Good morning ladies and gentlemen and welcome to the Knife River Corporation Second Quarter Results Conference Call. At this time all lines are in the listen only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question and answer session. If at any time during this call you require immediate assistance, please press star zero for the operator. Also note that this call is being recorded on Tuesday, August 5th, 2025, and I would like to turn the conference over to Nathan Ring, CFO. Please go ahead. Thank you and welcome to everyone joining us for the Knife River Corporation Second Quarter Results Conference Call. My name is Nathan Ring, Chief Financial Officer of Knife River, and I'm joined by our President and Chief Executive Officer, Brian Gray. Today's discussion will contain forward-looking statements about future operational and financial expectations. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in today's forward-looking statements. For further detail, please refer to today's earnings release and the risk factors disclosed in our most recent filings with the SEC, which are available on our website and the SEC website. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update our forward-looking statements. During this presentation, we will make references to certain non-GAAP information. These non-GAAP measures are defined and reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP measure in today's earnings release and investor presentation. These materials are also available on our website. Brian will begin today's call with an overview of our second quarter 2025 results, followed by a segment recap and an update on our competitive EDGE plan. Following his remarks, I will provide a product line summary, a capital update, and a review of our 2025 financial guidance. At the conclusion of our prepared remarks, we will open the line for a question- and- answer session. With that, I'll now turn the call over to Brian. Thank you, Nathan. Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us. Before I talk about our all-time record backlog and the progress we're making on our growth strategies, I want to address the slower start to the first half of 2025. Simply put, we had unfavorable weather throughout most of our footprint and we had fewer projects to bid and build in Oregon. Let me start with weather, where we had a difficult time getting out in the field to begin working through our record backlog. Rain plagued our operations throughout the Central segment and pockets of Montana and Wyoming. In key markets across those regions, it rained on nearly 40% of the available workdays, impacting revenue volumes and gross profit. Not only did weather negatively affect our construction revenue and materials volumes, it also impacted our energy services operations as it reduced shipments of liquid asphalt as we've discussed on previous earnings calls. We had favorable weather the past two construction seasons, but this year is causing substantial disruptions for our crews as they try to get to work. I'd like to pause for just a moment here and also recognize the tragic flooding that occurred in Texas over the 4th of July weekend. Torrential rain overwhelmed rivers and claimed innocent lives. Our hearts go out to the families who are coping with that loss. I'd also like to thank first responders for their heroic actions. Thankfully, our Texas team members were all safe. They are actively repairing our Honey Creek Quarry operations where flood waters washed out our access roads. In addition, the rail line servicing our quarry was damaged and is currently under reconstruction. Sales volumes will be down for the t hird quarter at Honey Creek as repairs a re made, but we expect to see strong demand once we start selling materials there. Again, this impact has been included in our revised guidance. The other factors for our slower start to the year was project availability in Oregon. On both the public and private side, we continue to see work being delayed. Over the past few years, the state DOT has heavily invested in several megaprojects that are over budget. This has diverted funding from paving work we typically perform. The state legislature has been called into special session later this month to address additional DOT funding, which we're watching closely. On the private side, macroeconomic factors including uncertainty around tariffs and high interest rates continue to affect Oregon's manufacturing and import export industries, prolonging delays on private projects. We continue to right size our crews and equipment pool in Oregon and have been mobilizing our teams to where the work is as we manage through the current demand environment. To provide some year-over-year context on Oregon, our aggregates volumes were down about 25% in the first half, or approximately 1.2 million tons. This is having a direct impact on our consolidated financial results. Over 50% of Knife River's EBITDA variance for the quarter, for the year- to- date, and to our updated guidance is directly related to Oregon. That said, we still expect the state to be a solid contributor. We anticipate Oregon's EBITDA margin, which has been Knife River's North Star for the past decade, will continue to be accretive to our overall results for the year. While Oregon has its challenges at the moment, there are many good things happening in our other 13 states. Let me start with the West, where we got off to a faster start in California, Hawaii, and Alaska. Aggregate volumes were up almost 60% this quarter in Alaska, while ready-mix volumes were up in both Hawaii and Alaska. In California, asphalt volumes were up along with contracting services revenue, which improved 30% over last year. We expect contracting services will continue to have a strong year in California, and we further expect volumes in all product lines to be up in California, Hawaii, and Alaska. I've stated several times that these states, which make up our legacy Pacific segment, have historically been a top contributor for Knife River. It's exciting to see their progress on our competitive EDGE initiatives. Finally, in the West, the State of Washington recently increased its transportation funding by over $2 billion, and we are seeing more opportunities to bid bridge work in that market o ut of our prestressed division. S witching to Mountain, we anticipate another solid year. As you can see in our quarterly and year-to-date performance, work was affected by our ability to get in the field due to weather and project timing, both causing a delayed start to the construction season. Also causing lower revenue and profitability this quarter is a lack of asphalt paving in Montana, as the DOT is spending a larger portion of its budget on bridge structures, but this region has all-time record backlog. The DOT budgets are strong, and we continue to see more opportunities to bid private work. Idaho approved funding during the quarter focused on relieving congestion, and we are seeing shovel-ready projects already coming up. We are currently working on the $95 million Farmway Road project in Boise and recently secured a $54 million interchange project in that same market. In Central, the acquisition of Strata drove record second quarter volumes, revenue, and EBITDA, and our quarterly results could have been even better if not for the rain. The integration of Strata is going well, and the guidance we provided earlier this year related to Strata remains on track. In North Dakota, the state passed a spending bill in the second quarter that allocates $800 million a