Good day, and welcome to the Inari Medical, Inc. Q3 2022 Earnings Conference Call. All participants will be in listen only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a Conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on a touchtone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note today's event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the Conference over to Caroline Corner, Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, Operator. Welcome to Inari's Q3 2022 Earnings Call. Joining me on today's call are Bill Hoffman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Drew Hykes, Chief Operating Officer, and Mitch Hill, Chief Financial Officer. This call will include forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements made on this call that do not relate to matters of historical fact should be considered forward-looking statements, including statements regarding the markets in which Inari operates, trends and expectations for Inari's products and technology, trends and demands for Inari's products, Inari's expected financial performance, expenses, and position in the market, and the impact of COVID-19 on Inari's operations and Inari's customers' operations. These statements are neither promises nor guarantees and involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from any results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Please review Inari's most recent filings with the SEC, particularly the risk factors described in Inari's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31st, 2021 for additional information. Any forward-looking statements provided during this call, including projections for future performance, are based on management's expectations as of today. Inari undertakes no obligation to update these statements except as required by applicable law. Inari's press release for Q3 2022 results is available on Inari's website, www.inarimedical.com, under the Investors section, and includes additional details about Inari's financial results. Inari's website also has the latest SEC filings, which you are encouraged to review. A recording of today's call will be available on Inari's website by 5:00 P.M. Pacific Time today. Now I'd like to turn the call over to Bill for his comments on Q3 2022 business highlights. Thank you, Caroline, and thank you everyone for joining us today. Our Q3 was perhaps the most productive in our history as a public company. Revenue growth was again strong, and we executed crisply across all of our growth drivers. In fact, since our last Earnings Call, we obtained FDA clearance on three new products, two of which are already in full market release. We reported three new important data readouts in late-breaking clinical trial presentations at major medical conferences, TCT and VIVA. Drew will share some detail about all of this shortly, but we'd like to start now, as we always do, with a patient story. In fact, we're going to share three short patient stories, one for each of our new products. A couple of months ago, a 58-year-old man in otherwise good health presented to a hospital in Florida with severely swollen legs and in horrible pain. He was diagnosed with a critical limb-threatening condition called Critical Limb Ischemia, caused by blood clots in the arteries of his leg. He had been treated for the same condition a few months earlier via an open surgical resection, and in fact had just endured two days in the ICU on a Thrombolytic drip, followed by an Endovascular thrombectomy procedure in which a competitive product failed to remove his blood clot. He was treated with the new Inari Artix system, and in less than 60 minutes, his pain was gone, and his legs returned to normal size, and was discharged from the hospital the very next day. In September, a new mom, just 26 years old and two months postpartum, presented to an emergency department in Arkansas with severely swollen legs and in significant pain. Because she had a history of blood clotting disorders, physicians had placed several years earlier a vena cava filter to prevent a Pulmonary embolism. That filter was now full of clot, which extended from just below her chest to her knees on both legs. The new Inari ProTrieve sheath was delivered from her neck to just below her heart to ensure no clot embolized to her lungs, while multiple Inari devices were used to remove all of the massive amount of clot in her abdomen, pelvis, and legs. She was home the very next day with her new baby. Finally, also in September, a man in his 80s with a history of chronic knee pain and a history of surgeries reported progressive and significantly worsening symptoms of pain and swelling in both legs. He had been treated only with anticoagulation for multiple diagnoses of DVT over many years and was now suffering from chronic clots extending from his pelvis to his ankles. The physician used ClotTriever BOLD to remove all of the clot above his knees and the new Inari InThrill device to remove the clot below his knees. Total Inari device time on this complex procedure was just 31 minutes. He was discharged from the hospital a couple of days later with greatly diminished pain and no remaining swelling in his legs. None of these procedures were possible just a few months ago, and in fact, two of these patients had already failed multiple treatment attempts with other therapies. These patients matter to us very much. Every patient has a history, a story, a life, people who care about them. We are committed above all to changing lives in the most beautiful ways. We are just getting started. I'd like now to turn the call over to Drew Hykes, who will, by the time you hear formally from him again, be our next Chief Executive Officer. Thanks, Bill. I'd like to start with a brief summary of our financial performance. Our revenue in Q3 was $96.2 million, up $23.3 million or 32% from the same quarter last year. Results in our core business were driven by strong procedural growth across both ClotTriever and FlowTriever product lines. On a sequential basis, procedure growth during the quarter was more than enough to offset the revenue contributions we saw in Q2 from the introduction of BOLD and Intri24. We are pleased with how our business performed in Q3 and enthusiastic about how we are positioned for both the remainder of this year as well as 2023. With that, I'll now turn to our growth drivers. Our first growth driver is the expansion of our sales organization. You will recall that we committed to at least 275 territories by the end of 2022. In Q2, we hired our largest sales class ever, nearly achieving this goal by mid-year. We accelerated our hiring in anticipation of introducing several new products in the second half of the year. In Q3, we intentionally hired a smaller group and exited the quarter with just over 275 territories. We continue to believe, when fully built out, our sales organization will rival the largest in the interventional space. We still have a long way to go. Continued expansion of our sales organization results in smaller and smaller territories. This positions us well to execute on our second growth driver, which is increasing penetration in existing accounts. Despite our commercial success, the vast majority of VT patients continue to be treated with anticoagulation alone and never even see a physician