Thank you for standing by for Lattice Semiconductor's fourth quarter 2020 financial results call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. Later, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. At that time, if you have a question, you will need to press star one on your push button phone. A replay will be available approximately two hours after the call today. The replay dial-in number is 404-537-3406. The conference ID number is 4,589,457. The replay will also be accessible on Lattice's website at www.lscc.com. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Rick Muscha, Lattice Semiconductor's Director of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, operator, and good afternoon, everyone. With me today are Jim Anderson, Lattice's President and CEO, and Sherri Luther, Lattice's CFO. We'll provide a financial and business review of the fourth quarter of 2020 and the business outlook for the first quarter of 2021. If you have not obtained a copy of our earnings press release, it can be found at our company website in the investor relations section at latticesemi.com. I would like to remind everyone that during our conference call today, we may make projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future events or the future financial performance of the company. We wish to caution you that such statements are predictions based on information that is currently available, and that actual results may differ materially. We refer you to the documents that the company files with the SEC, including our 10-Ks, 10-Qs, and 8-Ks. These documents contain and identify important risk factors that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those contained in our projections or forward-looking statements. This call includes and constitutes the company's official guidance for the first quarter of 2021. If at any time after this call we communicate any material changes to this guidance, we intend that such updates will be done using a public forum, such as a press release or a publicly announced conference call. Some financial information that we present during the call will be provided on both a GAAP and a non-GAAP basis. By disclosing certain non-GAAP information, management intends to provide investors with additional information to permit further analysis of the company's performance and underlying trends. Management uses non-GAAP measures to better assess operating performance and to establish operational goals. For historical periods, we provided reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to GAAP financial measures that can be found on the investor relations section of our website at latticesemi.com. Before we get started, I'd like to let everyone know that we will be hosting a virtual Investor Day in May. We will be sharing more details over the coming months and hope you can all join us. Let me now turn the call over to Jim Anderson, our CEO. Thank you, Rick, and thank you everyone for joining us on our call today. I want to start by thanking the Lattice team, as well as our partners and customers, for their strong support and execution in 2020. I'm pleased with the progress that we made last year, and I'm even more excited about the opportunities ahead of us in 2021. Let me now cover a few highlights from 2020. We grew revenue double digits year-over-year in our two largest segments of Communications and Computing and Industrial and Automotive. We expanded non-GAAP gross margin by 170 basis points year-over-year, closing Q4 at 61.6% as we continue to execute on our strategy of pricing optimization and product cost reduction. We expanded profitability with non-GAAP net income increasing 20% year-over-year. On our hardware roadmap, our team executed on time and launched two new products based on our Nexus platform. We also launched three new software products focused on embedded vision applications, platform security, and embedded system design. Let me now provide an overview of our business by end market for 2020. In the communications and computing market, revenue increased 12% year-over-year, which is the second consecutive year of double-digit revenue growth in this segment. The increase was driven by growth in servers, client computing, and 5G infrastructure. In servers, growth was driven by expansion in both attach rates and ASPs year-over-year. In client computing, growth was driven by the ramp of new client computing platforms, including a new platform ramp that began production in Q4. In 5G infrastructure, we saw strong growth year-over-year, reflecting our higher content in 5G versus 4G. We continue to see communications and computing as a long-term growth driver, given its multiple growth vectors. Turning now to the Industrial and Automotive market, revenue increased 11% year-over-year, despite some end market softness due to the global pandemic. Our business grew across a number of applications, such as Industrial automation, safety, and robotics, where Lattice solutions provide significant competitive advantages for our customers. As the need for Industrial and Automotive electronics continues to increase, the Lattice product portfolio is well positioned for long-term growth. Turning now to consumer, revenue declined 40% in 2020 due to weaker demand caused by the global pandemic, as well as the expected mix shift in our business. We saw this segment stabilize towards the end of the year with a sequential revenue increase from Q3 to Q4. The quality of this revenue stream has improved over the last two years as we've targeted higher value, multi-generational designs that better leverage our FPGA portfolio. I'll now provide some highlights of our recent product roadmap execution. I'm very pleased with our team's execution in 2020. When we launched our Nexus FPGA platform in December of 2019, we committed to releasing two additional Nexus-based products in 2020. Both products were launched on time, as promised to our customers. In