Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to Intrepid Potash Incorporated Q1 2026 Results Conference Call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press star, then one on your telephone keypad. Should you need assistance during the conference call, you may signal an operator by pressing star and zero. I would now like to turn the conference over to Ryan Schultz, Interim Investor Relations Manager. Please go ahead. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for joining us to discuss and review Intrepid's Q1 2026 results. With me today is Intrepid's CEO, Kevin Crutchfield, our Chief Accounting Officer, Cris Ingold, our VP of Sales and Marketing, Zachry Adams, and our VP of Operations, Rick Kim. Please be advised that comments we will make today include forward-looking statements as defined by U.S. securities laws. These are based upon information available to us today, are subject to risk and uncertainties that are described in the reports we file with the SEC, and could cause our actual results to be different from those currently anticipated, and we assume no obligation to update them. During today's call, we will also refer to certain non-GAAP financial and operational measures. Reconciliations to the most directly comparable GAAP measures are included in today's press release and along with our SEC filings are available at intrepidpotash.com. I'll now turn the call over to our CEO, Kevin Crutchfield. Thank you, Ryan. Good morning, everyone. We appreciate your interest and attendance for today's earnings call. I'm pleased to report that 2026 is off to a strong start with solid Q1 results. Our adjusted net income from continuing operations for the first quarter of $8.2 million and adjusted EBITDA of $19 million is a significant improvement from last year's Q1 adjusted net income of $3.9 million and adjusted EBITDA of $14.6 million. We're looking forward to capitalizing on this momentum for the rest of the year. Our performance is a reflection of the hard work of all of our employees, and I'd like to thank our entire team for their commitment to safety and consistent execution across our core fertilizer business. Our Q1 performance was driven by several factors. First, supportive pricing and resilient demand across our fertilizer products. In the Q1, our average potash net realized sales price was $353 per ton, and our average Trio net realized sales price was $387 per ton. This represents a 13% increase year-over-year for potash, up from $312 a ton, and a 12% increase for Trio, up from $345 per ton. Second, sales volumes remain strong with our second highest quarterly sales total since idling the West Mine in 2016. Combined potash and Trio sales volumes were 211,000 tons in the Q1, with potash sales volumes of 105,000 tons and Trio sales volumes of 106,000 tons. Finally, successful execution on key projects and operational efficiencies supported improved cost margins. Trio delivered its highest quarterly segment margin since 2022, and per ton cost improved 5% compared to the Q1. Before I pass the call to Zach Adams, I wanna highlight a few key developments and operational updates. On April 1, 2026, we sold the majority of the assets of the Intrepid South Ranch to HydroSource Logistics, LLC for total consideration of $70 million, which included the $8 million deposit we received in December 2025. We were able to transact on the ranch at a favorable valuation, unlocking decades worth of cash flows in a single transaction that will allow us to refocus our efforts exclusively on our fertilizer assets. The sale will also allow us to utilize a portion of our sizable deferred tax assets to offset the tax impact of the one-time gain. On lithium, our partners continue to advance FEL-3 engineering and associated permitting. We remain confident in this project and look forward to sharing further details of the project economics as they develop. Overall, we're looking forward to a strong year. Continued steady support for our core business and solid cash position will allow us to capitalize on our unique position in the market and capture additional upside from opportunities like lithium, among others. I'll now pass the call to Zach to provide some commentary on the market. Go ahead, Zach. Thanks, Kevin. Potash saw good subscription during the winter fill program, with customers securing orders to meet most of their Q1 requirements. Following the closure of the order window, posted potash prices increased by $20 per ton, a change reflected in Q2 spot transactions. Trio demand remains resilient as customers value the individual components, particularly sulfate, due to ongoing disruptions in raw sulfur supply from the Middle East, along with the low chloride potassium component. Trio pricing was increased by $15 per ton in late March, with this adjustment realized on spot Q2 sales. Globally, potash fundamentals have been supported by consistent production, broadly stable pricing, and solid demand. Brazil and China imported potash at record levels in the Q1, contributing to a balanced market and reinforcing a constructive outlook for the second half of the year. Turning to agriculture markets, U.S. corn exports are on track to reach record levels for the 2025, 2026 marketing year. Commodity prices for corn, soybeans, and cotton have strengthened in recent weeks driven by weather concerns, supportive demand, and geopolitical tensions affecting market stability. We do recognize the concerns regarding the financial health of growers within the U.S. market, particularly as affordability