with the skills and expertise to make the most informed clinical decisions. Our goal is to establish systems and processes similar to stroke and MI that ensure patients are consistently identified, screened, and evaluated by a VT expert. Our VT Excellence program is a comprehensive and repeatable approach to connecting VT patients to VT experts. We have invested heavily in this effort, and we believe it is paying off. We are systematically moving customers to the most advanced stage of VT excellence, and TAM penetration rates at these centers are several times greater than our median customer. Our third growth driver is to build upon our base of clinical evidence. The past several months have been the most productive in our history in terms of both the quantity and quality of data produced. First, outcomes from the full U.S. cohort of the FLASH registry were presented as a late-breaking clinical trial at TCT in September. FLASH is the largest device study ever conducted in the field of PE, enrolling 800 patients across 50 centers. The study evaluated real-world patient outcomes after treatment of PE with FlowTriever. Once again, the safety profile was pristine. The major adverse event rate was just 1.8% and not a single device-related major adverse event was reported. Efficacy was also unmatched. Many patients showed meaningful hemodynamic improvements while still on the cath lab table. This again confirms what patients consistently report: they feel better immediately. Most importantly, all-cause mortality at 30 days was only 0.8%, which is extraordinary given the 10% mortality consistently seen in updates to the PERT all-comer registry of almost 6,000 patients. These results are unprecedented in PE thrombectomy. Rapid thrombus extraction with FlowTriever is not only safer than conservative medical management, it fundamentally alters the natural course of the disease. Next, 30-day outcomes from the fully enrolled 500-patient all-comer CLOUT registry were presented as a late-breaking clinical trial earlier this week at VIVA and The VEINS. CLOUT is the largest mechanical thrombectomy study ever conducted on DVT patients. ClotTriever again demonstrated an excellent safety profile, with just one patient experiencing a device-related serious adverse event. Efficacy was unparalleled. Independent core lab adjudication showed complete or near complete thrombus extraction in 90% of patients. In fact, nearly two-thirds of patients showed 100% clot removal, which has never been demonstrated in any DVT trial ever. Not surprisingly, patients experienced immediate symptom relief. More than 90% were free of moderate and severe post-thrombotic syndrome at 30 days. Removing all of the clot matters. Also presented as a late breaker at VIVA and The VEINS was a propensity match comparison of patients treated in the CLOUT registry versus patients treated with pharmacomechanical thrombectomy in the landmark NIH-sponsored ATTRACT trial. Nearly twice as many CLOUT patients showed complete clot removal compared to ATTRACT patients who were treated with competitive technology. Complete clot clearance improves patient outcomes. Not surprisingly then, CLOUT patients showed significantly lower rates of PTS compared to ATTRACT patients. The three key takeaways from these DVT studies are, first, ClotTriever is safe. Second, ClotTriever removes more clot than any device ever studied. Third, ClotTriever achieves best-in-class patient outcomes. This gives us great confidence that DEFIANCE, our randomized controlled trial, will establish ClotTriever as standard of care for DVT treatment. Enrollment begins in Q1 2023. Finally, we are excited to update you on PEERLESS. PEERLESS, you will recall, is our 550-patient RCT comparing FlowTriever to catheter-directed lytic therapy for the treatment of PE patients. Study sites continue to activate and enrollment is well ahead of our expectations. We will update you periodically on both PEERLESS and DEFIANCE. We remain committed to the production of high quality data and a lot of it. This commitment is based on a sense of responsibility to physicians and patients, and we believe the implications will be increasingly clear, not only for adoption and growth, but also for differentiation from current and future competitors. Our fourth growth driver is to expand our product portfolio. We have several exciting developments to share here as well. First, ProTrieve has now transitioned to a full market release. The device is a sheath that provides protection to the heart and lungs during complex DVT and IVC procedures. This is important not only in at least 15% of our own procedures, but useful in a large percentage of DVT interventions completed with other devices. Physician feedback has been highly positive. ProTrieve will be sold outside of our per procedure pricing and carries an average selling price of $4,000. It represents a significant potential revenue opportunity. InThrill is also now in full market release. InThrill is a thrombectomy system designed for small vessels, including AV fistulas and veins in the upper extremity and below the knee. We believe the combined total addressable market is 250, 000 to 300,000 procedures per year in the U.S. alone. At an ASP of $4,000, InThrill represents an additional $1 billion market opportunity. Artix continues to perform well in limited market release. The system combines both aspiration and mechanical thrombectomy to treat peripheral arterial thrombosis. The system was designed to achieve complete clot removal while minimizing the risk of distal embolization. We estimate the annual incidence of peripheral arterial thrombosis in the U.S. is approximately 80,000 cases. With a target ASP of $7,500, Artix represents an incremental market opportunity of $600 million. We will share additional updates on Artix as we progress through the remainder of the LMR. In summary, during 2021, we launched five major new products. To date in 2022, we have launched six new products, including solutions to address three new TAMs. As a result, our total TAM has increased from $5.8 billion to over $8 billion in the U.S. and over $20 billion globally. Our pipeline is full and we look forward to sharing additional new product releases soon. Our last growth driver is expansion into international markets. Q3 marked another quarter of record case and revenue growth for our OUS business, driven by continued adoption in Europe. We have established an initial commercial footprint across the entire European market and are largely following the same playbook and commercial system as our U.S. business. Beyond Europe, we also saw strong case growth during the quarter in our existing markets in Latin America, Canada, and Asia Pacific. We are continuing to work towards additional market launches across these regions during the remainder of this year and into 2023. Despite this progress, as we've noted previously, international will not be a material component of our overall revenue mix for the near term. Taken together, we believe we are making excellent progress across all our growth drivers. Our strategy is working, and we believe we can and will grow consistently for many quarters and years to come. Despite all our progress, make no mistake, we are just getting started. With that, I'd like to turn things over to Mitch. Thank you, Drew, and