Good afternoon. My name is Chris, and I'll be your conference operator today. At this time, I'd like to welcome everyone to the Halozyme Q1 2023 Financial and Operating Results Conference Call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you'd like to ask a question during this time, simply press star then the number one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star one again. Please note this event is being recorded. I'll now turn the call over to Tram Bui, Halozyme's Vice President of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Please go ahead. Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, welcome to our Q1 2023 financial and operating results conference call. In addition to the press release issued today after the market closed, you can find a supplementary slide presentation that will be referenced during today's call in the Investor relations section of our website. Leading the call will be Dr. Helen Torley, Halozyme's President and Chief Executive Officer, who will provide an update on our business, and Nicole LaBrosse, our Chief Financial Officer, will review our financial results for the Q1 2023. On today's call, we will be making forward-looking statements as outlined on slide two. I would also refer you to our SEC filings for a full list of risks and uncertainties. During the call, both GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures will be discussed. Certain non-GAAP or adjusted financial measures are reconciled with the comparable GAAP financial measures in our earnings press release and slide presentation. I will now turn the call over to Helen Torley. Thank you, Tram, and good afternoon, everyone. Let me begin on slide three. Halozyme is a leading drug delivery platform company with a diversified and robust business, which includes our ENHANZE royalty business, our auto-injector technology business, and a specialty commercial portfolio. I'm pleased to report that we executed to our plan for the Q1 of 2023, achieving total revenue of $162 million, a 38% increase year-over-year. This performance sets us up well for the year, and we expect strong quarter-over-quarter revenue growth throughout 2023 that will result in another record revenue year. Turning now to slide four, I'm delighted with the breadth and momentum of our drug delivery business. Halozyme has established our leadership in rapid subcutaneous drug delivery with ENHANZE and more recently with our differentiated auto-injectors. Our partners are making strong progress with their commercialization and development activities that are expected to result in strong and durable long-term growth. Drivers of this growth include the potential approvals of eptinezumab subQ and atezolizumab subQ this year that will bring our approved products generating royalties from five products to seven products. two additional blockbuster drugs, OCREVUS subQ and Afibo subQ, continue in phase III development with the potential to launch by 2025. An additional 2 products, amivantamab subQ and relatlimab-nivolumab subQ fixed-dose combination, also continue in phase III clinical testing, the final stage before a potential launch and royalty generation, with the potential to launch between 2025 and 2027. It is our goal to add to our already robust pipeline by adding 3 new agreements this year for ENHANZE Plus or high-volume auto-injector, and also a small volume auto-injector agreement. Turning to slide five, let me spend a moment on why so many partners are focused on and are so excited about subcutaneous drug delivery with ENHANZE. ENHANZE, when co-formulated with our partner products, has demonstrated an ability to differentiate the subcutaneous product from IV. SubQ delivery decreases treatment time and treatment burden for patients. This, in turn, results in an improved patient experience, with patients stating a strong preference for subQ in surveys. There may also be, as we saw in the case of DARZALEX subcutaneous, a lower rate of infusion-related reactions. This can also translate into considerable advantages to the healthcare system. These advantages include less use of more costly hospitals and infusion centers and less use of healthcare practitioner time, a growing consideration in all regions of the world. Moving now to slide six, I'll provide an overview of our ENHANZE pipeline. We describe this in terms of waves, with waves one and two the already launched products, the wave three products, those that have the potential to launch between 2023 and 2025, and the wave four products are those with the potential to launch between 2025 and 2027. I'll go into more detail on waves two, three, and four in a moment, but before I do so, let me highlight an exciting event for one of our wave one products. Takeda received FDA approval for an expanded indication for HYQVIA to treat primary immunodeficiency in children. HYQVIA is now available to a broader community impacted by primary immunodeficiency who may prefer flexible treatment options in the management of these disorders. ENHANZE is a key value driver for our partners, our extensive development pipeline supports our expectations for royalty revenues to reach approximately $1 billion in 2027, with potential for growth beyond that. This projected growth is driven by new launches and the projected impact of co-formulation patents. Let me now move to slide seven for an overview of our royalty revenues. We project $445 million-$455 million in royalty revenue in 2023, 23%-26% growth over 