Good day, and welcome to the Momentus Inc.'s second quarter 2022 earnings conference call. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent any background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question during that time, please press star one. If you would like to remove yourself from the queue, you may press star one again. I will now hand today's call over to Mr. Darryl Genovesi, Vice President of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, Tamika, and good morning, everyone. Welcome to Momentus' second quarter 2022 earnings conference call. With me here today are John Rood, Chief Executive Officer of the company and Chairman of its Board of Directors, as well as Jikun Kim, Chief Financial Officer. Each will provide prepared remarks. Following these prepared remarks, we'll take questions from analysts. In the interest of time, we would ask that you limit yourself to one question and one brief follow-up. Earlier today, we issued a press release and made a slide presentation available on our investor relations website, which provides an overview of our business and financial highlights for the quarter. You can download a copy of the press release and presentation slides at investors.momentus.space. During today's call, we will make certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are predictions, projections, and other statements about future events that are based on current expectations and assumptions, and as a result, are subject to risks and uncertainties. Many factors could cause actual future events to differ materially from the forward-looking statements in this communication. You should listen to today's call with the understanding that our actual results may be materially different from the plans, intentions, and expectations disclosed in the forward-looking statements that we make. For more information about factors that may cause actual results to materially differ from forward-looking statements, please refer to the earnings press release we issued today, as well as the company's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Readers are cautioned not to put undue reliance on forward-looking statements, and the company specifically disclaims any obligation to update the forward-looking statements that may be discussed during this call. Please also note that we will refer to certain non-GAAP financial information on today's call. You can find reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measures in our earnings press release. None of these non-GAAP financial measures is a substitute for or superior to measures of the financial performance in accordance with GAAP. With that, I'd like to turn the call over to our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, John Rood. Thank you, Darryl. Good afternoon. I'm delighted to be here today to talk to you about the progress that we made during the second quarter and our plans for the future. This was an eventful quarter for Momentus as we put our historical regulatory difficulties behind us and launched our first Vigoride into space. I'd like to extend a heartfelt thank you to the Momentus team, which continues to drive progress towards our goal of providing the backbone infrastructure services to support the emerging space economy. I'll provide some high-level comments on our activities during the second quarter. I'll spend some time discussing our plan for the second half of the year in 2023, with some emphasis on the planned cost reductions that we are implementing to conserve cash and extend our runway through the end of 2023. After I make my comments, our CFO, Jikun Kim, will take you through the Q2 financial highlights and financial outlook. Turning to slide three. The company made a lot of progress since our last earnings call. Highlights included retiring regulatory issues that we previously experienced and obtaining U.S. government licenses, completing assembly and ground testing of the Vigoride-3 orbital transfer vehicle, conducting the first launch of the Vigoride orbital transfer vehicle, deploying two customer satellites from Vigoride-3 during the second quarter and four more in the third quarter for a total of six customer satellites deployed from Vigoride-3 so far. Deploying an additional Momentus customer satellite from a third-party deployment system, which brings to a total of seven Momentus customer satellites placed in low Earth orbit thus far from Vigoride and the third-party system combined. Analyzing the results of our Vigoride-3 mission and identifying the root cause of each of the anomalies experienced during the mission and completing an in-depth review by an independent review team of experts. Finally, making solid progress on the preparation, assembly, and testing of our next Vigoride Orbital Transfer Vehicle that we plan to launch on the SpaceX Transporter-6 mission targeted for November 2022. Corrective actions to address all of the anomalies experienced on Vigoride-3 will be implemented on the Vigoride-5 vehicle that is targeted for launch in November, and we are on track to complete these modifications before the launch. We're pleased, as I said, to have retired