Day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Gemini second quarter 2026 earnings call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to Ryan Todd, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thanks, operator. Good morning, and thank you for joining Gemini second quarter 2026 earnings call. My name is Ryan Todd, Head of Investor Relations at Gemini. Joining me on the call today are Gemini's Co-Founders, Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, and our interim CFO, Danijela Stojanovic. Yesterday, we released our second quarter 2026 financial results. During today's call, we may make forward-looking statements which may vary materially from actual results and are based on management's current expectations, forecasts, and assumptions. Information concerning the risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could cause these results to differ is included in our SEC filings. Our discussion today will also include certain non-GAAP financial measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures are provided in the earnings presentation on our investor relations website and on the SEC's website. Non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, not as a substitute for, GAAP measures. We will start today's call with prepared remarks and then take questions. With that out of the way, let me turn the call over to our founders, Cameron and Tyler. Thanks, Ryan. Good morning, everyone. With the close of Q2, we are approaching the one-year anniversary of Gemini going public. In September 2025, the price of Bitcoin touched $117,000, and the market we were entering looked much different from the market we operate in today, with Bitcoin closing Q2 below $60,000. Despite these headwinds, we have been head down building for the Gemini of tomorrow. The Gemini platform has changed more in the past nine months than it did in the past decade. Last quarter, we spoke about the launch of prediction markets in December 2025, and last month, following the close of Q2, we launched commission-free U.S. stock trading. With the addition of stocks, customers in eligible states in the United States can now trade 1,000s of U.S. equities with 0% commission, participate in prediction markets, and trade crypto all from the Gemini app. Since the end of Q2, we also began operating our derivatives clearing house and settling our own prediction markets contracts following the DCO license we received from the CFTC in April. This quarter, we continued to focus on rapidly evolving our predictions business. While Q1 was largely product and feature-focused, this quarter, we invested in marketplace liquidity and improving the overall trader experience on our prediction marketplace. Since Q1, we tripled the number of contracted market makers on the platform, launched three new maker and taker incentive programs, and expanded trading infrastructure with several improvements to our predictions API. On the product side, we shipped personalized insights powered by AI and a rebuilt interface with unique category-specific experiences across the contract markets we offer. Looking ahead, we continue to see predictions as the largest near-term growth opportunity on the platform, especially heading into the upcoming sports season in the second half of the year. We've recently certified a wide range of new product filings and continue to deliver new experiences to directly capture that activity. With our clearing house now live and clearing our own contracts, which keeps those economics in-house, we are now focused on adding distribution partners to our DCM and expect to have more updates on our progress here shortly. Through all of it, the focus stays on continuing to improve the health of both sides of the order book. Deeper taker flow attracts more makers, which tightens spreads and lets customers trade with greater capital more predictably. We believe that this is the next unlock in driving prediction activity higher at Gemini. With that, I'll turn it over to Tyler to discuss our recent business highlights. Thanks, Cameron. Tyler here. In Q1, we laid out our strategy for Gemini 2.0, and Q2 was our first full quarter operating under it. As we march ahead in the second half of 2026, the shape of the business is visibly different. More products, a leaner cost base, less dollars going out the door, and revenue that leans less on spot crypto trading every quarter. Danijela will take you through the financials in detail shortly. I'm going to spend my time on what we built this quarter and what we intend to do with it. We've operated through crypto market cycles for over a decade, and the rule has held every time. Bear markets are for building. The first half of 2026 was a focus on building by design. We put our dollars and our focus into shipping new products and securing regulated infrastructure rather than overspend on acquisition in an environment where we felt paid acquisition wasn't going to earn the right returns. We continue to believe That was the right sequencing. It put us on pace to complete and operationalize our regulated derivatives stack. Our designated contract marketplace at the start of this year, our derivatives clearinghouse launched earlier this month, and our FCM application filed in June. Very few firms in this country hold that combination of licenses, and we built ours in-house rather than spending significant capital to acquire it. The stack was built for more than predictions. Most price discovery in crypto happens in perpetual futures, not spot. Today, the vast majority of that volume sits outside the United States. We already offer perpetual contracts to customers in Singapore, so the product and the technology are built and running. We own the