Greetings, welcome to the Huntsman Corporation Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Ivan Marcuse, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you, sir. You may begin. Thank you, Christine, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Huntsman's Second Quarter 2021 Earnings Call. Joining us on the call today are Peter Huntsman, Chairman, CEO, and President, Phil Lister, Executive Vice President and CFO, and Tony Hankins, President of Polyurethanes. This morning before market opened, we released our earnings for the second quarter of 2021 via press release and posted it to our website, huntsman.com. We also posted a set of slides on our website, which we will use on the call this morning while presenting our results. During this call, we may make statements about our projections or expectations for the future. All such statements are forward-looking statements, and while they reflect our current expectations, they involve risks and uncertainties and are not guarantees of future performance. You should review our filings with the SEC for more information regarding the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from these projections or expectations. We do not plan on publicly updating or revising any forward-looking statements during the quarter. We also refer to non-GAAP financial measures such as diluted, adjusted EBITDA, adjusted net income or loss, and free cash flow. You can find reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures in our earnings release, which has been posted to our website, huntsman.com. I will now turn the call over to Peter Huntsman, our Chairman, CEO, and President. Thank you, Ivan. Good morning, everybody, and thank you for taking the time to join us this morning. Let's start out on slide number three. Adjusted EBITDA for our Polyurethanes division in the second quarter was $208 million versus $31 million of a year ago. Our Polyurethanes division continued to improve, posting 13% year-on-year volume growth and 18% adjusted EBITDA margins. Our differentiated volume, which includes our spray insulation, automotive, and elastomers businesses, grew by 22%. As a reminder, during the second quarter, we conducted a major turnaround at our MDI facility in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. This turnaround occurs once every four years, with many third-party supply facilities carrying out turnarounds at the same time. Downtime associated with the turnaround negatively impacted volumes and adjusted EBITDA by approximately $35 million in the quarter. This was $10 million more than we communicated to you last quarter, as several third-party issues delayed our startup and forced the plant to run at lower rates for an extended period in May and June. The good news is that this turnaround is behind us and operations at Rotterdam have returned to normal. Excluding the impact of the Rotterdam turnaround, our total volumes would have grown at 22% year-on-year, as we were essentially sold out on our MDI units worldwide. We continue to see a strong recovery in our Americas and Asian regions, with MDI volumes growing 15% and 13% respectively versus the first quarter. Significantly higher margins also drove year-over-year adjusted EBITDA growth in the quarter. Higher average selling prices offset higher raw material costs and unplanned outages. We believe that longer-term supply and demand fundamentals in the MDI industry will remain balanced and margins will remain at a fairly healthy level for the foreseeable future. Growth in our core construction markets, including insulation, adhesives, and coatings, continue to lead the recovery in urethanes. All these sectors saw growth on a quarter-over-quarter basis, even in Europe, where we had both planned and unplanned disruptions associated with the Rotterdam turnaround. North American insulation businesses, including spray foam and our composite wood products business, remain solid as we see residential construction spending remaining robust and commercial construction spending picking up. Our order book for spray foam has never been stronger, and we're implementing price increases to help to offset higher raw material pricing and logistical costs. Elastomers, which included our global footwear business, is another core growth platform for Polyurethanes, and it continues to see strong recovery trends globally. Demand in both industrial and consumer markets within elastomers remains strong. Results would have been even better this past quarter had it not been for shortages in some key raw materials and higher logistical costs. We expect our business to keep up the momentum for the remainder of 2021. Our global automotive business significantly increased year-over-year due to favorable comparisons. However, volumes were down mid-single digits compared to the first quarter due to the ongoing chip shortages, which have resulted in lower production rates industry-wide. Having said that, global demand in our markets is strong, and we were able to redirect volumes originally intended for the automotive market into markets utilizing similar chemistries. Our Polyurethanes strategy is to upgrade the quality of our portfolio. We will continue to redirect more of our plant's output to our differentiated businesses and bottom slice lower-margin component business. We will invest in our downstream businesses organically and where it makes sense through bolt-on acquisitions, where we can generate higher and more stable margins through long-term contracts in our components business, we are doing so. Our splitter investment in Geismar, Louisiana is consistent with this strategy. Once completed, the new splitter will allow us to produce more higher value MDI molecules while maintaining the same total plant output. This investment is progressing very well. We're seeing strong demand for materials that are the output of this project, and we're moving aggressively to complete this project as soon as possible to take advantage of these conditions. We now expect to complete construction at the end of the first quarter 2022, earlier than originally planned. Once fully operational, we expect this project to contribute $30 million in incremental adjusted EBITDA on an annual basis and expect to see stronger margins next year as a result of our earlier than planned completion. Our PO/MTBE joint venture with Sinopec in China, where we own a 49% interest, continues to benefit from very strong margins and is driving above-average equity earnings. We do see our equity earnings associated