June, we launched Certus-NX, which is focused on general purpose FPGA applications. In December, we launched Mach-NX, our second-generation security FPGA. We continue to be pleased with the broad market adoption of our Nexus platform across all of our market segments, I look forward to sharing more information at our upcoming Investor Day about additional new products on our roadmap. Another key element of our R&D strategy is to develop a broader portfolio of software solutions to make it fast and easy for our customers to design our products into their systems and get to market quickly. During 2020, we significantly strengthened our software portfolio. In the first half of the year, we launched mVision, our embedded vision software stack, as well as Lattice Propel, our embedded system design environment. In the second half, we launched Sentry, our platform security software stack. In summary, I'm very pleased with the progress we made in 2020. We significantly strengthened our product portfolio as we accelerated the cadence of new products and continued to execute towards our long-term financial model. Our two largest market segments grew double digits year-over-year, and we expanded our net income by 20%. As we began 2021, customer engagements across all our markets are extremely strong, and our team is energized and focused on executing our strategy for sustained revenue growth and increased profitability. I'll now turn the call over to our CFO, Sherri Luther. Thank you, Jim. We are pleased with our full year 2020 results. In a challenging environment, we delivered significant profit expansion, continued to strengthen our balance sheet, and ended the year in a net cash position for the first time in six years. Let me now provide a summary of our results. Fourth quarter revenue was $107.2 million, up 4% sequentially from the third quarter and up 6.9% year-over-year. Revenue growth came primarily from our two largest segments, Communications and Computing and Industrial and Automotive. The consumer market segment grew sequentially in Q4 but was down year-over-year, and IP revenue was lower. Full year 2020 revenue was $408.1 million, up 1% from 2019. Revenue growth from Industrial and Automotive, as well as Communications and Computing, was offset by lower revenue in consumer and IP. Gross margin on a GAAP basis was flat at 60.5% in Q4 compared to the prior quarter, but was up 130 basis points compared to the year-ago quarter. Our non-GAAP gross margin increased 10 basis points to 61.6% in Q4 compared to the prior quarter and was up 200 basis points compared to the year-ago quarter. For the full year 2020, gross margin on a GAAP basis expanded to 60.1%, up 110 basis points from 2019. Our non-GAAP gross margin for the full year 2020 was 61%, up 170 basis points from 2019. The gross margin improvement in 2020 was a result of our margin improvement strategy, primarily pricing optimization and product cost reductions. Q4 GAAP operating expenses were $47.5 million, compared to $49.5 million in the prior quarter and $43.8 million in the year-ago quarter. On a non-GAAP basis, operating expenses were $37.5 million, compared to $36 million in the prior quarter and $35.3 million in the year-ago quarter. For the full year 2020, GAAP operating expenses increased from $179.4 million in 2019 to $192.9 million in 2020. On a non-GAAP basis, operating expenses for the full year 2020 remained relatively flat versus 2019 at $146.2 million, as we increased spending in R&D and decreased spending in SG&A. Specifically, as we continue to invest in our product portfolio expansion, R&D increased to 19.2% of revenue in 2020 from 18.1% of revenue in 2019. At the same time, we reduced SG&A to 16.6% of revenue in 2020 from 17.5% for the full year 2019. Q4 GAAP earnings per basic share was $0.12 and $0.11 per diluted share compared to $0.09 in the prior quarter and $0.10 in the year-ago quarter. Q4 non-GAAP earnings per basic share was $0.20 and $0.19 per diluted share, which was flat compared to the prior quarter and increased from $0.17 in the year-ago quarter. For the full year 2020, GAAP EPS of $0.35 per basic share and $0.34 per diluted share increased from the full year 2019 of $0.33 per basic share and $0.32 per diluted share. On a non-GAAP basis, EPS for the full year 2020 of $0.72 per basic share and $0.69 per diluted share increased from the full year 2019 of $0.62 per basic share and $0.59 per diluted share. Driving cash flow generation continues to be a key focus area for the company. For the full year 2020, we generated $92 million in cash from operations. We also repurchased approximately 400,000 shares or $15 million in stock under our stock buyback program, exiting the year with $182 million in cash, continuing our net cash positive position. Let me now review our outlook for the first quarter. Revenue for the first quarter of 2020 is expected to be between $106 million and $114 million. Gross margin is expected to be 61.5% ±1% on a non-GAAP basis. Total operating expenses for the first quarter are expected to be between $38 million and $39 million on a non-GAAP basis. As we begin 2021, we are focused on accelerating revenue growth and expanding profitability as we build additional value for Lattice and our shareholders. Operator, we can now open the call for questions. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, if you have a question at this time, please press star, then the number one on your telephone keypad. Again, that is star one on your telephone keypad. We will pause for just a moment to compile the roster. Our first question is from Hans Mosesmann from Rosenblatt Securities. Your line is open. Thank you. Congratulations, guys. Good execution. Hey, a couple of questions. I guess the theme of this earnings season is supply constraints. How is that impacting your business? I have a follow-on. Thank you. Thanks, Hans. Thanks for the question. On supply, I think our supply chain team has done a pretty good job to make sure that our customers are being supported in terms of their demand. Certainly, there's tightness in the supply chain for the semiconductor industry overall. In terms of Lattice specifically, I think we're in a pretty good position right now. There were a couple things that we did proactively a number of quarters ago to put us in a good position with respect to supply. The first thing I'd point out is, if you recall back in Q2 of last year, we said we were going to start to build inventory strategically to make sure that we had plenty of supply, plenty of inventory to support our customers' natural demand, and then also any upside that they might see. In Q2, we built inventory. We did build inventory again in Q3 and Q4, and we built inventory specifically on high-running parts, where there's significant volume and no risk of obsolescence. I want to make sure to point out that that's Lattice internal inventory. That's not a channel or distributor inventory that I'm referring to, so Lattice internal inventory. I think that's put us in a really good spot in terms of supporting our customer demand moving forward. The second thing that we did, and this was really back in 2019, is we began working really closely with our strategic suppliers as we changed and improved our supply chain strategy. Working really closely with those suppliers to make sure we were giving them long-term multi-year outlooks on our demand expectations and working with them proactively to plan out capacity over a multi-year period, including not just nominal capacity, but the potential to drive upside capacity as well. I think those kind of two proactive actions that we took put us in a pretty good spot with respect to supply to our customers. Hans, you said you had a follow-on as well? Yeah, I did. I'm curious. You guys grew despite having that consumer part of the business. From an FPGA perspective, can you give us perspective as to how are you guys growing and Xilinx and Intel's Altera or programmable business were in decline in 2020? Yeah. Thanks, Hans. We're actually quite pleased with our results, particularly in our two largest market segments. That's Comms and Compute and Industrial, Auto, which in Q4 accounted for roughly 85% of our revenue overall. We really view those as long-term growth areas for the company. If you look at 2020, first in comms and computing, we grew 12% year-over-year for full year. Actually, in Q4, comms and computing grew 20% year-over-year in terms of just Q4. We're seeing a number of Lattice-specific growth drivers within that segment. We've talked about servers in the past. We've seen an expansion in our server attach rate or the number of Lattice chips that are being shipped per server, as well as increasing ASPs for the parts that go into servers as we brought more content, more capability to servers. We've also seen a number of new client computing platforms that began production last year and that will ramp into full production this year, and we'll see the benefit of a full year's worth of production. 5G infrastructure was a good year-over-year growth driver for us last year as well. Again, that falls within our Comms and Compute segment. In Industrial and Auto, despite a weak end market with respect to the pandemic, quite pleased with, again, the performance in Industrial and Auto, 11% growth year-over-year. Actually, if you look at just Q4, 16% growth year-over-year. Really what's driving that is new platforms with our customers around industrial automation, robotics, industrial safety. Yeah, certainly the consumer segment was pretty weak for us last year due to the pandemic as well as an expected mix shift in our business. We're quite pleased with our execution on Comms and Compute and Industrial Auto, and we expect those to be growth drivers moving forward as well. Great. Thank you. Congratulations. Yeah. Thanks, Hans. Your next question is from Alessandra Vecchi from William Blair. Congratulations from me as well on an amazing quarter in a challenging environment. To that extent, just to dig a little deeper maybe in the Industrial and Automotive segment in particular, can you help us understand how much impact maybe some initial revenue from the Nexus CrossLink-NX contributed to that strength, or thinking about Nexus platform being more broad-based applications? Thanks, Alessandra. Actually, good question. If you recall, in December of 2019 is when we launched our first Nexus-based product, and that was CrossLink-NX. At that time, we had set the expectation that we'd like to see first production shipments within about one year, which would've been the end of 2020. That's exactly what we saw. We saw initial production shipments of that first Nexus-based product late last year. Now we expect that product to continue to ramp into full production through this year and into following years. We expect CrossLink-NX to be a contributor to growth this year. That initial production shipment of Nexus platforms or Nexus products is a really important milestone for us because it kind of marks the beginning of the Nexus revenue ramp. The other product that we launched last year in the Nexus family in mid last year was Certus-NX, and that's our general purpose FPGA based on the Nexus technology. We would expect that to start to contribute to production revenue later this year, in the back half of this year. Yeah, it's good to see that initial Nexus platform ramp happening. As that ramps, the Nexus products are applicable to really all of our market segments over time. We expect that to be a good contributor to growth moving forward. Maybe just an extension to that in terms of the gross margin. You had really nice, if I'm doing the back of the envelope math correctly, really nice improvement on the product gross margin front. On the total gross margin basis, at 61.6%, now you're getting close to that 62% plus. I'm sure that'll be a topic for