Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and a warm welcome to the Lion Electric first quarter 2023 results conference call. At this time, all participants are on listen-only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Isabelle Adjahi, Vice President of Investor Relations and Sustainable Development. Please go ahead, Ms. Adjahi. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Lion's first quarter 2023 results conference call. Today, I'm here with Marc Bédard, our CEO founder, and Nicolas Brunet, our EVP and CFO. Please note that our discussion may include estimates and other forward-looking information and that our actual results could differ materially from those implied in any such statements. We invite you to review the cautionary language in this morning's press release and in our MD&A which contains important information regarding various factors, assumptions, and risks that could impact our actual results. With that, let me turn it over to Marc to begin. Marc? Thank you, Isabelle. Good morning, everyone. We are pleased to share with you today our Q1 results and to report that Lion is showing great progress, setting a strong foundation to execute our plan. There are three main items we will be talking about today. Number one, we continued our sequential growth in vehicle production and deliveries, announcing today our 6th consecutive quarter of delivery growth. Number two, manufacturing operations at both our Joliet vehicle plant and our battery factory are now underway and will gradually ramp up over the course of the year. Number three, with production ramping up in all three of our plants, we are focused on achieving profitability and are putting the right elements in place to achieve this key objective. We will now provide color on each of these items before we open the line for questions. Let's begin with deliveries and orders. During the quarter, we delivered 220 vehicles. This is the sixth quarter in a row of sequential growth in vehicle deliveries. We delivered more vehicles in Q1 than we did in all of fiscal 2021, the year in which we became a public company. We now have more than 1,100 vehicles on the road in real-life operating conditions. Our purchase order book currently stands at 2,565 vehicles for a total order value of $625 million. It includes orders for 2,270 electric school buses. We secured 289 orders in the EPA Clean School Bus Program, representing a total order value of approximately $105 million, and we are working to obtain additional orders from awardees who have obtained extensions from the EPA. Nicolas will provide further details regarding this program, including the upfront payments that have been made and are expected to be made by the EPA. I am also pleased to announce that the EPA recently released guidelines for the second round of the Clean School Bus Program, which I will discuss in a moment. Our order book also includes orders for 295 electric trucks, and our Lion Energy order book amounts to approximately $6 million for charging infrastructure and related services. We realize that the electric truck market is still in its early stage, but the recent unveiling of our Lion5 truck, the first Lion model with our own LionBattery, and the upcoming commercialization of our LionA tractor later this year should position Lion very well in the truck industry. Coming back to the EPA program. In addition to the $920 million awarded in round 1, the EPA recently announced that it is awarding $400 million in competitive grant funding for the replacement of existing school buses with clean and zero-emission school buses. For the second round, funding is expected to be up to $395,000 per vehicle, inclusive of charging infrastructure, and all applications must be submitted by August 22nd of this year. Besides the EPA program, various levels of governments continue to implement more stringent GHG emission targets, legislation, and subsidy programs to accelerate EV adoption, both for zero-emission school buses and medium and heavy-duty trucks. At the U.S. federal level, the EPA recently announced new GHG standards for heavy-duty vehicles. When finalized, these rules will lead to 50% of buses, including school buses, and 25% of long-haul tractor-trailers to be electric by 2032. At the state level, important laws and regulations are being adopted that will continue to accelerate the shift to the electrification of its transportation sector. For example, CARB recently adopted its Advanced Clean Fleet rule, which is expected to have an unprecedented impact on ZEV adoption in California. Under this new rule, all trucks performing drayage operations will need to register with CARB, starting next year, only zero-emission vehicles can be registered. Federal fleets and high priority fleets will either need to purchase only ZEVs starting in 2024, or alternatively, meet ZEV targets as a proportion of total fleet starting in 2025. In the case of box trucks and school buses, this proportion of ZEV is set to 10% of fleet in 2025, 25% in 2028, and growing to 100% by 2035. In combination with the Advanced Clean Truck regulation, CARB expects the ACF rule to result in over 500,000 medium and heavy duty zero emission vehicles in California in 2035, and close to 1.7 million by 2050. As seen in the past, we expect that many other states will follow CARB's leadership and adopt similar regulation. In addition to regulation, we continue to see great