Good day, and welcome to the Q3 2022 Flowserve Corporation earnings conference call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Jay Roueche, Vice President, Investor Relations and Treasury. Please go ahead. Thank you, Elaine, and good morning, everyone. We appreciate you participating in our conference call today to discuss Flowserve's Q3 2022 financial results. On the call with me this morning are Scott Rowe, Flowserve's President and Chief Executive Officer, and Amy Schwetz, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Following our prepared comments, we will open the call for questions. As a reminder, this event is being webcast and an audio replay will be available. Please note that our earnings materials do, and this call will include non-GAAP measures and contain forward-looking statements, and these statements are based upon forecasts, expectations, and other information available to management as of November 1, 2022, and they involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the company's control. We encourage you to fully review our safe harbor disclosures, as well as the reconciliation of our non-GAAP measures to our reported results, both of which are included in our press release and earnings presentation and are accessible on our website at flowserve.com in the Investor Relations section. I would now like to turn the call over to Scott Rowe, Flowserve's President and Chief Executive Officer, for his prepared comments. Thanks, Jay, and good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining our Q3 earnings call. Let me start by saying that no one is more disappointed than I am about the performance in the Q3. Our results this period do not reflect what Flowserve is capable of delivering, nor are they representation of what we expect going forward. The Q3 was impacted by a number of items, some of which are self-inflicted, some were strategic decisions, and other were one-time events that came to fruition in the quarter. As a result, we delivered Q3 adjusted EPS of only $0.09. In addition to the $0.19 of ERP systems issues and corporate expense items that was disclosed in our September update, we also incurred other unexpected costs and headwinds in late September that further deteriorated our margins and earnings, such as higher than expected bad debt and under absorption expenses, as well as project true-up costs coming from inflation-related impacts in our highly engineered businesses. Our results were also impacted by an increase in R&D expense that we believe to be a very positive long-term growth driver for Flowserve. Late in the Q3, we commenced a formal partnership with Chart Industries related to hydrogen fueling pumps. As part of the agreement, we acquired their in-process research and development technology, and this purchase was immediately expensed in our Q3 SG&A, as noted in our Form 10-Q. Despite the negative impact to the quarter's adjusted EPS, we moved expeditiously to close this agreement given the benefits derived to both companies, including a five-year agreement to supply Chart with these pumps upon commercialization. We believe having this technology will further increase our capabilities in hydrogen, and we also expect that the opportunities available to Flowserve in the high-growth hydrogen markets extend well beyond this initial agreement. While the impact to our results for the quarter for these items was significant, we believe most of these items will not impact future performance. First, the North American enterprise systems issues that impacted our highly profitable operations during the Q3 was remedied by mid-September. Since then, we've continued to operate at or above pre-conversion levels, and we do not expect this headwind to persist going forward. The corporate expenses were also distinct to the Q3 and should not reoccur in the Q4. Likewise, the purchase of the hydrogen technology investment we made is clearly a quarter specific charge that we do not anticipate repeating. Lastly, the elevated bad debt charges of the Q3 are expected to subside. Those are certainly the easy ones to identify. Additionally, from an operational perspective, I am encouraged that many of the supply chain and personnel challenges that plagued us for the last year and impacted our ability to plan and meet lead times have continued to stabilize and improve. Part of this improvement is a direct result of the targeted actions we have taken to improve our supply chain management and build greater resiliency and redundancy in our facilities to support our customers and meet their expectations more consistently. Our efforts are not complete, and we continue to see opportunities to improve lead times for certain procured items, such as electronics, motors, and some castings. As we continue to make progress with planning and lead times become more predictable, we expect our revenue conversion and margins to improve. Let me assure all of our shareholders that we fully recognize that Flowserve's recent performance has not met our own expectations or those of our shareholders. We have to significantly improve our execution and our ability to work through the challenges of today's complex environment. While we have made a lot of changes and improvements to how we operate, our execution in the Q3 overshadows that progress that we are making. We fully expect to deliver better results going forward. Combining the discrete items that are not expected to recur with our strong backlog and overall healthy end market environment, we do see a clear pathway to delivering improved results. We know we must execute to get there, and this management team and I are committed to doing just that. Let me now turn to our Q3 bookings. We capitalized on high activity levels and delivered Q3 bookings of $1.2 billion, which is the highest quarterly level since 2014, and it represents a year-over-year increase of 34%. These strong bookings were anchored by 2 large project awards totaling approximately $250 million. Additionally, our traditional run rate bookings in aftermarket and MRO, as well as our continued success with diversification, decarbonization, and digitization awards, remained healthy throughout the period. Despite increasing economic uncertainty, we continue to have a strong funnel of project opportunities at levels very similar to a year ago, driven by energy transition activities and the global need for energy security. Some of the larger projects we were awarded this quarter included a roughly $220 million award to supply highly engineered and industrial pumps to support the Jafurah Gas development project in Saudi Arabia. We have a well-thought-out execution plan with strong project management in place, and we are excited to be part of this significant development. Additionally, in our water markets, we booked over $30 million of engineered pumps for a pipeline that facilitates the use of desalinated seawater for copper mining activities in Chile. With the continued focus on energy security and independence, we have participated in the resurgence in the nuclear power markets and booked a handful of pump and valve orders in North America and Korea, primarily for nuclear maintenance, upgrades, and life extension activities. Finally, we were awarded numerous oil and gas orders in the $5-$10 million range, primarily in emerging regions, to improve energy security and efficiency. Given the size and duration of the Jafurah award, I'd like to provide some additional color on the project in our partnership with Aramco. This massive natural gas processing facility