Good day, everyone. Welcome to the Lumentum Holdings third quarter fiscal year 2021 earnings call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing star then zero. Please also note today's event is being recorded. At this time, I'd like to turn the conference over to Jim Fanucchi of Darrow Associates. Sir, please go ahead. Thank you, operator. Welcome to Lumentum's third quarter fiscal year 2021 earnings call. This is Jim Fanucchi from Darrow Associates, assisting Lumentum with its investor relations. Joining the call today from the company's management team, we have Alan Lowe, President and Chief Executive Officer, Wajid Ali, Chief Financial Officer, and Chris Coldren, Senior Vice President of Strategy and Corporate Development. Today's call will include forward-looking statements, including statements regarding the markets in which we operate and our position in such markets, the impact of COVID-19 and responsive actions thereto on our business and continuing uncertainty in this regard, trends and expectations for our products and technology, our markets, market opportunity and customers, and our expected financial performance, including our guidance as well as statements regarding our future revenues, our financial model, and our margin targets. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our current expectations, particularly the risk factors described in our SEC filings, including the company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended April 3rd, 2021, which the company expects to file later today. The forward-looking statements provided during this call are based on Lumentum's reasonable beliefs and expectations as of today. Lumentum undertakes no obligation to update these statements except as required by applicable law. Please also note, unless otherwise stated, all results and projections discussed in this call are non-GAAP. Non-GAAP financials are not to be considered as a substitute for or superior to financials prepared in accordance with GAAP. Lumentum's press release with the third quarter fiscal 2021 results and accompanying supplemental slides are available on its website at www.lumentum.com under the Investors section and includes additional details about our non-GAAP financial measures and a reconciliation between our historical GAAP and non-GAAP results. I will turn the call over to Alan for his comments. Thank you, Jim. Good morning, everyone. I want to first say our thoughts and prayers are with everyone affected by the continuing COVID-19 pandemic. While vaccinations and case rates are declining in the U.S. and a few other countries, in many places around the world, the situation is not good. What is happening in India is absolutely heartbreaking. Again, our thoughts are with everyone affected. Turning to our business. Our third quarter results highlight a product portfolio increasingly rich in new and differentiated products, and aligned with favorable long-term, multi-year market trends. Revenue from key new product lines that position us well for long-term growth were each up by double-digit% year-over-year. These include indium phosphide-based coherent components and modules, next generation contentionless Mx N ROADMs, high speed EMLs, and 3D sensing lasers. Non-GAAP gross margin expanded by 440 basis points year-on-year, driven by continuous improvements in our operations and product mix. The accelerating transition to digital and virtual approaches in all aspects of work and life is driving staggering amounts of data in the world's networks and cloud data centers. The proliferation of 5G wireless will remove bandwidth bottlenecks at the edge of the network and drive even more bandwidth in the core networks and cloud data centers. The computer and machine vision revolutions are in their early days, and we expect 3D sensing and LiDAR capabilities will expand to many more applications in multiple markets. These include augmented and virtual reality, 3D machine vision for industrial applications, frictionless and contactless biometric security and access control, and automotive and delivery vehicle applications. Laser-based material processing is critical to the manufacturing of the devices that enable the digital transformation and transition to 5G wireless and electric vehicle and energy storage. These multi-year trends, combined with our product and technology leadership positions, bode well for us over the long term. Recent discussions with market-leading customers gives me optimism. Customers have communicated that they are seeing growing end market demand for their next generation solutions, where we have a wide range of design wins with highly differentiated products. Now it is about translating this growing end market demand into shipments and revenue. On this point, like others, we are seeing headwinds that may moderate near-term market growth in telecom and 5G-related components for the remainder of this calendar year. We believe the telecom and 5G components market will re-accelerate midway through our fiscal year 2022. These views are driven by the combination of a tight supply of critical semiconductors that we and our customers depend on, customer inventory build in anticipation of strong end market demand, and potential delays in deployments in certain geographies more impacted by COVID-19. We expect the lasers market recovery to continue and our business to return to pre-pandemic levels by the middle of fiscal 2022. In 3D sensing, we believe the net impact of certain customer design decisions will reduce the overall global market for 3D sensing lasers in fiscal 2022 by approximately 20%-25%. We expect laser-based sensing to expand to more applications, customers, and markets in fiscal 2022 and 2023, setting the stage for a re-acceleration of market growth in fiscal 2023. Our product roadmaps include new designs for the future, where we integrate additional functionality to help customers further reduce size and their cost of incorporating 3D sensing capabilities, while allowing us to capture more dollar content over time. At this time, putting these market trends, supply constraints, and customer forecasts together, we expect our revenue for the first half of fiscal 2022 