the May Analyst Day. Can you help us understand what additional impact as these Nexus products start to gain traction, how much that could further lift the gross margin from these levels and just generally how we should think about gross margin, especially as Industrial and Comms continues to gain traction? Yeah, certainly. The business model target that we put out there is for our gross margin to be over 62%. That's the target that we put out for ourselves in May of 2019, our last Investor Day. I think we've made really good, steady progress against that goal, most recent quarter at 61.6% gross margin. What's driven the gross margin progress to date is mostly around pricing optimization and product cost reduction. We had put in place a strategy of pricing optimization and a strategy of product cost reductions, began executing that in early 2019, that's continued through last year. We expect to continue those strategies moving forward. Those will continue to contribute to gross margin expansion. You're exactly right. The other help that we'll get on the gross margin is our new products are designed to be accretive to the overall corporate margin. As we ramp new products, the intention is over time that those would help drive gross margin expansion as well. At our upcoming Investor Day in May, we'll talk more about gross margin and expectations moving forward. Perfect. Thank you so much. With that, I'll pass it on to the next person. Thanks, Alessandra. Your next question is from Matt Ramsay from Cowen. Thank you very much. Good afternoon. Jim, I wanted to ask a quick question about the consumer business, and despite all of the COVID-19 operational challenges, you guys grew revenue as a company and the two main segments of the business grew well into the double digits and grew 20% in the fourth quarter. You had this huge consumer headwind, and you mentioned in your script the quality and visibility around some of those consumer revenues being much improved. If you could talk a little bit about your visibility in that segment going forward, just as a basis for overall growth of the company. Are we up, flat, down, looking into maybe the next 12 months as you see it today? Thanks. Yeah. Thanks, Matt. If you look at 2020, certainly consumer was a headwind for us in 2020. That was a combination of lower end market demand due to the pandemic, but also an expected big shift in our business. We did start to see a nice stabilization in that business at the end of the year. Consumer revenue was up sequentially from Q3 to Q4. One of the things that I mentioned in the prepared remarks, which you mentioned, is the underlying quality of that revenue stream has improved significantly over the last one to two years. What's happened is we've been transitioning the consumer revenue stream away from what I would call more volatile short-term revenue streams to much more reliable multi-year revenue streams. Things like prosumer applications, high-end audio systems, or high-end audio devices, which typically have multi-year lifetimes, typically carry higher gross margins and are frankly a much more predictable revenue stream. Our consumer revenue started to stabilize in the back half. We're expecting it to be much more stable moving forward. We'll probably give more color at the Investor Day in May on expectations for the consumer segment moving forward. Also Industrial Automation or Industrial and Auto and Comms and Compute. We still see Communications and Computing and Industrial and Auto as the primary growth drivers for us moving forward. Although we don't see consumer providing the same headwind that it has in the past. We'll give a little bit more color at that Investor Day in May. No, great. That's really helpful. Appreciate it. I guess the next question I had is for Sherri. OpEx bumped up a little bit, which I guess you would expect given the investments you're making to launch the Nexus products. Maybe this is an Analyst Day question as well. Any thoughts as to how you'd expect OpEx to trend going forward? There's kind of the puts and takes of does the pandemic end, do people start traveling again? You're launching new products. A lot of the development costs of what you're launching now are already in the run rate, I would imagine. Any thoughts there would be helpful. Thank you. Yeah, sure, Matt. Thanks for the question. Our Q4 OpEx did come in higher as we expected. For the reasons that you mentioned, that we continue to invest in our business. We are in a growth mode, so we are specifically investing in R&D and our product roadmap. Our Q4 OpEx, though, did come in at 35% of our revenue, which is at our target model. 2020 OpEx, I'll just note, dollars came in flat versus 2019, while at the same time, we increased our R&D spend by about 7.5% and reduced SG&A by 4.4%. Really more just as we continue, more example of how we continue to execute toward our long-term model of 35% OpEx. As you can see in our guide, we're guiding to a higher OpEx, and that's because we are in a growth mode again, as we continue to invest in our product portfolio roadmap going forward. We laid out at our Analyst Day in 2019 that our R&D target is 20% of revenue. We continue to work toward that goal, while at the same time trying to keep our OpEx at the 35% target level. That's how you can think about it, at least over the next quarter's guide and certainly at our Analyst Day in May, we'll give more color than that. Thanks very much. Thanks, Matt. Your next question is from Tristan Gerra from Baird. Hi, good afternoon. I was wondering if you could elaborate a little bit on the Q1 revenue that's obviously strong. Is that server or computing design wins that are ramping? I know you've mentioned Nexus. I was trying to see what the primary driver will be for the upside, and also, when would you expect Nexus to have a material impact, a positive impact on gross margin beyond the other factors that you've mentioned, such as