Thank you. I would now like to turn the conference over to Steve Brazones. May we begin your conference? Thank you, Operator. Welcome to H.B. Fuller's first quarter 2025 Industry conference call. Presenting today are Celeste Mastin, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John Corkrean, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. After our prepared remarks, we will have a question-and-answer session. Before we begin, let me remind everyone that our comments today will include references to certain non-GAAP financial measures. These measures are supplemental to the results determined in accordance with GAAP. We believe that these measures are useful to investors in understanding our operating performance and to compare our performance with other companies. Reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to the nearest GAAP measure is included in our earnings release. Unless otherwise noted, comments about revenue refer to organic revenue, and comments about EPS, EBITDA, and profit margins refer to adjusted non-GAAP measures. We will also be making forward-looking statements during this call. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from these expectations due to factors covered in our earnings release, comments made during this call, and the risk factors detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, all of which are available on our website at investors.hbfuller.com. I will now turn the call over to Celeste Mastin. Celeste? Thank you, Steven, and welcome everyone. I'm encouraged by our first-quarter financial performance and positive organic sales growth. Despite weak overall market conditions, we remain focused on maintaining pricing discipline, driving market share gains, and effectively managing our cost structure. Simultaneously, we continue to execute our long-term strategic plan to optimize our portfolio mix and streamline our manufacturing cost structure to drive our business toward our greater-than-20% EBITDA margin target. As we look ahead, we remain cautious given weak overall market demand and unpredictable geopolitical conditions around the globe. Nevertheless, we are off to a solid start to the year and remain confident we can successfully adapt and execute in this dynamic environment to deliver both growth in organic sales and EBITDA for the year while expanding EBITDA margin. Looking at our consolidated results in the first quarter, organic revenue increased 1.9% year-on-year, driven primarily by positive volume trends. Consolidated pricing was also positive as our index-based pricing headwinds have subsided, and we made solid progress on our price increase efforts, particularly in HHC. From a profitability perspective, EBITDA of $114 million, which was at the high end of our guidance range, declined year-on-year as expected, and EBITDA margin was 14.5%, keeping in mind the first quarter is always our seasonally lowest margin quarter of the year. The impact of higher raw material costs more than offset positive pricing and volume leverage. As we progress through the year, we expect this trend to reverse, resulting in a favorable net benefit from price and raw material actions for the remainder of the year. Now, let me move on to review the performance in each of our segments in the first quarter. In HHC, organic revenue was up 4% year-on-year on solid volume growth and positive pricing. Volume was up low single digits, driven by strength in hygiene and flexible packaging. Pricing was also positive as delayed price increases from the fourth quarter began to be realized. The positive volume trends in HHC are very encouraging and primarily reflect market share gains. However, we anticipate that market dynamics in HHC will remain challenging and variable for the remainder of 2025 due to weak consumer demand. HHC's EBITDA margin of 12.7% was down versus last year, as expected, as volume growth and pricing actions were more than offset by higher raw material cost. We expect the price versus raw material dynamic to continue to improve throughout the year as we secure additional pricing gains and annualize against the impact of higher raw material cost. In engineering adhesives, organic revenue declined 2% in the first quarter. Strength in the electronics and automotive market segments was offset by ongoing challenges in solar. Excluding solar, organic growth was positive in the first quarter. EBITDA increased 16% in EA, and EBITDA margin increased 180 basis points year-on-year to 18.7%. Favorable net pricing and raw material cost actions, restructuring benefits, and the ND Industries acquisition drove the increase in EBITDA year-on-year. In Building Adhesive Solutions, or BAS, organic sales increased 2% year-on-year, driven by continued strength in roofing and improving trends in the infrastructure and mechanical market segment. EBITDA for BAS increased 2% year-on-year as volume gains and restructuring savings were partially offset by higher variable compensation. The first quarter for BAS is the seasonally lowest volume and EBITDA margin quarter. Geographically, Americas organic revenue was down 1% year-on-year, driven