Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Krystal Biotech fourth quarter and full year 2023 earnings conference call. At this time, all participants are on a listen-only mode. After the speakers' presentations, there will be a question-and-answer session. As a reminder, today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your host, Meg Dodge, Head of Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Please begin. Good morning, and thank you all for joining today's call. Earlier today, we released our financial results for the fourth quarter and full year of 2023. The press release is available on our website at www.krystalbio.com. Our earnings 8-K was filed earlier today, and additionally, we filed our 10-K with the SEC. Joining me will be Krish Krishnan, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Suma Krishnan, President of Research and Development; and Kathryn Romano, Chief Accounting Officer. I'd like to note, during this webcast, we will be making a number of forward-looking statements about our future business plans, strategies, financial performances and projections, product candidate development plans, including statements about VYJUVEK. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, any of which are beyond Krystal's control. Actual results could materially differ from these forward-looking statements, as any such risks can materially and adversely affect the business, results of operations, and trading price of Krystal's common stock. For a detailed description of applicable risks and uncertainties, we encourage you to review our SEC filings. The company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update its forward-looking statements, including any financial projections provided today based on subsequent events or circumstances. With that, let me now turn the call over to Krish. Meg, thank you. Good morning, and thanks for joining the Krystal's earnings call. 2023 was a spectacular year for Krystal and an inflection point for our company. With the approval and launch of VYJUVEK for the treatment of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, or DEB, we've now brought to market the first and only treatment that addresses the genetic cause of this debilitating disease. It has been immensely rewarding to hear from patients, families, and the entire DEB community on the positive impact VYJUVEK has had on their lives. It's also exciting to have secured this first approval for an entirely new treatment paradigm. We believe that a redosable topical off-the-shelf gene therapy that can be dosed at home by HCP holds significant potential not only for DEB patients but for many others suffering from other rare and serious diseases. We've only just begun tapping into the power of the HSV-1 based gene therapy platform. As I will share in a moment, our U.S. launch of VYJUVEK is in a great place, tracking closely to some of the most successful rare disease launches from recent years, with over $50 million in net product revenue from VYJUVEK in the last six months since approval. We've seen rapid uptake across the U.S., patient compliance is high, access is almost behind us, and all these are starting to reflect in our net revenue. We're also making significant progress globally and look forward to growing the number of patients benefiting from VYJUVEK in the days, months, and years to come. Our success in 2023 allowed us to deliver another year of significant value creation for our shareholders and, perhaps more importantly, set us down a path for continued growth in the years to come. Our vision for Krystal has always been to build a fully integrated, commercially established biotechnology company, developing and commercializing a portfolio of high-value genetic medicines and generating long-term shareholder returns. Thanks to a breakthrough year in 2023 and growing VYJUVEK revenue, we are positioned better than ever to deliver on that vision. We expect to have at least five clinical trials this year. We have alignment with the FDA on a development path for VYJUVEK formulated as eye drops to help treat eye lesions in DEB patients and could potentially start another clinical trial in the second half of 2024. With strong financial resources and FDA-approved redosable gene therapy platform and two commercial-scale GMP manufacturing facilities, we're uniquely positioned to develop and bring to market highly differentiated gene therapies for many rare and serious diseases. We look forward to making continued progress in 2024. As you have no doubt seen by now, our commercial launch is proceeding exceptionally well. We reported net VYJUVEK revenue of $42.1 million for the fourth quarter and $50.1 million for 2023. Gross margins were 93% for the quarter, in line with our previous guidance of margins north of 90% at launch and expected to improve to over 95% after a few years. Gross-to-net adjustments in the fourth quarter were 14%. Our long-term guidance on GTN is unchanged, and we expect it will settle into the mid- to high-teens range, reflecting a roughly even split of DEB patients on commercial and government plans. With respect to future revenue, I'd like to highlight that earlier this year, a permanent J-code was assigned to VYJUVEK. The J-code is an important milestone for finalizing coverage by Medicaid, as it is required for many mandatory Medicaid states. Although this is a long-term tailwind and sets us up for sustained broad access in the U.S., I will note that the revenue in the month of January was temporarily impacted, as commercial and Medicaid coverage plans, including those that were previously covering VYJUVEK under a temporary J-code, were updated to the now-issued permanent J-code. You can also expect to see an impact this year, as we accrue for patients on contracted commercial plans, potentially hitting the price cap of $900,000 gross per patient per calendar year in 2024. Before sharing details on the U.S. launch, I'd like to highlight a revision to our outlook on the total market opportunity that exists for VYJUVEK. Now that we have the benefit of six months' launch data in the U.S. and a clear line of sight on registrations and patient numbers in Europe and Japan, and alignment with the FDA on the development plan to get VYJUVEK formulated as eye drops to treat eye lesions in DEB patients, we're confident in the total global market opportunity for VYJUVEK to get over $1 billion. Based on the trajectory of our launch and the feedback we're receiving from the field, our conviction in the total U.S. market opportunity for VYJUVEK is only growing. We have spoken before about a total DEB population of 3,000 in the U.S., of which 1,200 are identified. That 1,200 figure, initially based on independent third-party claims, datasets from multiple sources, has been further