is expected to produce 2 billion cubic feet of gas per day by 2030, as well as provide feedstock for hydrogen and ammonia production. Our long-standing pump frame agreement with Aramco helped secure a significant amount of this award, this work. We have improved our project quoting process and enhanced our project management capabilities to ensure that we deliver the margins that we are entitled to for this large project. With our success on Jafurah, as well as a number of other large projects, both of original equipment bookings increased over 60% versus prior year to $680 million, which represents our highest OE bookings level since 2014. Despite the strong dollar, we generated $544 million in aftermarket bookings, which represents a year-over-year increase of almost 10% and over 16% on a constant currency basis. Our aftermarket and MRO bookings have remained strong all year, and we help operators maintain higher productivity and output levels of their existing assets. Turning briefly to our bookings performance by end market and on a constant currency basis given the continued strengthening of the U.S. dollar. Our oil and gas bookings were up nearly 80%, reflecting large project awards and continued strength in the upgrade and revamp environment. Power bookings increased over 19%, supported by nuclear maintenance and life extensions and a nice hydropower award. Both chemical and general industries were up 15%, while our water bookings roughly doubled on the large water pipeline award I highlighted earlier. From a regional perspective, our Q3 bookings growth included all regions. The Middle East and Africa was up over 160%, again, driven by the large award in Saudi Arabia. North America, Europe, and Latin America delivered healthy growth of 20%, 31%, and 41% respectively. Finally, Asia Pacific bookings increased a modest 7%. I am encouraged by the activity levels we've seen thus far in 2022 in both our traditional end markets as well as with the success we've delivered through our 3D strategy. We believe that the outlook going forward remains promising. We will continue to support long-standing customers while at the same time targeting energy transition opportunities in previously underserved markets where we expect higher growth. Near-term visibility supports our view of continued year-over-year bookings growth in the Q4 in both MRO and project work, and we expect to secure another quarter of over $1 billion in orders. The combination of this improved global demand environment and the disruption of energy supplies in Europe has driven significant activity around energy security, particularly in our traditional oil and gas, nuclear, and LNG markets. Additionally, the ongoing focus on decarbonization of existing assets as well as clean energy solutions continue to provide incremental opportunities targeted by our 3D growth strategy. The concerns and uncertainty around a prolonged inflationary environment and the increased probability of recession risk somewhat soften our outlook for growth. These conditions are most prevalent in Europe, driven by the significant increase in energy costs and energy security risks as well as a weakened currency. We expect the impact of a potential recessionary environment would primarily impact our GDP-driven markets, including chemicals and general industries, where we have seen solid year-to-date constant currency bookings growth of 12% and 7% respectively. However, based on our visibility into continued strong booking opportunities in other markets, including increased investment in energy security and decarbonization activity, we feel reasonably well positioned for growth in 2023. Looking forward, the strong OE and aftermarket bookings we delivered in the quarter produced a backlog that exceeds $2.6 billion, reaching the highest backlog level since 2015. This level of work under contract, combined with our expectations of a continued supportive demand environment, provide us with the opportunity to deliver strong top-line growth and margin improvement as we move forward. With that, let me now turn the call over to Amy to address our Q3 in more detail and our expectations for the Q4. I will conclude the call with remarks on our 3D strategy and comments on positioning Flowserve for success in 2023. Amy? Thanks, Scott, and good morning, everyone. First, I would like to start by echoing Scott's sentiment that we are acutely aware our Q3 results are not acceptable, and they are further obscured by the previously disclosed discrete expenses, including the purchase of in-process R&D and some other items which we do not expect to recur. Absent these items, our Q3 would have looked much more like our Q2 results, and it would have been even better had we not seen a pickup in bad debt expense as well as headwinds from an increase in estimates to complete certain projects. In the Q3, our reported EPS of $0.29 exceeded our adjusted earnings per share, primarily due to $30 million of below-the-line FX gains. Excluding the FX gain, as well as the $2.7 million benefit from cash collected on a previously excluded asset write-down, our adjusted EPS was $0.09. With another strong quarter of bookings, our backlog at September 30 was up 30% since year-end to $2.6 billion, driven by a year-to-date book-to-bill ratio of 1.3. If not for the continued strength of the US dollar, backlog would have been even higher by approximately $140 million. This solid foundation, coupled with our outlook for supportive end markets, provide the foundation for our expectation that revenues and earnings will improve in the coming quarter and in full year 2023. As Scott highlighted, we are encouraged by the combination of tailwinds from traditional end markets and the accelerated growth from our 3D strategy, which delivered a constant currency bookings increase of over 40% year-over-year. Original equipment orders, which were up 63% year-over-year, or over 70% on a constant currency basis, drove the increase, with FPD's OE bookings more than doubling versus prior year on the return of large project orders. FCD also contributed with a 24% constant currency increase that included particular strength in power, where total bookings were up 66% in this end market that included a few nuclear orders totaling $16 million. Aftermarket bookings were $544 million, up 16% on a constant currency basis. Both segments contributed solid growth, with FPD up 14% and FCD up 28%. Despite the stronger dollar, the Q3 marked the fourth consecutive quarter with aftermarket bookings exceeding $500 million, as operators continue to catch up on previously deferred maintenance and avoid costly unplanned downtime while still running their facilities at high utilization rates. In fact, despite the strengthening US dollar, this quarter's aftermarket bookings were the highest quarterly level since the Q4 of 2014. We are pleased that for the first time in two years, Flowserve delivered year-over-year growth in reported revenues. Excluding the effect of the strengthening US dollar, revenues were up 7.2% on a constant currency basis. This growth was driven by the aftermarket, with both segments up in the 10% range, reflecting the strong MRO and aftermarket environment over the last year and stabilization in our operations. FCD also contributed 14% constant currency OE growth, while FPD declined roughly 5% on the same basis. Regionally, North America's constant currency revenue growth of roughly 13% included 23% and 9% growth in FCD and FPD, respectively. The Middle East and Africa contributed 30% growth on FPD's strong 