2022. Quarterly royalty revenues increased 43% year-over-year to $99.6 million. We project strong quarter-on-quarter growth throughout 2023. Five partner products using the ENHANZE drug delivery technology and commercialized in approximately 100 global markets are contributing to royalty revenue growth to date, with DARZALEX sub Q and Phesgo our wave two products, the key growth drivers. While we project the approval of eptinezumab sub Q and Tecentriq sub Q in the United States in 2023, we assume virtually no royalty revenues in 2023 from these products due to launch timing and the standard time it takes for physicians to be confident regarding reimbursement. Also included in our royalty revenue is revenue from our small volume auto injector business. This remains stable and largely driven by Teva's generic EpiPen. Moving now to slide eight, I'll provide more details on DARZALEX. Janssen's DARZALEX continues its amazing growth story, growing approximately 26% year-over-year on an operational basis in the Q1 of 2023 to approximately $2.3 billion. This increase was driven by share gains in all regions, continued growth of the market and strong adoption of DARZALEX FASPRO, the subcutaneous formulation with ENHANZE. J&J expects DARZALEX to continue to grow in the first line setting. Analysts are now projecting annual DARZALEX sales will reach $16.5 billion in 2028. DARZALEX sub Q is the globally established choice of physicians using DARZALEX for myeloma patients with a share of 88% in the United States and as last reported by Janssen, now exceeding 80% outside the United States. The key metric we now track is the overall brand performance as this is driven by the sub Q. DARZALEX subcutaneous is a key growth driver of our royalty revenues in 2023 and will continue to contribute meaningfully until at least 2030. Turning now to Roche's Phesgo on slide nine. Phesgo is a combination of Perjeta and Herceptin for subcutaneous injection for patients with early and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. This allows for a single five to eight-minute subcutaneous treatment compared with a lengthier IV treatment schedule. Roche recently reported that 85% of patients preferred Phesgo's subcutaneous administration over the intravenous formulation of Perjeta and Herceptin. Over the Q1 of 2023, Roche reported Phesgo sales of approximately CHF 240 million, an increase of 72% year-over-year. In the initial 30 launch countries, Phesgo share is now 35%, exceeding 40% outside the United States, with the U.S. and Germany approaching 20%. Roche, with their focus on patients, is a pioneer who clearly recognizes the benefits of subcutaneous drug delivery for patients and for the healthcare system overall. We project continued growth from Phesgo in 2023 and beyond. Roche is also developing a path for patient self-administration of Phesgo with an on-body injector and expect pivotal phase I data from this program in the second half of the year. Up are our wave 3 products which are shown on slide 10. These products represent the next set of royalty revenue opportunities for Halozyme, with potential launches projected between 2023 and 2025. The wave 3 products are subcutaneous efgartigimod, atezolizumab, nivolumab and ocrelizumab, all of which are approved in at least one indication as an IV formulation. This gives us confidence in the likelihood of approval for ENHANZE-enabled subcutaneous versions of these products. I will summarize the key advancements and events occurring this year with this exciting portfolio where analysts project total sales, including IV and sub Q, to reach approximately $35 billion in 2028. argenx's subcutaneous efgartigimod for generalized myasthenia gravis has an FDA PDUFA date of June 20, 2023. argenx has also submitted a marketing authorization application to the European Medical Agency. Analysts predict potential total efgartigimod annual revenue of approximately $7 billion in 2028. The launch of the IV formulation is certainly progressing well, with a reported $401 million in 2022 and growth of 25% quarter-over-quarter to $218 million in the Q1 of this year. We are excited that subcutaneous efgartigimod has the potential to be the first of our wave three partner launches, with US approval and commercial launch projected mid-year 2023. On their recent quarterly call, argenx management commented on the importance of gaining traction in early line patients for the continued trajectory, and that the subcutaneous approval may help achieve this. As argenx's flagship pipeline product, efgartigimod is being developed for the treatment of multiple autoimmune disease indications, with subcutaneous development currently in six indications. I will note that four of these indications to date are subcutaneous-only indications. argenx has announced plans to expand and add additional indications, including a new study plan for thyroid eye disease for later this year. argenx projects multiple data readouts in 2023. This includes data in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy now in July of 2023. Two additional phase III data readouts are projected for the Q4 of 2023 in two additional serious autoimmune conditions, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura and pemphigus. I'll move now to Roche. At the beginning of the year, Roche announced their BLA to the FDA for subcutaneous atezolizumab with ENHANZE was accepted with a PDUFA date of September 15th, 2023. Subcutaneous atezolizumab has the potential to offer