to be down approximately 5% relative to the first half of fiscal 2021. These near-term external market headwinds do not diminish my optimism around our long-term, multi-year market outlook, our product portfolio and design wins, and the positive changes in our business model and the industry over the past several years. I believe the future continues to be very bright at Lumentum. Turning to capital allocation. We are disappointed the Coherent transaction didn't turn out as we had initially hoped. We continue to believe strategic M&A will be a value creator for Lumentum over the long run. We will be thoughtful in our approach and timing. That said, we believe very strongly in our organic opportunities for value creation. From a capital allocation standpoint, after analyzing alternatives, we believe investing in our own stock is currently our best opportunity. As such, Lumentum's Board of Directors has authorized a share buyback program for up to $700 million over the next two years. Now on to more details about our third quarter. Within telecom and datacom, revenue from indium phosphide-based coherent components and modules was up 28% year-on-year after adjusting for the extra week of the recent third quarter. We had strong ROADM revenue with record contention-less Mx N sales. These products are increasing in our revenue mix due to their incorporation in our customers' latest systems, which they are just starting to ramp. The average selling price of these advanced ROADMs are significantly higher than the lower port count devices. This will help us accelerate revenue growth as new network deployments increase over the coming several years. In China, we are already designed into every major network equipment manufacturer, or NEM, with our Mx N or high port count ROADMs. On our last call, we highlighted production shipments of Mx N ROADMs to our largest Western NEM customer. In the third quarter, we started production shipments to our next largest NEM customer in the West. We are designed in or in final qualification stages with many other customers with our latest advanced ROADMs. Revenue from EML chips was up more than 40% year-on-year, again, adjusting for the extra week in the recent third quarter. These products serve the cloud data center market, which is increasingly transitioning to 200 and 400 gig speeds. At these higher speeds, our products are highly differentiated. We expect this differentiation will drive market share gains with non-vertically integrated and vertically integrated transceiver suppliers. We expect our growth will accelerate as cloud operators continue their transitions to higher speeds. Underscoring this, during the third quarter, we received $90 million of orders for EMLs, primarily from web scale cloud operators and customers serving them, seeking to secure our production output. This backlog will be delivered over multiple quarters as we are capacity constrained on EMLs. Our previously highlighted production capacity expansion is tracking well and will come online later this calendar year for significant increased output starting in the second half of fiscal 2022. Due to continued delays in 5G front haul deployments in China, our third quarter DML revenue was significantly below year-ago levels, and fourth quarter DML sales are expected to be down by more than $20 million year-on-year. At this time, we expect 5G front haul deployments could resume this summer. This timing would drive increased demand for our products towards the middle of fiscal 2022 once customers ramp up and burn through existing inventory. Looking to the fourth quarter, we expect telecom and datacom revenue to be up quarter-on-quarter. Third quarter industrial and consumer revenue was up year-on-year due to increased dollar content and higher volumes, and declined quarter-on-quarter as expected due to seasonality. In the fourth quarter, we expect industrial and consumer to be down sequentially due to normal 3D sensing seasonality, but up by double digits percentage year-on-year. Additionally, we have begun mass production of new laser chip designs for upcoming major customer new products. We recently had an important Android customer launch a mobile phone with time-of-flight 3D sensing camera capabilities enabled by our lasers. This is a notable design win, as this customer is a large and leading supplier of camera components, and their features frequently proliferate to much higher volume Android manufacturers. During the third quarter, we announced industry-leading advancements in VCSEL technology that position us well for future applications in the industrial and automotive markets. For example, we announced high power, high efficiency VCSEL arrays leveraging industry-leading five and six-junction design. These multi-junction arrays are of particular interest to the automotive and LiDAR markets. They have strong traction in solutions for autonomous vehicles, including in major retailers who are looking to deploy fleets of autonomous delivery vehicles. We continue to receive design-ins and initial production orders from other auto LiDAR and access control customers. Turning to commercial lasers, in the third quarter, we had a significant increase in kilowatt fiber laser sales after four quarters of decline. Historically, during market downturns, macro material processing was amongst the slowest segment to recover. We are now cautiously optimistic that we have seen the worst of the impact of COVID-19 in this segment. We expect fourth quarter lasers revenue to be up quarter-on-quarter. Throughout my remarks, I've highlighted that our markets are driven by strong long-term trends, and that we have invested heavily in differentiated new products, technologies, and customer programs. With our latest products, we have secured key design wins and are on track for more with market-leading customers. Our product mix is becoming richer in these new products as customers are starting to ramp shipments of their next generation solutions. We are seeing some nearer-term external factors that will moderate industry growth for the next few quarters, but these don't diminish our long-term market outlook. Before handing it over to Wajid to review the