Welcome, and thank you for standing by. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Today's conference is being recorded. If you have any objections, you may disconnect at this time. Now, I will turn the meeting over to Ms. Patricia Murphy with IBM. Ma'am, you may begin. Thank you. This is Patricia Murphy, and I'd like to welcome you to IBM's Second Quarter 2022 Earnings Presentation. I'm here with Arvind Krishna, IBM's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Jim Kavanaugh, IBM's Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. We'll post today's prepared remarks on the IBM investor website within a couple of hours, and a replay will be available by this time tomorrow. To provide additional information to our investors, our presentation includes non-GAAP measures. For example, all of our references to revenue and signings growth are at constant currency. We have provided reconciliation charts for these and other non-GAAP measures at the end of the presentation and in the 8-K submitted to the SEC. Finally, some comments made in this presentation may be considered forward-looking under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements involve factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially. Additional information about these factors is included in the company's SEC filings. With that, I'll turn the call over to Arvind. Thank you for joining us today. In the second quarter, we drove solid results reflecting the investments and changes we have been making to execute our strategy. With this performance, we continue to deliver on our model of mid-single-digit revenue growth. Technology plays an important role in today's business environment. In fact, nearly every client I speak to believes that technology serves as a fundamental source of competitive advantage. It serves as both a differentiate force and a force multiplier and is especially critical as clients face challenges on multiple fronts, from supply chain bottlenecks to demographic shifts. Given its ability to boost innovation, productivity, resilience, and help organizations scale, IT has become a high priority in a company's budget. As such, there is every reason to believe technology spending in the B2B space will continue to surpass GDP growth. With this demand backdrop, we are executing our hybrid cloud and AI strategy. We have made changes to our portfolio and focused investments in our offerings, technical talent, our ecosystem, and go-to-market model. Demand for our solutions remains strong. We continue to have double-digit performance in IBM Consulting, broad-based trend in software, and with the z16 platform launch, our infrastructure business had a good quarter. By integrating technology and expertise from IBM and our partners, our clients will continue to see our hybrid cloud and AI solutions as a crucial source of business opportunity and growth. Let me now delve a little bit deeper into the progress in the execution of our hybrid cloud and AI strategy. Hybrid cloud is about offering clients a platform that can straddle multiple public clouds, private clouds, and on-premise properties all the way to the edge. Our platform, based on Red Hat, allows our clients to consume powerful software capabilities driven by open source innovation. Our software has been optimized to run on that platform and includes advanced data and AI, automation, and the security capabilities our clients need. Our global team of consultants offers deep business expertise and co-creates with clients to accelerate their digital transformation journeys. Our infrastructure allows clients to take full advantage of an extended hybrid cloud environment. As a testament to the success of our strategy, we continue to increase adoption of our platform with over 4,000 hybrid cloud platform clients, including more than 250 added in this past quarter alone. Apart from working with a greater number of clients, those who adopt our platform tend to consume more of our solutions across software, consulting, and infrastructure, expanding our footprint within those clients. Recently, clients such as PNC, Barclays, and Citi have chosen our hybrid cloud capabilities to unlock more business value and meet rapidly changing client demands. Organizations everywhere are also under intense pressure to fast-track their digital transformation and harness the power of the data. With the world now creating 2.5 quintillion bytes of data each day, artificial intelligence or AI is the only way to process this enormous amount of data from hybrid cloud environments all the way to the edge. That is why AI adoption is steadily on the rise. According to a new study released by IBM last quarter, 35% of companies are now using some form of AI in their business. Many of those companies are using AI and automation to address demographic shifts and move their employees to higher value work. This is one of the many reasons we are investing heavily in both AI and automation. These investments are paying off. In addition to the strong revenue performance in automation and data and AI software, we recently received two important recognitions. We were named as a leader in the latest Gartner Magic Quadrant for APM and Observability, and in the Forrester Data Fabric Wave for our Cloud Pak for Data. Over the last several quarters, I've highlighted the importance of the growing ecosystem of partners to our platform-centric strategy with leading firms like SAP, Salesforce, Adobe, Oracle, Microsoft, and AWS. This quarter, we continue to expand and extend our partnerships. I'll expand on just two. We announced a strategic collaboration agreement with AWS to offer a broad array of our software catalog on AWS. This includes capabilities that span automation, data and AI, security, and sustainability. Second, with Tech Mahindra, we launched Synergy Lounge to empower businesses with the innovation technologies and services for key industries such as telecommunications, manufacturing, banking, healthcare, energy, and utilities. The first Synergy Lounge was established in Bengaluru with a focus on edge, 5G, and software-defined networking solutions with hybrid cloud. This will be followed by the opening of three more centers in London, Seattle, and Melbourne. Clients aren't just simply buying software or hardware. They're entering a relationship with a company that's going to help them navigate the future of technology. This is why innovation and our ability to invent what's next remains so important. Quantum is a