strengthened by our latest data from the field, which includes interactions with over 1,500 unique HCPs, as well as real-time claims alerts that they use to optimize field developments. We expect to close the gap between 1,200 and 3,000 in the years to come. We're already finding new patients, patients not part of the identified pool, in the first few quarters of launch, and we expect this to continue, if not accelerate, as we increase our focus on patient finding in later quarters. Once we reach a meaningful threshold of 1,500 patients, we'll update our identified patient population number. Also, Krishtine Wilson has now joined Krystal as the Head of U.S. Sales and Marketing, reporting to me. Krishtine brings decades of commercial experience to Krystal, including a strong record of leading U.S. rare disease sales teams at Travere, Reata, and Shire. Most importantly, Krishtine has direct experience finding and activating rare disease patients in the community and will play a critical role for us as we continue to penetrate in and grow our identified patient pool in the months and years to come. Outside of the United States, we benefit from patient registries, which give us a high degree of confidence in the global market opportunity. In France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the U.S. alone, we believe there are over 2,200 DEB patients that could benefit from VYJUVEK and there are hundreds more in Japan. We look forward to seeing continued growth in 2024, not only in the U.S. but also globally, as we make progress towards EU and Japanese approvals. As Suma will share, we're on track to launch in both regions in 2025. Now I'd like to share a few highlights on the US launch. With respect to patient start forms, we're pleased to report that we have now received start forms representing 35% of the initial 1,200 identified patient pool. We're happy to see that we're both expanding and deepening the prescriber base as we progress in our launch. We now have over 195 unique prescribers of VYJUVEK, up from the 136 unique prescribers we reported in the third quarter. We're encouraged to see the broadening of VYJUVEK prescriber base as awareness of our product grows through both our direct promotion efforts and organically through patient groups and the medical community. We're also seeing increasing depth of prescribing, as the number of physicians that had written two or more prescriptions for DEB patients increased from 37 in the third quarter to 60 as of mid-February. We believe this increase is a reflection of the growing familiarity among prescribers with VYJUVEK, and we expect this positive trend to continue as patient outcomes on VYJUVEK become more widely known. With respect to the split of PSFs between centers of excellence in the community, trends are in line with what we saw earlier in the third quarter. 47% of patient start forms received as of mid-February were from centers of excellence, and the balance of the scripts were written by community physicians. We continue to see a steady flow of start forms from centers of excellence at a cadence correlated to EB clinic days. The split between DDEB and RDEB subforms is also largely in line with what we saw in the third quarter, with a slight uptick in the proportion of prescriptions received from DDEB patients. Importantly, we are starting to see significant conversion of patients converted to paid drug, with 228 patient reimbursement approvals secured to date. Most approvals are for six months or more, so a few have been up for reauthorization so far, but all have been either approved or still in process. In line with our high conversion rates, access is in a great place. We have received positive coverage policies or decisions for 97% of lives covered by commercial plans and 88% of lives covered by Medicaid. With the permanent J-code now assigned, the trajectory for access and reimbursement approvals is only looking better. At-home administration demand continues to be high, now two full quarters into launch, with 98% of the drug starts occurring in a home setting. Accordingly, we also continue to see strong patient compliance to once-weekly treatment while on drug, holding at 96% in the fourth quarter. We believe that compliance is both a reflection of the significant clinical benefits that can be realized with the VYJUVEK therapy, as well as our commitment to the patient experience and ensuring a smooth process to getting on drug. At this point in our launch, I think it's also worthwhile to reiterate and update on some of the key dynamics that shape the trajectory of the VYJUVEK update. Although there is a temptation to think that for a severe rare disease such as DEB, all patients would get prescriptions the day after approval, there are practical considerations that need to be understood. First, it's important to recall that COE visits occur at a steady pace around EB clinics, with only a subset of their EB patients seen at each visit due to the time spent on each patient and the multi-specialty care they receive in the COE setting. In addition, we are also seeing some KOLs, less familiar with VYJUVEK, taking a stepwise approach, starting with the more severe RDEB patients and stage-gating, particularly in the early stages of access where reimbursement was still being set up. Second, it's important to understand that DEB patients are not all clustered around centers of excellence. Prior to 2023, only palliative treatment options were available, whether offered by a COE or a community physician. As a result, there was often little reason for a patient to visit, let alone return to a COE, unless it was conveniently located. Certainly, there are some patients that are actively managed at COEs, but an equal number or more exist in the community, and many patients have relied on community physicians for many years prior to 2023. This also has implications for the launch. It means that we have to make local doctors aware of VYJUVEK, educated on DEB, gene therapy, and sometimes both. Recall as well that prior to VYJUVEK approval, care of EB wounds did not require genetic confirmation, so even establishing this practice is an evolution in patient management. This is all addressable through physician education programs, but it does take a certain amount of time and contributes to a more gradual ramp in patient starts. Finally, there are logistical aspects of integrating at-home dosing of VYJUVEK into existing wound care and bandaging routines. As the first and only FDA-approved redosable gene therapy, providing access to and coordinating weekly home treatment of VYJUVEK is not as simple as dispensing pills at a local pharmacy for patient pickup, or even one-and-done gene therapies administered at a large specialty center. Once the initial scheduling and setup is complete, which again takes a certain amount of time, what we're seeing is strong adherence, given that VYJUVEK is designed to be integrated into existing wound care routines and demonstrated efficacy. Together, these real-world dynamics influence the shape of our launch curve, which we expect to be characterized by a steady stream of prescriptions and patient conversions to drug. Recall that our own estimates for the United States are informed by multiple third-party estimates and our own real-time and boots-on-the-ground insights, and further supported by the prevalence in Europe, where robust patient registries and genetic testing indicate their prevalence rates well in excess of our U.S.