Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. My name is Abby, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the third quarter 2023 The Hartford Financial Results Webcast. Today's call is being recorded, and all lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during that time, simply press the star key followed by the number 1 on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star 1 a second time. Thank you, and I will now turn the conference over to Susan Spivak, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations. You may begin. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today for our call and webcast on third quarter 2023 earnings. Yesterday, we reported results and posted all the earnings-related material on our website. For the call today, our participants are Chris Swift, Chairman and CEO of The Hartford; Beth Costello, Chief Financial Officer; Jonathan Bennett, Group Benefits; Stephanie Bush, Small Commercial and Personal Lines; and Mo Tooker, Middle and Large Commercial and Global Specialty. Just a few comments before Chris begins. Today's call includes forward-looking statements as defined under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results could be materially different. We do not assume any obligation to update information or forward-looking statements provided on this call. Investors should also consider the risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ from these statements. A detailed description of those risks and uncertainties can be found in our SEC filings. Our commentary today include non-GAAP financial measures. Explanations and reconciliations of these measures to the comparable GAAP measure are included in our SEC filings, as well as in the news release and financial supplement. Finally, please note that no portion of this conference call may be reproduced or rebroadcast in any form without The Hartford's prior written consent. Replays of this webcast and an official transcript will be available on The Hartford's website for one year. I'll now turn the call over to Chris. Good morning, and thank you for joining us. The Hartford's third quarter financial and operational performance builds upon the momentum achieved in the first half of the year. Once again, commercial lines and group benefits, which in aggregate represent over 85% of earned premium, delivered exceptional results. We continue to expand our strong competitive position, successfully executing on priorities and delivering superior returns for shareholders. Let me now call your attention to highlights from the third quarter. Top-line growth in Commercial Lines of 8% with an underlying combined ratio of 87.8. Strong pricing across P&C, including double-digit increases in commercial property, personal lines, auto and home. Group Benefits fully insured premium growth of 8% with a core earnings margin of 9.8%. Strong investment performance with reinvestment rates climbing to 6%, driving higher portfolio yield and a trailing twelve-month core earnings ROE of 14.9%. These results are outstanding and keep us on track to deliver a full year core earnings ROE in the range of 14%-15%. As I look across the markets, the U.S. economy has remained resilient, and recent data points, including robust payroll, strong retail sales, and solid levels of industrial production, point to an environment which continues to be supportive of The Hartford's businesses. Now let me dive deeper into the third quarter performance by business. In small commercial, written premiums were $1.2 billion, with 16% growth in new business and another sub-90 underlying margin. Our best-in-class package product, which we call Spectrum, continues to outperform in a competitive marketplace, contributing new business premium of approximately $100 million, up 20% over prior year. In addition, written premium for excess and surplus lines grew 34% in the quarter, with new business growth of over 50%. We expect E&S premium to approach $200 million for the full year. I am incredibly pleased with the overall performance in small commercial, which continues to deliver outstanding results with industry-leading products and unmatched ease of conducting business and unrivaled pricing accuracy. This business is poised to exceed $5 billion of written premium this year. Middle and large commercial had another great quarter. Written premiums grew 5%, reflecting strong rate execution and new business growth in our excess lines. Our General Industries property book grew 13%, while large property grew 15%. Looking across commercial lines, we are taking a thoughtful and disciplined approach to grow property premium within favorable market conditions to a level approaching $2.5 billion for the full year or a 25% increase. We are focused on managing our cat exposure, as evidenced by our year-to-date cat losses, which were lower than our market share. Coming back to middle and large commercial, underlying margins were exceptional, reflecting the advancements made in data science capabilities, pricing, and underwriting tools. Margins also benefited from favorable property losses. Those advancements, combined with our best-in-class talent, position us well to sustain profitable growth in this business. Global Specialty continues to deliver outstanding results, with net written premiums up 11%, driven by new business growth and strong renewal written pricing in a number of key lines. Submission flow in the U.S. was up 11% in the quarter, including 15% growth in wholesale, and international saw strong new business growth in marine and Energy. Within renewal written pricing, momentum has been building in the wholesale excess market. Property pricing has been above 20% all year, and international casualty is above 10%. In addition, we remain excited about the ongoing benefits to the top line from our expansive product portfolio. Our underwriting discipline, along with enhanced capabilities developed over the past few years in Global Specialty, are driving targeted market share gains with a stellar Underlying Combined Ratio that has hovered in the mid-80s for the past six quarters. In short, our execution has never been stronger. Turning to pricing, Commercial Lines renewal written pricing was 5.4%, flat with the second quarter. Excluding workers' compensation, renewal written pricing rose to 