DCM and the DCO and have filed our FCM application. If and when we receive the approvals we need, we are ready and intend to launch perpetual futures for U.S. customers. On the product side, this year, we have dramatically expanded what customers can actually trade at Gemini. With commission-free U.S. equities and ETFs launched in July, the platform now offers more than 5,000 tradable markets across equities, crypto, and event contracts, up from less than 100 a year ago. We also rebuilt our advanced trading experience on mobile, so customers can trade directly from the chart or the order book with positions, open orders, and margin all visible in one place. We expanded the assets available for margin trading, and we continue to improve our developer platform and API trading capabilities for programmatic and agentic traders. Taken together, the first half of this year was about building the products and licensing the structure needed to support a financial super app. We feel confident we've never had a better mousetrap, and it's driving better engagement, with multi-product users nearly doubling year-over-year. The focus now shifts to distribution and growing revenue by getting more customers and more activity on the platform while holding the cost discipline we established this year. With that, I'll turn over the call to our interim CFO, Danijela, to discuss our financial results for the quarter in greater detail. Thank you, Cameron and Tyler. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. I will start with a few key takeaways from the quarter, then walk you through the results in further detail and close with our updated financial outlook for the year. Three things I want to highlight upfront. First, total revenue grew 37% year-over-year to $45.5 million, driven by continued growth in services revenue and our OTC business. This growth came despite a 38% year-over-year decline in exchange revenue as crypto market volumes remained under pressure throughout the quarter. Second, services revenue and interest income reached $26 million, up 117% year-over-year and now representing 59% of net revenue, up from 50% in Q1, reflecting both the continued growth of the card and staking businesses and a softer trading environment. Third, our cost restructuring is delivering. Total operating expenses declined 15% sequentially to $122.4 million and headcount ended the quarter at approximately 402, down 40% from our Q3 2025 peak. The full benefit of the Q1 restructuring is now flowing through the cost structure. Turning to revenue, net revenue was $43.7 million, up 33% year-over-year. Transaction revenue was $17.8 million, down 15% year-over-year and down 26% sequentially. Within that, there were meaningful moving parts. Exchange revenue was $12.5 million, down 38% year-over-year and down 27% sequentially, reflecting continued softness in crypto trading activity. Total spot trading volume declined to $3.8 billion from $11.3 billion in Q2 of 2025, a 66% decline against a 38% decline in exchange trading revenue. Institutional volume accounted for nearly 90% of the volume decline, while fee economics continued to improve in both retail and institutional trading segments. OTC revenue was $4.7 million, up 671% year-over-year. Similar to Q1, the quarter included episodic client demand in response to periods of heightened volatility in the crypto market that contributed to elevated volume. The underlying eOTC API program continues to add institutional clients, and we expect OTC to remain variable quarter to quarter given the nature of large institutional trades. Prediction markets contributed $0.5 million to transaction revenue, up 18% sequentially. That figure is reported net of rebates. As Cameron mentioned, we launched new maker and taker incentive programs during the quarter, and the rebates paid under those programs, roughly 20% of gross fees, are reported as contra revenue. Event contracts traded in Q2 were up 93% quarter-over-quarter, and our focus in the period was on building depth in the order book rather than maximizing short-term fee capture. While this is still an early-stage product, we are encouraged by the growth in customer activity and believe the investments we are making today position the marketplace for stronger monetization as liquidity and participation continues to scale. Turning to services revenue and interest income, which was $26 million, up 117% year-over-year and up 6% sequentially. Let me walk you through the key components. Credit card revenue was $16.2 million, up 231% year-over-year and up 10% sequentially. Card MTUs were 106,000 at quarter end, up 165% year-over-year, though down 7% sequentially as we continue to shift our acquisition strategy towards higher returning, lower spend channels. New sign-ups in Q2 were approximately 5,000, reflecting that deliberate pullback in acquisition marketing in the second quarter. Card receivables remained roughly flat sequentially at $219.6 million, and pre-provision net revenue on the card improved 44% sequentially to $5.5 million, reflecting the continued maturation of the portfolio. Staking revenue was $4 million, up 88% sequentially and up 50% year-over-year. There were three primary drivers of the increase. First, approximately $1.6 million relates to revenue that economically belonged in the first quarter but was recognized in Q2 as we completed the migration to our in-house validator infrastructure and resolved associated data capture issues. Second, following that migration, we now act as a principal in the staking arrangement. So validator costs now flow through operating expenses rather than being netted against revenue, increasing reported staking revenue on a growth basis. Third, we also saw continued