year over the next two years for road construction projects. This work is right in our wheelhouse. Meanwhile, we are also seeing exceptional infrastructure investment in Texas. We're preparing for a $118 million multi-year highway project in College Station, where we are a material supplier and paving subcontractor. Our Texas team also landed a $33 million paving subcontract for a highway project in Madison County. Even though these projects are larger in size than traditional projects in our backlog, they are work we typically perform and have similar risk profiles. Finally, at Energy Services, volumes increased year-over-year with the acquisition of Albina Asphalt and the addition of our new polymer modified liquid asphalt plant in South Dakota. Wet weather in the Midwest and economic challenges in Oregon negatively impacted financial results in this segment for the quarter. However, we expect EBITDA margin at Energy Services to continue to be accretive to Knife River again this year. Looking ahead, we have many opportunities across our company as we move into the second half of the year. We have record backlog, a strong demand for our products, and several exciting EDGE updates. Our second quarter backlog of $1.3 billion is the highest of any quarter in Knife River history, and this wasn't just delayed work being pushed forward. We secured $650 million in new projects during the quarter, a $250 million increase from the same time last year. Record DOT budgets are driving record backlog. Approved budgets in Knife River states are growing 14% for fiscal year 2026 compared to just 3% for the U.S. average. Our 14 states also have about 60% of IHA funding still to spend, and we expect IHA to continue to positively impact our markets well past the bill expiration. As we enter our busiest quarter, we have a lot of work that should carry us through this year and into 2026. We expect our record backlog to drive volume growth across all product lines in the second half of this year. On top of strong budgets and record backlog, we also remain focused on our competitive EDGE strategy of EBITDA margin improvement, discipline, growth, and excellence. We are committed to achieving our long-term goal of 20% adjusted EBITDA margin, and we see multiple paths to get there. One of those paths is growth, and we have acquired two aggregates-led companies since the first quarter. In May, we purchased Kraemer Trucking and Excavating in St. Cloud, Minnesota. Kraemer provides infill growth for us in the central part of the state. It has nine sand and gravel sites to support our current footprint, along with a strategically located granite quarry on Interstate 94 that can serve the suburbs of Minneapolis. In July, we acquired High Desert Aggregate and Paving in Bend, Oregon. Bend's population has grown 8% in the last five years, and we expect this market to continue to grow faster than the national average. High Desert adds aggregate reserves along with downstream asphalt production and paving to help serve this area. Both these acquisitions align with our growth strategy. They are negotiated deals infilling our mid-sized, high-growth markets. They are aggregates-led, and they are able to quickly integrate into our system. We have maintained an active deal pipeline and will continue to pursue acquisitions as well as organic growth opportunities that fit our strategic goals. We also continue to invest in long-term growth through our process improvement teams or pit crews, and these crews are focused on self-help through standardization, cost control, price optimization, and pushing toward excellence in all we do. This takes time. We are still in the early stages on many of these initiatives, but we absolutely expect this investment to have a strong and sustainable return for our shareholders. Pit crews are an important part of our EDGE strategy. Another integral part of our strategy is materials pricing. In the second quarter, our teams improved pricing on aggregates, ready-mix concrete, and asphalt. Nathan will talk more about this in his remarks, but we continue to gain traction with the implementation of our dynamic pricing initiative along with new and improved technology to support it. All told, we have a lot of high-quality work in front of us, a proven strategy, and positive market fundamentals. We have record backlog of $1.3 billion that is secured work with dedicated public funding. There's bipartisan support at the federal, state, and local levels to continue the build out of America's infrastructure, and this is exactly the type of work we perform. We also continue to drive pricing improvements on construction materials as we roll out our commercial excellence initiatives. Finally, we have an incredible team that's laser focused on working safely, controlling our costs, and becoming best in class in everything we do. All of this gives me great confidence in our ability to deliver long-term value for our shareholders. With that, I will turn the call over to Nathan. Thank you Brian. As we review our product lines, the wet weather during the quarter and the Oregon economy put downward pressure on our financial results. Generally speaking, impacts from rain caused lower volumes and challenging operating conditions, leading to higher per unit fixed costs and compressed margins in our product lines. Additionally, the softening in Oregon shifted Knife River's overall revenue mix away from this higher margin market, which also impacted gross margins in our product lines. Beginning with contracting services, we saw an 8.5% decline in revenue for the quarter compared to last year. With a return to normal weather, we expect to get back in the field and focus on our core paving projects. As we look forward, we are encouraged to see that the states where we operate have DOT budgets growing faster than the U.S. average and that 10 of our 14 states are forecasting record DOT budgets for 2026. Our backlog continues to be primarily public work at about 90%, with approximately 80% expected to be completed within the next 12 months. Moving to asphalt, the delays we experienced in contracting services also impacted asphalt revenue, with volumes declining 9% for the quarter compared to the previous year. However, we were able to improve gross profit per ton by almost 8% as we maintained pricing discipline despite lower demand. We were also able to increase third- party sales within the quarter, and as paving work picks up in the second half, we anticipate that volumes will improve for the remainder of the year and that full year volumes will be in line with last year at comparable pricing. Aggregate revenue increased for the quarter compared to last year, benefiting from the acquisition of Strata and our continued pricing initiatives, which resulted in higher prices of almost 12%. However, as a result of headwinds previously mentioned, we experienced lower volumes along with production costs not fully absorbed into inventory, both of which had an impact on gross margin for the quarter. Looking ahead, with the recent addition of Strata and continued self help from the pit crew, we believe aggregate volumes and gross profit will keep improving and we expect full year results for volume to be up mid single digits and pricing to be up high single digits. Ready-mix volume and price improved for the quarter compared to the prior year, resulting in a 15% increase in revenue. Our Central segment saw the largest volume increase related to the recent acquisition of Strata, and West saw higher demand in Hawaii and Alaska. We also continue