good afternoon, everyone. Inari revenues for the Q3 of 2022 were $96.2 million, up $23.3 million or 32% from $72.9 million for the same period of prior year. Compared to Q3 of 2021, our revenue growth was due to continued efforts to open new customer accounts, expand our sales force, and deepen our relationship with existing customers. We've also been successful introducing multiple new products to expand both the FlowTriever and ClotTriever product lines. The revenue split between product lines was substantially the same year-over-year, with 31% of our revenue derived from the sale of ClotTriever products during the Q3 of 2022 versus 30% in 2021, and 69% derived from the sale of FlowTriever compared to 70% in 2021. Gross margin was 88.5% for the Q3 of 2022, compared with 90.3% for the Q3 of 2021. The decline was primarily due to the addition of new products to our FlowTriever toolkit, which add additional cost of goods sold due to our per procedure pricing approach. Operating expenses were $94.9 million in the Q3 of 2022, compared with $68.6 million for the same period of the prior year. R&D expense was $19.1 million in the Q3, compared with $12.5 million for the same period of 2021. The $6.6 million increase in R&D expense was primarily driven by an increase in headcount, as well as product development and clinical evidence development costs. These initiatives are consistent with the company's previously discussed growth drivers. SG&A expense was $75.8 million in the Q3 of 2022, compared with $56.1 million for the same period as the prior year. The $19.7 million increase was primarily due to personnel related expenses as we increased headcount across the organization, and secondarily due to higher marketing costs, travel expenses, and facility related costs. Net loss for the Q3 of 2022 was $10.2 million, compared to net loss of $2.8 million for the same period as the prior year. The basic and fully diluted net loss per share for the Q3 of 2022 was $0.19, based on the weighted average basic and fully diluted share count of 53.5 million. These compare with a basic and fully diluted net loss per share of $0.06 based on a weighted average basic and fully diluted share count of 50 million for the same period of the prior year. Before I move on to the balance sheet updates, I'd like to comment briefly on the company's Q3 operating loss of $9.8 million. As you know, we continue to invest aggressively in our growth drivers. This has served our patients and company well and contributed to our significant growth. I'd like to reiterate that we intend to be consistently profitable commencing in the first half of 2024. Moving to the balance sheet. Our cash and investments at the end of Q3 totaled $319.2 million, consisting of $83.5 million of cash and $235.7 million of short-term investments. By way of reference, our cash and investments as of the end of Q2 2022 were $330.5 million. Our cash flows used in operating activities were $13.1 million for the Q3 of 2022, compared to cash flows used in operating activities of $5.6 million in the Q3 of 2021. Next, I'd like to address Inari's financial guidance for the full year 2022. We are raising our revenue guidance to $373 million to $375 million, up from the existing range of $360 million to $370 million. Consistent with prior years, we will provide 2023 guidance early next year. However, if it's not apparent from our prior remarks, we remain extremely bullish in our business and our ability to grow next year and beyond. With that, I'd like to turn the call back to the moderator for questions. For the Q&A segment, Bill, Drew and I will be joined by Thomas M. Tu, Inari's Chief Medical Officer. Thank you. We will now begin the Q&A session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touchtone phone. If you are using a speakerphone, we ask that you please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Today's first question comes from Travis Steed at Bank of America. Please go ahead. Hey, great, thanks for taking the question and congrats on a good quarter. I guess just to follow up on some of the 2023 comments, you know, committed to strong growth, but the street has a 20% growth right now. Just kind of curious if that's a good place to be for now. When you think about that number, like, it seems like the base business alone could continue doing 20% growth kind of longer term. I don't know if you're willing just to say that on the base and then any color on how to think about the new products. Yeah, thanks for that, Travis. This is Drew. I can get started on that, and then Mitch may want to follow up with some of the more specifics on the financials. You know, Travis, I think in general, as you heard, we feel really good about how we're positioned here looking ahead to the end of this year. That carries through, right, through 2023 as well. We've got the mega class that is ramping and kind of hitting the sweet spot of their productivity. We've got not one, but two new products now out in full market release, representing incremental revenue opportunity. We've got our VTE Excellence program that is really starting to click on all cylinders and gain meaningful traction. We've got new data that we're able to leverage both with FLASH as well as just this week with the CLOUT data set as well. Taken together, we feel very confident here looking ahead to the end of this year and out into 2023 as well. We're gonna stop short of providing any specific guidance on 2023 today. That will come early next year, but did want to reiterate how confident we're feeling when we look across all of our growth drivers. With that, I don't know, Mitch, if you have anything you wanted to A couple comments to add to that, Travis. One, our year-over-year growth, I believe is about 32%, you know, just quarter-over-quarter. So I think we feel like we continue to have a business with a tremendous amount of growth potential. You know, because of the current penetration rate in the addressable market, you know, we think this business has a very attractive growth opportunities, you know, for many quarters and years to come. I think you also asked about the new product contribution, and maybe I can just comment that as we're kind of working through Q4, you know, we have the two new products, as Drew announced, in full market release. We're working through the VAC approval process and other things with our hospital customers to, you know, kind of getting stuff out into the field. We're excited about the potential we see for those two new products. As you know, both of them actually are incremental to the FlowTriever and the ClotTriever products, which we've been selling for some time. I think as we get into the first part of next year, you know, we'll continue to find ways to update you on the progress that we're making with those two new products and their acceptance in the marketplace. All right. Thanks for the color and fully understand on 2023. I guess the follow-up would be on OpEx growth. I was kind of curious how you're thinking about that, given your commitment to somewhat profitability moving forward. If it's gonna require something around like 10% OpEx growth or if you're gonna be closer to 40% like you did this quarter. Just any kind of help on how you're thinking about, you know, managing expenses, any operating expenses moving