Good day, welcome! I would now like to turn the call over to Richard Putnam for HealthEquity's earnings call. Please go ahead. Thank you, Sarah. Hello, everyone. Welcome to HealthEquity's first quarter of fiscal year 2024 earnings conference call. My name is Richard Putnam, Investor Relations for HealthEquity. Joining me today on the call is Jon Kessler, President and CEO, Dr. Steve Neeleman, Vice Chair and Founder of the company, and Tyson Murdock, the company's Executive Vice President and CFO. Before I turn the call over to Jon, I have two important reminders. First, a press release announcing the financial results of our first quarter of fiscal 2024 was issued after the market closed this afternoon. These financial results included contributions from our wholly owned subsidiaries and accounts they administer. The press release also includes definitions of certain non-GAAP financial measures that we will reference today. A copy of today's press release, including reconciliations of these non-GAAP measures with comparable GAAP measures and a recording of this webcast, can be found on our investor relations website, which is ir.healthequity.com. Second, our comments and responses to your questions today reflect management's view as of today, June 5th, 2023, and will contain forward-looking statements as defined by the SEC, including predictions, expectations, estimates, or other information that might be considered forward-looking. There are many important factors relating to our business, which could affect the forward-looking statements made today. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the statements made here today. We caution against placing undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We also encourage you to review the discussion of these factors and other risks that may affect our future results or the market price of our stock, as detailed in our annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent periodic reports filed with the SEC. We assume no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements in light of new information or future events. At the conclusion of our prepared remarks, we will open up the call for Q&A with the help of our operator, Sarah. One final announcement before we hear from Jon. Due to some conflicts recently encountered, we are postponing our Investor Day that was planned for July 11th to be at a later to be announced date. Once we've rescheduled the date, we will provide you with a press release and invitations. Now, over to Jon. I mean, you're going to return your cabana wear or... No comment? No comment. All right. Hi, everyone, and thank you for joining us for a healthy start to fiscal 2024. I will discuss Q1 key metrics and our view on performance, and Tyson will detail Q1 results as well as our raised guidance for the fiscal year, and Steve is here for Q&A. In Q1, the team delivered double-digit year-over-year growth in revenue, which was +19%, Adjusted EBITDA, which was +48%, and HSA assets, which were +10%. HSA members grew 9%, total accounts grew 4%, muted by the previously discussed change in COBRA methodology. HealthEquity ended Q1 with 15 million total accounts, 8 million HSAs, and $22 billion in HSA assets, all kind of round numbers, and 10% more of our HSA members became investors year over year. Invested assets grew 12% despite a dicey market. Team Purple started the selling year off strong, with 134,000 new HSAs opened during the quarter. That's down 25,000 year-over-year. We expected a drop, given the comp to last Q1's blistering job growth and turnover rates economy-wide. We're particularly pleased, actually, that that was nearly offset by new employer adds, including across the board for HSAs. In addition, at this time last year, we saw transfers of HSAs from banks that were exiting the business. Obviously, this year, in given the competition for cash, we did not see that same activity. Enterprise logo wins that will onboard later in the year were up noticeably year-over-year, driven by an expanded network partner footprint and employers seeking win-wins in anticipation of a tough calendar 2024 benefits renewal. For the full year, we are increasingly confident that increased HSA adoption at the employer level will help to offset lower macro job growth. Q1 saw some daylight on CDB growth. Our CDB members grew accounts in the quarter by, excluding COBRA as a whole, by 4%, and by 1% if you simply exclude the aforementioned adjustment to a COBRA accounting methodology. Health CDBs, FSAs, and HRAs were strong as the onboarding of significant new logos offset some seasonal runoffs. Commuter maintained its slow rebound. Extra ACA exchange subsidies continued to negatively impact COBRA uptake and therefore, activity fees. To compensate for that, the team has begun raising fixed fees with good early success, which is very much needed. While there's much wood to chop on service fees, service costs actually fell by 40 basis points year-over-year, even as revenue increased, despite wage gains for our team members, as we benefited from a much calmer service environment versus a year ago quarter. We discussed last quarter, rapid improvement in service tech continues to drive more interactions to chat and automated responses. We believe there is more to come of this over the longer term. Q1 also provided a preview of what we believe is to come over the longer term with respect to custodial fylds, as fylds is fees plus yields, that'd be fylds. Good luck with that, transcriber. Yields on our laddered bank deposit portfolio rose out of the COVID depths, and more members choose Enhanced Rates for their HSA cash. We saw the strength of our model over the course of the quarter, as we talked about in March. High short-term rates provided a boost to income on CDB client health funds as well. All of this added up to