-identified patient pool. So trying to correlate the shape of the launch curve to prevalence is simply erroneous. Our conviction in the total opportunity and our ability to capture it have only been strengthened after these first few quarters of launch. Before closing on the U.S. launch, I'd like to underscore the thanks to the efforts of our team and our focus on the patient experience with changing the treatment paradigm for DEB patients. Years ago, we set out to build the necessary infrastructure to support a strong commercial launch, including our patient support program, Krystal Connect, our no-cost genetic testing program, Decode DEB, and a network of local pharmacies to prepare and deliver VYJUVEK to a patient's home, along with a trained nurse to apply the treatment each week. As I just shared, this at-home administration infrastructure has been in high demand since launch, supporting strong compliance to the therapy. As I also reported, we're broadening and deepening the prescriber base. All KOLs within centers of excellence across the U.S. have now prescribed VYJUVEK. Outside of the centers of excellence, our field team has had tremendous success educating regional, adult, and pediatric dermatologists and community physicians, as evidenced by the continued influx of community prescriptions. Sales cycles tend to be a bit longer in the community, but for 2024, with more evidence of a dispersed patient community, we expect to continue to generate demand from large EB centers, regional derm specialists, and community physicians. Finally, our marketing team has invested and will begin deploying several social media campaigns on different channels to generate awareness to patients and families directly who we know, similar to other rare diseases, having varying levels of engagement with the healthcare system as they've learned to self-manage their DEB wounds but deserve to learn about VYJUVEK and the benefit it can provide to them. Combined with our partnership with advocacy groups, we're committed to reaching all patients and families to share the powerful wound healing that VYJUVEK can provide them. Altogether, these successes point to a strong long-term growth strategy for VYJUVEK in the U.S. In the interim, it's important to highlight that by any metric, the launch of VYJUVEK has been among the top tier of rare disease launches in recent years. Despite all the nuances that I outlined, in only two full quarters since approval, we recorded $50.7 million in revenue. And now, as of mid-February, we've secured reimbursement approvals for 228 patients and have positive coverage policies in place for over 93% of commercial and Medicaid patients. We are excited about our success to date and more excited so by the years to come as we work to change the treatment paradigm for every patient with DEB. Finally, before I turn the call over to Suma, I'd like to touch on the power of our platform and our milestone-rich clinical pipeline. The Krystal story is more than just VYJUVEK. HSV-1 is unlike any other vector system currently in development, with a capacity for large genetic cargo, broad tissue tropism, redosability, and no integration risk. HSV-1 is also amenable to formulation to target multiple tissues such as the skin, the lung, and the eye, providing us with a large number of opportunities to develop first and best-in-class genetic medicines for rare and serious diseases. Our team is hard at work leveraging these unique platform attributes and advancing our programs to and through the clinic. These include a new eye drop formulation of B-VEC to treat ocular complications of DEB, which has already been evaluated in single patient under compassionate use. Two clinical stage lung programs targeting cystic fibrosis and alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency. An emerging oncology program that leverages our experience in skin and lung drug delivery, as well as clinical stage candidates for rare skin disease and aesthetic skin conditions. With four active clinical programs and more to come later this year, we look forward to the data readouts, which will validate the breadth of our HSV-1-based gene delivery platform. I shall now turn the call over to Suma to provide a clinical and a regulatory update and provide more color on the clinical programs. Thank you, Krish. 2023 was a milestone year for Krystal and our development team securing the first-ever FDA approval for a redosable gene therapy. It has been immensely gratifying to see a growing number of U.S. patients benefit from VYJUVEK as our commercial launch progresses. However, our work is not yet done. Our goal has always been to enable global access for patients suffering from DEB. I'm happy today to share we are on track for commercial launches in both Europe and Japan by 2025. For Europe, we announced in October that we filed for a marketing authorization with the European Medicines Agency. Subsequently, in November, our filing was validated by the agency, putting us on track for a decision by the European authorities in the second half of 2024. In Japan, we recently announced in December that we had received orphan drug designation by Japan's Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency, a designation which confers specific benefit for orphan drug development, including priority review of applications, extended registration validity, and reduced development cost. With our open-label bridging study in Japanese patients fully enrolled, we are on track for a Japanese new drug application filing in 2024 and a decision by Japanese authorities in 2025. We are also making important progress on our broader clinical pipeline, where we have four programs in the clinic and more coming in the first half of this year. As said previously, we are committed to treating DEB comprehensively. Ocular complications are thought to affect over half of patients with recessive DEB, and to date, only supportive care and surgical interventions are available. Earlier this month, the New England Journal of Medicine published the clinical results for the first patient treated with topical B-VEC to the eye. The improvement seen in this patient was dramatic, including full healing of the corneal epithelium and improvement of visual acuity from hand motion to 20/25 by eight months. Given these outcomes, we started discussion with the FDA earlier this year regarding a potential development program to bring an ophthalmic B-VEC formulation to market. Earlier this month, we reached alignment with the FDA on a single-arm open-label study to enable approval of B-VEC eye drops for the treatment of lesions in the eye of DEB patients. We are now planning to initiate this study in the second half of 2024. On KB-407, our redosable inhaled gene therapy for the treatment of cystic fibrosis, we completed cohort one of the CORAL-1 study with no severe or serious adverse events and initiated dosing in cohort two. CORAL-1 is a phase one open-label dose escalation study in patients with cystic fibrosis. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate safety and tolerability of KB-407, but bronchoscopies are planned for cohort three to allow evaluation of airway epithelial cell transduction and expression of CFTR transcript and protein. Cohort three also includes minimum enrollment thresholds for patients that are not eligible for modulators, an important patient population for which no effective disease-modifying therapies exist. The pace of enrollment in CORAL-1 is improving as clinicians grow more familiar with inhaled KB-407. The potential for patients to roll over into multiple cohorts is also expected to help us progress more rapidly through cohort two and three. In addition, we continue to work closely with the Therapeutic Development Network of Cystic Fibrosis Foundation to provide us access to the broader site network, which would enable us to accelerate enrollment. On KB-408, our redosable inhaled therapy for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, we just recently dosed our first patient in our Serpentine-1 study. Serpentine-1 is a phase 1 open-label single-dose escalation study in adult patients with AATD to allow assessment of safety, tolerability, and alpha-1 antitrypsin levels and key pharmacodynamic biomarkers. With strong support from the alpha-1 research community, we are optimistic that this study will enroll quickly in 2024. We also made several advancements in our oncology program, KB-707, last quarter and earlier this year. Recall that KB-707 is a modified HSV-1 vector designed to deliver genes encoding both human IL-12 and IL-2 to the tumor microenvironment and promote systemic immune-mediated tumor clearance. We have two formulations of KB-707 in development: a liquid formulation for intratumoral injection and an inhaled formulation for lung delivery. In October, the first patient was dosed in phase 1 OPAL-1 study to evaluate intratumoral KB-707 monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumor malignancies. Additionally, an amendment to the existing KB-707 IND was cleared earlier this January, allowing us to evaluate inhaled KB-707 in a clinical trial to treat tumors in patients' lungs. We will initiate this study, which we'll be calling KYNITE-1, in the first half of 2024. It will be an open-label multi-center dose escalation and expansion study to evaluate inhaled KB-707 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies affecting the lungs. And finally, we are looking forward to sharing a data update on our lead aesthetic program, KB-301, later this year. KB-301 is being evaluated in the PEARL-1 multi-cohort phase 1 study. We previously announced data from cohorts 1 and 2, which demonstrated that KB-301 encoded with payload CAL3A1 was expressed locally after intradermal injection and that injections to the upper and lower cheek and above the knees were generally well tolerated and associated with clinically meaningful and durable improvements in subject satisfaction. We are now running cohort 3 and 4 of PEARL-1 in parallel to evaluate KB-301 for two potential target indications: improvement of lateral canthal lines at rest and improvement of dynamic wrinkles of the décolleté. Both were identified as potential indications based on initial data from cohort 1 and cohort 2 and the high demand for effective aesthetic options in these regions. We expect to announce data in the first half of 2024. We are also progressing on our broader pipeline in dermatology. We expect to commence the phase 2 cohort of this KB-105-02 JADE-1 trial for the treatment of TGM1-ARCI later this year, subject to alignment with the FDA on study endpoints. Additional preclinical candidates are also in development, and we expect to share updates in the quarters to come. Our HSV platform has potential to yield a large number of highly differentiated redosable gene therapies. We look forward to making continued progress in 2024 and sharing data updates on our clinical pipeline later this year. With that, I would like to turn the call to Kate. Thank you, Suma. We concluded 2023 with $358.3 million of cash on hand and $594.1 million of cash in investments, which positions us well for our future growth, the expansion of VYJUVEK outside of the U.S., and our pipeline development plans. In our second quarter since the launch, we recorded $42.1 million in net product revenues from VYJUVEK in the fourth quarter and $50.7 million for the year ended 2023. As VYJUVEK was approved by the FDA in May of 2023, there were no comparative period revenues. Cost of goods sold was $2.9 million for the quarter, or about 7% of net product revenues, and $3.1 million for the year, or about 6% of net product revenues. Cost of goods sold increased on a sequential quarter basis as a portion of the initial costs associated with the manufacturing of VYJUVEK were expensed as research and development costs earlier in the year prior to approval. Research and development expenses for the quarter were $11.4 million, inclusive of stock-based compensation of $2.4 million, compared to $10.7 million for the prior year's quarter, inclusive of $2.4 million of stock-based compensation. Research and development expenses for the year were $46.4 million, inclusive of stock-based compensation of $10.1 million, compared to $42.5 million in the prior year, inclusive of $7.9 million of stock-based compensation. Higher research and development expenses in 2023 were due to increases in payroll and facility-related costs, primarily driven by an increase in personnel to support our overall growth, especially as we ramp up our KB-707 program, partially offset by decreases in R&D manufacturing costs as, following our FDA approval, our costs related to the manufacturing of VYJUVEK are now recorded as part of our cost of inventory. Selling general and administrative expenses for the quarter were $24.8 million, inclusive of stock-based compensation of $7.5 million, compared to $24 million for the prior year's quarter, inclusive of stock-based compensation of $7.2 million. Selling general and administrative expenses for the year were $98.4 million, inclusive of stock-based compensation of $29.9 million, compared to $77.7 million in the prior year, inclusive of stock-based compensation of $25.3 million. Higher selling general and administrative expenses in 2023 were largely driven by an increase in personnel, increased selling expenses related to the launch of VYJUVEK, increased IT infrastructure and software costs, as well as increases in travel, sponsorship, and professional fees. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in commercial preparation expenses, a decrease in medical affairs costs, and a decrease in business development costs. Our net income for the quarter was $8.7 million, which represented $0.31 per basic share and $0.30 per diluted share. Net income for the year ended 2023 was $10.9 million, which represented $0.40 per basic share and $0.39 per diluted share, compared to a $140 million net loss in 2022, which equated to a loss of $5.49 per share, both basic and diluted. We would also like to provide some perspective on our forecast for operating costs in 2024, given the objectives we have for the year. We expect between $150 million-$175 million in combined non-GAAP R&D and SG&A costs this year. This projection excludes stock-based compensation. This expected increase over 2023 is driven primarily by increased SG&A costs associated with our continued U.S. launch and planned expansion for VYJUVEK outside of the U.S. From a research and development perspective, we expect a pickup in our clinical and regulatory costs associated with our oncology and respiratory programs, as well as for costs associated with initiating a clinical trial for the B-VEC formulation to treat lesions in the eye of DEB patients. With that being said, and given our projected revenue trajectory in 2024, in our current strong balance sheet, we are well capitalized and positioned for these growth drivers, and we look forward to reporting our progress over the next several quarters. Now I will turn the call back over to Krish. Before we open the call up to Q&A, I'd like to underscore our excitement for 2024 as we have successfully transitioned Krystal to a fully integrated commercial biotech with a deep clinical pipeline. With a great launch underway and growing revenue to contribute to our already strong balance sheet, we believe we are well positioned to create value for our shareholders and deliver our mission for patients now and in the future. Thanks for listening, and I'd like to now open the call for Q&A. Thank you. At this time, we will be conducting a question-and-answer session. If you have any questions or comments, please press star one on your phone at this time. We ask that while posing your question, you please pick up your handset if listening on speakerphone to provide optimum sound quality. Once again, that's star one if you wish to ask a question at this time. And please hold while we pull for questions. First question today is coming from Alec Stranahan from Bank of America. Alec, you're live on live. Hey, guys. Thanks for taking our questions and congrats on the strong close to 2023. Two questions from us. I guess, what has been roughly the average conversion time between new start forms and initiating therapy in 4Q? And where do you see this tracking over the next few quarters, or is this really not the metric we should be looking at anymore? And second, could you maybe walk us through the anticipated J-code impact to uptake, looking at the next couple of quarters, especially in the Medicare segment? Thanks. Thanks, Alec. Hey, on your first question, at the end of Q3, we were tracking at a 2-month pace between start forms to patient-on-drug. We were making progress, and presently, we're about 30 days from a start form to patient-on-drug. Our goal, at least by the second half of this year, is to shrink it down by a few weeks, maybe 2-3 weeks. A lot of it has to do with single-case agreements and with access getting behind us. We expect the trend to only decrease and get to a steady state of 2-3 weeks in the second half of this year. With respect to the J-code, the reason I mentioned that comment, look, J-code is a great tailwind for the company long term. I just was simply pointing out that in January, as our specialty pharmacy was transitioning people into the official J-code from a prior J-code, you should expect a few weeks of a revenue hit to the story in the interim. But outside of that, we don't particularly see the J-code having any impact going forward, especially impact in the positive direction, not having any kind of impact in the other direction. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is coming from Yigal Nochomovitz from Citi. Yigal, your line is live. Hi, Krishtine. Thank you so much for taking the question. Could you just help us clarify on the numbers? The 228 reimbursement approvals and the 35% of the 1,200, the 420, is the 228 a subset of the 420, or are they distinct populations? Just to clarify, please. No, no. I mean, let me answer it this way. The 1, the 35%, the 420, that's clearly the start forms that we've been mentioning in the past. The 228 talks about, out of the start forms we've gotten, the exact number of reimbursement we have gotten from we like that metric because it's a much closer indicator of net revenue in the long term. And so, yes, obviously, it is a subset of all the start forms we've gotten, sort of answer that very directly. But it's a different metric in the sense that it's a more important metric as revenue becomes a much more important part of the story going forward. Okay, thanks. And then you referenced that I think you said 60 of the 195 were prescribed to or more. I was just trying to do a little math on that. It suggests that for those higher prescribers, it's somewhere around 5 patients per prescriber. Is that the correct thinking, or is it a different? Thanks. I think, I mean, it's a difficult question to answer immediately, but I think you're right. I think you're right. All we were trying to show is that people who prescribed VYJUVEK to begin with are now getting more familiar with the drug and are repeat prescribing, and that's a good metric for us because it shows the confidence in the drug. It shows they are expanding to a broader base of patients. There were a couple of COEs, I've mentioned this before, who were positioning that, "Let me get my RDEB patients on drug before I get my dominant patients on drug and see how they're doing." All in all, the reason for that metric is to show increasing confidence of a prescriber towards continuing to prescribe VYJUVEK. Okay. And then just one quick one on the eye drop of certainly very interesting early data. Can you just discuss the strategy there longer term? Is that going to be provided as an adjunct to the topical for those that have the eye complications, or would it be an additionally priced drug separate from the cream? I think it's a bit too early to be very definitive on the matter, but our objective is to have a separately priced product like we do right now on that single patient. We ship that patient an extra bio. And so our thinking is to have a separate NDC number, a separate pricing, and send it along with the topical gel. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. The next question is coming from De-. Yeah, I just want to clarify, sorry, on the eye. As I said, we have pre-IND guidance from the agency. So this is going to be a new IND, and it's going to be a BLA, so a brand new label with a new NDC code, as Krish mentioned. Just want to clarify. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is coming from Debjit Chattopadhyay from Guggenheim. Debjit, your line is live. Hey, good morning, team. This is Robert on for Debjit. Can you provide any color on the number of dominant patients on therapy as of December 31st and February 24, 2024, and also the number of recessive patients on therapy as of December 31st? And then I have a follow-up on the ocular complications. No, I think for now, and I don't want to dig through to figure this split out, I think for now, as we mentioned in the call, 25% of the total start forms were the dominant type. We did not, just to be clear, see any big change in the trend of the dominant versus recessive at the moment. Okay. Thank you. And then on ocular, do you currently have 10 or more patients with complications identified who could quickly be enrolled? And how long is follow-up planned for the study? I can answer this question. Yes. In fact, we have a lot of patients, and I mean, the reason we are accelerating is because there is request for even off-label, so we want to avoid that. Yes, we do have enough patients who have a good natural history of their disease. As you can see, it's a single-arm, open-label study, so it should be pretty straightforward. Great. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is coming from Dae Gon Ha from Stifel. Dagon, your line is live. Great. Thanks for taking our questions, and let me have my congrats on the quarter as well. Krish, just going back to the roughly 136 start forms that you've reported as of February, I was just kind of curious if you could talk about the cadence of patients. I know it's kind of a combination of Q4 and a little bit of 2024, and you've added a lot of conviction around sort of the year-end, I mean, the opportunity this year. So if you could kind of comment on that cadence. And then going back to the more than $1 billion opportunity you were talking about, I guess a little early, but if you can maybe frame for us what exactly are you thinking because in prior, I guess, VYJUVEK approval, you've given some conservative estimates that you had to revise. What should we be thinking in terms of B-VEC ophthalmic solution there? Thanks so much. Great. Hey, on the cadence of patients, just to correct you, I think 35% of 1,200. I want to be clear, that's the number of start forms. I heard a number of 136 that I wasn't sure about. But that said, look, definitely, the holiday period were a bit slow, slow as in appointments getting pushed out by a week or two, EB clinics being rescheduled. And that was a singular cadence that we observed, which is why we kind of pushed out the start form reporting as of February. So that's the cadence on that. On the opportunity, look, there was some confusion when we first reported. When we first reported the market opportunity, all we had was an approval in the U.S., and it felt a bit conservative. The feedback I got was super conservative. Now we're starting to see feedback from the MA. We're starting to see feedback from the Japanese authorities. Our conviction in the drug getting approved in Europe and Japan is definitely a lot higher than it was six months ago. Then we're also starting to align with the agency on the ophthalmic indication in the eye. Now that it's a single-label study, and as Suma mentioned, there are people with natural history, we feel at the moment pretty good about 50% of the RDEB patients or 25% of the total DEB patients, however you want to look at it, also adding to the market opportunity. So we thought we'd take the moment to alleviate any confusion from prior and be very definitive on the market opportunity of B-VEC going forward. I guess just to clarify on that point, are you able to give some percentage breakdown of how much would that be from B-VEC as it currently is as VYJUVEK or B-VEC formulation? You mean the eye formulation? Look, without the eye formulation, we believe it's north of $1 billion. The eye formulation, and this is a very premature estimate from my end, probably adds another $250 million-$300 million to the opportunity itself. Excellent. Thank you very much. Thank you. The next question is coming from Joe Pantginis from H.C. Wainwright. Joe, your line is live. Hi, everybody. Good morning. Thanks for taking the question. Of course, congrats as well, but also thank you, Krish, because of the real clarity and visibility that you're providing around the launch, so we all appreciate that. I guess two questions. First, I guess when you come to the actual patients, do you have any data that you can share with us about the ranges of the treatment area sizes, number one, and then number two, I know there's great compliance so far, as you've alluded to. Anything you could share with us as to the reasons for patient stops? Thanks a lot. It's a great question, Joe. In terms of ranges and area sizes, let me say, look, as the patient population grows and as the visits are weekly, we're not particularly tracking every single patient and every single wound. But that said, through feedback through Krystal Connect, we do know that there are a good number of patients treating large wound sizes, a good number of patients choosing to start with the small ones moving into the large ones. We see no difference in the way the drug works between recurrent and chronic. And all in all, we believe that VYJUVEK has been great to treat wounds of all sizes and wounds of all cadences, as in recurring versus chronic, etc. The only point that we are working on, not immediately, but in the medium term or so, is to see if we can increase the dosage per vial per week. That would be beneficial, but that's not an immediate solution. People seem very happy with the drug. People seem very happy with the home dosing. I will say one of the best things we got on the label was home dosing. Compliance is high because of