the fact that we had already financed the whole fleet. Well, I think we have proved that we can still put him to good use with our balance sheet optimization program. That means we are not only happy with the utilization of our fleet during 2021, but also with the utilization of our CFO. Keep it up in 2022, Knut. 100% utilization is the minimum bar. Let's start on the market section. In our market section in November, in connection with our Q3 and numbers, we presented growth figures for the LNG market with 17 million ton growth in the period between January to October. LNG export growth slowed in the last two months of the year due to outages and slower export growth in the U.S., as they recorded zero cargo cancellation during November and December, 2020. However, U.S. still managed to increase their export by an impressive 23 million tons during 2021, which was actually 120% of the market growth. In any case, we ended up at 19 million tons export growth, or about 5% growth in 2021, which is pretty decent, but about 6 million tons lower than our expectation going into 2021, with the shortfall caused by lower exports, primarily from Nigeria and Trinidad & Tobago, due to feed gas issues. Norway's decline was, however, expected as the LNG plant at Melkøya is set to resume operations during Q2 this year. Egypt also staged a big comeback in 2021 with 5 million tons of export growth, and there are more potential in Egypt, for future growth. On the import side, demand was driven primarily by China, which added 10 million tons of imports, South Korea with 6 million tons, and outlier Brazil, which surprisingly added 5 million tons due to drought caused by La Niña, which affected hydro balances adversely. This just goes to show the advantage of having LNG import terminals, as LNG can swiftly add flexible capacity if needed. There are some lessons here for the biggest natural gas consumer in Europe, Germany, which still do not have a single LNG import terminal. Germany have had a couple of LNG import terminals on the drawing table for some time, but have not been able to go forward due to political bickering and incoherent energy policies. In our Q3 presentation, where we presented imports from January to October. A negative outlier was Europe, which had imported 9 million tons less than in 2020 or about 12%. With more flows to Europe in November and December, Europe's LNG import was only down 2 million tons for the full year compared to 2020. Slide 15. Before talking more about European LNG imports, let's have a look at U.S. exports and the tremendous growth rate. In 2021, U.S. exports bounced back nicely with continuous growth during the year, with the exception of February when the big freeze curtailed exports. In December and January, U.S. was in fact the world's largest LNG exporter, surpassing both Australia and Qatar. This is before the taps are turned on on the two new liquefaction projects, Calcasieu Pass and Sabine Pass Train 6, which will add another 15 million tons of U.S. export capacity this year. We are in for real LNG nail biter this year. Who will be the biggest LNG exporter in 2022? Our estimate is that Australia and U.S. will be neck and neck at around 82 million tons, slightly ahead of the 79 million tons of expected exports from Qatar. With these LNG prices we are seeing today, we can expect exporters to try to squeeze every single methane molecule through their liquefaction plants in order to bring the good stuff to the market. It will for sure be a thriller. Slide 16 and returning to Europe. While we in our third quarter presentation had a slide about the pool of cargos to Asia, this time we have to talk about the pool to Europe, which is already touched upon. While in January this year, imports to Europe was up almost 400% from the lows recorded in July this last summer, and also January 2021, when imports to Europe was hovering at around 4 million tons. This goes a long way to explain why the spot market is starting soft this year. Last January, we had a big pool to Asia driving up ton-mileage. This January, we've seen Europe gobbling up flexible LNG cargos and diverting those cargos away from Asia. If we head back to slide 17 and U.S. With Europe in a severe energy crisis by November and December, a flotilla of U.S. LNG exports saved the day. Well, we can admit that Europe was also fortunate with the weather gods, given the somewhat warmer winter weather than expected. Keep in mind that most LNG are sold and bought not on a flexible manner. Most LNG are sold on the longer-term contracts, typically with destination clauses prohibiting deviation of cargos. However, the vast majority of U.S. volumes have no such destination clause. U.S. were able to shift volumes towards Europe with the European market share of U.S. LNG going from only 15% during July, August to 75% by January this year. This goes back to my point about having LNG import terminal is a very good risk strategy and not only a