strong and resilient cash flow from operations, which, as Tyson will detail, led to a return to GAAP profitability in Q1, allowed management to reduce outstanding balance on HealthEquity's variable rate, term loan, and debt, and enabled us to continue to invest in future growth and innovation. Mr. Murdock will now detail the financial results and outlook. Thank you, Jon Kessler. I will highlight our first quarter GAAP and non-GAAP financial results. A reconciliation of GAAP measures to non-GAAP measures is found in today's press release. First quarter revenue increased 19% year-over-year. Service revenue was $105.1 million, up 1% year-over-year. Custodial revenue grew 59% to $94.4 million in the first quarter. The annualized interest rate yield on HSA cash was 232 basis points. Interchange revenue grew 7% to $44.9 million. Gross margin was 60% in the first quarter of this year versus 54% in the year-ago period. Net income for the first quarter was $4.1 million, or $0.05 per share on a GAAP EPS basis. Our non-GAAP net income was $42.8 million for the first quarter, and non-GAAP net income per share was $0.50 per share, compared to $0.27 per share last year. While higher interest rates increased custodial yields and generated interest income, they also increased the rate of interest we pay on the remaining $287 million Term Loan A, to a stated rate of 6.6%. Adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was $86.6 million, and Adjusted EBITDA margin was 35%, a more than 700 basis point improvement over last year. Turning to the balance sheet. As of April 30, 2023, we used $54 million of cash to reduce our outstanding variable debt, resulting in a quarter-end balance of $226 million of cash and cash equivalents, with $873 million of debt outstanding, net of issuance costs. We continue to have an undrawn $1 billion line of credit available. For fiscal 2024, we're raising guidance and now expect the following: revenue in a range between $975 million and $985 million. GAAP net income to be in a range of $9 million to $14 million. We expect non-GAAP net income to be between $164 billion and $171 billion, resulting in non-GAAP diluted net income between $1.88 and $1.97 per share, based upon an estimated 87 million shares outstanding for the year. We expect Adjusted EBITDA to be between $333 million and $343 million. As Jon mentioned, we are basing fiscal 2024 interest rate assumptions embedded in guidance on forward-looking market indicators, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate and mid-duration Treasury forward curves and Fed Fund futures. We are raising the expected average yield on HSA cash to approximately 235 basis points for fiscal 2024, while the average credit rating HSA rates on HSA members receive on HSA cash remain flat sequentially. We continue to bake in a 20 basis point increase by the end of fiscal 2024. As a reminder, the crediting rate our HSA members receive are determined in accordance with the formula in our custodial agreements with them. Our guidance also reflects the expectation of higher average interest rates on HealthEquity's variable rate debt versus last year, partially offset by the reduced amount of variable rate debt outstanding. Our guidance includes a smoother seasonal cadence of revenue and earnings, which were disrupted last year by heavier first half service costs as we exited the pandemic, and also the rapidly rising rate environment that benefited last year's second half disproportionately. We expect that interchange revenue seasonally will be more normalized this year, and as suggested earlier, a relatively stable interest rate environment over the remainder of this year. We assume a projected statutory income tax rate of approximately 25% and a diluted share count of 87 million, which now includes common share equivalents as we anticipate positive GAAP net income this year. Moving to positive GAAP net income is going to impact our GAAP tax rate strangely this year. As you know, because of the impact of discrete tax items, the calculated tax rate on a low level of pre-tax income can look squirrely, such as Q1's calculated 59% tax rate. Based on our current full year guidance, we expect roughly a 50% GAAP tax rate for fiscal 2024. As we've done in recent reporting periods, our full fiscal 2024 guidance includes a reconciliation of GAAP to the non-GAAP metrics provided in the earnings release, and a definition of all such items is included at the end of the earnings release. In addition, while the amortization of acquired intangible assets is being excluded from non-GAAP net income, the revenue generated from those acquired intangible assets is not excluded. With that, we know you'll have a number of questions, so let's go right to our operator for Q&A instructions. Thank you. Thank you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question, you may press * then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press * then two. At this time, we will pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question comes from Glen Santangelo with Jefferies. Please go ahead. Oh, yeah, thanks. Good evening. Thanks for taking the question. Hey, Tyson Murdock, I just had a couple of quick financial questions, if I could, just to sort of help us sort of model this thing more correctly. You know, it says now that you have total HSA assets of $14.1 billion. Could you give us a sense for how much of that sits in variable and maybe how much of it you're investing in? Is it still a third, a third, a third? Is that the right way to think about it? You know, the reason I ask is because, you know, we're trying to assess not only this year, but next year, I know you don't want to comment on fiscal 2025, but at the current yield curve, it sort of looks like the yield would be even, you know, up much more year over year in 2025 versus 2024. I