growth in staking adoption during the quarter, reflecting healthy underlying customer engagement with the product. Advisory fee revenue was $2.7 million, consistent with the prior two quarters, reflecting our ongoing advisory services agreement with a strategic customer entered into during Q3 2025. As the compensatory warrant arrangement associated with that agreement reaches the end of its recognition period in July 2026, we expect to recognize the small remaining amount of advisory fee revenue in the third quarter, after which this revenue source is expected to conclude. Custodial fee revenue was $0.6 million, down 67% both year-over-year and sequentially, reflecting lower average asset valuations on the platform during the quarter and net custody asset outflows. Assets on platform ended Q2 at $8.4 billion, compared to $18.2 billion in Q2 of 2025, reflecting the decline in crypto asset prices over the past year and the custody net asset outflows. Interest income was $2.4 million, roughly flat sequentially. Now turning to expenses. Total operating expenses were $122.4 million, down 15% sequentially from $144.5 million in Q1 and up 24% year-over-year. The sequential improvement reflects the full quarter benefit of our restructuring actions. Salaries and compensation were $48.2 million, down 26% sequentially. This includes $20.3 million of stock-based compensation. Without the $20.3 million of stock-based compensation, cash compensation was $27.9 million, down 32% sequentially and down 20% year-over-year, reflecting our lower headcount base following our workforce reduction. There was no severance in Q2 compared to $6.5 million in Q1. Headcount ended the quarter at approximately 402, down from 442 in Q1 and down approximately 40% from our Q3 2025 peak. Sales and marketing was $8.8 million, down 54% sequentially and down 45% year-over-year. Within that, brand and performance marketing was approximately $0.1 million, as we paused broad-based acquisition spend and focused on organic and targeted channels. That level of spend reflects our tactical decisions during the quarter and should not be viewed as a fixed operating run rate, as future investment will continue to be driven by market opportunities and expected returns. Credit card rewards and promotional and referral incentives were $8.7 million, down 24% sequentially, reflecting lower cardholder spend activity during the quarter. Transaction losses increased from $3.6 million in the prior year to $20.1 million. The increase is primarily due to higher provision for expected credit losses on the credit card portfolio. As we discussed last quarter, we previously identified an identity fraud event in Q1 and established an initial $4.1 million reserve based on the information available at the time. During the second quarter, as our investigation progressed, we identified additional fraud patterns and affected accounts associated with the same Q1 origination cohort. These account balances continue to mature through the delinquency cycle, and our June 30th reserve reflects our updated estimate under the CECL methodology. Importantly, based on our analysis, we believe the elevated provision is concentrated to this identified fraud-related cohort and does not reflect broad-based deterioration in the underlying credit portfolio. We have taken actions to strengthen our fraud controls and monitoring, and while provision expense will continue to evolve as the portfolio seasons, we expect future provisioning to be driven primarily by the underlying credit performance of the portfolio rather than one-time fraud events. Technology expenses were $18.8 million, down 15% sequentially and up 5% year-over-year, reflecting operating efficiencies that largely offset continued investment in product development. General and administrative expenses were $20.6 million, down 5% sequentially and up 7% year-over-year. Combined, tech and G&A was $39.3 million for the quarter, tracking within our full year guidance range. On the bottom line, net loss was $107.7 million, an improvement of 19% year-over-year compared to a net loss of $133.2 million in Q2 2025. Adjusted EBITDA was a loss of $74 million compared to a loss of $59.9 million in Q1 and a loss of $51.9 million in Q2 of 2025. That deterioration is driven primarily by non-cash mark-to-market losses on Bitcoin holdings, reflecting the decline in Bitcoin prices during the quarter following the close of the $100 million strategic investment of Bitcoin that we received in May. We believe that operating loss offers a cleaner view of our operational performance, which improved 18% sequentially from $94.2 million in Q1 to $76.9 million in Q2, reflecting the full quarter benefit of our restructuring actions and continued expense discipline across the business. Monthly transacting users were 580,000, up 11% year-over-year, though down 2% sequentially as softer crypto market conditions weighed on trading activity. Let me close with our outlook. Consistent with prior quarters, we are not providing formal revenue guidance at this time. While we have expanded our product portfolio and market infrastructure, many of these initiatives are still in the early stages of monetization. Our focus in the first half of this year was on building capacity by expanding our regulated footprint, launching new products, and improving the marketplace. As we shift our focus toward distribution and customer acquisition in the second half of 2026, we expect these investments to contribute more meaningfully over time. But the pace of that ramp remains difficult to predict, given both the early stage of these businesses and the broader macro and crypto environment. On expenses, we are refining the precision of our outlook. Cash