numbers, I want to once again thank and acknowledge all of our employees around the world for their hard work and contributions. Our employees are absolutely the company's greatest asset. I would also like to thank our customers, suppliers, and shareholders for their continued support and partnership during these challenging times. With that, I'll hand it over to Wajid. Thank you, Alan. Good morning, everyone. Turning to the third quarter's numbers. Net revenue for the third quarter was $419.5 million, which was down 12% sequentially and up 4% year-on-year. Out of an abundance of caution, we deferred $14.8 million of revenue due to delays in 5G front-haul deployments in China. However, despite the lower revenue and due to the strength of our financial model, we achieved approximately 50% non-GAAP gross margin and strong non-GAAP operating margin and EPS, which both were within our guidance ranges. GAAP gross margin for the third quarter was 44.1%, GAAP operating margin was 63.6%, and GAAP diluted net income per share was $2.85. GAAP results include the impact of the $217.6 million we received in connection with the termination of the Coherent transaction. Third quarter non-GAAP gross margin was 49.9%, which was down 350 basis points sequentially as expected, but up 440 basis points year-on-year due to our improving model with a better mix of products and lower relative manufacturing costs. The sequential decline relates to the seasonal change in product mix and volumes, while the year-on-year growth was driven by improved gross margins in the optical communications segment. Third quarter non-GAAP operating margin at 27.9% decreased 760 basis points sequentially, but increased 290 basis points year-on-year. The sequential decline was driven by the expected gross margin decline and increase in operating expenses quarter-on-quarter. The year-on-year increase was driven by the gross margin improvement year-on-year. Third quarter non-GAAP operating expenses totaled $92.1 million, or 22% of revenue. SG&A expense was $40.8 million, R&D expense was $51.3 million. The sequential increase in operating expenses was primarily driven by the extra week of the 14-week quarter and the annual reset of benefits rates and payroll tax that occurs at the beginning of the calendar year. Third quarter non-GAAP net income was $110.6 million. This includes half a million of net interest expense and $6 million of tax expense. Other income and expense was a net expense of $0.5 million, as interest income declined to levels lower than our expense due to lower interest rates on our cash and short-term investments. Non-GAAP diluted net income per share was $1.40 based on a fully diluted share count of 79.2 million. On the balance sheet, we ended the quarter with approximately $2.1 billion in cash and short-term investments, up $354 million quarter-on-quarter, including the $218 million Coherent transaction termination fee paid to us. We have $1.5 billion in aggregate principal convertible notes and no term debt. As Alan mentioned, Lumentum's board of directors has authorized a share buyback program of up to $700 million over the next two years. Over the past 12 months, our cash balance has increased by more than $600 million, and we are confident in our future long-term outlook. Given relative valuations in the industry, we believe this is a good use of our growing cash. Now turning to segment details. Third quarter optical communication segment revenue at $387.9 million decreased 14% sequentially due to seasonally lower revenues in telecom and datacom, and industrial and consumer, and the deferred 5G-related revenue I discussed earlier. Optical communication segment revenue was up 8% year-on-year due to the extra week in the quarter and higher industrial and consumer revenues due to the increased dollar content and adoption of 3D sensing in consumer electronic devices. Optical communication segment gross margin at 50.1% decreased 370 basis points sequentially, primarily due to lower industrial and consumer in the revenue mix, but increased 510 basis points year-on-year due to a more favorable revenue mix with newer and more profitable products and the benefits from operational improvements. Our lasers segment revenue at $31.6 million increased 6% sequentially due to the ongoing recovery from the impact of COVID-19, but is 27% down year-on-year as the recovery isn't complete. Third quarter lasers gross margin was down 30 basis points sequentially at 47.2% and down 250 basis points year-on-year due to significantly lower revenue levels. Now on to our guidance for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021, which is on a non-GAAP basis and is based on our assumptions as of today. We expect net revenue for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2021 to be in the range of $360 million-$400 million. Despite industry headwinds, this revenue guidance is consistent with our historical seasonality when normalizing for the revenue we deferred and the recent 14-week quarter. I'd note, over the past four years, the mean seasonal revenue decline from the third to fourth fiscal quarter has been about 7%. Our revenue projection assumes telecom and datacom increasing quarter-on-quarter, industrial and consumer declining due to normal seasonality, and commercial lasers increasing quarter-on-quarter, driven by further market recovery from COVID-19. Based on this, we project fourth quarter operating margin to be in the range of 22.5%-25% and diluted net income per share to be in the range of $0.92-$1.14. These projections also assume an approximate share count of 79 million, an estimated other expense of $1 million, and an estimated tax expense of $9 million. With that, I'll turn the call back to Jim to start the Q&A session. Jim? Thank you, Wajid. Before we start the question and answer session, I would like to ask everyone to keep to one question and one follow-up. This should help us get to everyone before the end of our allotted time. Operator, let's begin the question and answer session. We will now begin the question and answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. If you're using a speaker phone, please pick up your handset before pressing