just want to, you know if I'm thinking about that math correctly, and I'll stop there. Thanks. Yeah, good question. The variable interest rate portion, of course, is getting smaller with the enhanced rate push. We don't need as much of that, so there's not as much impact. Another thing to consider is the fact that the, obviously, the rates last year accelerated so substantially over the course of the year, that the second half, you know, was impacted by that on that variable component. People got very concerned about, well, how much is that variable component? Based on the size of that amount, it's not very big, and it's going to be obviously more consistent, even though you may see a curve that sort of curves down. That's kind of one area. The next is, you know, a question that we get. You know, when you think about how the assets run through the model, again, they get more consistent as we move into Enhanced Rates, and that has its own liquidity factors. You're thinking about the FDIC portion, which, of course, is lumpy because of the M&A that's occurred over all those years. Think back about the WageWorks acquisition, the Further acquisition and those type of things. The fact that as we go through integration processes on those, we place those assets into five-year contracts, they have to sit in those five-year contracts for five years. Yeah. Then, that causes, when you look back over time, you probably get a smaller amount that rolls off, you know, in this next year than you might think when you think about maybe what you mentioned, which is the third, a third, a third, based on sort of the three-year duration you might get off of those five-year placements. What I'm telling you is that the number is, you know, smaller than that third. You have to go back quite a, you know, back in time, you know, even prior to acquisition, to determine sort of what that or prior to those big acquisitions to look at what that looks like. It will be a smaller number. Jon, I don't know if you want to make any additional comments to that? Why don't we keep going? Yeah. We'll see what we hear. Thanks, Glen. Thank you very much. Our next question comes from. I will say, that was just for other analysts' benefit, that was a 1-part question. That wasn't a 4, because we're not starting with the 4-parters. Okay? At first, I thought Glen was going to pull a, you know, I don't know, some other analyst who does 4- or 5-part questions. Sorry. I'm sorry, Sarah, I didn't mean to interrupt you. Oh, no problem. Our next question comes from Stan Berenshteyn, Stan with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Hi, thanks for taking my questions. First, I just want to make sure I caught this correctly. You said you're increasing service fees, that your employers are paying, and it seems like you're early in that. Can you just give us thoughts on the methodology, and how long do you expect until everybody is on board with the new pricing? Well, in particular, that comment refers. Now Tyson's chuckling at me because we had a small bet about whether anyone would ask about this, which I just lost. Thank you for that, Stan. What I was really commenting on there was, in particular, you know, this is several quarters where COBRA has been a bit of a drag for us. Although I will say, overall, we were glad to see a black number on CDB and an almost crookedy-looking black number on CDB ex-COBRA. That was pretty good. My comment was focused on COBRA, and there, you know, the real issue is that we now have in place for several more years now, incremental subsidies, sort of sometimes humorously referred to as the, it's the Extra Affordable Care Act. I think that's by the proponents of these things. They were originally put in place from the pandemic, but they've been extended for a couple of years, and the result of that is lower COBRA uptake. That doesn't necessarily change the offer rates, but it does affect what we call activity fees in COBRA. Naturally, the way we should be making up for that is increasing the service fee component. Like all of our products, COBRA is sold both directly and through our channel partners, in particular, in this case, our health plan partners. We want to work with them carefully, but we have begun to roll out modest fee increases for the service fee component to kind of make up that difference. I think people understood that that was kind of coming because the service, the cost of delivering the service hasn't fundamentally changed. It's really focused on COBRA. Again, the idea isn't that this is gonna drive some, you know, major magic, but we do want the overall CDB growth number from a revenue and so forth perspective to ultimately be a black number. It's not gonna be the driver of our growth, but we don't want it to be dragging us down. Got it. Then maybe just a quick follow-up, and I don't know if you have any money on this, but just back to your prepared remarks, I think you commented that you had more focus on chat-based communications. Can you maybe just give us an update on the adoption of text-based communications within your member base? Then maybe related to that, are you seeing any opportunities to enhance member communication with maybe, like, generative AI technology that's coming up? Thanks. So, I don't think there was money on either of these, but there is a, there are a number of wagers around, whether the term, those two initials that you just mentioned, would appear out of my mouth. I'm gonna see if I can Like, it's more whether I can get through without it more than anything else. Let's find out. Let's say this, in all seriousness, I do think that it's fair to say that for us and others, that the advances in these areas have really accelerated our ability to automate communications on a lot of the more basic queries that we get, and deliver ultimately, you know, what