greater convenience for patients and physicians with an approximately 7-minute subcutaneous administration time compared to 30 to 60 minutes for IV treatment. Roche believes this represents a significant advancement for patients, the healthcare system where resources are constrained, as well as for payers. In the Q1 of 2023, Roche reported IV tocilizumab revenues of CHF 920 million, an increase of 15% year-over-year, driven by higher demand in the U.S. and in Europe. Roche also reported Q1 2023 revenues of CHF 1.6 billion for OCREVUS, which represents an increase of 14% year-over-year and annualizes at over $7 billion. OCREVUS is our third Wave 3 opportunity. With more than 300,000 patients treated globally, OCREVUS remains the number one treatment in the U.S. and EU5, both in terms of total share and new to brand share, with a higher retention rate than other therapies for multiple sclerosis. The goal with subcutaneous OCREVUS is to significantly shorten the treatment and observation time compared to the IV, where the IV is currently 3.5-6 hours. With the data readout for the phase III trial of subcutaneous ocrelizumab with ENHANZE expected later this year, subcutaneous delivery could lower the target total administration and observation time for the first and second dose to 1 hour and to just 10 minutes for administration and observation for each subsequent dose. Roche is excited that the subcutaneous data will provide an opportunity to expand the market and provide access to patients for whom intravenous dosing is not viable. Moving now to our fourth Wave 3 product, nivolumab. BMS reported Opdivo IV sales of $2.2 billion in the Q1 of 2023, an increase of 15% year-over-year, or 17% excluding FX. BMS believes that subcutaneous delivery of drug pushes science forward. They are progressing with their phase III registration study of subcutaneous nivolumab utilizing ENHANZE in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Our Wave 3 products represent substantial de-risk near-term new royalty revenue opportunity for Halozyme, driven by two potential approvals this year and the phase III readout of subcutaneous ocrelizumab. The opportunity represented here in terms of analyst projections for total product sales is approximately $35 billion in 2028, which is significantly higher than the opportunity for our Wave 2 products, which are driving our strong royalty revenue growth today. Moving to slide 11, I'll review our Wave 4 partner product development pipeline with ENHANZE. Our longer-term growth trajectory is further supported by these Wave 4 products with potential launches in the 2025-2027 time frame. Wave 4 is comprised of 10 partner products, 2 of which are in phase III, and the remaining 8 are in ongoing phase I clinical testing or have completed phase I. In 2023 and beyond, our goal is to continue to expand the number of products in development and to advance products through development to regulatory approval and launch, adding multiple new royalty revenue streams. The two most advanced products are Janssen's subcutaneous amivantamab and BMS' fixed-dose combination of nivolumab plus relatlimab with ENHANZE. Both are already approved, enjoying strong growth as IV treatments, and are in phase III clinical testing as sub-Q versions. Janssen initiated their phase III study of lazertinib plus amivantamab with ENHANZE in 2022 in patients with EGFR mutated advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Recently, BMS also initiated the phase III study, RELATIVITY-047, with the goal of demonstrating that drug exposure level of nivolumab plus relatlimab fixed-dose combination with ENHANZE is not inferior to IV administration of the same combination, with this study being done in patients with previously untreated metastatic or unresectable melanoma. Other notable programs in our Wave 4 pipeline include a focus on innovation for HIV. ViiV's cabotegravir and Janssen's rilpivirine, both already approved as IM and oral delivery, are in phase I development as subcutaneous drugs with ENHANZE. ViiV has stated their goal with subcutaneous delivery is to further extend the dosing interval, thereby further freeing patients of the burden of treatment and the disease. ViiV is also in phase I development with N6LS, a development-stage broadly neutralizing antibody for HIV. I'll move now to our new growth opportunities. We remain highly engaged in new partnership discussions for ENHANZE and our auto-injectors. I'm excited that the funnel of discussions is at an all-time high, driven by high interest in subcutaneous drug delivery. While the timing is always difficult to predict, we are confident that we will achieve our goals for 2023 for 1 new ENHANZE deal, 1 new ENHANZE Plus high-volume auto-injector deal, and 1 new small-volume auto-injector deal. We're experiencing strong interest in learning more about our high-volume auto-injector for rapid delivery of up to 10 mL, which is enabled by ENHANZE. This approach will offer a truly differentiated opportunity for patient-friendly, high-volume subcutaneous drug delivery that can be utilized across a spectrum of disease areas for both small molecule drugs and biologics. We have a working prototype ready for clinical testing and expect to initiate and complete human feasibility studies by mid-year. We look forward to signing an agreement with a current or a new partner to collaborate on the custom development and are tracking nicely towards this goal. I'll turn now to our commercial portfolio, which