regulatory issues that we previously experienced, and I'll talk about that. In particular, we continued to effectively implement our National Security Agreement overseen by the Department of Defense and Department of the Treasury. We secured all necessary government licenses and approvals to launch our first orbital transfer Vigoride vehicle, Vigoride-3 to space, including a second license update from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA, authorizing Vigoride-3 to operate a camera in space, which we received on April 27. A license from the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, authorizing Momentus to use radio frequencies to communicate with Vigoride, which we received on April 28. Momentus also received special temporary authorization or STA licenses from the FCC on June 9 and a thirty-day extension on July 13. Finally, a favorable payload determination from the Federal Aviation Administration, or FAA, which we received on May 4. As we look forward to our future missions, Momentus will no longer need to apply for a separate FAA payload determination. In the future, Momentus will be treated the same as the other payloads being launched to orbit by launch service providers such as SpaceX, who typically obtain such licenses from the FAA for their launch missions and the payloads they carry. Momentus will not need to reapply for NOAA licenses either unless we make changes to Vigoride's cameras, and that's because our existing NOAA license permits such activities. Like others in the space industry, we will need to apply to the FCC for radio spectrum licensing. In fact, we have already submitted our application for such a license from the FCC for the next launch of our Vigoride orbital transfer vehicle, targeted for November. The changes I just described to our licensing requirements speaks to the progress we've made improving the company's relationship with the U.S. government. It took an enormous amount of effort to get here, and we're glad to have put our historical regulatory difficulties behind us so we can focus on developing our technology. Let me talk now about our progress on technology development. Momentus has made substantial progress on technology development during the second quarter, achieving some major milestones, such as conducting our first launch of our Vigoride orbital transfer vehicle. We completed remaining ground testing on our first spacecraft, Vigoride -3. We then integrated customer payloads and shipped the spacecraft to the launch site at Cape Canaveral, Florida. We also completed work on our mission control facility at our headquarters in San Jose, California. On May 25, we sent Vigoride -3 to low Earth orbit onboard the SpaceX Transporter -5 mission, which utilizes the Falcon 9 launch vehicle. Recall from our last conference call that the primary objective of our inaugural demonstration mission was to test Vigoride on orbit, learn as much as possible from any issues encountered, and incorporate lessons learned into future Vigoride vehicles as we work to eventually certify a design for production. Experience is the best teacher. With that in mind, we have learned a lot from the Vigoride -3 mission so far and are busy implementing the lessons learned in our future spacecraft. While the primary objective of our first demonstration mission was to learn as much as possible, we also carried nine satellites on board Vigoride -3 and another payload for testing in space for a total of three customers. We deployed two of these customer satellites during the second quarter from Vigoride, and then Vigoride deployed four more customer satellites during the third quarter for a total of six satellites deployed from the Vigoride -3 vehicle thus far, with three more satellites remaining on board. As we reported in our June 13 mission update, as can be expected on a first flight, we experienced some issues during the mission. After being launched to low Earth orbit aboard the SpaceX Falcon 9 launch vehicle, the Vigoride -3 vehicle successfully separated from the launch vehicle. We subsequently established two-way communications with Vigoride -3 from our mission control center. We discovered that Vigoride -3 had experienced anomalies after its launch, primarily related to its deployable solar arrays. This placed the spacecraft in a low power situation. Since that time, we've been working to address these anomalies and deploy our customers' satellites. While we established two-way communications with Vigoride -3 on May 26 and confirmed on May 28 that we had successfully commanded it to deploy two customer satellites, we've not been able to continue two-way communication with the spacecraft since that time, given its low power state, although we have continued to broadcast commands to the vehicle from ground stations. As disclosed on June 13, we've determined that Vigoride -3's deployable solar arrays, which are produced by a third party and are folded and stowed during launch, did not operate as intended once in orbit. The body-mounted solar panels on Vigoride -3 that are fixed worked normally, providing some power to the spacecraft. This resulted in low power and