this. We see patients unwilling to even go to a local physician to get it done on a weekly basis. And so home dosing has really helped a lot with the launch. In terms of compliance, look, when we look back at our clinical studies, I mean, just before the launch or the first few months of launch, compliance was very high. We expect compliance to continue to be high in 2024, but as wounds start to heal, one has to think about maybe a handful of patients slowing down, either taking a pause and restarting or going from 4 to maybe 3 to 2 vials a month. But it's not immediate. I think our original assumption of having a patient on vials for 12 months or longer as of today continues to track properly. Great. Thank you. Really appreciate it. Thank you. The next question is coming from Andrea Tan from Goldman Sachs. Andrea, your line is live. Good morning. Thanks for taking our question. Krish, just could you speak a little bit more about the evolution of the competitive landscape as you see it and how you envision the treatment paradigm shifting if Abeona's graft is approved? Great. Hey, on the competitive landscape, Krystal was started in 2016 when we realized that the competitive landscape was not a very commercially viable approach to treating DEB. I mean, we obviously appreciate anyone and all working in this debilitating disease, but our view right now, and this could be different, since VYJUVEK has the ability to treat larger wounds, we doubt if patients would go through the inconvenience of having to graft over and over and again in the same location and takes a certain bit of time. And if you look at the convenience aspect, it gets much VYJUVEK, obviously, is much more convenient and amenable. So we're not presently watching or too anxious about an autologous approach to treating the disease at the moment. We feel that the convenience aspect of VYJUVEK is much more that it's much more convenient. Now, on the other competitive environment, which does not fundamentally address the cause of the disease, we're less concerned about that because at the end of the day, we believe that most patients and most physicians want an approach that fundamentally treats the nature of the disease. I'm just going to add another point to Abeona's therapy. Keep in mind, it's 50% wound closure. I mean, we had a high bar of 100% wound closure. So we are seeing, even with large wounds, pretty good closure. So I think, again, as Krish mentioned, easy to apply, topical. We don't have to biopsy these patients. These patients cannot stand any sort of pain or infection or hospitalization. They can't afford that. So I think from that perspective, because of ease of application and good efficacy, again, we're not concerned. Great. And then Suma, maybe one question here on the pipeline as you think about the upcoming data reads that you have across the different programs. Just wondering if you could help frame expectations into each one of those and what would trigger either a go or no-go decision to bring those forward. Thanks so much. I mean, again, 407, we are excited. We finished Cohort 1. Cohort 2 is, I mean, the acceleration of enrolling those patients is ongoing right now, so we are excited to move that and quickly into Cohort 3. We think we really believe we have already sites that are established who can do bronchoscopy, and we have now patients identified. So we believe in 407, we should, by end of the year, be able to dose those patients and have some positive bronchoscopy data. But also, we are working on some preclinical models, which we feel we have some promise in getting confidence to establish functionality for TDN to collaborate with us. So we feel pretty positive on 407. 408, again, as we mentioned, we dosed our first patient. This patient was not on augmentation therapy. So again, with the biomarkers that we are measuring, because we're going to see blood levels of A180, and again, it's easy to measure both neutrophil elastase, binding of neutrophil elastase in sputum, and see the plasma levels. We feel these biomarkers will help us identify or get a faster read on 408. And we are very excited, actually, about 408. I think with the division, the OTP division, open to biomarker approach for approval, we think with 408, we hold a good chance of getting in front of them once we have positive data to discuss a biomarker approach for approval. So again, 408 is an exciting program for us. 707 is also exciting. I mean, we have, as Krish mentioned, we haven't provided too many specifics, but the program with the intratumoral injection is moving forward. Hopefully, we'll have some outcome and data read end of the year. Of course, our lung program also, again, we are excited. Hopefully, end of the year, there could be exciting data reads on all our programs. Thank you. And if you wish to ask a question and you have not already done so, please press star one on your phone at any time. The next question is from Tim Lugo from William Blair. Congratulations on the quarter and also all the clarity. Can you give us a sense of product revenue ramping through 2024? It sounded like there was some seasonality around scheduling in Q4, and we're also two-thirds of the way through Q1. Do you have a sense if it's going to be kind of incremental increases, at least in the near term, or if there might be some lumpiness quarter to quarter? Tim, we're not providing any guidance with respect to the revenue. A nice try. Understood. Look, I was only yeah, a nice try. Look, there's not much of a seasonality. I was just pointing out that J-code transition is a one-time event. It's not a seasonal event. And with that, it's a powerful tailwind behind us. The second, as I mentioned about a handful of patients hitting the cap at the end of the year, and what we're trying to do is to kind of accrue for it as we move through the year to avoid any kind of lumpiness in Q4 one way or the other. So that said, I think as more and more patients come on drug, you can start figuring out what the revenue potential of VYJUVEK is going to be this year. But no comment from us. Understood. Maybe a question on your platform. You obviously have some unique capabilities with the platform and redosing. Are there any pipeline opportunities? You've built out a number of pipeline assets, but are there any that you looked at that might have just been too expensive to run the clinicals on that you think a partner would be appropriate for? I'm getting a sense of just how much capacity there is within the manufacturing and kind of development side. Yeah. Look, our position on this is stayed the same for large indications. I'll talk about alpha-1 antitrypsin, large indication. Some areas in oncology, large indication. In CF, we're primarily going after an augmentation, so we view it much more as a rare