includes XYOSTED and TLANDO, are shown in slide 12. XYOSTED is our weekly, virtually painless subcutaneous testosterone replacement treatment, which is patient delivered by auto-injector. Our growth strategy remains focused on converting patients from intramuscular injections, the most common treatment approach to date. In the quarter, we saw strong growth of XYOSTED physician demand, achieving new weekly high average prescription performance every month. We successfully navigated the Q1 resetting of the high deductible for commercial patients through our co-pay card program, helping ensure affordability was not a barrier for starting or staying on XYOSTED. Sales to wholesalers slightly lagged demand in the quarter as a result of a change in our 3PL distribution channel. Our goal remains to achieve approximately $100 million in XYOSTED revenue in 2023, representing a 20% increase from the run rate following the acquisition. We're also still focused on gaining access for TLANDO, our oral testosterone treatment. To date, we have not yet reached agreement with pharmacy benefit managers on an appropriate rebate rate, and until access is established, we are projecting low revenues for TLANDO in 2023. Before I hand the call over to Nicole, let me reiterate our commitment to our strategic growth and capital allocation priorities, which are shown on slide 13. We are committed to maximizing our revenue growth and durability to create long-term value for all of our stakeholders. We're investing strategically in ENHANZE and our auto-injector technologies while continuing to return capital to shareholders with our share buyback plan. We've completed $500 million of the $750 million three-year share buyback program, which was approved by the board of directors in December of 2021. This includes a $150 million share buyback completed in the first quarter of 2023. We're also actively evaluating M&A opportunities, seeking additional platforms or companies with de-risked assets or platforms or technologies where we see the opportunity for significant revenue growth and durability. I'll now turn the call over to Nicole to discuss our financial results for the Q1 of 2023. Nicole? Thank you, Helen. The Q1 of 2023 is on track with our plans and supports our strong financial performance expectations for the full year. As Helen mentioned, we remain committed to our capital allocation strategy. In regards to our share buyback program, we are pleased that within the Q1, we maximized our repurchase opportunity and completed the $150 million planned for the year, resulting in the repurchase of 4.2 million shares at an average price per share of $36.01. Our share buyback programs have resulted in the repurchase of 34.8 million shares since 2019, which contributed $0.09 to non-GAAP earnings per share in the Q1. Our cash equivalents, and marketable securities were $275.6 million as of March 31st, 2023, compared to $362.8 million on December 31st, 2022, due to our Q1 share repurchases. Our balance sheet remains strong with projected cash generation and EBITDA growth in 2023. Our net debt to EBITDA ratio is 3.2 as of March 31, 2023, which is expected to be less than 3 by the end of the year. While we have completed our share repurchases allocated for the year, we will continuously evaluate our future use of capital and monitor market conditions and other factors while also preserving capital to fund revenue growth and durability via M&A. I'll now move to slide 14 for our detailed financial results for the Q1 of 2023. Revenue for the Q1 was $162 million compared to $117.3 million for the Q1 of 2022. The 38% year-over-year increase was driven by an increase in royalty revenue, primarily attributable to subcutaneous DARZALEX and the addition of product sales as a result of Antares Pharma acquisition. Royalty revenue for the quarter was $99.6 million, an increase of 43% compared to $69.6 million in the prior year period. I'll mention that royalty revenue for the quarter saw a small sequential decline of 6% from $106 million in the Q4 of 2022. This is due to the expected impact of changes in FX rates, annual royalty rate tiers, and EpiPen seasonality. Some of our contracts include tiered royalties that escalate annually as volumes build over the course of the year. The threshold for increased rates was exceeded in Q1, and therefore, the increased rates will apply for the remainder of the year. Amortization of intangibles was $17.8 million in the Q1 due to the acquisition in which Halozyme acquired intangible assets that are amortized over a useful life related to the auto-injector technology platform, XYOSTED, and TLANDO. We project amortization of intangibles to be similar for each quarter in 2023. Research and development expenses for the Q1 was $18 million compared to $11.9 million in the Q1 of 2022, primarily due to an increase in compensation expense related to the ongoing combined larger workforce to support the device platform in regulatory, quality, and manufacturing. As well as planned investments in ENHANZE. SG&A expenses were $37.4 million, compared to $13.8 million for the Q1 of 2022, primarily due to an increase in compensation expenses related to the ongoing combined larger workforce, including the addition of commercial resources in sales and marketing for our testosterone replacement therapy products. EBITDA in the quarter, $74.3 million, compared to $76.4 million in the Q1 of 2022. The year-over-year comparison reflects a $25 million milestone