Good morning, and welcome to the MidWestOne Financial Group Inc. second quarter 2021 earnings call. This presentation contains forward-looking statements relating to the financial condition, results of operations, and business of MidWestOne Financial Group Inc. Forward-looking statements generally include words such as believe, expect, anticipate, and other similar expressions. Actual results could differ materially from those indicated. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are interest rates, changes in the mix of the company's business, competitive pressures, general economic conditions, and the risk factors detailed in the company's periodic reports and registration statements filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. MidWestOne Financial Group Inc. undertakes no obligation to publicly revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this presentation. I would now like to turn the conference over to Charlie Funk, Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead. Thank you very much, Eily, and we welcome everyone and thank you for joining us this morning or afternoon if you're in the Eastern Time Zone. I would say that I am joined today by Gary Sims, our Chief Credit Officer, Barry Ray, our Chief Financial Officer, Jim Cantrell, our Chief Investment Officer, and Len Devaisher, the President of the company. I would make a few introductory comments and just say that overall, it was really an interesting quarter and certainly a good quarter financially. I think one of the highlights of the quarter is that we're beginning to see just a few green shoots in terms of loan demand in our footprint. A few other general comments. We did have continued decent deposit generation, although the period-to-period numbers are pretty flat. I think that's due to a few very large temporary deposits that were parked in the bank on 3/31 that left during the quarter. Very pleased to report that asset quality is stable to improving, and I think we have positive momentum in terms of asset quality in our company. Net interest margin remains a challenge for us, and I think a challenge for our industry, not just MidWestOne. In terms of capital, we feel very good about the tangible common equity ratio back near 8%, and I would remind all of our listeners that for many years, more than a decade, our target for tangible common equity has been in the 8%-8.5% range. We're very comfortable with where we stand right now. Specifically, talk just a little bit about the balance sheet and say that the PPP forgiveness has ramped- up the past 45 days or so. Ex-PPP, as we put in the earnings release, our loan totals grew 2.2% in the linked quarter. The primary producers of the growth in our loan portfolio came from Denver and from the Twin Cities, although we do see positive momentum out of our Iowa City market as well as our Southwest Florida market, and would also say that line usage on our lines of credit continues to be in the low 30% range, and normally at this time of the year, it would probably be in the mid-40%s. Down about a third, we really don't see that changing in the near term. We will continue to watch that and report on it as we are able. Competition for good loans, I would categorize as brutal. There's a lot of stretching and as one noted economist said this week, stooping for yield. We are seeing rates quoted in the twos for out to five years and occasionally longer than five years in the high twos. We don't see a lot of compromise on asset quality, perhaps a little bit, but not a lot. I think most of the competition right now is in the rate category, and that really does make it tough on maintaining a good margin. We are competing when we feel that we need to. In the ag space, as we've said on past calls, Farm Credit Services remains a very, very strong competitor, offering long-term fixed rates in the twos, and it's very, very difficult to compete with that. Overall, we are still seeing paydowns in our footprint, not in one region or another, but there are paydowns, and most of the paydowns seem to be coming from sale of businesses. We see a little bit of that continuing into the third quarter. In terms of our loan pipeline for the third quarter, I would say that it's not robust, but it's not sparse. I'd call it a reasonable pipeline, and we're off to a good start in July in terms of loan production. Our deposits, as I said, were flat 3/31 to 6/30, but again, that's reflective of a few very large ones on our balance sheet at 3/31 that left during the quarter, and we continue to actively pursue good core deposit customers throughout our footprint. In terms of the net interest margin, as stated, the margin's a challenge, and I think it will continue to be a challenge in this rate environment. Loan growth can help mitigate some of the pressure on the net interest margin, and PPP fees will continue to flow in the next two quarters, which also helps greatly. What we need, in addition to loan growth, is a steeper yield curve in the three-month to five-year area of the yield curve. That is not a new comment. I've made that comment on prior calls. We did proactively sell a number of long-duration bonds at the end of the quarter. We did this for a couple of