great example of our commitment to advance the future of technology. Building on our progress of 127-qubit quantum computer currently in our cloud, we have committed to demonstrate the first 400+ qubit system before year-end. This will help us move forward towards a roadmap to deliver a 1,000+ qubit system next year and a 4,000+ qubit system in 2025. One of the implications of quantum computing will be the need to change how information is encrypted. We are proud that technology developed by IBM and our collaborators has been selected by NIST as the basis of the next generation of quantum safe encryption protocols. In another example of innovation, our new z16 system became generally available in the second quarter. The z16 is designed for cloud native development, cybersecurity resilience, quantum safe encryption, and includes an on-chip accelerator, which allows clients to reduce fraud within real-time transactions. Given the importance of cybersecurity, in this past quarter, we also acquired Randori, a leading attack surface management and offensive cybersecurity provider. This builds on the recent acquisition of ReaQta and the launch of QRadar XDR. It's one of two acquisitions in the second quarter and over 25 in the last two years. Another major focus area across all stakeholders is ESG, which isn't just a regulatory requirement or about being a good corporate citizen, it's also a business opportunity. A poll conducted by the IBM Institute for Business Value shows that 50% of CEOs see sustainability as one of their highest priorities, and over 80% of CEOs believe their company sustainability investments will improve business results and accelerate growth. To accomplish this, companies need to leverage AI to turn the mountains of data they collect into sustainable action. SL Green Realty Corp., Manhattan's largest office landlord, is a recent example. They are using Envizi, an IBM solution, to manage their ESG indicators across their extensive real estate operations, including energy use, carbon emissions, and environmental and social responsibility metrics. Let me wrap up by saying that given the strength of our portfolio, the need for our technology and expertise, with the benefits we're yielding from our many actions, we remain confident in our ability to deliver revenue in 2022 at the high-end of our mid-single-digit model. Now, let me hand it over to Jim, who will give you more detail on our second quarter performance and add color on our expectations for the balance of the year. Thanks, Arvind. I'll get right into the financial highlights. In the second quarter, we delivered $15.5 billion in revenue, $2.5 billion of operating pre-tax income, which is a margin of 16.2%, and operating earnings per share of $2.31. In the first half of the year, we generated $3.3 billion of free cash flow. Our revenue was up 16%. This includes nearly 5 points of incremental revenue from Kyndryl. As always, we discuss revenue growth at constant currency. Given the focus on the sharply strengthening dollar, I'll mention that currency translation impacted our reported revenue by over 6 points of growth or $900 million. That's over $200 million more than the spot rates would have suggested 90 days ago. Today's IBM has a higher growth profile driven by our growth factors of software and consulting. More than half of our annual revenue is recurring, with about 2/3 of that in high-value software. Software revenue this past quarter was up 12% and consulting up 18%. Infrastructure performance, which reflects a good start to our z16 product cycle, was up 25%. Software and infrastructure each include about 7 points of growth from the commercial relationship with Kyndryl. These results reflect the investments we've been making in innovation, our ecosystem, and talent, all aligned to our strategic areas of hybrid cloud and AI. We integrate consulting and technology to deliver these hybrid cloud and AI solutions. Our platform approach not only benefits our clients, but also provides an attractive economic model for IBM and our partners, with a multiple of software and consulting revenue generated for every dollar of platform revenue. Our hybrid cloud revenue from our full stack capabilities across software, consulting, and infrastructure was up 19% over the last year. It has grown to $21.7 billion or 36% of our total revenue. Looking at our P&L metrics, operating gross profit dollars were up, driven by strong revenue performance in our high-value businesses. Our year-to-year gross margin decline reflects escalating labor and component costs. We're addressing this through pricing, though it takes some time to show up in our margin profile, especially in consulting. Our operating pre-tax income was up, and we expanded margin by 420 basis points. We had an operating tax rate of about 16.5%, which is up about 2 points versus last year, and our operating net income margin expanded 330 basis points. Let me comment on a few dynamics within our profit performance. Our pre-tax profit reflects the benefit from actions we've taken to streamline our operations and simplify our go-to-market model, as well as profit contribution from incremental sales for the new commercial relationship post-separation. Our profit this quarter also reflects recent portfolio actions. At the end of June, we closed on the divestiture of our healthcare software assets, generating a pre-tax gain of about $230 million in the period. Mitigating that benefit to our overall profit results, we took charges to address stranded costs associated with the divestiture and absorbed operating losses related to the health business. Together, over $75 million. We also announced the orderly wind down of our Russian operations, resulting in incremental charges in the quarter. Together with the year-to-year loss business due to the wind down, Russia impacted our profit results by another roughly $100 million. I also want to comment on the impact of currency. I mentioned that over the last 90 days, we've dealt with a sharply strengthening dollar. We execute hedge programs that cover the majority, but not all of the currency exposure. The combination of the rate and velocity of movement this quarter and the fact that we don't hedge 100% results in a currency impact to our profit and cash flow. Turning to free cash flow, we generated over $2 billion in the quarter and $3.3 billion for the first half, with good working capital performance. This first half free cash flow is about 33% of our full year expected range, consistent