with this joint venture being lower in the second half of the year when compared to the first half of 2021. Overall, we remain very positive about the trends that we are seeing in polyurethanes globally. Demand is solid, and the industry is toggling between balanced and tight at this point in time. Substitution will continue to help drive MDI growth and our sustainable solutions products, which deliver increased energy efficiency, are expected to follow trends that will have a very positive impact on MDI demand for the foreseeable future. Looking into the third quarter, we see general demand fundamentals remaining solid or better. Lower turnaround costs are already impacting the bottom line of the business in a positive manner. Even with typical seasonality and lower joint venture equity earnings, we would expect our Polyurethanes third quarter adjusted EBITDA to be between $240 million and $260 million. Turning to slide number four. Let's talk about our Performance Products segment, which reported an adjusted EBITDA of $88 million compared to $29 million in last year's third quarter. The improvement in this division was partially due to a strong finish in the first quarter, with sales migrating into the second quarter. The division also benefited from stronger pricing and margins due to tighter markets, competitor outages, and better pricing discipline. Accordingly, our amines and maleic portfolio has recovered quicker and performed better than we expected at the beginning of the year, delivering over 20% adjusted EBITDA margins in the second quarter. Performance Products' strong financial results, not just in the second quarter, but increasingly across the last several quarters, reflect a refresh of the business strategy implemented after the sale of our chemical intermediates and surfactants businesses. This division is focused on targeted growth in our specialty amines, carbonates, and catalysts while driving commercial excellence across the entire segment, including our maleic anhydride business. These changes are already bearing fruit and are expected to have a meaningful positive impact on earnings moving forward. Volumes in our Performance Products segments were up 25% versus favorable comparisons in last year's second quarter, importantly, are now at or above 2019 demand levels in most of the division's core markets. Leading the way are amines used in polyurethane catalysts, construction, and composite markets. Construction demand is also having a favorable impact on maleic anhydride volumes sold into UPR. Opportunities to make bolt-on acquisitions in this segment tend to be more limited and in some cases, do not exist as we are building new markets. As such, Performance Products remains focused on driving growth primarily through high return, low capital organic investments. These investments include projects to develop catalysts serving the VOC-free polyurethanes market, ultra-pure carbonates into lithium batteries, and high purity amines used in semiconductor manufacturing. We expect these investments will begin contributing in a meaningful way in the next two to three years. We see overall demand for Performance Products offerings remaining solid for the foreseeable future. In the third quarter, while there will be some typical seasonality, planned turnarounds, and more balanced amine markets, we still expect third quarter adjusted EBITDA to be between $75 million and $80 million. Let's turn to slide number five. Advanced Materials reported adjusted EBITDA of $58 million in the quarter, a significant improvement year-over-year, driven primarily by the continuing recovery of our core industrial businesses and improving contributions from our recent acquisitions. Excluding the acquisition of Gabriel Performance Products, sales revenue in Advanced Materials increased 42% compared to the second quarter of 2020, generating adjusted EBITDA margins of 19%. Aerospace results were flat in the quarter versus the prior year. We saw another quarter of sequential improvement, which we expect to see again in the third quarter. We still think a full recovery to pre-pandemic levels in this segment will take another year or two, given our exposure to the wide-body planes used more in international travel. We're encouraged that the recovery is tracking better than we had anticipated earlier this year. Excluding aerospace, sales in our other core specialty businesses experienced growth year-over-year and are now slightly above 2019 levels. Additionally, the integration of CVC Thermoset Specialties and Gabriel Performance Products continues on plan. We remain confident that we will achieve the total run rate synergies of $23 million we communicated at the time each of these respective transactions were announced. Overall, our Advanced Materials division is tracking well, and as aerospace recovers, we expect this division to consistently generate adjusted EBITDA margins in excess of 20%. We will continue to grow this division organically and through targeted bolt-on acquisitions. Third quarter adjusted EBITDA for Advanced Materials should look similar quarter-over-quarter, subject to typical seasonality, and be between $50 million and $55 million. Moving to slide number six. Our Textile Effects division reported an adjusted EBITDA of $28 million for the second quarter. The recovery in earnings has been driven by higher sales, which more than doubled compared to the second quarter a year ago, and demand has returned to pre-pandemic levels in our key markets. We saw volume improvements across every product category when compared to the prior year and generated 14% adjusted EBITDA margins in the second quarter. Consumer sentiment in the U.S. and Europe continues to improve, retail store traffic and sales in each region are showing positive signs. Sustainability within the retail channel remains a focus for our customers and for us. This macro trend favors our leading technologies that are environmentally friendly in areas such as water reduction, which continues to gain share. Some of our Asian customers were adversely affected by the renewed restrictions associated with the return of higher numbers of COVID cases in certain regions towards the end of the quarter. While we are watching these dynamics closely, we still see adjusted EBITDA in the third quarter to be well above pre-pandemic levels. Before sharing some concluding thoughts, I'd like to turn a few minutes over to Phil Lister, our Chief Financial Officer. Thank you, Peter. Turning to slide seven. We were pleased to see