Greetings! Welcome to Juniper Networks Q3 2023 Financial Results conference call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. Please note, this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the conference over to your host, Jess Lubert, Head of Investor Relations at Juniper. You may begin. Thank you, operator. Good afternoon, and welcome to our Q3 2023 conference call. Joining me today are Rami Rahim, Chief Executive Officer, and Ken Miller, Chief Financial Officer. Today's call contains certain forward-looking statements based on our current expectations. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and actual results might differ materially. These risks are discussed in our most recent 10-Q, the press release furnished with our 8-K file today, the CFO commentary posted on the investor relations portion of our website today, and in our other SEC filings. Our forward-looking statements speak only as of today, and Juniper undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements. Our discussion today will include non-GAAP financial results. Reconciliation information can be found on the investor relations section of our website under Financial Reports. Commentary on why we consider non-GAAP information a useful view of the company's financial results is included in today's press release. Following our prepared remarks, we will take questions. We ask that you please limit yourself to one question so that as many people as possible who would like to ask a question have a chance. With that, I will now hand the call over to Rami. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you for joining us on today's call to discuss our Q3 2023 results. We delivered better than expected results during the Q3, with total revenue of $1,398 million, exceeding the midpoint of our guidance. Profitability was also strong in Q3, as our non-GAAP growth and operating margins both exceeded expectations, resulting in non-GAAP earnings per share of $0.60, which was above the high end of our quarterly guidance range. Our teams continued to execute well against the backdrop of a challenging macro environment. We remain confident in our positioning from a technology perspective and our ability to win across industry verticals as customers increasingly look to leverage AIOps and software automation tools to improve network operations and reduce overhead costs, what we call experience-first networking. We believe our attention to providing customers with the best user experience, along with our continued go-to-market focus, will position us to deliver healthy, long-term growth and improve profitability. Total product orders came in largely as expected during Q3, and the rate of year-over-year order decline improved as compared to the prior few quarters. Our enterprise business remained healthy as orders experienced high single-digit sequential growth and exceeded our expectations. Enterprise strength helped offset order weakness with our cloud and service provider customers, where we continued to see accounts digesting prior purchases before placing new orders. I'm extremely encouraged by the momentum we're seeing in our enterprise business, which once again delivered record revenue results and accounted for more than 50% of total revenue for the first time in Juniper's history. Total enterprise revenue grew by nearly 40% year-over-year in the Q3 timeframe and represented our largest and fastest growing vertical for a fourth consecutive quarter. Importantly, new logos saw another quarter of healthy double-digit growth, and we continued to see strong mid-market success as enterprise deal registration through the channel grew by more than 20% year-over-year, and commercial orders grew by nearly 20% year-over-year. We believe continued growth in new logos and mid-market strength speaks to the differentiation of our products and our ability to capture share. Our campus and branch business had another record quarter in Q3, with our AI-driven enterprise revenue growing more than 40% year-over-year. Revenue from the Mistified segment of our business, which consists of products driven by Mist AI, also had a record quarter, growing by nearly 100% year-over-year in the Q3 timeframe. Our Mistified orders also achieved a notable milestone in Q3, surpassing a $1 billion run rate on an annualized basis, less than 4 years after crossing the $100 million run rate milestone in Q4 2019. Customers and the industry are recognizing Juniper's clear and defensible leadership when it comes to AI-driven operations delivered via a modern microservices cloud and the meaningful benefits these solutions can provide in terms of reducing network trouble tickets, automating manual tasks, speeding time to deployment, and reducing mean time to repair as compared to competitive platforms. We see these benefits resulting in share gain opportunities as customers transition from legacy on-prem solutions managed by people to next-gen solutions managed using AI and the cloud. We believe this architectural transition remains in the early innings and will represent attractive growth opportunities for years to come. In Q3, we secured a win with a global pharmaceutical leader, the world's largest healthcare provider, added to its Juniper Mist rollout, and two very large retailers extended their Juniper Mist network to include our full stack across Wi-Fi, wired, and SD-WAN. One of these retailers is approaching 10,000 locations. Initial demand for our cloud-based network access control product was also strong, securing more than 50 customer wins in a little more than a quarter of availability, with customers highlighting dramatic reductions in rollout times from days to minutes and simplified operations as being key differentiators. Mistified strength was broad-based across the portfolio, with record wireless, wired, and SD-WAN revenue in the quarter, as well as record full stack wins, where customers purchased several of these campus and branch products together. We view momentum with these full stack wins as a positive forward indicator, given our belief that for every dollar of wireless, there is $2-$3 of wired switching and additional SD-WAN and NAC opportunity. Our enterprise data center business also performed well in Q3, with Apstra continuing to see strong momentum in the market. Apstra new logos grew by more than 80% year-over-year in Q3, and the pipeline of opportunities remains solid. Hardware pull-through for every dollar of Apstra software has been meaningful and growing, which we view as a positive forward indicator for our data center prospects. Key data center wins in the quarter for Apstra and our QFX switch offerings included large government agencies, international tier one service providers, and one of the largest global