Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the first quarter fiscal 2023 Key Tronic Corporation conference call. Today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Brett Larsen. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. I'm Brett R. Larsen, Chief Financial Officer of Key Tronic. I would like to thank you everyone for joining us today for our investor conference call. Joining me here in our Spokane Valley headquarters is Craig D. Gates, our President and Chief Executive Officer. As always, I would like to remind you that during the course of this call, we might make projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or the company's future financial performance. Please remember that such statements are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially. For more information, you may review the risk factors outlined in the documents the company has filed with the SEC, specifically our latest 10-K, quarterly 10-Qs, and 8-K. Please note that on this call, we will discuss historical, financial, and other statistical information regarding our business and operations. Some of this information is included in today's press release, and a recorded version of this call will be available on our website. Today, we released our results for the quarter ended October 1, 2022. For the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, we reported total revenue of $137.3 million, up 9% from the previous quarter, and up 3% from $132.8 million in the same period of fiscal year 2022. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, we ramped up new programs from both longstanding and new customers. While constraints in the global supply chain continued to limit production, we saw some gradual improvements with respect to lead times for certain key components. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, our results were impacted by storm damage to our facilities in Arkansas, which reduced revenue and gross profit. We have received initial insurance proceeds to repair the plant and replace equipment, which should be completed by the second half of fiscal year 2023. These initial coverage amounts, net of equipment book value loss, are included in the reported gain on insurance claims during the quarter. For the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, our gross margin was 7.6% and operating margin was 2.4% compared to gross margin of 7.6% and an operating margin of 1.6% in the same period of fiscal year 2022. The gross margin in the first quarter of fiscal year 2023 was adversely impacted by the storm damage to our Arkansas facility and increased labor costs in both the U.S. and Mexico. While profitability is expected to improve in coming quarters with increasing expected revenue, higher interest rates on our line of credit and increase in wages will limit a portion of that expected improvement. For the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, net income was $1.2 million, or $0.11 Per share, up from $0.8 million, or $0.07 Per share for the same period of fiscal year 2022. Turning to the balance sheet, we continue to maintain a strong financial position. Despite the continuing production delays due to supply chain problems and the continued rapid transfer of new programs, we ended the first quarter with total working capital of $185.8 million and a current ratio of 2.1 to 1. At the end of the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, our inventory increased by approximately $26.2 million to roughly 18% from the same period a year ago, reflecting our preparations for significant growth in coming quarters, with much of the inventory increase being associated with the previously announced large outdoor power equipment program. While the state of the worldwide supply chain still requires that we look out much further in the future than in historical periods, we continue to carefully balance customer demand and the likelihood of successfully bringing in parts in time for planned production. In future quarters, we expect to see our net inventory turns slowly improve to more historical levels. At the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2023, trade receivables were up about $12.6 million from the same period a year ago, and our DSO was also increased to about 91 days, up from 83 days from the same period a year ago, which reflects timing of shipments to customers with extended terms and some delays in payments from customers who have been impacted by pandemic related slowdowns and restarts in their respective markets. Total capital expenditures were roughly $2.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, and we expect total CapEx for the year to be around $9 million. While we're keeping a careful eye on capital expenditures, we plan to continue to invest selectively in our production equipment, SMT equipment for plastic molding capabilities, utilizing leasing facilities as well to make efficiency improvements to prepare for growth and add capacity. Despite the ongoing disruptions from the global supply chain that will continue to significantly limit production and adversely impact operating efficiencies, we are expecting significant growth in fiscal year 2023. For the second quarter of fiscal 2023, we expect to report revenue of approximately $140 million-$150 million, and earnings of approximately $0.13-$0.18 per diluted share. We're working closely with our customers, key suppliers, and employees to minimize the effects of delays attributable to the supply chain constraints, higher costs of labor and component costs, freight and logistics, and limited availability of key components. While our facilities in the U.S., Mexico, China, and Vietnam are currently operating, uncertainty remains as to the possibility of future temporary closures, customer fluctuations in demand and costs, future supply chain disruptions, and other potential factors could significantly impact operations in coming periods. In summary, we continue to grow our pipeline of new sales prospects and continue to increase our customer demand to unprecedented levels for Key Tronic. The overall financial health of the company appears strong, and we believe that we are increasingly well-positioned to win new EMS programs and to continue to profitably expand our business over the longer term. Back to you, Craig. Okay, thanks, Brett. Despite facing continuing business challenges of worldwide component shortages, transportation bottlenecks, and increasing labor costs, we're pleased with our growing revenue and earnings during the first quarter, driven by a successful ramp of new programs and our expanding customer base. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2023, we won new programs involving auto, electric vehicles, automation, and power distribution equipment. We're also preparing for a significant ramp in production in our Mexican facilities for the previously announced program with a leading outdoor power equipment company during the second quarter. Once fully ramped, this program alone could contribute approximately $80 million in annual revenue. Global logistics problems, war in Europe, and China-U.S. geopolitical tensions continue to drive OEMs to examine their traditional outsourcing strategies. These customers increasingly realize they have become overly dependent on their China-based contract manufacturers for not only product but also for design and logistics services. As time has gone by, the decision to onshore or nearshore production has become accepted as a smart long-term strategy rather than a knee-jerk reaction. As a result, we see opportunities for Key Tronic's continued growth. As we have discussed in previous calls, we built Key Tronic to be the ideal solution for customers as they move to respond to geopolitical pressures. As you know, our facilities in Mexico represent a campus of 1.1 million sq ft of warehouse, most of which is contiguously located in nine facilities acquired over time. Our three U.S.-based manufacturing sites have also benefited greatly from macro forces driving business back to North America. Moreover, our new Vietnam facility continues to increase production levels, and the abatement of COVID-related government restrictions in Vietnam is allowing us to travel there and tour the plant with potential customers for the first time. Our Shanghai plant has added capabilities in management, staff, and systems that allow it to serve Chinese customers directly. Shanghai has replaced the business that we moved to Vietnam, and our procurement group in Shanghai, which serves the entire corporation, is critical for managing the supply issues that crippled many of our competitors without boots on the ground in China. The combination of our global footprint and our expansive design capabilities is proving to be extremely effective in capturing new business. Many of our large and medium-sized manufacturing program wins are predicated on Key Tronic's deep and broad design services. Once we have completed a design and wrapped it into production, our knowledge of a program's specific design challenges makes that business extremely sticky. We also invested in vertical integration and manufacturing process knowledge, including a wide range of plastic molding, injection, blow molding, gas assist, multi-shot, as well as PCB assembly, metal forming, painting and coating, complex high-volume automated assembly, and the design, construction, and operation of complicated test equipment. This expertise sets Key Tronic apart from our competitors of a similar size. As a result, a customer looking to leave their contract manufacturer finds a one-stop shop in Key Tronic, which makes the transition to our facilities much less risky for them than cobbling together a group of providers, each limited to a portion of the value chain. In recent years, the pandemic and supply shortages have constricted both our top and bottom line performance and obscured the amplitude and velocity of the growing wave of new business. Nevertheless, the fact that we are achieving record revenue in the midst of continuing and unprecedented supply issues is an indicator of our growing momentum. Moving further into fiscal 2023, the headwinds from the global supply chain continue to present uncertainty and multiple business challenges, but do show some signs of abating, particularly with respect to the recent price stabilization for some commodity components. At the same time, these price reductions are offset by increasing wages at our North American facilities. We believe global logistic problems, China-U.S. political tensions, and heightened assurance of supply concerns will continue to drive the favorable trend of contract manufacturing returning to North America. As well as to our expanding Vietnam facilities. We see the potential for significant growth in fiscal 2023 and beyond. This concludes the formal portion of the presentation. Brett and I will now be pleased to answer your questions. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you'd like to ask a question, you may do so by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. Using the speakerphone, please make sure your mute function is turned off by your similar HGR equipment. Again, star one for questions. We'll pause a moment to assemble the phone queue. We'll take our first question from Bill Dezellem with Tieton Capital. Please go ahead. Thank you. Nice quarter and nice guidance. Pardon me. Nothing. Go ahead, Bill. Okay. I'm sorry. I thought I heard a noise coming through the line. Of the four new customer wins that you announced, what is the size of each of those? The audio equipment is 15. The automation controls, 15. Commercial product production is five. Power distribution is five. Great. Thank you. Do we have this correct, that if you hit the $40 million low end of your guidance range, that would be a record revenue quarter for you all? Is that right? Yeah. Well, congratulations. Let