Hello. Welcome to the Q4 full-year 2022 earnings conference call. My name is Caroline, and I'll be your coordinator for today's event. Please note this call is being recorded, and for the duration of the call, your lines will be on listen-only mode. However, you will have the opportunity to ask questions at the end of the call. This can be done by pressing star one on your telephone keypad to register your questions. If you require assistance at any point, please press star zero, and you'll be connected to an operator. I will now hand over the call to your host, Mr. Roger Kuebel, to begin today's conference. Thank you. Thank you, Caroline. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today for KVH Industries' fourth quarter results, which are included in the earnings release we published this morning. Joining me on the call are the company's Chief Executive Officer, Brent Bruun, and Chief Operating Officer, Bob Balog. Before we dive in, a couple of quick announcements. If you would like a copy of the earnings release, it is available on our website and from our investor relations team. If you would like to listen to a recording of today's call, it will be available on our website. If you are listening via the web, feel free to submit questions to ir@kvh.com. This conference call will contain certain forward-looking statements that are subject to numerous assumptions and uncertainties that may cause our actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise any of these statements. We will also discuss adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure. You'll find a definition of this measure in our press release, as well as a reconciliation to comparable GAAP numbers. We encourage you to review the cautionary statements made in our SEC filings, specifically those under the heading Risk Factors in our third quarter Form 10-Q filed on December 6, 2022, and our 2022 Form 10-K, which we expect to file sometime this afternoon. The company's other SEC filings are available directly from the investor information section of our website. Now, to walk you through the highlights of our fourth quarter, I'll turn the call over to Brent. Thank you, Roger. Good morning, everyone. I gotta tell you, I'm tremendously excited to be with you today and to discuss our remarkable turnaround and our plans going forward. In March of 2022, we set out to reshape KVH. To do so, we knew we needed to pursue several goals. First, to bring our operating expenses in line with revenue. Second, to focus the company on our core businesses. Three, grow our subscriber base and airtime revenue. Fourth, to put our company on the road to sustained and increasing profitability. I'm extremely pleased to inform you that we have delivered on every one of those goals. In the fourth quarter, we achieved our first operating profit in more than six years. We divested our core inertial navigation and radio businesses earlier this year. We focused all of our efforts on mobile connectivity and value-added services, including the successful launch of our unique hybrid connectivity solution and three new services that meet vital customer needs and enhance their experience. Our fourth quarter revenue was $36 million, a 2% increase year-over-year. Our operating income for the quarter was $600,000 versus an operating loss of $3.9 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. As I mentioned a few moments ago, that's our first operating profit in more than six years. Additionally, our adjusted EBITDA was $4.3 million versus $700,000 in the fourth quarter of 2021. Our airtime revenue for the quarter increased 12% to $26.8 million with an associated gross profit margin of 43.5%. We also continued to add airtime subscribers, ending 2022 with roughly 6,900 users on our network. We continued our expansion into India, an exciting new market for us. We're currently shipping our legacy TracPhone V7-HTS systems into India, but we'll shift to our new TracNet H-series when we receive regulatory approvals. We're also thrilled by the recent recognition of TracNet's innovative design, superior performance, and critical user benefits. We recently received the SMART4SEA Connectivity Award, while the editors of Cruising World, Yachting, Boating, and Salt Water Sportsman named TracNet the editor's choice in their best marine electronics award. We appreciate this recognition from industry leaders and the positive feedback and demand from our channel partners and customers. We're launching a significant new initiative that will enable us to convert VSAT antennas made by companies like Intellian and Cobham to work on our VSAT network. We'll now be able to do this with no hardware changes, making conversions quick, convenient, and easy. We're currently in the process of transitioning approximately 50 new super yacht customers from a network integrator. These new vessels, all of which use third-party antennas, can potentially add $1.5 million in annual airtime revenue without any hardware changes. We are receiving requests from a number of our airtime service providers to begin converting terminals onboard several commercial vessels. We look forward to expanding this program in the coming months. In an industry with a