communications issues with the vehicle. We have been working closely with the producer of the solar arrays and have identified the root cause of the deployable solar arrays not operating as intended, which was a mechanical issue with a hold-down bracket and a connector pin that did not release as intended. We also believe we've identified the root cause of the other anomalies that we experienced during this low power state with other spacecraft systems. We had an independent review team of highly experienced space experts in the relevant areas examine the data, and they concurred with the findings on root causes and corrective actions of the Momentus engineering team. We purposely designed redundancy into the Vigoride -3 spacecraft to create a more robust design, including by equipping the spacecraft with a mechanism to autonomously deploy customer satellites should the spacecraft lose communications with ground stations. Subsequent to the close of the quarter, Vigoride-3 deployed four additional customer satellites, including 2 on July 17 and two more on July 29. Again, in total, the Vigoride spacecraft has now deployed six of its nine customer satellites. The company is continuing efforts to deploy the remaining three customer satellites. Many systems and processes need to come together for a spacecraft to operate. While we can simulate some of this on the ground, there's simply no substitute for the knowledge gained by flying the vehicle on orbit. In the history of space flight, it's common to experience issues, particularly on early missions. Our primary objective here was to learn, and learn we did, about many important areas, I should say, that either performed as intended or needed improvement, from structures to software, avionics, thermal, and on-orbit dynamics, to name just a few. Again, we did not have issues in all of these areas. When things perform as intended, you also learn from that experience. In the cases where we experienced anomalies, we quickly identified root causes of all of the anomalies and are implementing corrective actions ahead of our next mission. Turning to slide four. Recall from our last conference call that we had two ports on the main Transporter-5 mission. We used our first port for Vigoride-3, as I described. On our second port, we used deployer hardware from one of our business partners to deploy customer payloads directly from the SpaceX rocket. That third-party deployer system, which is shown in the picture, deployed five satellites for four different customers, including one Momentus customer satellite and four of our partner's customer satellites. With the deployment of one Momentus customer satellite from this third-party deployer system, we have now deployed a total of seven customer satellites. That is six satellites from Vigoride-3 thus far and one satellite from this third-party deployer system. As I said on our last earnings call, this third-party deployer system cannot provide last-mile transportation service to precise customer orbits like Vigoride is designed to do. However, it meets the needs of some of our customers and potential customers, particularly those who don't need to get to a precise orbit and have less complex requirements and are looking for a lower-cost way to reach low Earth orbit. This represents an effort to explore other market segments that are adjacent to our current addressable market with Vigoride. Offering a lower-cost option alongside Vigoride allows us to address the market broadly in multiple ways and serve the diverse needs of our customers more economically than we could if we fly every one of them on a more capable Vigoride vehicle. We are happy with how this system performed and are evaluating the business case for expansion into this adjacent market segment. Turning to slide five. We continue to build out and improve our executive leadership team, adding high-caliber individuals that bring the type of experience and skill sets we need to grow our business. On our last call, I introduced the new leaders of our engineering, manufacturing, and supply chain teams. Charles Chase, our Vice President of Engineering, Nick Zello, our VP of Manufacturing and Operations, and Gary Bartmann, our VP of Supply Chain, all joined full time in the second quarter, and all three are already making significant contributions to our efforts to develop, manufacture, and test our Vigoride vehicles. Krishnan Anand is the latest addition to the superb group we've assembled to lead our technical team. Krishnan joined in late July as our Vice President of Program Management. Krishnan will be responsible for overseeing daily program management activities to meet cost, schedule, and performance requirements on our spacecraft. Krishnan brings a successful track record, scaling up program management at Kitty Hawk, a Silicon Valley startup that is developing electric airplanes, as well as a long career as an engineer and program manager at Lockheed Martin Space. Consistent with the strategy that we discussed on our prior call, we have also been adding engineering talent below the executive level. As we look forward, we will continue to opportunistically