me shift, if I may, to the Arkansas flood. Could you walk us through what happened? I guess I haven't heard about any floods, but maybe that had been overtaken by hurricanes or other big events that took place. Sure. I have some financial questions. You bet. That was actually a lightning strike that occurred at our Fayetteville facility that impacted some of our production equipment. What was the revenue impact and the earnings impact as you calculate it? You know, somewhere around $2.5 million of revenue. It's difficult to ascertain the exact bottom line impact, but somewhere between 10% and 20% of that number. If we do that, math of 10%-20% of $2.5 million, that's gonna be up to $500,000. So the plant damage was actually greater than the actual financial impact in the first quarter. Yeah. The gain is actually associated with the equipment replacement. Mm-hmm. You know, of course, that has an impact on the gross profit as we discussed. We're still analyzing and working with the insurance carrier on business interruption, but we have no value at this point. You do have business interruption insurance. It's just that the negotiation process is underway. Correct. That's helpful. Back to you, Brett. Yep. That can take some time, though. Right. So when we look at the kind of stepping back away from the Arkansas flood, the gross margin declined sequentially from 9.3%. Some of that impact is the Arkansas flood as you pointed out. Then there's another component that this would not be in there. What besides the Arkansas plant pulled the gross margin down sequentially? A couple of things. One, we have increased wages that we've discussed during the quarter. The other is some inefficiencies associated with essentially starting up new production for new programs. We are definitely in the ramp phase of a number of those programs. That, of course, has a detriment to your overall gross profit until you can stabilize those. How long do you anticipate it will be before those are stabilized? I think we'll throughout fiscal 2023, we're going to be introducing new programs. You know, I think a large part of the decrease in gross profit this quarter was related to getting ready for the large $80 million program that starts this quarter. I don't know if it'll ever stabilize. That was probably the wrong. We hope never to be stabilized. Yes. We always want to be ramping new programs. Were you ramping new programs last quarter? Yep. Okay. Where I'm going with all this, maybe I'm over-mathing this situation. If I look at the sequential change in gross margin, assuming that you can go back to 9.3% and still be ramping new production, you had the Arkansas plant impact. If we were to add back in the insurance proceeds, I mean, ultimately, there's roughly a $0.10 sequential impact, so that what $0.11 number that you reported this quarter would otherwise be somewhere closer to a $0.21 number. I'm just assuming a 25% tax rate on my incremental dollars. Is there anything that I'm maybe directionally missing? I may be off by a few pennies, but directionally missing with thinking about this? Yeah. I think we mentioned in our fourth quarter press release and earnings call that the gross margin was higher than historical numbers, and that it would more than likely drop down to more historical levels. Some of that is mix. Some of that is price increases to capture some of the increased costs that were incurred earlier on last year through the first three quarters. I think that 9.3% gross margin is higher than what I would expect going forward. Okay. That is helpful. Kind of backing off of the actual math, just qualitatively, would you concur with the idea that as you improve efficiencies and as your revenue grows, that there is an opportunity for that gross margin to expand from this quarter's level, and therefore there is an opportunity to see some faster earnings growth as a result of the revenue growth? Absolutely. Completely concur with that. Okay, great. Thank you both. Again, nice quarter and sounds like a beginning to a good trend. Thank you. Yep. Thank you. We'll take our next question from Sheldon Grodsky with Grodsky Associates. Please go ahead. Hello, everybody. One of the things I didn't hear you mention in going over the quarter's results is the SEC investigation. Were there no costs associated with that? Has the SEC said, "Okay, we're done," or is it just at a lower level of activity or something else? It was a lower level activity. It was what? It was a lower level activity than in the past few quarters. Any idea whether it's gonna stay that way? I have no comment on the SEC. Okay, I'll let someone else ask a question. As a reminder, star one for questions. We'll take our next question from George Melas-Kyriazi with MKH Management. Please go ahead. Thank you. Hi, good afternoon, guys. Just as a follow-up to that question, what was the cost associated with the SEC investigation into Teleperformance? It was roughly $200,000 for the whole quarter. Okay, great. Brett R. Larsen, do you have a slightly better crystal ball than Craig D. Gates on the SEC investigation? I will follow my leader. I have no comment. George, if you look back at the transcripts for the last year and a quarter, my comment has been no comment, and it will remain to be no comment. Okay. Well, I would try to see if we can get something else. Okay. Another question for Brett. The SG&A this quarter was sort of back where it used to be. Of course, that was helped partly by the lower SEC investigation cost. But it's, if you normalize for that, it's. No, I guess it's about the normal level. Is that what we should expect for the rest of the year? Yes. Essentially, you have 57 minus 20. Like, 55 would be sort of the ongoing SG&A expenses that we should expect. Yeah. I'd expect operating expenses to maintain somewhere near the 6% range. Yes. Okay. That, of course, includes engineering, the 6%, right? Yeah. Correct. Okay, great. Even as you ramp up revenue and