keys. At anytime your question has been addressed, and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time we'll pause momentarily to assemble our roster. Our first question comes from Samik Chatterjee of JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Hi, this is Joseph Cardoso on for Samik Chatterjee. Thanks for the question. My first one here, just wanted to touch on the first half guide you provided for fiscal 2022, starting with telecom and datacom. You're calling for moderate growth before re-accelerating in the second half of the year. Just wondering if you can parcel out the details there a bit. Where are you expecting to see the greatest strength? Where are you expecting to see the greatest weakness? How much is supply related? In terms of the recovery into the second half, can you kind of rank order the drivers that's giving you confidence that we see that recovery in the second half? Thank you. Sure. I'd say first half, going through the different product areas. As we said, Q4, we see telecom and datacom growth in Q4. We expect telecom to continue to grow in the first half, but moderately. From the exit rate of Q4. Datacom is going to continue to be hampered from our perspective and expectations around 5G rollout in China. One of the reasons we had that revenue deferral in the third quarter is the inventory in the various stages of deployment is moving very slowly. We don't expect that to pick up, as we said, the DML year-on-year reduction in Q4 is about $20 million. We expect that to continue to be a drag on our Datacom business. Offsetting that is the increased capacity we're putting in place on EMLs, we should see modest increases in EMLs, overall Datacom will be down in the first half. Commercial lasers is continuing to see a recovery from the pandemic. As we said, we expect that we will, by the middle of our fiscal year, be back to pre-pandemic levels. We'll see moderate growth in lasers. As we said also, our expectation given the 3D sensing market being smaller by 20% to 25%, mainly due to design decisions that some of our customers have made around smaller chips, and smaller chips lead to smaller average content per device. That's probably the bigger drag on the first half expectations. As far as second half and why we're confident that we'll see a rebound, I think if you look across our product portfolio, our design wins are phenomenal. Our team has done a fabulous job on our high port count and contention-less ROADMs. Those are designed in, and we talked about new designs in the West. From our perspective, we are very much poised for a rebound. That might happen before the end of the calendar year, but our expectations are that this is modest, and then in the second half of the fiscal year, that picks up. Also in the second half of the year, our capacity will be coming online for our EMLs, and that is going quite well. We talked about that two or three quarters ago. That's in motion, and we expect that our EMLs, due to our highly differentiated products, and the orders that we talked about in Q3, we expect to capture major market share on our EML business on the 200 and 400 gig products. Again, continued growth in lasers. The 3D sensing is again, a market issue that I think we'll all see on that one. The next question comes from Rod Hall with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi, guys. Thanks for the question. I guess my first question is back to the 3D sensing. I think it had been pretty well telegraphed that chip size is going to go down. I had also been assuming that you guys would have higher share as a result of the redesign. I just wonder if, Alan, could you comment on your share position in H1 and how you see that going? I've got a follow-up. Sure, Rod. Thanks for the question. We're highly confident of our ability to satisfy our customer. For the last three and a half years, we've been the partner of choice. We continue to execute, deliver almost a billion units of 3D sensing. I think from our perspective, we're the design lead. We're doing very well with our market share. We've been saying for two and a half years that our customer needs security of supply and that we would see a shift, and we saw that last year. I don't want to make expectations that we're going to go back to the kinds of share that we had over the last three years because that was uncomfortable for our customer and for us, quite frankly. I think having two suppliers in our leading customer is a good thing and one that gives us a comparison of how well we perform compared to our competitor. I think we're continuing to perform very well from a quality delivery cost perspective. Our expectations are that we're going to continue to have a solid share, especially at the front end of product launches. Okay. Great. For my follow-up, I just wanted to check on, I know that there's additional ROADM capacity planned for the summer. Just wanted to check that's still on track, that you guys are going to expand that capacity. I guess now, well, maybe you could comment on what you think that means for ROADM revenue trajectory post that. Are you still expecting to be short? It sounds like probably not given what's going on in the market, but I'd just be curious on the supply versus demand balances as you bring that capacity online and whether it's still on track. Yeah. We have added ROADM capacity mostly on the high end for the Mx N as well as our very high port count ROADMs. As our Western customers have added our Mx N to their mainstream product portfolio, we are not going to be short from a capacity standpoint. Because we're the sole source, we cannot let them down, and from that perspective, we're adding capacity in anticipation of them continuing to grow that business in the first half of our fiscal year, but really ramping it dramatically in the second half. That's on track. I'd say the other thing that's causing some angst is the semiconductor shortages. I have been a king expediter of semiconductors more than I'd like to be. That is also putting some pressure on our ability to meet our customer demand on the high end. The next question comes from Alex Henderson with Needham. Please go ahead. Thank you very much. You made