8%, up 0.4 sequentially, with strong pricing in property, auto, and general liability. Across commercial, property pricing is over 10%, with auto and general liability nearing that level as well. Pricing and other liability and casualty lines also remain strong, while public D&O is still pressured. In workers' compensation, renewal written pricing continues to exceed expectations, remaining slightly positive in the quarter. All in, ex-comp renewal written pricing in Commercial Lines remains on top of loss cost trends, reinforcing my confidence in achieving our margin expectations for the year. In summary, momentum persists in Commercial Lines, where I expect top-line growth at highly profitable margins to continue. Moving to Personal Lines, I am pleased with our continued response to elevated loss costs in both auto and home. In this challenging environment, our focus, objectives, and execution are unwavering. During the quarter, we achieved auto renewal written price increases of nearly 20%, which we expect to continue at that rate into the fourth quarter. Current accident year loss trend expectations for the third quarter, as updated in June, held a promising development as we finish the year. In homeowners, renewal written pricing of 14.1%, comprised of net rate and insured value increases, outpaced underlying loss cost trends. This is the fifth consecutive quarter of double-digit pricing increases in this book. Our focus on the preferred market within Personal Lines business is a competitive advantage with our modern, innovative, and digitally enhanced offering, Prevail. This product will be available in 39 states by the end of this month, and we are optimistic about future prospects for growth. In the fourth quarter, we expect to achieve auto new business rate adequacy in over half the states, representing two-thirds of new business premium. I am confident in the pricing actions we are taking will return this business to targeted profitability in 2025. In Group Benefits, premium growth of 8% and a core earnings margin of 9.8% were both outstanding. Core earnings of $170 million was a quarterly record, reflecting focused execution, improved mortality trends, and continued strong disability results. This quarter's disability loss ratio reflects historically low long-term disability incidence trends and favorable claim recoveries. In Group Life, mortality trends have improved both sequentially and year-over-year, but remain above pre-pandemic levels. Looking at the top line, growth was driven by book persistency above 90%, plus strong year-to-date sales. Overall, the strength of our Group Benefits diversified product portfolio, as well as our commitment to outstanding customer experience through the use of data and technology, resonates in this marketplace, cementing our leadership position. Before I turn the call over to Beth, let me share some takeaways from the recent Council of Insurance Agents and Brokers Annual Conference. Throughout the course of the 60-plus meetings and touch points at CIAB, we heard a consistent acknowledgment of the strength of our franchise. Partners called out our unique digital tools, broad product set, the strength of our innovation agenda, and the consistent execution of our strategy over a number of years. They also expressed their desire to grow their business with us, and they have come to view our team as best-in-class, with relationships that have never been stronger. Confirmation from distribution partners that we are delivering on our strategy is strong validation of our leading position in the market. Through those relationships, combined with enhanced capabilities, state-of-the-art technology, and digital tools, we are taking market share while delivering industry-leading returns. With that track record, I am confident in our ability to consistently deliver core earnings ROEs in the 14%-15% range. Now, I'll turn the call over to Beth to provide more detailed commentary on the quarter. Thank you, Chris. Core earnings for the quarter were $708 million, or $2.29 per diluted share. Commercial lines had a very strong quarter, with core earnings of $542 million and an underlying combined ratio of 87.8. Small commercial continues to deliver excellent results, with premium growth of 9% and an underlying combined ratio of 89.7, which includes some elevated non-cat property losses. This is the 13th consecutive quarter with an underlying combined ratio of below 90. Middle and large commercial delivered another quarter of written premium over $1 billion and an exceptional underlying combined ratio of 88.1. This was a 5.6-point improvement from the prior year, including favorable non-cat property losses and expense ratio improvement. Global Specialties' underlying margin was a strong 84.3, a 20 basis point improvement from a year ago, primarily due to lower loss ratios in Global Reinsurance and international lines, partially offset by higher loss ratios in U.S. financial lines due to public D&O rate pressure and marine, driven by a couple of large losses, as well as higher policyholder dividends in bond due to the strong profitability of the book. In personal lines, core loss for the quarter was $8 million, with an underlying combined ratio of 99. Homeowners' underlying combined ratio of 78.1 was in line with expectations. The auto underlying combined ratio was 108.5 for the quarter, which is consistent with our expectation from second quarter. Importantly, we made no adjustments to loss picks from the first half of the year and prior accident years. As Chris indicated, we continue to pursue rate increases to offset the loss cost trends we are experiencing. Written premium and personal lines increased 8% over the prior year, driven by steady and successful rate actions. In auto, we achieved written pricing increases of 19.7% and earned pricing increases of 11.7%. In homeowners, pricing increases were 14.1% on a written basis and 13.7% on earned. The expense ratio improved by 2.9 points, primarily driven by lower marketing spend. With respect to cats, P&C current accident year catastrophe were $184 million before tax, which compares to catastrophe losses of $293 million in the prior year quarter, which included Hurricane Ian losses of $214 million. Although cat losses were elevated for the industry again this quarter, our results were in