forward. Yeah. I can start on that one, Travis. You know, I think you've seen us invest aggressively across all five of those growth drivers, and that's been intentional and deliberate. I think the result has served patients really well. It's allowed us to build some impressive capabilities and competencies that we're gonna be able to leverage going forward. Relative to the profitability, I think you're gonna see us begin to make meaningful progress on our operating income as we move through next year and look ahead to 2024. We've got some advantages in that effort, starting with, you know, gross margins in the mid to high 80%. We've got a really efficient commercial system on top of that, and I think we're gonna be able to make progress towards that longer term profitability goal, simply by easing off the gas, in some of these areas that we've been investing in. We've got an infrastructure now that we've established in clinical, that I do think gives us a base to build on some operating leverage opportunities. In the same regard in the R&D organization, I think we've established and built an engine and infrastructure that we can and will leverage from an operating perspective, going forward. I think you'll see us make progress along those lines as we move through 2023. You heard Mitch reiterate our intention to be consistently profitable as we enter the first half of 2024, and that continues to be how we're thinking about operating income and OpEx investment from here forward. Great. Very helpful. This is Travis Steed. Steed. Sorry, Travis. Just comparing the Q3 figures, for example, for R&D and SG&A. Q3 of 2022, and you compare back to Q3 of 2021, you know, so we had significant growth for the reasons that Drew explained, you know, but we would expect as we move into the 2023 timeframe that you'll see, much more moderate growth, in the R&D line. The SG&A line I think would primarily be growing due to the S part of that, as opposed to the G&A part of that. We feel like we're actually in a really terrific position to leverage and reap, you know, the benefits of these investments we've been making across all five growth drivers. Great. Thanks for that. Congrats again on the quarter. Thanks, Travis. Our next question today comes from Cecilia Furlong with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Great. Good afternoon, and thank you for taking the questions. I wanted to start with some of the new product launches, but if you could just talk about both for ProTrieve and InThrill, really where you are at this point from an account introduction standpoint. If you could talk about Intri24 too, how that's ramped from account penetration. Kind of tied in with that too, any way you could frame or quantify just the sequential net headwinds from new product introductions in 2Q. Sure. I can get started on some of those. For both ProTrieve and InThrill, you heard us talk about now moving into full market release. During Q3, we completed the limited market release with both of those platforms. In that process, we collected not only, you know, clinical and technical feedback from how the products were performing, but also some important commercial feedback as well. All of that informed the decision in both cases to move into full market release with ProTrieve and InThrill, and that's the phase we're in now, here sitting in Q4. That means we've got the products broadly released. The entire field organization has access to those products, and we are in the process of bringing both of those platforms to the broader account base. Keep in mind that requires us to navigate through the VAC approval process and gain approval and get those products established in the hospital and purchase inventory on the shelf, initial in-servicing and training completed with the staff. There's some work obviously required here as we move through that FMR, and we're still in the early phases with both ProTrieve and InThrill of that FMR work. As a result, we would anticipate pretty modest revenue contributions, at least in Q4, from those two products, given the work we need to do that I described in the early phase of the FMR. Looking out to 2023, I think we'll anticipate obviously more meaningful revenue contribution from those two specifically. Intri24, which is another product you mentioned on that, has been in full market release now for some time. You heard us talk about the initial revenue that we had generated by placing Intri24 in BOLD back in Q2. At this point, Intri24 is being used north of 90% of our FlowTriever procedures here in the U.S. are using Intri24. It's been broadly adopted at this point. Maybe just to touch on the last new product that you didn't mention, Artix, we are moving through the LMR still with that product. We are getting good feedback. We like what we're seeing, but we have more work to do to get through the remainder of that LMR, and we'll keep everyone posted as we finish up that LMR on Artix. Another thing you'd wanna follow up on? Just Cecilia. I think you also asked about the headwinds from Q2. As Drew just mentioned, we had a really terrific acceptance as we launched the BOLD and the Intri24 products in Q2. Those two products, obviously that was some revenue in Q2 that doesn't appear in Q3, but we are pleased with the performance of the ClotTriever franchise in Q3 and the procedure growth and the other things that we'd normally be looking at to sort of make sure we have a healthy and growing business there. Great. If I could just follow up around your recent classes sales force hires, what you're seeing from a productivity standpoint at this point, and then recognizing it's early in some of these product launches, but just your initial take on how you're thinking about either a single sales force going forward or thoughts around potentially a second force to really sort of drive penetration of your full product portfolio. Sure. From a productivity standpoint, the biggest dynamic was us bringing on board that mega class that you've heard us reference back one quarter ago now. That was the largest class that we had ever brought on. We did that intentionally looking ahead to the second half of the year when we knew we'd have these new product launches to focus on. As a result of bringing on that big bolus of new sales professionals, obviously the productivity took a hit as a result, anytime you bring on a large class like that. We have been digesting that class over the last 90 days now, and we're starting to see the productivity recover just what we would anticipate and what we've seen with every other class. We like what we're seeing so far. We did hire a much more modest class here exiting the quarter. We're continuing to kind of rest and digest and allow that mega class to ramp up their productivity curve, while also focusing on some of the new product launches. We have decided for now to bring ProTrieve and InThrill out in the bag of the existing sales organization. That was a decision that was informed by the information we collected during the LMR. We think given the overlap in the site of service and the overlap in the interventional call point as well, that it makes good sense to start those two products in the large sales organization. We'll keep a close eye on anything that would signal that we're distracting from the VTE business, but right