by declines in HHC and EA but largely offset by BAS, which achieved organic revenue growth of more than 8% year-on-year, driven by continued strength in roofing. In EMEA, organic revenue increased 4% versus the first quarter of last year, driven by double-digit organic growth in HHC. Our hygiene business performed especially well, with several new customer wins and easier comparisons due to currency restrictions in the Middle East in the first quarter last year. In Asia-Pacific, organic revenue increased 7% year-on-year. Strength in China was responsible for the majority of the growth in the Asia-Pacific region. Now, let me turn the call over to John Corkrean to review our first-quarter results in more detail and our outlook for 2025. Thank you, Celeste. I'll begin with some additional financial details on the first quarter. For the quarter, organic revenue was up 1.9% year-on-year, with volume up 1.7% and pricing up 0.2%. Currency had a negative impact of 3.4%, and acquisitions and divestitures decreased revenue by 1.2%. Adjusted gross profit margin was 29.6%, down 50 basis points versus last year, as volume gains and slightly higher pricing were offset by higher raw material costs. Adjusted selling, general, and administrative expense was up 2% year-over-year, with acquisitions and higher variable compensation driving the increase, partially offset by foreign exchange. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter of $114 million was down, as expected, versus last year, as volume gains, favorable pricing, and the contribution of acquisitions were more than offset by higher raw material costs, variable compensation, and unfavorable foreign exchange. Foreign exchange negatively impacted adjusted EBITDA by approximately $5 million year-on-year. Adjusted earnings per share of $0.54 was down versus the same quarter in 2024, driven by lower operating income. Cash flow from operations was down versus last year, as expected, driven by higher working capital needs associated with revenue growth. As previously communicated, cash flow delivery for 2025 is expected to be weighted to the second half of the year. Net debt to EBITDA of 3.5x at the end of the first quarter was up versus 3.1x at the end of 2024. Our long-term leverage target remains unchanged at less than 3x. During the first quarter, we repurchased 678,000 shares. Regarding our capital allocation strategy, we continually reassess the most effective and highest-returning uses of our capital. The recent volatility in the market has created an opportunity to prioritize share buybacks. We expect to continue to repurchase shares throughout the year on an opportunistic basis. As a result of this, as well as our commitment to achieving our targeted leverage range, we have temporarily slowed the timing of M&A transactions. With that, let me now turn to our guidance for the 2025 fiscal year. As a result of our solid start to the year, which was largely consistent with our expectations, we are reiterating our previously communicated financial guidance for fiscal 2025. Net revenue is expected to be down 2%-4%, with organic revenue flat to up 2% year-on-year. Adjusted EBITDA is expected to be in the range of $600 million-$625 million, equating to growth of approximately 1%-5% year-on-year. Combined, these assumptions result in full-year adjusted earnings per share in the range of $3.90-$4.20, equating to year-on-year growth of between 2% and 9%. We continue to expect full-year operating cash flow to be between $300 million and $325 million, weighted toward the second half of the year. Finally, based on the seasonality of our business, we would expect second-quarter EBITDA in the range of $150 million-$160 million. Now, let me turn the call back over to Celeste to wrap us up. Thank you, John. As we navigate the uncertainties of this year, we remain nimble in order to effectively execute in the current operating environment, focusing on what we can control. We are maintaining pricing discipline and being continuously selective about the markets we participate in while simultaneously leveraging our global sourcing infrastructure to maintain our competitive advantage and drive margin expansion. Our strategy to produce in the same region where we sell to customers results in optimal customer service and acts as a natural hedge against currency fluctuations. In the current environment, it also reduces our exposure to tariffs. In fact, on average, 97% of what we sell in a region is produced in the same region. Our unique operating model of sourcing, producing, and selling in region, as well as the scale of our raw material infrastructure, the fact that we make up an extremely small portion of our customers' overall cost of goods, and our customers' willingness to pay for innovation sets us apart from our peers in the coatings and specialty chemicals industries. From a strategic perspective, we are focused on streamlining our cost structure, improving our operational efficiency, and optimizing the mix of our portfolio. We are confident in our strategic direction and our ability to drive sustained growth in organic sales and EBITDA. Our