growing list of competitors, airtime services can't be our sole driver for growth. We offer far more than a simple data pipe. Our value-added services are a vital differentiator in the market as we provide full feature end-to-end solution. We recently launched 3 new services. Our enterprise-grade managed firewall for enhanced cybersecurity and network management, all powered by industry leader Fortinet. Our new cloud email solution, which offers flexibility and security for fleets and crew, and expanded crew internet services for our TracNet H-series terminals. This is only the start of our strategic focus on value-added services. We plan to add new services through in-house development and partnerships. These additions are an opportunity to upsell our existing customers and increase the appeal for new sales. Doing so will enable us to retain and grow our subscriber base by making KVH airtime and services even more integral to the operations and success of our customers. We recognize, however, that our actions are not taking place in a vacuum. Non-geostationary orbit or NGSO services like Starlink, OneWeb, mPOWER, and others are already beginning to deliver service or are on the horizon. They offer benefits such as higher speeds and lower latency to commercial and leisure mariners. They also face challenges in regards to performance and coverage, and the fact that they are data pipes with none of the vital features and services that seafarers use every day. Those challenges can be solved by a hybrid solution using our TracNet terminals. TracNet offers a fully integrated hybrid hub designed for companion systems. The combination of our terminals with integrated VSAT, 5G, Wi-Fi, together with new LEO and MEO services, will enable us to offer robust, affordable, multi-channel, multi-orbit hybrid solutions. That's why we are now beginning to resell Starlink high-performance marine terminals as a companion to our TracNet and TracPhone systems. We're only selling these terminals in tandem with new TracNet sales or for existing TracNet and TracPhone systems. Subscribers must have an active KVH VSAT data plan to access our advanced intelligent hybrid switching, while Starlink service activation will be handled directly by Starlink. We're anticipating adding new LEO and MEO partners as these services launch, with a hybrid approach will deliver benefits above and beyond what NGSO services offer on their own. These benefits include committed information rates for guaranteed data speeds, service level agreements for reliable performance, sophisticated end-user network management tools, multiple channels and satellites to overcome blockage and signal loss, and our expanding suite of value-added services. We believe that the future of onboard connectivity will not be a single solution or service. The future is multi-channel and multi-orbit, and we are well-positioned to deliver that. Looking ahead to 2023, we have set aggressive goals to drive growth, increase our subscriber base, and build long-term value for our shareholders. Among these are to expand our suite of value-added services, to gain scale through organic growth, and to pursue airtime subscriber growth through new hardware-agnostic approaches. All these support our overarching vision of obtaining sustained revenue growth and consistent profitability through innovation, a commitment to superior service, and a focus on strategic and wise investments. To wrap it up, 2022 was a challenging year for us, but one in which we made exciting, future-focused progress. We've achieved tremendous success in turning the company around financially, launched new products and services that will drive subscriber and revenue growth, and putting KVH on the road to sustained profitability. I am immensely proud of our global team, their efforts, and their commitment that has delivered on the promises we made to our investors last March. I'm excited about our prospects for the future. Now I'll turn the call over to Roger for the financial details. Thanks, Brent. I would like to note that unless specifically stated otherwise, my comments relate to our continuing operations, which exclude the results of our inertial navigation business, which was sold on August ninth of last year. As Brent mentioned earlier, our fourth quarter revenue came in at $36.0 million, increasing $0.7 million from the $35.3 million recorded in the fourth quarter of 2021. Our gross profit margin was 35% for the fourth quarter as compared with 33% in the fourth quarter of the prior year. Service revenue for the fourth quarter was $28.8 million, an increase of $1.8 million or 7% from $27.0 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. This increase was primarily due to a $3.0 million increase in mini-VSAT Broadband airtime revenue, primarily offset by a $1.2 million decrease in our content service sales, which was largely due to the sale of our radio business in April of last year. As Brent noted, airtime revenue grew to $26.8 million or approximately 12% over the fourth quarter of 2021, and total subscribers reached almost 6,900. As a reminder, total subscribers include those who have temporarily suspended their primary airtime service but continue to pay minimum