very easy way and quick way of phasing out coal. Slide 18. It just shows the pull to Europe on a global aggregated basis, with Europe doubling its global market share from 15-16% during the summer to about 33% January this year. As illustrated, most of the increase in European imports came from the U.S. As you can see, the pull to Latin America, which I also mentioned, and then in particular Brazil, came during their winter season, which lasts from May to September. Slide 19, why the spot freight market soured in December. If you are an attentive viewer, I think you already figured it out. It's the West-East arbitrage. While in November 30, during October, November, the arbitrage from West to East widened. We had been trading at a $1-$3 level during the early phases of the autumn, and this arbitrage shot up to a level of $5-$7 during October and November, which meant that a lot of cargos were pulled from the Atlantic basin into Asia. At November 30, the Asian spot price stood at around $37 per million BTU, $6 higher than the European gas price. This meant that a cargo in Asia was worth $24 million more than the cargo value in Europe, and this incentivized this flow of cargos to Asia rather than Europe. At one point here, the energy crisis in Europe became so severe. This is due to the fact that Russian pipeline flows will keep disappointing and gas storage levels were hitting all-time lows. When the security situation in Ukraine became tense, the European gas market more or less exploded with gas prices in Europe going haywire. While we saw Asian gas prices hitting a high in October of $56, we saw European gas prices in December, on December 21, rallying all the way up to $60. With that, West-East arbitrage shutting, in three weeks' time, we went from a profitable $24 million West-East arbitrage to a minus $60 million arbitrage spread. This, again, as I mentioned, resulted in U.S. cargoes heading for Europe, and that also meant that sailing distances plummeted. If you are taking a cargo from U.S. heading into Asia, you are traveling around 10,000 nautical miles. During October, November, we also had severe congestion in Panama, so a lot of cargoes had to go through Cape of Good Hope, which adds another 5,000 nautical miles to the voyage, bringing it to 15,000 nautical miles. If these cargoes are then instead going to Europe, travel distance is shortened to 5,000 nautical miles. It means you need a lot less ships in order to transport the same number of cargoes. This is why we had this quick and rapid softening of the spot market during December and into January. If we look at this, the public market as of today on slide 20, let's see here. I was sitting up late last night and waiting for the Platts report, and the kind of the tensions in Ukraine, at least on the surface, eased, and this resulted in gas prices in Europe plummeting and settling in at around $22 per million BTU, and they are even down a bit further today. This actually resulted in the West-East arbitrage opening again because JKM or the Asian spot prices settled at $25.4 yesterday. Let's see. It's the gas market is very volatile. Prices are going up and down quite a lot, but at least the gas market, a snapshot of the gas market today looks a bit more conducive for the spot market. If we are then jumping to the spot market and a short review of 2021. We started 2021 at all-time high levels. As I previously illustrated, the pull to Asia was very strong in January last year, with Europe not being able to source much of the U.S. cargoes. We had a brief dip in the market during March, April, when actually JKM hit a low of $5.7. Then the market bounced back very quickly during April, May, driven by a huge pull to Asia, as I mentioned, with the rapid growth of especially South Korean and Chinese demand. We had a very conducive summer market with LNG, spot market rates for modern tonnage, you know, moving like a snake from around $70,000-$100,000, which is pretty good for the summer months. Then rates took off when we approached the heating season, which they usually do, and we hit another high of around $300,000 in November, early December, before, as I mentioned, this West-East arbitrage closed, sailing distances dropped, and cargoes were heading to Europe, and thus the spot market fell from $300,000 and continued to fall into 2022 at a level today of around $40,000 per day. If we head to the next slide. We have had some questions from investors who have noticed, you know, Baltic and the Spark being slightly negative, and also Bloomberg picked up this story with freight rates for LNG carriers below zero. How can it be that headline rates are $40,000 while the Baltic index and the Spark is quoting negative numbers? I spent some time in the past trying to explain this freight market in terms of LNG, where we are operating on a time charter basis, where the freight rate consists of basically three elements. It's the headline rate quoted by brokers, it's