populate our company with talented individuals and develop them to position the company for a bright future. Turning to slide six. As I previewed in my introduction, we have developed and are now implementing a plan to reduce our operating costs. With these reductions, we now estimate that the cash on our balance sheet should carry us through the end of 2023. While we plan to be opportunistic about raising capital when we can, we believe it's prudent to plan to extend our existing cash runway given the state of the capital markets. We plan to fly our second Vigoride vehicle to low Earth orbit on the SpaceX Transporter-6 mission, which is currently targeted for November of 2022. We have also reserved space for Vigoride vehicles on Transporter-7, which SpaceX is currently targeting for February 2023, followed by Transporter-8, which is currently targeted for May 2023, and Transporter-9, which is currently targeted for October 2023. Over the next three months, our priority will be to apply all that we learned from our inaugural mission to ensure that our second mission is productive and puts us on a path to establish minimum product viability with Vigoride and to do so as efficiently and affordably as we can. Turning to slide seven. We plan to achieve some of the cost reductions that we're announcing today by exploiting operational efficiencies and cutting overhead spend. Another portion of our reductions relates to delaying R&D projects that we'd previously planned for the second half of 2022 and 2023, reducing spending on our efforts to develop a reusable version of our Vigoride vehicle. We continue to believe it is important for us to eventually develop a reusable Vigoride vehicle, as this has the potential to reduce our two largest cost items, manufacturing costs and launch costs, while also allowing us to add new revenue streams such as in-orbit refueling, maintenance, and de-orbiting. However, in the current capital markets environment, we think it makes sense to reduce company-funded spending on R&D projects like this with longer time frames to produce results in order to conserve cash and extend our runway. Doing so allows us to focus our near-term resources on our primary goal, which again is to incorporate lessons learned from our inaugural mission to ensure that our upcoming Vigoride demonstration missions are productive. We are increasing our focus on bidding for government programs at NASA and Department of Defense organizations. We see significant opportunities to gain government funding for our R&D efforts and technology development while supporting these critically important missions of our government. Before I hand the call over to our CFO, Jikun Kim, for comments on the Q2 financials, I just want to reiterate my excitement for the progress the company is making. While spacecraft development is challenging, and we've been forced to make some tough decisions recently, I'm pleased that we were able to put our historical regulatory difficulties behind us and launch our first spacecraft into orbit. We've now deployed seven of our customer satellites, including 6 from Vigoride, and we're hopeful that we'll be able to deploy the last three customer satellites in the coming weeks. Furthermore, for the initial technical challenges that we encountered, we were able to quickly get to root cause and put ourselves on track to implement corrective actions before our first follow-on mission as we seek to continue to mature our technology and service offerings. We're also implementing a cash reduction plan to provide us runway to conduct more demonstration missions and place additional customer satellites in orbit with the cash on our balance sheet. The future is bright for Momentus, particularly compared to where we sat just a year ago. I'd like to thank our dedicated team for getting us here and would also like to thank our customers and investors for their patience during this period. I'll now hand the mic off to our CFO, Jikun Kim, and then we'll take your questions. Thank you, John. Before I discuss the second quarter financials, I would like to take this opportunity to thank the Momentus team for their hard work and dedication. Turning to slide eight, our second quarter results reflect our ongoing progress and investments toward our future launches. We have cumulatively signed contracts for approximately $55 million in backlog or potential revenue as of July 31st, 2022. The reduction from the $69 million backlog that we reported a quarter ago was driven primarily by a contract cancellation by one of our customers. This customer recently underwent a change in ownership, restructured business model, which reduced its need for satellite transportation services. Recall that our reported backlog includes firm orders as well as options. These options give our customers the flexibility to opt into an available launch slot without requiring a separate agreement. The breadth of these signed contracts span across 22 companies in 16 different countries. In general, our customers have the right to cancel their contracts with the understanding that they will forgo their deposits and milestone payments. If a customer