Good day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Navient third quarter 2021 earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one on your telephone. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. If you require any further assistance, please press star zero. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Mr. Nathan Rutledge, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thanks, Renz. Good morning, and welcome to Navient's third quarter 2021 earnings call. With me today are Jack Remondi, our CEO, and Joe Fisher, our CFO. After their pre-prepared remarks, we will open up the call for questions. Before we begin, keep in mind our discussion will contain predictions, expectations, forward-looking statements, and other information about our business that is based on management's current expectations as of the date of this presentation. Actual results in the future may be materially different from those discussed here. This could be due to a variety of factors. Listeners should refer to the discussion of those factors on the company's Form 10-K and other filings with the SEC. During this conference call, we will refer to non-GAAP financial measures, including Core Earnings, Adjusted Tangible Equity Ratio, and various other non-GAAP financial measures derived from Core Earnings. Our GAAP results and description of our non-GAAP financial measures and a full reconciliation to GAAP can be found in the third quarter of 2021 supplemental earnings disclosure. This is posted on the investor page at navient.com. Thank you, and I'll turn the call over to Jack now. Thanks, Nathan. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today and for your interest in Navient. Our business model and execution continue to deliver strong results and create value. This quarter's financial results build on our efforts to maximize cash flow from our legacy portfolio, create value from the origination of high-quality student loans, and leverage our operating platform to deliver valuable outsourcing services to our clients across multiple business lines. For the quarter, core earnings totaled $149 million with an adjusted core earnings per share of $0.92. With another quarter of exceptional financial performance, we are again raising our adjusted core EPS forecast for 2021 to at least $4.50 per share. Projected earnings per share for 2021 are now more than 40% higher than our forecast at the start of the year. This quarter's results were driven by stable margins in our lending segments, strong demand for our private education loan products, and continued strength in delivering services to our state and local clients in our Business Processing Solutions segment. Net interest income remained robust this quarter, increasing $17 million over the prior quarter. We continue to benefit from a favorable interest rate environment, lower funding costs, and an increase in our private education loan balances. During the quarter, we originated $1.5 billion in refi student loans, an increase of 16% over the year ago quarter. Though the extension of the interest waiver on Federal Direct Loans through January 31st significantly tempered demand for our refi loan product this year, we were able to grow by helping borrowers with private loans lower their interest rate. We do expect demand to increase in 2022 with the expiration of the interest and payment waiver next January. In-school loan volume in the quarter totaled $153 million, and for the full year, we expect loan volume to exceed $200 million. These loans are purchased after they are fully disbursed. We are also confident that the combined loan volume will exceed our original forecast of $5.5 billion for 2021. In our Business Processing segment, revenue increased 36% over the year-ago quarter as a result of the extension of our contracts assisting states in various COVID-related project work. Through this work, we've been able to demonstrate the agility of our platforms and people to respond to new and large needs with speed, efficiency, and effectiveness. While these contracts are expected to end this year, we are focused on leveraging this experience and demonstrating our value proposition to develop new opportunities. We are optimistic about our opportunities here, but acknowledge that the more typical RFP timelines and startup schedules are significantly longer than what we experienced during the pandemic. Credit performance remains very strong. We are seeing continued resilience from our FFELP and private education loan borrowers, leading to low levels of delinquency and default. Our outlook remains cautious given the planned return to repayment of the Federal Direct Loan portfolio in February, and our loan loss reserves reflect this. Operating efficiency was strong with an efficiency ratio of 50% this quarter. Maintaining a strong efficiency ratio is a key focus as our BPS project work winds down, and we complete our direct loan servicing transition. At the beginning of the pandemic, the decline in interest rates and higher loan loss provisions negatively impacted our capital ratios. Our strong earnings through the pandemic and significantly better than anticipated credit performance to date has seen our capital ratios return to their targeted levels of 6% or more. We continue to prioritize our allocation of capital beyond our capital targets to growing our student lending and BPS opportunities, maintaining our dividend, and returning excess capital to investors. As such, we purchased 26.9 million shares this year or 14% of shares outstanding. In a significant development this quarter, we announced an agreement to transfer our servicing contract with the Department of Education to Maximus. This transfer is now