compensation is still expected to decline 15%-20% relative to 2025 levels, which does not account for stock-based compensation or restructuring charges. Stock-based compensation is still expected to total $100 million-$115 million for the full year. We now expect technology and G&A expenses to be between $155 million and $170 million for the full year, narrowing our previous guidance range. On marketing, our guidance remains unchanged at 10%-15% of revenue without rewards and promotions. Marketing spend in the second quarter was intentionally well below that range as we prioritized investments in product development, regulated infrastructure, and marketplace capabilities during a period of weaker customer acquisition economics. As we enter the second half of the year, we expect to increase brand and performance marketing while remaining within the full year guidance range we previously provided. With nearly two quarters of restructuring now behind us and the full cost run rate reflected in our results, we have largely completed the first phase of Gemini's transformation. Over the past year, we believe that we have fundamentally reshaped the business by broadening our product offerings and establishing a more disciplined operating model. We are adding products. Stocks are live, predictions are scaling, and the derivatives infrastructure is in place. We believe that we are operating more efficiently than at any point since going public. The next phase is execution and growing adoption across our expanding platform while maintaining the discipline that we have established. To summarize, this quarter reflects continued progress as we continue to transform Gemini into a broader multi-product financial platform. We delivered 37% year-over-year revenue growth despite one of the weakest crypto trading environments since becoming public, improved operating loss for the third consecutive quarter, and continued to expand beyond our historical exchange business. While there is still meaningful work ahead to improve profitability, we believe we have largely completed the heavy lifting of expanding our product and market infrastructure. Our focus now shifts to scaling adoption, growing revenue, and demonstrating the operating leverage embedded in the platform. With that, I will hand it back to Ryan to open up the Q&A. Thanks, Danijela. We will now turn to Q&A. Questions were submitted in writing yesterday after the release of our second quarter results. Before we go analyst by analyst, we want to first start with a repeat question we received from several analysts, specifically on the provision for credit losses in the quarter. Given how consistently it came up, we will address that to start. On the provision for credit losses in the quarter, understanding that the majority of these provisions are from a fraud incident, how are provisions for credit losses looking outside of this incident within the portfolio? With respect to fraud, can you help us understand what changed in your assessment from May to today? How confident are you that we should not see another meaningful provision from this cohort? Thanks, Ryan. We understand the question given the size of the Q2 provision. First, I would separate the operational issue from the underlying credit performance of the portfolio. Based on our investigation to date, we believe that this was a concentrated identity fraud event associated with a specific Q1 origination cohort, rather than broad-based deterioration in the portfolio. Many of those accounts were still current at the end of the first quarter, and then naturally progressed through the delinquency cycles during the second quarter. As our investigation progressed during that time period, we identified additional fraud patterns and affected accounts associated with that same fraud event. As those amounts really matured and more performance data became available, we updated our CECL estimate to reflect the expanded scope of this identified fraud event. And what I will say is that the headline delinquency metrics this quarter are overwhelmingly influenced by that one concentrated cohort, rather than a change in the broader credit characteristics of the portfolio. If you exclude the fraud-related cohort, you can see that the underlying portfolio has performed broadly in line with our expectations. Delinquency increased from 3.8%- 9.4%, but nearly all of that increase was fraud related. So fraud related delinquency rose from 1%- 6.1%. While when you look at the non-fraud delinquency, it increased modestly from 2.8% - 3.3%. This is consistent with normal seasoning in a relatively young portfolio. And what we've done since, we've taken these learnings and strengthened our fraud controls, onboarding, and monitoring based on what we've learned through our investigation. From a timing perspective, these provision balances will flow through to charge-off state over the normal credit loss cycle as they progress through delinquency and reach charge-off status. Lastly, we will say, obviously, it's hard with respect to the second half of the year, we're not providing quarterly guidance on provision expense or charge-offs. But as with any lending portfolio, provision expense will continue to naturally evolve as the portfolio seasons and as new information becomes available. But what we will say is that based on what we know today, we expect the future provisioning to increasingly reflect the underlying credit performance of the portfolio rather than this specific fraud event. As a repeated follow-up, what specifically changed in the fraud screening that's going to protect you from this occurring in the future? Yeah. Unfortunately, fraud prevention isn't a static process. Fraud is an area where bad actors