cancels a contract before all the payments are made, the resulting revenue will be less than the full value of the backlog. We ended Q2 with unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $109 million, which we believe should carry us through to the end of 2023, as Jon described. We ended the quarter with approximately $21 million in outstanding gross debt. We paid down approximately $3 million in debt during the quarter. We invested approximately $23 million in operations during Q2, in line with our Q1 burn rate. We recognized $50,000 in revenue and $38,000 in gross profits as our inaugural mission fulfilled a portion of our performance obligations to our customers. In the quarter, we generated approximately $24 million in losses from operations. On a non-GAAP basis, our adjusted EBITDA was a negative $18 million, which is approximately $1 million lower sequentially from Q1. Please refer to the earnings press release issued today for the reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA to GAAP net income. Non-GAAP SG&A expenses for the second quarter totaled approximately $8 million, approximately in line with the prior quarter. Non-GAAP R&D expenses for the second quarter totaled approximately $10 million, approximately $1 million higher from the prior quarter. We ended Q2 with approximately 83.3 million shares outstanding. I will now hand the call back to Darryl Genovesi. Thank you, Jiku n. In a moment, we will move on to the question-and-answer portion of our call. I would like to remind participants that all disclaimers outlined at the onset of this call extend to the question-and-answer session. This includes our disclaimers relating to non-GAAP financial information, forward-looking statements, and the technology underlying our planned service offering. Operator, would you please remind participants how to enter the queue? If you would like to ask a question, press star one on your telephone keypad. Again, if you would like to ask a question, press star one. We'll pause for just a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from a line of Carl Olszewski with Berenberg Research. Hi, John. Can you talk a little bit about how you're tracking schedule-wise for November and if there's any, is there a cushion in the schedule or are there any risk items? Thank you for the question. As we get closer to the November launch, obviously, let me start again and say, right now we're on track to launch in November on the targeted time for the SpaceX Transporter-6 mission. We do have a tight schedule to prepare the Vigoride vehicle for that purpose. We're continuing to do the assembly work and the ground testing on Vigoride-5, which is the next one that we'll launch. As I mentioned, we're manifested and have signed launch services agreements with SpaceX, not only for the Transporter-6 mission currently targeted for November, but for other missions throughout 2023. Similar to where we were with Vigoride-3 a few months ago, again, our schedule to prepare for the next Vigoride vehicle for launch in November is similarly tight. We are working very hard to meet the planned schedule. Our inaugural mission was a learning experience, and we want to use what we learned during that Vigoride-3 mission for our first follow-on mission. We've also had some other hurdles to overcome, including supply chain delays, COVID, which has been problematic for our team this wave and other factors. I do wanna add, if we were to experience an issue that caused us to miss a launch, we would seek to fly again shortly thereafter with the additional agreements we've signed with SpaceX through the end of 2023, which are targeted again for February of 2023, May of 2023, and October of 2023. All in all, I think the main challenge we face is simply you know, a tight schedule and completing the remaining activities on that schedule and to the performance specifications that we have in mind. We are implementing some enhanced ground testing on the Vigoride vehicle and its components to provide some even additional testing beyond the rigorous testing we did for Vigoride -3, to incorporate the lessons learned and to make sure that the corrective actions we've implemented to address the anomalies we experienced on Vigoride -3 are accomplished. We're in the process of executing that. Again, I'm optimistic that we're going to make the launch, but it's a tight schedule. Okay. Thank you very much. You're welcome. Your next question is from the line of James Ratcliffe with Evercore ISI. Hi. Thanks for taking the question. Two, if I could. First of all, can you give us any color about the extended cash runway, if there are any revenue assumptions incorporating that from these upcoming launches? Also, if you're expecting to continue to pay down the term loan as part of that. Second, John, you mentioned government contracts as a potential source of funding for other promising technology efforts that you may be sort of backburnering right now in order to, you know, extend the runway. Can you give us some color on what those would look like or what sort of programs we're talking about? Thanks. Thank you for the good questions. I really