from the member's perspective, is rated to be a superior experience. We have seen, if you were to look at a chart of text-based and then automated text-based over the course of the last really 6 or 8 months, it has gone up quite a bit. Both have gone up. I believe, and I may be off here, but in rough terms right now, one out of every six or seven of our transactions is text-based, and of those transactions, with our members' interactions, of those, between one out of three and almost one out of two are automated. Yep, the new stuff is helping, and I think it's gonna help. I mean, my the nature of my commentary is, again, if you look at service cost, service costs fell year-over-year. There are some other things going on, as I acknowledged in the script. Last year's comp was, let's say, last year, first quarter service cost was not good. That certainly helped. Even if you factor that out, we did very well. I think there's a lot more to come here in terms of our ability to both, you know, simultaneously improve member experience and reduce costs on the service line. Awesome. Thanks so much. Thanks, Dan. Our next question comes from Anne Samuel with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Hi, thanks so much for taking my question. Congrats on the great results. Jon, you know, you spoke early in your prepared remarks about, you know, strength in new employee ads for HSAs, kind of coming in a little bit better than you had expected. Was just wondering if, you know, you could talk a little bit more about that. You know, what are you seeing? Is it labor growth, better enrollment? You know, what's driving that? Interesting. In, you know, our expectation, as I suggested in the prepared remarks, was, and we've tried to communicate this for quite a while, was that, when, you know, we really were benefiting from both growth in the labor market and turnover in the labor market. In fact, if you look at last year, sort of the variance year-over-year, with the exception of Q4, kind of, well, maybe including Q4, kind of came down as turnover in the economy kind of came down, and job growth, kind of relative to Q1 of last year, kind of came down. Now turning to this first quarter, I mean, the way I look at it is that, basically, if the growth of new logos, meaning at this point in the year, mostly smaller employers that would be starting in February, March, April, a few holdovers from January that were late, that kind of thing. But those numbers almost offset the reduction in what I would call, you know, kind of purely organic, same employer growth relative to last year. You know, that's pretty good when you think about the fact that, in the economy as a whole, we're producing jobs at about 55, but it's still extraordinary, but we're producing jobs at about 55% of the rate that we did last Q1, this Q1. I don't know what's shaking or if you all can hear that shaking, but hopefully it's nothing. Oh, I do know what's shaking. It's a big drill. We got an interesting scene outside. Also, you know, when you consider that turnover, particularly voluntary turnover, has, you know, declined in the economy as a whole pretty significantly, you know, we feel pretty good about that. We did have fewer transfers of HSAs from smaller banks, as you might imagine, folks trying to hang on to those accounts in a period where banks have been trying to hang on to deposits, and that accounted for the biggest portion of the delta year-over-year. I guess my basic view is that, if you look at the full year, you know, we have some level of confidence that new logo growth is gonna be sufficient if not fully offset, at least significantly offset what we expect to be a, you know, reduction in the strength of the labor market over the course of the year. That's was meant to be a statement of confidence, and hopefully will be interpreted that way. That's great to hear. Thank you. Thanks, Anne. Our next question comes from George Hill with Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Hey, good evening, guys, thanks for taking the question. Jon, this might be kind of a dovetailed question on Anne's question that was just asked, but I thought I heard you say in your prepared commentary that you're seeing increased HSA adoption at the employer level that will kind of offset job growth. I guess my question is like, are you guys seeing an underlying change in the adoption of HSA levels that is kind of different from the historical trend of them growing 3-ish% a year? Would be interested to hear you talk about what's driving that. Like, if there's any change in the underlying adoption rate. It's early in the year, obviously, but when you look at our, I guess, conceptually, you can think of it as our pipeline, meaning our wins that will onboard later in the year, they are also well ahead of last year. It, and, I do think that what's going on underneath that, well, actually, let me ask, since we have Steve on the line. Steve, you're out there. I don't know if there are any employer prospects in your current undisclosed location, but maybe. Can you talk a little bit about what's driving that activity at the employer level and with our partners? Absolutely. I would've been with you in New York, I wasn't invited. Anyway, hey, George, good to hear your voice, George. Look, I just think that, you know, we've talked about this in the past. Number one, we did have a nice, large name brand employer that came on in the first quarter with an HRA, which, you know, has helped fund the CDB stuff. Then more broadly, as we look at employers and what they're looking at towards the end of the year, I think most of these employers are thinking, you know what? Costs are up, inflation's up. I think a lot of them are, especially in the midsize, are anxiously awaiting to see what's going to happen on their health cost claims. I think most people on