appliance manufacturers. The performance of our enterprise business shows our diversification strategy is working, and given our level of portfolio differentiation balanced against our relatively modest share in the large markets where we compete, I expect us to grow our enterprise revenue and orders in 2023 and 2024, even in a more challenged macro environment. As highlighted over the last few quarters, we continue to see accounts across each of our customer verticals more closely scrutinizing budgets and project deployment timelines due to the macro uncertainties that are happening around the world. This has been particularly true in the cloud vertical, where many of our customers are still in the process of digesting prior purchases. While these dynamics are likely to pressure our cloud segment for at least the next few quarters, we remain optimistic regarding our longer-term prospects in the cloud. Our optimism is driven by our strong wide-area footprint, the rapid traffic growth that continues in many of these customers' environments, and the opportunity to capitalize on the adoption of large language models and the build-out of AI clusters, where we are seeing strong customer engagement that is driving optimism regarding our opportunity to benefit as the industry increasingly considers Ethernet as the right choice for a wide array of AI/ML use cases, including front end, back end, inference, and storage networks. As I mentioned last quarter, we expect AI adoption to drive a meaningful uptick in traffic growth that is likely to benefit our cloud's wide-area footprint over time. We also remain optimistic regarding our AI data center switching opportunity, where we are already seeing success with cloud major and enterprise accounts due to the performance and power efficiency of our custom silicon, the congestion management capabilities embedded within our Junos operating system, and our support for technologies such as RDMA networking. Additionally, by incorporating Apstra in our AI/ML design, Juniper differentiates in its ability to deliver the turnkey deployment and reliable operations of AI/ML clusters, which is critical to achieving the performance goals required by AI/ML teams. Our service provider business softened in Q3 and was impacted by some of the macro uncertainties that are happening around the world. These dynamics are causing many carriers to more closely scrutinize budgets and, in some cases, to run their networks harder than planned. We found this to be particularly true among our tier two and tier three customers, as well as certain large international accounts, while activity with the US tier one operators has largely tracked according to plan. Despite these macro headwinds, we remain encouraged by the momentum we're seeing in our cloud metro portfolio, where our new ACX 7- K platform had a record revenue quarter and saw solid year-over-year growth from an orders perspective. These products secured six new footprint wins in the Q3 time frame, including a win with an international tier one account. We expect this business to build through the remainder of the year and become more material to revenue in the 2024 time frame and beyond. I'd like to highlight that our services team continued to execute extremely well and delivered another quarter of record revenue and margins during the Q3 timeframe. Services accounts for more than 35% of our total revenue, and we believe represents an underappreciated aspect of the business that is not only recurring and likely to grow in the years to come, but also presents opportunities for margin expansion as the team continues to identify and capture efficiencies. In summary, while the macro environment remains uncertain and is impacting our near-term outlook, I remain confident with our strategy and optimistic regarding our long-term growth prospects. My enthusiasm is fueled by our continued enterprise momentum and the attractive longer-term opportunities we continue to see in the cloud, as well as service provider metro opportunities. I'd also like to emphasize that we remain committed to delivering improved profitability and still expect to deliver greater than 100 basis points of non-GAAP operating margin improvement in 2023. We also expect further improvement in 2024. While we view revenue growth as the primary lever to achieving improved profitability, and reducing costs is never easy, we recently announced an action to protect profitability while preserving investments in strategic areas of the company. I will now turn the call over to Ken, who will discuss our quarterly financial results and outlook in more detail. Thank you, Rami, and good afternoon, everyone. I will start by discussing our Q3 results, then provide some color on our outlook. We ended the Q3 of 2023 with $1.398 billion in revenue, which was over $10 million above the midpoint of our guidance. We delivered non-GAAP diluted earnings per share of $0.60, which was $0.01 above the high end of our guidance range, driven by better-than-expected revenue results and improved gross and operating margins. Total product orders came in largely as expected, and the rate of year-over-year decline improved as compared to the prior few quarters. Enterprise demand continues to be strong and exceeded our expectations, resulting in orders that grew in the high single digits on a sequential basis but were approximately flat year over year. Cloud and service provider demand remained pressured due to digestion of previously placed orders and an unfavorable macroeconomic environment. From a customer solution perspective, on a year-over-year basis, AI-driven enterprise led the way with record revenue and growth of 43%. Automated WAN solutions revenue declined 18%, and cloud-ready data center revenue declined 26%. Looking at our revenue by vertical, on a year-over-year basis, enterprise increased 37%. Service provider declined 20%, and cloud decreased 28%. Total software and related services revenue was $313 million, which was an increase of 27% year-over-year. ARR was $357 million and grew 37% year-over-year. Deferred revenue from our SaaS business grew more than 50% year-over-year. We remain confident in our software transformation and ARR growth. Total security revenue was $160 million, up 14% year-over-year. Our services business remained strong in Q3, posting record revenue and profitability. Service revenue was $500 million and grew 12% year-over-year and 7% sequentially. Non-GAAP service gross margin of 72.8% improved 4.8 percentage points versus a year ago and 3.1 percentage points sequentially. We see the potential for continued services revenue growth and improvements in profitability. In reviewing our top 10 customers for the quarter, five were cloud, three were enterprise, and