to benefit from dynamic pricing in this product line with an 8% price increase over last year. However, gross margin was affected by the revenue shift I mentioned earlier as we had less overall volumes from the higher margin Oregon market. Guidance for ready-mix concrete includes volume increases of low double digits and pricing increases of mid single digits. Moving from operations to Administration, SG&A increased $9.7 million for the quarter compared to the previous year and was in line with our expectations. The quarterly variance was primarily due to additional overhead costs of $10.6 million that came with the acquisitions we have made during the last 12 months. As anticipated, we also had higher business development costs of $1.9 million, which was offset by higher gains on asset sales. In previous quarters, we talked about a step up in SG&A of $20 million for this year related to business development costs and EDGE initiatives that we expect will help the company grow and improve margins. We also noted this amount will be front loaded to the beginning of 2025, and we have spent approximately $14 million on this step up through the first half. For the full year, we believe SG&A is still in line with what we had shared with you in the prior quarter, which is an increase of mid single digits over 2024 SG&A plus this $20 million step up and the additional overhead from our acquisitions. F or our capital allocation w e continue to put our balance sheet to work in maintaining and growing operations. Through the first half of 2025, we have spent $111 million maintaining, improving, and replacing our plant and equipment, and for the full year we anticipate our maintenance capital expenditures will still be 5%- 7% of revenue. We have also invested $620 million in acquisitions, growth projects, and reserve replacements that fit our vertically integrated aggregates-led strategy. In addition, we have $50 million approved for organic projects, which put our total growth spend at $670 million for 2025. Any additional acquisitions or new organic projects would be incremental to these amounts. We ended the quarter with nearly $1.4 billion of long-term debt, which includes $183 million borrowed on the revolver, putting our net leverage position at 3.1x. Keep in mind this is at the peak of our seasonal borrowing needs, and we anticipate the revolver will be fully repaid by year end. Based on our current EBITDA guidance, we expect that the net leverage position should end the year below our long-term target of 2.5x, keeping additional capacity for future strategic investments. As we consider our first half results and look at the remainder of the year, we are lowering the midpoint of our adjusted EBITDA guidance by $55 million. About 75% of that reduction is related to the first half, headwinds of a softer Oregon market, and wet weather. In the second half, we expect continued softness in Oregon and a lower EBITDA contribution from energy services to be largely offset by recapturing pre-production costs, taking advantage of paving opportunities, and benefiting from our recent acquisitions. Our updated guidance includes consolidated revenue between $3.1 billion and $3.3 billion, adjusted EBITDA between $475 million and $525 million, including geographic segments and corporate services between $425 million and $465 million, and energy services between $50 million and $60 million. With the exception of the flooding in Texas and the Oregon economy, both of which are included in this update, guidance is based on normal weather, economic, and operating conditions. The fundamentals of our business are strong, with roads in need of repair and funding to support our work at all-time highs, creating robust and ongoing demand for our services and materials. We believe we are well positioned to succeed with the continued implementation of our self-help initiatives and EDGE strategy, and we are excited about our future. I would now like to open the call for questions. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. If you do have any questions at this time, please press star followed by one on your touch-tone phone. You will then hear a prompt that your hand has been raised, and should you wish to decline from the polling process, please press star followed by two. If you're using a speakerphone, we do ask that you please lift the handset before pressing any keys. Please go ahead and press star one now if you have any questions. Your first question will be from Brent Thielman at D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead Br ent. Hey, thanks. Good morning team. I appreciate the bridge and the walk on the revisions to guidance. Was hoping maybe just in regard to the Oregon market. What you're sort of e xpecting here into the second half of the year, what are the green shoots that could happen in that market, Brian, and then just wanted to confirm that Strata this year. Yeah. Good morning, Brent. Yes, I'll answer that first one. Is this integration of Strata is going as planned? It's going actually very good. That original guidance we gave back three months ago of an increase of $45 million is still on track. As far as Oregon, a couple things have changed since last time we talked, Brent. As you know, the Oregon Legislature was trying to pass a comprehensive transportation funding bill. We were hopeful for that. Unfortunately, after a year of work on that, they closed the Legislature without passing a long-term comprehensive funding bill. Since then the governor has called the Legislature back into special session at the end of this month. Frankly, I don't think that is going to have any kind of positive impact on us as far as paving work that we do in the state of Oregon this year as it's just frankly going to be too late. I think it really is to avoid layoffs of DOT workers and so they can continue to work through the winter and plow in the snow. I think, you know, we are hopeful. The state of Oregon, their roads and bridges are in very poor shape. They have got to do something just like every state has gone through trying to find funding through gas taxes and other registration fees and very hopeful that they will accomplish that, you know, more comprehensively, possibly at the special session. Most likely next year the roads need fixed in Oregon. This is something they cannot kick the can down the road very long or it's going to result in even higher costs. That's on the DOT side of it, Brent. Also, since we last talked, we had a number of projects that were on. We were told that those projects would start sometime in June or July. As we are here this morning in August, only one of that list of projects has started again. Most of those projects are still on pause. Only one has been canceled, one has started. The rest of them are still on hold. That is a change since we last talked and it's been baked into our guidance as Nathan mentioned or as I mentioned, you know, more than 50% of our revision to our guidance is because of Oregon. More than 50% of our quarterly and year to date variances is also from Oregon. It's definitely having an impact on us. Oh crap. Yeah, appreciate that, Brian. On the, I mean, good to see the record backlog here. There are some comments here m argins may be somewhat lower. Is that a consequence of the work you're taking? Is it more competitive? Was just wondering around what factors might drive lower margins there. Yeah, part of that is, I mean just as we shift revenue from regions, as you know, Oregon has been the North Star as it relates to our margins. There