payment in the Q1 of 2022, which did not repeat in the Q1 of 2023, as well as the impact of year-over-year increases in operating expenses. GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.29 in the Q1, and non-GAAP diluted earnings per share was $0.47. Turning now to our 2023 guidance on slide 15. We are reaffirming our full year 2023 guidance. We expect total revenues of $815 million-$845 million, representing growth between 23%-28% over 2022 total revenue. We expect total revenue to be primarily driven by continued strength in ENHANZE wave two products, DARZALEX SC and Phesgo, as well as a full year of Antares product sales and auto-injector royalty contribution. We expect revenue from royalties to increase between 23%-26% over revenue from royalties in 2022 to a range of $445 million-$455 million. Please note again that our 2023 guidance includes milestone payments for the approval of SC efgartigimod and atezolizumab, Conservative royalty revenue contributions from these two products within this year. We expect EBITDA of $415 million-$440 million, representing growth of more than 30% over 2022 EBITDA, which excludes the impact of the amortization costs related to the Antares acquisition. Finally, we expect non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $2.50-$2.65. With that, I'll now turn the call back over to Helen. Thank you, Nicole. I'd like to thank the Halozyme team and our partners and collaborators for the strong progress made in the Q1 of this year that's setting us up for such strong growth in 2023. We're continuing to look forward to our commercial product and royalty revenue growth, projecting we'll increase the number of ENHANZE commercial partner products from five to seven products with the approvals of subcutaneous eptinezumab and atezolizumab. We also expect pipeline progress and expansion with phase III data for subcutaneous ocrelizumab and for subcutaneous eptinezumab, as well as two new targets entering the clinic from our current partners. Continued progress in the development of our high-volume auto-injectors in ENHANZE is expected, as well as adding new collaboration partners with the goal of signing multiple new collaboration agreements across our platform. We continue to expect revenue growth resulting from our commercial products. These events all support our strong full-year revenue and EBITDA growth guidance. With that, we would now be delighted to take your questions. Operator, would you please open the call? If you'd like to ask a question, please press star then one on your telephone keypad. Our first question is from Jessica Fye with JP Morgan. Your line is open. Hey, guys. This is Na Sun on for Jessica Fye. I think, can you talk about what have you seen with the IRA impact and how has it impacted discussions with current partners and/or potential new partners? Another one is thinking about how we are anticipating a step down in royalty rate for FASPRO in the EU. What does this mean for other J&J targets set to launch after 2024 and 2027, such as amivantamab and rilpivirine? Thank you. Thanks, Na. With regard to what we've seen on IRA impact, I think, we are making comments very similar to our partners and other people who are talking that there still is too little detail available yet to be able to do any assessment, to understand if there is going to be impact. Recall, the guidance that came out initially really is focused on Part D as in dog, and the majority of our products are Part B. I will say that this very rarely has come up from any of our current partners, just I think really based on the fact that they are waiting for more details to come out from CMS before really doing any analysis on it to understand any impact. We continue to be excited about the growth of our products, and the royalties as we look forward to the potential for $1 billion in 2027 and project the potential to be higher than that in 2031. With regard to the step down in royalty rates, yeah, the specific details in all of our contracts, as you know, are confidential. We obviously in light of the European patent finding did give some commentary on the DARZALEX specifically. We're really not in a position to provide any additional detail beyond that at this time. The next question is from Corinne Jenkins with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Good afternoon, everyone. Maybe to one follow-on from the last question. It sounds like your current partners aren't bringing it up to you, but how is, like, the IRA guidance factoring into any conversations that you're having with potential partners? The second one for me, you referenced business development. I'm curious how the integration of Antares and your target leverage goals factor into potential timing for any additional BD. Yeah. I'm happy to take the first part, and I'll ask Nicole to discuss the target leverage. You know, I would say since the guidance came out in March, Corinne, we have been in multiple conversations with potential new partners for ENHANZE and ENHANZE plus HVAI. I do not believe I can remember IRA coming up even in those conversations. I really think it is because the majority of people who have got drugs that are the large volume injectables are in Part B, and everybody recognizes that the guidance that's come out so far isn't related to that. We're really not having conversations of any frequency with regard to that. Nicole, will you take the question on the target leverage and thinking about future M&A? Yes, happy