with the average of the last few years. I'll remind you the billion-dollar plus of proceeds from the health divestiture is reflected in cash from investing activities versus in our free cash flow. In terms of uses of cash for the first half, we invested nearly $1 billion in acquisitions with five closed this year, and we returned $3 billion to shareholders in the form of dividends. This results in a June cash position of nearly $8 billion, which is up slightly from year-end. Our debt of just over $50 billion is down about $1.5 billion over the same period. Turning to the segments, software revenue grew 12%. This includes about 7 points from the Kyndryl software content. Growth was driven by our hybrid cloud and AI capabilities. Hybrid cloud revenue for the segment now represents $9 billion over the last year, up 23%. Software subscription and support renewal rates were up again this quarter. This contributes to our solid and growing recurring revenue base, which represents about 80% of software. From a revenue category perspective, our software growth vector of hybrid platform and solutions grew 9%. This includes about a 1.5-point benefit from the Kyndryl commercial relationship. We again drove pervasive growth across Red Hat, automation, data and AI, and security. Red Hat revenue all in grew 17%. Revenue growth was fueled by new adoption and expansion of RHEL and OpenShift, as both solutions continued to take share. These key offerings address hybrid cloud requirements in industries like financial services, public sector and telecommunications across environments and out to the edge. Automation revenue was up 8%. Solid performance in both AIOps and management and integration demonstrates the importance of automation in the IT journeys of our clients. We had strengthened offerings like Turbonomic and Instana for observability, Cloud Pak for Watson AIOps, and our modern integration platform, Cloud Pak for Integration. Data and AI revenue grew 4%. This growth was led by demand for Data Fabric, data management, and asset and supply chain management solutions. We also just expanded our Data Fabric portfolio with the acquisition of Databand.ai, which helps organizations with data observability. Security revenue was up 5%, with growth in threat management and identity as enterprises continue to adopt a zero trust security strategy and implement additional identity controls. We're continuing to invest in our security capabilities, having completed two acquisitions in the threat management space over the last few quarters. Across the four hybrid platform and solution business areas, our annual recurring revenue, or ARR, is nearly $12.9 billion, up 8%. Turning to our software value vector, transaction processing, revenue grew 19%, including 22 points from the Kyndryl contribution. We continue to have strong renewal rates for this mission-critical software and performed in line with our expectations this quarter. Looking at software profit, we delivered operating leverage given the solid revenue growth and new Kyndryl commercial relationship. Our pre-tax margin was up 4 points and keeps us on track for a full-year software margin in the mid-20s. Moving on to consulting, we again saw pervasive growth with double-digit revenue growth across all business lines and geographies. Revenue was up 18% compared to 8% growth a year ago. We maintain a solid book-to-bill ratio of 1.1 on a trailing 12-month basis, as clients are choosing to co-create with IBM, trusting our deep industry expertise. The expansion of our skills, capabilities, and ecosystems are enabling us to capture demand as we drive adoption of our hybrid cloud platform and help clients with their digital transformations. Consulting's hybrid cloud revenue grew 32% over the last year to $8.6 billion. Momentum behind our Red Hat practice remains strong. We nearly doubled our Red Hat consulting revenue in the quarter and continued solid Red Hat bookings, which now exceed $6 billion inception to date. Our strategic partnerships also contributed to our performance in the quarter. Revenue from these partnerships continue to grow solid double digits, led by Azure, AWS, SAP, and Salesforce. Turning to our lines of business transformation grew 16%. Its clients look to IBM to help them transform critical workflows at scale. Growth in business transformation was pervasive and led by our offerings focused on customer experience transformation, data transformation, and our SAP practices. In technology consulting, where we architect and implement clients' cloud platforms and strategies, revenue was up 23%. Cloud modernization and cloud application development led a significant portion of the growth, with on-prem modernization also contributing to the strong revenue performance in the quarter. Application operations revenue grew 17%. Growth was solid across our cloud offerings, mitigated by declines in the on-prem space. In this business, we are optimizing the management of applications and providing cloud platform services required to run our clients' hybrid cloud environments. Moving to consulting profit, our pre-tax margin expanded a point as we deliver operating leverage and benefit from IBM's more streamlined G&A and go-to-market structure. Our consulting margins reflect the significant investments we have been making to capture demand and fuel our revenue growth. We continue to invest in our partner ecosystem, scale acquisitions, and add skills. Consulting, which makes up well over half of IBM's workforce, is most impacted by the inflationary labor market and increasing labor costs as we bring and increase capacity. We are starting to capture the reality of these higher costs in our pricing. Given the time from contract signing to revenue realization, it's taking some time to see it in our margins. Turning to the infrastructure segment, revenue was up 25%, including about 7 points from the incremental Kyndryl content. Hybrid infrastructure revenue grew 41% and infrastructure support revenue grew 5%, including about 7 and 8 points of Kyndryl benefit respectively. Within hybrid infrastructure, IBM Z revenue was up 77%. This reflects solid execution around our z16 program, building on the momentum from z15. As Arvind mentioned, z16 brings the power of embedded AI at scale, cyber resilience security and cloud native development for hybrid cloud to our clients. We are seeing growth in new workloads like Linux and demand for AI capabilities like real-time fraud detection, leveraging the on-chip AI