39% increase. Europe also contributed solid growth of 10%, with FCD up 15% and FPD up 8%. However, growth in these regions were partially offset by declines in Asia Pacific and Latin America at 8% and 18%, respectively. Turning now to margins. Q3 adjusted gross margin decreased 220 basis points year over year to 27.4%. The decline was driven by the Q3 specific disruption in our highly profitable North American seals business due to the ERP system conversion, which resulted in roughly $5 million of unabsorbed costs and deferred an estimated $30 million in revenue and associated margins. The adjusted gross margin was further impacted by a $1 million non-cash lease accounting adjustment. Other contributors to the margin challenge included an approximate $2 million project write-down, primarily on aged backlog, almost $3 million related to the effects of increased costs on our estimates to complete certain large projects, and higher freight costs, which were partially offset by a 200 basis point shift in mix to aftermarket and the impact of our price increases earlier in the year. Q3 reported gross margins decreased 190 basis points to 27.4% due to the headwinds discussed earlier, partially offset by a $3 million decline in adjusted items. Q3 SG&A increased $23 million to $224 million due to certain discrete items of roughly $18 million, primarily for incurred but not reported expenses related to our annual actuarial assessment, the non-cash lease accounting adjustment, and the in-process R&D technology investment. This unusual activity led to inflated adjusted SG&A as a percentage of sales, with the calculation increasing 250 basis points to 25.6%. On a reported basis, Q3 SG&A increased $20 million year-over-year, including the impact of the charges I just mentioned, partially offset by the reduction in adjusted items of $3 million. Q3 adjusted operating margins decreased 460 basis points to 2.4% year-over-year due to FPD's decrease of 420 basis points, while FCD's adjusted operating margin was flat with the prior year at 10.5%. The margin was further impacted by the elevated corporate costs in SG&A that I just discussed. Q3 reported operating margin declined 380 basis points year-over-year to 2.8%, as the previously discussed challenges were partially offset by a $6 million decrease in adjusted items. Our Q3 adjusted tax rate of -63% was due to a benefit from the mitigation of tax liabilities reported in prior periods and this quarter's low levels of pre-tax income. Turning to cash flows, Q3 operating cash was a use of $38 million, primarily due to increased working capital of $75 million to support our strong backlog growth and the shipment challenges in certain of our facilities. We have invested nearly $150 million of cash year to date for inventory, including net contract assets and liabilities to support the roughly $600 million increase in this year's backlog level, and to assist in minimizing any future supply chain concerns. The combination of strong bookings growth and improved project environment and the frictional issues delaying shipments, including the impact of the ERP conversion, has impacted our working capital as we look to capitalize on the strong demand environment. As you would expect, the growing backlog and shipment delays have also impacted working capital as a percentage of sales. With the Q3 ticking up 230 basis points sequentially to 32.2%. Despite this increase, I am pleased that we continue to lower the total inventory, including net asset and contract liabilities as a percentage of backlog, which now stands at 29.5%, our lowest level in over five years. Lastly, other material uses of cash in the quarter included dividends of $26 million, capital expenditures of $15 million, and debt reduction of approximately $8 million. As most of you know, Flowserve traditionally delivers strong cash generation in the Q4, and we expect this seasonal dynamic to again play out in Q4. Turning now to our outlook for the Q4. We expect revenue growth of 8%-10% year-over-year. This higher level is supported by our increased backlog, a reasonably stable to improving operating environment in our facilities, and the resumption of normal operating levels in our highly profitable North American Seals and Aftermarket business. The revenue forecast also includes a 2%-3% headwind versus our prior Q4 expectations due to the increased strength of the US dollar since our previous outlook. Based on the improvement shipment levels and the $0.22 of items impacting the Q3 that are not anticipated to repeat in the Q4, we expect to close the year with reported and adjusted EPS of at least $0.40, which would imply adjusted operating margins in the 8%-10% range. This margin level is less than we anticipated earlier in the year. The decline in expected margins is attributed to lower absorption in our engineered facilities due to the timing of large project bookings that we had anticipated occurring earlier in the Q3, which would have allowed for more absorption, revenue recognition, and associated margins in the Q4. Additionally, lower margins on percentage of completion backlog and the continued strength of the US dollar have moderated our expectations. While we fully expect our North American Seals business to perform at first half shipment levels, we are not anticipating the Q4 ramp in shipments that was incorporated into our prior thinking. However, we continue to believe that the strong sequential Q4 movement that we are expecting will position us well as we look to improve financial performance in full year 2023. With the modest realignment planned in the Q4, we expect our reported EPS to look very similar to adjusted EPS. Both the reported and adjusted EPS target range also assume current foreign currency rates, reasonably stable commodity prices, the continuation of our current market conditions, no significant improvement in the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and no disruption due to European energy supply constraints. Although we are expecting substantial sequential revenue and earnings growth in the Q4, we do not expect this growth to carry our full year results, and we are not willing to let the shortfalls of this year carry over into 2023 without taking actions. I'll now turn the call over to Scott to discuss our progress on strategy, our outlook, and planned actions to improve our performance in 2023. Thanks, Amy. Before closing with our outlook for the remainder of the year, let me provide an update on the progress of our three D growth strategy focused on diversification, decarbonization, and digitization, which aligns exceptionally well with today's market environment. I am pleased with the progress and momentum our three D strategy has provided, where bookings in these targeted markets have exceeded our expectations. I would like to spotlight a few three D awards from the quarter. In the diversified category, we won a water pipeline project in Chile, providing water from the Pacific Ocean to a large copper mine, which is 195 kilometers and more than 4,000 vertical meters away. This project will preserve the freshwater natural resources in the Andes Mountains. Shifting to the decarbonization leg of the strategy, Flowserve's extensive capabilities and vast installed base position us well to support our customers' CO2 reduction and energy transition plans. The increasing government incentives to reduce carbon emissions are having a significant impact on the overall growth in this market. We have seen our energy transition project funnel grow roughly 70% since the beginning