pricing and cost? Yeah, thanks. On Q revenue, a little bit of what we're seeing by end market is, in speaking on a sequential basis from Q4 to Q1, certainly if you look at the midpoint of our guide for Q1, it's up sequentially from Q4. Where we're expecting to see sequential growth is, again, in communications and computing as revenue growth from servers, but also from those new client computing platforms that we mentioned. We mentioned that another new platform started shipping in Q4 of last year, so we'll see a benefit from that in Q1. That'll help drive some sequential growth in the comms and computing segment. We are expecting to see some sequential growth I ndustrial and Automotive as well. Some of those new platforms that are growing with our customers in things like Industrial automation and robotics, we expect to benefit from in Q1 as well. We expect consumer to be sequentially roughly flat sequentially. IP revenue, the smallest component of our revenue, we expect that to have a modest, small decline sequentially from Q4 to Q1. On the second part of your question on Nexus and its gross margin impact, yeah, I would expect gross margin impact from Nexus to be a little further out. I wouldn't expect a significant impact from Nexus on gross margin this year, but maybe in follow-on years in 2022 and 2023. I would expect most of our gross margin improvement that we would drive for our target this year to be focused on continued pricing optimization improvements as well as continued product cost reductions. Great. Thanks for the color. Then for my follow-up, just wondering if the SolarWinds hack is driving interest for your security chips into data center, which obviously has had a lot of success? What's the potential timing of security-related server refreshes? Also can that chip be added to existing system, or does it require to be part of a brand new server? Yeah. Thanks. Good question. Certainly what I would say is across, gosh, virtually all of our customers or customers across all market segments, we're seeing definitely a lot of interest in security and our security solutions. Our customers are concerned about making sure that all of their systems are fully secure, all the way from the software level down to the fundamental hardware level. The products that we brought to market now, like MachXO3D or FPGA with special security processing technology, are a great way to make sure that our customers are securing their hardware platform at the fundamental hardware and firmware level. Also the Sentry software stack that we brought out last year, which pairs with that chip to provide a full solution stack. Again, seeing a lot of good customer engagement and momentum. Certainly, customer concern around security and the security of their systems is helping drive customer engagement in our product roadmap around security. Then, Tristan, the second part of your question was around. You had kind of a second part of the question. Would you repeat that? Try to look at the potential timing. Are new design wins going to be for those chips, notably for the MachXO3D linked to new server refreshes, or can it be added onto existing architectures? Thank you. Yes. Those are primarily targeted new server deployments. Generally, customers don't do a lot of retrofitting of existing servers that have already been deployed. We don't see a lot of retrofitting, we would expect the opportunity of those chips being retrofitted into existing servers as pretty small. I would say the vast majority of growth will come from new deployments. That's really what we've been focused on with our customers. In terms of the revenue timing, MachXO3D, our first FPGA with that security technology, that started production in Q3 of last year. The production increased in Q4. It ramped nicely in Q4, and we would expect that to continue to ramp this year. It would be one of the growth drivers this year because we'll see a full year's benefit of that product in revenue this year in 2021. That's very useful. Thank you very much. Yeah. Thanks for the question. Your next question is from Mark Lipacis from Jefferies. Your line is open. Hi. Thanks for taking my question. I had a question on the software side. It seems like you've been focusing a lot on investing in software, and my question is, I'm trying to understand what is it getting you that you didn't have before? To what extent is the software that you're investing in expanding Lattice into new markets versus effectively just doing a better job and locking your customers into the existing markets? What was used before? What did your customers do before you developed the software stacks? Yeah. Thanks, Mark. The software stacks, which let me step back and just explain. We've been investing in higher-level software solution stacks, and that's really all around making it very easy for our customers to design our products into their system and get to market quickly. They can use the solution stacks as kind of pre-built, ready-to-go software libraries, tools, and reference platforms to get to market quickly. We've launched three to date. First one was our sensAI artificial intelligence software stack, second was our mVision embedded vision software stack, and the third was our Sentry software stack, which was focused on security solutions. I would characterize it in terms of customer as two types of customers that are very familiar with FPGAs and then customers that are kind of new to FPGAs. For customers that are already very familiar with FPGAs, they're already familiar with our products or our competitors' products. It makes it really easy to get their system designed quickly, to switch from a competitor's product to our product very quickly and get to market. The other category of customer, and this is very interesting to us, is customers that typically haven't used FPGAs in their designs in the past. These are, For instance, customers that have historically used microcontrollers, for