this call that know healthcare, they realize that, you know, hospitals are seeing higher labor costs, and at some point, they're going to have to translate this through to, you know, to higher costs to payers, which ultimately ends up getting paid for by employers and things like that. If you just, you know, kind of wrap in the employer's own wage inflation issues and more broad inflation issues, I think most employers are saying, "Look, we know HSA." Look, they read our case studies, and they see big brand name companies that are doing HSAs in kind of novel, interesting ways. We've got a case study out there where an employer, figured out that you could fund lower income people's accounts more than you fund higher income people's accounts, which drives higher adoption in lower, you know, areas where we used to see lower adoption, lower income people that are now starting to, come into the accounts more. That all combined with our, kind of our Engage360 and MaxEnroll initiatives, where we're getting more and more employers signing up to allowing us to, allowing us to be able to reach out to their people in advance of even open enrollment and talk about these things, I think are resulting in the fact that we're just executing better. You know, I, you know, you never want a recession to be a factor that drives your business because you know it hurts all businesses, and you know, it does offset, which just as Jon pointed out, lower overall job growth. We do think that HSAs, because of the cost savings it can bring to employers, because of the tax savings and tax savings it can bring to both employees and employers, that it is one of these things that tends to start to get more interest when you're in a tough, a tougher economic environment. That's what we're seeing, George. Yet we're doing a better job, honestly, than we've ever done before, thanks to our marketing and our inside sales team and things like that, and just getting the word out. I think it's a combination of things. You know, as far as the new logos are concerned, Jon's spoken to that, we're, you know, kind of fingers crossed. We've had a really good sales year, we're looking forward to bringing on some of these great new clients this year. No, that's super helpful. If I could have what I hope is a very quick follow-up. Just a lot of us on the healthcare side are tracking the growth of the GLP-1 drugs that tend to come out of the gate pretty expensive and tend to blow through people's deductibles pretty quick. I was just wondering if you guys are seeing any impact at all on HSA balances or an increase in volatility of the balances through the GLP-1 drugs? Nope, not yet. Okay. All right. Easy answer. Thank you. Thanks, George. Our next question comes from Greg Peters with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Well, good afternoon, everyone. Hey, Greg. Steve, I'll invite you to New York if Jon won't, just, in case that matters. That's very kind of you. Thank you. Yeah. Can you comment on the seasonality and general administration and merger integration related expenses? The reason why I'm asking is they came in a little bit below where I was certainly thinking, and I noticed you didn't change your merger integration guidance for the full year. I would've thought that would've tapered off through the year, but it seems like you're sticking with that number. Just some detail on that would be helpful. Yeah. I mean, we're sticking with the number. We got to spend it, and I think the timing of it's just, it's getting so small now that the timing may add some volatility to it, Greg, is what I would say, so. Then I mentioned G&A as well? Yes. I want to make sure I understand that question a little bit more. Maybe just. Oh, no, I'm sorry. Just inside the PNL, you know, there's a line item, General Administration Expense, it came in a little bit lighter than. I was just wondering if there's anything going on inside there or if that's sort of the normalized expectation that was evident in the first quarter? Yeah, I may go a little bit farther just because you brought up that line. It just, last year, we had some stock comp forfeitures right in there. If you look at last year versus this year, you'll see that it goes up, actually. From a trend line perspective, over a long period of time, of course, we're trying to get, you know, some of the synergies running through there and things like that from. You know, I think you see some of that as well, it's pretty small volatility in my mind, if you just look at the longer term quarters going back through time. I hope that answered what you were trying to ask, and I'm not sure. I think so. I think so. I can take the rest offline. Okay. My other question was just on debt paydown. You know, that's running ahead. What's your expectation for the year on that? We'll take it as we go. I mean, we'll look at what it is. What we did there is we paid off the principal payments for quite some time, so you won't see any short-term portion of that anymore. You know, cash accumulation is going to help that. I'm talking about the next couple of years, we won't have principal payments on it. We were able to elect it that way, so we thought that was a positive thing to do for the business and just make a bite at it. Yep, makes sense. Thanks. Thanks, Greg. Our next question comes from Sandy Draper with Guggenheim. Please go ahead. Thanks very much, and congrats on the strong quarter. This is one question about seasonality that applies to two lines. First off, just trying to make sure, sort of what we've asked a little bit earlier, Tyson, when I'm thinking about either sequentially or year-over-year, the change in account revenue or revenue per account. I'm trying to get the dynamics of the stronger strong growth in HSAs, lower price. You're starting to see some uptick in the CDBs, at least