accelerator. Clients are investing in IBM Z platform as an essential part of their hybrid cloud infrastructure. Distributed infrastructure revenue grew 17% this quarter. This growth was led by storage, driven by both high-end storage tied to the z16 cycle and distributed storage. We also had good performance in high-end Power10. Just last week, we announced the expansion of our Power10 server family as we deliver flexible and secure infrastructure for hybrid cloud environments. Looking at infrastructure profit, pre-tax margin was up four points year to year, reflecting mixed benefits from the growth in IBM Z, mitigated by the impact of increased component costs and supplier premiums. Now let me take it back up to the IBM level. We've taken actions and made investments over the last couple of years to execute a platform-centric hybrid cloud and AI strategy. IBM is now a more focused, faster-growing, and higher value company. While there is always more work to do, we are confident in our ability to deliver sustainable growth. Our first half results were solid. We continue to see constant currency revenue growth at the high end of the mid-single digit model for the full year. On top of that, we expect about 3.5 points of growth from the Kyndryl sales spread over the first three quarters. I mentioned the impact of currency to our 2Q results. With the significant movement of the U.S. dollar as compared to nearly every currency, at mid-July spot rates, currency translation will now be about a 6-point headwind to revenue growth for the year. That's a degradation of about $1.5 billion from April's rates, with most of that incremental impact still ahead of us in the second half. Currency is one unique issue we're dealing with. The other is the impact of exiting our Russia operation. Together, these are putting some pressure on our near-term results, and we now expect free cash flow of about $10 billion for the year. These are exogenous issues. Importantly, we feel good about the underlying fundamentals of our business. You see this in our segment expectations. Halfway through the year, there's no change to our full year view of software. We continue to expect constant currency revenue growth in line with our mid-single-digit model range, plus 5-6 points from sales to Kyndryl. We also remain on track to a software pre-tax margin in the mid-20s range for 2022. Our IBM Consulting revenue growth has been strong, and we continue to expect low double-digit revenue growth rate for the year, which is above our model. With continued investment in skills and a competitive labor environment, we now expect a consulting pre-tax margin of 9%-10%, which is up over a point year-over-year. This reflects improving margin performance in the second half as we increase utilization of the resources we've added and price realization starts to flow to revenue. Our infrastructure revenue in any period reflects product cycle dynamics. We had a very strong launch of our z16 platform in the second quarter. This will drive infrastructure revenue performance above the model level for the year. On top of that, we're planning for about 5-6 points of revenue growth from the sales to Kyndryl in 2022. Despite some of the pressures from component cost increases and supplier premiums, we continue to see mid- to high-teens pre-tax margin for infrastructure for the full year. These segment revenue and margin dynamics yield about a 3.5-point year-to-year improvement in IBM's pre-tax margin for the full year. We continue to expect a mid- to high-teens operating tax rate, which is a headwind to our profit growth. You'll recall that back in January, we expected a 40-60 first half, second half profit skew. Now, after a solid start to the year, our view hasn't changed. We still see 60% of the full year profit in the second half. Looking at the third quarter, we expect all-in constant-currency revenue growth in the high single-digit range and about a 2-point year-to-year improvement in operating pre-tax margin. I wanna mention two specific items on the third quarter. First, at current spot rates, currency translation has increased to about an 8-point headwind to revenue growth, impacting our reported revenue, profit, and cash. Second, we haven't had an IBM Z product introduction in our large transactional second quarter in about 20 years. This unique timing, coupled with the strong start to the cycle, will result in a larger second to third quarter impact than typical seasonality. Though to be clear, we expect a strong year-to-year growth in IBM Z. In closing, these are interesting times, and we see technology as a way to help our enterprise clients capture today's opportunities and navigate challenges. We feel good about the strategy we are executing and the fundamentals of our business. Patricia, now let's go on to the Q&A. Thank you, Jim. Before we begin the Q&A, I'd like to mention a couple of items. First, supplemental information is provided at the end of the presentation. Second, as always, I'd ask you to refrain from multi-part questions. Operator, let's please open it up for questions. Thank you. At this time, we'll begin the question-and-answer session of the conference. To ask a question, please press star one and record your name clearly. If you need to withdraw your question, press star two. Again, to ask a question, please press star one. Our first question will come from Erik Woodring with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Hey, good afternoon, guys. Thank you for taking my question. Just one for me here. Obviously, we saw a bit of a deceleration in the Red Hat business, so would just love to hear what you're hearing from them and any impact that you could share with us on the deferred, you know, that's been a part of this business for a while. That's it. Thanks. Thank you, Erik, for the question. Let me start off by just we feel very good about the Red Hat business, and we see very strong demand continuing. That said, we had said late last year that we expect growth in Red Hat to be in the upper teens. We continue to make that expectation is what we are gonna continue with. Erik, I think I heard you start to say deferred revenue. That accounts for the bulk of what has been the difference in the growth rates in coming down from last year to this year, and I'll let Jim add a bit of color onto that. Yeah. Erik, thanks. You know, just building on what Arvind said, 17% growth overall, taking share both in our core RHEL, but also in our hybrid cloud platform-centric foundation, Red