Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. My name is Brent, and I will be your conference operator today. At this time, I would like to welcome everyone to the third quarter 2023 Kinsale Capital Group, Inc. earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question at that time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, again, press star one. Thank you. Before we get started, let me remind everyone that through the course of the teleconference, Kinsale's management may make comments that reflect their intentions, beliefs, and expectations for the future. As always, these forward-looking statements are subject to certain risk factors, which could cause actual results to differ materially. These risk factors are listed in the company's various SEC filings, including the 2022 annual report on Form 10-K, which should be reviewed carefully. The company has furnished a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission that contains the press release announcing its third quarter results. Kinsale's management may also reference certain non-GAAP financial measures in the call today. A reconciliation of GAAP to these measures can be found in the press release, which is available at the company's website at www.kinsalecapitalgroup.com. I will now turn the conference over to Kinsale's President and CEO, Mr. Michael Kehoe. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone. Bryan Petrucelli, our CFO, and Brian Haney, our COO, and I will each make a few comments and then move on to any questions that you may have. In the third quarter, 2023, Kinsale's operating earnings per share increased by 103.6%, and gross written premium grew by 33% over the third quarter, 2022. For the quarter, the company posted a combined ratio of 74.8%, and it posted an operating ROE of 32.1% for nine months. The company's strategy of disciplined E&S underwriting and technology-enabled low costs drive these results and allows us to generate attractive returns and take market share from competitors at the same time. We believe these advantages have real durability to them, and consequently, we're optimistic about future prospects for both profitability and growth. The E&S market continues to benefit from the inflow of business from standard companies and from rate increases driven by inflation and tighter underwriting conditions. Brian Haney will offer some commentary on underwriting conditions in a moment, but on the topic of top-line premium growth, I'll note that the fluctuation in our growth rate from the second to the third quarter this year was due to normal quarterly variability and also due to a change in the flow of southeastern wind-driven property accounts from the second to the third quarter. Our growth rate through nine months of almost 46% this year is largely consistent with what we've experienced for the last five years, kind of plus or minus 40% growth year-over-year. Our near-term view of the E&S market continues to be bullish. Of course, we also like to remind investors that extraordinary growth rates that we've experienced for the last five years are an anomaly in a mature industry like property casualty insurance. Although we are optimistic about E&S market conditions for the balance of 2023 and heading into 2024, we believe the longer term growth rate for Kinsale will moderate to the 10%-20% range as market competition returns to normal in the years ahead. Should always be a concern for investors in a P&C insurance company, and as we have stated in the past, at Kinsale, we strive to set reserves for future claims in a conservative fashion so that we are more likely to have set aside more than enough and are likely to see a steady flow of reserve redundancy as claims are resolved over the years ahead. This focus on conservative reserving is especially important in a time of high inflation, which can stress prior year reserve adequacy, as we've experienced a bit in our 2016 to 2018 accident years on some of our longer tail lines of business. We believe Kinsale's reserves are more conservatively positioned now than at any time in our company's history, and investors should have a high level of confidence in the Kinsale balance sheet. Finally, a quick update on our real estate project. As you recall, we purchased two office buildings and vacant land adjacent to our existing headquarters building for $77.5 million in December 2022. We closed on the sale of one of those two buildings in the third quarter for $62 million, realizing a small gain in the process. We will begin renovations on the other, largely vacant building soon and expect to occupy that within two years. Additionally, we expect to sell other development sites on the adjacent property over the next several years, generating additional return on our investment. And with that, I'll turn the call over to Bryan Petrucelli. Thanks, Mike. Another solid quarter with 33% growth in written premiums, very low cat activity, and net income and net operating earnings increasing by 130.8% and 103.6% respectively. Mike commented on the 32.1% operating return on equity for the nine months. We do have around $155 million in unrealized losses net of taxes on our fixed income portfolio, generated from the higher interest rate environment, and that temporarily reduces our GAAP equity. Operating return on equity is 27.4% for the nine months when holding our fixed income investments at cost. Again, as we've stated in the