sequentially, but you're still down, by my math, about $0.07. Should we be thinking about sort of flattish, or is it the season should we be thinking about a year-over-year change? How do we think about seasonality there? I wasn't quite clear what your reference when you commented about normal seasonality on the interchange. With the way I usually think about it, the first quarter is the highest, drops down for the next two, and then steps back up in the fourth quarter, but maybe not the first quarter. Is that what you're implying? I just want to make sure I've got the seasonality of those two targets. Yeah, I mean, the second part, I think I'll take that, but you already kind of gave the answer. We just want to reiterate that that's how that seasonality works. You may see it from a perspective of a little bit of better growth rate, maybe this quarter. Okay, that's fine, but it's really just that same seasonality. What we really are trying to make sure on that seasonality comment in the script is just that if you look back over time, we had pandemic, we had last year, we had, you know, an acquisition even a couple of years ago, right? That plays into that. I just feel like, you know, people, I want to make sure people understand that, you know, the quarters are a little bit more sequential and that we don't want people to get ahead of themselves. The other thing to mention there, too, is just the impact from the variable rates that were playing into the second half of last year as well. That's kind of a longer answer to your question. Again, just reiterating on top of that, the interchange portion of that's just normalized. Jon, you're going to take the first part? Yeah, I mean, Sandy, the first part of your question was really about unit, service fees and, meaning service fees over total accounts. Yeah, I think you've kind of got all the right pieces. I mean, the bulk of service fees, as you know, come from the CDB side of the business. As HSAs grow total accounts, there's a little bit of downward pressure, there just from a mix shift perspective. We seem to be holding our own there pretty good, and, I think that's a fair way to look at the full year. I'd probably just leave it there. Got it. That's helpful. Thanks. Thanks, Sandy. Our next question comes from David Larsen with BTIG. Please go ahead. Hi. Congratulations on the good quarter. Can you talk a little bit more about your expectations for yield? I think you said it came in at 232 bips for the quarter. I think it was 211 bips last quarter. The guide, I think you said, is 235. Is that accurate? Over what period of time will you expect to realize the benefit from the increase in the federal funds rate that has occurred over the past year? Will that take a couple of years? I guess what I'm getting at is why only, I think, the 3 basis points of incremental yield between now and year-end? Thanks. Yeah. During the year, during any particular fiscal year, the real variability that we see during the year is around the relatively small portion of our HSA cash that's in variable instruments. Last year, as you know, rates shot up throughout the year as that funds rate did, that really explains of most of the increase that you saw there, plus the fact that we had, you know, good... relative in cash and so forth. This year, it's, you know, again, we'll see what really happens, but as you know, our guidance is based on forward curves now, and our guidance, you know, if you kind of look at forward curves, you can see we sort of, in terms of variable rates, kind of peak up and then swing down. Our basic view is that the result of that is a much smoother situation over the course of the year, relative to last year and similar to many prior years. Our guidance for, as a quarter, you know, is in that way. What you said at the outset, yes, is absolutely correct. Okay, great. Can you maybe just talk a little bit about the interchange revenue? I think it was sort of very good pop sequentially. I mean, what are the key drivers there? I mean, is it commuter revenue? Is it health card utilization and general utilization in the hospital and physician office environment? Just any additional color there would be very helpful. Yeah, I think it, the answer is the commuter does help a little bit because it is outgrowing. You know, really a way to look at it is that the growth we saw in interchange kind of mirrors the growth in, for lack of a better term, accounts with cards, and so, on a year-over-year basis. That's, you know, our new HSAs, and some of our CDBs. It's really, that's pretty much what it is. Okay, great. If I could just squeeze one more in there. The HSA members, it was really flat sequentially. If we adjust for COBRA, what would that have been? Then when do you expect to fully comp the COBRA impact? Could you ask that one more time? I'm sorry. I think I heard it. The number of HSA members relative to Jan 2023, it was up a little bit sequentially, but it looks kind of flat to me, actually. Just, is that because of the COBRA impact? When would you expect to fully comp that? Well, I think what you're referring to is total members. HSA, let's just say HSA members are up 9%. Total accounts on a year-over-year basis. He's talking sequentially. To that point, David, you know, our fourth quarter is when most of our HSAs come in. There isn't a lot of new HSAs. Right. You have 135 open and some closures, your growth is gonna be, what, 100 or 90 or something? Yeah. That's on the base of $8 million. It's the first quarter is the answer to that question. Great. Thank you very much. Thanks, David. Our next question comes from Scott Schoenhaus with KeyBanc. Please go ahead. Thanks. Congrats, guys. Thanks for taking my question. Apologies if I missed it, but did you state where your your book, the book of business is in terms of Enhanced Rate? Did you reiterate