example. We find that the software solution stack makes it much easier for a customer that's used a microcontroller in the past to switch over to our FPGA and again, get to market quickly. Of course, once that software is integrated into their system, that makes us very sticky in terms of future generation systems as well. Where we're seeing some of the advantages versus, for instance, microcontroller solutions is particularly in artificial intelligence applications. If you're doing inference at the edge of a network in an IoT or Industrial IoT application, inference applications, AI applications are inherently parallel, and they just run better on an FPGA because the FPGA can be designed or can be programmed to be a parallel path, parallel data processor, and can significantly outperform a microcontroller, and can be reprogrammed as the artificial intelligence algorithms change over time. So again, that software solution stack just makes it really easy for our customers, even microcontroller customers, to get at that FPGA benefit really quick, and again, get to market quickly. Great. That's very helpful. Thanks for that color. That kind of leads me to the follow-up. I don't know if it was 10 or 15 or 20 years ago, you think about an FPGA company having a glue logic kind of a product, and it would be Altera or Xilinx or Lattice. It seems like you are moving up the value chain, so to speak, and adding a higher level of value. If I think about your security solutions, and maybe the answer to the last question is part of that, it seems like it's not a standard kind of a solution. It seems like you have a, I don't know if it's application-specific solution, but what's the right way to think about the markets that you're prosecuting right now or the competitive environment that you're prosecuting right now? It seems like it's more than FPGA. Is it microcontrollers? Is that kind of effectively the right way to think about your market opportunities, where microcontrollers are right now? If you could help us, give us a framework for thinking about that'd be helpful. Thanks. Thanks, Mark. We're certainly competing against our traditional competitors in the FPGA space and against our traditional competitors we think we've got a great roadmap, particularly in the power efficient small size FPGAs that we produce. We are now competing against people beyond the FPGA space as well. I do think part of that is because we're targeting it not just being a component supplier or, as you called it, a glue logic supplier, but really being a critical architectural element of the solution that we're going into with our customers. We're trying to help our customers solve the architectural challenges and product competitiveness challenges that they're seeing in their business. That's really what our products, both hardware and software, are more and more tuned for moving forward. A great example of that, you mentioned security. That's a great example of security, platform-level security, firmware security, very important to customers. That's very important to our server customers, but really customers across multiple different markets. That's why we've developed, we've taken one of our well-known FPGAs and added to it security technology as well as the software on top of it to help customers solve that problem. Artificial intelligence is another great example. Customers across all of our market segments are trying to figure out, how do I add more intelligence to my system? How do I add more decision-making capability? FPGAs are just a natural fit, and in particular, our low power, very power-optimized FPGAs are a great fit for doing AI processing at the edge of the network. Again, with our software solution package, we're trying to provide not just glue logic, but some of the critical architectural elements of our customers' systems. I would say that that's broadening our applicability across the market, which is helping us to compete against a wider range of competitors that we've competed against in the past. Microcontrollers is one example, but also ASSPs as well. For us, it's really around focusing on our customer and making sure we're solving some of the big challenges that face them moving forward. That's very helpful. Thank you. Thanks, Mark. Your next question is from Christopher Rolland from Susquehanna. Your line is open. Hi there. I also want to echo my congrats on the quarter. In Industrial and Auto, that was mostly upside for us for our model. I believe auto is small for you guys, so I would assume it's mostly Industrial there, but perhaps tell us if that's not right. If you could speak to what's driving it a little bit more specifically there. Is it Industrial Automation? Is it vision? Is it glue logic? Or is it in fact auto? Any more color there would be great. Thanks. Yeah. Thanks, Chris. I think you're referring to the Q4, the most recent quarter results, right? Yeah quite a bit of strength in Industrial Auto. We saw it up sequentially in Q4, up 8% and up year-over-year by 16%. Yeah, very good performance in that segment. That is definitely driven by Industrial. Our Automotive segment is still a relatively small percentage of our Industrial, Auto segment. Now, we do see automotive electronics as a good long-term growth opportunity for the company because our products fit well into a number of different automotive applications like ADAS and infotainment systems, and we've got a very healthy design win pipeline. Yeah, the near-term, the recent revenue performance is really driven by Industrial. What we're seeing in Industrial is, I would say a couple of things. First of all, we did see just the end market strengthen in general towards the end of the year, so we benefited from that. More of the growth was driven by what I would call Lattice-specific growth drivers, and that is specific customer platforms, new customer platforms that are ramping. An example, I'll give, I guess, a couple