two were service providers. Our top 10 customers accounted for 29% of total revenue, as compared to 34% in the Q3 of 2022. Non-GAAP gross margin was 59.5%, which was at the high end of our guidance range. This was primarily driven by the improved service margin, favorable software revenue mix, and lower logistics costs, which was partially offset by higher inventory-related expenses. Non-GAAP operating expenses increased 4% year-over-year, primarily due to headcount-related costs, but were down 1% sequentially. Non-GAAP operating margin was 17.5% for the quarter, which was above our expectations, primarily driven by better-than-expected gross margin. Cash flows from operations were $329 million. We paid $70 million in dividends, reflecting a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. We also repurchased $125 million worth of shares in the quarter. We exited the Q3 of 2023 with total cash, cash equivalents, and investments increasing to $1.4 billion. Lastly, we incurred an aggregate amount of $62.5 million in restructuring charges in the Q3 of 2023 in connection with the plans to reallocate resources to efficiently support our strategic priorities while delivering against our profitability goals. As disclosed in an 8-K filed earlier this month, we announced a plan to reduce worldwide headcount by approximately 440 employees, resulting in the majority of this restructuring charge. Please reference our SEC filings for more information. Overall, we delivered solid results in the Q3, and I'm pleased with our team's dedication and commitment. Now, I would like to provide some color on our guidance, which you can find detailed in the CFO commentary available on our investor relations website. The macroeconomic environment is expected to remain challenged, which has been backed into our outlook. For the Q4 of 2023, we expect to see sequential growth in bookings and expect the rate of year-over-year order declines to further moderate. We continue to see healthy enterprise momentum and expect orders to grow both in the Q4 and on a full year basis. However, we expect demand from cloud and service provider customers to remain constrained as they continue to digest previously placed orders. Non-GAAP gross margin is expected to modestly increase in the Q4 of 2023 to approximately 60% due to expected lower supply chain costs. We will continue to manage non-GAAP operating expenses prudently and expect a sequential decline of approximately $10 million. With our Q4 guidance, total 2023 revenue is expected to grow approximately 5%-6% on a full year basis, and non-GAAP operating margin will expand by more than 100 basis points. Additionally, non-GAAP earnings per share are expected to grow double digits in 2023, meeting our previously stated guidance for revenue and profitability. While the current global macroeconomic environment poses some uncertainty, we would like to provide some initial color regarding our current outlook for 2024. Bookings across all verticals are expected to grow next year on a full year basis. We expect our enterprise revenue to grow. However, total revenue results will depend on the rate and pace of recovery in our cloud and service provider verticals, which remain uncertain at this time. Based on our current order expectations and backlog levels, we expect a return to more traditional seasonal revenue patterns beginning in the Q1 of 2024. As a reminder, prior to the industry-wide supply chain shortage, we historically experienced double-digit sequential revenue declines in the Q1, followed by sequential revenue growth throughout the remainder of the year. We expect non-GAAP gross margin to expand in 2024. We will continue to manage non-GAAP operating expenses prudently and expect non-GAAP operating margin expansion in 2024. However, our ability to achieve this objective will be partially dependent on revenue results. Our long-term financial objectives have not changed. We plan to deliver sustainable revenue growth, improved operating margin, and earnings expansion over time. Finally, I'm pleased to announce we have declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per share to be paid this quarter to stockholders of record. In closing, I'd like to thank the Juniper team for their continued dedication and commitment to Juniper's success, especially in this dynamic environment. Now, I'd like to open the call for questions. Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. Please hold while we poll for questions. The first question today is coming from Amit Daryanani from Evercore. Amit, your line is live. Thanks, bud. Good afternoon, everyone, and good job on the free margins over here. Fairly impressive. You know, I think my question is really around the weakness you're seeing on the cloud and service provider market in aggregate. And I'm really curious if you're seeing any change in tone over the last 90 days, because a lot of the service provider weakness you talked about last quarter as well. And maybe across both the segments, is your sense that the weakness is coming more from customers having to digest the product they already have, or is it more because they're pushing out newer deployment? I'm curious how they stack up across the segments and then, you know, maybe related to this new segment. You know, from a historical perspective, how long do you think these corrections typically last? Perhaps that answers a little easier on service provider versus cloud, but I'd love to get what the historical perspective looks. Thank you. Hi, Amit, this is Rami. I'll start. For some reason, you're really choppy, so I hope the issue is not on our end. I think I caught most of what you asked, really around the demand environment that we're seeing for cloud and SP, and I think you're looking for some commentary around sort of the duration of that, the challenges that we're seeing in that segment. I'd say first, not much has changed from the last quarter in terms of what we're seeing in SP and cloud. Service provider is probably incrementally more challenging. As I mentioned in my prepared remark, not so much because of tier one service providers in the U.S., more about tier two, tier three, and international. Cloud is challenging as we expected. I don't think it's gotten worse or better, really. We've always expected that the digestion period that is being faced in the cloud and to some extent in the service provider vertical as well, is going to last for several quarters. Having said that, I don't think it's all negative. I mean, in the service provider space, for example, there are plenty of opportunities out there that we're competing for, especially in the metro, where we're seeing really great early momentum, and I expect that that's going to more meaningfully contribute to our top line next year. In the cloud provider space, there are projects that are ongoing. We're competing for new projects, for certain. The AI cluster opportunity is going to emerge as, I think, a wonderful opportunity for us to go in to pursue. I just think it's gonna be a few more quarters of digestion before those opportunities start to play out and we begin to benefit from them. Got it. Thank you. Thanks, Amit. Thank you. The next question is coming from Michael Ng from Goldman Sachs. Michael, your line is live. Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for the question. I just have two. First, I was just wondering if you could talk a little bit more around the strength in hardware, maintenance, and professional services. You know, very good quarter-on-quarter growth. Was there, you know, something that may have helped on the maintenance side, whether it's, you know, the incremental challenges in SP that you talked about that may have led to more maintenance? And then second, I was just wondering if you could talk a little bit more about product orders. It was encouraging to hear that it was in line with expectations and the year-over-year decline improved, but, how much did product orders actually decline in the quarter? Thank you. Yeah, I'll take those questions. On the services side, very proud of the team, and we've seen some great, you know, record services results, both on the revenue side, up 12% year-over-year, as well as on the margin side. Really phenomenal results there. The services business does include predominantly our maintenance, professional services business, but it does include a growing portion of our SaaS software, which has been growing faster than the overall services results. The SaaS business is absolutely helping services overall. As you look at just the maintenance business, which is what you talked about, and the growth there, really, there's a lagging indicator of, you know, of what we've seen in the past couple of years on the product side. So the product growth of the last couple of years have really given us the opportunity to expand our install base and to attach more service contracts, and we're realizing the benefit of that now. So that's been great. On the product booking side and the order side, they did come in as we expected. Enterprise was maybe a little more favorable than we originally anticipated at the start of the quarter. Service provider was a little bit weaker than we anticipated, but in aggregate, it was as expected, and as we predicted, we are starting to lessen that year-over-year decline that we've had the last couple of quarters, and I expect us to further lessen that decline here in the Q4. Great. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is coming from Samik Chatterjee from JP Morgan. Samik, your line is live. Yep. Hi, thanks for taking my question. I guess, if I start on the margin front, you're guiding to operating margin expansion, although with the sort of caveat about what that revenue outlook looks like. I do see you sort of look expanding gross margins next year. Can you just outline what is sort of the sort of puts and takes here? What is the amount of revenue decline you can absorb, even with gross margin expansion and still sort of deliver operating margin expansion as you look to next year? Just a quick clarification on Michael's question here. So you said orders have tracked in the quarter largely in line, but you seem to be moderating your full Q order trajectory of saying now it's maybe a more modest decline, where earlier you were saying it's an increase, as of the last quarter. So there seems to have been an incremental change there, even though it tracked in line in the quarter. So can you just clarify what led to that change? Thank you. Yes, absolutely. So this is Ken. On the margin expansion for next year, which we are anticipating, you know, we are gonna. You know, we are expecting a gross margin improvement next year. We're also, you know, we will continue to be prudent on cost controls. So with the gross margin expansion as well as the prudence on cost controls, we do believe we will expand operating margin. You know, that really would apply to revenue at, you know, say, modest decline levels. You know, if revenue declines were to get larger than that, it would be more challenging, but we would stay laser focused on protecting profitability, and, you know, if necessary, we would consider taking further costs out of the business to protect our margins. On the Q4 orders perspective, you're right. In prior quarters, we did mention we thought, you know, we will return to year-on-year growth, potentially as soon as Q4. We still might return to year-on-year growth in Q4. Quite confident that the year-on-year decline, if there is one, will be significantly lessened from the last couple of quarters. But, you know, we may return to year-on-year growth in Q4, but it's not factored into my current base case. I do expect us to return to a full year growth or year-over-year growth in 2024, early in 2024, and on a full year basis in 2024, I would expect all verticals to have full year growth. Thank you. Thanks for taking my question. Thank you. The next question is coming from Alex Henderson from Needham. Alex, your line is live. Great, thanks. I was hoping you could give us some sense of when you think some things are gonna normalize, and most specifically, at what juncture do you think your backlog is fully normalized, and at what juncture do you think your excess inventory will normalize? I assume that's with a lag to the backlog. And do you think there's any risk within that inventory, as we're, you know, going through these delays and changing environment, is there anything in your inventory that you think might, might, might be an obsolescence problem? Thanks. Good questions. Yeah, on the backlog front, you know, backlog has come down faster or normalized faster than we expected this year, largely because the supply chain has actually improved much quicker than we expected from a lead time perspective. So we have seen backlog come down. I expect it to continue to come down in the Q4 as well. I still believe we will remain, we'll exit the year at an elevated backlog position, but at this point, I do not believe it'll be two times the elevated position that we've been talking about in prior periods. So I think it'll be elevated, but not quite two times. I do expect backlog to fully normalize probably by the middle of next year. I would say probably the first half to the middle of next year, backlog should be kind of fully normalized. Inventory has been growing throughout the last couple of years. I would expect this to plateau and start to come down at some point in 2024. It is going to take longer, to