are a lot of, you know, good things happening in Oregon still and they're still going to be accretive to our overall margins. As we shift revenue from Oregon into other regions, that's part of that lower margins in our backlog. Just some of those larger jobs that we picked up, multi-year projects. When you pick up those larger jobs, Brent, sometimes they come at lower margins, but also those larger jobs have a lot of opportunities for value engineering and bonus potential. We're excited about our $1.3 billion backlog. That'd be the reason for those slightly lower margins in our backlog. Okay, last one. I mean the aggregates ASP, really impressive here, particularly relative to what we've seen around the industry. I guess your views on sustaining that. I see your outlook for the year, but you know, do you chalk it up to just the discipline that's happening at the ground and focus on price, dynamic pricing? Is it mix this quarter? Just any help there would be good. I think definitely want to give credit to our team and our discipline in implementing dynamic pricing that is gaining traction. The addition of Strata has helped our average selling price. Our average selling price does include freight, does include different product mix. We did raise our guidance from mid single digit pricing because of the continued momentum that we're seeing in dynamic pricing. We raised that up to high single digits. We are very pleased with those fundamentals, Brent, that will last for a long time. That is a very positive sign for our aggregates division. Very good. I'll pass on. Thank you. Thank you. Next question will be from Kathryn Thompson at Thomson Research Group. Please go ahead Katherine. Hi, thank you for taking my questions today. Wanted to follow up on your Strata, Albina acquisitions and just in terms of how are they performing in the quarter, really focusing on their organic volume and pricing for both of those acquisitions. You've given some color in terms of how they'll contribute going forward, but pulling the string a little bit more in terms of clarification and quantifying t he i mpact going forward for both. Thank you. Yeah, thank you, Kathryn. No, we're very excited and pleased with the progress we're making on both of those acquisitions. The integration is going well. They are materials-led businesses that fit very well in our EDGE strategy. They both have contributed to our seasonality in the first half of the year. As you know, Strata is located in the northern part of our footprint and so that has added to our seasonality both in the first quarter, which we only had them for a couple of weeks in the first quarter, but certainly adds to our seasonality in the second quarter, as does Albina Asphalt. I mean, they're selling liquid asphalt for asphalt paving projects in the Pacific Northwest, and so they have added to our seasonality. We don't provide specific guidance and financial results for individual business units, but I think it is helpful to provide some color and just directionally the impact that those two companies are having on us. The revenue from these two operations, Strata and Albina, for the second quarter accounted for about 8% of our total revenue for the quarter. Keeping in mind they are more seasonal again, so they're going to ramp up even more in the third and fourth quarters. I think putting that another way, Kathryn, if you just look at our consolidated revenue for Knife River, it would have been down 5% for the quarter without the impact of Albina and Strata's revenue. Strata and Albina accounted for about 8% of our revenue for the quarter, and without those sales, our organic revenue would have been down about 5%. I'll just add a tiny bit more color and detail around the volumes of Strata. As you know, they're aggregates-led and they have a large ready-mix presence, and so just the impact of those two business units, both of them are about 10% of our annual sales. If you look at our annualized sales last year, Strata for aggregates volumes and for ready-mix volumes would be about 10% of Knife River's consolidated annualized volumes. That gives you a little bit of flavor on the impact that those volumes have that we've added back in March are having on our overall consolidated financial statements. Did that answer your question, Kathryn? Yes, it did. On a go forward basis, how do you think about the magnitude of the contribution for Q3, which you had noted is a higher relative contribution on an annualized basis? I think it, you know, it's. Going to be, you know, right now they made up 8% in the quarter. They are more seasonal. I see that ticking up. That would be similar in line with kind of the aggregates and ready-mix contribution in that 10% range. I think as you look at our, we reconfirmed the guidance that we provided on Strata. That's in that 9%, 10% of our overall EBITDA for the year. I think if you look at margins and contributions from those two acquisitions going forward, we've publicly stated in the past that Albina, until it becomes fully integrated into our energy services model, probably slightly dilutive. You know, on the Strata acquisition, we've mentioned in the past that that's going to be accretive to our margins. I think looking forward, going forward as far as EBITDA contribution and into the second half of the year, that might provide you some additional color. Okay, and just to clarify, I believe you said this earlier, the prepared commentary, the first follow up, part of the reason for the aggregate pricing raised guidance is in part due to these two acquisitions, is that correct in hearing that? Yeah, for Strata, yes, Albina is strictly liquid asphalt supplier. Yes, all piece of that is from Strata, but a bigger, larger piece is just the continued traction and implementation of our dynamic pricing throughout all of our regions. Very pleased with the progress we're making on that initiative. Okay, great. Following up on Oregon, I appreciate the color that you had previously on that, but just the clarification on the public side, you know, we've seen a lot of states, many states over the past several years come to a head with funding infrastructure. Several, including Tennessee, where we're based, had a reckoning moment where they had the overall infrastructure funding work out. Where do you put Oregon in terms of that journey towards the reckoning of reassessing infrastructure funding for the state? Yeah, I think the good news is e verybody understands the need for the funding. I think the hard part is where's it going to come from and, you know, whether it's gas tax or registration fees and the accountability of the current dollars that are going into ODOT from the gas taxes, they've got some challenges. They have several large mega projects that are over budget. I think that they need to get some, you know, some better trust with the legislatures and the general public. There's no doubt that the roads, everybody on both sides of the aisle, there's bipartisan support. The taxpayers understand the need for infrastructure investment. They're going through that process right now. I think, like I mentioned, there was a lot of hope and a lot of traction that they would get that done about a month ago. They've been working on it for a full year. They had road shows across the state. They built the momentum and support that people understood the need for infrastructure investment. Unfortunately, they did not get it across the finish line. We will be paying close attention to the special session that's been called for later this month. The results of that will continue to work during the off season to get something more meaningful passed. You're right, Kathryn. Every state goes through this cycle. Fortunately for us, we have many states that have been successful, whether that's North Dakota or Texas or Washington, Idaho. That is more than offsetting what's going on in Oregon. Just to remind you, we are in 14 states and Oregon is one. We'll talk a lot about it probably today because of the impact it is having, w e have record backlog and the fundamentals are the same in Oregon as they are in other states. The roads need to be repaired. We just need to find the funding to get it and we'll get that done in Oregon. Actually, as you described, it sounds a little bit like Georgia and what happened where they had a failed referendum and did the same course, which resulted in going back and an overhaul of funding. All right, thanks very much and I'll jump back in the queue. Thank you, Kathryn. Next question will be from Trey Grooms at Stephens Inc. Please go ahead, Trey. Yep. Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for all the color on this. There's a lot of moving pieces as we kind of move into the back half of the year. You mentioned Strata. You're going to see a pickup here this quarter and continuing into fourth. There's some moving pieces around Oregon, understand all that. Is there anything or any way you can help us kind of maybe fine tune the cadence or seasonality that's kind of in the back half of this year as we look at third quarter and fourth, and then understanding, not to bring 2026 into the picture just yet, but just understanding the increased seasonality that Strata and, you know, specifically Strata brings to the table. This year being really abnormal, maybe from a weather standpoint, is there any way that just kind of pro forma the Strata acquisition that we can think about just typical seasonality? I don't know if it's from a, you know, percent of total standpoint for each quarter or just any kind of broad strokes on that, because I think we were a little off on calibrating the seasonality. Any help there would be great. Yeah, I think the thing that compounded that problem more than anything is the weather that we had in those regions. It was wet up in North Dakota and Minnesota and throughout much of our central footprint. That definitely compounded the seasonality, but just the sheer footprint of the Strata acquisition. I mean, we disclosed in the first quarter that it had about a 200- 300 basis point impact on our seasonality in Q1. I would say that that's going to be similar in Q2, maybe 100- 200 basis points for our seasonality of not just Strata, but again, Albina. We don't really get going on a lot of asphalt paving in the Pacific Northwest until the middle part of that second quarter, call it April, beginning of May. Yes, we have added to our seasonality curve going forward that will carry into next year. Compounding the problem this year was just the number of rain days that we lost to production and then just some timing of some asphalt paving projects. Trey compounded that as well. Looking going forward, assuming normal weather, I think that the new cadence for our seasonality would be reflective of 1%- 2% off of our five-year history in the first quarter and 1- 2 percentage points less in the second quarter, pushing mostly primarily into the third quarter with a small pickup in the fourth quarter. I think that would get into your question. Yep. Yeah, okay, Brian, that's helpful. There's been. A lot of talk about Oregon, clearly, and I understand that's important. To your point earlier, you guys are in a lot of other places besides Oregon. You named, you know, Alaska, California, Hawaii, seeing some positives there. Can you maybe talk about just generally your overall footprint, you know, where you're seeing some of the, you know, the positives? Again, you name some of these states, but kind of what's driving some of those and maybe across your footprint where you're seeing some strength versus just the headwind that we're seeing in Oregon. No, I appreciate that. We have, as you know, over 90% of our backlog is public funding. We continue to see record DOT funding in almost all of those states. In fact, if you look at the budgets and you mentioned 2026, the states that we're in, with the exception of Oregon, DOT funding is up 14% in 2026 as far as our budgets. That compares to the rest of the United States at 3%. We do continue to see a lot of strong funding, strong demand in the public environment. That is a large piece of our backlog, over 90%. As you know, the nice thing about that is those are dedicated dollars in a lockbox. We've not seen, even in Oregon through this challenging time, any of those DOT jobs that are in our backlog get canceled. That is very secure work. As you mentioned, there are a lot of other things in our material sales. About half of our aggregate sales go to third- parties to private work. The majority of our ready-mix goes out. We are up in California, Hawaii, and Alaska in those product lines. For the most part, we are seeing a lot of opportunities. We continue to see activity up in Alaska around the gold mines. There's a large airport project up there. Tourism in both those states, in Hawaii and Alaska, are rebounding. We've got a lot of multi-housing commercial work going on in Hawaii. The big job in Hawaii, and unfortunately for eight and continues to be slightly delayed, is the large dry dock at Pearl Harbor. We have mobilized a ready-mix plant on site, but we have not seen any production out of that. That's pushing out to late third quarter, early fourth quarter. The legacy Pacific region, California, Hawaii, and Alaska are doing well. Idaho has record backlog. Idaho continues to find funding for public works and continues to let large jobs. There's good private work. The semiconductor business is moving into Boise. The data centers in Wyoming, the wind projects in Wyoming. Lots of opportunities, frankly. That mountain region is one of our fastest growing regions. Central continues the integration of Strata into Knife River's footprint. The funding at the DOT levels in almost all of those states has been positive. Texas just continues to see some large projects that have high pull-through of our materials business, and in the private development, it's just been strong throughout that central region. As far as the end markets, there are things going on in all of our different markets. Perfect, that's super helpful, Brian. If I could touch on one last thing, not sure if you mentioned it. Two bolt-on acquisitions, if you could maybe touch on those and kind of what they mean to the strategy and how they fit, and then maybe your appetite for M&A. Just, you know, where we are with the Strata integration and just where we are in kind of the cycle. Thank you. Yeah, we've been very focused on the Strata integration and our COO and I talk about the schedule that we are on as far as integrating Strata, and we put together a very detailed schedule of synergies that we expected to get out of that, our large [River,] a 30, 60, 90 day, 180 day schedule of those synergies. I'll just tell you that I've been very pleased at where we're at and the progress and the traction that we get. We have and we've done over 90 acquisitions, so we have a proven playbook. The two smaller acquisitions I mentioned, KTE, which is in the St. Cloud, Minnesota area, also has a quarry on I-94 that would service the suburbs of Minneapolis. The High Desert Paving operations in central Oregon has both of