line with our expectations, as we believe that our effective aggregation, management, and underwriting discipline has helped to limit our losses from the increased number of convective storms. Total net favorable prior accident year development was $43 million, with $46 million in commercial lines, as reserve reductions in workers' compensation and package businesses were modestly offset by reserve increases in general liability. Moving to group benefits, core earnings in the third quarter were $170 million, with a core earnings margin of 9.8%, reflecting strong premium growth and long-term disability results. Group disability continues to deliver strong results, with a loss ratio of 67.3 for the quarter, down 1.1 points from prior year. The group life loss ratio of 80.2 improved 2.9 points versus prior year, reflecting an improving mortality trend. The expense ratio improved 1.4 points and reflects strong top-line performance and expense efficiencies, somewhat offset by continued investments to meet our customers' evolving needs and drive greater efficiency. Fully insured ongoing sales in the quarter of $143 million contributed to a year-to-date sales total of $768 million. This, combined with excellent persistency at above 90%, resulted in fully insured ongoing premium growth of 8% for the third quarter.... Our diversified investment portfolio produced strong results. For the quarter, net investment income was $597 million. Our fixed income portfolio is continuing to benefit from higher interest rates, and we continue to be pleased with the positive 150 basis point differential between our reinvestment rate and the yield on sales and maturities. The total annualized portfolio yield, excluding limited partnerships, was 4.1% before tax, slightly higher than the second quarter. We expect the full yield, excluding LPs, will be about 80 basis points higher than the prior year. Looking forward to 2024, we anticipate another 25 basis points of improvement based on the current yield curve, which will contribute to about a $200 million before tax increase in investment income, excluding LPs. Our annualized LP returns were 6.3% in the quarter. Results during the first 9 months of 2023 reflect the resiliency of our private equity returns and the absence of any real estate equity sales. The overall credit quality of the portfolio remains high, with an average credit rating of A+. Fixed maturity valuation decreased as a result of higher interest rates. Net credit losses, including intent to sell impairments, remain insignificant, along with an increase of $5 million in the allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio. All of our mortgage loans continue to be current with respect to interest and principal payments. Turning to capital management, during the quarter, we repurchased 4.8 million shares under our share repurchase program for $350 million, and we expect to remain at that level of repurchases in the fourth quarter. We were also pleased to announce yesterday an 11% increase in our common quarterly dividend payable on January third. This is the 10th increase in the dividend in the last decade and another proof point of the consistent capital generation of the company. Our third quarter results demonstrate that our franchise continues to deliver consistent, sustained, industry-leading results. We believe that we have the strategies, talent, and technology in place to continue to succeed. I will now turn the call back to Susan. Thank you, Beth. We have about 30 minutes for questions. Operator, we will now take our first question. Thank you. And as a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, press Star and then the number one on your telephone keypad. To be able to take as many of your questions as possible, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. And we will take our first question from Brian Meredith with UBS. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. Chris, Beth, a couple of questions here. First one, I just wanted to dig in a little bit on the commercial lines premium growth. I was a little surprised at the slowdown we saw in the middle markets premium growth, considering what some other companies have been reporting this quarter. Then the small commercial side, I know you had a difficult comp there, but also a slowdown. Maybe we can unpack that a little bit, and anything unusual going on? Brian, thanks, you know, for the question. I think, just the context, you know, here, just if you really look at sort of year-to-date results, just on, you know, written premium in small, up, you know, 10.3%, middle, 8.8%. You know, new sales in small, 21%, middle, you know, 12%. So, those are results, you know, we're really proud of and, you know, pleased with, particularly at the highly profitable, you know, margins that, that they're producing. I would say, you know, the second quarter, you know, there's two main themes that, you know, we discussed as a management team, and I'll let Mo add his color, is, you know, we're remaining disciplined on, on price, and underwriting, and if we're not going to get the, you know, the terms and conditions that, we expect, we'll let the business go. And I think that happened more times than not, you know, in particularly the July time period. And then I would say that, you know, the, the overall, exposure growth is still positive, but it is moderating, you know, evidenced by, you know, lower audit, you know, premiums, on a sequential, you know, first half of the year basis. So again, still positive exposure growth, but not as robust as it was early in the year. But Mo, what would you add? Yeah, Brian, I would say that, just to reiterate, we feel really good about the year-to-date growth of the 12% on new, but as you see in the quarters can be lumpy. And maybe a little bit of context there. We equip our underwriters with tools by product, by specialty area, and then they are in the market executing on those. And sometimes, in some quarters, we do, and especially periodically see months where the market's just going further than we would go. So I feel like our underwriters made really good decisions in the quarter, and you especially see those months at the beginning of a quarter when the market really heats up a little bit periodically. But broadly, I think the underwriting team did a nice job. And