past, we intend to and have the ability to hold our fixed income investments to maturity. The 74.8% combined ratio for the quarter included 3.2 points from net favorable prior year loss reserve development, compared to 5.1 points last year, with less than a half point coming from cat losses this quarter, compared to 12.2 points in the third quarter of last year, primarily from Hurricane Ian. The 20.9% quarterly expense ratio continues to benefit from higher ceding commissions from the company's casualty and commercial property proportional reinsurance agreements as a result in growth in both of those areas. This benefit was offset slightly by higher variable compensation accruals during the quarter. To support the continued strong top-line growth, we secured an additional $50 million in fixed rate debt during the quarter that will be used as capital at the insurance company level. This should put us in good, a good capital position for the remainder of 2023 and into 2024. Additionally, we used the proceeds from the real estate sale that Mike previously mentioned to pay down a good chunk of our revolving credit facility. As a result, our debt to total cap ratio decreased to approximately 17.8%, from approximately 21% at the end of 2022. On the investment side, net investment income increased by 95.5% over the third quarter last year, as a result of continued growth in the investment portfolio and higher interest rates, with a gross return of 3.9% for the year to date so far, compared to 2.7% last year. We're continuing to invest new money in shorter duration securities, with new money yields averaging between 5.5% and 6%, and duration decreasing slightly to 2.9 years, down from 3.5 years at the end of 2022. And lastly, diluted operating earnings per share continues to improve, and was $3.31 per share for the quarter, compared to $1.64 per share last year. And with that, I'll pass it over to Brian Haney. Thanks, Brian. As Mike mentioned earlier, premium grew 33% in the third quarter and 46% year to date. Also, growth rate for the quarter was affected by seasonality in the market for hurricane-exposed property. Insurers tend to avoid effective dates during wind season if there are major exposures to hurricanes. That being said, the E&S market remains favorable, with strong growth across much of our product line. In addition to our commercial property division, we are seeing strong growth in our entertainment, general casualty, excess casualty, and commercial auto divisions. Products liability and management liability lag somewhat, partly due to more intense competition, particularly from MGAs, and partly due to the effects of the economy and higher interest rates. Submission growth continues to be strong, again, in the low 20% range, slightly higher than the first and second quarters. We view submissions as a leading indicator of growth, so we see that submission growth rate as a positive signal. We sell a wide array of products, and the rates in those products don't move in lockstep, but if we boil it down to one number, we see real rates being up around 6%. The property market is still boosting the overall number. The rate changes for property would be well higher than average. The rate changes for the casualty divisions vary but overall would be about flat. It's important to stress that rate adequacy and rate change are two different things. As our results demonstrate, our rates are more than adequate. We are continually reviewing our rates and adjusting them based on a number of considerations, such as our target return on equity, the market opportunity, and shifts in the competition. In any event, we feel the business we are putting on the books today is the most adequately priced business we've seen in our history. Inflation has moderated somewhat, which has good and bad side effects. Good, in that lower inflation makes it easier to achieve our goal of conservative reserves that are more likely to develop favorably than adversely. But bad, in that it reduces the tailwinds we get from higher underlying exposures and higher audit premiums. We feel good about the market conditions through the end of the year and into 2024. After that, we expect at some point the market will revert more to normal. However, we believe our unique model will continue to drive superior returns in any market, hard, soft, or in between. Overall, a good quarter, and we are happy with the results. With that, I'll hand it back to Mike. Thanks, Brian. Operator, we're now ready for any questions in the queue. At this time, I would like to remind everyone, in order to ask a question, press star, followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Your first question comes from the line of Bill Carcache with Wolfe Research. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning. I wanted to follow up on the decline in your loss ratio. Do you see room for favorable development tailwinds relating to that 2021, 2022 accident years to persist? Just wondering how much benefit is left if those lower loss emergence trends continue? Yeah, Bill, good morning, this is Mike. I think the big shift in loss ratio from this quarter to the third quarter of last year was the absence of a major catastrophe. I think in general, we booked slightly higher loss ratio if you look at it on an ex-cat basis. And I think that's just a little bit of prospective additional conservatism. You know, especially thinking about inflation and the economy and its unpredictability. But we are very confident in terms of future redundancy that should come out over the years ahead as we incrementally, you know, adjust losses on these accident years. Understood. That's helpful. Thank you. Separately, can you give us a little bit more color on your view of pricing adequacy in the industry versus the loss cost trends that we're seeing? I think you previously suggested that the combination of inflationary pressures and, you know, the historical underpricing in standard lines could potentially extend the hard market as, you know, some carriers seek to course correct their pricing. Just, you know, your updated thoughts around those dynamics would be helpful. Yeah. I think we've talked in the past about there's a lot of conversation, especially among reinsurers, that tend to see a broad array of ceding company business, that there's a reserve adequacy issue for the industry on the casualty side, right? So we're just kind of repeating commentary we get from others. We're very confident in our own reserve position. And in terms of pricing adequacy across the industry, I would just note that it's a very large industry. There are a lot of players in it. We see some competitors that are very disciplined and smart about how they manage their businesses, and we see a lot that are quite reckless. Yeah, I would echo those comments. I would say, I don't think we've seen all the pain there is for the industry. And it would shock me if there weren't a few more competitors that were gonna run into some sort of difficulty with their reserves at some point. But like Mike said, we feel great about ours. That, that's helpful. Thank you. If I could squeeze in one last one. There's been some chatter surrounding unfavorable experiences that some carriers have had recently with under-delegated underwriting authority. Without citing anything specific, can you speak to what you're seeing in the marketplace and whether you expect any kind of changes in the proliferation of MGAs based on some of what we're seeing? Yeah. I would just say, I think, I think our investors understand that we're a big contrarians on that topic. We think underwriting should be a core competency of an insurance company, and so we're not believers in outsourcing that to external parties. As we've said in the past, there are some delegated arrangements that have been around for decades, that are well managed and quite profitable. But there's been an unusual explosion, if you will, in the number of delegated authorities, the number of fronting companies that have been created the last five or seven years. Invariably, some of that new capacity is probably not well managed and you know, there could be issues with profitability on that. I mean, we see a lot of bad behavior in the marketplace. I would just say anecdotally on a regular basis. That's very helpful. Thank you for taking my questions. Thanks, Bill. Your next question is from the line of Mark Hughes with Truist Securities. Your line is open. Yeah, thank you very much. Brian Haney, you had mentioned that one impact of lower inflation is the less exposure growth. Do you think that had any impact in the quarter? What's the magnitude of that effect? A little bit, but the reason we kind of focus on the property ceding and quota component was that was the big driver. But yeah, it had a little effect. The ceded premium ratio, 22% this quarter, is that a good number on a go-forward basis? Mark, I say, I think it's as good as any. You know, it is - it varies a little bit depending on mix of business. You know, we cede off 50% of our commercial property business. So as that business grows, you'll see, you know, the ceding ratio go up. If that, you know, scales back relative to other lines, then it could go the other way. But I think what you're seeing right now is as good a guess as I can give you. Then the reserve development in the quarter, still healthy, down a little bit from last year. Mike, you mentioned reserve development in 2016 through 2018. I don't know whether that was a more timely comment or whether you were just referring generally to older accident years that have, you know, have been more problematic, I think, across the whole space. Are those two connected, the lower reserve development, 2016 through 2018? Well, we're. You know, our 2016-2018 years have all developed favorably on an inception-to-date basis. But we've made the comment in the past that inflation has impacted the level of conservatism on the longer tail lines. I mean, the, you know, those, those years are getting to be a little bit older, so a lot of the claims have already been closed out. You know, but, you know, inflation does have an impact. And so I think it reinforces the wisdom of trying to take a cautious or conservative position upfront because it allows for things like inflation to happen. It was unanticipated, and yet, hey, those, those years have still developed favorably for, for Kinsale. So, you know, the fact that there's a little bit less favorable development, you know, that's the comment I made on an earlier question, is it was just a little bit of prospective, additional conservatism that just offsets the, the environment we're in, right? There's, there's a lot more uncertainty today around inflation and where it may be in the next year or two. As Brian Haney mentioned, it's definitely come down considerably from a year ago, but there's