challenges have been intensified by volatility in input costs arising from the conflict in the Middle East. We anticipate growers will continue to make the input decisions carefully. Potash, whose prices have stayed comparatively stable relative to other nutrients, remains a critical input as growers look to maximize yields. I will now turn the call over to Rick Kim for an operations update. Thanks, Zach. In our Trio segment, the commissioning of a new continuous miner has already increased our tons per operating hour and increased operational efficiency. Additional improvements in our mill have boosted recovery and increased operating hours per shift continues to drive higher production of both granular and premium products. We benefited from these improvements in the Q1, and we expect to continue realizing further improvements through the rest of the year. In our Potash segment, we've seen promising returns this spring from the HB Mine, with higher mill recoveries and improved pond deposition, extending our expected runtime before our summer shutdown. Moab also continues to see improvements in overall plant efficiency, driving higher throughput and recovery. Early season evaporation looks promising, and we anticipate making up the tons lost due to last year's late season rain events. At Wendover, we expect to commence construction on Primary Pond 8 this summer, which will expand our evaporative area, and we anticipate increased production in 2028 as a result. We also expect Primary Pond to start contributing more production this year. Overall, our focus on operational improvements and execution have resulted in higher production and reduced unit cost year-over-year in both potash and Trio. I'll now turn the call over to Cris. Thank you, Rick. To echo Kevin's remarks, Intrepid delivered a strong Q1. Our continued focus on driving production to increase revenues and improve unit economics is visible in our Q1 results. Potash production was 104,000 tons in the Q1, compared to 93,000 tons in the Q1 of 2025. As Kevin and Rick mentioned, this production is due to operational improvements across our mines. Q1 potash sales were $46.1 million, up $2.5 million from the prior quarter, driven primarily by higher realized pricing. Potash gross margin was $3.1 million versus $2.5 million last year as a result of higher realized pricing, partially offset by higher costs on a similar volume. We sold 105,000 tons at an average net realized sales price of $353 per ton, compared to $312 per ton in the Q1 of 2025. Higher production from higher cost sites increased our average potash segment cost of goods sold to $334 per ton in the Q1 of 2026, compared to $313 per ton in the Q1 of 2025, and $332 per ton in the Q4 of 2025. For 2026, we expect our annual potash production to be at the upper end of our guidance of 270,000-285,000 tons, given recent improvements at HB. Turning to Trio, Q1 production was 69,000 tons, a 10% increase versus last year. This increase is largely attributed to the new continuous miner commissioned during the quarter and ongoing plant optimization projects. Sales were $52.5 million, up $2.7 million from the prior year, driven by a 12% increase in our average net realized sales price per ton. This offset a 4% decline in tons sold. Overall, Trio margin was $14.8 million for the quarter, up $4.4 million from last year. This was the highest quarterly segment margin since 2022 due to higher realized pricing and an improvement in COGS, offsetting the slight decline in sales volume. COGS per ton saw an improvement year-over-year and quarter-over-quarter, with $229 per ton versus $235 per ton in Q1 last year and versus $242 per ton in the fourth quarter of 2025. 2026 Trio production, we are expecting to reach 285,000 tons-300,000 tons with COGS of around $230 per ton. This is the expected result from our improvements with the new miner, increased recoveries, and more operating hours per shift. In terms of Q2 guidance, we expect another solid quarter as spring application winds down and our potash facilities enter the summer evaporation season. For potash, we expect our sales volumes to be between 50,000 tons-60,000 tons at an average net realized sales price in the range of $380-$390 per ton. In Trio, we expect our sales volumes to be between 70,000 tons-80,000 tons at an average net realized sales price in the range of $390-$400 per ton. For our 2026 capital program, we expect to spend $40 million-$50 million, with most of our spend related to sustaining capital, specifically at our East Mine, and for the beginning of a new Primary Pond at Wendover, which we expect will begin contributing to Wendover's production in 2028. We continue to consider investment opportunities that will upgrade our assets and optimize future production and efficiency. We are currently evaluating a number of additional high return growth and productivity investment initiatives over the next 18 months-24 months. In summary, 2026 is off to a strong start, and we're excited to see the results from the initiatives we put in place to meaningfully pay off in the form of increased production and improving costs. Operator, we are now ready for the Q&A portion of our call. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. Your first question comes from the line of Lucas Beaumont from UBS. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thanks very much. Just wanted to start on kind of the sale of the South Ranch. I mean, it sounded like you were sort of indicating that potentially you'd get the full $70 million in cash sort of net of the sort of DTA benefits. I guess, one, is that sort of correct? Two, what are you kind of intending to do with the proceeds? I'm sorry, Lucas, what was the last part of your question? What are we gonna do with the cash? Exactly. Yeah. Should we assume you're getting the full $70 million, and then, what are your intentions in terms of deploying it? Are you gonna sit on it to sort of put towards projects going forward? I mean, do you see repurchases as attractive at a current level, or so where would you like to use that? Yeah, look, it's a good question. Let me just give you some context on how we're thinking about that right now. As I've mentioned a bunch of times before since I joined, this is a regular conversation amongst our board, i.e., how to think about capital allocation. Frankly, it's becoming even more topical given the improved performance that we've seen over the last 18 months and the cash build that we're experiencing on the balance sheet at the moment. Let me just kind of reiterate some priorities that I've discussed before just so we're clear and you get a sense of how we think about this. As I laid out early in my tenure here, the 1st order of business was to reestablish an intense focus on the core assets. The goal was to make them more predictable, more reliable, more resilient. I think we can all agree that we've seen improvements on that front, but we're not done there, and I'll address that momentarily. From there, we wanted some time to look at our sustaining capital needs for the business over a reasonable period of time, say five years or so. We're pretty much through that process now and believe long-term core operations should require something on the order of $35 million- $40 million a year of sustaining capital with an add on every few years for larger sustaining items like making a new cavern or building a new pond like we're doing at Wendover right now. Notably, I'll just give you a heads up that 2027 is expected to be one of those years. We can talk about that a little later. Next, and also importantly, we're really focused on across the company on ways we can increase volumes and reduce our costs. This effort's being ingrained into the culture of Intrepid as simply the way we need to think about our business. To be frank, we don't see any silver bullets to increase production substantially in the short term, but we do see numerous opportunities to add incremental tons to the portfolio with attendant effects on costs and efficiencies. I think a good example of that is what's happening at Carlsbad now. You can see that result improved over the past several quarters. As I've also mentioned in the past, we wanted to review our portfolio to determine if there were assets that we held that might make sense in the hands of somebody else, and the South Ranch fit that bill. As you saw, we monetized that asset and brought forward decades of cash flows and frankly put that asset into a better set of hands than us, given the dynamics of what's happening with water in the Permian Basin. Now that the assets, core assets are performing better and we've taken a look out into the future and assessed our capital needs, we wanna be thoughtful about maintaining an adequate amount of dry powder for organic projects or opportunities that exist across our portfolio, and through continued performance to frankly earn the right to consider adjacency opportunities that might make strategic sense for the company. Last but not least, we wanna retain adequate liquidity to buoy us through any rough times that might come our way. For those of you that have been around this sector for a while, you'll know exactly what I'm talking about. I know, I know, Lucas, that was a lot, I realize, but I thought it was important for you and others to hear how we think about capital allocation priorities. Suffice it to say, I think we've made great progress over the year and a half, what I want to leave you with today is the following. Been a lot of requests that we return capital to shareholders. We hear you loud and clear. We always have. We simply had some work to do before this conversation could be had in earnest. Our board's convening later this month to discuss a variety of matters. What I'll leave you with is just know that this topic is chief among them. I'll just leave it at that for now, and hopefully, that gives you some nuggets at least on how we think about it and what might be on the near-term timeframe. Great. Thanks. I mean, that's very helpful. Then I guess just on the- I'm just wanted to kind of talk to you about the, how the Trio market's gonna kinda go, as we look forward here. I mean, you kind of point to like a $10-$15 kind of sequential improvement in pricing into Q2. The, I mean, sulfur markets have been impacted significantly globally from the Middle East disruption, that's kind of raising production costs and raising the cost curves against the synthetic production on that side. How do you kind of see that flowing into the Trio market and impacting pricing? Is there more of an impact to come as 2026 progresses, or do you believe that's kind of incorporated in what you're sort of expecting for Q2 now? Thanks, Lucas, for the question. You know, it's important to remember that customers typically lock in the majority of their spring requirements pretty early to start the year for Trio and potash. Most of those commitments were made ahead of the Iran conflict beginning, and certainly before the full extent of it was realized. We expect to start seeing more and more of