your point, the inventory kind of normalization, if you will, it's going to take a few years, in my opinion, and I don't think we'll ever get down to previous normals, right? I think we've learned some lessons with the recent supply chain situation. I think we'll continue to carry inventory at higher levels than we historically did, but there is still fairly, you know, fairly sizable room for it to reduce over the next few years. On the cost of that inventory, there are costs. I mean, I mentioned in the gross margin guidance, we had a very strong gross margin quarter, really highlighted by software services, and we are seeing some of the, you know, the earlier transitory costs, i.e., logistics and expedite fees, come down. Some of the goodness in gross margin was offset by an increase in inventory carrying charges that would include, you know, excess and obsolescence reserves, as well as just carrying charges. We are paying for those now. That's factored in, obviously, to our results and to our near-term and longer-term guidance. I do think there's opportunity for those to reduce over time as inventory starts to normalize. Great, thanks. Thank you. The next question is coming from Simon Leopold from Raymond James. Simon, your line is live. Great, thanks for taking the question. First, just a quick clarification, if I might. In your prepared remarks, you talk about a return to normal seasonality in 2024, and you also make a reference to Q1 being down double digits in the past. Are we to take it that you expect Q1 2024 to be down by a double-digit rate? That's the clarification. Simple. In terms of the broader question, however, I see a number of the third-party market research firms expect the campus environment, both wireless LAN and campus switching, will decline in 2024, and you've been experiencing some good growth here. I assume it's decelerating, but you sound very confident that you'll still grow. Could you, you know, help us unpack what separates your view from the market research firms? Thank you. Thanks for the question, Simon. I'll start with your second question first, and I'll then hand it over to Ken. So first, you're right, I am confident in our Campus and Branch business. We have grown over the last few years, even in the face of pretty significant headwinds. You know, at a time when, for example, in the middle of COVID, where some of our peers were seeing some declines, we consistently saw growth in our Campus and Branch business. I think the solutions that we're offering that include AIOps, that simplify and reduce the cost of operations, actually truly resonate with customers that are looking for executing on digital transformation projects in a situation where their budgets are challenged, right? We're basically enabling them to transform their business with less total cost of ownership. That's part of the value proposition of our solutions that's really resonating. In addition to that, you know, the campus and branch market all up, if you include wired, wireless, and WAN, it's a $25 billion market opportunity, give or take, of which we're a small player, and plenty of room for us to grow, even in the face of a total addressable market that's not growing all that much or even not even growing at all. So for all of these reasons, I'm super optimistic about our enterprise business and especially our campus and branch business looking forward. Yeah, and on your clarification question, the short answer is yes. I would expect a sequential decline from Q4 to Q1, in that double-digit, you know, realm based on kind of previous, traditional patterns. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is coming from David Vogt from UBS. David, your line is live. Great. Thanks, guys, for taking my question. I'm going to kind of bundle a couple of things here, all related, if you, if you may, if you let me. So I'm trying, Ken, I'm trying to understand sort of the seasonal patterns of the business that you referenced going into Q1 and then sequentially getting stronger, because the business is a little bit different today than it was pre-COVID, right? Mist is much stronger, and I would imagine the severity of the decline in cloud is much deeper than you would have anticipated. So I guess the first question is, does the normal seasonal patterns hold, or is there some sort of variability around the normal seasonal patterns in the years prior to COVID? And then in conjunction with that, I think you said backlog should get normalized by the end of the Q2. Does that mean you're expecting roughly, you know, $300-$500 million of revenue from backlog in the first half of 2024 to show up as revenue? And then I have a follow-up. Yeah, so I'll address the seasonal pattern one. You know, we do expect the double-digit decline Q4 to Q1, as we mentioned. And then from there, we expect sequential growth throughout the rest of the quarter. I would say, you know, we've talked a lot about revenue. Next year is uncertain, predominantly because it's just unclear about the pace and timing, you know, the size and timing of the recovery within cloud and SP. So that implies to me that we expect it to recover, you know, at some point next year. We're just not exactly sure when. And when that does, that should accelerate revenue. So, you know, I would expect revenue to be, you know, maybe a bit more back-end loaded, probably, you know, probably closest traditional patterns this last year, 2023 or this year. 2023 was not a kind of a sequential growth quarter. It was kind of a flat-ish quarter from a quarter-to-quarter perspective throughout the year. Next year, I think we'll start down and, and it will build back up as the year progresses. And then the second question- Then on the backlog, because it sounds like it's gonna be normal after the end of the Q2. So that sounds like it'd be a pretty healthy tailwind, despite sort of the commentary for sequential pressure in the Q1. So just wanted to clarify that. Yeah. So backlog continues to be a bit of a tailwind in each of our quarters, but it's lessening quarter after quarter as it starts to normalize. So, you know, not giving any specific guidance other than I do expect it, you know, remain elevated as we exit the year, but not to the degree that we previously thought. We were thinking it was gonna be two times previous kind of historical levels. We now think it'll be less than that, but still be above historical levels. Okay. Thanks, guys. Thank you. The next question is coming from George Notter from Jefferies. George, your line is live. Hi, guys. Thanks very much. I guess I wanted to dig in on, on gross margin a bit more. Can you walk us through some of the puts and takes on gross margin? I guess I'm thinking more about some of the impacts from the supply chain