Hat OpenShift. By the way, Red Hat OpenShift, 4.5 x now the revenue pre-acquisition. We had very strong bookings overall in Red Hat here in the quarter. Large deals were up 50%. Red Hat OpenShift bookings were up over 50%, which positions us very well with our backlog and a strong NRR. So we feel pretty good about our Red Hat portfolio overall. Arvind indicated our model is high teens. We delivered on that in the quarter. By the way, the deferred revenue we talked about entering January this year, that was gonna lessen throughout the year, and we're pretty much through that. I mean, there's some small round up here in the third quarter, but that's pretty much behind us. Remember, we're three years into this acquisition right now, and we couldn't be more pleased as we move forward. Thank you, Erik. Let's go to the next question, please. Our next question will come from Amit Daryanani with Evercore. Your line is open. Yep. Thanks for taking my question. You know, I guess, Jim, my question is really on the free cash flow guide, and, you know, one of the things that always comes up is, or at least when I look at the numbers right there, you know, revenue seems to be doing better than what most folks thought they would 90 days ago, or even at the start of the year, even. But the free cash flow number, I think, you know, is $10 billion at this point. It was $10 billion-$10.5 billion initially. Maybe just talk about what are the puts and takes you're seeing on free cash flow, because that would be helpful to kind of understand. Then maybe just related to that, you've been very explicit on the FX headwinds on your top line. I'm assuming given how volatile this movement was, there might be an impact to your EPS and free cash flow. Maybe just flush out puts and takes on free cash flow and how is FX impacting, you know, things below the top line. That would be helpful. Thank you. Yes, Amit, thank you very much. Let's take a moment to go through this because I think it's very important. When you look at our two key measures of success, you talked about it, revenue growth Arvind's put in place to run this company and free cash flow growth. You know, we started out the year guiding at $10 billion-$10.5 billion, and now coming through the first half, we have now moved it to the low end of that guidance at about $10 billion. Before I get into the puts and takes at the heart of your question, let's take a step back and put this into perspective. That $10 billion of free cash flow is growing $3.5 billion year-over-year. It's even growing north of $2 billion against our 2021 IBM post-separation baseline that we gave to all of our investors. Remember, we're very transparent on the revenue growth of the Kyndryl contribution, and we have given each of you the pro forma baseline. In either case, that is very strong free cash flow growth overall. There's two pieces that I talked about in the summary of the prepared remarks. Number one, given the unfortunate humanitarian crisis and the war in Russia, we made the right decision to exit that business here in the second quarter, and that was a very highly profitable business for us, and that's gonna cost a couple hundred million dollars worth of free cash flow and profit, by the way, in 2022. The second is what's been happening with the rate and pace of the U.S. dollar appreciation. That right now we are not immune to that as we move forward. Let me talk a little bit about the go forward free cash flow. You know, we achieved $3.3 billion through the first half. That is actually slightly above our historical attainment over the last five years. When we look at the second half, we see continued revenue growth. We see continued operating leverage out of our business. We've had good performance out of working capital management here through the first half and given the volume dynamics and now our mainframe cycle, which we got off to a good start, should provide leverage. Then as I talked about in January, we do have a modest cash tax headwind or excuse me, tailwind, for the year. That kinda wraps up free cash flow overall. Okay, thank you, Amit. Let's go to the next question, please. Our next question will come from Toni Sacconaghi with Bernstein. Your line is open. Yes, thank you. I was wondering if you could just comment on whether you still expect $35 billion in free cash flow through 2024 and what the bridge for that is. You mentioned that revenue sequentially would be a little lighter than usual in Q3 because of the mainframe. I think you're typically down about $850 million. The mainframe's like, you know, $500 million-$700 million a quarter, so maybe it's a $100 million headwind. Is that sort of the dimension that you're thinking about for Q3, or are there other factors at work? Thank you. Hi, Toni. Let me start by first addressing the $35 billion free cash flow question, and then I'll hand it to Jim. We are absolutely committed to our $35 billion total free cash flow cumulative over 2022 through 2024. We still see very good signs, and we have confidence in delivering that number. With that, you said the bridge to that and then the 2Q to 3Q dynamics. I'll hand it to Jim for those. Yes. Thanks, Toni. If you go back to what I said in the prepared remarks, you know, we typically I think the number is actually about $1 billion sequentially in revenue, Toni, overall. We've actually given pretty explicit guidance on third quarter. We said that we were going to be all in high single digit at constant currency here in the second quarter. Let me address your question from that dynamic because we've given that explicit, quarter to quarter and what's gonna happen to, Constant Currency total revenue. If you look at second quarter, we delivered mid-teens. By the way, I would make the point, that is the strongest constant currency growth that we've had in 20 years in this company, well above our mid-single digit model and an acceleration from second quarter. By the way, acceleration in revenue growth, acceleration in operating profit margin up 420 basis points and acceleration in free cash flow. If you look at constant currency, we're going from mid-teens in second quarter to high single digit. Let me call that 9%-10%. That's about six points worth of what I'll call quote-unquote deceleration. 