reasons. We did it to increase asset sensitivity as well as open room for slightly longer duration loans on our balance sheet when we feel that's appropriate. There really wasn't a large gain or loss. Some bonds were sold at a gain, some at a loss. We did that out of an abundance of caution and really taking a proactive approach to interest rate risk management. Turning to non-interest income, very, very pleased with our home mortgage center and the company. It continues to be strong. You did see a little slowing in the revenue. What's interesting about the flattish or slightly declining mortgage revenue is that the volume of mortgage loans originated was about the same, but the gain on sale was less because that reflects narrower margins on gain and sale as competition has increased in the mortgage market as well. In past calls, I've given a call out to our Dubuque and Dyersville, Iowa locations, which were part of the former AT. They continue to do an excellent job of mortgage production, and that is about 50% of our mortgage production year- to- date. We expect good results going forward from mortgage, probably not at the booming levels that we've seen in Q4 2020 and Q1 2021. I think mortgage should hang in there for at least another quarter, and we feel pretty good about where we are there. Also, wealth management, a very good story in our company. Our investment services area, which is comprised of LPL registered representatives just continues to hit the ball out of the park in terms of their results. We did add a new investment representative in Southwest Florida, and that's the first time in our company we've been able to have an investment rep in that part of our footprint. You will also remember that we did hire a group of trust bankers in Minnesota, and they've been working in the Twin Cities market. They continue to gain momentum, and I think a year from now, what you will see is a significant amount of assets under management. They've just come into our company and really done a nice job. Overall, our trust department continues to produce consistent growth and really a key component of our non-interest income in our company. Also, a positive trend in card revenue, which is nice to see. I think that was a little bit unexpected, but we'll take it, and we continue to see momentum there as well. What we would love to see in non-interest income is a better and more favorable market for interest rate swaps that we could offer to our loan customers, but we just don't have the market for that right now, at least the way we see it. In terms of non-interest expense, very few comments here. There were some one-time adjustments in the salaries and benefits line item, but we feel okay about where non-interest expense is at this particular point in time. Turning to asset quality, again, as I said in the opening comments, a good story. NPAs are coming down slowly, but the trend is good. We had minimal charge-offs again this quarter. In the ag portfolio, ag continues to diminish a little bit as a percentage of our portfolio. It's a little over 7% of our portfolio right now. The ag portfolio is in pretty good shape because prices have been good for soybeans, for dairy, and for corn. Probably the only thing that we keep an eye on is that in some parts of our footprint, especially the northern part of our footprint in Iowa, lack of rainfall has gotten to be a problem, although we did get a good rain in the last week or so. Some parts of our footprint look just extremely good in terms of crops. I think the outlook for this year is pretty good in terms of our agricultural portfolio. If you look at the watch and substandard in our ag portfolio, it's down nicely from a year ago, and we expect that trend to continue. I jotted down four reasons why I think that ag loans have been a struggle in terms of growing the portfolio. The first one is we've worked out some problem credits, which diminishes the outstandings. Second reason, not unlike commercial banking, is that PPP funds were made available to the ag borrowers in the second round of PPP, and we did over $10.5 million of PPP loans to our ag customers. What that means is fewer draws on their credit lines, on their working capital lines. We also see some balances that remain from insurance proceeds last year from the 2020 derecho. Of course, Farm Credit Services continues to be a strong competitor. Overall, the reserve release reflects our continuing confidence in asset quality and that we think the outlook for the next few quarters and beyond is an improving outlook. That's the main reason for the reserve release. In terms of capital, we've been active repurchasers, and especially in the last 30 days, have been active repurchasers, and we remain adamant that MidWestOne Financial Group stock is a compelling value. Tangible common equity is 7.86% at quarter- end, and would also note that our tangible book value per share climbed to $27.90 per share. Overall, a good performance. We need to continue to show loan growth, and we need to continue to manage the heck out of the net interest margin. I think those are the two biggest challenges that we have for the quarters ahead. With that, Eily, I think we're all ready for Q&A, and I will turn it back to you. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. To ask a question you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you are using speaker phone please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your questions please press star then two. Our first question today will come from Brendan Nosal with Piper Sandler. Hey, good morning, everybody. Good morning, Brendan. Good morning, Brendan. Charlie, I appreciate your comments on liquidity flows during the quarter and the fact that period- end deposits probably mask what's still going on, given some movement there with the larger. Could you expand a little bit on the pace of liquidity flows that you continue to see and whether or not they've slowed down a little bit or are continuing at these record levels? Brendan, this is Jim. I guess I'll start. Charlie was right. I think we did see some fairly large balance deposits run out in the month. My sense is that as I look at the second quarter, we probably hit close to our peak. We're down off the peak as we end the quarter, down off the peak of our total deposit balances. We're just not seeing the pace of growth that we were seeing through the prior four or five quarters. My sense is that deposit growth, while not negative, it's slowed down considerably here in the latter part of the second quarter and now moving into the third quarter. Okay, great. That's helpful. Then maybe on a related note, if liquidity flows are indeed slowing down or stopping entirely, I feel like that's been one of the largest variables for the margin over the past couple of quarters coupled with one of the worst rate environments imaginable. Just given the liquidity flows are slowing, any thoughts on your ability to defend the margin from this point? Or without a steeper curve, is there going to be a bit of a further grind down? Yeah. Well, a steeper curve would certainly help. What we've had happen to the yield curve in the last three or four weeks probably is not a positive for the margin because we've had curve flattening over that period. As I see the mix, a couple of things are going on. One, we will have some PPP forgiveness still remaining. I think there were $184 million worth of PPP loans on the books at the end of the quarter. What we've seen over the last month or month and a half is that as those loans have been forgiven, they've been replaced with either shrinking the wholesale funding side or with loans coming on the books. Over the last 45 days to two months, we really haven't been in a position where we've had to buy any new securities, which has been somewhat of a luxury. The last major purchase we did was probably at the beginning of the second quarter in April. If that trend holds where we don't have to add to the securities portfolio and we see that the PPP loan forgiveness is going to be replaced with regular loan production, then I think we have a good chance of defending the margin. All right. Fantastic. Thank you for taking the questions. Thank you, Brendan. Our next question comes from Jeff Rulis with D.A. Davidson. Hey, Jeff. Thanks. Good morning. Morning. Charlie, you spoke on the buyback appetite. Sounds like that's going to be a tool that you continue to use. Particularly, you stepped up of late. Just circling back to kind of M&A. You've been on the sidelines for a bit, and just kind of revisit where you sit on capital allocation and the opportunities that you see. We think right now buying back our stock is a very good use of our capital, especially at these levels. Even slightly higher levels, we still think it's a very good investment for our shareholders. We're aware of M&A opportunities. We've looked at a number this year. We also have to understand what we're able to pay for as a company that would benefit our shareholders. If we find opportunities, and there may be some that would be of benefit to our shareholders, we certainly would pursue them, and we think we have the means to do so. Okay. Charlie, on the loan pipeline that you mentioned, they're reasonable, I suppose. You also talked about some pay downs. I'm trying to peg where you are. It sounds like more of an optimistic tone as things reopen. Just getting a sense for your expectations. Is it safe to say that you're slightly less maybe defensively minded on credit, if that's more comfortable and just expectations, I guess, kind of second half of the year and maybe into 2022 on growth? Are we approaching a mid-single digit expectation or not quite there yet, given still pretty brutal competition, as you said? I think, well, we can compete, and we're certainly willing to compete on price. We're not willing to compete by stretching credit terms too far. I think mid-single digits would seem kind of high to me, but I think the expectation here is that we would continue to grow our loan portfolio at a measured pace. The 30% line usage doesn't help us. I know others are experiencing the same thing. When folks sell their businesses, that doesn't help us. We've got some things in the pipeline, and I think it probably depends more on pay downs than it does on production, because I think we're going to be able to produce based on what I see in the pipeline. Okay. I hope that helps, Jeff. I