of the year. Flowserve continues to lead in CCUS as well, where we are seeing the uptake on our technology gain further traction. Flowserve is participating in a number of these projects around the world, and we expect continued activity in this area for the foreseeable future. As an example, Flowserve was recently awarded contracts to supply pumps and valves for a large project to capture CO2 from 32 methanol plants across the Midwest and transport it to North Dakota for permanent storage. Another example of decarbonization is in Hawaii, where Flowserve is providing equipment in the West Kauai Energy Project for comprehensive integrated, renewable energy, and irrigation. Flowserve's pumps will enable the hydropower and pumped storage components of this project, supporting Hawaii's path to 100% renewable energy. Finally, on digitalization, we continue to make good progress in the Q3, where we instrumented roughly 125 assets and now have over 1,625 assets instrumented around the world. Other significant advances include the instrumentation of SIHI vacuum and liquid ring pumps and the ability to monitor sealing systems and control valves. In one recent example, we installed RedRaven, one of the world's largest desalination plants in the Middle East, where we instrumented 22 critical process pumps. The latest commissioning represents the third desal facility we are now supporting with RedRaven technology. Before closing, I would like to highlight another recent technology development we are excited about, as well as some additional comments around the hydrogen pump technology acquisition. In the Q3, we brought our FLEX isobaric energy recovery device to the market, following nearly a year of extensive field testing. With its proven efficiency and compact envelope, the combination of FLEX with our high-efficiency pumps and valve offerings represents a comprehensive product offering to support the growing desalination market. While initially designed for desalination, we believe there are other industry applications for the FLEX technology that we will pursue in due time. We are enthusiastic about the opportunity to leverage the R&D efforts that Chart commenced on hydrogen dispensing pumping technology and expect that we will be able to bring the product to commercialization in the second half of 2023. This product will be a critical piece of the equipment for liquid hydrogen fueling stations and allows Flowserve to build out other related products across the hydrogen value chain. As we look toward 2023, we believe Flowserve is well-positioned to convert on our existing $2.6 billion backlog, which currently sits at $600 million more than the beginning of the year. Even with only modest book-to-ship assumptions in 2023, Flowserve's revenue should grow at approximately 10% year-over-year. While we will see a meaningful shift back to more original equipment revenue, our aftermarket backlog remains high, providing significant opportunity to convert this high-margin business to revenue within the year. To address the persistent inflation that we have experienced throughout 2022 and the potential recession concerns in Europe and the United States, we are putting together a roughly $50 million cost reduction plan that includes both variable and structural costs. We intend to provide more details of this program and the timing of execution during our Q4 earnings call, but we are planning for a large percentage of the savings to be executed within 2023. Our strong backlog should enable revenue growth of approximately 10% in 2023, and the cost-out program will ensure that we capture the margin expansion and incremental margins that we have historically come with top-line growth. We are currently in the middle of our 2023 planning process, and as usual, we will provide full-year 2023 guidance on the next earnings call. In summary, our Q3 performance did not meet our expectations. We are confident this quarter's discrete items will not continue and fully believe we will make meaningful progress in our ability to execute. We expect to see significant improvement in the 2022 Q4 with the de-risk plan that we shared earlier in our prepared remarks. Further, as we achieve higher levels of conversion on our robust backlog, we should be in a strong position to grow our margins and return to a more normal level of profitability. I am confident in our team and our ability to move beyond the Q3 to begin to grow both our revenue and our profitability. We have the right building blocks in place, and it is on us to deliver. Operator, this concludes our prepared remarks, and we'd now like to open the call to questions. Thank you. If you would like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. If you're using a speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off to allow your signal to reach our equipment. Again, press star one to ask a question. We'll pause for just a moment to allow everyone an opportunity to signal for questions. We will take our first question from Deane Dray from RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Hello, Deane. Hey, maybe we could just start to get these out of the way to address the unexpected discrete items in the quarter, and maybe we can just separate what's, you know, self-inflicted and not. When I look at the chart view of the capitalizing R&D, that's fine. I mean, it sounds like a great opportunity on the hydrogen side. You're supposed to do that every day. The FX, everyone is up against this. That's not self-inflicted, so I'll just take those off the table. On the profit margin, on the percentage of completion and the aged receivables, both of those strike me as a bit of a forecasting issue. You know, you might have known that you were a bit aggressive, or the chances of those aging more and not being paid this quarter could have happened. How much of this is a forecasting for those two items, and any kind of action plan to address that? May we start there? Thanks. Sure. Yeah, thanks, Dean. I'll start, and then I'll let Amy hit a couple of things that I miss here. You know, the previously announced and the one-time items are clearly the ERP conversion, the corporate one-time expenses, all those were pre-announced and then the R&D acquisition. Then the other late quarter items, like you said, are the bad debt expense and the project true-up cost. I'll hit the project true-up. I'll let Amy fill in any blanks there, and then she can address the bad debt. On these projects, especially in the engineered environment, they're long cycle projects. What we've seen is an inflationary environment all year. Whether that's materials, labor, energy costs in Europe, those have continued to go up. In a lot of our projects, you know, we review these every month. We do quarterly reviews and assessments on our estimate at completion, and we typically do a good job forecasting what that cost model looks like. Then unfortunately, we did this later in the quarter, and what we saw was more inflation, primarily in Europe, but also some of our North American pro-projects as well come in. You know, given the inflationary environment and the concerns in the future, we bumped up the cost for a lot of these projects. Amy, do you wanna add anything else on the projects, and I'll let you hit bad debt? Sure. I think, you know, as we've said before with respect to large projects, we do try and lock in as much of the cost as we can. Unfortunately, in the current environment, we have seen some of the costs that we can't necessarily lock in the areas where we've seen high inflation, and