to. Thanks, Corinne. When looking at our leverage for ending the quarter, we were at 3.2 times a net debt to EBITDA ratio, and we're tracking to be delevered to less than 3 times by the end of the year. We are tracking nicely with our expectations, and also provides ample opportunity for future growth via M&A, you know, looking at our leverage profile as well as our expected cash flow generation and expected EBITDA growth. Okay, thanks. The next question is from Mohit Bansal with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Great. Thank you for taking my question. I have a couple of questions. One on IRA, just staying with the team here. Do you expect some more clarity over a period of next six to 12 months from CMS, more about the Part B side of it? Should we expect something like that in your conversations with your partners? The other question is actually more technical in terms of, you know, You mentioned that sequential royalties, because they get reset, so the royalty revenues are not despite the revenues are higher, royalty revenues are not higher. That, that explains it. Are there... Is there anything else in terms of the Antares revenues or other pro-prior revenues, in terms of seasonality we should be aware about, in the Q1 as we go forward here? Thank you. Yeah. I'll take the question on IRA, Nicole will talk about the sequential royalties. Mohit, probably, as you're probably seeing with many of our large pharma partners, there simply isn't the information available at the moment as to when CMS is going to talk with regard to the Part B guidance. Nobody is really talking or speculating with regard to that. As you know, ENHANZE is an active ingredient. The subQ injection would not be possible without ENHANZE. We also are seeing benefits, like as an example of DARZALEX, reduced infusion-related reactions. We look forward to, you know, learning more, but recognize that we are going to be communicating very strongly that ENHANZE brings a lot of active benefits to patients with regard to being part of the new combinations with the subQ DARZALEX. In regards to sequential royalty, quarter-over-quarter, yeah, we did mention a few factors driving that, one of them being the FX rates changing year-over-year. The other one being royalty tiers that escalate during the year. That is something that we see on both the ENHANZE and the Entaris royalty side to answer your question there. Importantly, those thresholds, it's really only impactful to the first few months of the year, and those thresholds are exceeded within the Q1. It does not impact the remainder of the year. The also item we see in Q1 is EpiPen royalties do have a seasonal pattern where Q1 is the lowest of the year. That's just a little bit more flavor on seasonality. Overall, our quarterly results for royalties are tracking very nicely to our plans and our expectations to meet the guidance we set out for the year, which is $445 million-$455 million for the year, representing greater than 20% year-over-year growth for royalties. Helpful. Thank you. The next question is from Michael DiFiore with Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Hi, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Yeah, two more ones on the IRA, different versions. Just regarding CMS' Part D guidance document, I think for now everyone's operating under the assumption that Part B will look very much like Part D. Assuming that's true, now that Halo's lawyers and policy teams has had some time to fully digest the guidance document, are there any nuances contained therein that perhaps make you incrementally more or less confident on how ENHANZE formulated products may qualify as single source drugs? That's my first question. My other question is that, just can you remind us how the EU, the EPO DARZALEX FASPRO patent revocation is specific to just DARZALEX FASPRO and why there wouldn't be any read across to your other EU co-formulation patents. Thank you. All right. Thanks, Mike, for those questions. Yes, a lot of interest obviously in the IRA. We talked about this a lot when the guidance came out, and if we, if there is an interpretation or the Part B guidance comes out similar to the Part D, our interpretation based on experts in Washington D.C. is if you focus on the part of the guidance that describes the fixed-dose combination, then they actually use an example of two corticosteroid drugs, and talks about the both active ingredients not being considered the same as a single agent used alone. I think that is what we see as a perfect description of ENHANZE. Because the rHuPH20 is designated in multiple documents from the FDA as an active ingredient. Now, why is that? It's because, as I mentioned earlier, it does make the whole subcutaneous delivery possible. That allows for a shorter injection. It allows for reduced infusion-related reactions on occasion. Frankly, patients would not be able to receive their therapy in such a simple, short way, nor would the healthcare system be able to accrue the benefits of the shorter time. Certainly our reading at this point in time, if it's identical, is that the sub Q will be treated as a separate single source agent than the IV drugs. But with all the appropriate caveats that CMS has to issue the specific guidance for Part B. Moving to the EU patent, yes, I think for people a few weeks ago, Janssen had one of their 2 approved European co-formulation patents for DARZALEX revoked, and they still have, I'll note, another one that's under review. This