appreciate it. First, with respect to the cost reduction plan that we've developed, as I mentioned during the call, we have developed and we're already implementing a plan to reduce our operating costs. Again, with those reductions, our estimate is that the cash currently on our balance sheet should carry us through the end of 2023. We plan to achieve some of these cost reductions by exploiting operational efficiencies, cutting overhead spending, consultant spending, and other types of spending that don't immediately contribute to our upcoming Vigoride demonstration missions. Another portion of our plan to conserve cash and extend our runway, as I mentioned, involves delaying some R&D projects that we previously planned. While our efforts to develop a reusable version of Vigoride will be delayed from our previous plans, we do plan to continue to fund key aspects to keep the project moving, even at a lower burn rate. This is one area where government funding could be very helpful. You asked about our plans with respect to government funding. We have recently focused efforts to begin pursuing that business in earnest. We have submitted some proposals which are, you know, being evaluated by government agencies, and we're identifying other opportunities, and we'll be looking for more of those because we think the capabilities that we bring to the market are a good match for that market as well. Now that we have implemented our National Security Agreement successfully and accomplished retiring our historical regulatory issues, we do believe it's important now to start pursuing this type of business with the government. We continue to believe it's important on the issue of the Vigoride vehicle, we do continue to believe it's important to develop a reusable version of the Vigoride, as this has the potential to reduce our two largest cost items, as I mentioned, the manufacturing cost and the launch cost. Because you're reusing the vehicle several times. This would also allow us to add new revenue streams, like in-orbit refueling, maintenance, and deorbiting. I did want to add that even under our prior plan, reusable Vigoride would not have been available to fly until the middle of the decade. By extending our cash runway, this allows us to focus our resources on our primary goal, which is to incorporate these lessons learned from our inaugural Vigoride mission and ensure that future demonstration missions are productive. You asked whether any of the cost reductions included revenue forecast. I will say for conservatism, the cash runway forecast that the current cash on the Momentus balance sheet should be sufficient to extend through the end of 2023. That runway forecast that we've given you embeds only our forecasted expenditures. We have not embedded any customer milestone payments in the cash flow forecast that we used to estimate our runway. The forecast also excludes any future capital raising activity. We do anticipate some revenue and associated customer milestone payments based on our backlog, but we plan to be opportunistic about raising capital in the future. I'll turn to Jikun Kim here, to our CFO, to add some things. Yeah, James, you asked, I think, about debt repayments and, you know, those expenditures include the continued repayment of our other financial obligations and debt. Just to make sure I understand. Essentially you're looking at the current cash balance lasting till the end of 2023, including debt pay down, but sounds like not assuming any material revenue over that time period. Yes. Well, the revenues are, you know, we do have a forecasted revenue based on our backlog, but we are not assuming any milestone payments from the result of those revenues. Got it. Thank you. Sure. Your next question's from the line of Edison Yu with Deutsche Bank. Hey, a couple of follow-ups. On the solar panel issue, from the way you described it seems it was very mechanical. How comfortable are you, I guess, not only in the issue itself, but I guess the process behind checking things? Because it seems like a relatively simple issue with the supplier that sort of derailed the mission. I'm just curious, you know, do we need to, like, revise any processes to make sure this doesn't happen again? Well, thank you for the good question, Edison. As is common with first flights and new systems in space, we learned a lot during the initial demonstration mission of the Vigoride vehicle, including about the solar panels and their deployment mechanisms. We gathered important insights. We also gathered valuable data from space, both about the things that worked as expected and some other things that did not operate as planned. The solar panels and the associated mechanisms used to deploy or unfurl the deployable solar arrays are made by a third-party supplier, as I mentioned. We're pleased that the body-mounted solar panels that use the same solar cells as the deployable solar arrays operated normally. The solar cells on the outside panels of the deployable solar panels that were exposed to sunlight also operated normally. The solar panels and the deployable arrays on Vigoride-3, including their deployment mechanisms, I want to