that's what's being addressed in some of these adjustments in the Q3. With respect to the aging items that are reflected, I think we try and do a real bottoms-up forecast of cash collections each quarter. That happens at a site and at a platform level. In some instances, we had customers that had promised to pay fairly large receivables that didn't happen at the end of the quarter. They're high-quality customers. We believe that it will, and in some cases has already happened, in the Q4. This is unfortunate that it was something that snuck up on us in the Q3, but we don't anticipate that's gonna continue in the Q4 and beyond. Okay. All right, let's just shift over on to the positive side here. On the Q3 bookings, can you give us a sense of the implied margins? Just, you know, are there any challenges or impediments in the conversion and timing of the conversion of these orders? Sure. Obviously, you know, the $1.2 billion is a big number for us. There is a significant amount of projects that were booked. I would say we're excited about the profile of those projects. I would say, you know, the environment around pricing on projects is still competitive, and so we are being selected. You know, obviously the Jafurah one, which I hit in our prepared remarks, is a very large project. We've been working on that now for nine months. We had lots of focus on making sure our costs were correct. We've got a margin position in there that we're excited about, and we put substantial contingency for inflation in that project as well. You know, I feel reasonably good about the project bookings that are in there. I would say, you know, Jafurah is a multi-year project that's gonna take two years to execute. A lot of these projects are relatively standard in terms of the product configuration. Not a heavy engineering mix, not a lot of technical risk, and things that we can execute reasonably quickly. You know, overall, we're excited about what we booked in the quarter. You know, kind of going back to your previous question, Dean, you know, we're really focused now on securing, you know, the price of the bought out items early in the project life to make sure that there's no risk there. We've been putting more and more contingency in the projects themselves to make sure that we can offset the inflationary environment. I feel better about the work that we've booked today than what we booked last year, in terms of how we go forward. Great. I just have one specific question to follow up. The FLEX isobaric system is getting a lot of attention. People were talking about it at the WEFTEC conference. Is this a replacement to the Dwyer technology or is it complementary to it? Yeah. It's a good point and I'm glad you brought this up and recognize that we do have pressure exchange out there with Dwyer. That's been a legacy technology. It's a linear technology, and FLEX is a rotating or rotary technology. These are complementary, and we can use both in conjunction to get the best efficiencies. We really like this portfolio now. FLEX offers a very compact, highly efficient rotary pressure exchange device. Dwyer is a little bit bigger, but it's linear and can be used in different applications. When you combine that now with our high efficiency pumps and RedRaven, we really believe we've got something that can differentiate us in, you know, large, highly efficient, energy-dependent water markets like desalination. Now we obviously, we wanna move beyond desalination, and there's other areas like industrial wastewater, refrigeration, HVAC, that we also believe we can expand the pressure exchange technology to. We're really excited about our capabilities and what we can do here. That's great to hear. Best of luck. We will take our next question. Please go ahead from Michael Halloran from Baird. Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking the questions. You on the margin side of things, kind of a two-parter. First, you know, wide range, 8%-10% Q4 margins on the EBIT side. Maybe talk about, you know, what the iterations are to get to the upper end of that range and what would have to happen to get to the lower. Then how should we think about what the right stepping off point is here? Obviously, a lot of these disruptions should go away. You're confident in the profitability of the profile in the backlog you're gonna be executing on a cost improvement plan as you work through next year. Any help you could provide on how to think about the jumping off point for margins would be helpful as well. Sure. A few items just to highlight in terms of that margin range that, or maybe expand on from my remarks. We talked about those large order bookings that we saw in the Q3. It did occur later in the Q3 than we'd originally anticipated. Some absorption that we had anticipated coming through in some of our ETO plants, as well as delays in recognition of revenue and profit on these POC costs, is one of those items that brought our expectations down. We've talked about the U.S. dollar a fair bit. It's a headwind for us as we make our way into the Q4. Then some of our costs on these POC projects, that we're seeing creep up over time. I will comment just around conversion and the fact to get to that kinda upper end of the range or to exceed our $0.40 a share, what we really need to see happen is improvement in conversion rates around our North American seals business and frankly other businesses in the mix. We're anticipating in the Q3 or in the Q4 some improvement in our valves conversion rates on par with what we saw last year in the Q4. They've been very stable in the second and Q3 from a conversion standpoint. On their higher backlog, we've seen that translate into higher revenue. We're anticipating a bit of an uptick, but a relatively small one as we move from the Q3 into Q4 Then we're anticipating that our seals business performs in line with how it did in the first half of the year. We would normally anticipate that we'd see a nice uptick in the Q4, that seasonality, that Q4 surge within our business. Given what we experienced in the Q3, we've tempered our expectations around that uptick. I think we're all interested in delivering on the expectations that we've set out there. We've tried to de-risk this plan pretty substantially to make sure that we've got a number out there that we can hit. As we think about the movement going into 2023, Scott touched on some of these items in terms of how we're trying to think about large project orders in the future. That shift to OE is going to provide us some opportunities to really increase our absorption in some of our larger facilities that generally comes at slightly lower margins, but we're anticipating that absorption should be a real benefit for us over the course of the year. Obviously, we have been impacted in 2022 by a number of discrete items or a number of items associated with the operating environment that we expect should get much better in 2023. We're working through those numbers now and are excited to give guidance in early 2023 in terms of what that improvement will look like. Thank you. I appreciate the color there. Just some comments on the front log side of things. Obviously, really nice orders. Good to see the progression, and you certainly feel optimistic about the backdrop. You know, what are the customers saying at this point? Are you seeing any real movement in the front log or trend-wise one way or another, people pulling things in, people pushing things out? As you think about end market variability on a forward basis, any kind of thoughts underneath the hood