right now, these months are more of an exception, but we're watching that closely. Great. That's helpful. Thank you. And then, Chris, the second question, I know we've chatted about this before on conference calls, but, you know, a fairly large TPA out there talked about medical cost inflation and workers' comp of 7%-9% is what they're seeing in their business right now. Is that what you're seeing? I don't believe that was the case. And how would that kind of play into your comp results? Yeah. Yeah, happy to, you know, sort of comment on that, but there's not gonna be anything new I'm gonna share with you. I think, again, in the context that, you know, our workers' comp is a highly profitable line of business. You know, we haven't made any changes to frequency or medical assumptions since we set them at the beginning of this year, so things are actually running almost exactly as you know, we predicted. You know, medical severity, as we've talked about it, what we price for and collect and put up on the balance sheet is 5%. Actually, what's emerging, you know, for the first nine months is slightly less than that, in the 2%-3% range. I would say, though, that, you know, if I look at trends, you know, last year, 9 months, this year, 9 months, medical severity is probably up a little bit, you know, say, up a point. But I don't think there's any trend to call out other than just sort of maybe normal volatility. We watch all our components of price, whether it be hospital stays, whether it be physicians, whether it be, you know, pharmaceuticals, and, you know, generally, things are behaving as we expect. So, I don't know what to tell you other than, it's steady as she goes, you know, from our perspective as we sit here today. I think the impact, you know, on the longer term is still to play out, but as we've talked about before, Brian, I mean, our claims team is world-class. We have fee schedules in place, networks in place that sort of provide a buffer. And if long term, you know, things continue to be elevated, you know, the reaction function within our system, I think will allow us to raise prices and deal with it appropriately. So I don't think we're gonna get surprised in any way, shape, or form on medical severity running away from us. Yeah, I would expect your loss control probably helps you relative to the industry as well, right? Yeah. Yeah, clearly, you know, we got a lot of capabilities embedded in claim, embedded in our engineering group, so, yeah, I. And again, being the second-largest writer, you would expect us to have those capabilities. Yeah. Thank you. Real helpful. We will take our next question from Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Hi, thanks. Good morning. I wanted first to start with your response to Brian's first question. You guys said that, you know, you just saw some competitive, some competitive forces in July, and it sounds like that corrected over the rest of the quarter. I want to confirm that, but then can you give us a sense of what lines, I guess, specifically within the middle market you're, you were seeing folks become more competitive in July? Elise, I might have Mo comment on that. Yeah, Elise, I would just say that July was the month we felt it the most, and then it was on the larger end. I won't get into the specific areas. I would just put the larger account segment is really where we felt the most competition during the month. Okay. And then, you know, with the reserve development in the quarter, you know, I saw, you know, total favorable development was driven by comp. There was a little bit of adverse development in in GL. Anything, anything you want to highlight there? Any specific years or anything you guys are seeing, I know is a small number, but just looking for some color there. Yeah, Elise, it's Beth. Nothing in particular I'd call out. You know, a couple of large losses that we saw on Umbrella and one large national account that spread over several years. So, you know, again, as you pointed out, relatively small impact in the quarter and nothing that's indicative of a new trend or anything like that. We will take our next question from Mike Ward with Citi. Your line is open. Thanks, guys. Good morning. I was wondering, just with the growth in property, how should we think about your non-cat property volatility going forward? And, like, has the range of outcomes on your underlying loss ratio widened or changed materially? Mike, thanks for the question. As I said in my prepared remarks, I mean, we're trending toward $2.5 billion of commercial, you know, property premium across our, our businesses, which would be about a 25%, you know, increase from prior year. And we feel, you know, very good about, you know, how we're, you know, executing, both from a growth and pricing side. I'll give you just a couple numbers for, you know, the third quarter here. In our Spectrum property component, our growth was 13%, and pricing at 11.5% up. In our, you know, general, property in middle market, you know, growth was 13%, and pricing was up, twelve point nine percent. Large property grew 16%, with pricing up 16% also. So I think in total, we're executing very well. We grew property 12% this quarter, with pricing up 14%. And as I, you know, said before, I mean, this isn't a cat strategy. I mean, you know, we'll obviously take on a little cat, but we're looking at all the perils, particularly the fire, to build a national book of more property exposure. And I think we're getting paid for that incremental volatility from quarter to quarter. I would say the story line this quarter, particularly with non-cat commercial property losses, they were in total at expectations, and about a point better than prior year, with elevated losses in small commercial, offset by lower losses expected in middle and large. So, I think our strategy is well, and well, I don't know if you would add anything as far as, you know, the execution or any color from the marketplace- Yeah, no- But I'm overall pleased. Yeah, we just continue to build a talent base. We're attracting people just based on how we're going about going after property. The tool set continues to improve, and we're talking retail and wholesale here. We're continuing to see an opportunity, rates generally hanging in there, terms and conditions are hanging in there, deductibles are