Good morning and welcome to the GeoPark Limited conference call following the results announcement for the third quarter ended September 30th, 2025. After the speaker remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question at this time, press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star followed by two. If you do not have a copy of the press release, it is available at the Invest With Us section on the company's corporate website at www.GeoPark.com. A replay of today's call may be accessed through this webcast in the Invest With Us section of the GeoPark corporate website. Before we continue, please note that certain statements contained in the results press release and on this conference call are forward-looking statements rather than historical facts and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described. With respect to such forward-looking statements, the company seeks protections afforded by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These risks include a variety of factors, including competitive developments and risk factors listed from time to time in the company's SEC reports and public releases. Those lists are intended to identify certain principal factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements but are not intended to represent a complete list of the company's business. All financial figures included here were prepared in accordance with the IFRS and are stated in the U.S. dollar unless otherwise noted. Reserve figures correspond to PRMS standards. On the call today from GeoPark is Felipe Bayon, Chief Executive Officer, Jaime Caballero, Chief Financial Officer, Martin Terrado, Chief Operating Officer, Rodrigo Dalle Fiore, Chief Exploration and Development Officer, and Maria Catalina Escobar, Shareholder Value and Capital Markets Director. I will turn the call over to Mr. Felipe Bayon. Mr. Bayon, you may begin. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining GeoPark's third quarter 2025 results call. We are at a pivotal moment in GeoPark's journey towards strengthening our foundation and advancing our long-term growth strategy. On October 16th, we successfully closed the acquisition of two high-quality blocks in Vaca Muerta, Neuquén, securing full operational control of Loma Jarillosa Este and Puerto Silva Oeste. With this move, we have entered one of the world's most promising unconventional basins and opened a new chapter of long-term growth and diversification. In parallel, we launched our new strategic plan and capital allocation framework during our investor day on October 21st. The plan is built around two clear priorities: first, sustaining a resilient and high-margin base in Colombia; and second, rapidly scaling a transformational platform in Argentina. In our base case 2030, we are targeting consolidated production of 42,000 bbls-46,000 bbls of oil equivalent per day, an adjusted EBITDA of $520 million-$550 million, and a net leverage ratio of 0.8-1.0, all while maintaining capital discipline, financial strength, and our commitment to ESG. Beyond this firm plan, our vision for the business entails materializing further significant upsides in our existing high-quality asset base, along with accretive inorganic growth. To support this strategy, the Board of Directors approved a revised dividend program totaling approximately $6 million over the next four quarters, or the equivalent of $0.03 per share per quarter, starting with the third quarter of 2025 payout. As of the third quarter 2026, dividends will be suspended as investments in Argentina peak. Dividend levels will be reviewed as we progress through the investment cycle and return to positive free cash flow. This reflects our ongoing commitment to strong shareholder returns, investment in growth, and financial flexibility. Turning now to our 3Q 2025 results, on the operational front, we had a solid third quarter. We delivered average consolidated production of 28,136 bbls of oil equivalent per day, which is exceeding 2025 guidance and up nearly 3% quarter over quarter. This is driven by strong performance in our core operated and non-operated assets in Colombia. Llanos 34, which we operate, remained a key engine, with continued efficiency gains across drilling and workover operations and stable base management. In Llanos 123, we advanced drilling operations at Toritos Norte 3, and we made progress on infrastructure in Puerto Gaitán, preparing for the next campaign in Llanos 104. Our team continued to improve efficiency and cost management across the board. Operating cost averaged $12.5 per barrel, fully in line with our 2025 guidance. By the end of the third quarter, we had captured more than $15 million in efficiencies, equivalent to about $19.5 million in annual structured savings. A clear sign of a leaner and more agile operating model underway. On the financial front, adjusted EBITDA reached $71.4 million with a 57% margin, broadly stable versus the second quarter, supported by higher volumes and steady realized prices. Net income was $15.9 million compared to the net loss in the previous quarter. Excluding a non-recurrent exploration write-off in the Putumayo Basin, net profit would have been $23.4 million, consistent with our strong EBITDA performance. We invested $17.5 million during the quarter, mainly to sustain and enhance production in Llanos 34 and progress exploration across Colombia. We ended the quarter with $197 million in cash. From June to October, we repurchased $108 million of our 2030 notes below par, generating $9.5 million in annual cash savings and further optimizing our capital structure. With no principal maturities until 2027 and a net leverage ratio of 1.2x, we remain