point out, were tested on the ground dozens of times before the launch. Through close collaboration, though, with the solar panel provider, analysis, and additional verification ground testing, we believe we've identified the root cause of the issues we experienced with those deployable solar arrays during the Vigoride -3 mission, and we've replicated those issues during ground tests. We had an independent review team of space experts analyze the findings of the Momentus engineers, both on this issue with respect to the deployable solar arrays and the entire mission, and they concurred with the findings of our engineering team. I really wanna thank that independent review team, by the way, for the rigorous review that they did and the thoroughness of it. Unfortunately, as you mentioned in your question, there was one component in the mechanisms used to deploy the solar arrays that had an unknown design flaw, and it differed from the test equipment that performed the ground tests on the deployable solar arrays used on Vigoride -3. This is what led to the mechanical issue experienced in space that prevented the deployable solar panels from operating as intended. We believe the specific root cause of that issue with the deployable solar arrays has been addressed, and that specific component has been replaced in the mechanisms on the deployable solar arrays that are being prepared for our next Vigoride mission in November of this year. In addition, as you asked about, we have developed a set of enhanced test procedures. We've installed a sophisticated new test structure, test structures at Momentus headquarters and are working closely with the supplier of those deployable solar arrays to implement an even more extensive ground test campaign for the solar array that are going to be used on our future Vigoride missions. This is just another area where we're going to implement the lessons learned and with this idea of continuous improvement to be an even more effective space company. Appreciate the color. Separately, wanted to follow up on the government contract comments. Are there any specific programs either from NASA or DoD that could be leveraged here? I know some of the launch companies, the launch startups go after these venture class kind of missions. Is there anything you could kind of point us toward that already, you know, could be a potential source of funding? Well, we have been looking at opportunities both at NASA and the Department of Defense organizations because we do think our technology would support these important missions to our government customers. In particular, NASA has a series of different solicitations. You mentioned one of them, venture class. As an example, we submitted a bid for the NASA Tipping Point proposals. The philosophy behind the NASA Tipping Point proposals is bidders are encouraged to come forward to NASA with ideas that could both have an application for NASA and are something that could be commercialized. That's one that we've submitted a proposal for. It's under evaluation. We've also submitted other bids for NASA contracts under something called the VADR contract vehicle, V-A-D-R, with a partner company. We're also pursuing some DoD and Space Development Agency opportunities, and we're looking at other opportunities across the Department of Defense and plan to, in the future, begin bidding those as well. As you know, these solicitations and opportunities take some time to develop, and so we're beginning to put those into our cycle and our system to pursue those. Because again, I think that, given the progress we've made implementing our National Security Agreement and retiring our historical regulatory issues, I think we're now in a position to pursue this sort of opportunity set in earnest and are eager to do so. Because for our technology development, we think there's a nice overlap between our aims in the commercial world and supporting the needs of these government customers. Understood. Last one for me, just a little bit of housekeeping. On the revenue, I guess, for the remaining satellites, any sort of rough guidance you can give there? I know it's not necessarily a material amount, but just how to think about the remaining satellites. On the overhead reduction, the cost reductions, should we think about that coming basically from OpEx? On the revenue recognition, you know, again, we don't guide, but it's not unrealistic to think about $200K next quarter. From a cost reduction standpoint, yes, it'll see it on SG&A as well as R&D expenditures. Again, you know, our focus is on maintaining our ability to fly V-5, V-6, and V-7. Then, you know, the cost won't immediately decline today, but shortly thereafter, we're expecting a reduction. Great. Thanks a lot. Sure. As a reminder, to ask a question, press star one on your telephone keypad. Your next question is from the line of Colin Canfield with Barclays. Hey, good afternoon. Can you update us on what level of mission cadence or asset utilization you need to see before you can generate cash? Sure. Thank you for the good question. Our plans right now, as Jikun Kim, our CFO mentioned, I wanted to answer part of the