improving. So I think broadly, we feel really optimistic about our ability to continue to chase the market. Stephanie, what would you add in small commercial property, and any E&S color? Yeah, I think you framed it well from the spectrum perspective, is that, you know, we have experienced some volatility. As you referenced, we've taken rate, not just recently, over many years, to stay at or ahead of loss trend for the property portion of our BOP product. As Chris stated, you know, it's double digits in terms of what we accomplished in the third quarter, which is higher than our longer-term property trends. I will remind everybody that we did have our thirteenth quarter in a row with an underlying combined in the under 90. From an E&S perspective, E&S binding, which continues to be a growing and profitable portion of our book of business, you know, strong risk selection, you know, achievement of 30 points of property rate in the quarter and growing. All in, really proud of how the team's execution. Awesome. Thank you, guys. Maybe on personal lines real quick and the seasonality, just wondering, should we expect a typical pressure in Q4 or do you think the rate that you're, that you're pushing could actually maybe mute that seasonality? Yeah. So, I'll take that, and this is Beth. In personal lines, and if we break it out between auto and home, in auto, we'd expect fourth quarter to be higher than what we've seen year to date, and probably in that sort of 6-8-point range. Where it comes out will really be impacted by just where loss trend goes. On the other hand, home, typically, fourth quarter is more favorable than the year to date, usually by 5-6 points. And we'd be expecting that again this quarter. Thanks, guys. We will take our next question from Alex Scott with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Hi, good morning. First one I had for you is just a follow-up on the workers' comp. You know, I hear you on how you feel about the profitability of the business, and, you know, certainly the reserve development has been great. I guess, just helping us think through, you know, the NCCI sort of indications are pointing down another mid-single digits, and, you know, you mentioned, I think, the 5% loss cost trend. So how should we think about, you know, the margin drag that that creates going into next year? I mean, can you help us think through, like, even just relative to the headwind that you got from that this year, does it get worse? I mean, there's also sort of a moving target in terms of the baseline that you sort of start off with when you do that math. So I just—any help would be great. Alex, I hate to disappoint you, but we're not going to talk about next year, you know, at this point. We'll, you know, we'll talk about next year once we finish this year and what we see. But you're right. I mean, you know, there is going to be continued, you know, pressure coming, you know, from pricing, but I think the setup is going to be very similar to this year. As much as there's pricing pressure, frequencies will, I believe, continue to improve. We'll pick our same medical severity, most likely in that 5% range, but knowing that it's performing, you know, better. We've been able to out execute on our rate plan, you know, this year, which is providing a modest, you know, benefit. So there's always, you know, the opportunity to, you know, to outperform a rate plan in spite of what, you know, the NCCI is putting out. And again, you still put all the, you know, the math and the mechanics, you know, together, it's still going to be a profitable line of business, for us in the industry. And, I think it's very manageable, you know, from our point of view, at least heading into 2024. Got it. The second question I had for you is just on the ROE range you all talk about. I mean, you're, you're sort of hitting the upper end of it right now, and, you know, personal lines isn't making money right now, and with the rate you're taking it, it should start to again. And then investment income, you talked about, you know, being a bigger contributor next year. So when I, when I think through all that, I, you know, I hear the ROE guide, and I, and I'm sure, look, you're not going to adjust your long-term targets. There's going to be periods that you're earning more or less than the target, potentially. But is that the right way to think about it, that that is a longer-term ROE guide, and that, you know, you're not suggesting that there's some offset to those things necessarily, and that, you know, we may go through a period where you're over the top end of it? I think you got it right. You know, we've said about our franchise, we're becoming more consistent, more predictable in all our businesses. You know, whether it be property and casualty, whether it be group benefits, you know, personal lines is going through a tough slog, but we do see a return to, you know, profitability in 2025 there. So yeah, the range is the range. You know, we've added the word consistently to that, you know, range. It's not a limit, you know, we'll try to overachieve and, you know, outperform, you know, that. But I think that is, you know, that 15 is particularly a good anchor point, plus or minus. You know, we're gonna always, you know, try hard to outperform and, you know, do our, you know, very best. You know, we are, you know, sensitive just to a little bit of rate fatigue that may or may not be happening in the marketplace with customers, and agents, and brokers. I think we've educated people well enough over the years, you know, Alex, at least from our, you know, perspective on the components of loss cost trends, and, you know, why we need to continue to be disciplined, you know, with rate, whether it be commercial auto, whether it be property, whether it be GL, you know, with all the factors that have been discussed by many over a long period of time. So, I think that still puts the industry in a conducive place, you know, particularly as we head into 2024, with particularly a rising yield environment and investment returns, you know, coming through the portfolio. So yeah, you put it all together, and I still think that's a good range, but it's not a limit for us to try to outperform. Got it. Thank you. We will take our next question from Greg Peters with Raymond James. Your line is open. Good