momentum in subsidies and incentive programs, with billions of dollars available across the U.S. and Canada to support fleet electrification. With our product lineup focused on urban range and our growing production capacity, we believe we are ideally positioned to benefit from all these programs, and will continue to closely monitor them on behalf of customers. Takes me to an update on the Joliet factory and the battery plant. During the first quarter, we focused on the ramp-up of electric school bus production in Joliet as we continued to install school bus working stations equipment with a targeted manufacturing capacity of 2,500 buses per year by the end of the year. This allowed us to continue to manufacture LionC units for customer deliveries. We should proceed with the official grand opening of our Joliet plant during the summer. For our battery plant, we did the grand opening and hosted analysts for an on-site meeting a few weeks ago. We installed additional equipment as we continue to ramp up the production of LionBattery packs with an objective of bringing our production capacity to 1.7 GWh on an annual basis by the end of the year. This will be enough to power approximately 5,000 of our vehicles in a mix of school buses and trucks. Certification of the first of our two battery pack models is expected in Q2 of this year, followed by a gradual ramp-up of production during the rest of the year. We will gradually integrate our Lion battery systems into our different vehicle models, starting with the LionC and LionD school buses and the Lion5 trucks. We currently have over 3,800 BMW battery packs in inventory to perform a smooth transition to our own batteries throughout the year. Now, a few words on our Saint-Jérôme plant. The operational improvements made in the prior years have allowed us to continue to increase our production cadence. No major CapEx is required to achieve our production capacity of 2,500 vehicles at scale, consisting of 1,000 school buses and 1,500 trucks. Let me now address our focus on profitability. In parallel to ramping up operations at our three plants, we are focused on our path to achieving profitability. The unit level economics are healthy, and the Lion model works well at scale. As we produce and sell more vehicles and expand on our vertical integration strategy, such as the Lion batteries at our own battery plant, we are confident that the Lion model should generate attractive margins. The CapEx investments to bring our total capacity to 5,000 vehicles, including batteries, will be completed by the end of this year, a very significant milestone for Lion. We have also put in place measures to contain cost at all levels of the company to minimize as much as possible the timeline to profitability. Our entire organization is aligned towards achieving this goal. Nicolas will now further discuss our financial performance for Q1. Nicolas. Thank you, Marc. I will start with the financial highlights of the first quarter. I will comment on Q1 CapEx and conclude with our liquidity position. During the quarter, we delivered 220 vehicles consisting of 207 buses and 13 trucks, which translated into revenue of $54.7 million compared to $22.6 million in Q1 2022, 142% year-over-year growth in revenue. 215 of the vehicles delivered in Q1 were delivered in Canada and five in the U.S. This was our sixth consecutive quarter of sequential growth in vehicle deliveries. We posted gross margin of negative 4%, a significant improvement relative to the negative 10% margin in Q4 of 2022. If we remove the impact of non-cash share-based compensation, SG&A amounted to $17.5 million in Q1 as compared to $12.6 million in the same period last year. The increase was mainly due to an increase in expenses as we expand our head office and general corporate capability and sales force in anticipation of the ramp-up of production capacity. Adjusted EBITDA was negative $14.5 million for Q1 as compared to negative $11.3 million for the same period last year. During the quarter, CapEx amounted to $23.1 million, including $6 million incurred for the Joliet plant and $14 million incurred for the Lion campus. As previously signaled, our 2023 CapEx for the Joliet plant and the Lion campus are expected to amount to $65 million, consisting of $45 million for the Lion campus and $20 million for the Joliet vehicle plant. We expect CapEx to drastically decrease next year as we expect to have, by year-end, a combined production capacity of 5,000 vehicles at our Canadian and U.S. vehicle plant and a production capacity of 1.7 GWhs at our battery plant, enough to power approximately 5,000 vehicles in a mix of school buses and trucks. Any future investments towards further capacity expansion will only take place when justified by the order book and, importantly, our liquidity profile. As a reminder, we expect that approximately 55% or approximately $25 million of the $45 million in capital expenditures to be incurred in 2023 for the Lion campus will be financed through the federal and provincial loans secured for such purpose. Addition to the tangible assets, which mostly consist in R&D, amounted to approximately $16.5 million as compared to $15 million last year. Let me now say a few words on our liquidity and capital resources. In Q1, gross proceeds for the exercise of the overallotment option for the December 2022 unit offering generated $7.5 million. We also completed a sale leaseback