now, we think it makes the most sense to put all that in the existing channel. If we do decide at any point that we'd be better served to have a separate sales organization, we believe given the characteristics of, you know, all of these new markets that we've targeted, we would largely nonetheless be able to follow the same commercial system and the same commercial playbook that we've developed for VTE, even if we were going to stand up a separate organization. We'll continue to keep an eye on all of those considerations as we move through the initial FMR and get a better sense of how the products are performing in a broad release. Great. Thank you for taking the questions. Thanks, Cecilia. Our next question today comes from Larry Biegelsen with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. Hey, just wanted to start with the implied Q4 guidance matches about 18% year-over-year at the midpoint. It's, you know, only up about 2% quarter-over-quarter. Last year you were up, you know, 14% quarter-over-quarter. You know, is there something one-time in Q3, or is this something, you know, you're seeing in the environment that makes you cautious? You know, given that, you know, call it 18% at the midpoint, how should we think about that in the context of next year? Opportunities that you've heard us describe, you know, including the new products in the field, which are sort of getting out there into the hospital. We're not necessarily seeing a lot of contribution from those products yet in Q4, but excited about the potential that they represent for 2023. We are still wrestling with some of the staffing shortages, which I think you've kind of heard about from everybody. Q4 is sort of a challenging quarter sometimes with some of the holidays that go on during the quarter. I think as we were thinking through the quarter and, you know, thinking about how we would likely finish the year, you know, we just wanted to be very confident about that and make sure we did not get ahead of ourselves, you know, from a guidance point of view. We are very excited, obviously, as we've expressed about 2023, and we're bullish about the prospects for the business next year. That's helpful. I wanted to ask on ProTrieve, the feedback has been very good. Drew, you know, where do you see this going in terms of percent of your DVT cases today? You know, do you see an opportunity for ProTrieve outside, you know, with competitor devices? You know, how much pull-through do you think this could drive for your devices? In other words, you know, people switching from competitor devices to ProTrieve. Thank you. Yeah, sure. Thanks for that, Larry. So, you know, if we go back a year, even a year and a half, for the early days of the development work with ProTrieve, as we shared that product with some of our KOLs and gathered feedback on the pipeline, that one product, ProTrieve, always stood out immediately with many of the docs as addressing a significant unmet need and being a very novel solution. We were encouraged by all that, and I think everything we saw during the LMR has, I think, underscored the value that that product has and the potential to address a significant unmet need. We believe at a minimum, ProTrieve can be used in about 15% of our existing DVT procedures, and those are the more complex DVT cases where they've got not only involvement in the iliofemoral segment, but also up in the inferior vena cava, and they've got a significant clot burden that they may be concerned about embolizing as they work to address the clot. That's exactly what we saw play out in the LMR, and I think going forward, we're encouraged that that's what we're gonna see in broad commercial release as well. Certainly, that utility is present not only in our own ClotTriever cases, our own DVT cases, but we also believe ProTrieve can provide value and clinical utility even in DVT interventions that are being done with competitive platforms. I think it's a way for us to add value in those procedures and obviously, in the process, have some real commercial advantages, in that as well. We're encouraged by what we saw in the LMR, and I think as we move through the FMR, hopefully those same advantages will come through as well. All right. Thanks so much, guys. Thanks, Larry. Our next question today comes from Sean Lyman of BTIG. Please go right ahead. Looks like they have my predecessor still on. This is Marie Thibault from BTIG. Thanks for taking the questions. Hey, Marie. No, No, that makes sense at all. I think Sean will be surprised to know he's asking questions. Congrats on a very nice quarter. Wanted to ask one here, my first question here on the procedure environment. You mentioned just in response to the prior question, so wrestling with some staffing shortages. I know in the prior quarter, you talked about reduced interventional capacity. Would love to get an update on how things are going. It certainly didn't seem to impact this quarter's results. Yeah. Marie, I think in general, our sense is those staffing shortages are certainly still present in the vast majority of our accounts, and that's true across the country. They haven't been, you know, magically addressed. We do believe, you've heard this from others as well, that they've stabilized. I think in some cases or many cases, hospitals have become more adept at navigating their way around those staffing shortages. They're still present. We are able to execute through them. You know, we've got a nice story we're able to tell around a modest footprint, a positive economic value proposition, a single center intervention. In a lot of ways, those staffing shortages, we're able to to navigate our way through them, and I think that's exactly what you saw us do in Q3. They're still out there. They're stable, and we're finding a way to to help patients despite some of those headwinds. Okay. That's good to hear. Maybe I'll ask my second question a little away from results. You know, in the conversations I have with investors, we still hear a lot of questions and competitive chatter. Wanted to hear from your in your own words, I guess, you know, your thoughts on some of this competitive chatter, what you hear out in the marketplace, and what we should be taking away from all of that. Thank you. Yeah. You know, over the last 12 months, we have been asked pretty consistently about JEDI and WOLF and AngioVac and AlphaVac, ClotTriever, QuickClear, Bashir, you know, and the list goes on and on. At the same time, you know, over the last year, to be candid, I don't think any of those platforms have had a meaningful impact in the market. I think there's a couple of reasons for that. The first reason is you've heard us share this in the past. This is harder than it looks. The idea of simply, you know, getting a quick 510(k) for a catheter platform and bringing it to market and experiencing, you know, explosive growth or a big impact, I think it's simply harder than it looks, and there is much more work to do from a development standpoint, certainly from a clinical standpoint, to get some of these new platforms on label for PE, from a regulatory and commercial standpoint. All of it is harder than it looks. Secondly, you know, I think being able to compete these new platforms based upon a widget alone, I think is also increasingly difficult. You know, I think it stands