that realization and certainly as we kinda see those spot opportunities here in Q2. For the balance of the year, we expect Trio to benefit from a constructive outlook amid a tightening global supply environment on sulfur, which should keep sulfate values firm. You should see that kind of roll through our realized pricing as we kinda move through the rest of the year. Great. Thanks. Just Kevin, I mean, you kinda mentioned, I guess the further efforts to kind of incrementally lift production progressively. I guess switching over to potash, how do you kind of see the trajectory beyond this year to kind of push back above 300,000 tons over time? You wanna take that, Rick? Yeah, sure. Hey, Lucas, this is Rick. You know, we see a number of different incremental opportunities at the core assets. You know, as Kevin mentioned, kind of the past 12-18 months have really been focused in on operational improvements, identifying those and executing on them. You know, continue to see opportunities at HB. We're starting to realize those already, as I mentioned in the earlier comments. We're seeing similar opportunities around Wendover and in Moab as well. The addition of the new primary pond at Wendover, it will start contributing in 2028. Primary Pond 7, which was commissioned a couple of years ago, will really start to see its full productive capacity coming online throughout this year. With the intent of getting that operation back up into the 75,000 to- 80,000 ton per year run rate that it's historically operated at. We have, Great. Thanks. In addition to what Rick, just one more little point, Lucas, in addition to what Rick said, as we talked about before, you know, we have the AMAX cavern. It still needs more work. We wanna be very thoughtful about how we approach that. And to the extent that that, you know, proves out, that would represent a meaningful upside opportunity for us. But we still have work to do there, and we'll keep you posted in the coming quarters on that project. Great. Thanks. I guess just on the lithium project, could you maybe just kind of share how you sort of see the timeline on the milestones there as we sort of move through this year and beyond? I mean, investors are very keen to kind of get an understanding of like how you think the sort of unit cost economics are gonna look there. I mean, I think the sort of production target and the revenue side is sort of all well understood, sort of depending on sort of whatever material is with market pricing. To kind of really understand what it could mean to you guys in the medium term, you know, we sort of need a better view on the cost side. I don't know if there's anything you can kind of share there now or I guess when you sort of think you'll be able to have a better view of that as we sort of work through the process there. Thanks. Yeah. Good question. Look, I don't want to front run our partners. You know, the key milestone that is coming, you know, early this summer will be FEL-3. Then, you know, that is when you have a pretty high degree of precision around your engineering of the build, the cost of the build, and where your operating costs are going to come out. We have a sense of what those are, but it would be way premature for me to start talking about that. You know, given the concentrations that we have of the, you know, the lithium ion relative to a lot of these other brine projects, you know, we have kind of got a head start really when it comes down to it. We feel good about the initial volumes coming out of the project in a couple of years, 5,000 tons LCE. And continue to work very closely with our partners on, you know, assisting them from the, you know, the footprint of their operations, assisting with permitting, you know, getting through the regulatory hurdles, et cetera, all of which is actually going pretty well. I think the big milestone again is FEL-3, and once that's done, that's when we'll be prepared to talk to the market about more precision around timing, cost of the build, and cash operating and full operating costs. Hopefully that's incrementally helpful, Lucas. That's great. Maybe just one on sort of the cost side. I just wanted to sort of understand how you're seeing sort of any cost pressures flowing through the business from the, I guess the inflationary environment that we're in right now. Just is that sort of impacting either potash or Trio? I guess, how would you sort of see that evolving as the year progresses? Just lastly, is there any I mean, I think there's a small residual of some small residual impacts left, I guess, even after the South Ranch sale. I just kind of wanted to understand, are there any kind of stranded costs associated with that? Or, just anything we should think about there going forward as well? Thank you. Maybe hitting the last part of your question first to the extent I understood it properly. You know, we had a oilfield services segment when we had South Ranch. We'll still have some oilfield services activity, but that'll get subsumed into the other segment, and we'll discontinue the oilfield services segment. In terms of kinda cleanup post-deal, I'm looking at Cris to see if I'm gonna get this right. I think it's pretty clean, and you're not gonna see any sort of tail effects permeating through the P&L or the balance sheet after the sale was concluded. Did I do okay there, Cris? You did. Okay. There are very minimal costs left behind that'll be absorbed into the other parts of the business. Fair. Then I'll take a shot at the sort of the cost question, Lucas. I mean, yeah, I