transaction for the battery plant building in Mirabel, raising gross proceeds of approximately $21 million. We raised $4.6 million under our ATM program. We drew $6.3 million on our government loans related to the Lion campus. As of the end of Q1, we had an immediate liquidity position of $57 million, consisting of a cash position of $36 million and $21 million availability on our ABL credit facility. We were also owed $10 million on the government loans for capital expenditures incurred up to March 31, 2023 on the Lion campus. As Marc mentioned, 209 purchase orders were obtained in connection with the EPA Clean School Bus Program, most directly through vouchers filed by Lion and to a lesser extent, through applications made by free agents which were converted into purchase orders of Lion. These purchase orders represent a total value of $105 million. For approximately a third of these orders, clients have requested an extension to the EPA, mainly due to challenges related to charging infrastructure and related construction work. As Marc mentioned, we are also working to obtain additional orders from awardees who have obtained extensions from the EPA. Upfront payments under the EPA program have already come in, with over $10 million having been received from the EPA since the end of the quarter. As applications in respect of other orders are processed by the EPA, we expect to also be able to receive other upfront payments from the EPA. Lastly, at the end of the quarter, capacity of approximately $90 million remained available for issuance under our ATM program. To conclude, I will reiterate that we will continue to closely monitor market conditions and our liquidity and capital requirements and resources. We'll also continue to explore and evaluate different financing opportunities with a view to raise additional capital and strengthen our financial position in the upcoming months. With that, I will pass it back to Marc for concluding remarks. Thanks, Nicolas. Before we open the line for questions, let me conclude by saying that we are pleased with our Q1 performance. We expect this gradual growth in orders, sales, and production to continue. We will keep building on this momentum and on our objective to achieve profitability. Thank you for your time this morning. Operator, we will now open the line for questions. I just want to ask you to limit to two the number of questions asked to allow other participants to ask their question. You can of course, go back in the queue if you have any follow-up questions. Thank you. If you'd like to ask a question, please press star followed by one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star followed by two. As a reminder, questions are limited to two questions only. If you still have a question in the interest of time, we ask you to kindly rejoin the queue. Our first question comes from the line of Chris Souther of B. Riley. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Yeah. hey, thanks for taking my questions here. maybe you could just kind of quantify how many extensions you think are out there for the first round of the EPA that are still kind of free agents that are looking for potential solutions. maybe just on the EPA strategy for the second round, you know, how you think the bundling of the bus and charging infrastructure will play out. Do you think pricing will become more of a factor here where customers will be looking to open up additional funds for charging infrastructure? Hey, Chris, Nick here, Hope as well. I'll take this one. In terms of the broader extensions as part of the EPA program, it's something we're in the process of trying to find out. We believe it could be a significant number that are still out there, free agents, but don't have all the facts right now. In our case, in the case of the clients that we work with, we're talking about a third of the orders or third of the clients that requested extension. Recall that in total, we're talking about close to 2,400 unit vouchers for electric buses that were awarded. It's something that we're working on right now. In terms of the second round, what I'd say is the second round is $395,000 of total vouchers for both the vehicle and the charging infrastructure. It's essentially the same amount, but it's not as prescribed, meaning in the first round, it was 375 for the button and 20 for the charging infrastructure. There's a little bit more flexibility in terms of allocating the amount. I would also say that it's a completely different program. In the first round, we were talking about a rebate, right, where it was essentially, well, a subsidy to purchase the vehicle. It was targeting a really broad audience. There were over 400 awardees as part of the program, and they were capped at each applicant was capped at 25 units max. In the second round, it's a competitive grant process. There's a pretty detailed scoring system in there, and there's both minimums and maximums. For school districts, larger school districts, we're talking about minimum of 15, maximum of 50 units. For the third-party applicants that have to aggregate at least four school boards, we're talking about a minimum of 25 and a maximum of 100. There's also a big focus on leveraging third-party funds as part of this. Overall, I should also specify that the EPA indicated that they expect to award 25 to 50 applications as part of this competitive grant process. It's a more complex