in contrast to how we have approached the market. Even if you look just over the last year at what we've been able to accomplish in that same timeframe, you know, we're at 275, north of 275, sales professionals, closing in on 350 people in our field organization. If you include our sales leadership team, our national accounts team, our health economic and market access team, our Inari Solutions Group team, closing in on 350 people across that organization. Our VTE Excellence program built out now in a very comprehensive way, in a way that we think is gonna be repeatable and scalable in helping develop these VTE programs. An innovation engine, you know, with 24 programs in development, new markets, new patient populations, fourth generation product now, FlowTriever and ClotTriever, nine separate tools in the FlowTriever toolkit, five in the ClotTriever toolkit. You know, I think all of that speaks to how comprehensively we are approaching this market, the kind of investments that we've been making consistently across those growth drivers, and I think it stands in contrast to some of these emerging competitors. You know, clinical is another area that I think we have approached, and I think in a very differentiated kind of approach. Tom, do you wanna talk about clinical and how Yeah. Yeah, I'd love to. Marie, just to add one more point to that. As these markets grow and as our customers become more sophisticated, you see an ever-increasing value placed on high-quality data. Of course, we have very large, you know, the largest ever prospective registries in FLASH and CLOUT. You see sophisticated statistical analysis comparing our results to former landmark studies like ATTRACT. There's just no other competitor out there that's leading the way in this both quantity as well as quality. You know, not to mention two simultaneously run RCTs and possibly more to come. We're really excited that not only are the devices working, the commercial engine is humming along, but clinical is also contributing just as much. All right, well understood. Thank you. Thanks, Marie. Our next question today comes from Bill Plovanic with Canaccord. Please go ahead. Great. Thanks for taking my questions. I was wondering, just first, a couple of things. One, with the guidance, and I know it's already been asked, but, I mean, the guidance really doesn't seem like it contemplates any benefit from the new products or the new reps really kind of ramping up, and I think other people have kinda asked around the fringes on this. Help us understand why they wouldn't? Because, I mean, a $3 million to $4 million sequential uptick is one of the slowest quarters you would have. I'm just trying to understand kinda where this is coming from. Yeah. Bill, I can get started on that. Mitch may wanna jump in as well. You know, from a new product standpoint and the contributions of ProTrieve and InThrill, you know, you heard me describe earlier, we do need to navigate our way through the VAC approval process for each of those two new products as we enter the initial phases of this full market release. As a result, you know, we would anticipate pretty modest revenue contributions here in Q4 from ProTrieve and InThrill. On the rep productivity side, yes, those mega class reps are ramping through their productivity curve and hitting the sweet spot of their productivity. At the same time, you know, as you heard Mitch describe, as we've always said, when we put a number out there, we wanna be highly confident in our ability to hit that commitment. We do have the staffing shortages that are still out there that you heard us talk about. We've got, you know, seasonality with the holidays here at the end of Q4. I think all of that is included in the guidance that you heard Mitch put out. Anything you'd add? Okay. I was wondering if you could give us some qualitative just on, you know, I think historically you've talked about accounts and then new account adds. Kinda where are you in that transition of bringing on new accounts versus going in deeper? You know, if you could quantify maybe the new account growth on a percentage basis year-over-year. Lastly for me is any commentary on ASP trends. Thanks. Yeah. From an account standpoint, Bill, we're closing in probably north of 1,500 accounts at this point, active accounts, across the country. We continue to add each and every quarter. That new add rate is slowing, as you would anticipate. We've talked about someplace in the neighborhood of 2,000 target accounts. We're you know, approaching the later innings of that account build-out, which is exactly what you'd expect. As a result, the vast majority of our cases and incremental case growth in the quarter is already coming from established accounts. In fact, in Q3, 98% of our cases came from existing accounts, from accounts where we had already established a presence in and we're driving deeper adoption, particularly by leveraging our VTE Excellence program. I think that will continue to be the story as we look ahead to 2023. Clearly, penetration adoption will continue to drive the vast majority of our growth and already, candidly, are doing so already. Relative to ASP is the second part of your question. Stability across the board in Q3, no big changes from that standpoint. We're still able, as contracts come up for renewal, to take price or attempt to take price, and we succeed more often than we fail. We're able to point to some of the new products that we have brought forward underneath that per procedure price model as rationale for those price uplifts or at least price stability if we're not able to get the uplift. No big changes there, and I think all that continues to reflect the strong underlying economic value proposition that both products enjoy. Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Thanks, Bill. Thank you. Our next question comes from Adam Maeder with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Hi, good afternoon. Thank you for taking the questions, and congrats on the progress. Maybe to start, wanted to ask about ClotTriever BOLD and see if there's any update there, in terms of uptake. You know, where do volumes stand with that product? Are clinicians using BOLD predominantly for chronic clot, or are you also seeing a mix of chronic and acute clot use? And just how do we think about that application over time? And then I had a follow-up. Yeah. Thanks, Adam. You know, just to remind everybody on BOLD, that is the same ClotTriever platform with one key improvement, and that is a stronger radial force on the leading edge of the coring element. We did that really to design it to do a better job on tenacious chronic clot. BOLD is in about 50% of our accounts at this point. We're seeing it used kind of as a frontline go-to product for all DVT interventions, both acute and chronic. We're clearly getting good feedback on how it performs in all of those settings. I think in many cases, it can result in fewer passes just because it's doing a better job of removing the clot. It's being used as a workhorse in what would be historically our core DVT products. At the same time, BOLD is also, I think, giving us access for the first time to that new chronic venous disease patient population. Patients that have truly chronic clot that is months or even years old, and that BOLD is strong enough to try