a couple of comments around 3D sensing that I just wanted to get some clarification on. Clearly there's been some share shift going on. There's a reduction in your share and an increase in your competitor's share. Your comment that you expect to have solid share is not very definitive in terms of whether you think that rate of change in share has been altered. Can you talk about whether you think you've gotten to a point where share has stabilized, or do you expect to continue to have share erosion? How should we think about share trajectory as opposed to whether it's just simply solid? Solid is not very descriptive. All right, Alex. I think our track record speaks for itself. As new products have been announced, we are the dependable supplier that our customer counts on. If you want to have a different word for solid, that's how I describe it. My perspective is that the share equilibrium that has been reached in the last quarter is probably where we're going to end up. I think, over the long term, now, every quarter is going to be different based on new products and the models that get built and where we are versus our competitor. I think overall, our numbers speak for itself. I think if you talk to our competitor, do the comparison and see where we are. We're pretty transparent with our 3D sensing numbers in our press release and in our earnings. The conclusion is that your share has stabilized relative to where it has been in the most recent couple of quarters. Is that a fair statement of what you just said? I think so. From my perspective, I'm extremely paranoid about it all the time, that keeps us on our toes, make sure that we're attentive and responsive to our customers' needs. We don't want to give them any reason or excuse to move any more share than they already have. I think they're comfortable with it. I'm comfortable with it, and I think from that perspective, we're just continuing to work on next generation and next-next generation for our customer to make sure we're there for them. The next question comes from Simon Leopold with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Thank you for taking the question. I want to ask the sort of more complex one first and second, easy. On this 3D sensing market decline that you've talked about, there's obviously two key dimensions. One is volume and the other is ASP. I appreciate you can't be specific on the values, but could you help us get a better understanding of how we should think about what's going on with ASPs with the smaller chip other than the fact that they're less? Simon, I'd say that, just like any semiconductor, the cost of that device scales with both chip size as well as yield. Our customer's expectation is that ASP scales with chip size, and we're working on yield. I think we've done a great job, and our team's done a great job in getting to yields that I think our competitor and our customer never thought we could get to. I think from that perspective, you can imagine that the discussions with our customers around, hey, the chip is X% smaller in size, and therefore it should be X% smaller in ASP. I think that holds true for the most part, given any different complexity of processing or testing or any yield variation. From our perspective, wafer size is a good indicator of cost, and therefore it becomes a good indicator of price. From our perspective, we price for a given margin and the market dynamic, and we're very confident, even at lower ASPs, that our margins will continue to maintain where they have been. That implies those profit dollars are lower then? Yeah. Absolutely. I think on a percentage basis, the margins are going to be stable, with the top line coming down because of market shrinkage. The dollars at the bottom will be lower. Okay. The easy question I had, hopefully, is just trying to unpack the Datacom products a little bit. It sounds to me that the DML chips and the 5G exposure China is pretty decent size, probably bigger than I was guessing, and maybe EML maybe a little bit smaller. Can you give us a little more color on how to think about the proportions coming from different products within Datacom, so helps us think about this trending? Thank you. Sure. I'd say that our EML business grew 40% year-over-year. The growth in Datacom is coming from EMLs. We sell DMLs to the 5G front haul. We sell DMLs to transceiver suppliers that sell into hyperscale data centers. Although that is starting to soften as well as those hyperscalers are moving from 100G transceivers to 200G and 400G transceivers. We're going to see a rapid shift not only from the reduction in 5G deployments, but also the shift from 100G in the data center to 200G and 400G. Our focus and pressure is really on how do we add capacity or shift capacity from DMLs to EMLs, and it's not straightforward as you might think, because there is difference in complexity with respect to the processing of an EML compared to a DML. I think you can assume that pre 5G slowdown, it was probably around 50/50-ish, and I think you can model that in the datacom business. If you look at Q4 business, I'd say it's dramatically EML heavy, and that'll continue to grow through the first half of the fiscal year. The next question comes from Meta Marshall with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Great. Thanks. I get a couple questions for me. One on with the Coherent deal and deciding to do a share repurchase. What is your current appetite for M&A, particularly given Silver Lake had been a potential partner when you were looking at the Coherent acquisition. It would seem as if by opting for a share repurchase, you were looking to be maybe less active in the near term. On the second question, as you look at your telco forecast going forward, have you incorporated what could potentially be incremental slowdowns due to what we're seeing in India right now? Yeah, that looks like three questions, Meta. Okay, let me take the M&A. I'll have Wajid talk about the share repurchase. We still believe that M&A is strategic for us, and will create inorganic value for our shareholders, and we're still focused on doing that. I think we have a track record of successful M&A, and that's what we're looking for. I