profitability goals aren't dependent on a robust market-driven volume recovery but are instead company-specific self-help initiatives that we are well-positioned to execute upon. We look forward to providing you more information in the quarters ahead on these initiatives and a detailed update during our next investor day scheduled for October 20 later this year. That concludes our prepared remarks for today. Operator, please open the line for questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Again, if you would like to withdraw your question, press star one again. Thank you. Your first question comes from the line of Ghansham Panjabi with Baird. Ghansham, please go ahead. Thank you, Operator. Good morning, everybody. Morning, Ghansham. Morning. You know, obviously, there's a lot of stuff going on with the news flow and tariffs and so on and so forth. Can you just give us a sense as to what you're seeing from an operating condition standpoint as it stands today in terms of customers and how they're thinking about managing through this volatility? Also, maybe your sense as to whether there was any benefit in either 1 Q or early part of 2 Q from pre-buying, etc., in front of the April 2nd reciprocal tariffs? Yeah, absolutely, Ghansham. As to the question related to pre-buying, I do not think we are seeing that here in the United States or around the world, for that matter. Certainly, our customers have been cautious. They have been hesitant. They do continue to focus on innovation and new product development, which I think is very encouraging. As far as pre-buying, I think if we had seen pre-buying, it would have been in more of the durable goods types of products in the United States in particular. That market was very weak for us. I do not think we are seeing it at this point. Got it. As it relates to the market share comments, I think it was specific to HHC, I guess, in the consumer end markets business. Can you just give us a broader sense as to the competitive environment at this point? Also, give us an update on some of the previous callouts from before as it relates to solar weakness and the impact of hydrogen and hydrocarbons, I think, that impacted price mix, price cost, I should say. Can you repeat that last part of that question, Ghansham? Yeah, in terms of the impact of raw material cost inflation, I think you called out some unique movement in China as it relates to hydrogenated hydrocarbons. Yeah. Okay. Yeah. As far as market share, yeah, we have been gaining share in multiple segments across the portfolio. My comments were specific to HHC. Recalling HHC in that hygiene space in particular, we've really taken a step back and looked critically at where are the customers and the end applications where we should be playing? Where do we really create value, and how do we capture that value from customers? In the hygiene market in particular, the company has taken share with about five large global customers. They've done a really nice job repositioning. They've moved away from some of the cheaper Chinese baby diapers, and they're winning with innovation. In fact, we just had a win in Latin America where we were able to bring a product that uniquely benefited a customer with a fluffless core. We have seen some nice work out of the hygiene group there. In the solar space, it remains very competitive. What you are going to see throughout the course of the year is that revenue will be constrained in our solar business. However, you will see margins improve in that particular business. Again, it is a repositioning as we are moving away from the cheaper Chinese panels where technology is not valued as much as it is in some of the more higher-end panels that drive higher efficiency and customers that really desire the innovation that we can bring. As far as raw material inflation, yeah, we really saw kind of a big slug of that move through the portfolio in Q1. You saw it in Q4. We have seen the tail end of that in Q1, in particular in the HHC business. That was the reason for the compressed EBITDA margins in HHC. We are now at a point where we have moved that through the system, and we are in a much better position now to deliver on the $55 million of price and raw material cost benefits that we have guided to for the rest of the year. Perfect. Thank you. Very helpful. Your next question comes from the line of Kevin McCarthy with Vertical Research Partners. Kevin, please go ahead. Yes, thank you. Good morning, everyone. Celeste, just to follow- up on HHC, can you comment on your outlook for pricing there? If we take into account prospective pricing and the share gains that you referenced, how would you describe your level of confidence in restoring the segment EBITDA margin to, say, 15% or more? What are you baking in for the margin profile in HHC within your overall guidance? Thank you. Yeah. Thank you, Kevin. We're now at a point where we are going to continue to see improving margins in HHC throughout the rest of the year. They'll be more so up in that normalized range where they should be. Ideally, that business is operating in a 16%-17% EBITDA margin range. We