was a single revocation of the 1st patent. They have a 2nd patent that remains, as well as another patent pending. This was a specific instance where with the judgment of the court that because Janssen had published a clinical trial protocol that mentioned the invention that they relied on in the patent before they filed the patent, meant that they were not able to use that invention, which was reduced infusion-related reactions, to support that particular patent. The reason this is only applying for this single patent from DARZALEX is that other of our partners relied on other inventions to support their patents. One of the core things about co-formulation patents is it has to be novel, not described before an invention. By definition, all of our partners are looking at their data to look for something different. That, that's why there's no read-through to any of the other patents that are filed or any of our other European partners. Companies are careful to make sure that they do get the filings first to the patent office before they make the data public. I'll also just comment that, just in case anyone has the question, any, U.S., the U.S. does not have the same exact approach as Europe with regard to this pre-publication in a clinical protocol. There's no read-through to the United States either. I'll just also comment the next step in Europe could be for Janssen to file an appeal. If Janssen did file an appeal, the patent would be unrevoked. Usually the appeal process can take three to four years. Again, I'll also mention that Janssen continues to have other patents. For Halozyme, we're very confident in our revenues in 2023, and to continue to receive royalties from Janssen until at least 2030. There was attention to this, but we certainly are feeling very well about our Janssen royalties and the very strong growth that we're seeing there. Very helpful. Thank you. The next question is from Jason Butler with JMP. Your line is open. Hi. It's Roy for Jason. Thanks for taking our questions. Just a couple. I guess, Helen, you mentioned the funnel of partnering discussions are at an all-time high. Just assuming that those are mostly candidates seeking their first approval, as enhanced formulations. Sorry, Roy, you cut up a little bit. You're saying are those companies looking for approvals of their first indication? Yeah. development stage products or, commercial products? Yes. Development stage. Correct. I would say it's a mixture. It's a mixture of both of those. Okay. You know, we've traditionally worked with companies, where they're getting to their phase III approval or they're already approval or approved. That's because ENHANZE can really help enhance the competitiveness of a product. We are talking more and more and have some very interesting conversations ongoing with companies who are looking at the optimizing their PK profile. That's a different approach where you're not trying to bridge to the already approved, but you could do something if you have a Cmax, for example, associated toxicity, ENHANZE can help with that, or you want to get to a very extended dosing interval. A very nice mix of discussions, Roy. Okay. Interesting. Then one on the you mentioned that, 10 ml auto-injector, a collaboration partner, for further development. Just what are they gonna bring to the table that you didn't get from Antares? Thanks. it actually is One of the I think very intriguing things about the Antares portfolio of auto-injectors and the engineers that we have is that we've traditionally offered partners the option to customize a device for a specific patient population or disease. What we have is a working prototype. Each partner will have to determine what their primary container they want it to be. There'll be a little bit of customization. Some might be 5 mL, 7 mL, you know, 10 mL. That will take a little bit of work, but specifically the form factors and other factors like needle depth and other are things each partner generally will like to customize to be right for their particular drug and their populations and their target population. It simply is that customization work for it to move from prototype to a development stage, auto-injector to a commercial auto-injector. Okay, great. I'm gonna throw in one more. The DARZALEX injection site reaction results that you mentioned, is that achievable with a lower dose of ENHANZE than you use to achieve the subq injection itself? If that makes sense. I understand your question. I don't think we ever tested that because in our clinical studies with subq DARZALEX, it was only one dose of the rHuPH20 used in each injection, to my knowledge, Roy. I think it's a very small dose. I don't think there was a dose ranging for rHuPH20. We know the amount it takes, so it was probably never tested. I will say it's a very small dose that's used in all of our products. Got it. Thank you. The next question is from David Risinger with SVB Securities. Your line is open. Yes. Sorry. Thanks very much. I have a couple questions, please. First, the press release mentions planned investments in ENHANZE. I was hoping that you could provide some more color on that, Helen, particularly since ENHANZE is set to lose US exclusivity in 2027. Just a couple of financial questions. What was the impact of Antares on the non-GAAP earnings or EPS in the quarter? Regarding share repurchases, did you mention that you have finished that up for the year? Thanks very much. Yeah. I'll take the first question, and then