programs, you think we can still maintain about that level? Well, I guess it's a percentage of revenue. Okay. In terms of inventory that went out the gate, I know I remember you had a fair amount of inventory that was in your warehouses that was owned by the customer. What is the situation there? Is that still at similar levels or maybe is it coming down? Actually, the inventory that is in our warehouses that is owned by customers, that amount has grown. Okay. will continue to do so as inventory that we bought with an agreement with our customer that we, if we were to own that for 60 days, 90 days, 120 days, depending on what we negotiated, that inventory would age out, and our customer would be forced to pay us for that inventory. It was a tit for tat agreement because our customers want product and wanted us to take a chance that we would get that last component that we're having trouble finding. That's why they agreed to these arrangements. As time goes by, we're in kind of a. I'd say we're getting close to an inflection point on that, as more and more of this inventory that we bought on the come, so to speak, that is eventually covered by the customer, ages out, and we are paid for it. I don't know, trying to predict the trend of your questioning, but the fact that we have more in our warehouse that's already been paid for is actually a good thing rather than a bad thing. Because it helped, because it's not a union problem, it helps you with production. Right. We were able to go procure and secure parts. Yeah. That may have otherwise been snapped up by somebody else while we were looking for the one part we couldn't find. Yet eventually our customer funded all of that in case we were not successful in finding that last part. Very good. Okay. Remind us the major sort of new program, the outdoor power equipment program. Did that come from China? Was it made under contract manufacturing or an in-house program? Tell us a bit about the history of that and when do you expect it to be fully ramped? That program we expect to be ramping in a couple of weeks. It came from a company who is in the power equipment business but is entering a new segment. They have their distribution channel with orders already in place. This isn't a speculative number that we're giving out as long as everything goes as per plan. This is not an example of something that came back out of China or out of Asia or somewhere else. However, it is an example of an OEM that was asked by the end customer to enter the business because the product currently available was not up to their standards. Okay. Was that a new customer for you guys, or was it somebody you worked with previously? Yeah, that's a new customer for us. Yeah. Okay. As we've talked about in the past, we've got a bunch of engineers, including me, who now know how to design a piece of power equipment that we hadn't known anything about a year ago, which will lead to more opportunities as everything else we've designed has done. It's been fun. A lot of our stuff is small, sitting on a bench with oscilloscope hooked to it, and this stuff has been outside making lots of noise and banging into stuff and breaking things. It's been a fun change. I guess you still have your engineering hat on, right, from time to time. Yeah. Otherwise, I go insane. Okay. Sort of going back to what the line of questioning that Bill had at the beginning in terms of the gross margin and the ramp of programs, it seems like this particular program sort of took a hit on your the gross margin in the September quarter. Do you expect this quarter to be the bottom for the year in terms of gross margin and to have a progressive improvement after that? I'd say probably. There's a lot of moving parts to gross margin, as you know. Our business is not steady state because we're adding so many new customers, and different facilities are growing so rapidly. When you're trying to ramp an $80 million program at the same time, we're growing the domestic sites from $120 million to probably $180 million plus. At the same time, we've got biting inflation going on with 10%, so who the hell knows what's actually gonna happen. When you throw all that into the calculator and try and come up with a number. In general, more volume, more revenue always turns out good for us. Okay. Very good. Thank you. Yep. We'll take our next question from Bill Dezellem with Tieton Capital. Please go ahead. Thank you. I wanna circle back to your comment, Craig, that this power equipment company will be $80 million annually. If we think about that, just for linear quarters, which may or may not be correct, that you're not even close to providing a guidance of a $20 million sequential increase, at least at the midpoint. Is there something else going on here that we're not taking into account? Or is it just early enough in the ramp since you said it's not gonna start ramping until a couple weeks from now? As I said, stuff is still going around and dusting, so we're being cautious about predicting when this ramp hits full speed. You did have- Actually- Oh, I'm sorry, Craig, go ahead. Actually, about a week ago, it quit going around in circles and breaking. I think the numbers we projected for this quarter are pretty safe. We hope that they in no way are the same as they would be if we had started on October one, full speed. Is this a product that has some seasonal deadline or anything of that nature? Or is it more of a consistent year-round nature? The spirit where I'm going with this question is if there is some seasonal deadline, are you tight on that, and therefore we could see a really big jump from this quarter, the Q2 to the March quarter in Q3 as they try to catch up or you try to catch up? That's a nice try, Bill, to get me to predict out more than a quarter and better camouflage than most, but I caught it, and the answer is, no comment. Well, thank you for at least acknowledging that it was a nice try. I appreciate that. Shifting, if I may, to