the continuation of a strong recovery across the portfolio. Adjusted EBITDA increased by $280 million year-over-year, and by $45 million, or 16%, quarter-over-quarter. The improvement in EBITDA from the prior quarter is in spite of an approximate $35 million impact from the extended turnaround at our Rotterdam MDI facility. In particular, we were pleased with the performance of both the Advanced Materials and the Performance Products divisions, both of which achieved strong adjusted EBITDA margins in the quarter and where we are investing inorganically and organically to grow these two divisions. The increase in volumes year-on-year is primarily attributed to strong growth since the depths of the global pandemic across the majority of our portfolio and businesses. Variable margins significantly improved, leading to adjusted EBITDA margins moving into the high teens at 17%. Sales price increases exceeded some rapid increases in raw materials, which have occurred since the beginning of the year. Turning to slide eight. We continue to make good progress with the integration of our recent acquisitions. A reminder that our Huntsman Building Solutions target synergies have been exceeded, and our Advanced Materials acquisitions of Gabriel and CVC remain on track to deliver $23 million of synergies. In addition, our cost optimization plans also remain on track with our program and Performance Products fully completed. In total, we expect to achieve full year acquisition synergies and cost optimization of approximately $90 million in 2021, with a target of approximately $110 million in 2022. Turning to slide nine. We had a use of free cash flow from continuing operations of $83 million in the second quarter as a result of the extended turnaround at our Rotterdam MDI facility. The Rotterdam MDI turnaround is now behind us for another four years, and we anticipate significant free cash flow generation in the second half of the year. Consistent with remarks made on our last earnings call, we anticipate a free cash flow conversion rate to adjusted EBITDA of approximately 25% for the full year. As Peter indicated, our MDI splitter project is now scheduled to come online earlier than previously anticipated. As a result, due to the acceleration of this project, capital expenditures for 2021 will now be $355 million-$360 million, approximately $25 million-$30 million higher than previously indicated. This acceleration of spend in 2021, along with increased adjusted EBITDA from the earlier startup of the splitter, will contribute to a targeted free cash flow conversion of approximately 40% in 2022. Should present demand trends continue, we see no reason why we should not be targeting and meeting or exceeding a 40% free cash flow conversion after this year. During the second quarter, we received a $28 million earn-out related to the sale of our India DIY business, bringing gross proceeds to $285 million and a multiple of approximately 15x 2019 adjusted EBITDA on the sale of the business. Our balance sheet remains strong with $1.9 billion of liquidity and a net debt to adjusted EBITDA leverage of one time at the end of quarter two. During the quarter, we completed an offering of $400 million in 2.95% senior notes due in 2031 and used the net proceeds and cash on hand to redeem in full $400 million of 5.125% senior notes due in 2022. Combined, these transactions will save approximately $9 million in annual cash interest. Addressing capital allocation. Following the divestment of approximately one-fifth of Huntsman's portfolio to Indorama in early 2020, we have focused on building our core platforms through targeted bolt-on acquisitions. Where it makes sense from a valuation perspective, this M&A strategy will continue as we intend to grow our core platforms, particularly in our specialty and downstream businesses. As a reminder, we increased our dividend by approximately 15% earlier this year, and we currently have an approximate 3% dividend yield on our equity. In addition, we have an existing share repurchase plan authorized by our board of up to $1 billion, of which we had bought back $580 million prior to the global pandemic. We have placed share buybacks on hold during the pandemic. Taking account of market conditions and an appropriate return on capital, we anticipate resuming some level of share repurchases in the second half of the year. Peter, back to you. Thank you, Phil. I think the results of this past quarter mark a significant milestone in our recovery from the recent calamitous results of the past five quarters due to a global pandemic. The last time we had a quarter of this level of EBITDA was in 2017, 2018, during a time when our Polyurethanes business was enjoying unusually strong market conditions. At that time, MDI made up as much as 74% of our EBITDA. I think it is worth pausing and asking what is different today and what more is there yet to come. This past quarter, Polyurethanes made up 54% of our adjusted EBITDA. As we see the result of a stronger Performance Products, a recovery in Advanced Materials, and a Textile Effects business that is likewise seeing a return to normality. I hardly see the second quarter as being peak results. As I look at the coming quarters, we will see the effects of the completion of our Geismar, Louisiana, MDI splitter. That will start generating EBITDA in the second quarter of next year. We will also see the benefits of an additional $20 million of cost savings as we streamline our Polyurethanes business. Our Polyurethane spray foam business has been constrained due to raw material supply issues that will be solved in the second half of this year. MDI remains well-balanced. However, during the second half of this year, just over 10% of the global capacity of MDI will be lost due to announced closures for needed maintenance work. This will be taking place at a time when our facilities ought to be operating at designed rates and sold out. In our Performance Products division, we saw strong margins and some one-time benefits. The core of this business has fundamentally changed. We've expanded our customer portfolio, controlled costs, and exercised better pricing discipline. We've initiated projects that will continue to change this division as we expand production of our urethanes catalyst capacity, our products feeding the semiconductor business, and carbonates that will make us one of the largest sources of battery-grade carbonates in the Americas. These projects will be completed by 2023. Our Advanced Materials division has gone through a