morning. I'm gonna pivot to the group benefits business. If I look at, you know, page 21 of your supplement, a nice step up in ROE over the last several quarters. Can you remind us of what kind of economic sensitivity that business has? Because there's obviously some noise in the marketplace about what the economy might look like next year. And then secondly, when I look at the results, and particularly in the third quarter, wondering if there's anything you want to call out, unusual good guys that helped that boost the number higher? Thanks. Greg, I'll start, and then I'll ask Jonathan to add his commentary. Yeah, you're right, you know, to point out the 13.8% ROE, very proud of that. Obviously, mortality is trending back, you know, to normal, which is providing a tailwind. I would say, though, you know, mortality on a year-to-date basis is still maybe slightly ahead of our expectations, but again, trending in the right way. And we've talked about it for a while, that we're trying to put additional rate into that life insurance book, and the team, I think, is executing, you know, well in the marketplace. The other thing I just always like to convert is that 13.8 GAAP ROE probably translates into a 17% tangible ROE on a tangible basis, just given some of the goodwill that, you know, we've added with acquisitions over the years. So on a tangible basis, it is a meaningful contributor. Earnings power is getting back to what I think would be somewhat normal. You know, the investment performance will contribute. So I think it's a stellar business for us. It's one of the industry leaders. It's growing, you know, nicely in conjunction generally with economic conditions, whether it be employment, payroll gains, you know, the disability claims function in, that we have is, I think, world-class. You know, we've added new capabilities, you know, with our voluntary product suite and the number of paid family leave, you know, components. I could go on and on because I think it's a valuable business that people should look at maybe a little differently than it's valued today. But, Jonathan, what would you add from an overall performance side and a trend? That is a terrific overview, Chris. So a lot of agreement with all of that. I think, Greg, you asked a bit about some of the economic drivers, and that often gets ascribed to the LTD line and linked with employment levels. Obviously, right now, unemployment at very low levels. Certainly, that is contributing, we think, to some of the performance of the business. The outlook right now around unemployment, not something that we see as being a real negative drag into the future. Even if levels were to increase, there's always a bit of a delay between when we see that and if there is going to be any effect on LTD. But even that effect, we would say, is pretty loose in terms of its linkage. It's not a hard connection, and we think that, even if unemployment levels were to increase moderately, we're probably still operating at, attractive levels. So things seem to be in good shape on the LTD side. Your other point about in the third quarter, you know, as Chris outlined, solid net investment income, pleased with that result. The mortality is probably one of the more notable things for us. We've had sequential improvement over the last four quarters. That's been terrific on mortality. But, this quarter, we got down to a level that we think of as being more in line with, endemic state, post-pandemic, and so we're pleased to see that. We'll watch that one again in the fourth quarter, but that bodes well for the business moving forward. And then on the disability side, LTD, again, you know, incidence levels pretty attractive at this moment, and our claim team just doing a phenomenal job around recovery. So we think our expertise there is really coming through. You know, one of the things about The Hartford is we understand medical management. Whether that's comp or LTD, and we think that comes through in our execution on both sides of the organization. So, really pleased with that outcome. Where that trends in the future, I think, you know, we'll continue to monitor and obviously adapt ourselves quickly, as necessary, but we're pretty pleased with the performance of the business year to date. That makes sense. Thanks for the detail on that. I guess as my follow-up, I'll pivot to the personal lines business. What I was interested in is that if I look at your prior accident year development table, you know, where we're seeing other companies report adverse development inside personal lines, we're not really seeing it at The Hartford. So maybe you could spend a minute and just talk to us about why your trends are maybe a little bit different from some of the others that are reporting problems, in terms of reserve development, that is. Yeah. So I'll start. So first of all, in Q3, as we said in our remarks, we did not make any adjustments to prior accident years for the auto line, for you know, auto liability or auto physical damage. I'll remind you, if you go back to the first half of the year, in the first quarter, we did record about $20 million related to physical damage for the 2022 year. And also in the first quarter and second quarter, we increased our estimates for auto liability for the 2022 year, but those were offset by releases for years 2021 and prior. So that's why that development on a net basis is not showing up in that table. So we were experiencing some of the same trends that others were seeing. We reacted to them. As I said, we were very pleased that in the third quarter, our loss picks for prior accident years, as well as the first half of the year, did remain unchanged. The last thing that I'll just point out on that, because I know some have looked at sort of our year-over-year results in auto. I'll just remind you that because we have booked prior year development for the 2022 year in 2023, when you look at that third quarter reported underlying loss ratio for auto, it would probably be about 4-5 points higher, reflecting some of that PYD we've seen. Hopefully, that helps some people who are looking at sort of that year-over-year comparison and that underlying auto ratio. Thank you very much for that detail. We will take our next question from Josh Shanker with Bank of America. Your line is open. Yeah, thank you very much. I'm