application, but I'd say it's more aligned with what we've done in the past in terms of bidding. Got it. No, that's really helpful. Maybe on the, on the path to profitability, we saw some progress in gross margins in the quarter with some additional volumes. Can you walk through whether, you know, we should expect a cadence of fixed costs over the next couple quarters to come on as you ramp Mirabel and Joliet, or whether, you know, we can expect continued steady improvements there with some of the additional volumes? I'd say on that, look, we think the model works well at scale. It's something we've said in the past, continues certainly to be the case. There is a potential improvements related to the unit mix, as we deliver more units in US, as we have more of those price increases that come in in the deliveries. We think volume will help on the margin side of things. At the same time, I think you identified correctly, there can be some volatility related to the timing of the cost of the Joliet facility as well as the battery plant. It's as Marc mentioned, it's clearly a focus for us to continue to improve on the margin side of things. Okay. That'll help. Thank you. you. Thanks, guys. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Shlisky of D.A. Davidson. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Okay. Good morning, thanks for taking my question. First, I'll follow up on this question real quick about your profitability comments there, Nick. Maybe a better way I can ask it is just more immediately is how far do you think you are? How many quarters away do you think you are from being breakeven on a gross margin level? Maybe we could just like start there. Good morning, Mike. Well, we're, you know, profitability is really a key objective for all of us at Lion. The way to get there is, well, the first step is really a positive gross margin and then a positive EBITDA, and the ultimate goal is the free cash flow, right? Free cash flow positive. We feel that, as Nick was saying earlier, our model scales very well. One of the reason for that is because the models we are building are purpose-built for electric. With respect to volume, we don't need a very significant volume to achieve this profitability. This would be the... We spoke about the material margins in the past, and they are very healthy. Let's say that this model as we have right now works very well in Saint-Jérôme. Also the way we're ramping up in Joliet, this is going very well. I think we're very focused on school buses and getting to this first phase of 2,500 school buses of manufacturing capacity, we feel, you know, is pretty wise. We feel that right now the manufacturing capacity ramp-up is very well aligned with the ramping up that we're expecting also, you know, on the purchase order side. That's great. Perhaps my other question is also a follow-up on your comment there, Marc. I guess I'd like to know a little bit about the cadence of the ramp-up from here. It sounds like you've got increases in Q2, probably in Q3, Q4, you know, sequentially. I'm kind of curious, is there a quarter where there's a large step change in the production volumes? Are they because you're opening up more at Joliet, or you've got a large purchase order, you know, at some point, you know, this year? Just any sense as to how steep the ramp might be over the next couple of quarters would be appreciated. Thank you, Mike. We feel that it's gonna be gradual. This quarter was the sixth consecutive quarter of growth, and for us, it's really growing from 1 quarter to the other. That's the name of the game. We have a very strong foundation, and we will keep building like that. I don't believe in a switch that you're just turning on and off, and then you can increase, you know, by thousands of units. In my mind, this is totally unrealistic. You can expect, you know, this growth to keep going in Q2, and then into Q3, into Q4 as well. This is exactly what we're expecting, and this is very well aligned also with our customer request. We need to make sure, you know, delivering electric vehicles, Mike, is something that we need to plan ahead. You need to plan the delivery of the vehicle at the same time that you are planning the charging infrastructure installation as well. All of this is very well aligned with the Lion ecosystem that we have. Okay. I appreciate the color. I'll leave it there. Thank you. Thank you, Mike. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Rupert Merer of National Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Hi. Yeah, good morning, everyone. First, just to follow up on that last question. I think you had five deliveries in the U.S. in Q1. How many of those were produced in Joliet? Given that you plan to be at a capacity of 2,500 by the end of this year, is that a number that you'll physically have the capability to do by the end of this year? Hey, good morning, Rupert. With respect to the manufacturing capacity of 2,500 units, the CapEx by the end of this year, as you know, will have been fully invested. It's after that, it's the ramp-up of the labor that we need to do. When we're saying we have a manufacturing capacity of 2,500 units, we do have the equipment to manufacture 2,500 units. We will make sure that we align the labor with the forecasted delivery. We're not saying that we will be at that pace before the end of the year, but we will be ready to be at that pace if the order book is there and