in a strong balance sheet position to manage our liabilities proactively. Our hedging program remains a key element of our financial resilience. As of early November, approximately 62% of the expected 2026 production is already protected through three-way collars with a first floor at $65 per barrel, a second floor at $50 per barrel, and an average ceiling at $73 per barrel. In summary, this was a quarter of disciplined execution and strategic performance. Looking ahead, we are on track to release our 2026 work program and investment guidance before year-end. This plan will provide further granularity on our renewed strategic direction, again focused on building and maximizing value delivery from a high-margin base in Colombia and our new operated assets in Vaca Muerta, Argentina. In particular, we are preparing to scale up operations in Loma Jarillosa Este and Puerto Silva Oeste blocks, where we've already begun implementing productivity enhancements. Our priorities remain clear. Operate safely and efficiently, maintain financial discipline, and maximize shareholder value. Before we take your questions, we also wanted to briefly discuss the proposal we received from Parex Resources. As we said in our press release on October 29th, our board is always open to opportunities that fairly reflect the company's value, strategy, and long-term potential. Following a robust process, our board unanimously determined that the unsolicited, non-binding proposal of $9 per share that was submitted by Parex on September 4, 2025, prior to our announcement of GeoPark's transformative Vaca Muerta acquisition, undervalues GeoPark, fails to reflect our growth prospects and our diversified portfolio, and is not in the best interest of our shareholders. Following Parex's public reiteration of its $9 per share offer, the board unanimously authorized me to further engage with Parex and provide additional information to help Parex improve its offer. In addition, GeoPark's board of directors has formed a special committee of independent directors, including Sylvia Escobar, Constantine Papadimitriou, Summit Varma, and Brian Maxtead, to evaluate any potential revised offer from Parex and other value-maximizing alternatives for the company. We are not going to make any further comments regarding Parex or the process unless and until we determine that further disclosure is appropriate. We would appreciate it if you keep your question focused on the quarter. With that, let's open the floor to your questions. Thank you. To ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad now. If you change your mind, please press star followed by two. When preparing to ask your question, please ensure your device is unmuted locally. Our first question comes from Joaquin Robet from Balanz Capital. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Hey. Can you hear me? Yes, Joaquin. Morning. How are you? Go ahead, please. Good morning. Thank you for your presentation. My question is regarding the 2026 Vaca Muerta work program. Could you provide more color on the upcoming studies and permits, their timing, and whether the associated CapEx and commitments are fully funded? Absolutely, Joaquin. I'll give you a bit of context, and then I'll ask Martin to take it into more detail. One thing I'd say is that having started as operator in Vaca Muerta, I mean, 21 days ago, to be exact, we've already started conducting interventions on the wells, and we're fully, I mean, engaged with the operations and the program going forward. Martin, if you can give us a bit more color, that would be great. Absolutely, Felipe. Good morning, Joaquin. Thanks for your question. I'll start by saying that our first priority on October 16th was to safely and seamlessly receive the operations, including 11 Pluspetrol employees that are now GeoPark employees. The production right now in both blocks is around 1,100 bbls of oil equivalent per day. What we have done the day that we basically took over the operations was immediately we started shutting in three wells from one pad. This operation has a total of six wells in production in Loma Jarillosa Este. We shut in three wells from one pad so that we could go and install artificial lift. Just to share with everybody, I mean, how we operate and how quick we are learning, we have done all three of the operations already. The first of the activities was done in 7.8 days. The last one we did in less than three days. Actually, when you add up all the days that we had in the program, we have done it in around 10% less than what was planned. In addition to that, as we go from the approximately. 1,500 bbls-2,000 bbls of operated, those six wells can be delivering, and we go to the 20,000 bbls we know that the OpEx is key. We looked at what are the things that we could do. We already reduced around $200,000 per month for trucking. That is where we are. Next, within the next 10 days, we will be putting on production those three wells. That will put us on a total production for Vaca Muerta in the order of 1,600 bbls-1,700 bbls of oil per day. As we commented in our investor day, we are going to a 20,000 bbls oil per day from both blocks with one rig that will be starting operations by the end of next year. With our original plan to have a central processing facility for 20,000 bbls of oil per day, also that we will be ready by early 2027. What are we doing in the meantime? The number one thing is, we're talking with the neighboring operators, and there's very open collaboration in a sense that many of them have spare capacity already installed. We're looking at options so that between now and whether or not we decide to go with the central processing facility, we can