the ballast bonus, and ballast bonus condition can shift quickly from strong to very weak as they are today. There's a positioning fee element. These three elements make up the earnings for our owner, and then you need to add this all together and divide by a number of days utilized for the voyage to calculate your time charter equivalent earnings. Depending on the market sentiment, this can go from one-way economics, full-haul basis to three-way economics, and I will illustrate this a bit on the next slides. Let's start with the easy one, which is like the normal market, which I would, you know, characterize last summer. Last summer, you had a pretty conducive market, and the market was at what I would consider round trip market. In such a market, you typically, you know, if the rates are $75,000, you get paid for both ways. You get paid for the laden leg, of course, but you also get paid for the ballast leg back to load port. In such a market, the headline rate is similar to the time charter equivalent rate quoted by Baltic and Spark. We went from a very conducive market in the summer to a hot market during October, November, and partly December. In such a market, you have a scramble for available ship because the market is more or less sold out. In such a market, you can actually go from two-way economics to three-way economics, where you also, in addition to getting paid for the ballast and laden leg, is also getting paid for the positioning leg, which is actually then can create TCE levels well above headline rates. For example, if you have a ship in Atlantic Basin, you are competing for the transportation of U.S. cargo, and your only competitor is a guy with a ship in Singapore. The guy in Singapore needs to have a long ballast leg from Singapore to U.S., and then maybe this cargo is going to Japan, and then he gets a ballast bonus back to load port in U.S. If you then have a ship in Atlantic, you can therefore add on a positioning fee because you are closer to the load port, which are then boosting your earnings. In a soft market, which we have seen at the start of the year, you can then end up in a one-way economics, where you only get paid for the laden leg. If the laden leg is paid $40,000 and you are not getting paid for the ballast leg, your kind of economics is $20,000 per day. In this environment, where you have high fuel prices, both fuel oil or compliant fuel and LNG, that can bring the time charter equivalent earnings down to zero or even slightly below. Why would you do that? Well, you know, it could be that you have taken heel on board and that heel is sunk cost because you will have some boil off from the ship, and then you basically have to flare the boil off gas in the funnel. Rather than just wasting it, you might as well position the ship, do a cargo, and get some earnings rather than none. Of course, usually these markets don't last long, but it can happen in a soft market, which we have seen in January. If we then head back to a bit more tight market, which is the term market. While the spot market has softened during January and February, the term market has been holding up pretty well. The one-year time charter rates quoted by Fearnleys, which is the best proxy for, you know, next 12 months earnings, has, you know, fallen from $125,000- $100,000 per day. You know, $100,000 per day is still pretty decent earnings. The Fearnleys three-year time charter rate hasn't moved at all. That rate is still $90,000 per day. It basically reflects the fact that, you know, the freight market looks pretty solid on paper for 2022. As I will present shortly, we do expect volumes or export volumes to be even higher in, you know, 2022 than in 2021. We expect volumes to grow 25 million tons compared to 19 million tons last year, while the order book of new ships is almost half. We do think the spot market will rebalance and improve during the year. Availability of modern tonnage for the next couple of years is tight because most of the ships in the order book are committed. Right now, it's hard to get yard slots, even for delivery in 2025, and it's getting really hard to get for 2026, which is looking pretty tight. That just means that the term rates are holding up, and there's also another reason for term rates holding up, which I will cover on slide 25. Please, if you can jump. Okay, that's newbuilding prices. Newbuilding prices have been picking up for quite some time now. We have seen a flurry of orders. This firstly driven by a lot of projects, which I will also cover. There is a lot of new projects coming to the market, and these projects needs new ships. Additionally, which I will also cover, there are still a lot of old ships that need to be replaced, and higher steel prices, higher material prices, cost inflation, and the fact that the yards are preoccupied with a lot of container orders have pushed newbuilding prices upwards. With the recent orders quoted at somewhere around $220 