meaningful change this past year as we've purchased and integrated our recent acquisitions of CVC and Gabriel. We'll see further cost optimization and commercial synergies in excess of $13 million by 2023, building upon the $10 million we will achieve this year. We will also see the return of our aerospace business that will further enhance our EBITDA by an additional $40 million-$50 million when it's fully recovered. Our Textile Effects business will not only see the continued recovery of its retail customer base, but the completion of our Bangladeshi expansion that will deliver $10 million annually. In short, in the coming quarters, the groundwork is being laid for over $150 million of additional EBITDA that will take place across our businesses. Aside from aerospace, this assumes no further recovery in the market. Additionally, we have a very strong balance sheet that affords us to aggressively pursue M&A opportunities. This will be done where we have true synergies, growth opportunities, and the ability to stabilize our earnings. Having said that, I am surprised at some of the multiples that have been seen in some of the recent transactions in this industry. As I have said before, we will be disciplined. The quality of our earnings will continue to be of paramount importance. This past quarter notwithstanding, when we experienced a perfect storm of third-party outages, unplanned inventory build, and associated lost sales, most of which will be recovered in the second half of this year, we are confident of our ability to deliver greater than 25% free cash flow to EBITDA this year. Should present market conditions prevail, we will see this percentage of free cash flow to EBITDA increase to 40% this next year. Finally, as Phil mentioned in his comments, we continue to pay a competitive dividend and will be reviewing our purchase of Huntsman shares. These share purchases will be determined by alternative uses of capital, as well as the return on any such capital employed. In short, we hardly see these market conditions as anything but a normalized level with plenty more opportunity yet to come. Operator, at this time, we will turn over to any questions that are in line. Thank you. Our first question comes from the line of Frank Mitsch with Fermium Research. Please proceed with your question. Good morning. Congrats, Phil, on being named CFO. Peter, working through the numbers, it looks like you're expecting third quarter to be better than the second quarter in terms of EBITDA. That typically is not the case with Huntsman. I think you have to go back several years when you find something like that. Given that you're not anticipating to see that typical seasonality or there's other factors at work in terms of inventories, et cetera, what does your early read on fourth quarter suggest? That is, typically you see even greater seasonality in the fourth quarter. Is this an anomalous year? How should we be thinking about the seasonality impact on Huntsman? I think that as we look into the third quarter, we will see a little bit of seasonality during the third quarter, but we're also going to see the reversal of the T&I or the downtime that we saw in Rotterdam. When we back that out, as well as some of the cost reductions that continue to flow through and the pricing initiatives that we have, I think that we're going to see, you're right, a stronger third quarter certainly than our second quarter. We'll see our corporate expenses at that time in the third quarter and probably about the same in the fourth quarter, about $50 million a quarter. Reminding you that there is some LIFO charges in that number, and also we're seeing a recovery in our business travel and expenses and so forth, just associated with running the business. We look at that third quarter, we feel very confident about it. At this time, barring a major pandemic closure of the economy or anything, I would think that our fourth quarter is going to continue to be strong. I think our second half of the year, again, from where I sit right now, should be a stronger half than the first half of the year. Again, that's looking at the present demand trends and so forth. Still very early in the third quarter, but I've got quite a bit of confidence. I did mention that we're looking at losing about 10% of the capacity in the third quarter. That will also be about 10% of the industry capacity for MDI in the fourth quarter as well, as we see a number of plants that are coming down for maintenance. Some of those have been postponed since earlier in the year to the second half of this year. I don't see a lot of movement from that scheduling or further delays, if you will. I think the second half of this year, we're going to see some pretty good demand and probably some constrained capacity. Our next question comes from the line of Angel Castillo with Morgan Stanley. Please proceed with your question. Hi, thanks for taking my question, and congrats on the strong quarter. Phil, welcome as well. Just a quick question on MDI. I'm curious, you talked about the differentiated volumes being stronger in the quarter than kind of the overall segment. As you look at those end markets and kind of the mix between kind of the more commodity versus the differentiated volumes, curious if you could give us more color. What are you seeing beyond those volumes kind of going forward, and what does that mean for your margins as well in terms of, we all track MDI spreads, but in terms of the mix that could benefit. I'm going to have Tony Hankins, who's our divisional president, perhaps comment on some of the macro trends that we're seeing regionally. As we look at it globally, again, we're looking at an environment where we're trying to take as much as our more commoditized tonnage and moving that into further downstream. Again, I just want to remind the market that there will be some times when people might be scratching their heads saying, "Why aren't we benefiting as much during some of the cyclical upside that you see on some of the more commoditized grades in some of these times of outages and so forth?" I think we're trying to look at an MDI business that delivers more reliable margins, has a better consistent cash flow, and isn't so dependent on spot pricing. Tony, any comments that you have about some of the regional impacts we're seeing? Yes, thank you, Peter. Good morning, Angel. We're seeing very strong demand right now in two of our three core downstream franchises. That's Huntsman Building Solutions, which is spray foam, and our elastomers