continue to evolve their tactics. Our fraud controls and monitoring and underwriting capabilities have to continue to evolve alongside them. We've implemented a number of enhancements and controls based on what we learned from this event, and we will continue to invest in those capabilities over time. We also periodically implement new enhancements and controls irrespective of any given event so that we can continue to be equipped to identify and prevent evolving fraud schemes. Beyond that, we don't think it's appropriate to discuss the details of our fraud controls publicly because those controls are part of our fraud prevention framework. But we view it as an ongoing discipline rather than a one-time fix. Our next question comes from James Yaro at Goldman Sachs. On prediction markets, can you walk us through your competitive advantages in prediction markets, specifically in having them built in-house? How do you scale in this market, given competitors are investing aggressively and bringing much larger customer bases? This is Cameron here. I think one of the key points here is that we are not just a predictions app. We are actually building a super app that offers predictions, and those predictions are offered alongside spot Bitcoin, staking, a credit card, and U.S. equities, and more. We think there's a lot of opportunity for cross-pollinization, and it's a broader offering than simply just predictions. I think few people actually have such a strong breadth. In addition, focusing on predictions, we've also invested in the entire stack. We've got the clearing house and the exchange, which allows us to control our destiny with more control and also work on distribution partnerships to help move the flywheel. I think taken together, it's a much different story than simply just predictions, and I think the opportunity to cross-sell the existing customer base that we have is a great opportunity. For example, 50% of the people who have placed predictions on Gemini also have a Gemini credit card. That's one good example of the cross-pollinization among our super app. Our next question comes from Michael Cyprys at Morgan Stanley. On perpetuals, given the CFTC's approval of digital asset perps in the U.S., what's the process and timeframe for Gemini to bring a product to market? What are some gating items that need to be overcome? More broadly, if the U.S. regulatory path opens for perps beyond crypto, how quickly could you launch, and where do you think client interest might be strongest? Finally, given the liquidity advantages of larger incumbents, what gives you confidence you can build meaningful share? Thanks for the question. This is Tyler. We are in the process of achieving the approvals we need to offer perpetuals on crypto in the U.S., and what's required is an amendment to our DCO, which is already in flight for margining, and the approval of an FCM, which is already in flight. Once we receive those approvals, we'll be able to launch perpetuals in the U.S. It's important to note that the technology on our side is ready. We already offer this product offshore in Singapore, so we've been doing this now for at least two years, maybe more. We understand the technology, the risk engine, the matching engine, and how to run this type of marketplace. Now it's just a matter of getting the necessary approvals in the U.S., which we believe could happen this year. Once that does happen, we will offer these products. These products have been the largest traded products with the most liquidity in crypto for a really long time. We're very optimistic about the demand. The crypto industry likes to trade perps. There's a huge demand for it, and there has been there globally for many years. Once we get the green light in the U.S., we're excited to bring this instrument to U.S. customers. This is Cameron. Just to build on that a little bit. Perps have been the most popular instrument in crypto for many years, but there's been no perps in the U.S., so that story, it's just getting started. It's so early. When you think of competition and the opportunity, I think the starting gun has essentially just gone off. We're at mile one of a marathon. The perp story in the U.S. is just getting started, and there's just, we think, a tremendous amount of demand and excitement for these products, and it is very early days, even though they've existed offshore elsewhere for a long time. Our next question comes from Adam Frisch at Evercore. Card MTUs fell in 2Q 2026. Do you expect sustained MTU growth to remain soft negative given the bearish crypto market? Do you expect the growth in prediction markets and the newly introduced equities product to be able to reverse the card MTU growth trend? Thanks for the question. This is Cameron. I think the story of the card in 2025 was very much a growth story, and a lot of that was the excitement of this innovative ability to earn crypto rewards with a credit card. Naturally, as crypto prices have declined 50% since their peak last year, thereabouts, interest in a crypto rewards card naturally wanes a bit, and it can be cyclical. With that said, I think we spent the last two quarters, if 2025 was very much about growth, I think the first half of 2026 is about maturity and making sure that we're putting in the right controls. We've got a big growth in receivables and ensuring that we catch fraud, we've got the right controls in place, and that the portfolio is seasoning for the long term. We think that the card is still very much like a diesel engine. I mean, people love it, and I think there's a lot of growth just organically through word of mouth, even in the crypto downturn. We very much believe in this product, and we believe that it will continue to grow