million-$225 million. If you're buying a ship at $225 million, of course, you need to have a higher term rate to reflect the capital outlay for that ship. We were buying ships when nobody else were buying ships in 2017, at least on a speculative basis. In 2017 and early part of 2018, newbuilding prices then were hitting rock bottom for the new MEGI X-DF of around $180 million. We're not rushing to the yards ordering new ships today. We are focused on employing our ships in the best way, and we have done that successfully in 2021, and we'll continue to build on that in 2022. As mentioned on 20... Yeah, jump to 26, yeah. As I mentioned, newbuilding orders are driven by two things. It's the growth of the market and there's a lot of new projects coming to the market, and it's also related to the fact that we have a lot of old inefficient ships in our fleet, as illustrated by this graph. Math, it's not a typo in the headline. We have some regulation coming into force next year, which is called the EEXI. We do think, and we have argued for a couple of years now, that this will create a lot more demolition of older inefficient ships. I think even if you didn't have this regulation coming into force, you would still have a big increase in scrapping of older ships due to the simple fact of economics. With this kind of high LNG prices we are seeing today, our ships are about 60% more efficient than an old steamship. When you are burning either compliant fuel with oil prices above $90 or LNG with high LNG prices, having a modern efficient ship has a great value for the charters who actually pay for the fuel. We have seen more orders. I mentioned earlier, there's not that many ships coming to the market in 2022, so newbuilding orders will drop substantially from 2021 to 2022 and this combined with the pretty high work level is why we think the market will rebalance this year. Also in 2023, the order book is fairly small. A lot of the ships coming in 2023 are specialized tonnage for the Russian Arctic trade, which usually don't compete in the more regular conventional LNG carrier market. In addition to EEXI, we also have the European Union implementing carbon taxation for shipping. This will also come into force now and that will also penalize the older, less efficient ships. Let's head to LNG prices. As I mentioned, LNG prices are high. Last quarterly presentation in November, we said that LNG market will be tight and prices will gradually normalize by summer of 2023, but the futures curves have just gone up and we are in for high LNG prices for quite some time according to the futures market. Actually the people with oil priced indexed LNG contracts, which have suffered in the past, because the contract price has been much less than the spot LNG prices, they can now finally smile for quite some time. Even though oil prices are high, the contract price of $10-$12 looks very attractive today. As I mentioned, these high gas prices will favor modern tonnage. Heading to 28. I already mentioned this a bit. We do think export growth will be strong this year. It's driven by U.S. As I highlighted earlier, U.S. has two new projects coming on stream this year and they have some organic growth. We and the Energy Information Administration in the U.S. think growth will add the U.S. will add around 20 million tons this year. Norway will start up their LNG plant sometime in Q2 at probably around 2.5 million tons. Both Nigeria and Trinidad Tobago have projects to solve their feed gas issues, which they think will be corrected somewhere in the middle of this year. We do think that both Trinidad Tobago and Nigeria will add about 2 million tons of additional export this year. Russia has a new project this year, so we do expect growth of around 2 million for Russia. We think there are some possibility of both Australia and Qatar producing somewhat higher in 2022, especially given the high LNG prices. All in all, we add this up to around 25 million tons or 6% growth for 2022, slightly higher than what we saw last year. I mentioned 29. Just jump to 29. As I mentioned, there are several new projects, and this is one of the big drivers for all the newbuilding orders. We have several projects in the U.S. and of course this big Qatari project with Qatari today also announcing another round of newbuildings. Of course, and in the end, as I mentioned in the past, we do think that this will result with the Qataris probably ordering around 100 ships in total. That will certainly lock up yard slots and will keep LNG newbuilding prices at fairly elevated levels. Let's conclude. Again, we delivered stellar revenues, 150 million for the quarter, TCE of $96,000 per day. Our EPS are fantastic at 1.31 and 1.18, adjusted for our derivative gains. We have covered 93% of the year. We are continuing to pay the 0.75 dividend, which gives our investors a very attractive yield in this low interest rate environment. We are upbeat about the market even though