crunch. It sounds like, I would imagine there's certainly high-cost componentry that's running through the gross margin line right now. Also, it sounds like, there's some write-downs associated with excess and obsolete inventory here as well. I guess, can you give us a sense for how big those components are in terms of their impact on gross margin? Yeah. So I mean, we are seeing, we're definitely seeing some improvements in what we used to refer to as the transitory costs, right? These were predominantly, logistics costs and, you know, expedite fees or purchase price variance fees, where we're paying more just to get, you know, a hold of product that was in, you know, scarce, you know, hard to get. We clearly are not paying any more of those fees as we are able to get products pretty much on time with standard lead times at this point. The supply chain is completely normalized from a lead time perspective, but we do still have some inventory that we bought at prior higher prices, as you mentioned, and that's gonna bleed through over the next few quarters. But each quarter, we're getting more and more of that benefit or less and less of those additional fees on the expedite side. Logistics has effectively recovered completely, right? Where the logistics costs that we were paying, the elevated logistics costs, have completely normalized. And that's obviously benefiting our current gross margin results and our expectations going forward. The one area that has gone, you know, negative, if you will, or gotten worse over the last 12 months, are those inventory carrying fees that I mentioned. And that's really just a factor of the balance sheet and inventory that we're carrying. So I would expect those costs to remain, for the next, you know, few quarters, higher than normal levels, as inventory remains higher than normal levels, but I do see a path to recovery on those as well. All this is factored into, you know, our guidance, obviously for Q4, as well as our expectation that next year we expect to grow gross margin. Got it. Okay, that helps. And then also, you know, back to the services gross margin strength, this quarter, I guess I'm just curious for more detail on what drove that strength. It sounds like it was probably the SaaS business, but that services gross margin really did step function up in Q3. I guess I'm wondering exactly if that was the driver or there's other things at work there. Thanks. Yeah, the revenue, SaaS was definitely a part of it and has been a continual part of it for the last, you know, few years. SaaS is becoming a bigger part of our overall business. You know, we, we disclosed on the call our AR business at, you know, $357 million, at, you know, an all-time high and growing quite nicely. So that is becoming a bigger factor of overall services. However, I don't want to discount the maintenance business, which also grew nicely in the quarter, and the efficiencies we're getting within our services organization. So really, this is a situation of revenue growth and cost of revenue decline, and that's resulting in the margin expansion that you're seeing. Got it. One last one. Is it fair to say there's no one-time items driving that, gross margin this quarter, that that's really a baseline that you should continue to kind of move off of going forward? Is that, is that fair to say? I think it's fair to say that directionally, we should be moving up as we move forward. Any given quarter, you might see some, you know, some small anomalies, but I do feel good about the ability to continue to grow gross margin in more of an aggregate, you know, time period basis. Great. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is coming from James Fish from Piper Sandler. James, your line is live. Hey, guys. Kind of working back on Simon's question before on Mist. You know, it's been a huge behemoth, and we constantly hear the need to upgrade wireless LAN due to specifically going back to work, actually, and all of us having Zoom and Teams meetings still, actually in the office with those that are not in the office. Those apps obviously are showing bandwidth improvements, and we've been seeing the strength in wireless LAN for a while now. And really, the core of this, Rami, is how much more is left in this business from a, let's separate the market perspective, as Simon pointed out, like the decline potentially for next year versus the outright share gains. What do you see left in the pipeline and opportunity? And Ken, just for you, I mean, just to round out this discussion, you know, prior to the supply chain glut, and as you guys matured, it looked like you averaged about 12%-14% declines in Q1, and, you know, Q1s have been about 22%-23% of your year. That kind of backs me into about a 2% decline for next year. And I know you're not gonna, you know, bless that number necessarily, but, you know, you're talking about orders growing, as you said. So I guess, what kind of order magnitude are you looking for for growth? And, you know, are you thinking it as low single-digit decline for next year as the way we should be modeling? Thanks, guys. Okay, let me start with your first question, and Ken, I'll let you talk a little bit more about the commentary for next year. I'll address the Mist question from both the standpoint of sort of market dynamics and then what's happening with our business more specifically. From a market dynamic standpoint, I think it's really important to understand that the, if you look at the campus and branch market all up, that's, you know, sort of a slow, maybe flattish type market opportunity. Within the campus and branch market, there's actually a segment really around cloud managed. These are basically enterprise solutions, where the control and the management of that solution is really done through the cloud. And that part of the market is actually growing at a healthy clip, and I expect that it will continue to grow through next year as well. And that is the opportunity that we are entirely focused on, at least when it comes to campus and branch. You know, every single one of our access points is connected to the cloud, managed through the cloud with an AIOps engine, Marvis, in the cloud. All of the growth that we're seeing now in the wired switching, as well as in the WAN, is happening through the cloud. Even the security capabilities, such as network access control that we've introduced, is a cloud-based solution as well. I think it's a little bit. It's wrong to look at the growth of just the campus and branch market all up. It's actually more useful to look at it from the standpoint of that cloud-connected portion of the market that's actually growing at a much, much faster clip. In terms of, you know, the solution itself, really, when it comes to harnessing