fees. Airtime gross margin was 43.5%, which is up 9 percentage points from the prior year. This increase is due to a combination of factors, primarily the growth in our subscriber base and the shutdown of our legacy network at the end of 2021. We are very pleased with these results. However, as I mentioned on our last call, we expect that going forward, our target for airtime margins will be in the high thirties. Product revenue for the fourth quarter was $7.2 million, a decrease of $1.1 million or 13% from the $8.2 million in the fourth quarter of the prior year. This decrease in product sales was due to a $1.6 million decrease in VSAT product sales, offset by a $0.5 million increase in TV receive-only product sales. The decline in VSAT sales was primarily due to the high level of unit sales in the prior year to customers migrating to our HTS network. We sold almost 300 units to these customers in Q4 of 2021. Operating expenses for the quarter were $12 million, down $3.6 million or 23% from the fourth quarter of 2021. While the $12 million for Q4 would seem to imply a run rate of $48 million exiting the year, there were a few unusual favorable items such that a normalized run rate would be more like $13 million. I should also note that year-over-year comparisons are difficult as the sale of the inertial navigation business required us to make estimates on the allocation of prior expenses that were shared between the two businesses. Even with that taken into account, the actions we took in March and September have led to a very significant savings and have reset OpEx to an appropriate level. At the operating income level, these changes in revenue, margins, and operating expenses resulted in a profit from operations of approximately $600,000. This was the first time since the third quarter of 2016 that KVH has had a quarterly operating profit. While this was a major accomplishment, we cannot be content with merely breaking even. Our task now is to grow profitability so that we earn an appropriate return on the capital we are using. Our bottom line net income from continuing operations was $0.6 million, compared to prior year's net loss of $2.7 million. EPS for the fourth quarter was a net profit of $0.03 per share, compared with a net loss of $0.15 per share in 2021. You will note that we are no longer reporting non-GAAP income or EPS, as we have come to believe that it is a less reliable metric given all the subjective assumptions required to measure it. Our adjusted EBITDA for the quarter was a positive $4.3 million, compared with a positive $0.7 million in the fourth quarter of 2021. For a complete reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA, please refer to the earnings release that was published earlier this morning. I need to caveat that by adding that changes in working capital provided $5.7 million of that due to an unusual increase in accounts payable at year-end. Without the change in working capital, cash from ops would have still been over $4.6 million. Capital expenditures for the quarter were $3.4 million, so even without the benefit from working capital, our operational cash flow, including CapEx, was positive by over $1 million. Cash used in investing activities other than CapEx was $0.5 million, and cash provided by financing activities was $0.1 million, resulting in an ending cash balance of approximately $76 million. We expect that to come down in the first quarter as our accounts payable returns to a normal level. Before wrapping up 2022, I'd like to take a moment to reflect on what has been accomplished. In 2021, the company had an operating loss of $20 million, which followed a $23 million loss the prior year. When we announced the restructuring and new strategic direction in March of 2022, we set a goal of breaking even in the second half of the year for operating profit, assuming that supply chain problems didn't persist. Unfortunately, they did. However, despite that, we only came up $400,000 short, and we turned an operating profit in Q4 without any big windfall. While, as I said earlier, we can't be content with just breaking even, I hope you agree that this was a pretty amazing turnaround, and it was all due to the hard work by a dedicated leadership team and amazing employees. This concludes our prepared remarks, and I will now turn the call over to the operator to open the line for the Q&A portion of this morning's call. Caroline, please proceed with Q&A. Sure. Thank you. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please signal by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. We will take the first question from line Chris Quilty. Line is open now. Please go ahead. Thank you. Congratulations, guys, and, impressive EBITDA guidance for the year going ahead. I just, you know, maybe Roger, if you can talk through, obviously we know the revenue assumptions, but are there additional, cost-cutting actions, or have you just found that the, you know, the run rate on the OpEx has been better than expected? Because if I understood correctly- Yeah. You're still sort of guiding margins to the same level. Yeah. I think the, you know, we were pretty conservative when I gave the guidance back in, I think it was, you know, back when we did the March announcement. I think it or maybe it was a response to a question, and I said we were expecting like, you know, $5 million-$6 million. It's actually turned out to be more like, you know, up closer to $10 million. That's been good. We don't see any sort of restructuring going forward. Obviously, we reserve the right to make changes in the business, just as any normal business would with respect to cost. With in terms of sort of structuring the business, we feel like we're now in a very good position. You know, we did some work, some changes in September after we sold inertial nav. We now feel like we're in a good position. We've got the right team in place, and we're gonna move forward with the initiatives that Brent talked about. Gotcha. Maybe just shifting gears over to a little bit more high level and excuse me, I'm at the satellite show now, and, you know, there's probably one of the bigger topics here has been Starlink and their enterprise rollout. Obviously they have a very aggressive model that they're working with partners. Not a lot of ways for them to give profitability to the channel. You know, as you look out and guide the expectations for next year, you know, does that Starlink, to the degree we see, you know, broader adoption, impact your overall reported margins? Or do you see ways to offset that with the bundled services that you offer associated with the Starlink service? Yeah. Hi, Chris. It's Brent. It's primarily the latter. It's the bundled service. It's the, you know, the full feature set of services that we provide. We're being a bit conservative as far as airtime margins, as Roger alluded to. The main reason for the margin conservativeness is in anticipation that we may have a bit of erosion, but we're hopeful that we can avoid it. Gotcha. The, the other big trend I think the largest announcement here was Amazon coming out with their new antennas, electronically steep flat panel antennas, and they're implying costs in hundreds of dollars, whereas typically with VSAT terminals we're talking, you know, 5 figures. Right ... to purchase those. You know, where do you see the technology evolution on the antenna side going, you know, in the future, and it's both, you know, in terms of pricing and type of units used. In the maritime market, you know, where you guys live and work every day, can a flat panel antenna, you know, actually deal with the maritime environment given, you know, ships move around a lot and there's a lot of roll-off with those flat panel antennas, or, you know, is it they're simply cheap enough that you're gonna blanket six or seven of these all over the ship, so you've always got a look angle? I mean, is that a reasonable way or are there challenges, you know, just from a wiring engineering perspective, that flat panels, you think will be more of a marginal technology in the long term? I'll let Bob answer the detail question, but I think you correctly summarized the situation. If you have one, you probably have a lot of roll-off. If you have space where you can have multiple and you can switch from one to the other, you could probably mitigate that quite a bit. I'll pass it to Bob. Yeah. I mean, it really it You know, the solution we're behind right now is, you know, a hybrid integration of those panels into the system, into our systems. Part of the reason behind that is you could probably do multiple antennas on a vessel, right? You're really talking about at a minimum, you know, like five panels to cover your pitch and roll. It's really not just your pitch and roll, there's limitations in geographic coverage, and there's limitations with blockage as well. You're always gonna be in a situation where for a commercial or for a high reliability application, you're gonna wanna make sure you have connectivity. You know, we're gonna continue to integrate those panels into the solutions that we have already, and we're pretty comfortable that's gonna provide the best, you know, most reliable solution. Great. When you think about the, you know, just sort of the macro environment here with, you know, COVID ending in China, shipping rates picking up, I mean, where are you seeing demand signals, you know, strength in demand signals on the maritime side? In terms of the leisure market, you know, where you've had a good position, again, do flat panels, I think certainly in the RV market, you've seen some challenge there. In the broader consumer market or consumer leisure, do you see, you know, as a different metric in terms of the enterprise, where clearly operational performance matters, you know, targeting the consumer market might be more successful for something like a Starlink or a Kuiper service? Well, I would say, Dan, to answer your last question, I would say that that's the market that is most exposed from our perspective to moving over to some of the new services. You had a question to begin with as to where do we see new market opportunity. As I alluded to, India is a huge market, and they've just recently enabled Ku-band VSAT into that market, where it's been an L-band market for a number of years. As we move on, talking about L-band, there's still a tremendous number of L-band terminals out there that are