if obviously, you know, the customers are requesting those buses in this period of time as well. I think we need to be sure on to be aligned on this thing. Yeah. Rupert, I'll just add, we, you know, we still at modest volumes in Q1 as we're ramping up. We're not providing the, you know, the split, the exact split of the units, but it's still in ramp-up phase. As Marc mentioned, we expect it to continue to ramp up over the year. Okay, great. Can you remind us in your order book how many sales or orders are available for sale this year in Canada and the U.S.? Yeah. The, the order book, the composition, it goes all the way up to 2026. What we've said in our disclosure is that it's the bulk of, or the quasi totality of that is delivered from now to the end of 2025. Obviously, substantially all of the orders are related to some subsidy programs, some of which include the ZETF. In fact, a big portion includes the ZETF, and some of these applications are still pending approval. You know, we're working to get those approvals, but I don't have a specific breakdown to give you for this year, Rupert. Okay, great. I guess I'd better leave it there. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Craig Irwin of Roth MKM. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Good morning, thank you for taking my questions. I wanted to see if we could maybe dive into gross margins a little bit more from a qualitative perspective. When we look at the big components in gross margins, materials, labor, and overhead, can you comment whether or not you're still seeing cost escalation on materials, if you're getting more efficiency on your purchases, if, you know, that's something that's generally stabilized and materials content per bus, is possible or bus and truck is possibly coming down the way one would expect with your volumes? On the labor, can you comment about the number of hours per bus, assemble a bus and your proportionate labor versus where you would be, you know, next date, you obviously hired ahead to just rotate a ramp that we expect to go on for a couple of years, and to really, you know, train the workforce ideally. If you could, if you could talk maybe the man-hour approximately, that would be helpful. The overhead, if we were to look at the overhead for just the Saint-Jérôme facility, you know, would it be fair to assume that those buses are pretty profitably with nice margin? You know, do we fully, does the P&L yet reflect the overhead we'll be carrying for both the Mirabel and Joliet facilities in the future? Yeah. Hey Craig, Nick here. Thanks for the question. Let me just tackle qualitatively, those items. In terms of material, I'd say it's a mix in terms of cost pressure. We're still seeing some inflationary pressure, but at the same time, we're starting not only to see some of that ease, but we're starting to see. We have a good eyesight on the benefits of a cost out program that we've been talking about for a while. I'd say there's some good opportunities for us to bring the cost down, and it's something that we need to achieve and we're working at through the quarters. It's becoming more and more tangible. The dialogue with suppliers, whereas it was about containing costs only or containing cost increases in the past, it's become more and more about, you know, going back to previous prices and reducing the cost in some instances. In some more sort of technical or technological items, we're eyeing out a more long-term, you know, couple of years type thing, significant cost out opportunity, but that will take some time. I'd say overall on the material, certainly there's been a change in the dialogue and in the relationships where we see some important opportunities to bring costs down in a number of places. There's certainly room there. In terms of labor, what I'd say is right now our workforce is not where we want it to be in terms of productivity at the hours per vehicle. One of the principal reasons for that is all the development activities that we have and the new platforms that we're launching and the new production lines that we're ramping up. Certainly it's not as important cost-wise as is the bill of material, but there are some opportunities there. We expect that this will improve really once we've gradually and once we've launched the new platforms that we're bringing to market this year. Finally on the overhead, look that we've... It, it's probably the biggest issue in terms of weighing on gross margins, fixed overhead or overhead, cost absorption. I would say that we have a cost base today that is reflective of much more than just our Saint-Jérôme plant. We'll absorb that over more volume as we scale up both Saint-Jérôme and the Joliet plant. There's likely to be some increases in the overhead as we ramp up Joliet, but not anywhere close to proportional to volume. Meaning we already incur those costs in great proportion in Saint-Jérôme to manage the two operations or the two production plants, excuse me. Excellent. Thank you for that. My next question is really the velocity of sales into the North American market. You've done an excellent job capturing vouchers, supporting your customers in the school districts out there to procure vouchers from the EPA programs. Can you really talk about the tempo of potential deliveries into the North American market? Should we expect maybe back-end loaded for the vouchers to really see those deliveries closer to sort