and address the underlying cause of their disease. BOLD, in that sense, is the first of what will be a toolbox that we will build out over time, a purpose-built toolbox specifically for chronic venous disease. You heard us talk about some of the new tools that we're gonna add to that toolbox. We have a stent cleaner product that's now branded as RevCore, which will come out next year. We've got a second recanalization tool that will be added to that toolbox. All of those designed specifically for this chronic venous disease patient population. This massive group of patients with spectacular unmet needs where we believe, you know, we can help make a difference by addressing the underlying cause of their disease. We're in the early stages of focusing on that patient population, but BOLD is front and center today for that effort as well. That's really helpful, Drew. Thank you for that. The follow-up, wanted to ask about DEFIANCE, your randomized controlled trial with ClotTriever versus anticoagulants. I think I heard that's gonna start enrolling in Q1. How quickly do you think that trial can enroll? Are you able to share any details at this point in time? I think I heard you mention that you think, you know, ClotTriever could become standard of care if successful. Maybe just flesh that out a little bit as well. Thanks again for taking the questions. Adam, this is Tom. I'll tackle that question. Firstly, DEFIANCE, which is an RCT in the DVT space, is comparing ClotTriever to anticoagulation for treatment of iliofemoral DVT. The design of DEFIANCE was based on our vast experience using the CLOUT registry data, which you saw presented Monday morning. I think really serves as the next phase of our understanding of interventional treatment for DVT to updates on the rather long in the tooth now ATTRACT data. We have some comparisons of CLOUT to ATTRACT, which offers very good commentary as to the progress we've made in our technology. DEFIANCE is an RCT that, as Drew stated previously, may very well change the standard of care for this disease state. As far as the specifics, DVT trials historically do take a little bit of time to enroll. The excitement level among our customers is high, and we're gonna kick off Q1. Once we complete the site selection process, I think there's gonna be a lot more to say about the specific trial design as well as some of the outcomes. Thank you. Thanks, Adam. Our next question today comes from Richard Newitter with Truist Securities. Please go ahead. Hi. Thanks for taking the questions. Just a couple here. On the data that you had at VIVA and The VEINS last in the CLOUT registry, I'm just curious, the data sets there, what was the feedback and, you know, do you expect any material impact, you know, to the market's adoption curve here from these, or are you really kind of looking more for DEFIANCE, PEERLESS to set the tone for standard of care type potential? This is Tom here. I was in the room when the two CLOUT 500 data sets were presented. I'll tell you, there were two different reactions that I detected. The first was one of kind of nodding confirmation that, yeah, of course, you know, ClotTriever is safe. ClotTriever is the best in class device for thrombus removal. Not much of a surprise for many people in the room who've had ClotTriever experience. On the other hand, I would say the overarching take-home message from the audience was that the level of sophistication of this data, as well as the quantity of the patients studied and the abstract after abstract, publication after publication, podium presentation one after the other, is something that is just unparalleled compared to some of the more early entrants that our competitors had to offer at this late-breaking clinical trial presentation. As far as commercial adoption is concerned, you know, I think that really is dependent on our commercial team's ability to communicate the value of this clinical data. You know, certainly not all of our users have the opportunity to attend these meetings or even read the updates online. I think there's always the boots on the ground hand-to-hand combat, but we've armed our commercial team with the best possible information with which they can use to influence their customers. Great. Then just two quick ones additionally. On how should we think about new product impacting your gross margin, especially as you know, with separate ASPs and moving through 2023. Then just on your rep hiring, it's one of the more impressive and faster, bigger cadences I've seen of hiring reps so quickly. What is your confidence in being able to bring everyone kind of up the productivity curve in a predictable fashion? You know, we've seen territory splitting in the past when it's happened as aggressively come with some pain. I just would love to hear how you guys are ensuring the onboarding goes smoothly, there's no hiccups. Thanks a lot. Sure, Richard, thanks for those. First on the margin on the new products, you know, ProTrieve is priced as a standalone SKU at $4,000. InThrill also priced separately from FlowTriever and ClotTriever as a separate, you know, system-based price also of $4,000. The margin profile of each of those is fairly similar in the same neighborhood as FlowTriever and ClotTriever. I think, you know, as Mitch talks about, you know, mid- to high-80s% is a pretty good range for our gross margin. You know, that includes the impact of those new products. In terms of the productivity and the new folks we brought on board, yes, it's been a very fast ramp. We've done that intentionally as part of our overall commercial system. Many of those adds, and certainly all of the recent ones are in the nature of a territory split. That positions both the legacy rep and the new rep to look after smaller territories, and as a result, have bandwidth to do the kind of work we need to do for VTE Excellence and driving adoption and penetration. That's been a key part of our overall commercial system. We've got a very deliberate compensation program that aligns the sales professionals' incentives towards territory splits. You know, usually for a device company, a split's good for the company and not so advantageous for the sales professional. We've been really deliberate about designing a compensation program that actually aligns the reps' incentives and has them welcoming territory splits as a result. That's been a key part of why we've been able to add as quickly as we have up till now and will continue to be a key part of our system going forward as well. Thank you. Yeah. Thanks, Richard. Our next question today comes from Michael Sarcone with Jefferies. Please go ahead. Good afternoon, and thanks for squeezing me in here. My first question, just to follow up on Artix. You talked about having some more work to do, you know, being in the LMR. Can you just talk about or elaborate on, you know, what's next, what work do you have to do that's remaining and maybe the timing left before you can transition to FMR? Sure, Michael. You know, Artix, just to remind everybody, that is a product designed for peripheral arterial thrombosis. Two-part system today. We've got a balloon guide sheath with that provides proximal flow arrest and prevents distal embolization. A second component of that system that's a mechanical thrombectomy component as well. We've gotten good