different examples is, one is in Industrial robotics. We're seeing, I would say, a quickening pace of adoption of Industrial robotics and automation. I would say prior to the pandemic, we were already seeing a tremendous amount of interest from our Industrial customers on Industrial automation of robotics and safety applications. I would say with the experience of COVID-19 and the pandemic, that has really driven our Industrial customers to adopt Industrial automation and robotics and Industrial safety much quicker than maybe they had originally anticipated. We're well-positioned with a number of new platforms. Our products are really well-positioned there in Industrial Automation Robotics, but also Industrial Safety applications where our devices could be used to monitor, for instance, a workspace that has both humans and robots in the same workspace and make sure that the robot and human are at safe distances. If our system sees any potential safety lapses, it'll shut down the equipment, things like that. Those are some of the applications that we're excited about, both current applications and applications moving forward. Yeah, we'll give some additional color at that investor day in May about where we see some of the growth moving forward in that segment. Yeah, we're quite pleased with the performance in Q4. Great. Perhaps a follow-up for Sherri. Sherri, I don't know if you could force rank or just give us a rough idea of the kind of sequential movement for the segments into March. In terms of the color on our expected markets, is that what you're asking for, Chris? Exactly. The sequential movement. Yeah. Mm-hmm. Yeah. Just some color on strength. Yeah, sure. Absolutely. From a comms and compute market segment, we're expecting that to be up from Q4. Industrial and automotive, we're expecting that to be up as well. Consumer, we're expecting that to stabilize more from Q4. IP, we're expecting that to be down. If you recall, we've talked about our normal range for IP of between $3 million-$5 million per quarter, expecting that to come down slightly over time. That's how you can think about the next quarter. Thanks so much, Sherri. Appreciate it, and thank you, though. Sure. Thanks, Chris. Your next question is from Derek Soderberg from Colliers Securit. Your line is open. Hi, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my questions. I want to start with new products. The goal there was sort of to increase your FPGA market share at existing accounts. It sounds like there's a wider range of competitors now, but I guess as it relates to the more traditional competitors, now that you're starting to see new products ramp and as you've had roadmap discussions with those customers, can you describe how that market share dynamic is playing out? I guess maybe relative to expectations. Yeah. Thanks, Derek. I would say the customer engagement is very positive and a lot of customer momentum right now. I think customers see exactly what we see in the landscape is when you look at the FPGA landscape, our two traditional competitors, Intel PSG, which formerly Altera, and Xilinx, are focused on making very large, very high-power complex FPGAs primarily for data center computing applications. We're really focused at the other end of the spectrum. We're making small, very power efficient, very easy-to-use FPGAs with a lot of software content on top that can be used across just a really wide range of applications. A number of those applications that I talked about earlier today. When we sit with our customers, our customers see a very fresh, innovative, expanding portfolio of products from us, and they don't see that from anyone else in the industry. I think our customers are really excited about the roadmap they see in front of them from us. They see us investing in the segments and in the types of solutions and products that are important to them and they're excited about. I think the other thing that they see is they just see, look over the last, say, 18 months, if you just look at the number of products that we've brought out over the last 18 months, it's about three times the number of products that we were bringing out, say, three to four years ago. They see Lattice investing in the roadmap, building out the product portfolio, trying to solve their problems, and I think that's definitely helping drive share gain. We believe we gained share last year, we're certainly targeting continuing to gain share in the market segment that we serve moving forward. I think the customer momentum and engagement is definitely there, we're really excited about it. Great. As my follow-up, I wanted to ask Sherri on buybacks. This is the first time you're buying back shares with this team, spent $15 million. I guess I'm just wondering, what are your plans looking forward for additional buybacks or use of cash? Thanks. Sure. Thanks for the question, Derek. From a capital allocation perspective, stock buybacks are certainly one of the elements of that. As you mentioned, we did execute on purchased $15 million in shares in Q4 back. That was under an authorized buyback program that expired in February. We don't currently have an approved buyback plan right now, but it will continue to be an element of our capital allocation strategy that we'll look at as we move forward. The other elements of our capital allocation strategy include de-leveraging our balance sheet. We'll continue to look at that. Our leverage ratio came in at 1.4 for the quarter. You may recall earlier in 2020, we accelerated some of our mandatory debt payments so that we could lock in that lowest interest rate tier on our debt. We continue to be at that lowest interest rate tier. That, again, we'll continue to evaluate on a quarterly basis, but feel pretty comfortable that we're at the lowest level as far as the interest rate goes on that. Really the top priority from a capital allocation perspective is really investing in our product roadmap. We'll