looking at all this auto stuff. You know, one thing that was a big change I noticed that GEICO really improved a lot in their margins, and at the same time, they churned a significant portion of their book of business. One of the things that you were looking for to improve profitability long term in the AARP business was the opportunity to nonrenew customers who shouldn't be renewed. To what extent do you think there's a solution in your profitability, a combination of nonrenewing customers as opposed to achieving through rate alone? Josh, it's Chris. I'll start, and then I'll ask Stephanie to add her color. Again, we're very proud of, you know, the AARP relationship for over the last, you know, 35 years. I think, you will recall, you know, we did renew a contract and extended it to 2033. Part of that, then, we launched the Prevail product and platform. But the in-force business, both auto and home, it does have lifetime continuity agreements still on the policy that prohibits us from just canceling, you know, a customer unless their risk profile, particularly in the homeowner's line, you know, really changed. That's different with Prevail, but that's going to take some time to sort of work its way all into the, you know, the in-force business, because 90% of the business that, you know, we still have on the books, it relates to lifetime continuity agreements. So we have to be sensitive there. That's why we're, we're pushing, you know, for rate as aggressively as, as we've had. And I think Stephanie and the team, the numbers and the results, you know, speak for themselves, and, and that will begin to, you know, to, to earn in. But Stephanie, what would you add? Yeah, I think you framed it really well, Chris. You know, when you think about really where our focus, Josh, is, responding to the loss trend environment, you see that materializing in our rate actions. We're also deploying our Prevail products, 39 states and market, as of today. About 50% of our new written premium is on the Prevail product, but that is a very small portion of our in-force. So just to go back to underscore Chris's comment on the overall in-force, the lion's share of that does have the lifetime continuation endorsement. And then the preponderance of our in-force book being 12-month policies, you know, takes time for that rate to earn in, but wholly focused on bringing this book back to profitability. When we look at that new business, is the rate increases similar between what's going through on the Prevail book and what's going on the lifetime continuity book? Yeah, absolutely. What I would share with you is that, on the in-force book, you know, you see the written rate. The rate has to end, earn in. But as we've shared in previous calls, we also look at new business rate adequacy. So when, you know, what is the rate level of new business? And we expect, based on all of our actions, that more than half of our states by this year, by year end, will be new business rate adequate, and that makes up about 65% of our new business volume. And so again, that gives us a degree of confidence in terms of continuing to market to drive in new. So you have to think about new business being rate adequate, given all of our rate actions, and then on the in-force, that book is going to earn in that rate over time. Thank you for the details. Appreciate it. We will take our next question from Michael Zaremski with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open. Hi, good morning. This is Jack on from Mike. Just one question on the commercial insurance competitive environment. Excluding workers' comp, are you surprised at all that commercial pricing has continued to increase? Any thoughts on how we should think about pricing into 2024, once higher reinsurance costs are through the system, and we're seeing some declines in certain core CPI gauges? Yeah, Jack, thanks for the question. I'll start, and I'll have Mo add. No, I don't think there's any surprise. I thought I tried to address it, that just given the environment, I think the continuation of, you know, rate, you know, being disciplined, you know, reinsurance costs, probably increasing, all point to, you know, there's need to be disciplined on rate and work with our distribution partners and customers to make sure they understand, you know, why, you know, so that there can be an element of explanation back to the end customer. So I see more of the same as we head into 2024 at this point in time. But Mo, what would you add on the commercial side? Yeah, no, I would say that the reinsurance market feels fairly stable, fairly predictable, so and I think that's getting priced in ahead of renewal dates. I would say second, the rate environment is still pretty conducive. We think it's constructive, and we think that will continue. And then third, again, I talked before about we have months periodically where we just think the market's competitive. It just is lumpy that way. And, you know, oddly, right now, October's feeling really good, and so it just things bounce around a little bit, and that's just, w e're going to be really disciplined about it, but we're looking to grow in a really responsible fashion. Thank you. We will take our next question from Tracy Benguigui with Barclays. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning. There is a big debate on what is the best definition of pricing. Is it pure rate or exposure that acts like rate? Your 19.7% pricing increase for personal auto is a great achievement. I'm not really hearing that pricing level from your peers. So just to get grounded, are you including exposure in there? And if you are, how does auto exposure act like rate? You know, Tracy, I would add some commentary and then ask Stephanie. But my commentary is going to be more on commercial, just so you have that. It's somewhat unique in personal lines, auto. Home, we talk about, you know, the rate that we're achieving both includes pure rate and ITV, which, you know, we think works in tandem. But I think we disclosed, I know I talked about it in my prepared remarks, ex-comp, our renewal written pricing was 8% in the quarter, up four tenths. And I would say the component of exposure that acts like rate there, yeah, I think you could think of it as basically 2, 2.5 points, 2.6 points, to be precise, or one-third exposure, and then