think we're all kind of dealing with businesses flush with cash and how this sort of unwinds, helpful to have some additional color. I did have one last one for maybe Gary. The tax rate kind of 21%-22%, is the expectation that we're kind of hugging in the middle of that range. What do you think the rate is going to drop at? Yeah. I would utilize something around that for the full year. Yeah. Okay. That's it for me. Thanks. Thank you, Jeff. Our next question comes from Terry McEvoy with Stephens. Hi, good morning, everyone. Hello, Terry. Good morning. I've got a question on the non-PPP commercial loan growth. I know you mentioned Denver and Twin Cities as two markets that kind of stood out. I was hoping you could maybe just expand on the green shoots that you were seeing. Were there any consistent themes among those borrowers in the second quarter? Just kind of layering in, when the PPP loan is forgiven, what are those customers doing? Are they then having conversations with you about their lending relationship, and are they an area of growth going forward? I'll let our President, Len, take the first crack at that, and Gary may want to weigh in following. Thanks, Charlie. Yeah. In response to, Terry, your second question about when the loans are forgiven. One of the things that is a core part of our process as a relationship-focused bank is, of course, spending time with those customers and coming alongside them as they look forward and look ahead. To our point earlier about the line usage, right? We see that PPP for those dollars as a major pressure point on line usage. But we, as customers, depending on where they're situated and where their outlook is, we're obviously coming alongside them to talk about how we can participate in helping them grow their business. Yeah, that's a very active part of the PPP forgiveness process. With respect to themes of the loan growth and so forth, the thing that I'm encouraged by is that there's a fair amount of diversity across not only the markets because both Twin Cities, Colorado, Florida, and Iowa City, but also in terms of the types of deals that we're seeing. There's certainly CRE deals and so forth, but I also see some nonprofit opportunities in those numbers. I see a nice kind of mix where we're not running the risk of any kind of concentration there. That part feels good to me, and that's what I see on the pipeline as well. Thanks for that. Terry, I think Gary may have something to add. Perfect Gary. Terry, I was going to just reinforce what Len is saying and seeing in the marketplace. I think a general theme that I'm seeing from the credit side is that the activity around utilization of capital is increasing. In other words, people are getting off the sidelines and starting to make decisions about deploying capital. It's really happening on both the buy side and the sell side. I think that's really what Charlie was saying earlier relative to the pay downs could add pressure to our loan growth. I think that's what's driving that is we have customers that are making sell decisions, and we have customers that are making buy decisions. It's really increasing the activity in the marketplace. Thank you both for that. Just as a follow-up, on the mortgage business, in the release, it said it's still operating above normal. I'm just wondering, on a quarterly run- rate basis, is normal something closer to, call it, $2 million? If that's the case, how do I think about the expense adjustment in a lower mortgage revenue environment? Yeah, if we look back, this is Barry, Terry. With respect to gain on sale dollars, I would say, maybe I go back to the second quarter of last year, for example, $2 million would have been the rate about where we were running. Add on top of that, the servicing income, obviously a big wild card is the servicing rights adjustment. Most of the costs associated with our mortgage business, there is a variable nature to it that you're alluding to, I would probably reduce that cost pro rata with respect to any reduction that you make in the revenue. Thank you, Barry. Our next question comes from Damon DelMonte with KBW. Hey, good morning, everyone. Hope everybody's doing well today. Hi Damon. Good morning, Damon. My first question, kind of looking at the credit trends, obviously continuing to do quite well there and reflective with the second quarter in a row of a provision recapture. How should we think about the back half of the year? Do you think that the reserve is adequate enough where you could see further release given these trends continuing? Hey, Damon, Gary here. I'll start to answer that question as well. What you're seeing in the portfolio and even more specifically in the reserve is really the culmination of how we've been proactive in managing our portfolio through the pandemic. You monitored with us as we increased criticized and classifieds and NPA previously, and really that proactiveness has created the resolutions that you're seeing today and the positive trends that you're seeing today. All of that is resulting in the provision releases that you're seeing today. As Charlie was saying earlier, I think you're going to continue to see the positive trends in the assets and the credit portfolio, and that