I'll ask Nicole to take the next two. With regard to the planned investments, this really relates back to an announcement we made maybe 18 months ago with regard to starting the development of a high-yield rHuPH20, as well as a room temperature stable rHuPH20. As David, we, you know, for our royalty term, I'll just highlight that we always receive in the vast majority of cases, a minimum of 10 years after the first commercial sale. 2027 might be patent expiry, but we are going to be selling API to our partners and generating royalties till well past 2030 based on our development portfolio. We thought it was important for us to continue to invest to get to a higher yield API because that would be the expectation of our partners that we would continue to improve the processes. We also start the development of a more room temperature stable one that might be more suitable for small molecules, and circumstances where partners might want the patients to be able to carry, for example, an auto-injector around with them. That one continues in early development. We're making good progress with the high-yield one, and partners have expressed a lot of interest in that, obviously as that, it just, it helps us strengthen our ability to continue to supply a very high-quality API for our partners. Was that? Yes. Thanks, David. With regards to Antares' contribution, it was accretive, obviously to our revenue line and to our non-GAAP EPS, in the quarter and continues to, our expectation is that it continues to be accretive for the full year results for 2023. In regards to share repurchases, we did complete the full amount that we had allocated for the year, which was $150 million. We took the opportunity in the Q1 to maximize our buying during low prices. We were able to accelerate that and buy at the low prices and fully complete the amount that we had allocated for the year. Thank you. The next question is from Eun Yang with Jefferies. Your line is open. Hi, this is Mack on for Eun. you know, just continuing on the ENHANZE partnering conversations with the next-gen rHuPH20, have you identified any partners who are specifically interested in these next-gen APIs? If so, when will the improved products be ready for clinical investigation? Thank you. Yeah. Different pathways for each of them. The higher yield one is the same cell line as our current one. It's much more likely that will be a simple comparability study that will be done, and it will be then moved into the supply chain, and we've done that before. This will take several years, but it should be a pretty seamless transition. We've got several of our partners who have expressed interest in moving to that, obviously once it is approved and available. With regard to the more room temperature stable, and we continue in discussions on that was seen as being a bit more specific to small molecules and a bit of specific setting where room temperature stability is needed. Nobody has signed up at this point in time. Never expect it to be a large driver of revenue because it's our Subcu products are much more focused on the large volume biologics where room temperature stability is not needed because the product has to be refrigerated. Very pleased with the progress and the interest we've seen on the higher yields continuing to have this offering for those partners who might want something that's more suitable for a small molecule and patient self-administration. Again, that's star one if you'd like to ask a question. The next question is from Caroline Palomeque with Berenberg Capital Markets. Your line is open. Hi. Thanks for taking the question. Can you discuss the current IV to SubQ conversion rate trajectory for other products, aside from the ones in your slide, such as MabThera SC and HYQVIA? Thanks. Caroline, if I was understanding your question, what we saw, with the wave one products, and those were predominantly launched, in Europe. Herceptin is a good example. That got to about 50% share of sales after two years, and it got to 60% share of sales after three years. Biosimilars entered the market at that period of time, and I can say that, we do hear from Roche that the share has remained sticky in those markets where it did convert, but it didn't continue to grow after that. We don't have specific data on Hyqvia for me to be able to share. MabThera SC got to about 40% share of sales. You know, we're seeing a range. We're obviously, We're very pleased to see DARZALEX up there at 88% in the U.S., greater than 80% outside the U.S. Really, it's very clear now that the SubQ is driving that amazing revenue growth of overall DARZALEX that you're seeing by aiding the penetration into the front line and second line populations, which are the larger populations when patients stay on therapy longer. You know, we usually think about a target of around 60% conversion at three years, and then we look at the products and we say, "Do we think it's going to be a bit higher than that? Is it going to be a bit lower than that?" But overall, very pleased with the progress we're seeing. I'll just point out Phesgo, after a slow start, some very nice quarter-over-quarter growth, and now 35% share with Roche. I was expecting continued conversion as physicians and patients really do see the benefit of this, particularly in the adjuvant setting. That's helpful. Thanks. We have no further questions at this time, and this will conclude today's conference call. Thank you everyone for participating. You may now disconnect.