all sorts of economic commentary out there that maybe it, could, could either come down further or could, could tick back up. Nobody really knows definitively. So, as we always do, we take a conservative position, and then we're well prepared for whatever comes down the road. I think the net takeaway for our investors should be, they should have a lot of confidence in the consolidated balance sheet. And then, finally, any way to characterize the trend in the casualty book? You said the property certainly influenced the trajectory from 2Q growth to 3Q growth. How, how would you say the casualty book progressed across Q2 - 3Q? It's been up in the 20% range all year. You know, it bounces around quarter to quarter, but it's... You know, as Brian Haney mentioned, we've got some divisions like products liability and management liability that are kind of flat. We've got other divisions that are growing at a, you know, really phenomenal rate. But overall, it's kind of in that 20%, mid-20% range through nine months. Thank you. Your next question is from the line of Casey Alexander with Compass Point. Your line is open. Hi, good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. My first question is, in your discussion of, you know, the reversion of the long-term growth rate to 10%-20% range, how much do interest rates factor into that, you know, kind of general forecast? And by that, I mean that historically, in the insurance business, when rates sort of go to a higher for longer base, you find folks who are willing to underwrite at higher loss ratios in order to get premiums on the books that they can invest at higher interest rates. So does that have any impact on your forecast? Yeah, Casey, this is Mike Kehoe. Kehoe. I would say it's not really a forecast. It's really more just a general observation that in a large, mature industry like property casualty insurance, 40% growth is unusual, okay? So it's, you know, eventually there will be a mean reversion where we grow at a more modest clip. We're big believers in our business model. We, we operate a very disciplined underwriting operation. We're targeting the small account E&S market, which historically has grown faster than the broader P&C industry. We provide the best customer service in the industry in terms of quote ratios and response times to our brokers. We've got the most efficient business model of anybody we compete with. Our expense ratio is quite a bit lower than the competition. So, you know, for all these reasons, we're very bullish on growth. It's just, you know, I think we're up 46% year to date. It's like that, that will give way, you know, to something more modest. I do think it's a, it's a good point. Interest rates, you know, are a big driver of our business in terms of investment returns and, you know, eventually that will, you know, will have maybe more impact in the market. Keep in mind, though, it takes a while for those higher rates to, to kind of leg into portfolios. You know, we've seen our interest rate go up from, like, 2.5% to... What was the return? 3.9%. 3.9% this quarter, but, you know, it does take a couple of years for that to have its full impact. Okay, great. My second question is actually related to the portfolio, because you've actually, during the course of this year, while rates have gone up, you've pulled the duration in. Is there a point in time where you know, you extend that duration in order to capture the rise in interest rates for a longer period of time, considering the fact that, that it's usually likely at some point in time that the yield curve normalizes? Yeah. Yes, is the short answer. You know, right now, the yield curve is still inverted slightly, not as much as it was a couple of months ago. Where it goes from here, obviously, is uncertain with, you know, fiscal policy a little bit out of control at the government level, you know, all sorts of geopolitical uncertainty, you know, where oil prices go, is there a recession in the immediate future? So we're comfortable focusing on that two-year duration with new money at the moment, but absolutely, at some point, we'll probably extend that back. We were about 4.5-year duration prior to, you know, making the shift about 1.5 or two years ago. ... Okay, thank you for that. And lastly, when, when you say it changes in flow in Southeast property accounts, can you give a little more granularity on, on what that actually means? So it, yeah. So, this is Brian Haney. If, if your major exposure is to, let's say, Southeast hurricane, it's problematic for you to try to buy your cover with a, an effective date during wind season, because if a storm forms and there's a risk that it will hit you, the insurers won't either quote it or will quote it excluding that event. And just so you, you find yourself you would find yourself exposed to a possible, uncovered loss. So what the, the big account or the accounts tend to do in those areas is I buy it in the second quarter, which is, you know, why we saw a lot of growth, or why that's a big, property, quarter for us, and not in the third quarter. You would then therefore expect that to pick up in the fourth quarter post the cat season? Yeah, I would say the third quarter is inarguably the lowest. I don't know off the top of my head which of the other three quarters is the biggest. I get the sense that the first and second quarters are the biggest. Yeah. Okay, great. Thank you for taking my questions. I really appreciate it. Thanks, Casey. Your next question comes from the line of Andrew Andersen with Jefferies. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. Recognizing that industry stamping office data isn't perfect but was surprised to hear submission growth rate increase quarter-over-quarter. Has the company's product offerings suite increased, and these are newer lines, or is the appetite and willingness to compete on price changing in the same lines? It—we do expand our product line, but that's not what's driving it. The submission growth has just been pretty steady all year, and it's been very gradually accelerating. I'm not sure why we would be at variance with what the stamping offices are seeing, but it—that's pretty stable. Okay. And maybe if we could just get a bit more color on the type of property that is, has been being underwritten this year, just given industry cat losses year to date are pretty high, but for Kinsale, it's been, you know, half a percentage point. And maybe with that, is there a cat load target or AAL we should be thinking about? Andrew, this is Mike Kehoe. We don't have a cat load to offer. You know, you could just look back over the years and come up with an average, I guess. But our property book is, I think, a nice mix of fire-driven business, tough E&S occupancies, manufacturers, recyclers, et cetera, where fire is the predominant peril that you're underwriting for. And then, you know, southeast wind we write a fair amount of. A lot of our commercial property is written on an excess basis, so we don't get a steady flow of attritional losses. It tends to require a large event in order to trigger coverage. You know, we had a handful of policies in Hawaii that were exposed to the wildfire there, but I don't think any of them got to our attachment point, so we didn't have any claims come out of that. Idalia, which hit kind of a rural section of Florida, again, we had a handful of claims there, but nothing material. You know, I think our strategy, if you look back over the years, like Hurricane Ian, that was a powerful storm in a very populated area where we wrote a lot of business, and yet I think our loss net of reinsurance and tax was somewhere in the low to mid-20s, and we still had a mid-80s combined ratio in the third quarter of 2022. We're-- we like our property strategy. We think it's you know, we're definitely leaning into that area because with the margins are phenomenal. That market's still in a bit of a crisis, but we underwrite it in a careful manner. We buy a lot of reinsurance to spread the risk, and we think that's giving us the right outcome. Great. Thank you. Your next question is from the line of Scott Heleniak with RBC Capital Markets. Your line is open. Yeah, good morning. The Accident Year loss ratio for the third quarter was lower than the first half, and that was true last year. And I'm just wondering if there's anything behind that, anything seasonal or anything to kind of call out behind that? I think most years it's developed down slightly as we go through the Accident Year. I think it's just starting a little bit more conservative, and then, you know, as the year unfolds. Mm-hmm. We have a little bit more visibility into the performance of the book. Okay. Nothing, nothing specific then. Okay. And then you mentioned the E&S market conditions favorable, and you have a lot of quote activity, but I'm just wondering if you can touch a little bit on just any update on competition. I know you mentioned a little bit about MGAs, and you've mentioned that before, but are you seeing any newer players maybe you haven't seen a year ago? Or is it just kind of steady and not that much different this year than, you know, it had been, you know, a year ago? I'd say it's pretty steady. I mean, we do see people come and go, but it's fairly similar to how it's been all year. There's no major significant, Either, new competitors we're seeing, you know, making a huge grab for market share. But it's good to keep in mind too, there are hundreds and hundreds of MGAs with delegated underwriting. You know, they come and go on a regular basis, in addition to all the risk-bearing entities we compete with. So, I mean, there are. Yeah. There are a lot of, you know, individual entities competing in the market. Yep. Okay. Yeah, then the, yeah, just my final question to you is, I, I was just curious on, Aspera and your personal lines business. I guess we haven't heard about it in a while. Just, just an update on, what kind of growth that business is seeing and, and your appetite to expand that, and kind of where the profitability has been. Yeah. The last quarters. In reverse order, I would say the profitability this year has been quite positive. As you recall, we had a loss that was larger than expected in Hurricane Ian last year, and so we've been repositioning and basically de-risking certain areas to make sure that when the wind does blow, the size of our loss is consistent with our expectations. So we're kind of taking a step back. We're also working on some technological changes to that business to allow for a direct bill payment plans for the customers, and probably in the next several quarters, we would expect to pivot from reducing the premium volume to increasing it, getting a better geographic spread, et cetera. We're committed to the personal line space, the homeowner space. We're just kind of revamping that strategy as we speak. Okay. That