complete with the receipt of the novation by the department last week. For a period of time, we will provide transition services to Maximus. This transfer brings to an end the services we provide to the Federal Direct Loan Program. We will continue our existing business in the FFELP sector. The road to this point started over a year ago when we declined to accept the NextGen servicing contract award. With this decision, it became clear that direct loan servicing was unlikely to be part of our future, with only the effective date to be determined. Given our strong desire to facilitate an orderly transition, we began to explore solutions that would deliver a smooth transfer for borrowers and the 800 employees who supported this contract. This summer, we identified a potential solution to work with Maximus, one of the providers under the NextGen servicing contract. We approached the department with a constructive proposal that would deliver a smooth transition for borrowers, provide a new home for our 800 employees, and provide the department with the needed servicing capacity. All parties worked collaboratively to ensure a strong solution. We are very proud of our long track record of successfully assisting borrowers in repaying their student loans. We've been the leader in income-driven repayment plan enrollment, and we have consistently led with the lowest default rates. We're also pleased to see that many of our recommendations are now being implemented. This contract, however, generates only 6% of our revenue and was unlikely to grow in the future. It also significantly complicated our investment story, given its heightened political and regulatory position. While it is difficult to say goodbye to 800 of my colleagues, I believe we found the best solution for them and for the 5.6 million borrowers we served. This transfer will simplify our story and allow for our full attention to center on growing our consumer lending and business processing segments, creating increased value for our investors. This has been a busy and a productive quarter at Navient. We continue to deliver strong earnings with capital generation while building our loan origination and business processing opportunities. Our decision to transfer our direct loan servicing contract better positions our company to focus on our meaningful growth opportunities while simplifying and de-risking our investment story. These accomplishments are the result of the hard work of a dedicated team focused on creating value for our customers and clients and for our investors. I'm looking forward to a strong finish to 2021 and continuing to deliver on our potential in 2022 and beyond. I'll now ask Joe to provide more details on the quarter, and I look forward to taking your questions later in the call. Joe? Jack, thank you to everyone on today's call for your interest in Navient. During my prepared remarks, I will review the third quarter results for 2021. I'll be referencing the earnings call presentation, which can be found on the company's website in the investor section. Our third quarter results compared to our original outlook for 2021 is provided on slide four. Through the first nine months, we've exceeded all of our original targets, and we are well-positioned for the remainder of the year. As a result of the strong performance and updated outlook, we are increasing our adjusted core earnings per share guidance to at least $4.50, an increase of over 40% compared to our original guidance. Our outlook excludes regulatory and restructuring costs, reflects the current interest rate environment, includes year-to-date debt repurchases, and assumes the utilization of the remaining share repurchase authority of $150 million. Key highlights from the quarter, beginning on slide five, include GAAP EPS of $1.04 and adjusted core EPS of $0.92. Originated $1.6 billion of private education loans, including $153 million of new in-school loans. Achieved BPS EBITDA margin of 31% in the quarter, reduced our total unsecured debt outstanding by 9%, and returned $176 million to shareholders in the form of repurchases and dividends. Let's move to segment reporting, beginning with federal education loans on slide six. Net interest margin increased 1 basis point from the prior year to 104 basis points. Net interest income declined 6% despite a decline in the portfolio of 9%. This portfolio continues to benefit from the current interest rate environment and ongoing improvement in funding costs. Total delinquency rates declined to 8.5% from 9.3% a year ago, while charge-offs remain stable at historically low levels. Other revenue remained flat at $61 million compared to second quarter, and was down $26 million from a year ago, primarily related to the impact of COVID-19 on certain collection activities. We'll provide additional information on the transfer of our Department of Education servicing contract on slide seven. Earlier this month, we received all necessary approvals to transfer the Department of Education servicing contract to Maximus. During the quarter, this contract contributed $34 million of revenue on 5.6 million accounts serviced, compared to $36 million of revenue on the same number of accounts a year ago. The expenses associated with the servicing platform for this contract, including the 800 dedicated employees that currently service the contract and restaffing efforts in anticipation of the expiration of the CARES Act, will all be transferred to Maximus by year-end. For 2022, we anticipate incurring certain ongoing expense for the contract in conjunction with a transition services agreement, for which we will receive offsetting revenue payments. As we manage the transition, we anticipate the impact from the transfer