did push through price increases, as I mentioned, in Q4 that got delayed because of the low volume in that quarter. We are starting to realize those now in Q1. You saw a little bit of that, and you'll continue to see more of that distributed throughout the year with, overall, for the business, a better raw material position. Kevin, thank you for that. I just wanted to give you a question on kind of assumptions on pricing and margin expectations. We've said that for the full year, we expect pricing to be up 1%-2%. The majority of that should come from HHC. You saw that they're starting to get some traction in that area in Q1. That should accelerate. From a margin standpoint, yeah, we would anticipate that the last three quarters of the year are going to be in that closer to 15%-17% EBITDA margin range as we execute that pricing and we see some of this unfavorable raw material impact subside. Okay. That's helpful. Maybe as a follow-up for you, John, it looks like working capital was an appreciable drag. I think last quarter you had signaled the back-end loaded nature of the cash flow profile for fiscal 2025. Water under the bridge, maybe you can just update us on your thoughts about working capital and your level of confidence in achieving that cash from operations range of $300 million- $325 million. I guess that would imply $350 million plus in the remaining nine months. Maybe you can just kind of talk through what you're seeing there. Yeah, sure. The cash flow story is largely a working capital story with the need to build some working capital related to this volume and pricing growth we're seeing. It is not surprising that we would see the increase in working capital. It is a little bit higher than we expected in Q1. Delivering on the full year, part of that will just be kind of getting into these normalized trends for Q2 through Q4. We also have some self-help actions to drive an improvement year on year in working capital as a percentage. That should improve steadily as we go throughout the year. The other big driver as we think about cash flow sequentially versus Q1 is just profit will increase as we go through the year. It's a little bit of a mirror of what we saw last year with raw materials being such a tailwind in the first half of the year and then a headwind in the second half. I'd say if you looked at our 2023 cash flow by quarter, it's a much better comparison to what we expect to see in 2025. Got it. Thank you very much. Thanks, Kevin. Your next question comes from the line of David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank. David, please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning. Good morning, David. Celeste, can you talk about March? Are you seeing a normal seasonal uptick in demand, or has there been some maybe push out into April given the trade and tariff uncertainties? Yeah. When you look at just maybe take a step back and we'll talk about progression through Q1, we had a strong P3 in Q1, so that would have been February. We're continuing to see progression like that throughout this quarter. We're not seeing customers push volumes out or move them forward. It's not really a volume story anyway. It's just like a slow, steady crawl of volume that we're experiencing in the market. Hey, David, just to give you a little bit of color because we've talked, I think, all the questions we've had right now also revolve around Q1 revenue performance and volume. As we said in our guidance, which is unchanged, we're expecting volume and pricing, organic revenue to be up 1%-2% with most of that from pricing. We've forecasted the rest of this year with pretty flat volume. We're not counting on kind of the improvement we saw in Q1. If that transpires, that'll be an upside. We're expecting that the volume growth in Q2 through Q4 will be a little constrained versus what it was in Q1. Very good. Just with leverage at three and a half turns and the macro uncertain, how are you thinking about debt reduction versus share buybacks for the rest of the year? Yeah. One of the comments that we made in the script was that we have delayed some of our M&A pipeline and the transactions therein. That is largely in response to the leverage that you just pointed out. Three and a half times stands out in this particular environment. We are moving a little more slowly there. On share buyback, we announced last year that we would be buying back shares to counteract the creep that we have due to our compensation plans. We accelerated those buybacks in the first quarter. In fact, now we are looking at share buyback very opportunistically. Very good. Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Mike Harrison with Seaport Research Partners. Mike, please go ahead. Hi, good morning. I was hoping that you could talk a little bit about what you guys are seeing in China. We've heard some conflicting comments on kind of what trends have looked like since the end of Lunar New Year. Just curious if you can talk about what you're seeing and kind of what your expectations are over the next few months or few quarters. Absolutely, Mike. In China, we're seeing mid to high single-digit growth. In fact, both businesses, HHC and EA, performed very well there in Q1. HHC, as you'll recall, repositioned their portfolio, really focusing around higher growth, higher margin opportunities and applications where we had a lot of value in China. That's been successful. In the EA business, that team is just doing a fantastic job taking share in electronics and in EVs. In fact, if you strip out the impact of solar on the EA business in China in the quarter, it was up high teens. The business is performing very well there. As for the overall environment, it is an interesting one. We don't participate there in the construction space, and I'm pretty glad about that right now. Consumer electronics for us was flat, flat to just slightly up. I do think in some of the smaller electronics, there is really weak consumer demand there. I don't know if you've heard about the cell phone upgrades that normally would have been announced by now by Chinese producers getting delayed a bit. We're clearly seeing that. The team's doing a good job repositioning EA as well in Asia and in China in particular, away from solar, more so into these applications where we've already been having success and now redefining how they're looking at our general industries segment, seeing wins in MRO, in appliances, in electrical motor applications there. Our experience in China is good and continues to be good, and I think will remain so. All right. That's great to hear. I wanted to ask you about in the news, we've seen that there's been a recent recall on Tesla Cybertrucks because of issues with the adhesive bonding. I wanted to ask, is that a Fuller adhesive? If so, I'm sure this would not be the first time you've had maybe an issue with performance. How do you manage through a recall or kind of warranty issue like that? If not, is this an opportunity for you guys to step in and maybe pick up some business repairing those recalled vehicles and maybe using your adhesives in the future rather than something that wasn't working? Mike, that was absolutely not an H.B. Fuller product. In fact, it even emphasizes the opportunity that we have. Our team has continued to grow that automotive business. Despite seeing some market declines, they've continued to take share, and they're taking share through innovation. If you look at the business today, we're the world leader in interior trim applications in automotive. I've talked previously about us expanding the business into exterior trim applications. This is a great example of an exterior trim application where customers need to work with a partner like H.B. Fuller that has highly technical, successful products to bring as a solution. Yes, I think there's a lot of opportunity for us in that market. I've talked also previously, Mike, about as we look at our top 20 opportunities to grow this business, the highest margin, fastest growing spaces, one of those is structural adhesives. This is a good example of an application where structural adhesive from H.B. Fuller would be successful. I've seen some of the videos of that. I didn't think it was your product, but I wanted to check. Thank you for the detail there. Thank you for asking. Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Zekauskas with JP Morgan. Jeff, please go ahead. Thanks very much. Your solar business has been weak for a while. Do we have maybe another quarter to go before we lap comparisons and that the business begins to stabilize in China? Jeff, that business will, on a top line, continue to be weak throughout the rest of the year. The reason for that is we are repositioning that business away from certain applications, certain suppliers, some of the cheaper panels that do not have high efficiency. We are migrating the business into the more demanding innovation-driven applications, particularly in the panels of the future with higher efficiency. While you are going to continue to see this revenue drag on that business throughout the rest of the year, the margins on that business will appreciate significantly. Maybe another way to ask it is, what was the EBITDA penalty from that in the quarter, or what do you expect the EBITDA penalty to be for the year in solar? Yeah. I would say that this is a business, Jeff, that is probably down. It's a $100 million business. In In terms of revenue last year, it'll probably be down about 20% year on year. Pretty decent margins in the 35% kind of flow-through margin. So $20 million and a 35% flow-through is kind of the negative drag we have related to solar from an EBITDA standpoint. In terms of raw materials, what's going up? Is it more a raw material or a set of raw materials that's peculiar to HHC in that I don't really see much margin deterioration in the other businesses? Yeah. Raw materials are about 20% of the portfolio is increasing. If I look at it from a material count, we monitor 4,000 different raw materials because we've got so many different raws going into the business. There is a segment of those that are inflationary. A lot of those were in HHC, and those continue to increase. Again, we're reacting by driving price and also