makes sense. Thanks. Okay. Again, if you would like to ask a question, press star, followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of Pablo Singzon with JP Morgan. Your line is open. Hi, good morning. First question is, I was wondering if you could talk through conditions in various segments of the E&S casualty market. You know, so D&O has been singled out by many as a competitive product today, but I was wondering if you could talk through your own lines and, you know, maybe outside of Kinsale, like, major pockets in E&S casualty, where things are more or less competitive. Well, more competitive in management liability, products liability, you know, I think in construction tends to be fairly competitive. That's a long tail line where we've raised rates repeatedly in the last couple of years. I think given our pricing strategy, we're probably less competitive maybe. We're still growing that area, I think a nice clip, but it's not dramatic. You touched on a number of areas where there's, you know, very strong growth. Yeah, you know, our excess casualty is doing well. Our entertainment, which is a relatively newer division, is doing well. Commercial auto is a new, a newer division, doing well, so. Okay, thanks. And then the second question was on the loss ratio, right? So consolidated loss ratio has been running close to 60%. I think most of that reflects your picks on casualty lines, right? Which in hindsight have been conservative. But as you grow in property, I was hoping to get perspective on, you know, how that loss ratio might change, right? Just given that property coverage tends to have lower loss ratios, and I think you mentioned that you guys write excess, which implies even lower loss ratio. So I'm just trying to understand, you know, how the mix might change, you know, let's say, the run rate 60 that you've always had. Yeah, it's hard, Pablo, this is Mike. It's hard to give you a number. You know, we reserve all of our lines of business conservatively at the start. You know, long tail lines that IBNR position drifts down slowly over the years ahead as the claims get reported and resolved and negotiated, et cetera. Properties are shorter tail line of business, so the IBNR we put up there, you know, tends to come down fairly quickly. But I don't think we can give you a specific number. I mean, we're always adjusting IBNR numbers based on all sorts of things, including our experience, inflation, rate changes in the marketplace, et cetera. I don't know. Okay. The next question I had was just on development, right? I think reserve development. I think it's pretty clear at this point that you guys have good underwriting margins embedded in, you know, accident years, 2020 and forward, right? Really good margins. If I look at the 2020 accident year for casualty occurrence, for example, I think from your, from the 2022 10-K, incurred losses are running at 15% below your initial picks. I guess that's why I'm trying to sort of size the benefit that's still embedded in your balance sheet, right? Just a couple of questions. Like, one, how long would it take for your casualty books to fully season, right? 2020 is, like, three years in. Not entirely there, but you know, maybe getting closer to the end. And then would you say qualitatively that the pricing spread on business you put in 2021 and 2022 and maybe even this year, is better than what, what you put in 2020? ... Yeah, I think, I think the current year is probably the best ever, but the last several years have been really attractive levels of pricing for Kinsale as a risk-bearing entity. Unequivocally, we're being well paid for the risk we take. In terms of the, you know, when, when the-- I, I forget how you characterized it, the book, you know, the reserves are seasoned or whatever. Yep. You know, say that again, Pablo? No, I was just confirming what you said, Mike. Yep, just when these books will fully season, right? It's not three years, maybe closer to five or six, but I just wanted to get an answer from you. I would just remind you, we write a lot of different lines of business: short, medium, and long tail. And so the property is where you know, pretty definitively within, you know, a year or two or three, you know, the excess casualty, some of the construction business related to construction defect claims can drag on for quite some time, which is great from an investment standpoint. We get to invest those reserves at higher interest rates, but, you know, you are more exposed to things like inflation. I don't know. Brian's a former actuary in his career, so- I don't know, I guess I would say, you know, at the outside, probably by three or four years, I would think for the average of the book, we have a pretty good idea. And then for even the longest tail, I think by the five years, six or seven, we have a very good idea but- When you get four or five years out, most of the. Yeah. Claims have been closed, right? Yeah. So you're with a dwindling number of claims, but they happen to be the more. Yeah. So it's. Yep, that's helpful, and this is my last question. It'll be the simplest one, just the reinsurance. So, you know, with updated program, you were getting less premiums, but I was wondering if there is a benefit on the ceding commissions that you earn from the higher quota shares. Thank you. Well, the benefit is we get a 27.5% ceding commission on our property quota share, on the business we cede away. So if you