them are [audio distortion]. High Desert has some asphalt plants and some paving that goes along with it. Those projects are those deals again. are in our wheelhouse. They are deals that are reflective of every deal that we've done since we've spun, negotiated deals in a single digit multiple that are in mid-sized high growth markets. They infill our existing footprint, they're materials led, and we can quickly integrate and capture those synergies. Very excited about those two opportunities, and our pipeline continues to be full. Our business development team is out continually looking at deals that fit that strategy of ours, and we're going to continue to grow. Very excited about the progress that we've made and look forward to future announcements. All right, thanks Brian. It's all great color. T hank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, to accommodate questions from as many callers as possible, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Thank you. Your next question will be from Ian Zaffino at Oppenheimer. Please go Ian. Great, awesome. Thank you very much. You know, question would be just to r eturn to pricing, how far along are we on the dynamic pricing? If you look at kind of across the portfolio, maybe on a percentage basis, and just given how strong the quarter was as far as pricing, what kind of explains the step down that the guide, even though the guide's raised, still kind of assumes a little bit of a step down. Wondering what that was, and then just swipe them one more. It kind of feeds into this as you throw out the 20% number again. How are you thinking about that and getting there as far as either timing, and then just Oregon, then just delay the timing of maybe potentially achieving that 20%. Yep. I think on the pricing, as far as where we're at with dynamic pricing, it's a little bit different like we've talked about in the past, I mentioned that Strata, I mean, we've honored the pricing and we've not. We're beginning to implement dynamic pricing. Part of the fundamentals, part of dynamic pricing is that we don't send out the price increase letters. When we acquired them in March, we were at the very beginning process of implementing dynamic pricing throughout Strata. That's something that's still upside that we'll see next year. They've got good pricing. It's just a different model. This is more the traditional model. We'll be moving to dynamic pricing all the way to the northwest region where dynamic pricing came from. They're probably in that eighth or ninth inning. We've got other segments, other regions, other states that are still in that second and third a s we kind of build out our sales team, do training, implement the new tools that we have, the new software that we've got. Generally speaking, I would say that Knife River, the progress we're making, the traction we're getting with dynamic pricing, the tools that we're putting in place, the dashboards that we are monitoring, I would say that we're 50% of the way there on dynamic pricing. I would say that I'm excited and see the momentum that we are raising our pricing guidance from mid single up to high single to reflect that traction. Keep in mind, the first and second quarter are not our biggest quarters. As we look forward in the third quarter and as we look at the Central region coming online with more volumes, kind of back to that region mix, those numbers will shift. As we look at just our same source sales, the one product at the same pit, I think high single digits are more reflective than the low double digits that we've seen currently as we look at the next six months. Those are incredible numbers. High single digits for pricing is very positive momentum. It's a key pathway for us to get to that 20% flag that you talk about. A big part of our EDGE strategy is to continue to increase the percent of our revenue into aggregates and to continue to optimize our pricing and maximize the total EBITDA contribution and aggregates is an important part of that. You can see that in our largest acquisition to date, Strata. You can see that in KT and High Desert. We're going to continue to look at those opportunities. Ian, we've identified a number of different paths to get there to 20%. Oregon is a temporary setback, but that's why we are diverse both geographically and by product lines. We like our strategy and we can get to 20% with where Oregon is currently at. It ebbs and flows. I mentioned to you, Ian, in the past that I've looked up to the Pacific region, the legacy Pacific, California, Hawaii, Alaska as being one of our north stars for a long time. The progress that we're making on our EDGE strategy and the overall economy in those states, they've had a fantastic year. If you look at the West segment, it almost completely overshadows what's going on in Oregon and that's a very positive thing. Multiple paths to get to 20% i s a long-term goal that we continue to be focused on. I can tell you that our management team and everybody out in the field at Knife River are laser focused on all aspects of that EDGE strategy to get to that long-term 20% goal. All right, thank you very much. Thanks, Ian. Next question will be from Garik Shmois at Loop Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Garik. Oh, hi. Thanks. Sorry if some of these questions are redundant. My call was dropped earlier, but I wanted to follow up on contracting services. Just the increase in the number of larger jobs in your backlog, is that just something that was opportunistic over the last quarter based on what was coming up for bid? Are you generally seeing larger projects coming up? Maybe there's a mix shift happening, or is it maybe a change in just overall strategy to go after larger projects as opposed to, you know, some of the smaller maintenance work they used to do? Yeah, definitely not a change in strategy. I mean, the majority of our backlog continues to be projects less than $5 million. This is really a result of DOTs deciding internally to maybe be more efficient to manage one larger project and, you know, have just one set of, you know, project schedules and contractors on a site. We are, I mean, part of that is maybe trying to get a lot of this IHA that still there's, you know, almost 50% that needs to be spent through the system in these larger projects. We are subcontractors on the largest projects that we've taken on. The big job that we have in Texas, it's work that we do, it's asphalt paving and supplying materials. Our risk profile on these projects, I mean this is something that we've seen coming for a while, Garik. In fact, we've been talking about it probably for the last two or three quarters that we see larger projects being let by DOTs and we will take. A look at those. I mean, we bid some of those as prime contractors, but it's not different type of work, it's not different risk profiles. It really is the work that we do. The nice thing about it is a multi-year project like this. These projects, large projects, we have the ability to have price protections and pre-purchase and lock in on our pricing and have escalations built into them. It's also secured backlog for the next couple of years on some of these projects. You did see a shift in the amount of backlog that we burn in any one year down to that, about 80% now. Okay, that's helpful. Follow up question is just on the weather impacts and how we should think about your ability to recover the volumes that were delayed from the first half of the year. Should we expect some of that to bleed into 2026? I was hoping you could provide some