about where there's a little more risk or a little bit more opportunity looking forward? Sure. I'd say, you know, the front log is always dynamic and, you know, there's no change or nothing's different today. With that said, you know, we feel reasonably confident about our path forward. In my prepared remarks, we talked about Q4 bookings being at, you know, over $1 billion again, which will be four quarters in a row for us, and we're excited about that growth. We see, you know, continued strong MRO and aftermarket in the Q4, as well as some projects. You know, obviously, the projects won't be as big as Q3 with some of the larger awards, but we continue to feel really good about that. As we move forward, we get concerned about some of the GDP-based business. This is our chemicals and general industries business. We're worried about Europe more than anywhere else. Some of those large chemical customers are already talking about concerns on their demand. We know that side slows down. The offset for us and the positive is energy security and decarbonization. On the energy security side, you know, we're seeing a global ramp up of traditional energy sources. This is oil and gas, potentially coal, you know, other types of energy, including LNG, but then also the unconventional energy and the new energy sources as well. You know, we feel like that these will continue to go forward and potentially offset any concerns on recessionary fears. You know, we're already seeing a revamp in all of the traditional forms of energy, including nuclear. The decarbonization lane is substantially active. We've seen a 70% increase in decarbonization activities. We think energy security plus the decarbonization offset any concerns of the GDP-based recessionary type risk. Great. Really appreciate it. Thank you. We'll take our next question from Andy Kaplowitz from Citigroup. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, everyone. Yeah. Hi, Andy. Scott, just maybe following up on that last comment. You already talked about Q4 bookings and this trade-off between energy transition bookings and maybe slower chemical general industries. Do you think the trade-off is positive enough where you could keep book-to-bill over one over the next several quarters? Just you booked this large Middle East project. Is that more of a one-off or are there a handful of these larger projects that you still see over the next several quarters? Sure. Yeah. I'd say right now, Andy, we do expect bookings growth. You know, will book-to-bill be greater than one? Not sure. You know, it depends how high we can push our revenue because we have substantial backlog. We'll provide that guidance on the Q4 earnings call when we go full year guidance. But then, you know, back to kind of these trade-offs, you know, the energy security is substantial, right? There's a lot of activity going forward on that. We do have visibility to larger projects, some in the nuclear space, some traditional oil and gas, and other things. I would say, you know, $200 million is a really large award for us. I don't anticipate that happening next year, but I can certainly see some larger projects in the $50 to $100 million range next year as they come through the system. There are big projects out there. There are big developments, again, mostly around energy security and bringing a localization to and security to energy, you know, in different parts of the world. On the decarbonization side, we're seeing so much activity. Most of these are smaller projects, but nobody's going to go backwards on their decarbonization and their ESG focus. A lot of that's driven by government regulation. Previous regulation in Europe is, you know, helping to start that movement. The Inflation Reduction Act in the United States is now generating all kinds of activity around CCUS and hydrogen. We're pretty constructive about the outlook there. Again, the two drivers for us will be energy security and the decarbonization lane. Very helpful. Scott, Amy talked about the contingencies put in Q4, but can you go into a little more detail into what you're doing or what you can do as CEO to cut down on the noise that seems to be quite frequent, when you report quarterly earnings? Can you change the reporting structure in some way, maybe even help you see problems faster before they develop, and how concerned should we be about continuing ERP transition? Sure. Let me just start with the forecasting and, you know, our ability to be, you know, more predictive of our financial results. You know, obviously, we have not done a good job of this. We are putting a lot of efforts into how do we get better at predicting, you know, and understanding our results. A lot of this is really around, you know, doing the right things at the plant level and then at the project level. We've changed how we're doing that throughout this year. We're doing more direct monthly plant reviews that have a very strict protocol on how that happens. Now we're reviewing all of the larger projects on a regular basis at the corporate level. I think as we kind of work through, you know, this dynamic and challenging time where lead times on a lot of our components have extended, you know, more than 2x, you know, we're getting better visibility. It's not showing up yet in our results, but I believe with the stability in the supply chain, our increased focus, we start to get far more accurate about what we can predict and understanding, you know, what we can do to deliver the results. Additionally, we're starting to put a lot more contingency in our plans. We talked about the de-risk plan in the Q4. We've talked about project contingencies. We'll continue to hedge back to make sure that we do deliver on what we commit. On the ERP side, you know, we talked, well, we pre-announced and we talked about it in September. That was roughly about $30 million of revenue that was lost in primarily July, but some in August as well. The September numbers were really good, and we're back to pre-conversion activity levels, and the October print was essentially the same run rate as September. We feel good about continued progress there. We still need to catch up the $30 million that was lost in the quarter. We believe we can potentially get some of that late in the Q4, but we didn't commit to that in our guidance that we put forward, but certainly by the first half of 2023. The team's doing a lot to continue to expand capacity with the North American seal business. We're throwing a lot of resources at it, and we're confident we get through this. Just as a reminder, we talked about this before, this is not necessarily a systems issue. The system is working fully. It's more around the training and uptake of how to use the system. You know, as a reminder, we've converted other parts of the seal business this year incredibly successfully. We did it in Q1 in Asia-Pacific, Q2 in Europe with no issues. It's really getting the North American team more comfortable. Equipping them with the training and the tools to use it properly. We're confident that, you know, we've turned the corner there. We don't go backwards. We've got to continue to ramp up capacity though, as we turn the corner into 2023. Yeah. Andy, I think some of your question might have been also related to, you know, how should we think about future implementations? Certainly we will be looking at this and are looking at this really closely to develop lessons learned. This is the single largest implementation that we could have done at this point in time. As we move forward, we're certain or we