think we are disappointed that Coherent went the way it went, although I think it also is an opportunity for us to step back and say, what is the next acquisition? At this point in time, management and the board believe that the value of organic value creation is the best place to put our cash. I'd say Wajid can talk about the cash generation we've had, and the decision on the share repurchase, then I'll come back to the telecom question. Go ahead, Wajid. Yeah, no, I think we've struck a perfect balance in terms of our capital allocation strategy. As you know, we've historically invested heavily in CapEx to support our growth as well as in selective M&A transactions. The beauty of the $700 million share buyback that our board has authorized is that it's just a little bit larger than the amount of cash we've generated over the last 12 months, and it still leaves us with a lot of firepower to go ahead and do M&A transactions as we choose to. I think it gives us optionality, and it allows us to maintain flexibility moving forward as well. We're looking forward to putting some cash to work in order to be able to buy back some shares, especially at current levels. On your third question on telecom forecast and incremental impact of things like what's going on in India. It's hard to say. I think our perspective is that we've seen a continued slow ramp-up of telecom even through this time. Our expectations are that that continues. I think in talking to our customers, they're still deploying in India today. If things get much worse, which hard to believe or hard to imagine, that could be impacted. So far today, it's still deploying, but not at the rate it would otherwise if there had not been such an influx of cases. The next question comes from John Marchetti from Stifel. Thanks very much. Just following up for a minute, Alan, on that telecom comment. With some of the new wins that you have for the M x N with some of the Western vendors, on your sort of first half fiscal year outlook, do you expect those sorts of deployments to continue to ramp? I guess, has your expectation for that ramp slowed relative to maybe where you were a quarter or so ago? I'd say no. I'd say we're pretty much tracking to where we expected. I think we had expected that there'd be muted growth as a result of challenges of deploying during the pandemic. We're very happy with the progress of the design cycle of our product in next generation systems for not just Chinese NEMs, but also the Western NEMs that we talked about in the script. I think from our perspective, we're poised both M x N, indium phosphide, coherent components and modules. As or if the deployments accelerate, we'll be ready. Maybe just as a follow-up on the 5G deferral side, is it your sense that inventory levels got way ahead of themselves because of some of the risks associated with all the prior administration's efforts to hamper some of that growth there? Is this a result of the delays in some of those tenders? Just curious where you think maybe those inventory levels are right now and if it's a couple of quarters to move that out, or if we still have to wait and see what some of these new expected tenders actually deliver. Thanks. I think if you go back in time, last year, there was expectation that there'd be 1 million base stations in China, or some number like that. There was approximately 60% of those deployed. Same kind of outlook was for calendar 2021. I think it's similar kind of disappointment, if you will, in that 600 million-680 million base stations look like they're going to be deployed, but not a lot have been deployed in the first half. Our belief is that starts picking up this summertime, but won't have meaningful impact on our business until the middle part of the fiscal year. That's where we think the inventory throughout, whether that's at the radio base station supplier or at their transceiver supplier or in our web, there's that much inventory where I think that it needs to ramp up and it needs to start deploying before we see any meaningful deployment. I'd say it's solely due to the U.S.-China geopolitical issues and their ability to get chips for the base stations. That redesign is happening. Our expectation is that that'll start picking up in the second half of the calendar year. The next question comes from Ananda Baruah with Loop Capital. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks guys for taking the question. Two for me if I could as well. Really, clarification is the first one. You guys talked about on 3D sensing, there both being a market down component and then the pricing component. How much of the guidance is market down versus the pricing on the smaller design? Also you've seen pricing pressure, what you call pricing pressure. I have a quick follow-up. Thanks. Hi, this is Chris. Good morning. I think, well, the market down is the combination of normal price erosion and the smaller chip size, which reduces the dollar content, if you will. To be clear, and I think Alan mentioned this in the prepared remarks, we're not opining on anything around volumes or mix within the market, if you will. This is purely sort of normalizing for those factors, just about lower dollar content and normal price erosion. I would say the pricing environment is normal. There's not unusual pressure, right? We've provided price downs for our customers every year since we got into this business. We've seen price increases as chip sizes have gone up and prices come down with normal price erosion, or in this case, when there's a redesign and the chip is smaller. That said, we also have a product roadmap well-aligned with our customers that includes designs that integrate additional functionality, enable lower cost, higher performance, maybe integrates other optical capabilities, reduces packaging costs, package sizes, et cetera. That will help us capture more dollar content over time as those products are launched. Going back to the question about the market in fiscal 2022, there's other customers coming online in other markets and other applications, but they won't come online fast enough to offset the impact that we're seeing at some of the major customers with the dollar content