continue to do that. It's been evidenced by our three times cadence increase in our product launches. We'll continue to prioritize that from a capital allocation perspective. Great, thanks. Mm-hmm. Thank you. Your next question is from Richard Shannon from Craig-Hallum. Your line is open. Thanks, guys, for taking my question. Jim, you had a couple questions earlier regarding AI that I wanted to ask and kind of follow on and ask a slightly different angle here. Lattice, even before your tenure, was starting to focus in that area, I think mostly from a hardware perspective, and then you've added the sensAI application stack, if I got the name right, I think a couple of years ago. I guess my two-part question here is: how do we think about the success you've had in AI applications so far? Any way you can characterize or even quantify how much that's contributing to sales thus far, where you could go? To the degree to which your software stack has enabled that, I'd love to hear some characterization of how that's going. Yeah. Thanks, Richard. I would put it in two buckets is, first of all the fact that we're bringing an artificial intelligence or inference processing capability, both in terms of the hardware, but also the software solution, is definitely a door opener for us at customers. Customers that maybe we haven't engaged with in the past, that's definitely a great way to open the door and to begin to do business with them. We have customers across, I would say, every single market that we serve that, again, are looking at how do I add more intelligence, more capability, more decision-making to my systems. For a customer that we haven't had in the past, it's a great way to initiate that customer relationship and to begin to work with them on integrating Lattice solutions into their systems. Even for customers that maybe we've had for many years, it's really been an opportunity for us to expand the share of wallet, to expand our share of their spend, versus other semiconductors, whether that's expanding our share versus other FPGA competitors, where we're able to offer a better solution, more power efficient, higher performance, better software, or some of the other component suppliers that I mentioned earlier. I think it's both a way to help us expand into new customers, but also a way to expand share of wallet with existing customers. Okay. Fair enough. That's helpful. My follow-on question here was in your client platforms wins, you're starting to have some success for within computing. I guess a two-part question in that one. The first one is, where do you see the share potentially? It sounds like you would characterize, or my guess, you would characterize this as a low and starting point of share. Where can that go over time? Are these wins, are they at corporate average gross margins or with high volume PC things like, I guess I could see them being lower than average, but maybe you can characterize that as well. That'd be great. Yeah. Thanks, Richard Shannon, the first part of the question, the thing that we love about the client computing market is, look, it's a huge TAM. I don't know, I can't remember the exact numbers for this past year, but it's somewhere in the 250 million units or more number of units in client computing. For us, that's a tremendously big TAM, and significantly bigger, for instance, than the server market, which we've had a lot of great success and progress in the server market. Our objective is really to grow within the client computing space where we can provide a lot of different great capabilities in a client computing platform. Just a few examples is we were talking about artificial intelligence just a few minutes ago. We can provide that artificial intelligence capability in a client computing platform. We can detect, for instance, human presence around that client computing platform. We can detect how many people are looking at a client computing screen, for example. Another example would be we can provide security technology that makes sure that platform's secure. We can also provide signal aggregation and integration capability. A lot of different ways that we can provide value in a client computing platform and a huge TAM. We look at it as a great opportunity for the company moving forward. As I've shared, we did see a number of new client computing platforms begin production in this past year, and we'll benefit from a full year's revenue of those platforms this year and into coming years. As you can imagine, we've got more things that we're working on with our client computing customers. In terms of gross margins, I would say that client computing is just part of our overall Communications and Computing segment. We don't break out the sub-segments of that. In general, Communications and Computing runs in the neighborhood of our corporate average, and we would expect client computing to continue to operate towards around our corporate average. Our client computing gross margins have been improving along with our corporate average over time. Okay, fair enough. Thank you, guys. Thanks, Richard. Thanks, Richard. I'm showing no further question at this time. I would like to turn the call over back to Lattice CEO, Mr. Jim Anderson. Yeah. Thank you operator, and thanks everybody for joining us on the call today. We feel good about the progress that we made in 2020, both in terms of the financial progress as well as the progress that we made on both the hardware and software roadmaps. As we've talked about today, we have very strong customer momentum, and we're really excited about the path in front of us. We of course remain very focused on continuing to execute on both the business strategy as well as our product roadmap, and we look forward to sharing more details at our Investor and Analyst day in May. Operator, that concludes today's call. Thank you, sir. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation, and have a wonderful day.