disease than as a really large indication. I think we are always open to partnering on large indications. The company wants to stay focused on its ability to develop, manufacture, and commercialize rare diseases and definitely would like to seek partner on larger indications. But we have enough capacity manufacturing-wise to support any partnership, small or large, with the product either in the development stage or the commercial stage. Understood. Thank you and congratulations. Thanks. Thank you. The next question is coming from Gavin Clark-Gartner from Evercore ISI. Gavin, your line is live. Hey. Thanks for taking the questions. Just had a couple of clarifications and then questions. On the 228 reimbursement approvals, I wanted to be clear. Was this also through mid-February, or was that at the end of December? It said on the deck as of February, if I'm not mistaken, and we hold to that. We're not trying not to get too cute between mid versus early versus late, but it was as of February. Okay. That's helpful. Just trying to quantify the holiday impact a little bit, were the start forms coming in in January, February? Were those actually at a higher rate than later November or December? Yes. It was a shift, right? And so that kind of affected the rate, shifting from, say, middle of December onto January, etc. Okay. Have there been any differences in the conversion rate or the conversion time between the Medicaid and commercial patients? That's a good question because it doesn't have a time dimension. Now, in the past, in your 2023, Medicaid definitely took a bit longer because there was no J-code. Different states were at different points, and commercial was doing pretty well. And I think right now, I wouldn't say starting now, going forward, I don't see a measurable difference between the two. And in fact, on the commercial side, if you end up with a single case agreement on a patient, it could take just as long as Medicaid. So I mean, to answer your question simply, and I was thinking as I was responding, we don't see any meaningful difference in time, especially going forward. And we might have seen some in the past. Okay. Great. And last one, I just wanted to ask what your latest expectations for VYJUVEK pricing in Europe was? And thanks for taking all the questions. We don't know. Look, it's a differentiated drug. The efficacy profile is very strong. We're seeing really good demand on named patient sales from a handful of countries. Our conversations with EMAs are going well. Our job is to make a case for we know it's going to be lower, but our job is to get to less than a 50% discount if we're fortunate. Less as in I hope I'm not confusing people there. Something north of, say, $15,000 per vial would be great for us. That makes sense. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is coming from Josh Schimmer from Cantor. Josh, your line is live. Great. Thanks for taking the questions. I have three quick ones. So 228 reimbursement approvals out of around 428 start forms, that's 55% conversion. For the remaining 45%, how many of those or what proportion of those do you expect to be able to capture with the new J-code and over what period of time? Second question is if you can quantify any contribution from either inventory building or name patient access in Europe. And then last question, the annual cap of $900,000 gross, is that on a per-patient basis or a per-plan basis averaged across their population? Thank you. Look, on the first one, our internal goal is to try and get to all you talked about the gap between the start forms and the thing. We're trying to get all the patients in 2023 onto reimbursement by the end of Q1. That's the goal. And then so instead of answering your question as 228 versus 428, our internal goal is all the patients who we know of at the end of 2023, we want them on reimbursement by the end of Q1. In terms of, was there any inventory or NPP? Hardly any yet. We're just starting to get NPP. It'll probably get reflected more going forward. And on the annual cap, look, it is the overall discount, I think I've mentioned this, is measured at the payer level. So it's kind of like a blended average depending on the number of patients in the plan. Thank you. Thank you. And the next question is coming from Ritu Baral from TD Cowen. Ritu, your line is live. Hi. Good morning, guys. This is Anvita for Ritu today. Congrats on the quarter. I have two questions. As you see more reauthorizations taking place, could you just expand on what's the process of that, and then what does a prescriber need to show for a successful reauthorization? I have a follow-up after that. Yeah. On the reauthorization, it happens every six months. Usually, you need. It's called clinical notes from a physician saying that VYJUVEK is working. Some of them certify without a patient visit, and some certify, wanting a patient visit. We're talking a local patient visit for the most part, and that's what it entails. Depending on the patient, it could take a certain amount of time, but usually, it's pretty quick. Got it. Then could you talk about the market research efforts in the EU ahead of your potential launch there in terms of how patients are currently managed there and now? Just to confirm, now you're expecting a launch there next year versus later this year? Thank you. Look, later, I want to be clear. It depends on when we get approved. If you saw what happened to us in the U.S., we're always adding three months to PDUFA date from this point on. It appears to be the norm rather than anything management says. Having said that, if the launch is scheduled for late in the year, say in December, we'd probably push it out to January. In terms of launch plans, I think we're going to have a general manager in Germany at the beginning of March to build out the team. That'll be the first country of launch. In terms of market research, our current EU general manager, Laurent, has already been talking to physicians and centers of excellence who have really strong registries, so we feel really good about the identified patient population. A lot of home dosing in Europe is handled by the hospital, so a lot of the logistical complications you see in the U.S., like getting home dosing in place, finding patients, are not as big issues in Europe. What is important in the EU is that we get to a good place on access. If we get to a good place with respect to access, then the EU launch becomes a bit simpler logistically than the U.S. launch and kind of very similar in Japan story. Got it. Very helpful. Thank you. Thank you. There were no other questions in queue at this time. This now concludes the call at this time. Thank you all participants for joining the Krystal Biotech fourth quarter and full year 2023 earnings call. You may now disconnect.