optimize and maximize our margins. In a sense of basically connecting to those operating neighbors and sending the production to them. We're also looking at opportunities that we have upgrading Loma Jarillosa. Like you were asking, Joaquin, on starting on permits, we already started those, and our plan is to submit them by the first quarter of 2026. I think you had the other question you had was around commitments. I'll say that on commitments, drilling commitments is only one for Puerto Silva Oeste, and it's due by 2028. One well order of magnitude, you can think about $15 million. Within Loma Jarillosa, there was a commitment to do the workovers in the block, and we've already done them. From the perspective of commitments, you can see that they're very low. Thanks, Martin. Great. I think on the funding side, Jaime, if you can give us a bit more color. Yes, of course, Felipe. Hi, Joaquin. On funding, the program that Martin has described, when you bring it down to numbers, we're talking about a CapEx range that is somewhere between $50 million-$70 million next year on the base case. Of course, if these options that Martin referred to associated to using third-party capacity go through, we would be looking at a lower number, most likely. There are opportunities to optimize that. In our base case, that $50 million-$70 million is fully funded. We already have existing credit lines in Argentina with local banks in Argentina that go up to $100 million. There is no stretch in this. Furthermore, we are also looking, and this more in the long term, beyond 2026. Our financing is characterized by a broad toolbox that you've heard me talk about this before. We are in discussions with other parties around the possibility of oil prepayments. There is a lot of interest in the market associated to that. We're also, in our base case, contemplating the possibility of debt issuance in Argentina. There is also a lot of appetite for that. All this to say that we don't have any concerns around the funding of this program. Thank you. Thanks, Jaime. And thanks, Joaquin. Thank you very much for your answers. Thank you. Our next question comes from Eduardo Muniz from Santander. His question is, in Colombia, could you comment on the lower CapEx for this quarter and give us an update regarding production and the stage of exploratory campaigning in Llanos Basin? Also, can you update on how the infill campaign is progressing relative to cost/performance targets and timeline? In CPO-5, could you provide more detail to us about the commercial agreement with BP that started in August? How did this impact oil discounts and transportation cost? Regarding reserves, we will see major changes given investments, VM acquisition, and positive results from exploratory wells. So how do you view your reserves and reserve life? What increment should we see in reserves? In Argentina, could you comment on the current phase you are at in terms of operations? How complex and the timing for getting regulatory permits to start building your own infrastructure? You closed a transaction in Vaca Muerta. Has the cash disbursement been done? What was the final? Thanks, Eduardo, and thanks for submitting your questions through the website. Thanks for that, and thanks for your interest in the company. Obviously, there are quite a few questions here. We'll try to address them through different, some of us that are here in the room today. I'll start with the first one and then hand it over to Martin and Rodrigo. I would say that the CapEx that you've seen and the CapEx deployment over the year reflects the plan that we had for the year. It's in line with the plan that we had and reflects the level of activity. I'll ask Martin to go into some more detail, and then, Rodrigo, if you can talk about some of the exploratory campaign in Llanos, and you guys can talk about the infill campaign as well. Then we'll take the other questions. Absolutely. Thank you, Eduardo, for your questions. I'll cover the more operational ones, and then we'll continue with Rodrigo. If we talk about CapEx, you're absolutely right. Our third quarter CapEx was around $17.5 million. That reflects the execution of our plan and agreed drilling program. Most of our capital is drilling. If you look at the previous two quarters, we were spending around $25 million-$27 million. That was with two rigs. In the third quarter, we had one rig. That's the main reason. Looking forward into the fourth quarter, we're going to be ramping up. We already have two rigs operating in Llanos 123 and a third rig coming for the exploration that Felipe mentioned in block 104. With that, you're going to see that the fourth quarter would be an increase from the third quarter. Another point mentioning there is that ramp-up, it's also an agreed decision with our partners based on the first half of the year results. We had very good results in Llanos 123 and a very successful infill drilling program in Llanos 34. Let me go to that one, to how we did in the infill drilling program in Llanos 34. That was a program that we planned for the first half of the year, six wells. Infill means that they are within the pads that are already drilled and were exceeding planned on production, delivering 2,600 bbls of oil per day, which is above what we had on the plan for those six wells. The cost of the wells has been exceptional. We're drilling the wells, and we drilled those wells at $2.9 million each one. As a comparison, those same wells last year, they were costing us 30% more. It is a 30% reduction. That is going back to what I mentioned before. By doing this, having good results, we are confident to bring back the rig and start drilling again infill wells in