reallocating raw materials to different suppliers around the globe. Jeff, just to comment on the raw material movement, it's pretty flat sequentially from Q4 to Q1. I know we made a lot of comments in our prepared remarks around the negative impact of raw materials on EBITDA versus last year. That's primarily a carryover impact for the increases we saw last year. They're pretty flat sequentially from Q4 to Q1. That's why we know that to the extent raw materials stay flat for the rest of this year or we drive savings, we'll start to see year-on-year favorable comparisons in raw materials as we annualize against last year's increases. Lastly, or maybe there are two left. Your pre-tax charges in the quarter were about $23 million, but about $10 million of the $23 million were acquisition product costs. I guess those will go away. Maybe your non-recurring charges for the remainder of the year are another $30 million. You did $22 million or $23 million or so. Maybe your non-recurring items are $55 million pre-tax for the year. Is that a reasonable estimate? Yeah, that's a reasonable estimate. Maybe even a little bit lower than that, Jeff. You're right. The biggest impact in the quarter was acquisition costs. Of that $10 million, over $6 million was related to the flooring divestiture. That obviously isn't repeating. We will have a little bit of activity related to acquisition activity that's ongoing. That number should get smaller. I think I'm thinking this number is probably in the $40 million-$50 million pre-tax range. Okay. Lastly, can you talk about whether it feels like the European and U.S. economies are accelerating or decelerating or staying the same? I know you commented already about Asia. Yeah. If you look at our 30 segments, in Q1, we saw half of those accelerating. Those are global market segments, so about 16. If you looked at those 30 market segments in Q4, only 8 were accelerating. Really, twice as many of our market segments are showing acceleration versus prior quarter. If I look just at the European and the U.S. businesses, I really feel like the U.S. business, the North American business is slowing. Our U.S. business was really buoyed by our BAS segment this quarter. We can talk about some of the wins there, but I think suffice it to say our HHC business, our EA business, where we have more of that durable good exposure, both of them were weak in the U.S. I think the U.S. consumer is weak. In Europe, we saw a different story. In Europe, the construction market was not very good. Our BAS business was slower. Our EA business, which is exposed to automotive there and other durable goods, also was weak. The HHC business was in really good shape in Europe, which tells you a little more maybe about the European consumer. However, there is a big component of that, which is share wins. I do not want to draw too many conclusions about the consumer feeling really good in Europe because a lot of the benefit that we saw was both from innovation and share wins. We did have an easier comp in Q1 for HHC in the Middle East or in Egypt in particular and in Turkey. You might recall, Jeff, last year, first quarter, we had some currency constraints that kept us from selling in that market. Is that enough color? Yep. That's enough color. Thank you so much, Celeste. Sure. Absolutely. Again, if you would like to ask a question, simply press star, followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of Patrick Cunningham with Citig roup. Patrick, please go ahead. Hey, good morning. This is Rachael Lee on for Patrick. Hey, Rachael. Maybe a follow-up. Hey. Maybe a follow-up on the Europe environment. Can you point to the areas of share wins in HHC and how have volumes been performing this quarter? Can you say that again? How has what been performing this quarter? How have Europe volumes been performing this quarter? Yeah. We've experienced share wins across the board in HHC. In fact, almost every single segment grew in Europe this quarter. I mentioned some of those hygiene wins. We've taken share with about five major global hygiene customers. Much of that was in Europe. Of course, in beverage labeling, we have a great new product that has been taking share, essentially a beverage label with a biocide incorporated into the adhesive that prevents mold growth on labels. Our tape and label business has been doing a super job there. Our end-of-line packaging business is growing or grew this quarter in Europe. Really strong share take across the board. Also, not HHC related, but as it relates to aerospace in Europe, the team has done a nice job continuing to grow the business in that commercial MRO space and is well positioned in aerospace to benefit from defense spending in Europe and in North America. Got it. That is very helpful, Celeste. In BAS, it seems to be strong. Given some of the headlines and tariff pressures, market growth in 2025 does not seem to be a given. Do you see any volume risk across specific end markets? I am so glad you asked about BAS, Rachael. I was hoping someone would. The BAS team has really come together nicely. There is a lot of benefit in having these various