look at that, it's like, hey, we don't really take much in the way of any underwriting risk on the premium we cede away, and there's a de minimis amount of capital required for that business. And yet we get a 27.5% ceding commission. We tend to pay direct commissions to our brokers on 14% or 15%. So the net, it's a nice addition to our bottom line without a lot of risk. On the casualty, it's a little bit different. We cede away, it's a variable quota share, so it depends on the limits. I think in general, it's about 60% of the excess casualty. The higher limit casualty business, we cede away about 60% of that. We get a commission of 35%. You know, we tend to pay 14% or 15% commissions to our brokers, so we net about, you know, 19% or 20% pre-tax on the business we cede away. Again, with minimal underwriting risk and minimal capital being required. So it's just a nice complement to our business from a profitability standpoint. It allows us to write higher limits than maybe we otherwise wouldn't want to retain net. Those are some of the ways we think about it. But there's no, there's no profit contingency embedded in that business. It's just a straightforward split of the economics that's negotiated upfront. Yep. That's helpful. Thanks for your answers, guys. Your next question comes from the line of Mike Zaremski with BMO. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. I guess a follow-up on, on, some of, along the lines of Pablo's initial questions on, on reserving, and I'll admit that I got into the queue late, so give me a short answer if you guys already walked through this. But, I know if we look at reserve release levels year to date, obviously extremely healthy, but down, you know, fairly materially year over year. Not just a Kinsale, you know, issue, it's a, it's a, you know, industry-wide phenomenon from what we can see. Curious if you have any just thoughts on, you know, whether it's due to kind of just changing business mix simply, or, you know, you're seeing slight changes to kind of loss trend that, you know, are kind of just, you know, meaning that there's going to be a little bit less good guy, or there has been a little less reserve releases. Any color would be great. Yeah, Mike, this is Mike. I would say, and that this is what we said earlier in the call, was the drop in redundancy was... I would look at it as a prospective additional amount of conservatism. We're reporting phenomenal results in terms of profitability, but we're also mindful that we're in an uncertain era in terms of inflation and where it might be going in the years ahead. And again, our book is a mix of short, medium, and long tail business. The longer tail business can be more exposed to inflation. And so we're, you know, we're doing what we always do, which is we have a very quantitative process with how we set reserves.... But there's also some judgment that's brought to bear, and we're always looking to set aside more dollars today than we think we're going to need to resolve claims over the years ahead, so that we're, you know, never going back to the well just to take a big reserve charge. We want to continue to have that redundancy drift out year after year. And I think it's one of the things that makes this a phenomenal business and a great way to create wealth, you know, year after year, by having conservative reserves up front that develop favorably over time. So that's all it is. We're just setting aside a little bit more incrementally, but still reporting good results in the process. Okay, that's helpful. And lastly, you know, you just detailed, kind of this arbitrage that you have on your ceding, especially some of your casualty book, in terms of kind of what your expense ratio is versus the, the commissions you get. But, just a couple of reinsurers have just very recently talked about, you know, the dynamics in the reinsurance space, allowing them to potentially, you know, continue to change the ceding commission ratio back into-- more into their favor. Just curious, I'm assuming if your reinsurers are making good money. So, but do you—is that a dynamic that, you know, that we should be thinking about over the coming year that could just, you know, incrementally impact Kinsale if the reinsurers are able to kind of move in that direction? I would say that would be highly unlikely for Kinsale, mostly because of the reason you touched on, which is our book of business has been very profitable for us, certainly, but for our reinsurers as well. And so we think that Kinsale is a very attractive account for the reinsurance market. You know, we're a ceding company that's always put a high value on continuity in that reinsurance program. So a lot of the carriers that share with us the risk, they've been on our account since we opened the business back in March 2010. And so we've got, I think, very positive relationships with our reinsurers. I think in general, we've produced very attractive business for them over the years, and we think it'll be a steady process going forward. It's not to say that, you know, rates and prices can't fluctuate a little bit year by year, but in general, it should be relatively steady. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call back over to Mr. Michael Kehoe. Okay. Well, I just want to thank everybody for participating this morning, and we look forward to sharing some more good news after the fourth quarter in a couple of months. Have a great day.