the power of AIOps, and I know it's a bit of a used and abused word out there, I mean, the proof is in the pudding. Our customers today are seeing real benefits, reduction in number of tickets by 90%+, reduction in total time frame it takes to deploy a new solution from what used to be a year to a matter of weeks, if not maybe a month or so. The root cause analysis that used to take days, with all of the frustration of people that are trying to use the network to do whatever they want to do, has been reduced to essentially no time at all, because in most of the time, we're proactively identify issue, identifying issues and fixing them. You mentioned Zoom. We have already integrated Zoom visibility into our Mist solution so that when there is, in fact, some sort of a video issue, we can, if not proactively, instantly provide the IT staff visibility into whether the issue is more in the application side, the wireless side, the wired side, the cloud, et cetera. And that's a capability that our IT customers are really, really happy to see. So I know I'm maybe beating a little bit of a dead horse here. I'm very optimistic about the competitiveness of our solution in the market, whether it be a challenge market or not. When it comes to 2024, revenue growth, it's a little too early to provide guidance for 2024, particularly with some of the weakness we're seeing with the cloud and service provider customers. Let me walk you through some of the puts and takes. I mean, clearly, the backlog drawdown that we're going through in 2023 is going to provide a pretty significant headwind to revenue in 2024. Orders are going to need to accelerate just to offset some of that backlog-related headwind that we're experiencing from a revenue perspective in 2023. You know, with that said, I do expect orders to accelerate in 2024. I expect full year growth across all of our verticals. I also expect enterprise revenue to grow in 2024 on a full year basis. So really it comes down to cloud and SP and the timing and pace of that recovery, and that's what, you know, a little bit too early to call at this point. So we're not giving specific guidance on 2024 other than based on, you know, the backlog expectations and our order expectations in Q1, we do expect to see a return to more traditional patterns. Very helpful color, guys. Thanks. Thank you. The next question is coming from Karl Ackerman from BNP Paribas. Karl, your line is live. Yes, thank you. I have two questions. Rami, perhaps a question for you to start. So the upside of the quarter appears to be on the services side, while product growth is going the other way. You know, I understand there is a mixed dynamic at play on services, given the growth that the company is seeing in enterprise, but where do you think we are in the cycle for service provider and cloud spending on product hardware? Yeah. So, cloud and SP, as I mentioned, they're definitely going through a period of digestion after they, for the last couple of years, have bought a lot of equipment. I mean, if you recall in the cloud provider segment for us, or a vertical for us, there were a few quarters where their order growth was in the, you know, 100% year-over-year, sort of, you know, range. So the fact that they're going to take some time to go and to consume that inventory, to deploy it, is as expected, and this is also happening within the SP space as well. The other thing that I can say is, you know, if you look at these businesses over the years, there have been ebbs and flows. They've always been lumpy. I do not believe that there's anything structural that is happening right now in either the SP space or the cloud space that would suggest that this is the new normal. I expect that they will both bounce back, and as Ken mentioned, orders in both of these verticals will recover next year. In terms of the timing, the time frame, it's difficult to say. All I can tell you at this point is that it's going to take a few more quarters of digestion before we start to see a meaningful recovery, meaningful rebound, but I'm optimistic it's going to come. Maybe the last thing I would say is the following: You know, it's the very fact that these verticals, cloud and service providers, have traditionally been lumpy, that we, several years ago, decided very strategically, very deliberately, to pursue the enterprise and to diversify our business into the enterprise. And it is, in fact, now the enterprise, which for the first time in our history, represents over 50% of our revenue, this past quarter, is giving us the resilience that we need to weather challenges in SP and cloud. Those challenges are going to go away. It's not going to be the new normal, as I mentioned, and eventually we'll have the benefit of a rebounding SP and cloud business, in addition to an enterprise business that I believe will continue to perform well without all of the typical gyrations of the business that we have, you know, endured in SP and cloud historically. Thank you. The next question is coming from Atif Malik from Citi. Atif, your line is live. Hi, thank you for taking my question. I have two. The first one is for Rami. Rami, in your prepared remarks, you sounded quite constructive on the Ethernet adoptions for AI clusters. You talked about front-end, back-end, inference storage. Can you talk about the timing of the Ethernet adoption? Is this something like 2025 event, or are you seeing a real, you know, pilot or volume rollout? I'm actually quite bullish about the AI cluster opportunity. I, as I mentioned in the last call, you know, I think we all have to acknowledge that today, the technology of choice for connectivity between GPUs in either inference or learning clusters is InfiniBand. It's not Ethernet. However, the momentum behind Ethernet in the industry is very strong, and so I believe it is a matter of time before Ethernet reigns as the fabric technology of choice in AI clusters. I do believe this will present opportunities for us. In terms of timing, I think next year, 2024, maybe closer to the second half of the year. In particular, what we're seeing, especially among the cloud majors customers for us, there are a lot of projects. There are a lot of, you know, opportunities out there where we are being asked, there have been some good technical dialogue about how we move Ethernet to become sort of that, cluster technology of choice for either learning or inference, for their, solutions. And, and in fact, even large enterprises, we're seeing that more and more large enterprises, financial services, insurance companies, even healthcare, they're pursuing these, private clusters. All up, I'm optimistic about the opportunity. I like how we stack up from a technology standpoint with the combination of our customer and