2 points right off the bat is coming from our healthcare software asset divestiture. We closed that at the end of June. That's about $200 million a quarter. That's 2 points of the 6. The remaining 4 points is the dynamic of us for the first time in 20 years, coming out with a new mainframe cycle in a highly seasonal transactional quarter of second quarter. We did extremely well. Remember, 90 days ago, we took up our second quarter revenue guidance by $200 million versus the normal seasonality. We actually beat that in the second quarter. Now, when you look at second half and get into third quarter, I think it's imprudent in this environment for us only to guide at what a normal cycle would be. Given the normal cycle, that's gonna cost us about 4 points in a 2Q to 3Q, given the announcement in second quarter. I'll wrap it up just saying that, Toni, I talked about upfront that we still see 40%-60% skew in our operating profit from the year. That hasn't changed since January. This is really a dynamic between a third quarter and a fourth quarter now, given how we announced the new Z cycle, which we're very excited about here in the second half. Thank you, Toni. Sheila, let's please go to the next question. Our next question comes from Wamsi Mohan with Bank of America. Your line is open. Hi, yes, thank you. Arvind, I know you left your constant currency guide unchanged for the year, but it'd be helpful to get some color maybe on what is tracking a bit better or worse versus your expectations. If I could, Jim, can you help sort through the PTI change year-over-year in the second half of the year? It seems like, you know, you had significant improvement in PTI, 400+ basis points in the second quarter. You're guiding to about 200 basis points in the third quarter. Does it mean that there is a catch-up of sort of PTI in the fourth quarter, or is this. And how much of that is FX versus mainframe timing related? Because you alluded to both of those when you were talking about the revenue impact. Thank you. Great. Wamsi, let me address the first part of your question. We had very balanced performance in constant currency across geographies and actually across the different businesses. Now because of currency, the actual performance will be different in different geographies, but double digit performance in the Americas, in Europe, as well as in Asia Pacific. Jim laid out the numbers on the different business performances. He talked about at constant currency, 12% in software, 18% in consulting, 19% in infrastructure. Those are really strong performances, I believe. As we go forward, you should expect to see us maintain, and we said, we talked about we'll remain in the mid-single digits on software. We will get towards the low end of double digits in consulting, which is actually up from our previous high single digit margin, and infrastructure will benefit from the Z cycle. All in, that's a very balanced across the portfolio and across the geographies, and that then contributes towards our confidence in the revenue profile for the rest of the year. Yeah, Wamsi, thanks for the question. Let me give you know, a step back from an overall perspective, and then I'll come into third quarter. You know, we maintain the guidance to your question about high end of our mid-single-digit revenue growth before the incremental Kyndryl contribution for the year. Arvind just went through the portfolio dynamics of that. By the way, the currency change that now we expect about 6 points impact beyond that constant currency strong performance, that went up from about 3-4 points 90 days ago. That's about $1.5 billion. I've seen some people quoting $3.5 billion. It's about $1.5 billion overall, a change from what we said here in April. With that revenue growth, we expect about $10 billion of free cash flow and operating profit margins up a strong 350 basis points year-over-year. When you look at that by segment, we really haven't changed our software segment. We feel pretty comfortable and confident in our first half trajectory that we're still gonna grow mid-single-digit overall in software, operating margins approaching mid-20s. Remember, that's 5-6 points of an operating margin. Infrastructure segment, we still think given the product cycle dynamics, it will be well in excess of its model, and have operating margins around mid- to high teens. Consulting. We see strong demand in consulting. We took up our model on revenue growth 90 days ago, and now that's low double-digit. Our margin now we took down to 9%-10%. That's the one change that's happening. What we're seeing is it's taking longer for our price optimization to play through to our margin. We still expect margin increase year-over-year for the full year, between that 9%-10% absolute PTI. That will actually be as we lap easier comparisons in the second half, that will be some nice margin accretion here in our consulting business in the second half overall. Now, third quarter. You know, similar to how I answered Toni's question on revenue growth overall, our operating margins are typically flat quarter-over-quarter. When you look at the dynamics of mainframe coming out for the first time in 20 years in a highly seasonal transactional quarter, and you look at then a prudent guidance on a third quarter, that is about a 4-point margin impact. By the way, our third quarter, we guided to be up 2%. When you look at the dynamics, it's entirely even more so driven by the mainframe dynamics. To your question, Wamsi, that comes back to us here in the fourth quarter. We'll just have a very different skew given the new introduction in the second quarter. Thank you, Wamsi. Let's go to the next question. Our next question will come from Brian Essex with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Hi, good afternoon, and thank you for taking the question. Jim, I was wondering if you could. You know, I appreciate the comments on the consulting side of the business. I was wondering if you could dig in a little bit there. You know, I appreciate, you know, kind of the pricing dynamics you discussed, but I think if we look at this from both the demand side and the supply side, could you share any thoughts on what you're seeing, if anything is changing there? From the supply side, you know, hiring, attrition, wage inflation, changing or stabilizing. On demand side, I noticed that, you know, it's great to see the improvement in Constant Currency growth, sequentially. Nice to see the acceleration. It looks like business transformation moderated a little bit while we have improvement in technology consulting and application operations. Maybe if we could walk through, you know, supply dynamics and then demand dynamics to see what's changing within that business