throughout 2026. Our focus has shifted in light of how the market has changed. This is Tyler. I'll also add that we're looking to expand the type of rewards that customers can earn with the credit card, such as offering the ability to earn stock rewards. This plays into our overall vision, of course, of the super app, where the credit card's one piece of that larger puzzle and experience. We're not just a crypto company. We offer, obviously, equities now and predictions. As customer demand changes, whether it is they are into Bitcoin or that changes into AI stocks, we have that offering for them. It is always harder to market crypto when the prices are down, even though customers, this is the time they should be purchasing Bitcoin. They tend to get excited about purchasing Bitcoin when prices near all-time highs. This further emphasizes the importance of having a really broad offering. The credit card earning rewards is part of that, but also being really broad in our offering on what rewards mean, and whether that is you can earn back crypto or you can earn back in stocks. Obviously, AI stocks are really popular and there is a lot of demand. We do not want to lose that customer. That just goes back to this idea that we are, of course, we started as a crypto company, but we really evolved into Gemini 2.0, into a markets company. We continue to work on increasing the dimensions of that. Our next question comes from Matt Coad from Truist. Could you touch on the long-term ARPU expansion opportunity for Gemini power users? Put another way, how does the ARPU for your retail customer that adopts all of your Gemini 2.0 product offerings compare to the blended average retail ARPU today, and how do you plan on creating more power users? Thanks for the question, Matt. We believe there is a meaningful long-term ARPU expansion opportunity ahead of us, especially as customers adopt more of the Gemini ecosystem. Historically, many retail customers engage with us through really a single product for the most part. Our strategy is to increase both the scope and the frequency of engagement by offering a more comprehensive financial platform. The first half of 2026 was really about that, right? About building the ecosystem and giving customers more reasons to engage with Gemini through products like prediction markets and now more recently, commission-free equities, while at the same time ensuring the card business was on a solid footing after the fraud events. Going forward, the focus really shifts to distribution by driving adoption across that product suite, increasing cross-sell, and also creating more multi-product power users. That's really what we believe will drive the next leg of ARPU expansion and customer growth. A year ago, we were primarily acquiring crypto traders. Today, we're acquiring customers into a platform that includes a much broader product offering, and we believe that will meaningfully expand customer lifetime value and gives us greater opportunity to really monetize each acquired and existing customer over time. While we don't disclose product-level ARPU, we consistently see that multi-product customers, they do trade more frequently, they retain balances longer, and exhibit stronger long-term retention. So over time, we believe this product ecosystem will really drive sustainable ARPU expansion through that greater product adoption and higher engagement frequency, rather than, again, relying solely on higher trading activity or favorable crypto market conditions. Our last question comes from John Todaro from Needham. Following the initial launch of stock trading on the platform, how have early volumes looked? Additionally, how are trading activity trends across the platform since the beginning of the third quarter? Are there any specific categories that clients are trading more frequently this quarter within predictions? Thank you, John. We're encouraged by the early reception to equities, but it's still very early days. The launch is only about five weeks old, so we're going to be careful not to over-interpret the initial activity. We don't expect equities to be a material revenue contributor in 2026. Over the long term, the monetization opportunity really comes through deeper customer relationships, including customer cash balances and securities lending, as well as order flow economics rather than trading commissions. Again, more importantly, as we've emphasized numerous times, we view equities as another step in building our super app and a broader investing platform. Over the past year, as Cameron or Tyler highlighted, I believe we've expanded from fewer than 100 tradable products to roughly 5,000 across crypto equities and prediction markets. Our multi-product user base has nearly doubled year-over-year. These are the metrics that we're most focused on because it does drive engagement and cross-sell opportunities. With respect to Q3 activities, spot crypto volumes have moderated from the elevated levels we saw historically, and it's weaker than the second quarter as well, which is consistent with publicly available market data. At the same time, prediction markets have continued to perform well. We reached new monthly highs in prediction trading volume during July. Some of that was helped by the later stages of the World Cup. Importantly, activity has remained healthy even after that concluded. We continue to see strong engagement specifically in our crypto prediction contracts, especially Bitcoin contracts that have across different sort of durations and expiry dates, and really demonstrating that prediction markets are evolving beyond one-off event-driven trading. Thank you. This concludes today's conference. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.