feedback on how that system has performed in the LMR. We're about where we thought we'd be at this point. Keep in mind, that is a smaller market than some of these other new markets we're getting into. As a result, we knew that the LMR would likely take a little longer. We don't have a specific timing or timeline associated with LMRs. What we're really most focused on is gathering the clinical and technical and commercial information that we're seeking in the LMR. That will be what governs the timing from here. You know, certainly it will likely last through the rest of this quarter and into next year before we're in a position to decide whether or not that product and system is ready for prime time and for full market release. So far so good. We like what we're seeing and hearing from the docs, and we'll keep executing on the LMR and keeping you appraised as we move forward. Great. Thank you. My follow-up is just on the VTE Excellence program. You've talked about some hospital staffing shortages and, you know, impacting procedures, but you're working around those. I was just curious, you know, what type of impact does that have on progress you're making in the VTE Excellence program? Just with the thought that, you know, once we do get to a point where, hospital staffing does resolve, and there are less capacity constraints, do you expect to see an acceleration in progress, you know, in what your VTE Excellence program is driving? Yeah. You know, to do that work associated with VTE Excellence, to develop these programs and systematically identify, risk stratify, and bring these patients forward to caregivers that really understand the disease. To do that kind of work, you need folks to have bandwidth at the hospital. Certainly, for instance, during the pandemic, the height of the pandemic, that was a challenge. If your hospital is inundated with COVID patients, you understandably don't have a lot of time or bandwidth to focus on program development for VTE. I think in some ways a similar theme has played out with some of these staffing shortages. At the height of those challenges, in some accounts, they simply didn't have bandwidth and time to be able to focus on program development and do the kind of work and partnership with us to develop these programs. I think in both cases, both with COVID as well as with the staffing shortages, the environment is more conducive today. There's more bandwidth today, more receptivity for us to do that work and to partner with accounts in those ways. I think certainly in Q3, we began to see a more conducive operating environment, and I think we're seeing good traction and increasing impact from that VTE Excellence effort and program. Michael, if I can just add. You know, if you think about the, I think Drew mentioned during his comments, you know, we're just getting started, and sometimes hear us say that. I think VTE Excellence is the next is a great example of that. You know, we're making great progress, getting good traction in many hospitals. In some of the academic medical centers, though, to, you know, no surprise to anybody, they're looking for more data. So as you think forward over the next year or two, three, and you see us completing the enrollment in our randomized clinical trials and reporting those results. Ultimately, you can kinda see multiple ships kinda coming into harbor at the same time. That's something that I think will ultimately, you know, kinda cause a change not only in standard of care, but hopefully a change in, you know, the interventional rates and the products that are being used in the marketplace. We're really playing a long game here. You know, we appreciate the support of all of our investors who have that, you know, kinda share that vision for where we wanna go, you know, with this business. That's helpful. Thank you. Thanks, Michael. Our next question comes from Dev Weerasuriya with Berenberg Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Hey, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. I wanna focus a little bit on the OUS expansion. Any major improvements in reimbursement across any of the geographies? Just a little bit of color on the expansion of the commercial presence across geographies that you currently are already in, specifically Germany. Would love to know kind of how the sales team is going on that front. Lastly, just from a OUS revenue standpoint, you know, would love to know the cadence of growth, you know, quarter-over-quarter. I know, you know, sequentially too, but has that growth rate been similar over the last quarters, or would love to get a gauge of that. Thank you. Sure. Thanks for those, Dev. We saw record growth in Q3 across the OUS franchise, and that was driven primarily through our efforts in Europe. We do have that initial commercial footprint established. I think on a go-forward basis, more of the growth will come from productivity gains from that existing initial investment and infrastructure that we built, as opposed to probably adding as aggressively as we've added over the last year. I think you will see us begin to grow into that investment, and I think additional adds going forward will be more governed by productivity gains and gated to growth. In terms of the reimbursement, no big changes in Q3. You know, we've got the NUB in Germany. We're still doing work to get reimbursement established broadly in France. We're doing some work in the U.K.. No big announcements or changes, just continued execution and continued growth and candidly continued record revenue and case growth, albeit still at a scale, as you heard us talk about, that's still not material to the broader overall commercial franchise. Great. Maybe if I could just follow up and just compare the OUS expansion opportunity versus new products here. I guess from a materiality standpoint for revenue, you know, would you expect kind of ProTrieve, Artix, InThrill, in combination to here in the U.S. be, you know, more material than OUS over the next year? You wanna take that, Mitch? Yeah, I'll try to get started on that one, Dev. As you've heard us talk about the OUS revenue, you know, we've said that it's been a record quarter. We're really pleased with the growth of the business outside the U.S.. Having said that, it's not material from the point of view of, you know, breaking it out on our financial statements. I think we'd sort of be following a similar approach with the new products. You know, again, very excited. The two new products that are in full market release and working through the hospital VAC processes, you know, those are going to begin to get some traction in Q4, but more significant progress in 2023. As those become more significant contributors to the business, you know, from a revenue point of view, then we'll ultimately break those out in our financials. You know, I think for the immediate term, we don't expect that they're going to sort of achieve that kind of magnitude relative to the revenue which is being produced by the ClotTriever and by the FlowTriever franchises. Well, thank you very much. Thanks, Dev. Thank you, Dev. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's Q& session and today's Conference Call. We thank you all for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect your lines and have a wonderful evening. Thanks, everybody. Thank you.