and what's driving your confidence in the performance for the rest of the year. Sure, Brian. Thanks for the question. Great question. Let's take a minute here to go through this, right? We continue. I'm gonna start with the demand side of the equation because in a human capital-based business, the way we manage this is our source of cost, our value, ROI indicator is the human capital to go drive that demand and capture it. We continue to see a strong demand profile, and we're capturing it by raising our guidance here and seeing the accelerated consulting performance in the quarter up 18%, by the way, on a +8% last year overall. I think that's driven by what Arvind has been talking about, and that is the value of technology being a sustainable competitive advantage in this environment as clients in every industry are moving and accelerating their digital transformation journey in the cloud. Consulting is also a very integral part to our hybrid cloud platform thesis. I've talked every quarter about being the tip of the spear to drive the scale adoption of our hybrid cloud platform and pull through IBM's technology overall. We saw this, if you remember, looking back a year ago. We were entering second half 2021 in a very different dynamic coming off of the pandemic. I think Arvind was very explicit about the demand indicators that we saw that we were gonna take a conscious strategy to now, on our supply side, to invest in skills and capabilities in ecosystem expansion and in acquisitions because we saw the robust demand growth that was gonna be out there. I think we've been capitalizing on that, growing consistent double digit. By the way, another solid signings quarter with the trailing 12-month book-to-bill north of 1.1, we feel pretty good even as we enter the second half. You take that conscious strategy of driving incremental skill capability capacity on the supply side, and then you couple that with the highly inflationary environment that started to play out in the second half, and you see that that's been impacting our gross profit margins. We talked about as we came into 2022, that we were gonna go take the appropriate actions around our price optimization, but that would take time to roll through our P&L. That's what we kinda expect in the second half of this year. When we look at all-in demand, still see solid. The supply side of the equation, we've been optimized with a very disciplined strategic investment process. When we look at second half, we are looking at one, easier comps. Two, scaling the acquisitive accretion of our acquisitions, where actually we saw some good green shoots here in the second quarter. Three, getting effective increase in utilization of our capacity. Four, price optimization continue to play through. We saw nice improvement in our priced margins that will play out in the second half as we move forward. Hopefully, that gets you a little perspective. Thanks, Brian. Let's go to the next question, please. Our next question will come from Kyle McNealy with Jefferies. Your line is open. Hi. Thanks very much for the question. The strengthening U.S. dollar generally comes with a translation impact, but also some demand destruction in non-U.S. dollar-denominated markets. Are you able to size how much that demand-related impact might be, which would actually make your reiterated guidance for the high end of your mid-single-digit range for the full year for the core look even a bit better? Also connected to that, what is your sense, if you have some perspective on how well international customers are positioned to be able to absorb the currency fluctuations? Thanks. Okay, Kyle. Thank you. I'll take this, Arvind. Let me spend a few minutes on currency since it seems to be a theme here across the questions, and really how we manage it within our business and how it impacts our business model. While we have a robust hedging program, as I indicated earlier, we're not immune over the long term to the currency impacts, especially when currencies move at the rate, breadth, and magnitude that we've seen. Let me give you some stats as we've been going through here in the month of June and the early part of July. One, the U.S. dollar index is up 13% year to date, a 20-year high against the euro, 25-year high against the yen. The velocity of the strengthening, it's the sharpest that we've seen in over a decade, and it's been a broad-based dollar story, as you all know. All the currencies we hedge, over half of them are down double digits against the U.S. dollar this year. So it's kinda, I would say, quote-unquote, "unprecedented" what we've seen in the rate, the breadth, and magnitude. To your question, Kyle, our business profile, we operate in 170 countries around the world. That's in excess of over 100 currencies. The strong dollar definitely has an impact. To your point, from an absolute revenue profile, I would agree with you completely. It even makes our constant currency revenue growth guidance even stronger, and us capturing what's happening in the marketplace with regards to that acceleration of digitization and transformation and journey to cloud. Our robust hedging program, there's two important points I'd like to make. Number one, we don't hedge 100 currencies. One, it's not economically viable, and two, you can't hedge revenue per GAAP accounting. You can only hedge where you have cash proxies in countries. We only hedge, give or take, about 35 currencies around the world out of the 100+ that we're in. Also important, if not more important, we only hedge 12 months out. We don't do multi-year hedging in this business. We're not speculative. When you look at the lasting relevance of a U.S. dollar appreciation, eventually what hedging does is it mitigates volatility in the near term. It does not eliminate currency. It allows you time to address your business model for price, for source, for labor pools, and for cost structures. Now, also important, and this is where you see the dynamics playing out in our business model. Currency impacts a human capital-based business very different than a product-based business. I've talked about this many times over the years. In a human capital-based business, if you think about it, a large portion of your cost structure is a natural hedge 'cause it's in local currency. Very different in a product-based business, where a large portion of your cost structure is U.S. dollar denominated. As the dollar at rate and pace and magnitude appreciates, it has a disproportional impact on our