of this contract to result in less than $0.10 in earnings per share for 2022. We will work aggressively to minimize this impact through additional expense reductions. As we look to 2022 and beyond, this transfer allows us to simplify and de-risk the investor story and increase focus on our growing consumer lending and BPS businesses. Now let's turn to slide eight in our consumer lending segment. The total portfolio grew modestly from the second quarter. It was down 6% from a year ago as a result of the $1.6 billion in loan sales that occurred earlier this year. The net interest margin of 298 basis points is above our guided range. It is 26 basis points lower than the year-ago quarter, largely driven by a shift toward our high-quality private refi product within our consumer lending portfolio, which now accounts for 46% of total loans in the segment, compared to 37% a year ago. In the quarter, we originated $1.6 billion of total private education loans. This includes $153 million of in-school private education loans. These loans were made through our banking partner entirely to students attending not-for-profit institutions this fall, and 73% were first-time borrowers to us. Our private education refinance loan originations of $1.5 billion in the quarter means we expect to exceed our year-end target of at least $5.5 billion in total volume. We anticipate that the end of the CARES Act, that is currently scheduled to occur on January 31st, will provide an opportunity for additional refinance volume as borrowers who have been paying 0% interest for nearly two years will see loans return to their original terms and will look to refinance to lower rates. Credit trends continue to exceed our expectations, and while economic conditions continue to improve, our allowance reflects the uncertainty related to the potential negative impact to the portfolio from the end of various payment relief and stimulus benefits that recently occurred or are currently forecasted to end in January 2022. The $22 million provision in the quarter was primarily related to the $1.6 billion of newly originated private education loans. As borrowers continue to transition to repayment, we feel confident that we are adequately reserved given the well-seasoned and high credit quality of our portfolio. Continue to slide nine to review our business processing segment. The $32 million increase in revenue from the prior year, as we leveraged our technology-enabled platform to provide a broader scope of work, is largely due to contracts supporting states in their efforts to provide unemployment benefits, contact tracing, and vaccine administration, as well as an increase in revenue from our traditional Business Processing Solutions. Compared to the second quarter, the revenue from our traditional Business Processing Solutions as we continue to win new and expand on existing contracts partially offset the decline in revenue from the pandemic-related contracts, which was expected. We anticipate the pandemic-related contract expirations will continue to wind down and decrease revenues in the BPS segment by 20% from the third quarter to the fourth quarter. As our growth businesses contribute a larger proportion to our overall revenue and expenses, we achieved an overall efficiency ratio for the company of 50% in the quarter, outperforming our original target of 52% set at the beginning of the year. Let's turn to our financing and capital allocation activity that is highlighted on slide 10. During the quarter, we reduced our existing unsecured debt footprint by 9% or $757 million, resulting in a repurchase loss of $20 million or $0.09 per share. This debt was set to expire in January of 2022. Over the last 12 months, we have reduced our total unsecured debt by $2.1 billion. We have no existing maturities for the remainder of 2021 and have reduced our total unsecured debt due in 2022 to $900 million. During the quarter, we issued $2 billion of term funded private education refinance loan ABS. We have seen increased investor demand for these transactions as we received over $500 million of orders from first-time investors in our program, leading to improved spreads. These transactions demonstrate our ability to reduce our cost of funds as we manage the growth of our high-quality private education loan portfolio and the amortization of our government-guaranteed FFEL portfolio. During the quarter, we repurchased 7 million shares at an average price of $21.42, all while improving our ATE ratio to 6.4%. We expect to execute the remaining $150 million of authority over the remainder of the year. Let's turn to GAAP results on slide 11. We recorded third quarter GAAP net income of $173 million, or $1.04 per share, compared with net income of $207 million or $1.07 per share in the third quarter of 2020. In summary, Team Navient's ability to meet the challenges and needs of our customers led to strong results across all business lines, allowing us to raise our guidance for the remainder of the year to at least $4.50. I would like to thank all of Team Navient for delivering another strong quarter and recognize the 800 employees who have provided best-in-class solutions for Department of Education borrowers over the past 12 years. Thank you for your time, and I will now open the call for questions. Thank you, sir. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one on your telephone. To withdraw your question, press the pound key. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. We have our first question from the line of Sanjay Sakhrani from KBW. Please go ahead. Good morning and congratulations on the servicing portfolio sale. Joe, maybe you could just extrapolate out a little bit. I know we've asked this question before in previous quarters, but when we think about the new guidance range, how much of that EPS is coming from better NIM versus portfolio? Maybe just think about the sustainability of that NIM going forward. Then, if we were to think about that $4.50 on a go-forward basis, you know, what's the run rate of earnings if you take out some of the exogenous impacts this year? Thanks. Sure. On the various NIM components, I think we've done a great job in terms of execution from a financing perspective of maintaining these higher level NIMs, specifically on the FFEL portfolio. The FFEL portfolio is fairly predictable. We've been providing cash flows for the last 10+ years, so we have a good sense of where we believe, you know, certainly those cash flows are gonna come in over the next 20+ years here. From a FFEL NIM perspective, I think you can feel pretty confident that it's gonna be within the range that we suggested at the beginning of the year, that mid- to high-90s. We have been exceeding that throughout this year. So far, you know, year to date, we're at that high end of the range. On the private portfolio, I'd say it's more of a mixed component. As we originate more and more of our newly originated refi loans, those come in at a lower NIM than our legacy or our new in-school loans. Our guidance at the beginning of the year of 270-280, while we're closer to 3% for this year, I would imagine that as that mix shifts, that will continue to trend lower towards that 270-280 range as we think about this year. Then beyond, it's just gonna really be a function of mix. I think on the BPS segment, we've done a tremendous job of continuing to expand on existing contracts as well as win some new contracts. While we're not prepared to give guidance for the full year of 2022 as it relates to the pandemic-related contracts, I feel pretty good about where that success has been. You had mentioned about just items that I think about for the run rate for next year, I would just point to the loan sales that contributed close to, I think, $191 million or at this point about $0.87 year to date. I think that's one of the things that you would not anticipate repeating, although we'll continually look to be opportunistic for potential loan sales here. That would not be in any future run rate, and I don't believe it's incorporated in anyone's EPS forecast for 2022 at this point. Wonderful. Jack, maybe you could just talk about in-school channel. I know you guys saw a nice bump in the originations. Maybe you could just talk about, you know, how things went, some of the lessons learned given some of the lack of performance last year, and how you look towards next year in terms of, you know, being able to build upon this. Thanks. Yeah. Thanks, Sanjay. You know, I think the in-school volume is one that builds upon itself each year as you gain customers and the opportunity for securitization. But also as you gain a positioning with the financial aid offices, and then, you know, an acknowledgement that this is an entity that is here and is committed to the space. All of that takes some time. You know, clearly last year in the pandemic environment, we had fewer students enrolled, many staying at home and therefore not incurring room and board related expenses and schools providing significantly more financial aid. You saw a decrease in demand for education finance products. It slowed momentum down, frankly. You know, we were pleased to see that bounce that we received this year. I think that's really a function of, you know, how we try to differentiate our product and the features of our products to schools and to our potential customers. We saw a much stronger acknowledgment of that value proposition. You know, you see it in the results. You know, we're not. I wouldn't say we're satisfied with where we are. Our goal is to grow that volume in very significant ways each academic year. Just as we are wrapping up the last academic peak season, we're very busy at planning out what we're gonna do for next year to expand upon our success this year as well. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question is from the line of Vincent Caintic from Stephens. Your line is now open. Thanks. Good morning. Thanks for taking my question. Maybe just a follow-up on the NIM question, and maybe a little bit longer term thinking. On a rising interest rate environment, if you can remind us how, you know, your segments behave and, maybe if it's a good or bad thing or the puts and takes we should think about in a rising rate environment. Thank you. Yeah. I think certainly we're benefiting from the current interest rate environment today. You look at the Floor Income and that's a function of just where those rates reset. As we look into 2022 and 2023 and beyond, for our Floor Incomes, nearly 70% of that income is hedged for next year. I would point you to the near-term rate. While, you know, we certainly look at the shape of the curve, what we've seen from one-month LIBOR is that it continues to remain low and we continue to see that benefit here. One of the things that we've recently done in the quarter is with our most recent FFELP securitization, $600 million of that $1 billion deal was set at fixed rates. To the extent that you start to see those rates rise, it's a natural hedge and we would benefit from the fact that it's a fixed cost of funds on that side. We're certainly looking at 2022 and beyond and what it means for a rising interest rate environment. For 2022, 2023 from a floor perspective, we're ahead of that in terms of our hedges that are in place. Okay, thank you for that. Another kind of follow up, but on the student loan sales. Appreciate that, you know, it's not in any guidance that