last question and yours with the same portion, which is our cost reduction activities preserve fully our ability to produce, assemble, test, ship to the launch base, and add enhanced test procedures for Vigoride- 5, Vigoride-6, and Vigoride-7. That's why you'll begin seeing additional cost reductions following those launches. Now, you asked about the launch cadence. Those three launches are targeted to occur on SpaceX Transporter rideshare missions. The next one, Transporter- 6, is in November. That's the target date from SpaceX. The next one after that is targeted for February 2023. The following one after that is targeted for May 2023. There's another one that we have signed a launch services agreement or a contract for, to reserve space for October 2023. We have signed contracts, launch service agreements with SpaceX for these next four transporter missions that occur on roughly three- to four-month cycles, as I mentioned. Consistent with our strategy, our focus has been to bring Vigoride to market as early as possible with the features and reliability we know our customers need. We're pleased with the success that this deliberate and disciplined approach has brought us. We plan on continuing with it to make progress both operationally and financially. Again, we estimate that based on the planned cost reductions that we're implementing, using the cash currently on our balance sheet, we should be able to extend the runway through the end of 2023, which will fund the cadence that I described for you. We've sized our cost reductions so that our next three missions can be fully funded with the cash on our balance sheet, meaning Vigoride-5 this fall, followed by Vigoride-6 and Vigoride-7 in early 2023. Getting these three missions right over the next 10 months is the highest priority for our company within the framework of our available cash. We do expect customer order activity to pick up once we establish flight heritage, but there will be some lag between when we receive those orders to recognizing revenues and ultimately profits, of course. Got it. Is there a level of commercial new company starts that you're tracking that can kind of point to like? Obviously we know where government budgets are at and sort of level of launch contract money that's available and mission contract money that's available. Maybe if you could just talk about how rising rates and kind of the space funding environment is interacting with some of the more, you know, smaller satellite constellations that come from commercial users. Well, we're continuing to see a pretty robust number of players in the small satellite market. As a matter of fact, when you visit a number of these industry conferences or begin to see the diversity of ideas and ways that these innovative companies are thinking about, not only doing new things in space in different ways, but also how, because of, you know, kind of a confluence of a couple of major events, which is the decline in launch costs, which used to be a huge barrier to entry for most players, and then the ability to make very small satellites very capable in ways that the technology didn't allow for before. Because it's much less expensive per kilogram to put your satellite in orbit, and you can do much more with a much smaller satellite, it's very interesting to see. For example, there's a large small sat conference underway as we speak in Utah, where we're seeing a lot of customer activity there. I do think that even in this, you know, tougher market, you're still seeing quite a few entrants and a robust amount of activity. Now, you asked about, Is there any way to quantify that? Sorry. Please go ahead. Sorry. Well, yeah, if you could quantify that, like the number of new starts you're seeing or new constellations you're seeing and you mentioned it's a troubled environment, so I just wanted to make sure we kinda have a good sense. We look at a number of these industry forecasts to do that. I'd say, you know, we continue to see customer opportunities in the commercial space as well as government that we're bidding on. We do think our service offering aligns very well with these customers' plans in the new space economy. In terms of the quantification, in our 10-K, you can see there's a number of third-party market forecasts that indicate the total addressable market for space transportation is growing and will continue to do so. We don't perform independent market analyses like that. We have been using several of the ones that are available. There was a recent report, for example, by the Space Foundation that gave a, you know, an analysis of the upcoming markets. There was an excellent one I read, as well from McKinsey at the World Economic Forum. Northern Sky Research is another company that we've looked at, and there are more. We don't independently generate these broad market analyses. We're utilizing third parties for that service. Got it. Thanks for the color. At this time, there are no further questions. I'll hand the call back over to the presenters for any closing remarks. Thank you for your participation. Have a nice day. This concludes today's call. You may now disconnect your line.