business, particularly the footwear business and the industrial elastomers business, where we're seeing very strong double-digit growth there right through the second half of the year. We're sold out. We've got an eight-week order backlog in HBS. The good news in that business is commercial construction is starting to pick up, and we're seeing spray foam moving into that much more strongly than the past, in addition to the residential construction area, which has been very strong, as you know, with new home builds. We're very upbeat about that. Automotive has been off about 10% this quarter because of the chip shortage. I think that's going to ease up a bit towards the end of the year, but it's clearly constraining automotive. We move those products into other chemistries, as Peter said on the call. Those other chemistries are things like flexible foam into memory foam mattresses and pillows, where we've seen 35% quarter-on-quarter growth in those areas. We're very optimistic and very upbeat about the growth going forward in the second half in our downstream differentiated businesses. We're moving molecules from our components side of the business into those downstream markets. That's the whole strategy of upvaluing, moving from components to specialty, where the margins are higher, where the earnings are sustainable, and where we're seeing real benefit, particularly from the infrastructure build and the climate change investments, which are going to be made in not just the coming quarters, but the coming years. We're very upbeat about these downstream businesses that we serve. Our next question comes from the line of Bob Koort with Goldman Sachs. Please proceed with your question. Thank you very much. Peter, I was curious, you made a note that you're going to start maybe buying back some stock, and also suggested that maybe multiples in the marketplace are a little elevated. You guys have been very exceptional at selling assets. Is there any scope maybe to monetize some more assets and take advantage of those bids? What will be the sort of hurdle or limiting gate factor on how much or at what price you'd buy back stock, would you think? Well Bob, very good question. We're going to be looking at it really on a case-by-case basis as we weigh the alternative uses of capital. Frankly, I'd rather see cash going into business expansion and M&A than share buyback. Again, it's a pretty simple equation, is when we balance that return on capital employed and share buybacks versus M&A. I think it needs to be a measured approach and something that we're going to be looking at carefully throughout the second half. It's part of a balanced approach that we have, as we've done in the past. Just remind the market here that we've bought in nearly a half a billion dollars of our own shares over the last two and a half years, with the proceeds coming from Indorama and just cash coming from the operations of the business. I see that continuing. As we look at possible asset sales, as I've said in past calls, we continue to look at our overall portfolio, and as we find opportunities where those looking at our business will put a higher value on certain assets that perhaps than we may have internally, we'll certainly entertain that. As I've said in the past again, we certainly are not at a point where I'd say that there's nothing for sale within the company. Again, that's not to say that we're out trying to sell off divisions or anything, but again, it is to say that I think that any company has got to be able to look at where they can refresh and how they can refresh their portfolio. Our next question comes from the line of Hassan Ahmed with Alembic Global. Please share with your question. Morning, Peter and Phil. Peter, just wanted to focus on the Q3 guidance you've given specifically for the Polyurethanes business. If I adjust for lost earnings from the Rotterdam turnaround, it seems that you guys are guiding to flat to slightly up EBITDA Q2 to Q3. If I sort of triangulate that with some of the comments that I heard, it seems that probably volumes are going to be up, and this is all obviously adjusted for the Rotterdam turnaround. It seems volumes will be up in Q3 sequentially. You guys have pricing initiatives in place. What am I missing here? From the sounds of it seems Q2 to Q3 Polyurethanes segment EBITDA should be up nicely. Are you guys being relatively conservative with that guidance? Well, I would never accuse Mr. Hankins here of sandbagging numbers, Hassan. I would put a couple things in mind. On the positive side. Well, let me start with the negative, and end with the positive on the two areas of concern that I have, looking into the third quarter. One of those is going to be the lower, remember in that Polyurethanes numbers, we have our joint venture from our PO/MTBE joint venture, the equity earnings coming out of that in China. In the second quarter, I think that we had quite a bit better than average earnings in the second quarter coming from that. I see that cooling in the third quarter, of which is selling propylene oxide and MTBE. As those markets come into better balance, I think that those earnings probably will be slowing a bit in the third quarter. In the third quarter, also, we're going to be seeing the effects of higher raw materials, particularly benzene. Now, we're seeing benzene coming off of a recent $4-$5 high this past quarter, and dropping down into the $3 and change area. Remember that our time of buying the benzene, transporting the benzene, converting it to nitrobenzene, aniline, crude MDI, working it through our system, typically is about a quarter impact. What we saw in raw material increases in the second quarter will be hitting us in the third. On the negative side, I'd say, again, some pressures on the earnings on the PO/MTBE side, and also having to deal with higher raw material costs and benzene, that we know will be working its way through the system. On the positive side, yes, the T&I is behind us. We have greater volumes, and we are going to be pushing for price increases. That will be price increases across the board, and it will be price increases that we're presently working with, as I made mention in my comment, with those longer-term contracts, where we have, particularly in the Americas, where we have long-term agreements, kind of pass-through sort of agreements. Many of those are coming due at this time, and as Tony articulated, our objective in the Americas is to take our polymeric, our commodity businesses, and move those further downstream. We're