Llanos 34, which we are doing by the last part of December and into 2026. This is a clear example of how we are maximizing value through CapEx and in our core assets. I think the next question you had was more around production. I am probably going to reiterate most of the things that Felipe mentioned, but third quarter production was 28,136 bbls of oil equivalent per day. That is around a 3% increase. We had strong performance across all assets. We also had Manatee coming in. If we look at the core assets that we have, CPO-5, no blockages. Delivering above plan, Llanos 34 on plan. Even though we did have some assets on electrical reliability that are already fixed. Llanos 123, which is our block that has been growing continuously, we started the year at 3,700 bbls of oil per day. Right now, we're above 5,000 bbls of oil per day. We feel that strong around delivering within our range of production guidance, which is 26,000 bbls-28,000 bbls. We expect to be on the high range of that as we finish the year. I think with that, I'll turn it to you, Rodrigo. Thank you, Martin. Hi, Eduardo. This is Rodrigo. I'm going to share where we are in terms of exploration in Los Llanos. The activity was concentrated in two assets or two blocks. The first one is Llanos 123, and the other one is Llanos 104. Let's talk about the Llanos 123, where we concentrate most of the activity. It's good to remember that we started the discoveries here a couple of years ago with Toritos. What we are doing is near-field exploration. Actually, we are testing the north part of the block, the north part of Toritos extension in a different structure. The name of the well was Curubutu. We drilled that in the second quarter of this year, and we are producing 400 bbls per day in a very stable way from that well. That allowed us to drill a new well to delimitate the—I try to understand how big is the structure there with the new well. We are drilling that well actually right now. We expect some results by the end of this year for the northern part of Toritos area. After that, what we did is try to de-risk the eastern part. We went with a new well to the right side of the main fault that we see there. Torito Este 1 is the name of the well. We are starting the testing today. We are going to have some results maybe in a couple of weeks. We are very anxious. The logs look very promising. The last activity that we have for this year is Visvita South. What we are trying to do there, actually, we are drilling this well in this moment, is try to prove the extension of the Visvita area to the south. That is the main activity that we have in terms of exploration in 123. All of them have very interesting results. At the end of the day, it is the base for the growth of this field and the development plan that we have for the near future. In the Llanos 104, what we have done is Matraquero. We have just finished that well. It is under evaluation right now. We are discussing with our partner what is next for this prospect. We are planning to drill the second well in the block by the end of this year. Vencejo is the name of that prospect. We are going to have some results. Late this year or maybe early next year. That's the news that we have related with exploration coming from Los Llanos. It's a very interesting play for us. It's a growth driver. That's why we are continuing doing that in the next years and coming years. Thanks, Rodrigo. If I may, Jaime, can you tell us a bit about the commercial agreements with BP and CPO-5? Sure. Thanks, Eduardo, for the question. CPO-5 commercial agreement, it's been quite a landmark for us because I'm going to talk a little bit about the optionality that it creates, right? Let's put some facts on the table first. The scope of the deal with BP covers about 6,500 bbls a day of our production. It's mainly CPO-5, but there's also Llanos exploration crude involved in that deal that can fall within the scope. The duration of the deal that we signed with BP is 12 months, starting back in August. Let me take you a bit through the intent. What we really want to do is we want to maximize the value of CPO-5 crude in the context of changing domestic demand, right? CPO-5 crude, the bulk of it is actually quite special crude because it's light oil. There is an opportunity there to capture maximum value relative to other crudes in the Colombian marketplace and blends in the international marketplace. That was the problem that we wanted to solve. We engaged in this conversation with a number of players around how we could create export optionality through Coveñas. This is something that we had not done before at GeoPark. We opened up that door. Basically, the deal allows us this avenue to export directly at Coveñas, right? FOB. In doing so, it allows us to capture the best possible terms that you can get and basically create arbitrage between the domestic prices that you can get, which are a portrayal, if you will, of the reduced domestic marketplace that we have versus the broader international market. It also gives us blending optionality. In the contract with BP, we can also blend these crudes with other crudes and therefore improve the overall differentials that we get. Furthermore, the other characteristic of this contract is that it came in with financing optionality. We actually got a credit line associated to oil prepayments of $50 million. It's an option. We haven't pulled it, but it's something that we can use at any given time and at very competitive terms. If you think about the commitment fees and if you think about the interest associated to these lines, it's probably 200 basis points below marketplace. We're all very happy with this. When you do the numbers, two