two-thirds sort of, you know, net rate. That's on commercial. I would ask Stephanie to explain to you the auto. Hi, Tracy. You know, I think about personal auto as largely the rate, and I appreciate your comments. Really, our results that we were able to realize in from a rate perspective is largely driven by the loss results are evident, and they're fully supportable in our filings. We have strong relationships with the regulators, and then it was just truly outstanding execution by the team. But if I take you over to homeowners, you know, how Chris described it, that is a combination of both rate and then what we're seeing in terms of the inflationary factors. And you bring those two together, and that gave us the 14.1. Okay. Yes, but it was more on personal auto, but I appreciate that. In group benefits, specifically disability, could you see yourself being more competitive in pricing at 11 renewals, given what you said, historically low long-term disability incidents, trends, and favorable claims recovery? I'm going to have Jonathan, you know, add to his commentary, but the market's pretty competitive and pretty efficient, so I don't think we have to make a conscious decision to be more competitive on price. We have our targets. Obviously, we'll reflect, you know, new disability trends, both incidents and terminations, you know, for that cohort. We do expect a reversion to the mean there, Tracy, so that'll put some upward, you know, pressure on pricing just from, you know, where we are today. But I wouldn't say there's a conscious mindset at 1/1/24 to do anything different than we've been doing in the past. But Jonathan, what would you say? I would agree with that, Chris. I think that's the outlook that we bring to the market. You know, we can talk about when we, you know, look forward into 2024, we find the market to be competitive all the time. I don't feel as though there's any particular change in the nature of competition in the market. And for us, you know, a fair portion of our book is upmarket, larger accounts, and there's credibility in the data, often by account there. And so we're looking at those trends on an account-specific basis and have been doing that, continue to do that. That's the way we compete in the marketplace. And so I think that, you know, we factor all of this insight into those selections. I don't think there's any particular change, and if the underlying question is: is this a moment to drop pricing and to grow aggressively? That's not the outlook that Hartford brings really in any of its lines of business. The discipline is there, it remains there, and our efforts are to continue to grow the book profitably and make sure that we take care of our clients in a world-class fashion. Thanks. You, you did mention reversion to the mean. If you had a crystal ball, when will you see that happening? We'll tell you when we get there, Tracy. Okay. I mean, you know, we price for a reversion. Obviously, we hope it's somewhat different, you know, given just the economic conditions. But, I don't know when the realized reversion to the mean will actually happen, but we've got to be prepared for it. Thank you. Yeah, I think, I think that's a fair summary, Chris. And our pricing methodology includes a multiyear view of trend, and I think in that, Chris, as we're thinking about it, we see that incidence levels are likely to be increasing over time. But I think that horizon is always something that we're working on and debating here ourselves and thinking about the right way to position ourselves in the market from a pricing standpoint. We will take our final question from Yaron Kinar with Jefferies. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning. I want to go back to some of the reserve commentary earlier on the call. Can you maybe talk a little more about accident years 16 through 19? I think a lot of investors are honed in on those years specifically, and what you're seeing there for lines like GL and like the financial lines as well. Yeah, I mean, as it relates to the quarter, as I said, we've, you know, very small amount of, of relative increases. I think if you go back and look at over the last several quarters, you've seen us take some, you know, increases in, in GL lines, and I'd say, you know, a lot of that has been in those years that you are indicating. And we take that experience into consideration as we think about our loss picks and pricing for those lines going forward. So I don't really have much more color to add to that, Yaron, unless there's something else specific you were looking at. Well, I guess, and maybe this is becoming a little too granular for a call, and I apologize if so. I'm just trying to hone in on specifically those years and understand maybe the, the net numbers that you're talking about are actually, you know, a larger gross loss from those years, offset by maybe some favorability from other years. Yeah, I mean, there can be some back and forth. I wouldn't call out anything significant on that. I mean, on our more current years, you know, especially on lines like GL, we do tend to hold our loss picks longer. You know, we definitely, you know, through several quarters, had seen some improvement that we recognized on the 2020 year, but again, nothing that significance that I would call out. Okay. And then the other question I had was on the Navigators' book. So I think at the time of the acquisition, the U.S. casualty book was about 40% of the business. What does that come to as of today, either premium-wise or, or as a percentage of, of the overall specialty book? I'm going to disappoint you. I don't, I don't have those numbers in front of me, and I'm not going to try to guess. We'll just work through Susan to get you that number, if that's important to you. Great, I appreciate it. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that is all the time we have for questions. I will now turn the call back to Ms. Susan Spivak for closing remarks. Thank you, Abby. Just want to thank everyone for joining us today, and as always, please reach out with additional questions. If we didn't get to your question, I'm available this afternoon and look forward to speaking with you then. Have a great day. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's call, and we thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.