inventory. There was a discussion earlier about inventories, and you did have inventories up about $13 million sequentially. Would you discuss kind of what's happening behind the scenes with that, really relative to the conversation you were having before about buying for some customers in advance, I'll say at risk, but with a limited time period until the customer buys the product? Well, the majority of that increase was due to the delay of about a month and a quarter, month and two weeks, month and a week of the power equipment deal. That inventory is coming in now, and we're just about to start building and shipping that. That was a bump in inventory levels. There was about, I don't know, $3 million or so bump in the domestic site's inventory due to the fact, as I said before, they're growing pretty significantly from 1.0 to 1.70 to 1.80 to 1.90. Overall inventory for the rest of the company was flat or a little bit down, which is basically a win in term base compared to how many millions of dollars we missed in building that we were hoping to build because a part didn't show up on time. Right. Okay. That's helpful. I'm gonna come back to my thinly veiled question about the future. I'm gonna actually, in all seriousness, try to make it answerable. Is there, without you answering it and giving me an opportunity just to think it through, does this product tend to have seasonality to it? If so, kind of what is its season? I'm not commenting on that anymore because we are still under an information lockdown with the customer. Thank you. Again, really, a nice quarter for guidance. Thank you. Thanks. Thanks, Thanks, Bill. We're open for questions. We'll go next to Sheldon Grodsky with Grodsky Associates. Please go ahead. Yeah. Could you describe? Sheldon, no comment. No comment. No comment on the SEC, Sheldon. Could you describe what kind of transportation bottlenecks you're presently suffering from? Yeah, there's still, even though the prices are coming down for air freight and ocean shipments, containers, there's still a problem with trains here in the States, pretty bad problem. There's still problems with getting trucking scheduled. It's quite a bit better than it was, but it's still not the way it needs to be. Okay. Thank you. Yep. We'll take our next question from George Melas-Kyriazi with MKH Management. Please go ahead. Thank you. Trying to understand a little bit sort of customer mix and customer concentration. Let me pick up my phone here. Okay. If I look at the last year, your top customer had grown very fast in the previous couple of years. Then there was a very meaningful decline. I think probably they had some COVID-related revenue that came down. The rest of the business grew incredibly fast. Those kinds of mix changes, does that create disruption in the operation and suddenly inventory? Kinda the question is, how do you manage that? Because over the last few years, that's been pretty extreme at times. Well, the shift in customer workload doesn't really give us difficulties as long as we have a reasonable time, let's call it a quarter of a year or more to react. One quarter you said? Yeah. There have been. Let's see. There was one customer who we are still arguing with over how much money they owe us in inventory. As the inventory burns off, the arguments are getting less heated. That customer cut their forecast by two-thirds inside of a quarter. Okay. That was a customer that was running about $6 million a quarter. The answer to your overall question is, all of our inventory issues, not all, but 99% of our inventory issues have been caused by unpredictable deliveries of components from our suppliers to us. A very, very small percentage of the issues are caused by customers suddenly dropping their forecasts and us being stuck with a bunch of parts coming in that we have to hold on to before they have to pay us 60 days or 90 days, 120 days later. The cost of the factory. I wish you could go tour the factory because it's a point of pride among all of us. All of our factories are almost breathtaking as you walk through there and see the mix of products that are being built and understand the flexibility within each of those facilities as we can move people and processes up, down, around, backwards and sideways to match up with demand. It's just, it's hard to get your mind around 4,000 people in 1,001 sq ft making so many different products from, you know, from really anything you can think of, from something that's worth $0.99 up to something that's worth $5,000. Right. Okay. That's pretty clear. In a way, the real issue with the inventory is the volatility of supply, and as that comes down, your life should become a little easier. Yeah. The thing that's kind of annoying about that is most of the MRP systems, including ours, were never designed to deal effectively with these kinds of surprises or you get a note one day that says that, "Yeah, those 10,000 parts that were supposed to ship yesterday, we didn't ship them, and we're not gonna ship them for a year." As we've poured a lot of time and sweat, blood and tears into modifying systems and processes so that and actually policy in dealing with our customers, all this work we've done to modify this so that we can drive our inventory down even with a messed up supply chain. I'd say in about five months, as the recession hits, it's gonna go, you know, it's not gonna be needed anymore. We'll be back to the normal stuff. It's made our systems quite a bit more robust and quite a bit more error-proof, so you know, it'll all be good in the end. Okay. Okay, very good. Thank you. Star one for questions. We'll pause a moment. It appears we have no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back to your presenters for any additional or closing remarks. Okay. Thank you, everyone, for participating, and we'll talk to you next quarter. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference. We appreciate your participation. You may now disconnect.