and normal price erosion. As they come online through fiscal 2022 and into fiscal 2023, then we believe the market will re-accelerate. That sounds interesting. Sorry, maybe just one other thing to add on the market outlook is that different than where we were on the last earnings call, which was our expectations to have a major Android customer incorporate 3D sensing, and recently they made the decision not to do it in this generation of products. That also puts pressure on expectations around the market when the major Android customer decided not to incorporate 3D sensing. That put some pressure on our outlook for the market in fiscal 2022. That was actually my follow-up. I appreciate that. Do you think, just to that end, do you see other opportunities sort of in the Android space aside from that one vendor that still could be included in what was your thought process 90 days ago? Thanks. Yeah. I think we continue to be very excited about the Android adoption. It's obviously been slower than we've expected, and I'm sure everybody's expected. This year has, I think, been rough for Android suppliers overall, given things like COVID-19 has really impacted them compared to our largest customers. I think, Alan, there's strong interest across the board for kind of the LiDAR-based approach or time-of-flight based approaches for world-facing, for photography, AR/VR applications. Alan highlighted in the script a, what we think is a very positive data point that we had a customer launch a great smartphone with world-facing capabilities, really focused on photography. This is a customer who also sells components, if you will, image sensors and others, to the Android universe en masse, and therefore, their technologies or their designs frequently proliferate to much larger Android manufacturers. That's really been one of the technical barriers to the Android world, is that this is harder technology, and then some of the more low-cost Android manufacturers need help with the technology. It's great to see a leading technology, maybe not a leading volume manufacturer of phones adopt it so that that technology will proliferate a bit further. The next question comes from George Notter with Jefferies. Please go ahead. Hi, guys. Thanks very much. I guess I wanted to keep going on the 3D sensing discussion here. Any changes in the performance characteristics that you're seeing out of the marketplace, either through world-facing or front-facing, is that driving the ASP and chip size changes, or is this more of a sort of natural evolution of the market? George, I think it's more of a capability that we've been able to provide to our customer jointly. These are chips that we've talked about with our customer two and three years ago. As our capability and technology improves, we can combined develop a product that has more functionality at a smaller size. As, I think, Chris talked about, our ability to then go from that stage of the game to adding more functionality on the chip that now our customer needs to go to third parties and add different types of components. As we roll out those types of functionalities that are embedded in the chip at a lower cost, we will capture more dollar content. I'd say this is no different than just the evolution of driving lower cost solutions at higher functionality and features. One thing to add to that, I think that maybe got lost is while the chips may be smaller, there's still a lot of lasers. In fact, as many lasers, if not more, than in the past. That presents a lot of technical challenges to accomplish that. As Alan said, that's why it's taken us several years in working with the customers to achieve that level of density on the chip. The reason I highlight that, it also provides a level of differentiation and barrier to entry for other folks in the market. It's not like the chip's getting smaller and dumber. It's getting smaller and more complex, if you will. Great. Thanks. The next question comes from Michael Genovese with West Park Capital. Please go ahead. Thanks very much. There's a lot of hand-wringing on this call about the market share, but I feel like you answered it better in the prepared remarks, and I want to make sure I understand correctly, because you're saying that the market's going to be down 20%-25% in the second half of the calendar year, and your revenues are going to be down 5%. Doesn't that suggest some share switch is swinging back to you as this new smaller chip is rolled out? Doesn't the math just tell us that you're gaining share? Well, keep in mind, 3D sensing is a portion of our business. As we look at our different other businesses, lasers is going to grow, telecom is going to grow, data com is going to be under pressure. Our commentary was around the market and the market being down 20%-25% in the fiscal year, not just the fiscal first half. In the fiscal year, our belief, due to the chip size and the lack of adoption by a major Android customer, that the market itself will be down 20%-25%. Now, how that translates into our revenue is hard to say, but it's going to have a negative impact on our revenue, assuming we maintain the share that we have today. I think that's what you can model into your first half model. If it turns out that we gain a bunch of share, then great, but our expectations and our guidance don't count on that. Got it. Okay, great. I just wanted to ask for your perspective. The indium phosphide news is good news. As we track that market, there's a lot of interest in pluggables and 400 and ZR and ZR+. What's your perspective on that market? Does Lumentum need to play there? Is it going to inhibit or drive the growth rate of indium phosphide going forward? Just any general commentary there would be appreciated. Thank you. Thanks, Mike. Certainly, we're very excited about our opportunities for our indium phosphide platform. Very differentiated capabilities. We are already supplying high performance indium phosphide components into 800G applications, as an example. We're also very focused on 400G pluggable modules. There's a whole range of performance requirements all the way from metro long haul, then down to DCI and ZR type modules. Working on all of them. Some of them are