of, you know, mid-2024? Is it possible that we see, you know, a rapid uptick on those deliveries? Is that facilitated by some of the heavy pricing we've seen from other OEMs in the market? Look, in terms of the EPA units, which is I think what you were referring to, and correct me if that's not the case, but, the deliveries can go all the way to October 2024. I wanna make it very clear that our objective is to deliver those units as soon as clients are ready to take them, and we think we can deliver them well before that. In general, clients are looking to get those units. You know, the first phase of the EPA was about getting purchase orders, and we're still working at that. As I mentioned, I think there's an opportunity to do more. Really what's gonna be most important is gonna be the cadence of deliveries and the quality of the product that's delivered. It's our objective to do much sooner than 2024. At the same time, you know, we use the word gradual quite a lot and expect that the cadence of those deliveries will be gradual. We do... I mean, we had very few units delivered on the U.S. The purchase order book has proportionately become more U.S. driven than it was in the past few quarters, and it's our intention for that mix to change over time over the coming quarters. Hey, Craig, was your question only on school buses, or were you alluding to trucks as well? It would be useful to know on trucks, but on school bus that's, you know, that's what everybody's watching right now. My next question is gonna be on trucks, so. Okay. Is there- Craig, I think there was another part to your question on pricing. Look, I mean, Yeah ... I'd say we think we could be very competitive when we need to. It'll apply, it can apply well to that second round of the EPA, which talks about leveraging sort of third party funding. Essentially, we feel the EPA is asking for groups to do more with less, and we can do well. We've done competitively quite well in the Canadian market as well. It probably hasn't been as much of a factor in the first round, though, yeah. We expect it to become an increasing focus, and we think we're well prepared for that. Thank you. If I could ask the truck question that I have. You're now. Please go ahead. both the Lion6 and the Lion8 are both shipping and in customers' hands. You know, that's usually a pretty good thing for the pipeline, the potential orders. And, you know, real-world experience tends to, you know, change the quality of those customer interactions. Could you maybe give us some color around that? Then, you know, IRA, it seems that Class 4 could have outsized stimulus funding. Let's say subsidies is a less attractive word. But Class 4 is not in your plan. You've got both Class 5 and Class 8 planned for this year. Could you talk about flexibility to address this substantial support for Class 4 out there, if it's something you would consider? Thank you for taking the question. No, thank you, Craig. Class 4 is not in our plan for now, Craig. We feel that Class 5, which is a medium duty and where we have many options for the customers, will cover a lot of the market. For most of those operators, what really matters is that they can drive those trucks without, you know, the special driver's license, and they can do a lot, you know, with this Class 5, and it's also the payload that matters. You can have a lot of payload with this Class 5. We've decided to go with the Class 5 for now. Class 4, I mean, you're getting very close to the market of, you know, the lighter truck and where it's really crowded right now, and this is a market that we've decided to stay away from. We feel that the medium duty and heavy duty is really a market where there's a lot of potential and very few OEMs that are proposing purpose-built trucks right now. We're one of the only OEMs out there that are proposing to our customers purpose-built electric trucks. Huge market on Class 5. You're absolutely right. We delivered Class 6 and Class 8, and for many of those operators, they are looking at electrifying the whole fleet or most of the fleet. It's almost, let's say, a pilot for them right now. You know, this is going well. I mean, discussions with the truck operators, I mean, we really see an increased interest. Craig, you probably saw as well the ACF that we were talking about earlier. We feel this is a game changer. New regulation in California, when we're looking at the past, like with the ACT, a lot of states and a lot of Canadian provinces will follow what California is doing. With the ACF, it's a major game game changer, where the starting in 2024, so it's really tomorrow, I mean, it's early next year, the operators will have to start buying electric electric trucks in California. We were expecting this to happen, and this is finally happening. We feel this is a real game changer. When you're looking at the product lineup we have, the Class 5 that we are we unveiled last week and the Class 8 tractor that we will be unveiling by the end of the year as well with the Class 6 and the Class 8 straight body as well, we have a full lineup of products for those operators, and we feel it's very promising. Thank you. If I could just squeeze one in, on the truck. Can you remind us the approximate number of customers that are operating your Lion6 or Lion8 trucks and the total size of the fleet that's rolling right now? Yeah. We have about 125 to 160 trucks out there with clients. I mean, the bulk of clients who have purchased less than 10 units. Thank you very much. Well, congratulations on the progress here. I'll back in the queue. Thank you, Craig. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Tamy Chen of BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Great. Thank you. Good morning. First question I had is related to the Clean School Bus Program. Of the 298 purchase orders, about a third are requesting some delays with the EPA. Do you know, like, what length of delays we're talking out here? Do you know what amount they're requesting for? Yeah. The when we say a third of clients, I'm really referring to the number of units, Tamy Chen. The delays go all the way to the latest the EPA allowed is August fifteenth. Some of the clients have, I mean, they don't all go to August fifteenth. Those delays were largely related to having the appropriate contracts for the installation of charging infrastructure. So it's just a matter of figuring that out. I'd say the extensions go anywhere from sort of end of May to all the way to August. Yeah. Got it. Okay. My last question is, apologies if I missed this earlier, were any of the bus deliveries in this quarter from, what you've been awarded so far from the first round? Can you talk a little bit about how you expect your bus deliveries to unfold over the rest of this year as it relates particular to, the Clean School Bus Program? Thank you. Yeah, really just a very small number of units from the EPA program. It hasn't, you know, kicked in materially. What you may have heard me answer before around the timing of the program, the program allows for delivery and all other requirements around the scrapping or selling a diesel bus and whatnot to be done by October of 2024. We're working with clients to time those deliveries, but our objective is to deliver faster than the deadline. I mean, we, as I mentioned in the one of the prior questions, the first phase of this was about getting the purchase orders. The second phase about timely deliveries of quality vehicles. At the same time, you know, client has to be ready to take on the vehicle, and we want this to be a positive experience. The bottom line is, we're, you know, we're going to look to do these deliveries as rapidly as possible. Got it. Okay. Thank you. Thank you, Tamy. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Dan Levy of Barclays. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thank you. Apologies if I missed this earlier. I jumped on late. Just wanted to ask on the CapEx side. I think recently the Canadian government budget is allowing for some additional tax credits for clean tech manufacturing, which would be, you know, a pretty nice offset on the CapEx piece. Maybe you can just talk about if there's any further clarity here and what offsets you might have on CapEx. Yeah. hey, Dan. yes, so the in the federal budget, there's discussion of a, an investment tax credit, I believe of 30% for investments related to EV manufacturing, battery manufacturing. The version that we've seen, it refers to investments that take place after, January 1, 2024. It's something as you would imagine, we're very much looking into. at the very least, it could, you know, it could be an option for future expansions. At the same time, one thing we've made very clear this morning is that post our 2023 CapEx plan, our intention is to drastically reduce CapEx, and we don't plan to build capacity expansions until number one, it's justified by the order book, and number two, importantly, that it's, it works with our liquidity situation. It's something we're looking into right now. We would want this to apply, of course, to our current investments, but they're not, it's not a program that we're counting on just yet given the timing restrictions I just talked about. Got it. Thank you. Again, apologies if you mentioned it earlier, but if you could just address within the order book, you know, obviously, buses are up, but trucks are down. Maybe you could just talk about some of the movements within the order book on the truck side. Yeah. Good morning. Good morning, Dan. Yeah, it's slower than expected to be honest. At the same time, you know, what we're seeing right now is very exciting. We have trucks out there. We have customers and we do have a full lineup of, you know, purpose-built trucks. With the unveiling last week of the Lion5, we see increased interest. We, we feel, you know, it's gonna be exactly the same thing with the LionA tractor as well. A lot of the market is expecting the LionA tractor truck to be launched before the end of the year. We feel, you know, the timing is finally working for us right now. If you remember how it worked, you know, on the school bus side, it took about, you know, 5, 6 years to really take off. With the supply chain crisis and the COVID, you know, and all this crisis within the last few years, we feel that, you know, this period is starting now. We think this is exciting. I was referring to the ACF earlier. As I was telling Craig, I mean, this is really a game changer in our opinion. There's some subsidies out there. There's some subsidies on the U.S. side. There's a lot of subsidies on the Canadian side. Now we're seeing this new regulation taking off as well. This is great. This is really gonna help us. I mean, only in California where CARB is saying that the ACF rule, they are expecting to have over 500,000 ZEVs on the road