would be given for 2022, but maybe if you could describe the kind of your appetite for more student loan sales, how the environment looks like as well. Thank you. I think you've seen some competitors talk about recent loan sales and you're still seeing elevated levels. It's something that we look at. For us, the amount of unencumbered private education legacy loans is less than $2 billion at this point. We have facilities and avenues of ways that we can raise cash against that quickly. Certainly from a long-term perspective, we don't believe in the make and sell model. To the extent there's opportunities out there, we will explore them as we did this year and we've done in 2019 as well as over the past decade. Okay, great. That's all I had. Thank you. Thank you. The next one we have Mark DeVries from Barclays. Your line is now open. Can you give us some color on the contracts you added this quarter in the BPS segment, how long you expect those for? Also any updated thoughts on how we should think about normalized BPS revenue, you know, as some of these COVID-related revenues fall away. The largest contracts we added were still related to, let's say, pandemic-driven project work. We have been assisting states in processing unemployment insurance claims, some special unemployment programs, some of the vaccine information networks that the states have set up and outreach to residents to let them know where they could go to get vaccinated, et cetera, and then some contact tracing related work. We do expect some of this to continue into 2022, but the vast majority, you know, which was more related on the unemployment side, is definitely things that we would expect to run off and end by the end of this year. What we've been doing is taking that experience and what we delivered in terms of value and trying to identify new opportunities that are longer term in nature. I think many of the states that where we see those opportunities or many of that work where we see those opportunities are gonna return to a more normalized process of issuing formal RFPs and then going through the selection process and set up. You know, in the pandemic when the demand you know expanded dramatically in a short period of time many states didn't have an opportunity to follow that traditional route. We were able to provide and it was really one of the things that stood out for Navient, is that we were actually able to provide hundreds of people to address those issues in a relatively short period of time and, you know, stand up platforms and solutions to meet those needs. You know, I think probably the most encouraging thing I've seen from our clients in this space is an acknowledgement that we were providing more than just the immediate response of people. We were providing insight and analysis and productivity levels that exceeded what they were seeing elsewhere. I think it really sets us up for future success in that space, just one that's gonna take, you know, longer to develop. In our traditional BPS segments, you know, work we've been doing with entities like hospitals and toll authorities, et cetera, that business, you know, suffered during the pandemic. Revenues actually declined as the volume of transactional activity decreased significantly. As that has been coming up, we're starting to see that revenue grow in 2021, and we expect that growth rate, we're more or less at fully recovered rates right now, and we would expect that to grow in double digit levels in 2022 and beyond. Okay. Great. I think you also mentioned you do expect an uptick in demand for the refi product next year as the federal loans go back into repayment. Could you help size that for us? What do you think the impact could be on demand, and how much could those originations increase on a year-over-year basis? Well, historically, the largest share of dollar volume that we were refinancing were students who, or borrowers who had federal student debt. Most of this was graduate related balances. And what you know we saw is a customer who had very high levels of income and was looking to dramatically reduce the interest rate they were paying on their loans and in fact pay their loans off at an accelerated pace. With the CARES Act, when the interest rate was set to zero, you know, it's pretty difficult to compete with free. So many of those customers took the opportunity to basically leave their debt alone at a 0% interest rate. Most of the refinancing that we were doing was related to borrowers who either had certain types of federal loans that weren't eligible for the 0% interest rate or private student loans, which we see as a big opportunity as well. What you're gonna have is if you look at the amount of debt that's outstanding, the largest share by far is loans under the direct loan program. We would expect demand to increase meaningfully next year. We have not yet issued a forecast for that, and we will be doing that in January when we have our fourth quarter earnings call. Okay. No, no color you're willing to provide on just how much you think you could see demand increase? Other than I would say we expect it to be meaningful. Okay, fair enough. Thanks, Jack. Yep. Thank you. The next one we have the line of Lee Cooperman from Omega Family. Please go ahead. Thank you. My question really relates to capital allocation. You know, I've been on these calls for a long time. I think we started our repurchase program when the stock was in the low $30s, and we were embarrassed to see it trade down to about $8. We stayed with the repurchase activity. We're now back to $20. When you look at the trade-off between returning money via dividends or repurchase, with the stock at the current price, how do you see those two