construction-related segments working together. If you look at the construction market, particularly in the U.S. for us, I think we are in a very good position. I say that because we are in the right spaces and we are innovating. As far as being in the right spaces, the places where construction growth is still occurring in the U.S. is in healthcare, it is in education, it is in data centers. What are those? Those are big, flat, adhered roofing systems, which is perfect. That is really where our product creates a lot of value. In fact, I think there may be some benefit for us from these tariffs as mechanically fastened roofing systems may be tariffed because of the steel component. Back to data centers. We continue to grow there. That's a business. That's a space that's growing over 40% a year and is expected to do so in 2025 and over 30% in 2026. That's the overall market. We've introduced some new adhesives, speaking to innovation in that space. In fact, within probably momentarily, you'll be seeing the introduction of our PG-1 EF ECO 2 product, the Millennium product, which is actually a spray adhesive. It enables customers that are labor constrained to spray adhesive. While those have been around for a little while, our new introduction is actually non-fluorinated, no VOC, so low global warming impact. Now, I talked a little bit about how these BAS businesses are working together. We now have the glass, wood, and composites business as part of BAS. One of the most exciting innovations that I saw this quarter from our wood business, wood and composites business, was the introduction of a product for data center elevated floors that dissipates static electricity. It is a really important need in these data centers. We introduced a very novel, unique product that enables that to happen. I think we are going to see a lot more synergies that come from these market segments working together in these spaces like data centers over the coming years. I feel like our BAS business is very well positioned in the U.S. because we are in the right spaces and we are delivering innovation in these very complex, non-traditional construction markets that puts us ahead. Great. Thank you so much for the color. Your next question comes from the line of Rosemarie Morbelli with Gabelli Funds. Rosemarie, please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Morning, Rosemarie. Celeste, I was wondering if you could touch if we could go back to the tariffs for a second. I understand that the direct impact is most likely going to be minimal. When you look at your customers, some of which are going to be affected, can you put a percentage number on those customers' revenues, contribution to your operations that could be affected by the tariffs and therefore affect you indirectly? Yeah. I think it's going to be it's a hard question to answer, Rosemarie. I think the simplest answer is that durable goods production will be more so impacted by tariffs, like the automotive business, than other businesses. The consumer overall in the United States is likely to be impacted. I'm not sure how big the indirect impact will be. What I do know is that H.B. Fuller is a great stock to own in a recession. Our suppliers are more volume-sensitive than we are. That gives us a lot of opportunity to drive down raw material costs in a low-volume environment. I think if that happens, what you're going to see is a situation similar to what we delivered in 2023, which was a year where volume was really constrained, if you remember that, because of the destocking phenomena. We were able to grow even 10% even in that environment. I think that's how we think about this year. We're not counting on volume at all. In fact, we don't have any baked into our guidance. However, if that happens, we'll be able to continue to deliver the $55 million in price and raw material benefit action that we have already guided to and planned. That is very helpful. If I may ask another question, there are, my understanding is that there are PFAS in sealants and some adhesives. Do you have products that actually could replace those? Unless you have them in your own, but I do not think so. How large could that particular market be for you? Yeah, that is an exciting market for us, particularly as the innovator in the space. Yes, we have already in the past introduced some products and taken some share, particularly in the electronics market, Rosemarie, because we had PFAS-free alternatives to other PFAS-containing products. We are working closely with customers on this topic. As far as how large that market could be, it is very hard to say, hard to state. I do think the overall industrial production will continue to migrate away from PFAS-containing materials and we will be at the front end of that. Thank you. Since there are no questions, there's no further question at this time. I will now turn the conference back over to Celeste Mastin for closing remarks. Celeste? Thank you. Thank you to all of you for joining us this morning. We look forward to speaking with you again next quarter. That concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.