the market is softer than expected in Q1 due to this West-East arbitrage being closed for most of the year so far. We have a solid cash balance, 201 million at year-end. With this new financing that Knut has talked about, we are adding another 87 million on top of that. With that, I think it's time to do some questions. Nadia, maybe you could see if there are some questions on the teleconference first. Thank you. Dear participants, once again, if you wish to ask a question over the phone, please press star and one on your telephone keypad. Dear speaker, there are no questions on audio at this moment. Okay, thanks. I do think we have some chat questions, so maybe you can just shoot them over, Knut, to me. Yes, we have some questions from the web. Hello, Øystein. Congratulations on the Q4 results. Can you please comment a bit on the EU emission plan for shipping? Yeah. I think I already touched upon it. EU have decided to broaden the scope of their Emissions Trading System, which will also include shipping, which will be phased in now from 2023 onwards. This means that ships sailing into Europe will have to buy carbon permits for their CO2 emissions and maybe their CH4 emissions, methane slip emissions. This seems not to be concluded yet, but in case of CH4 emissions, this really makes our MEGI ships incredibly attractive in the market. The cargo owners will have to then buy carbon permits and if you have been paying attention to carbon market in Europe, it has been on a tear. The carbon prices in Europe are incredibly expensive at around EUR 90 per ton. This, you know, will then, of course, significantly improve the competitiveness of our ships, which are consuming, as I mentioned, about 60% less fuel than a steamship, both because we have a more efficient engine, but also because we can have a parcel size which is about 30% bigger. You know, we are looking positively towards implementation of this, but there are still some rules that are not clear, and especially in relation to CH4 emissions. Because if you are adding CH4 emissions, it's a big thing. You know, the first is the question you have to ask yourself, if you are adding CH4 emissions, what kind of multiplier will you add? Methane emissions don't last long in the atmosphere, but they are very potent. On a 20-year cycle, a CH4 emission is about 85 times worse than CO2. Since methane, this is broken down in the atmosphere much quicker than CO2, on a 100-year cycle, they are about 28 times worse than CO2. What will the factor EU applies here be? Will it be 85 or 25 or 28 or some other random factor? Still, it means that if you all have to pay for the CH4 emission, that will be very expensive. It will certainly favor trading efficient ships into the European carbon trading emission zone. Let's see when we get all the details, but in general, we think it's a competitive advantage for us. We have three questions on the use of proceeds and our cash balance prepared for opportunities. What are our priorities? Finance newbuilding orders, fleet expansion, or consolidation? Yeah. I think I already touched upon newbuilding orders. We are, you know, our main shareholder, John Fredriksen, he's been in this shipping game now for 60 years. Of course, he have seen more cycles than most, if any. Of course, shipping moves in cycles, you know. Some Wall Street bankers might tell you differently, this time it's different, but they do. This also reflects newbuilding prices, and they are pretty elevated now. Given the backlog the yards have and the price pressure on inflation and such, we think they will stay elevated. We are not gonna rush to the yards, ordering new ships. We're gonna focus on the ships we have. We have some ships coming open the next couple of years. I mentioned Rainbow and Amber, Enterprise, and we think we are well-positioned to lock them in on attractive rates. As I mentioned, term rates are holding up very well. Our focus is on existing fleet. Why are we then adding so much liquidity to our balance sheet? It's pretty simple. Credit terms for good top-tier customers like us are very good these days. I haven't seen as good financing market since 2014, just before the oil price slump. Before that, I saw it back in 2007 when before the financial crisis hit, where you know banks were handing out money everywhere. We, as a very good client, can access cheap capital at good terms. We are now pushing out maturities. We're adding flexibility with revolvers, which means that we can have access to a lot of liquidity without having to draw the debt and pay the full interest expenses of the credit commitments. This enable us some financial flexibility and financial freedom, and it also enable us to continue to pay very good dividends, even though our earnings is a bit disappointing in Q1. It's more about having ability also to tap the market when the credit markets are good. We do see that the Fed is tightening the policy, both in terms of interest rates and