going to do that in two ways. We're going to do that by putting it to the splitter and moving those into new markets, those molecules that today are being sold at commodity pricing. Those are the same pounds that also get moved into the spray foam business that we see growing at double-digit rates. Our percentage of polymeric commodity-based MDI, particularly in North America, is going to continue to be a shrinking market for us. We have an opportunity with the remaining customer base that we have, to evaluate those customers, the service that we're giving, the value that we're creating for them, and look at that pricing as well. Sorry, long-winded answer here, as we look into the third quarter, I think many of those things that we'll be implementing in the third quarter will spill over into the fourth quarter, even though we'll see seasonality in the fourth quarter. I think many of the positive attributes will spill over in the fourth quarter, which gives me, as I mentioned earlier, a lot of optimism, not just the second half of this year, but going into 2022. Our next question comes from the line of Kevin McCarthy with Vertical Research Partners. Please proceed with your question. Good morning. This is Corey on for Kevin. Looking at the Performance Products segment, we've heard that Huntsman is out with a price increase of $0.08 per pound for maleic anhydride in the third quarter. Sorry, effective August 1st. Can you talk about maybe some of the price drivers for maleic and maybe the sustainability of those drivers as you see it through the second half and into next year? Could you break that down by region? I think we've seen a little bit of weakening in Europe versus the U.S. and China. Thank you. When we look at our maleic businesses, bear in mind that one of the two major drivers there, as with most products, raw materials. In the second quarter, we saw an average raw material cost for the business across the board, just under $1 a gallon, and we see a current price of around $1.30 a gallon. 30 something percent increase in raw material prices, which are going to necessitate higher selling prices for our maleic to offset that. We're also seeing very strong demand in the maleic, particularly in North America and in Asia. I think that we're seeing decent demand in Europe, not as strong as we are in North America and in Asia. I continue to be quite bullish on the maleic business. I think the fundamentals of it are strong. We're a global leader in the capacity and in the economics and in the technology to produce maleic. I continue to believe it's going to continue to be a business that delivers very strong results for us. Our next question comes from the line of Mike Leithead with Barclays. Please proceed with your question. Great. Thanks. Good morning, guys. Question just on the raw material front. I think outside of benzene, the company is a fairly decent-sized buyer of chlorine and epi. If you look at those products, there's been not only a fair amount of supply disruptions lately, but the largest U.S. producer of both products has been pretty vocal that price is only going to go upward moving forward. Just curious how you think about your security of supply there and your ability to get pricing to offset that. Well, look, it is a time when, as we see the recovery of the global economy, the demand that's being pulled on the global economy, that we are going to see raw material pressure probably across the board. I will just note, though, that as we are looking into the third quarter, into the fourth quarter, we are starting to see prices diminish on the raw material front. Benzene seemingly has peaked in the second quarter going into the third quarter. Typically, going into the winter months, the gasoline slate and a lot of what refineries produce, you'll start seeing a diminishment in some of those values as well. On our epichlorohydrin and chlorine, so forth, I'm not going to comment on particular buying strategies and so forth. In the area, particularly of epichlorohydrin, there have been some disruptions from the supply, particularly from Asia. Those things will be worked through. Look, we've been buyers or producers of epichlorohydrin for many years. This is a global commodity. It's going to move with supply and demand. That's just the way it is. I think in many commodities in this industry, you sometimes get in those positions where you think prices are always going to stay high and prices will never diminish, and economic reality will hit you, particularly in commodities when you've got global competition. I think longer term, in spite of people trying to lock in long-term prices quote forever, the vicissitudes of the markets will continue to be the same. I don't see any fundamental change in that. You look in China, our large MDI plant, we have HCl recycling there, meaning that we recycle our chlorine. We're looking at the possibility and the economic models of doing that more widespread throughout the company. I think as you start looking at technologies, more and more our technologies not only will be from an environmental point of view, but how do we reduce, how do we recycle, and how do we capitalize on technologies that allow us to have better reliability, less materials coming into our facilities, and utilize technology to basically make more with less. I think that that's a trend that we're going to continue to see across the board. Our next question comes from the line of David Begleiter with Deutsche Bank. Please proceed with your question. Thank you. Peter, just on Polyurethanes, you mentioned that 54% of the EBITDA today is from that segment. Can you talk about how much of that is now downstream or differentiated EBITDA versus commodity EBITDA, and how does that compare to a number of years ago? Well, I think as we look at that commodity versus downstream, I'm a bit hesitant to give an exact number on that because not everything fits exactly in those two buckets. I would look to Tony Hankins here and say we're probably looking at somewhere between two-thirds to probably closer to three-quarters of our EBITDAs being earned by our differentiated products. Tony, you see that? The Patriot splitter investment's really going to help us move that even further downstream. In China, I'd say it was about 50/50 in China. That's the area we've got to do more work in to really start converting more of that component where we see the spikes and the flyups into more downstream stable end uses. Yeah, overall, Peter, about 70%, 75%. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of John Roberts with UBS. Please proceed with your question. Thank you. Back to the Performance Products segment, Peter. Vegetable oil is also used in unsaturated polyester, sort of a different chemical route to some of the products. Is the surge in vegetable oil contributing to the support of pricing there on maleic? No, not that we're saying that. Vegetable oil is a product that we follow very closely, and we look at the alternative technologies and usage in those areas. I don't see it having any impact at this time. You talked about some constraints in PU foam volume there. Is it your propylene oxide supply from Indorama, or was it blowing agents or some other additive that might be constraining the PU foams? Tony, you want to comment on that? Yeah, John, I think it's a wide range of raw materials. Polyether polyols have been constrained, particularly in North America this past quarter, but also catalysts, blowing agents, release agents. Right across the board, I think raw materials have been very tight, and particularly things like butanediol, which go into the TPU business. We're hopeful that's going to get a lot better in the second half. Yes, particularly in our Huntsman Building Solutions business, it's been very restrictive of our ability to really capitalize on the strong growth. We're working hard to alleviate that with alternative products and remixing of chemistry. Peter, the MDI prices in China were pretty volatile in 2Q, and I know the U.S. and Europe was a little more stable. You were able to hit your outlook for Polyurethanes. Given the volatility, why do you think that was the case? Have you done enough in that portfolio to be able to manage the volatility in component pricing. Any thoughts on any new industry capacity coming on in 2022? Just if you have any insight there. Thanks. Yeah, very quickly, if I'm rather quick in my answers, I'd like to try to get as many questions as possible. On the Chinese polymeric MDI, it remains volatile. I wish we had a crystal ball that could see into the quarter and see where that price is. I would remind you that PMDI is only 5% of all of Huntsman's portfolio, and it's only 10% of Polyurethanes. If we're getting it right, I think it's more that we're getting the other 90% right, and maybe that other 10%, I'd like to think we're getting it right. We try to be as transparent with the market. As soon as we see something, we try to pass that on to the market. On capacities coming on MDI site anywhere in the world, you're looking at four to five years to be able to build such a site. There isn't any even in its planning and permitting stage at this point. Again, there are some expansions taking place on existing facilities and so forth, but I don't see any significant capacity coming on in MDI for the foreseeable future. When I say foreseeable future, I mean over the course of the next several years. Next question, please. Our next question comes from P.J. Juvekar with Citi. Please proceed with your question. Hi, Peter. It's Eric Petrie for P.J. If I annualize first half Performance Products EBITDA, I get $300 million versus normalized with $200 million-$225 million that you've put out there. Is that level sustainable, or do you see kind of normalization in the composites area? On Performance Products. Yes I see a little bit of seasonality. Third quarter is probably going to be down a bit from the second quarter. $5 million-$7 million down from the second quarter just because of some of the seasonality and turnaround that we have. By and large, I see it moving and second half's going to be a little bit weaker than first half, but not materially. Our next question comes from the line of Arun Viswanathan with RBC. Please proceed with your question. Great. Thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to get your thoughts on reliability. Obviously, we've had some force majeure here and production disruptions at some of your competitor facilities. I guess, do you view that positively? I guess, any comment on your own system? Obviously, there's maintenance going on, but do you expect kind of continued disruptions in the industry going forward? Thanks. I would never wish disruption on any of our competitors. Having said that, I think that when you look at the configuration in this industry of the size of some of these lines that have been built, 400,000 tons sort of lines. It used to be when a line went down, you were losing 50 or 100,000 tons of material. Lines in MDI line to go down, you need a very small amount of contaminants to get into that system to put a line down. When you see a single line now of three, four, 500,000 metric tons, and a line of that magnitude comes down for maintenance or cleaning, you are going to see it impact literally the global balance. I think that's a factor. The other factor that I would see is that as you look at most of these MDI plants, I think of our competitors, I think are very well-built. They're very well operated. They're very well maintained. They're also dependent on infrastructure that in many cases around the world is strained. It's older. I look at a lot of the chemical infrastructure here in North America. Much of it, you get these brand-new billion-dollar facilities, and they're being operated with an infrastructure that's 30 or 40 years old. It's not just the facilities themselves, but a lot of it is when you see a storm come through, freeze come through, something of that nature. You're looking a lot at third-party issues. I look at the outage that we suffered in the second quarter due to the Netherlands was a product pipeline that suffered corrosion that supplied a supplier to a supplier to us. You're kind of like three times removed of an older pipeline that had some corrosion, unexpected corrosion in it. I think that as you look at it as more of an interchangeable and an interconnected industry, I think if anything, I'm not sure that really gets better. I think we're just going to have maintenance is going to continue to be paramount. Our next question comes from the line of Aleksey Yefremov with KeyBanc. Please proceed with your question. Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Peter, do you expect typical seasonality in the fourth quarter in Polyurethanes and Advanced Materials? Given the trends you just discussed, do we see maybe flat Q4 versus Q3? Yes, I do see seasonality. There will be the typical closures. Every year, for some reason, we have this phenomenon called Thanksgiving and Christmas and New Year's that seemingly slow things down. Yes, we will see that. I do, though, think that my only point in saying that I'm optimistic on the fourth quarter is I think that some of that seasonality will be offset by a slowdown in demand, and that's just something that will happen. Our next question comes from the line of Matthew Blair with Tudor, Pickering, Holt. Please proceed with your questions. Hey, good morning, Peter and Phil. You had a press release during the quarter that highlighted your increasing exposure to EV batteries. I was hoping you could just talk about what is your content per vehicle, I guess, in terms of pounds for a traditional ICE vehicle, and then what would you target for an EV? How much of a difference do you think there'll be? Well, the vast majority of what we're putting in an ICE vehicle today will be in an EV vehicle going forward. Think about lightweighting in both is of paramount importance. Comfort, insulation. You want to make sure that you're driving a car that has MDI seats, not TDI, that has low or no VOCs in its catalyst. I'm just trying to promote Tony's products here. As you think about what we can be doing here on an EV that does not go into an ICE vehicle, you're going to see areas of the carbonates that go into the batteries themselves. You're going to see even a greater emphasis, I believe, on lightweighting, on the heat insulation around batteries. I think that's going to be Huntsman material. As we look kind of in that further past the next two or three years, take a look at the video that we just released on our MIRALON product, that's on our website and on social media sites. There's some really exciting materials that are going to be coming out, not only from Huntsman, but from our industry, that will be doing a better job in lightweighting, in adhesion, in structural strength, and so forth, stuff that isn't even on the market. I'm not talking 10 or 20 years down the road. I'm talking two or three years down the road. That I think are going to revolutionize a lot and will increase not only the battery functionality in an EV, but also in existing ICE vehicles as well. Our next question comes from the line of Laurence Alexander with Jefferies. Please proceed with your question. Just two quick ones. Do you expect your own maintenance costs to go up as a percentage of sales or assets over the next few years? Have you pulled forward any productivity from 2022, 2023, or should you be able to maintain the same productivity run rate? I think on both those, Laurence, we think that the maintenance costs that we have had traditionally over the last 10 years will be consistent over the course of the next couple of years. We'll be discussing this in more detail as we get into our investor day and so forth. As we sell off more and more of our heavy chemicals and you're maintaining more system houses and our spray foam facilities and so on, we obviously spend, I think, very generously in that area, maintenance, but you just don't have the high cost that you do on some of these larger facilities that we used to have. As we look at our productivity, as we look at our maintenance and so forth, I think it's well-balanced, and I think it's going to continue as it has been over the course of the last decade. We're going to continue to be very disciplined in our CapEx, and we're going to be calibrating that CapEx around our projected EBITDA. We're not going to be cutting any of our maintenance and our requirements in E H&S. As we look at that 40% threshold is a very important number for us, and there might be some projects that we delay, some expansion business projects that we delay, because I think hitting that number and maintaining that sort of discipline is very important to this company. Operator, I see that we're at the top of the hour. Why don't we take one more question here? Again, I want to thank everybody for having taken the time to join us. Thank you. Our final question comes from the line of Mike Harrison with Seaport Research. Please proceed with your question. Hi, good morning. Thanks for squeezing me in. Peter, can you maybe give a little more color on the strategic refresh that you referred to in the Performance Products segment? What changes have you made in addition to the $7 million of cost takeout that you completed, and what gives you confidence that you're going to see sustained improvement in that business? Thanks. Well, I think we're spending a lot of money, and we have a very good product pipeline in that area. If you were to look at this business five years ago, you would have seen a very heavy focus on our surfactants business, a lot of our crop protection businesses and so forth. This would have been because of the business that we sold two years ago, coming up on two years here, to Indorama, where that business was largely integrated with an upstream ethane to ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and we were taking those molecules, and I think moving those into more of a commoditized market, though that rewarded us for volume over value per pound. Now that those are standalone businesses, we're looking at the molecules, we're looking at the technology, and we're looking as to how do we achieve through less volume, more value. I think that's going to continue. As we look at the strength of our maleic anhydride business, not just the integration going into UPR, but in other areas as a fuel additive, a lube oil protective agent and so forth, that maleic business is going to continue to be of value to us. As we look in our amines and we start focusing, as we mentioned earlier, into a whole new area of semiconductors, into batteries and electricity and into polyurethane catalysts. Again, remember, these are the products that are fueling the growth that we are seeing in the spray foam business on the polyurethane side. This is an interdivisional supply channel that we have here, and we see a tremendous opportunity to help grow that business at a very strong double-digit growth rate here over the course of the next couple of years. As we see that, I guess my point is we're focused more on value on a per pound basis. We're focused more on where we're going to be having perhaps a little bit smaller, nimbler business than where we were a couple of years ago when we were moving mass commoditization through surfactants and so forth. Not that those are bad markets. We're just, I think, better focused on pricing, technology, and execution. I think that we're starting to see the benefit of that coming through. Thank you very much.