mean, we're seeing that kinda all over the place. It's not, like, radical or anything, but, you know, fuel clearly is the biggest nemesis, and it's highly volatile. It's bouncing all over the place. You know, we have some natural gas exposure over time. That's actually behaving pretty well kinda given the natural gas debt. Winter always portends for, you know, a potential spike. Beyond that, we're not seeing anything that I would characterize as material, unless Rick Kim has information to the contrary. No, I agree with Kevin. I think, you know, one of the things that's probably important to call out is while we do see the fluctuations in fuel, if you look at the nature of our mining processes, we're probably not as impacted or exposed to those fuel fluctuations as surface, traditional surface and underground miners. Our solution mining process does insulate us a bit from that. All right. Thanks very much. Your next question comes from the line of Vincent Andrews from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Hi, thank you for all the color on that wide slew of questions there. We really appreciate it. Oh, and this is Justin Pellegrino on for Vincent. I just wanted to double-click on some of those. First being, you know, well understood on the capital allocation priorities. In the meantime, should we expect the cash kinda generate some interest income on your P&L? Yes. Yes, it will. Those cash balances are placed in very safe federal types of securities. Yeah, you will see some interest income start to leak through the P&L as we move ahead. We've built up a pretty hefty balance. I know we reported as of the end of the Q1, but clearly the incremental $62 million for the Ranch transaction came in after the end of the quarter, and we've built some additional cash too. I think current cash balance stands on the order of $170 million or so. Definitely you'll start to see some interest flow through. Okay. Perfect. Thank you. Then, one more on COGS for the rest of the year. Can you just give us some cadence for COGS per ton in potash throughout the balance of the year? I know the press release mentioned some higher cost mix in production towards some higher cost sites. Can you just give us some cadence for the balance of the year? Thank you. Yeah. Justin, typically our COGS will fluctuate throughout the year, especially in our solar sites, largely due to the production volumes. We're actually finishing up our harvest season here within the next few weeks. And the each of the sites will go into their summer shutdown. That does have an impact on the COGS that we will report for the next two quarters, or we anticipate to see that. Once we get later in the year, I mean, we do expect to see some of those operational efficiencies that we've talked about, starting to realize, in both production and cost. I think, you know, especially into the latter half of the year, we'll start to see those materialize. Great. Thank you. That's all the questions I had. Your next question comes from the line of Jason Ursaner from Bumbershoot Holdings. Please go ahead. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. Congrats on the quarter and the sale of Oilfield. I think, you know, I've asked you about capital allocation pretty much every quarter since you joined Kevin. I appreciate the answers to Lucas. I'm not gonna hammer too much on it. Just the last question or You said that the cash balance as of the end of April is around $170 million? Yeah, plus or minus. Okay. Correct. I guess, what is the, any rationale why we didn't include it in the press release for this quarter to kinda let algorithms and whatever pick up on that just given we've included it pretty much every quarter, kind of that month-end cash balance the last year or two? Yeah, look, that's a fair question. I mean, obviously the press release pertains to the Q1, and the deal on the ranch didn't close until the day after the Q1. You know, technically, you know, we took the view that we're gonna just discuss everything inside the Q1. Perhaps it would've made sense to address cash on hand and liquidity more poignantly actually in the press release. We weren't trying to hide from it was just focused on the quarter. Okay. Just any update on kinda the XTO, Exxon permitting process, any update on where the BLM stands with that? You know, I'm sorry. We actually don't have any, like, information that's useful. We see kinda what's going on in that part of the world where we operate. It's super busy, lots of activity, but we don't have any insights as to ExxonMobil's near-term plans. I mean, we continue to be bullish on, you know, their Big Eddy development process, and it's gonna come. We just don't know exactly when. Okay. I think that's it for me then. Appreciate all the color that you gave on the capital allocation side. Yeah. Thank you, Jason. A reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star then one on your telephone keypad. At this time, there are no further questions. I would like to turn the conference back over to Kevin Crutchfield for any closing remarks. I'd like to give one final thank you today before we conclude to our team here in Denver, our teams in Utah and New Mexico for their hard work and dedication over the last quarter and frankly, the last couple of years. Also, those of you who attended the call today, thank you for patching in, and we look forward to keeping you posted as in the future. Thank you, everybody. Have a great day. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day. You may now disconnect your lines.