color on how July has trended. Recognizing Texas, there was severe flooding, so you've called that out. Other public aggregates and some companies have spoken to strong demand so far in July I'm wondering if you're seeing a similar rebound in markets where weather has n ot been an issue. Yeah. Yeah. With the exception of our Honey Creek facility that has been shut down for the majority of all of July and continues to be shut down and will be through part of August, the demand is strong, the backlog is there, the demand is strong. Our weather has been mixed, frankly, in July and we've had very favorable weather in a portion of our footprint. There are still pockets that continue to get rain. This is the time of year where it's a little bit easier, it dries out faster. It doesn't rain quite as much typically this time of year. A lot of times they're just, you know, thunderstorms that come through causing some rain that we can typically work our way through. The overall demand is strong and I'm pleased to see with, you know. Where we're at on our volumes for July. I think that's reflective when we put our guide together, you know, for this call for in all product lines. I think that is reflect. We did take July into consideration for that guidance for the rest of the year. Okay, thanks. I'll leave it there. I appreciate it. Yep. Thank you. Next question will be from Chris Ellinghaus at Siebert William Shank. P lease g o ahead, Chris. Hi, guys. How are you? Good morning. Brian, y ou sort of talked about Oregon and coming back to the legislature. It makes perfect sense that it doesn't aid 2025 very much. Do you expect, you know, sort of Oregon state conditions to revert to normal for 2026? Yeah, I'm hopeful, Chris, but the reality is, typically you don't pass comprehensive transportation funding in a short special session. I would suspect that there'll be some stopgap funding that they accomplish at the special session and that the legislature meets every year in Oregon. They'll be back in session again at the beginning of next year. I'm more hopeful that they will figure that out. What I can tell you is, again, that the need is there. There's an analysis that was done by the DOT that identifies almost $988 million of a shortfall to get the roads and the bridges up to an adequate, fair condition. There's a report out there right now that the DOT, the cycle that they're maintaining and replacing bridges is every 900 years. These bridges were designed to last 50- 75 years. They have to fix this problem. As you know, Chris, the longer you delay maintaining these infrastructures, the cost of repairs and maintenance just goes up exponentially, requiring more materials. Not good. I'm a taxpayer in Oregon. Not good for a taxpayer. As a construction material supplier and a contractor that does that type of work, it's going to require even more materials. This is not a speculative problem. I think the challenge is finding ways to fund the transportation bill. They will do that. I don't necessarily think they'll do that at the special session at the end of the month, but they will do that sooner or later. How does that impact 2026 yet, Chris? I don't know. I would say I'll know more at the end of this month. We'll update everybody at the next quarterly call, and we'll know more. Kind of the progress that we're making in Oregon as far as the DOT funding. Okay, great. That helps in the quarter. I want to say that math due to the weather impacts. Can you just sort of. It seems like Strata must have been pretty significantly accretive to margins. Can you just sort of talk about what you saw from Strata in the second quarter, and how did it match up versus your sort of expectations? Yeah, I mean, other than the impact. They had to weather, and there was absolutely an impact to Strata from weather, but everything else that we're seeing with the integration, with their sales volumes, it's right on plan. That's why we're maintaining the guidance for Strata to continue to contribute that $45 million that's baked into our guide going forward. The revision to our guide does not. There is no negative impact. Frankly, if you look at our range within our guide, I would say that one of the ways we hit the upside, the high end of that range, is we are excited at what we're seeing at the Strata acquisition. There's nothing there that has been alarming. There's no surprises. We can't control the weather, but we can control our pricing, our bid room strategies of quality over quantity, all of the EDGE principles. They've embraced those principles at Strata. It's on track, Chris. I just say that it's on track. Okay. Can I sneak in one really quick question? Are you guys working on the Micron projects in Idaho? There's probably some opportunities for us. We are in conversations as they continue to look at, you know, getting that project back on track. I would say that we are in conversations with the team at Micron. Okay, great. Thanks a bunch.. Okay, great. Thanks a bunch.. Okay, great. Thanks a bunch.. Appreciate it. Yep. Next question will be from Gabe Hajde at Wells Fargo Securities. Please go ahead, Gabe. Brian and Nathan, good morning. Morning. Three questions. One is, and I know there's been a lot of airtime on Oregon, and maybe unfair to ask it this way. Can you kind of give us a t a state level, what it's down or what you're projecting it to be down, that's embedded in your guidance year-over-year. If nothing changes as it relates to funding, perhaps what that kind of, you know, the run rate into 2026, you know, have we seen all the, we'll call it max pain, or would there be something in Q1 that would come out of it? I'm assuming not much because of the s easonality of the business. Yeah, you know, we don't provide individual state guidance and I probably won't do that h ere, Gabe, what I can tell you is that if you look at our variance, the negative variance year-over-year for the quarter for the first half of this year and the update to our guidance, the $55 million reduction in the guidance that we've said that more than 50% of that variance for the quarter for the year into the guide is directly related to what's going on in Oregon. I think there's too many unknowns at this point in time to start speculating what's going to go on in 2026. I can tell you that the list of projects that we have that are on hold, the majority of those, all but one, are still on hold. They've not been canceled. I think we'll know more in three months and certainly we'll update everybody as far as the progress on where we're at in Oregon. I think that's the best way of looking at the impact to Oregon. Keep in mind they have industry, they have the highest margins within all of Knife River. There's a lot of very good things that are going on. They are very well equipped in Oregon to deal with the headwinds there. I can tell you that that management team is right sizing their crews, their equipment. We're mobilizing both crews and equipment to other parts of the company to try to keep people busy. We are managing our way through this temporary short- term headwind that we have in Oregon. I would expect nothing less. You guys are dynamic folks. Interesting commentary on the backlogs you mentioned. I think putting $650 million into the backlog, I'm assuming that was during the second quarter. It was up $250 million. I'm just mathematically that would assume you put $400 million into your backlog in the second quarter of 2024. Maybe confirming in nature of a question, was Strata in that already, given timing of when you closed it, would it