your 30% target for the end of the year? I didn't know that thing had risen to the level of something we reiterate, but yes, it's still our target. Okay. Where are you currently at, Sean? We're a few hundred basis points shy of that. We're gonna get there. Great. Great. Just a question on the M&A environment. I know that it has been kind of more slow than you expected, given that, you know, these banks want to hold on to these sticky HSA assets. Has anything changed, from 3 months ago when you made those comments? Fundamentally, no. I do think that, I think it's a point where because. Let me back up and say one thing, which is, as other analysts have noted, we have a laddered strategy, and some of our competitors have a more exposed strategy, either by virtue of the way they're structured or otherwise. If you're more exposed, and I'm not thinking about the small banks, but maybe some of the other first, you know, competitors. If you're more exposed to short rates, this might be a time where you're really looking at this because, if you think that things are going to get wild and wooly with short rates. There's a little bit of that kind of chatter. Fundamentally, I mean, look, the fact that we did a pay down and so forth suggests that we feel like this is a period where we're more accumulating capital than spending it. I think, you know, that's probably fair. Again, it also impacts our new HSA openings in the sense of just smaller, you know, HSA transfers that occur from smaller banks. Thanks for the color. Thanks, Scott. Our next question comes from Stephanie Davis with SVB Leerink. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Congrats on the quarter. Thank you for taking my question. I hate to be the one to bring up bank turmoil, but last quarter, we did have a lot of discussions around, you know, enduring impacts from some of the events in March and how it could maybe create greater demand for your sticky HSA deposits. The bank turmoil has continued. I was wondering if you've seen any greater interest in custodial partnerships from folks at the regional banks, or if you're still mostly focused on second-story banks and avoiding the regional bank opportunity? I'm going to say yes to your first question. On your second question, what we really concern ourselves with from our perspective, we concern ourselves with the general quality of the institution, and it's not that we're, I mean, at the end of the day, the FDIC is going to back our members. It's more that we wanna have long-term relationships. We don't kind of want it to be a, you know, a one-and-done situation like some FSA accounts, but not Florida. It's everyone graduates, amazing. Am I the college in this question, of Florida? No, I mean, Florida's awesome. Everyone knows it. Everyone knows it. They got this huge, I could use those two letters that everyone's talking about these days. You know, Florida's killing it. We'll move on from there. The answer to your first question is yes, and the answer to your second question is, we'll look at those things. This isn't a cash deployment season, but, you know, we want to build relationships that are gonna last, with different institutions one way or the other. Let's do a follow-up on that then. Is there any other way to get more granularity on the yield upside? Just, I mean, you had the giant magnitude of the beat. Is it the contract renegotiations came in better than expected, maybe not from regional banks, but something else? Was it floating rate mix? Was it Enhanced Rates mix? Like, how enduring is this, and how much could it be an interquarter impact? I don't think it's a huge interquarter impact because most of the renegotiations and the like that we do are at the end of the year. The benefit we saw in the 1st quarter was principally a result of the movement to Enhanced Rates, and the benefit on variable cash. Meaning, from a yield perspective. I would think that this could be a benefit to us at year-end, but on the other hand, you know, there's a lot of stuff floating around at year-end, and year-end's a long time away. I will say one of the benefits of the Enhanced Rates program as it matures over the course of multiple years, is that we're gonna have less of this year-end thing. We won't all be holding our breath for December and January every year, and that will be good. I'll keep Cordell busy. All right, thank you. I'll hop back in the queue. Bye. Don't, that's not a name we mentioned because recruiters listen to these things. Say it. Our next question comes from Mark Marcon with Baird. Please go ahead. Hey, good afternoon, and congratulations. Steve, we would be thrilled if you were here in New York with us. We're super glad that Jon and Mike are here. You know, I didn't even know I had any authority over where Steve went. That's a new thing to me. In any event, I'm sorry, Mark, go ahead. We're looking forward to seeing you guys tomorrow. Just a very short question and then a little bit of a longer one. The super short question is, on the enhanced yield product, is the duration structure the same as what you had on your traditional, bank, partnership agreements? Our cash commitment under Enhanced Rates is a little bit different. It's typically a 5-year cash commitment. However, the reason we can do that is that we are that whereas in the bank products, we have to have separate products to provide for the liquidity. Here, the liquidity is built in. The actual average duration, if you want to think about it that way, when you account for the fact that there's a portion that we have, we can pull in and out whenever we want, is much closer to our 3-year inside track. How sensitive is that portion of the Enhanced yield product to changes in yields in the overall market? It's not. The liquidity component is built into the underlying rate we receive. Again, all of this is