characteristics, what I would say is that the commercial discount in aggregate of these crudes is in the $4-$5 versus Brent range. It's a very competitive discount relative to our other crudes. It is well on the plan that we have had for this year. From an accounting standpoint, if you look at our balance sheet, you will see that the selling expenses have come up because now, in the past, we had an off-peak agreement where we did not incur on the selling expenses, but we were getting a lower price. Now, we incur on the selling expense associated to the transport to Coveñas when we do exports, but that is offset by a better price capture. That is the movement that you are seeing there. I hope this helps. Thanks. Jaime, thanks a lot. I'll take the reserves one, which was your third question, Eduardo. It's around, do we see major changes from the investments? The answer is no. It's on the margins. Vaca Muerta, definitely very, very positive in terms of the acquisition. As you recall, we've said that our 1P numbers would go from five to seven years, 2P to 10 years. What I'd say is that we're going through the certification process right now as we speak. That's part of ongoing work that the team is going with the certifiers. Directionally, I say we aim to be over 100% of reserves replacement for the year, which is very good news. It's very good news. I think it builds on what Martín was talking about in terms of operational excellence and conducting things like drilling and workovers and water shutoffs. Sort of lower cost and less time than we used to. A lot of efficiency going into the program. What Rodrigo was talking about, some of the, not only, exploration, but appraisal opportunities that we have. All of that will be brought into the conversation around reserves. As you can probably imagine, we cannot talk anymore or with more detail around an ongoing process. Again, we aim to be over 100% organically in terms of replacing our reserves. Your third question was around Argentina. I think Martín has already talked on where we are in terms of operations with a lot of detail. I will ask him to talk about some of the regulatory permits and infrastructure and optionality that we have around that. On the last part of your question, which is the transaction, yeah, the transaction's been closed. Cash has been disbursed. We've paid $115 million. That's the number that was announced to the market. That's the final number for the deal. Martín, if you want to talk about some of the permits and infrastructure. Yes, absolutely. The permits are basically around roads and the permits for the new paths, and finally, for the location of the CPF. As I mentioned before, we will be submitting those by the first quarter of 2026. We are looking at opportunities again on whether or not we will fully use those permits. There is an option and chances that we could leverage from collaborative infrastructure from neighbors, and that would help us, again, create value in the sense of not having to fully use those permits. Our plan is to submit them. Usually, in Oakland, it takes between three to six months for approval once they are submitted due to the public consultations and all the requirements. High level, that is where we are on permitting. Thanks, Martín. Can we have the next question? Thank you. Our next question comes from Stephane Foucaud from Auctus Advisors. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Good morning, guys. I had a question around regulation. I know you can't talk about pikes, so it is more general than that. In Colombia, I was wondering whether there would be any anti-competition restriction from the regulator, the government, with regards to when a player becomes too large or pipes too much in a certain region. Thanks, Stephane. Great question. Thanks for respecting and acknowledging the fact that we won't talk in detail around our engagement with Palex. I won't speculate, obviously, around a potential deal. I can tell you that in Colombia, there are obviously competition rulings that need to be taken into account for any deal. Not necessarily this one. As I said, we're not speculating. I'd say, Stephane, that there's additional things in terms of local requirements that need to be or would need to be considered in a deal that entails something like this or would entail something like this. Again, Stephane, thanks for respecting the fact that we won't talk in detail around our engagement with Palex. Thanks a lot. Can we have the next question, please? Thank you. Our next question comes from Daniel Guardiola from BTG. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Thank you. And good morning, Felipe, Jaime, Miguel, Maricata, and all the team. I have a couple of questions. I'm going to keep it brief so all my colleagues can actually ask questions. Considering that you guys talked about opportunities in Argentina, in Colombia, I wanted to ask you, Felipe, how would you rank, on a risk-adjusted basis, your value-accretive growth opportunities between both countries? That would be my first question. My second question, very briefly, I'm just curious, considering the current environment with the proposal from Parex, etc. I know you're not going to comment on that, and I don't want to push you to comment on that, but I was just wondering if you can provide any sort of indication of what is the expected MPV of the recently acquired assets of Argentina, assuming, of course, that everything goes in line with the plan. That would be my two questions. Thank you very much. Thanks, Daniel. And thanks for being in the call this morning. It's always good to hear from you. I'll start with the second question. Then I'll build on the first