high-value product-based businesses, read that software and infrastructure. You saw that play on the second quarter at the gross margin level. Remember, our hedges end up in expense. Gross margin, you see the revenue and the margin implications. We understand how to manage currency. We have a robust hedging program in place. We've taken the appropriate cost structure and the appropriate pricing as we deal with that going forward, and you see all that taken into account in our guidance. Okay. Thanks, Kyle. Let's see if we can squeeze in two more questions. Sheila, let's go to the next one. Our next question will come from David Grossman with Stifel. Your line is open. Thank you. Could you just remind us whether there are any expenses or stranded costs that remain in the 2022 P&L that will diminish or go away in the next few years? You mentioned Russia had some losses. You mentioned the healthcare software divestiture. I don't know if there are any more. Perhaps beyond that, could you weave that dynamic into how it impacts free cash flow growth the next year or two, given your 2024 target really implies a fairly meaningful increase in free cash conversion over the next two years? Thank you. Yes, David. Thank you very much for the question. You know, at its core, we actually took some conscious strategy back in fourth quarter 2020, if you remember. At the time, we announced the intent to spin off Kyndryl, that we were gonna try to get out in front of stranded costs. As you see now, we've executed on additional portfolio actions with the divestiture and closure of our healthcare software assets across the board. If you look at 2022, there's about $500 million-$600 million, $700 million, give or take in that range, around structural action cash charges that will still impact us. By the way, that's embedded in our about $10 billion overall. Now when you think to the core of your question about how that then plays out for 2023 and 2024, that actually turns into tailwinds in 2023 and 2024 because we're depressed in our free cash flow guidance. Again, I'll remind you, that's up $3.5 billion year-over-year and up over $2 billion against our post-separation baseline. That depresses 2022's free cash flow, and we get that return not only on the cash charges that we won't have in 2023, but also on the incremental ROI of getting rid of that stranded cost as we move forward. Both pieces, it kinda gives you a double benefit as we move forward. Thanks, David. Sheila, let's take one last question, please. Our last question will come from Keith Bachman with BMO. Your line is open. Hi. Many thanks for taking the question. Arvind, I wanted to direct it at you, if I could. I wanted to see if you could look out over the horizon a little bit longer. Some of the software companies have talked about some of the pipelines in a deep sales cycle are starting to extend, and I just wanted to see if you're seeing any economic impact. More specifically, I wanted to see if you could comment. Historically, consulting has been highly correlated to economic cycles, and this is going back last 15, 20 years. I just wanted to see, as we're heading into late 2022 and more importantly, 2023, how do you think the consulting business is prepared for some potential economic downturns or just, you know, more broadly, how do you think about the growth potential there? Jim, if I could just sneak in one thing for you real quick. If you could just talk about what the M&A contribution is this year. You mentioned some, you know, recent deals. Just if you could provide an update, that would be great. Many thanks. Okay. Keith, lots to unpack in that question. If I look at our pipelines, our pipelines are remaining pretty healthy. I would tell you that right now what we are seeing is that the second half at this point looks pretty consistent to the first half when we look at our pipelines, whether it's in Red Hat or mainframe software or automation, data, AI, security, and by geography. This is a little bit different, which is why you've heard me often say I'm a bit more optimistic than many of my peers, both within the industry and across the board, because we see that technology, and Jim has also said this as have I, is deflationary. In an inflationary environment, when clients take our technology, deploy it, leverage our consulting, it acts as a counterbalance to all of the inflation and all of the labor demographics that people are facing all over the globe. So that is the reason on software. Second, on consulting correlated to the economic cycle, and maybe we see much less of that this time around because of the nature of our consulting. If you look at it, a lot of our consulting is around deploying back-office applications, critical applications, supply chain resilience, worrying about cash conversion, worrying about optimization of the costs within our clients. Those tend to get more attention actually in I call it, at least a slight down cycle than not. Third, look, consulting is very labor-based. Jim talked a lot about the demand and the supply. To be completely clear, in a business where you do hire tens of thousands of people because of the scale of it, you do churn in the neighborhood of tens of thousands each year. That gives you an automatic way to hit a pause on some of the profit controls, because if you don't see the demand coming, you're going to slow down your supply side. You get kind of at least a 10%-20% impact that you can pretty quickly control. Not in a given month, but certainly within a half year or thereabout. On M&A, actually, I'll say it before Jim will. We have said that our model is about one to one a half year each year based on M&A. If you look at last year, that was pretty consistent. If you look at this year, look, the year is not over, but you should expect it to stay in that range. It's a mix between consulting acquisitions and software acquisitions, and the multiples that we've been getting them at still imply that range. So I think we'll give you that answer, and we expect it to stay there. Let me wrap up the call. Let me just say, we are very pleased with our solid first half performance. As we look to the second half, we are going to focus on the execution of our strategy, delivering sustained revenue and free cash flow growth. I look forward to speaking with all of you again soon. Sheila, let me turn it back to you to wrap up the call. Thank you. Thank you for participating on today's call. The conference has now ended. You may disconnect at this time.