quantitative easing. If you look at the most history in terms of recessions and contractions in stock markets, it's driven by Fed policies. You know, we think it's smart to take some money when it's available. As I mentioned, we don't need to pay for it unless we use it. The commitment fee on the revolver is very attractive. We keep it in spare and we think it's a good insurance premium, and it gives us some strategic ability to also pursue some opportunities if they were to arise. That said, we are not planning to use this as a credit card to go to the yards. There's a question on what kind of mix of fuels is the fleet currently using? Mix of fuel? Of course, it's compliant fuel. It's, I would say, of course. Okay, let's just do the basics here. When we are taking an LNG cargo, that cargo is, like, minus 162 degrees, so 260 Fahrenheit, minus 260 Fahrenheit. Of course, our ship is a thermos with a propeller. Thermos are not perfect. They are close to perfect now or at least economically perfect because our boil-off rate is much less than it used to be in the past. We use this boil-off from the cargo tanks to fuel our ships with LNG. Then you use some pilot fuel, typically marine diesel oil or marine gas oil. Recently, with the elevated LNG prices, which have been trading at big premiums to oil, even though oil prices have been high, we have seen some more heel out being done by charters, where actually you are not retaining part of the cargoes to use to cool down the tanks and use for fuel. You are heeling them out entirely and then rather burning typically marine diesel oil or marine gas oil. I would say mostly it's LNG. When you have periods where LNG prices are elevated, it could also be some compliant fuel. All right. Can we round up with the two last questions? Yeah. One is guiding for the cash breakeven level for 2022, and the second part of it is it possible to switch into more fixed rate contract arrangements? Okay, let's do the fixed rate contract. You know, we did eight or nine fixed rate time charters last year. We think it will be nine because we do expect, you know, Cheniere to take the fifth vessels when you look at what the term rates are being quoted today. I think we already shifted a lot of our revenue base to fixed rate contracts. This has mostly been driven by the fact we have been optimistic on the spot market. You know, back in 2019 and 2020 when the spot market was not that good, we elected to do variable time charters and short-term time charters and spots in order to have exposure to the market because we thought it was gonna improve. When we saw the improvement materializing during last year, we elected to fix a big chunk of our revenues to fixed rate contracts. Whether we will do it again for the remaining ships really depends on what we think we can achieve. You know, we like to keep some exposure to the spot market. But then, you know, we will see. We do expect most of our, as we also shown in the graph there, most of our revenues are now fixed higher. Might increase more, but really depends on the terms on the table. The other question was about our cash break-even, yeah. Okay. We guided, I believe when we presented a year ago, we guided 45,300 for 2021, and we delivered below that at 44,000, even though COVID-19 related OpEx expenses were $600 per day, which was a bit higher than expected. But of course, LIBOR stayed at more or less zero during 2021, so interest expenses were very favorable. I think if you look at 2022, I think if you are assuming at around $45,000, it should be on target. As Knut mentioned, even though we now raised $125 million through our balance sheet optimization program, we are not increasing our debt service cost. This is driven by a couple of factors. One is that, of course, we have got very good, attractive terms. Number two, we have been able to stretch some of our repayment profiles. Number three, we have structured a lot of the financing with revolving credit facilities, where we don't really have to draw all the debt all the time. There's no reason for us to sit with $200 million of cash all the time. We can repay that under the revolvers and save some interest expenses. It seems like alchemy. You can get $125 million without increasing your financing costs, but it's really a reflection of the fact that banks are also seeing that we have really de-risked the company, and then they are also willing to provide us with more favorable terms. Yeah. Or do you want to add something to that, Knut? No, I think you covered it well. If your questions were unanswered, we will look into it and respond to all of those who are not. If you have any further questions, you please send an email to ir@flexlng.com. Okay, thank you everybody for listening in. We will be back with Q1 numbers in May. I hope you can join the conference then as well. Have a good day. Thanks. That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may all disconnect. Have a nice day.