will create, I'm going to call it a bias towards continuing to moderate our reserve on a go-forward basis. Okay. That's helpful. Thank you. I guess just a quick question here on expenses, probably for Barry. You guys, from the commentary, I take it you're kind of comfortable here in this upper $28 million range is a good run- rate going forward? Yeah, Damon, this is Barry. Yeah, there were, as Charlie alluded to, there were a few puts and takes, but I think the range that we had for this particular quarter on our expense run- rate is a fairly good representation of what we think near term run- rate can be. Okay, great. That's all that I had. Thanks a lot, guys. Appreciate it. Thank you, Damon. Thanks, Damon. If you have further questions, please press star one to join our queue. Our next question comes from Brian Martin with Janney Montgomery. Hey, good morning. Hi, Brian. Hi, Brian. Good morning Brian. Hey, guys, just wanted to ask you just maybe Jim, back to the core margin for a minute. I guess, just given your comments about the origination volume replacement that the PPP and holding the margin. I guess, given Charlie's comments about the pipeline, I guess would your expectation be that kind of based on what the current pipeline looks like, that that's possible? I guess or is it that maybe volume's not enough? If that volume is not enough, I guess you could see a little drift lower on the core margin, kind of ex the PPP and accretion number. I think you've hit on the mechanics of it. I think you're right. They could drift a little lower. Like I said, we have $184 million of PPP unforgiven loans on the balance sheet as of the end of the quarter. Depending on the pace of those, and we will spend some money to pay off some wholesale funding along the way, but unfortunately, there's not a lot of wholesale funding. It's maybe $10 million or $15 million a quarter is what we've got left. We'll spend some money on that, and we'll spend some money on loan production, and to the extent it's offset by that PPP forgiveness, it's kind of a balancing act. It is certainly possible that PPP forgiveness outruns loan production. As I said, for the last 45 days to two months, it's been pretty even. That's sort of what I'm basing my forecast on is what we've seen over the last couple of months. Gotcha. Okay. I'm not sure for who on the PPP, appreciate the commentary about the pickup here. Should we think about the remaining fees and the forgiveness, kind of the bulk of that occurs in the second half here that the remaining fees are all collected here? Is that fair to think about based on the pace of activity and what you're seeing currently, or you think there's still some bleed into next year? Brian, this is Barry. The fact pattern that you just outlined is kind of what we would expect, I would say. However, it's very difficult for us to triangulate on the timing of what the SBA is going to do. For example, I would say the PPP round one forgiveness slowed down whenever they had PPP round two, and so there could be uncertainty in the timing. We expect the latter half of this year to be a larger volume of PPP forgiveness than perhaps completely, but it could very well be some amount that trickles into 2022. Yeah, that's fair. That's fair, Brian. This is Gary. Most, but probably not all in the latter half. Yeah. Okay, perfect. I don't know if this is maybe for Barry. Just that comment earlier about just kind of the income, kind of the level of mortgage is core. Just when you think about if mortgage does normalize, but to Charlie's point about maybe the wealth side getting some benefit from the people you've hired. Is it fair to think about a $9 million type of run- rate as kind of where we think about fees are as you kind of normalize maybe after next quarter with mortgage and then building from there? Is that fair, Barry? Yeah, the range that I have in my mind, Brian, for the fee income in total is about $8.5 million to $9.5 million in the near term Okay. what I'm thinking. Got you. Okay. Just remind me, Barry, the remaining accretion to bring through, where does that stand today? I think the amount this quarter was $800,000 or $900,000. Oh, for the loan purchase discount? Yeah. Yeah, June 30th, Brian, that was $7 million, is what's left. Okay. Just remind me the timing of how you think that plays out, I guess. I think it's going to play out similarly to what we've observed with respect to the notion of the quarterly accretion is recognized more upfront, and we've seen that fact pattern play out. The amount that we recognized this quarter, which, yeah, I think it was, what, $800,000 or so. I anticipate that future quarters will be that and then lower. Got you. Okay, perfect. That's all I have. Thanks for taking my questions. Yeah. Thank you, Brian. This concludes our question- and- answer session. I'd like to turn the call back over to Charlie Funk for any closing remarks. Thanks to everyone who joined us this morning. For those who need further clarification on the earnings release, please contact any one of us and we'll be responsive to your inquiries. With that, we wish everyone a good day and a good weekend, and back to you, Eily. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.