question. I know Jaime can provide a bit more color. The first thing I'd say is that there's already, I mean, when we did the deal in Vaca Muerta, which is transformative and it's strategic for us. If you remember from the investor day and the investor week, we said this is an opportunity, these two concessions that we have, that can bring some $300 million-$350 million of additional EBITDA in the next three to four years and 20,000 bbls, as Martín was explaining earlier in the call. In that sense, it's clearly accretive. I would also highlight something that Martín was saying. We're conducting all the. Required activities to ensure that we have designs and permits in place. In addition, we've talked to the operators in the region to look at spare and outage capacity in pipelines, in processing facilities. Always with the mindset of maximizing value for shareholders. This is very important. We have a plan. We have a plan for Vaca Muerta. We're looking at ways of optimizing and looking at optionality, if you will. I think that's point number one. The other thing is that we've disclosed some numbers around Vaca Muerta, and especially around volumes. We said that the 1P for the company, it would go from five to seven years, 2P all the way to 10 years. I'll share with you, Daniel, and everybody in the call, we're undergoing the review of reserves in Vaca Muerta. Remember that there's some information. That's public. That was the reserve certification at the end of last year. That we won't disclose. We can disclose. Where we are with the existing data, some of that is public data. We have the luxury of having the province of P as our partner in this deal. All of that. We expect to have positive numbers in terms of reserves going forward for Vaca Muerta. That would be accretive in terms of where we initially saw we were on the deal. I think that's very relevant. We've obviously gathered a lot more data. We're on the ground right now, and that's great. In terms of risk-adjusted basis for both countries, Colombia and Argentina, I talked about Argentina. In addition to what we have in Vaca Muerta already in the two concessions, I mentioned we're talking to operators in the region constantly. Martín and Tommy on the ground and Nacho and myself. We hold frequent conversations with operators to optimize. We also hold conversations on potential opportunities going forward. We mentioned this at the investor day. We're focused on what we have right now. We will remain very, very disciplined in terms of allocating capital and ensuring that everything that we bring into the portfolio has value with it. There's a lot of opportunity. When you think that only 10% of the basin in Vaca Muerta has been developed, it's, I think, clearly a world-class basin for unconventionals. That's that. In terms of Colombia, I'd say, and I highlight a few things, and Martín and Rodrigo gave us some of the good news around performance today, which is great. As operator of Llanos 34, we're performing very well. For example, Daniel, only 30% of Llanos 34 is covered with water flooding. We've increased the level of water floods. We've been very successful with shutoffs and redirecting the water. Even with the newly updated model of the field, we have a lot more data in terms of where to put the water and what are the expected results. Llanos 34, I think, provides a lot of additional optionality and upsides in that sense. I'll just say that's why, Daniel, and I know you were very respectful of not talking about Parex. I think that's why unanimously the board rejected the offer of $9 per share because it failed to reflect growth prospects, our portfolio that's diverse, and it's not in the best interest of shareholders. Clearly, Llanos 34 has a lot of legs still in it. That's the point I'm making. If you look at 123, I mean, great news. A field that's producing 5,000 bbls in just 24 months, it's great. It's a great story. Guess what? There's a lot of optionality. We're doing exploration and appraisal activity. There's full alignment with our partner, which is great. From a technical point of view, from the intent to conduct more activities in that sense. CPO-5 is doing very well, very, very well. We have a great relationship with ONGC. They're conducting their operations very, very well. It's actually performing above plan. I'd say, Daniel, that in that sense, having a portfolio that is in the two countries, Colombia and Argentina, and it's diversified in terms of conventionals and unconventionals, is great. Again, we see that in the upcoming year or so, with some potential changes in government as well. A government that's more prone to activity. That can only help our long-term plan. Be more robust or even more robust than it is today. I don't know, Jaime, if you want to add something. Thanks, Felipe. Perhaps I'll just delve a little bit deeper on the technical aspects of how we go about capital allocation. Those of you that have been following us and saw our presentation and the investor day probably will recall our capital allocation matrix, right? If you remember, that capital allocation process, basically, it's all geared towards driving value maximization, right? We consider aspects such as MPV, breakevens, capital efficiency. To your question, Daniel, we, of course, consider risk and time to market. We do it in a very intentional way, right, to make sure that things compete. This is probably not the right time to give you a specific indication of the expected MPV of Vaca Muerta and of our other assets. What I would say is that. Our portfolio allocation process is designed to deliver competitive returns, double-digit returns at a 15% discount rate, okay, and at a $60 Brent