alternatives? Thanks, Lee. I'll say thank you for being a long-term investor and believer as well. You know, we definitely still see an opportunity to do both. We don't have any plans at this stage in the game to increase our dividend. We think it's set at an appropriate level and certainly is at a, you know, an above market and an attractive yield even at today's stock prices. If we look at our stock price, while it's certainly significantly higher than some of the lows that you mentioned, we are still trading at a discount to the market overall and expect that, you know, we still see value in returning a significant amount of our extra capital that we're generating and releasing as our legacy portfolio amortizes back through share repurchases. We will be sharing with investors again in January our expectations for our share repurchase expectations or plans for 2022 at that time. Thank you. Thank you. Yep. Thank you. Thank you. Again, as a reminder, if you would like to ask a question over the phone, simply press star, then 1 on your telephone keypad. Again, that would be star 1 on your telephone keypad. The next one, we have the line of Moshe Orenbuch from Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Great, thanks. Jack, could you talk a little bit about how you would see the competitive environment in 2022 once the moratorium is lifted? You know, given that some of your big competitors have been down perhaps 40% in originations during the pandemic, you know, from pre-pandemic levels. You know, again, you know, kind of relate that to the potential for increase in volume. Yes. No question we would expect the marketplace to be fairly competitive, but I don't think it would be any more competitive than it has been in an environment where demand was lighter. You know, I think where we try to compete in this space is with a differentiated product. You know, I think one of the features of our product that is unique and is extremely attractive to our customers is the ability to set their payment. Therefore, they end up with, you know, perhaps an odd number of months of a term that allows them to pay their loans off on their schedule and at their speed, which is typically faster. Our digital-first approach is also somewhat unique in that it connects with customers more efficiently and where they are versus, say, direct mail. Perhaps best, one of the best features of that is it's done at a lower cost in terms of acquiring a customer. On the operational side, you know, our operating efficiency here of, you know, we originate and service these loans in-house. We don't rely on third parties for servicing activity. It gives us an advantage in terms of both efficiency and I would say effectiveness. The effectiveness shows up most dramatically in the default statistics. If you look at historical default rates of refi ABS, our transactions typically run about half all the competition in that area. You know, we think that a combination of features and skills and advantages is really what will set us up well for competing in this space. You know, in the second quarter, we were actually the largest originator of refi loans in the country, so we're growing faster than the competition, and by that metric, obviously taking share, and we would expect to be able to continue that success next year. Gotcha. Okay. Given, you know, kind of two kind of competing factors from the standpoint of buyback likely in 2022, one would be, you know, faster expected loan growth given what you just described. On the other hand, you've also kind of built a higher capital level. Maybe could you just talk a little bit about how you see those two factors interacting? Sure. You know, I think, you know, in an ideal world, our loan demand would be so significant that we would be consuming all of that capital. That would be certainly our first investment use of any capital that we have. We're in a unique situation in that our business is generating a significant amount of capital in excess of what we need. That's really just driven by the large legacy portfolio that exists on our balance sheet. It's amortizing and shrinking. As that shrinks and generates earnings, it's both releasing capital and generating capital in excess of what we believe is necessary to support our loan origination activities. Given that, we would certainly expect, you know, it's inefficient for us to retain that capital and not be able to put it to use. We're returning it to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. As I said in my response to Lee, you know, our expectation or our view right now is that our dividend is set at an appropriate level and our preference is to return the balance through share repurchases. Great. Thanks. Thank you. The next one we have Arren Cyganovich from Citi. Your line's now open. Thanks. You'd mentioned that the private school refi loans actually included some private loans that were refi'd. Were these graduate school loans, or are you refinancing more undergrad loans now? We are doing both. Our largest customer base is still coming from the graduate side simply because they tend to have larger balances, and therefore the financial benefit of refinancing is significantly stronger. We definitely see an opportunity to work with both undergraduates as well as the parents of undergraduates who have borrowed in the private loan sector to refinance their loans. This is really driven from a premise is that when you make an in-school loan, you know, there are two risks, right? There's the risk of graduation, you know, will the student complete their degree and get the benefit of their investment? The second risk is their income sufficient enough to be able to manage that? When you're working in the refi