designed to produce. In addition to a higher yield overall, it's designed to produce smoothness over time. We wanna get you all, as best as we can, out of the business, at least, you know, for the short and medium term of, you know, being fixed income outs. Okay, great. Just wanted some general comments with regards to, you know, the competitive environment. I mean, you're clearly, you continue to gain the most share and continue to grow rapidly. Just wondering, you know, how has that evolved, say, over the last two years? What's your, what's your perspective, Jon? I guess I would generally say that what we're seeing over this period of time is a continuation of trends that we've seen for a long time. You know, if you look at the Devenir information that came out, I think it came out since we last announced. You know, in addition to showing, and maybe it was just before, I can't remember. In addition to, you know, showing that we had maintained our number 1 position in terms of both assets and accounts, I mean, it does show a consolidation and that, you know, really, if you look at it among the 4 or 5 largest players, the growth is principally come from, in market share terms, has principally come from HealthEquity and Fidelity. We do compete with each other, obviously, but we also, and you can see this in the average balances, we also fish in somewhat different ponds in terms of, Fidelity also doing a lot of rollover business and the like, as people retire. I think, you know, that's the main, what I've seen is that we're really benefiting at the expense of some other players. I guess I would say one other thing, Mark, that isn't, you know, it's not something that's always very exciting to talk about on these calls, but as we discussed, back in March, the team had a very, very good year from the perspective of execution on service to our clients and to their broker partners and our retirement partners and our health plan partners, at the end of the year. I think that's helping in terms of new logo wins. You know, I really do. When people have a good experience at the end of the year, like the brokers, they're more likely to send business your way in the next year. That's, you know, very much to the credit of, you know, Angela Keele and the service team and our technology team led by Eli Rosner on the tech side, and Merv and Larry on the security and IT side. I just think that plays a role as well. Thanks, Mark. Terrific. Thank you. Look forward to seeing you tomorrow. Yep. Yes, sir. Hey, Mark, I'll miss you, man, but next time. There's still a red eye, that's all I'm saying. I will call your bluff. I like seeing Mark when there's snow on the ground, and there's no snow back there, so. He's a skier. Who's next? Our next question comes from Allen Lutz with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Thanks for taking the questions. I guess one for Tyson. You've talked about the Enhanced Rates product kind of going from zero to goal of 30% this year, so over three years, from nothing to 30% of the book. I'm looking at the custodial cost of goods sold line, and that really hasn't moved as a percent of custodial cash over that time period. I'm looking at the Enhanced Rates here, and they're obviously higher than the core rates that you're paying out to the consumer. I'm just curious, is there something going on with the type of consumer that's electing for the Enhanced Rates? Do they have a much smaller cash portfolio than the average, you know, just normal customer? I'm curious what the disconnect is there. Thanks. Yeah, I'm gonna take this one 'cause it's really the answer has much more to do with the marketing and so forth. There are two things going on there. First, keep in mind that the uptake rate among new account holders is very high, and by definition, new account holders have smaller balances. We have not, you know, so the impact has been pretty modest in terms of of if you sort of fold the whole thing into our custodial expense. Now, you know, that will change over time in relative terms, relative to what would have occurred with cash, but that's really the big answer to your question. It's not a function perhaps of like, predilection one way or the other. It is a function of, the fact that, you are, you know, that the product is the people who are most likely to see it are, you're brand new to us, and, you're making a decision up front about where you're gonna go. You know, something like, I wanna say 85%-90% of our new enrollees are choosing Enhanced Rates. A second point I would make is that people who keep very large cash balances, the kind that earn relatively high rates, they're typically doing that precisely because they place very high value on the FDIC component of it, right? Otherwise, they would be investing those dollars or putting them in a short-term bond fund or what have you. You know, in a funny way, it's not entirely unreasonable to expect that those folks would stay in FDIC cash. Got it. Thank you very much. I thought about this question, too. We were curious about it over the last few quarters, and this is the first time in this forum anyone's asked about it, but that's the answer. Thanks, Allen. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jon Kessler for any closing remarks. First of all, thanks, everyone. I'm sorry if you've already pre-purchased cabana wear. We'll do our best, like Richard. We did get this thing done in under an hour, which is something to celebrate for you as well as for us, and particularly for Richard. I think there's a double standard on the length of answers. Mine were, I think, on average, the shortest, but nonetheless, thank you all, appreciate the team's work on a great quarter. We will, if not earlier, see everyone back in September. Bye-bye. The conference is now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.