price. If you use those parameters of a 15% discount rate, $60 Brent price, delivering double-digit returns, that kind of gives you an indication of the sort of strength of the portfolio that we have at GeoPark and that we are building in Argentina. I think the other important point of note to mention is, of course, that given the recent elections in Argentina and the outcome of the recent elections in Argentina, clearly, the 15% discount rate seems quite stringent, given how the risk in Argentina is evolving. We are very comfortable around the value accretion of the assets, given the rigor that we've had in the capital allocation and in the recent developments that we've had there. Thank you. Thanks, Jaime. Daniel, before I turn it over to the next question, just want to highlight, and first, thanks for the question. As we've mentioned in the recent investor day and everything else, we have a plan that's robust. We have a strategy that's robust in terms of building in Colombia. I've mentioned a few of the additional things that we're looking at. I'd just like to go back to being very efficient and very focused in terms of how we conduct our operations. The fact that that long-term plan includes Vaca Muerta, the concessions, and that's accretive as well. It builds on what Jaime was talking about. Daniel, in the next few weeks, we'll be presenting the work program and budget for next year that will reflect this view on our strategy and how we deploy capital to ensure that we continue to bring accretive opportunities and we continue to provide value to shareholders. Thanks, Daniel. Gracias. Next question comes from Vicente Falonga from Bradesco. What are the risks related to your polymer injection project in Llanos 34? What could go wrong? What are the key operational milestones in terms of well results for GeoPark to de-risk its Argentina operations? Thanks, Vicente. I'll ask Rodrigo to talk about some of the aspects around polymer injection. Good, Vicente. Thank you for the question. As you know, polymer injection is a proven EUR technology with a solid track record. Not only here in Colombia, but also globally. Particularly in Los Llanos, in the neighborhood, we have some good examples. It is a proven technology, the firm message I want to deliver here. Obviously, there are certain risks that we have to manage during the implementation of this technology. The risks are related with subsurface uncertainties, operational execution, economic sensitivities. All of them are considered in the plan that we have. That is why there are, I think, two key elements in order to face those risks. The first one is related to how you are going to implement the project. What we think for the near future, actually for the present because we are working on it, is phase the implementation in different kinds of phases. We are going to start this year, at the end of this year, with two wells. We expect to finish next year with nine wells in terms of polymer injection in Tigana field. We see about 30 patterns for the full development for Jacana, sorry. Actually, we are working in something that is new for the development plan. It is in Tigana because at the moment, we have no injection, polymer injection in the north as well. We are designing that project to include in the development plan as soon as possible. The other thing that I consider as critical is the talent and the people. We hire experienced. The last year, we hired experienced people coming from other parts of Colombia. They have been injecting water in the Llanos Basin for the last 10 years, the same with polymer. We consider we have the expertise in place. We're working very seriously because polymer flood is one of the key elements in the development plan for the field. It's not the only one. It's one of those elements that we have in terms of maintaining the production of this big field. That is why we are very excited about the project. We believe that we have the capabilities to implement in the right and successful way. That is what we are doing right now because we expect in a couple of months to have the first well injecting polymers in the area. Thanks, Rodrigo. In terms of operational milestones of world results for de-risking operations in Argentina, Martín? Yeah. Vicente, thanks for your question. Let me start by saying that in terms of the milestones on well results, if we look at the two blocks that we acquired in Loma Jarillosa and in Puerto Silva Oeste, we're surrounded by active Vaca Muerta development. Within the blocks, as I mentioned before, Loma Jarillosa Este has six wells that are already drilled and on production. From the subsurface, the risk that we see is low. When we look at the activity that is coming and the drilling risk and operational risk, let me mention these two things. First one is, when we start drilling, we have the advantage that we will start with a pad that has been partially drilled. The pad number 1030 has five wells that have been drilled, out of which two wells are fully drilled. They're just waiting on the completion. The remaining three only need the last section, which is the horizontal, which would be around 2,500 m of the horizontal drilling. We will start with drilling operations that are not going full on one pad from zero. The second comment is one way to make sure that we are de-risking is our team. We have a very solid team that we had in place and we have completed. Let me give you a little bit more flavor of what I mean. We have some of the folks that are now in Argentina operating these blocks. They were already being part of the previous deal that we had as secondees. One year fully engaged as secondees in different roles. Prior to