merchant silicon, our Junos operating system features that we developed specifically for the Ethernet cluster solution, and Apstra, which provides the automation and the visibility into an Ethernet AI cluster solution that give me, you know, good optimism for capturing a fair share, if not more, in this market opportunity. Great. And then, Ken, when you guys talk about your enterprise revenues to grow next year, is that growth mostly attributable to the market share, or are you seeing the overall market also grow for enterprise? Yeah, I expect our enterprise revenue, I expect our enterprise business to grow faster than market. I do think we will take market share. The market, as many are predicting, is expected to slow down pretty significantly next year as compared to this year. We expect to be able to grow, even if the market, you know, is slightly down, we would expect to grow our enterprise business. We are absolutely expecting market share taking. Thank you. The next question is coming from Meta Marshall from Morgan Stanley. Meta, your line is live. Great. Thanks so much. Maybe first question, I know on the enterprise side, you guys are not as tied to macro, just given kind of the share game position you're in. But just wanted to get a sense of any commentary around time from, you know, initial Wi-Fi sales to kind of the upsell of additional campus switching or additional SD-WAN, just whether you're seeing an elongation of that in a more challenged macro, or if it's actually shorter, just given the compelling ROI. Maybe just as a second question, you know, as we've kind of extended this inventory digestion period on cloud and service provider, just the visibility that you have within those customers of just how much inventory they have, what is kind of the ongoing dialogue to get a sense of, you know, just when you guys could have a little bit more sense of visibility there? Thanks. Thanks for the questions, Meta. So let me start with the first one on macro, and I think specifically the timing between sort of initial sale of a Mist solution to subsequent use cases. It honestly is all over the map. We have seen accounts that have traditionally been Wi-Fi customers, have loved the technology, the ease of operations, and years later have come back to us saying, "Hey, we'd like to introduce wired WAN," etc. But in many cases, we're actually selling the full technology stack day one. In fact, we are deliberately tracking sales of full stack solutions, and we hit a record, another record in Q3, where a full stack solution would be some combination of use cases, wired and wireless, wired and WAN, wireless and WAN, et cetera. And we're continuously adding more and more of these capabilities, an example of which would be the NAC, Network Access Control, where in the Q3 timeframe alone, we added around 50 new customers, and it's starting to grow quite rapidly. We're incenting our sellers to cross-sell. We're enabling them to cross-sell. It's definitely part of our sales motion. On the visibility, I guess it really goes back to the question I just answered recently. It's difficult to know exactly how much inventory levels our customers have, but we do know that at least for the next few quarters, in both SP and cloud, you know, their focus is going to be on deploying what they have bought, first receiving what they have bought, deploying it, you know, getting it up and running, before they start to feel the need to make, you know, meaningful orders again. It's just gonna be measured in a few quarters. Thank you. The next question is coming from Tal Liani from Bank of America. Tal, your line is live. Yes. Hi. Hey. Two questions. Number one is the cloud decline, cloud vertical declined 28% this year, this quarter. Can you tell us what, what's the basis for the decline? Is it the absorption of historical orders, or is it delays of projects or what's kind of the basis? That's number one. And number two, the enterprise vertical, this is the Q4 of very, very strong growth, 37%. And if I look back, it's four quarters that you doubled the growth from the previous four quarters. And the question is the same more or less here: What is driving it? And then once we get to next quarter and the following four quarters, the comps are very tough. What do you think is gonna happen to the growth rate? I'm asking qualitatively just to understand what's driving it. Thanks. Okay, thanks for the questions, Tal. Let's start with cloud providers. The biggest thing driving the decline today is the fact that lead times have gone from what was over a year to normal, you know, just a few weeks. And so the need for them to purchase in sort of like way upfront from when their needs are is just not there anymore, and therefore, they've just reduced the orders that they're placing. So that is the number one thing that's affecting our business. It's not the only thing. There have definitely been some project pushouts. I think macro has affected their own businesses and the need for equipment, so that would be the second thing. And I think the other thing is they have shifted some of their priorities to, for example, AI, AI, GPUs, which, as you know, are extremely expensive. So those are the main reasons. I again feel the need to reiterate, I'm optimistic long term. I do believe that nothing has changed structurally, and I believe that you know, I would not have bet against the businesses of cloud providers, and therefore, it remains an incredibly important and strategic part of our business. It's just gonna be a matter of time before we start to see the rebound and the recovery there. In enterprise, yes, we have seen, and I believe we'll continue to see strength. I've talked at length about Mist, so I'd be remiss not to mention also what's happening in our data center business. We had record Apstra revenue. Each Apstra sale, which is our automation solution for the data center, intent-based automation solution, is pulling meaningful hardware at this point in time. Apstra new logos have grown by 80% on a year-over-year basis, and the pipeline remains incredibly solid. Next year, the comparisons become more difficult in the enterprise, no doubt. This backlog draw in 2023 that Ken and I have both mentioned does affect enterprise as well. It's just that in the enterprise space, orders continue to be very robust, and we expect order growth next year. The path to revenue growth next year is much clearer, obviously, yeah, it becomes more difficult, you know, from a year-over-year standpoint, so you should just factor that into your model. Thank you. Thank you. That was all the questions we had today, and that does conclude today's conference. You may disconnect your lines at this time and have a wonderful day. Thank you for your participation.