have a material impact on backlog? Can you talk about maybe just geographically where some of that incremental $250 million is sitting? Yeah. There is no backlog from Strata back in 2Q of last year, so that would all be incremental. It's somewhere in that $50 million, $60 million of backlog that we had from Strata that we added to our overall backlog. The majority of what we picked up, the gain, the $250 million, $250 million increase year-over-year. You're right. You did the math right, that we had very close to. We gained $400 million in backlog last year. This year, we secured $650 million of new backlog. I said that right? Yes. A lot of that came from some larger projects, two of them down in Texas, one in Idaho. We secured a nice job down at Conley Pacific down in Southern California. I mean, really, it's across the board. If you look at the states that we operate in, they all have very strong DOT funding. There's a lot of opportunities for us to continue to pick up backlog. I think one of the upsides, and again in our guide, is oftentimes this is the time of year where we'll start seeing some late jobs come out. The good news for us is we've got capacity to take on more backlog. We'll continue to look at those opportunities that continue to add more backlog. It really came from, across all of our footprint, it came from some larger projects that we picked up down in Texas and Idaho. A portion of that did come from Strata. Okay, and last one, I may have missed it. There's a lot going on this quarter, and you throw out a lot of numbers. The Strata acquisition, around $450 million. I think you said $675 million between the other two acquisitions that you've done and maybe some strategic capital. I just want to make sure. I heard you correctly. If I did my math right on these other two deals, is that adding, on an annualized basis, another $20 million- $25 million of EBITDA? Yeah, I'll let Nathan take on that question for us. Yeah, Gabe, good to hear from you. From the standpoint of what kind of capital have we invested on the acquisition side? I'll put that entirely into the growth bucket. For the course of the year, Strata was the largest piece, as you noted, $454 million was the announced purchase price. We've done other acquisitions since then. The total is $620 million through the year, that's through June, that we have spent on growth projects. That's acquisitions, that's growth reserve replacements, and organic projects that we have going on elsewhere. We have another that we're looking at for the remainder of the year that relates to an organic project that we have. If you want to put that whole growth bucket together for 2025, we're looking at $670 million. That would be related to that. On the maintenance capital, if you want to put the whole capital piece together, we spend about $111 million on maintenance capital. Just like in the past, this year is the same thing. We're anticipating that our maintenance capital expenditures would be 5%- 7% of revenue. Those two pieces, Gabe, would give you an idea of how much we have going invested into the company. Remember, along with that, we did take on $500 million of term loan B to help fund the Strata acquisition. The rest is funded with internal sources of cash. I know you're probably looking at the net leverage, wondering if we've got a limitation there. As we move through the rest of the year and take on the EBITDA, as we announced with the midpoint of our guidance and pay off the revolver, we'll be in a net leverage position compared to EBITDA, probably close to two, leaving additional capacity for us to pursue other acquisitions, greenfield projects this year and into next year. Does that help, Gabe? It does. Thank you. Thanks, Gabe. Our last question comes from Ivan Yi at Wolfe Research. Please go ahead, Ivan. Good morning, guys. Thanks for squeezing me in. Going back to the cadence of guidance, how much revenue and EBITDA are you e xpecting in 3Q vs 4Q? Just want to see if we should assume anything outside of normal seasonality there. Yeah, we have a seasonality chart that we take a look at. Within the first two quarters, we're generally, and I'll take a look at it in terms of EBITDA and revenue is relatively close to that. We're probably around 20% for both first quarter and second quarter, about 20% of our revenue and EBITDA comes from that quarter. Close to 80% almost of our EBITDA comes in that third quarter time frame, with the remainder coming in the fourth quarter. On a revenue basis, that third quarter is close to 40% of our revenue. On an EBITDA basis, about 56% of our EBITDA comes in that third quarter. Does that help? I'll kind of go through again. Yeah. For the remainder of the year, we're probably looking at close to 60%. I'll say it this way, for the rest of the year, we're looking at about 60% of our revenue coming in the third and fourth quarter. That's our historical, you know, curve line. For EBITDA, it's probably closer to, you know, 70% of that. With the seasonality changes we've got here, it's probably a little bit higher than what it's been historically with the addition of Strata and Albina. That's very helpful. Lastly, can you discuss how roughly transportation costs are trending, also roughly what percentage of your shipments are moved on trucks versus rails? I just want to see which modes are seeing greater pricing increases right now. Thank you so much. Yeah, I can take the, the. Overall cost piece of that and then we can get into the transportation component. I would say on the whole, our cost structure, when you're taking a look, whether it's labor, trucking, equipment, get into energy, on the whole those are probably mid single digit increases year-over-year as far as the inputs. What you might be looking at on the other side though is okay, wait a minute, your cost per unit is going up. That really is a reflection of lower volumes on fixed cost components. Even though our input costs are mid single digits, we've got lower volumes. We did talk a little bit about weather and that does impact our efficiencies to some degree. You can imagine working in the rain is not as cost effective as working in dry weather. Along with that, we did continue to have some pre- production costs. On the whole, input costs still sitting around that mid single digits for the quarter. I'd say this is temporary. Our cost per units are higher as far as our production costs as it specifically relates to transportation. Yeah, the majority of our material is still delivered by truck. We do a fair amount of rail in Texas, we do rail operations in Oregon, we got rail up in Alaska. The exciting thing about adding Strata is they move a lot of their aggregates by rail. They've had a very good strategy on rail for years. Those rail movements will continue to increase. Right now the majority of our material is delivered by trucking. Thank you so much. Thank you. At this time I would like to turn the call back over to Brian Gray. Yeah, just like to thank you all again for joining us today. Our second quarter was largely impacted by factors out of our control, but we continue to make good progress on our EDGE initiatives and believe we are well positioned to grow our company and deliver long- term value for our shareholders. We appreciate the interest and support. Will now turn the call back over to the operator. Thank you. Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, this does indeed conclude your conference call for today. Once again, thank you for attending, and at this time we do ask that you please disconnect your line.