that, some of these guys, these men and women, were working in companies like Chevron, like YPF, like Pan American Energy. Our leaders in the ground in Argentina, they have each of them in the order of 10 years of unconventional experience, both in Argentina and in the U.S. With that team, we feel that we can go about de-risking the operations properly. Thanks, Martín. I will add something. Yes, I would add something related with the subsurface perspective. The blocks are geologically proven. The reservoir and the oil is down there. There are a couple of elements that support our confidence there. First of all, the previous operator in Loma Jarillosa drilled six wells. We have a lot of information coming from that subsurface database. Then we build a technical understanding, and we consider with all this information, at least for the north block, we have a very robust development plan with that information. At the same time, in Argentina, the production paywell is public. We can analyze all the neighborhoods. Actually, we did that. The expectation that we have in terms of well type is 1.1 million bbls and 1.3 million bbls per well for the full life of the wells. That is plenty in line with the neighborhood. That's another topic or at least point that adds confidence to our analysis. The third point is we have been for a year working with Phoenix in the south of this area, and we have the experience in Confluencia Norte. Confluencia Norte supports our understanding of Puerto Silva Oeste. And Este, sorry. That's why we believe that in terms of risk and manage the milestones for coming, we are very solid with the development plan. That's my contribution related with the subsurface. Thanks, Rodrigo. Thanks, Vicente. Do we have any more questions on the line? Next question is from Isabella Pacheco from Bank of America. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Hi, team. Thank you for taking my question. It's just a quick one. How much do you expect the Vaca Muerta acquisition will add to your 4Q 2025 production? Thank you. Martín? Yeah. Isabella, quick answer. For the 75 days that we will have Vaca Muerta on production, it's going to be in the order of 1,400 bbls-1,600 bbls of oil per day. For the quarter. Thanks, Martín. Great. Thanks, Isabella. Thank you very much. Thanks very much. Sorry. very much. Sorry. very much. Sorry. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question is from Alejandro Demichelis from Jefferies. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Yes. Thank you very much for taking my question. Chef, I know you're not going to be talking about products and so on, but maybe you can give us some indication of the rationale for keeping the poison pill still in place at this moment. Thanks, Alejandro. Good to have you on the call today. I'll give you my view on the poison pill, and this is something that we discussed at the board very early on. Remember, I joined earlier in the year, June 1. If you look at this from a shareholder's perspective, and this is part of the conversations we had at the board, we want to ensure that anybody who wants to acquire equities of the company or shares of the company and wants to build a position fully reflects a premium in terms of the purchase of those shares when the acquisition. At the end of the day, Alejandro, what we're looking for is for the right value, the right premium to be acknowledged. At the end of the day, it's something that would benefit all of the shareholders across the board. Yeah. I guess what I would add, Felipe, to this is if we look at the recent events, we've had a shareholder accumulating a position that has been basically capped in the market conditions, right? I would argue that it's actually enabling the conversation that we're having now, which is in the benefit of all shareholders, which is what is the premium over market price that's going to be recognized. Now more than ever, the poison pill makes sense, and that's why we are supportive of keeping it. Thanks, Jaime. Thanks, Alejandro. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you. We currently have no further questions, so I'll hand back to Felipe Bayon for closing remarks. Thank you so much. Again, thanks everybody for being here in the call today and for your interest in the company. Very thrilled with the performance we've had in 3Q. It's a very, very solid set of results that we've presented to the market in terms of our operations, our cost efficiencies, dealing with the reservoirs and ensuring that we maximize value. I'd like to acknowledge the teams that day in and day out are actually supporting these results. Very, very thrilled with that. Very, very happy with how the results are coming out and that we've presented to the market. The last thing is we had the roadshow and the investor day a couple of weeks back where we looked at our strategy going forward, and then maximizing value in Colombia through a very robust plan that's in place. With incorporating all of those efficiencies and technology and innovation. Also the work that Rodrigo was mentioning around exploration and appraisal and looking not only around new technologies and enhancing operations, but also around new opportunities in country. On top of that, a value-accretive, transformational strategic acquisition in Vaca Muerta. Those two in conjunction provide a very, very solid outlook in terms of value creation and maximizing value for shareholders. Thanks again, everyone, for being here in the call today. Again, I'd like just to thank the team, the GeoPark team, for everything that they do. Have a good day. This concludes today's call. Thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your line.