feel good about our ability to deliver on future implementations in a way that both incorporates learnings from this one, but also will come with less risks than this particular conversion had. Appreciate the color. We'll take our next question from Saree Boroditsky from Jefferies. Please go ahead. Thanks for taking my questions. You mentioned that you expected to see another quarter of a billion dollars in bookings. It'd be the fourth consecutive quarter. This seems to imply potentially higher than 10% sales growth into next year. Could you talk about how much of your backlog should convert into 2023? And maybe is there any conservatism in that number? Thank you. I'll start. I think Scott has talked about the fact that certainly as we make our way into 2023, we have an interest in increasing the velocity at which we're converting our backlog into revenue. The makeup of our backlog is a little bit different than what it looked like last year at this time, with a higher percentage of the backlog related to OE projects. Some of these OE projects will span the 2023 calendar year. We're beginning to see, you know, from our traditional backlog conversion rates in 2021 and 2022, we're gonna see lower conversion rates just based on the makeup of that backlog as we make our way into 2023. We certainly will be proactively pushing our improvement on conversion rates moving forward. Great. I guess assuming that 10% revenue growth into next year puts you around, what, $3.8 billion in sales. If I look back historically, that's similar to what you did in 2018. Do you think you can get operating margins to approach that 10% level? How do I think about the impact from cost savings since that time? We'll obviously give detailed guidance with respect to 2023 as we move into next year. What I would say is Scott has highlighted what we think that we need to do from a cost savings perspective. We know going into next year, we're gonna continue to see certain headwinds, and those headwinds are in the form of a strong dollar environment that we don't necessarily anticipate changing. We also see inflation, particularly in certain pockets around the organization being at relatively high levels. Part of what our goal is for the Q4 of this year is to really get those operating margins in that 8%-10% level. We've got the opportunity to have a strong jumping off point going into 2023 to expand margins beyond that. Great. Thanks for taking my question. We will take our next question from Nathan Jones from Stifel. Please go ahead. Good morning, everyone. Yeah. Hey, Nathan. I guess maybe following up to some of Saree's questions there on maybe some color on 2023. You guys have incurred a number of frictional costs this year related to, you know, increased inbound rate early in the year, some of the things that happened during the Q3. If you were to think about the net impact on your results this year, those kinds of things that maybe shouldn't recur in 2022, how much would the aggregate impact have been to 2022's results that maybe shouldn't repeat in 2023? Yeah. No, it's a really good question. You know, we're going through the budget process right now for 2023, and again, we'll put guidance out at the end of the Q4. You know, as you said, there's just been a number of things that have impacted us in the year. At the beginning of the year, Q1, we had COVID-related shutdowns. We had frictional costs on, you know, logistics, where we're paying 3x to ship things around the world. We had overtime. There was all kinds of stuff. Then obviously the ERP conversion and the one-offs in the Q3, we've you know, clearly called that out as discrete items. I think, you know, Nathan, you can build a bridge relatively easy to get to, you know, some nice margin improvement if we can get beyond all of the things that happened to us in 2022. These are the discussions we're having right now with the teams. It's, you know, it's kinda like guys, you know, what's the implied revenue? We know we're doing the right things on execution. We know we like the quality of the backlog, and so we've got to commit in our plans to drive margin expansion as we move beyond the friction and the noise of 2022. Okay. I guess I'll stay tuned for February then. Yeah. A couple questions. Yeah. Again, we'll provide that in the Q4 earnings call with the guidance. No worries. Maybe a couple questions around the Saudi project. Flowserve has had large project orders, you know, maybe not quite this big in historically, but has had large project orders. I think the project management around those kinds of things has probably been, you know, less than perfect historically, and they haven't realized the margins that have been baked into the pricing. Can you talk about any changes that are being made to how projects like that are being managed to ensure that you actually do realize the margins that have been priced into that bid? Yes. No, it's a really good question, Nathan. This is something we've been working on now for, gosh, probably three or four quarters. We've had visibility to this project since the beginning of the year, and, you know, given our relationship with Aramco, you know, we knew we were, you know, part of the frame agreement. We knew some of this was coming to us. Early on, we really strengthened our project tendering team. We put some of our best people on this to make sure that the quoting process was accounting for all of the costs, and that we were making sure that we would put the execution plan in place as we put the tender together. I'd say, to your point, this has not been a strength of Flowserve. We typically, you know, let one team do the project tendering and then another team do execution. In this one, we brought forward some of our best folks to really work on the execution plan prior to award. You know, I would just say Amy and I have done a monthly project review on this project now for six months, and so it's getting unbelievable scrutiny and attention. As we shift to execution, we've bolstered the execution team. We've changed our project management reporting to highlight risk in the project, progress in the projects, and critical milestones. Amy and I continue to do a monthly review now on project execution. You know, I'm not gonna say that this project is fully de-risked, but I feel far better about our ability to execute this than any projects that I've seen historically. Just, you know, a couple data points. You know, we booked this, you know, primarily in September. Some of it happened in August, but the majority of the long lead items are already now on purchase. You know, we've got contingency in the project, which we typically don't have a significant cost contingency in there, and we're executing to our plan thus far. You know, I think we're doing everything right early. Again, that early planning on execution, the contingency in the project, you know, focusing on the right things and having a fully designated project management team. You know, we'll continue to provide updates on this. This project will last probably, you know, two years for us to finish the last shipments. You know, we're really excited about our ability to deliver this and support Aramco, but also to deliver the margins that we deserve on this big project. This project by itself probably absorbs a reasonable amount of capacity, particularly on the engineered pump side, industry capacity as well as your capacity. Do you think this enables the industry to be a little bit more aggressive, with pricing and maybe realize a little more margin on pricing on projects