just in California by 2035 and over 1.7 million ZEVs by 2050. Now the OEMs don't have any choice than, you know, offering a ZEV in California. A ZEV is really, it's gonna be electric or it's hydrogen. With respect to electric, with the purpose-built full lineup of trucks that we have right now, we feel we're very well positioned to capture some of this market. Great. If I could just get a, squeeze a follow-up, on that just to clarify, what is the typical timing of an order cycle from a fleet? Meaning, you know, we've seen, ACF, pass and, you know, just how long does it typically take for fleets to then flow in orders and for those orders to, eventually convert to, production? It's always then, it's always the first order that takes a lot of time and especially on the truck side. I mean, the fleet operators we're talking to, a lot of them, they are very large fleets. Well, it takes a lot of planning to electrify your fleet. It's really a teamwork between the operator and the OEM to make sure that while the right specs are on the vehicles, but also the right charging infrastructure are being selected and they are being installed in a timely manner as well. It takes some time, I mean, to do a good job. You probably remember, I mean, our way of thinking it's really, I mean, for us to adapt to the operator and not the other way around. The first order is takes always, you know, a lot longer. That's one of the reason you see so many repeat orders on the school bus side. That's the reason why, you know, the order book is growing very well also. We expect the same thing to happen on the truck side, and we are working on the initial order for a lot of those truck operators as we speak right now. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Michael Kypreos of Desjardins Capital. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Good morning, and thank you for taking my question. On the supply chain issues, your press release mentioned that you still had some continued issues. Maybe just an update versus last quarter, what sections have improved, what has gotten more difficult, and any updates on that front? Thank you for everything. Yeah. Good morning, Michael. Thank you. Yeah, still, you know, supply chain challenges. I mean, we're not done with those challenges at this point. It's a lot better than it was in the past. We're still expecting to have those supply chain issues for the rest of the year. You probably remember the way we've been able to deal with this. One thing we've done, I think very well, is the redundancy of suppliers. We've been doing this because of the supply chain crisis, but we've also been doing that because of our expansion into the United States. Right now we have a lot of suppliers on both sides of the border, and for most of the components, we have at least two suppliers and sometimes more than two suppliers as well. We feel that, you know, this will still be a challenge for the remaining of the year, but it's becoming less and less of an issue. Perfect. That helps a lot. Maybe just on the liquidity front, your cash did drop in the quarter, and if the, if the timing on the upfront payments for the EPA lasts until August and maybe some other delays from Canadian stimulus, what would you say would be your pecking order of priorities in terms of liquidity? What would you prefer in terms of maybe issuing shares in the ATM or the other options that you have available? Thank you very much. Look, I'd say just first on the liquidity, Michael, we finished at $67 million at the end of the quarter. That was $36 million of cash and $21 million available on the credit facility. We were owed $10 million on the government loans for the campus as at the end of the quarter, and have since collected half of that. We received $10 million in EPA payments. We've also collected $7 million as part of an R&D subsidy program. Certainly the EPA orders are expected to help. It's $105 million in value in total. Recall that about a third for a third of those, the clients have re-requested extensions that can go all the way to August. We expect to continue to receive some of those payments. You asked about specific timing. The EPA talked, and they stated in the program as an objective to fund 60 days after they process the order. It usually takes a little bit of time to get these programs going, so we're pretty happy that it has started already. In terms of additional sources, we have, as you mentioned, the CAD 100 million in government loans, which we expect to fund about $25 million of our Lion Campus this year. We have about $90 million remaining on our ATM program. I said that during the prepared remarks. We will continue to monitor market conditions, our liquidity, our capital requirements. We'll evaluate different financing opportunities with a view to raise some capital and strengthen the financial position in the upcoming months. That said, I can't give you a precise answer on timing and instrument. I will say we feel we have a significant runway. You know, we'll be mindful of dilution, we'll be mindful of flexibility, but I can't be more precise than that at this stage. There's gonna be a lot of varying factors. Thank you very much for the call. It's much appreciated. Thank you, Michael. Thank you. As there are no additional questions waiting at this time, I'll hand the conference back over to Ms. Isabelle Adjahi for closing remarks. Well, thank you.
Loading workspace