still transitioning to, you know, better communication systems. Uh, is there- I'm not sure if you had another question there? You had, you had. That was a very long sentence. No, it was. It might have been two or three or four questions. I'll do them in shorter questions, but maybe just the final follow on there on India, you know, a question of if there is sufficient capacity, because ISRO historically the sole capacity provider, I know there's been, you know, a lot of challenge for operators to actually get Ku capacity to provide services in that market. Yeah. Yeah. Through our partnership with Intelsat, we're completely buttoned up as far as capacity is concerned. Gotcha. Is there a prospect for new capacity coming online in the future that, you know, you can actually drive some incremental growth in that market? It is gonna be new capacity coming online, whether it comes from Intelsat or others. You see how many satellites are under construction and whether it's GEO or NGSO. I don't think capacity is a concern. Okay. Great, thank you for all the feedback. Welcome. Thanks. Thanks. Thank you. We will take the next question from line Ryan Koontz from Needham. The line is open now. Please go ahead. Thanks. real quick, clarification. We talked about that $5 million-$6 million becoming $10 million. That was the EBITDA from the cost adjustments you made? No. It was the savings, the reduction in OpEx, which is a little, you know. That comment I made early on or last year rather, early last year, was when we still had inertial nav. We've had even with. Got it. Yeah. It's OpEx. OpEx run rate. OpEx. Yeah. Thanks. Then, you know, if you dumb this down for me a little bit, on the, you know, the kind of value proposition of Starlink versus your, your, VSAT product. Is Starlink a lower cost per bit? Does it provide additional coverage? Can you kind of clarify how it fits in your, in the value prop there for the Starlink partnership? Oh, yeah. I mean, it's lower cost per bit. It's a bit lower latency. You can have dropouts and packet loss and jitters. A combined service with what we already offer, an integrated service with our GEO, you know, LTE/5G and Wi-Fi combined with that will give you a robust service. I talked about some of our other backend tools and CIR, SLAs and everything. That all comes together and it's coming through the VSAT component of our, of our offering. You wanna add to that? Yeah. I mean, it's kind of if you follow the concept behind our H-series products, right? We're delivering VSAT services with those products. When available, we're latching on to 5G or LTE services because that'll give the end user a little better throughput and performance. When available from there, we'll also bridge over to available marina Wi-Fis. Really, if you think about this concept, you know, if you have a Starlink available, you know, and it's working in the marina, why not use it? Why not give the user that opportunity? The real value that we have or that we add to this is that the way we actively monitor, switch, and make all of this happen seamlessly so that no one has to think about it, no one has to worry about switching connections or what's available. We just make sure that the end user's experience is, you know, the best it can possibly be. Got it. And that's really helpful. You'll also handle the Starlink subscription and Starlink billing. No. No. as part of the whole package? No. We will not. As Edward remarked, the activation, for the Starlink terminal will be handled between the end user and Starlink directly. Okay. All right. Got it. That's helpful. You talked about some development partners as well, in terms of bringing new products to market. Can you kinda clarify what sort of applications? What kind of market segments that'll help you in terms of kind of the product side? Well, marine focus, but it's value-added services to make onboard operations more efficient. We can't really go into a lot of details at this point in time, but we will in due course. I mean, It's probably sufficient to say, you know, we're looking at people. You know, we've mentioned Fortinet a few times, security, firewalling. Yeah. You know, that's what they do best, and they do it on large scale commercial networks. We wanna look for appliances, applications, and value adds that are really being developed for sort of a broader market, and then bring them to the marine specialization of, you know, sort of exactly what we're delivering and make sure we're utilizing sort of best in class technology rather than trying to develop something and do it on our own. There's a lot of cases where, you know, some of that stuff just needs to be adapted. Sure. That's kinda enterprise caliber. Gotcha. Yeah. That's really helpful. That's all the questions I had. You know, congrats on the operating profit. Really, really great work, guys. Thanks so much. Thanks. Thanks, Ryan. Thank you. There's no further question at this time. Okay. All right. Well, thank you, operator. Thank you, everyone. Given that there are no questions, I appreciate everyone's joining the call who is on, and thank you, and have a good day. Thank you. Take care. Thanks, everyone. Thank you for joining today's call. You may now disconnect.