going forward? Yeah, I sure hope so, Nathan. You know, it certainly does that for us. You know, we're in a much better position on capacity. We're gonna be even more selective as we go forward in terms of what we take and making sure that we can move our pricing and margins up. I would say, you know, we're seeing similar things with our peer group and competitors in terms of their bookings and backlogs coming up. I'm hopeful that 2023 has some better and more constructive pricing and discipline in the system. Thanks for taking my question. We will take our next question from Joe Giordano from TD Cowen. Please go ahead. Hi, everyone. Hey, Joe. I think we've kind of been dancing around in talking about this a little bit, but with all due respect, there does seem to be some sort of, like, breakdown of internal control somewhere. You know, I appreciate that you're taking more contingency on stuff at the management level on what you're hearing from the field, but is there some sort of, like, breakdown as to how things are being dealt with at the field level that needs to be structurally changed? Or like, how the people there are incentivized or how they're kind of going about their day-to-day? You know, look, we haven't forecasted as well as we should. There's no doubt that we've got to tighten up our ability to forecast our results. I'll just say, you know, the external environment has been incredibly challenging. It's been, you know, very frustrating for Amy and I as we go forward. I'd say, you know, these are things that we've got to do better. We continue to work with the organizations on, you know, how to predict and what to forecast. There's not a breakdown on internal controls. That's not happening. We're confident of that. You know, part of our cost out program is really going to be deriving organizational efficiency and having, you know, better role clarity and accountability. Those things, you know, we're definitely looking at as we look at, you know, how do we take costs out given the backlog that we have. I'd say, you know, this has been frustrating, right? We've got to make sure that we can deliver on our commitments. We believe that we're getting better. Sadly, the Q3, you know, kind of masked some of the underlying improvements that are there. We've got a de-risk plan in Q4 that we're very confident of achieving. You know, I think you see our execution start to improve dramatically as we turn the corner into 2023. When you talk about the cost out actions, the $50 million that you're talking about, you know, obviously you have a sprawling enterprise that's been built up through a lot of acquisitions over a long period of time. Is there anything, like, more fundamental that needs to be considered to address the operational structure going forward? Sure. No, it's a good point and, you know, it's a true statement. There's still a lot of complexity in our overall organization and the number of sites. We continue to look at taking, you know, facility consolidation and rationalization. You know, that's part of the plan is to make sure that we can, you know, have scale at the large sites that we have and making sure that they stay absorbed. That goes back to driving simplification, right? If we can get to a lower number there, then we've got, you know, the ability to focus and improve results on a few set of sites rather than a very broad spectrum. The other thing that we continue to look at, and part of the transformation that was very successful is the product portfolio and making sure that we've got a more rationalized and simplified set of products. That has been ongoing now for over a year and a half. We continue to push forward to a more configured set of products. We're not afraid to make decisions, you know, not only on customer projects where we don't get the margins that we deserve, but also on our offering and our product portfolio. If something doesn't make sense anymore or that market has changed dramatically, then we'll look at, you know, potentially moving out of that product line and focusing where we believe that we can get better margins and more predictability. If I could just sneak in one quick clarification. Like, can you just size what your expectation is for orders for hydrogen and nuclear, this year? Sure. Let me, I'll start with nuclear. This year, we've booked over $150 million year to date on nuclear. There are about $20 million of work in the quarter. You know, the nuclear market is looking good, and we expect to see continued work as we go forward on the nuclear side. You know, I'd say 2023 will bring, you know, an equal amount of opportunities for us on nuclear. On the hydrogen side, that is a really small part of our business today. We have booked a lot of valve work that we announced in the Q2 on hydrogen, and that's beginning to gain, you know, more progress. You know, obviously our partnership with Chart is gonna help us on the pumping technology and get us more into the distribution side of hydrogen. Then historically, you know, we've always participated on the downstream side where we've got gray hydrogen. You know, that work is still there, but most of that today is on the aftermarket side. We see, you know, the green hydrogen moving forward quickly. We're trying to evolve our portfolio to make sure that we can support that. You know, the step with Chart is the first step on the pumping side to make sure that we can participate fully in hydrogen. Thanks, guys. Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one. We will take our next question from Josh Pokrzywinski from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking the call. This is Toby on for Josh. Yeah. Hi, Toby. Wondering for Q2, how would you normalize four Q guidance for noise? I see that it still annualizes below where you expected EPS to be not that long ago. Seems like it's probably got some project accounting or lingering ERP issues or something else holding it back. Just a couple of things related to Q4 along those lines. Generally, we would see a ramp-up in sales volume in that seals portion of the business. We are anticipating that in the Q4, that we're delivering more at first-half rates in that area of the business. Through the noise of the Q3 there, but not really accelerating that conversion from what we saw in the first half of the year. We anticipate some of the issues that we saw in the first half of the year in terms of under absorption, still working their way through the system in the Q4 as we think about the timing of those large project bookings, and we still deal with some under absorption as we ramp up work in the plants in the Q4 of this year. Then I'd just kind of point out what we've stressed throughout the call, which is we are definitely presenting a plan for the Q4 that we feel confident that we can deliver. We have de-risked this plan in terms of trying to understand what those additional costs could be, whether or not that's inflationary or frictional costs in the system, and really trying to ensure that that is built into our estimate, as we make our way into the Q4. That's great. Thank you. It appears there are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the call back over to Scott Rowe for any additional or closing remarks. Thank you. We have no closing remarks. Thank you for participating on this, today's call, and we look forward to discussing other things at future investor events and on the Q4 call. Thank you. That will conclude today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, ladies and gentlemen. You may now disconnect.