in production, others are in the sampling phase, and we're kind of prioritizing our investments based on our ability to differentiate our products and size of the opportunity and customer feedback. It's a great opportunity for us given the unique indium phosphide platform we have. The next question comes from Christopher Rowland with Susquehanna. Please go ahead. Hi, guys. Thanks for the question. I guess my first one's pretty broad. I guess looking out into the next year, with the best crystal ball you guys have, do you expect to grow revenue year-over-year? Secondly, you talked about the re-acceleration maybe in the back half. Maybe talk about what this looks like, how it kind of manifests itself through your various segments as well. Thank you. Yeah. Christopher, maybe I could comment, and Chris or Wajid can chime in. Our focus is to give you what we know when we know it, and our outlook for the first half of the fiscal year changed. That's why we made the exception and gave you guidance for the first half so that you knew as soon as we knew, and I think that's why we gave first half guidance. We're not going to talk about the year. I think it's too hard to predict, let alone what's going to happen two quarters out as opposed to four or five quarters out. I think what we can comment on is our progress on new products and new design wins with customers, and that's going extremely well. As the market picks up or as deployments pick up, we'll be there for our customers, and we'll be really focused on making sure we get them what they need. That said, we are investing in capacity for those key products. ROADMs we talked about. We're investing in our wafer fabs, both in datacom as well as our indium phosphide capabilities for coherent components. We are investing in anticipation of that picking up, and we'll be ready for our customers. The next question comes from Fahad Najam with MKM Partners. Please go ahead. Thank you for taking my question. I have a clarification first. The deferred revenue from the EMLs of $15 million, is that accounted into your guidance, or is that completely out of your guidance or booking? Yeah, Fahad, it's Wajid here. The impact of the $15 million was on fiscal Q3. Any type of recovery we see of that, whether it's in Q4, whether it's in the first half of fiscal 2022, has already been incorporated in our guidance that we've provided. Okay. Now to my question. Alan, it's not surprising that ASPs were coming down. Our checks had indicated that ASPs will come down as your lead customer moves to a combined projector and flood illuminator module. If our checks are also right, in the next generation of this customer, presumably they're going to move to a behind-the-glass model. There, I think your technology is significantly far better or more advanced than some of your peers. To that extent, you expect acceleration in fiscal 2022. Is that based on an assumption of, one, your share gains, or is that based on an assumption that there is primarily more proliferation of 3D sensing across more SKUs with this customer and also, generally speaking, more broader adoption by Android? If you could parse that comment about re-acceleration in fiscal 2022. Sure. Well, I think from re-acceleration in fiscal 2022, what we had intended to say or what we had expected to really message was a lot of design wins happening now for different industries, whether that be automotive, security, biometrics, and access control and things like that are happening now that should accelerate through fiscal 2023. We're still hopeful that Android comes online in fiscal 2023. I think our outlook is really more around added customers, added markets. As far as next generation of devices for our lead customers, we're working on many different things. Until they get close to deciding what's the plan of record, we're working on many different things without knowing whether it's actually going to be the plan of record for fiscal 2023. We're just making sure we're the design source for them, and we will lead them, whether that's a continuation of existing designs or new designs when they choose to put them in. We have time for one more question in our allotted time. The next question comes from Tom Diffely from D.A. Davidson. Please go ahead. Yes, good morning. Thanks for squeezing me in here. I had a question on just the nice margin expansion on a year-over-year basis. Based on the cost reduction in some of the new products that you're rolling out, has most of the benefit now been realized, or is there runway for extending the expansion going forward on a margin basis? Yeah. Hi there. I'll start off. It's Wajid here. On our gross margins, you're right to point out a lot of the year-over-year improvement that we've had across our optical communications products. Our lasers margins have come down year-over-year, primarily because our volume levels have been lower. As Alan noted in his remarks, and even in the Q&A session, we're expecting our lasers business to continue to improve, not only in Q4, but throughout fiscal 2022. That should have a corresponding positive impact on the gross margins as it relates to lasers. Within optical communications, we're continuing to expect margins to hold quite well, primarily because of some of the product mix benefits we'll start seeing as EML capacity comes on board. We talked about our 50% gross margin model a couple of quarters ago as we put it out there. As you can see, even with our fiscal Q3 actual results year to date, as well as what we're forecasting for Q4, our current expectation is that fiscal 2021 will end up with gross margins north of 50%, we're targeting a 50% margin model for fiscal year 2022 as well, despite some of the puts and takes that we've talked about during the call. I think that continues to be our target and our product and our customer deployments that we're seeing support that. Great. Thank you. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Jim Fanucchi for any closing remarks. Thank you. This concludes our call for today. We would like to thank everyone for attending, and we do look forward to talking with you again when we report the fourth quarter fiscal 2021 results. Have a good day.