space, you know the answers to those two questions. We're able to use that information, use their repayment experience, use our data that gives us insight into payment performance that's been built up over 40 years of participation in the program here to be able to offer borrowers a lower interest rate that saves them money and makes their student debt, you know, less burdensome. Okay. I mean, that's interesting. I guess my only concern would be that for undergrads, you know, part of this product, which made it unique for graduate students, is typically they were high earners. Undergrads typically aren't high earners when they get out of school. You know, you have pretty limited, you know, margin to really incur any, you know, significant credit losses in the future. Are you underwriting those differently than the graduate school loan? Our underwriting criteria is driven by both the demonstration of experience, you know, in terms of repayment. These are customers who have been in repayment for a number of years. Typically, you know, anywhere from four to six years type of repayment term before they come to us on the refi side. They are underwritten based on excess cash flow, so how much cash flow you have above and beyond. In some cases, we'll be looking at a parent as the borrower in that refinancing opportunity rather than just the student. We don't believe we're taking higher credit risks when underwriting a refi loan to someone with an undergraduate degree versus a graduate degree. It's just a matter of taking a look at those combination of unique credit performance statistics to that borrower and using our 40 years of history here to be able to understand how borrowers with those types of profiles and characteristics perform in all types of economic environments. I think if you look at our legacy portfolio, and you look at the we didn't underwrite loans historically to this type of customer base uniquely. When we look at borrowers who fit that profile, you know, you're gonna see delinquency and default rates that are very consistent with what we're projecting in the refi space as a whole. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. The next one we have the line of Rick Shane from JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Good morning, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. Most have been asked and answered. I'd just like to talk a little bit about more about the servicing novation. Is there anything we should think about in terms of realized gains or losses associated with this? Is there gonna be any earn-out or long-term revenue stream that we should be aware of or any expenses related to severance that we should consider also? The costs associated with the 800 employees related to this contract that will be transferred over to Maximus as well as the restaffing efforts as we prepare for the end of CARES Act. You'll see or we expect to see a good portion of those expenses in this fourth quarter here. As I said in my remarks, that'll be offset by the revenues according to the TSA agreement. We would anticipate that you'll see some of those continued expenses being offset by revenue into the next year, and that's taken into account with our overall EPS impact of less than $0.10 here. I think when you think about our that ten cents and you do the math, what that means is we're gonna be taking out at least, you know, north of $100 million of operating expenses. It gives you a good sense of what 2022 is going to look like. Got it. From an actual and again, novation perspective, nothing else. I mean, it's just moving the revenues and the expenses, but no gains or anything beyond that. Nothing material, no. Okay, great. That's it for me. Thank you, guys. Thank you. The next one we have the line of Bill Ryan from Seaport Research Partners. Your line is now open. Good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. Just a couple things. Just one to follow up on the Business Processing segment. You gave a pretty detailed number going into Q4 of what your expectations are as far as revenues. It sounds like there may be a little bit more wind down. I'm kind of wondering what you're thinking, the baseline revenue number might be in next year, at which point you might start to grow off of that number. Secondly, just on the in-school originations. You know, in prior discussions I've had with you've talked about the loss expectations, I believe around 6%. A little bit lower than some of what your peers are doing. Just kinda curious as to your product positioning and who you're targeting that might lead to a little bit lower loss expectations versus your peers? Thanks. Sorry. On the loss expectations, our life of loan loss expectations are 6%. The reason we look at that is, keep in mind, these are going entirely to not-for-profit institutions. When you compare that to our peers, they have a mix of for-profit as well as schools that are not traditional four-year institutions. I would also add, Bill, we're underwriting and, you know, and trying to provide more financial awareness of different repayment options that are available to borrowers. By doing that, we're encouraging and seeing a higher percentage of borrowers select repayment plans where they're making payments during the in-school period. That's one, it does a couple of things. One, it keeps the loan balance from growing, right? The debt burden is not increasing during that timeframe. Two, it's also demonstrating a strong commitment that the cosigner is there to assist, not in more than just name, right? They're actually adding financial resources to it. We would expect the combination of those factors to be super important. Again, I would just point out, you know, having been in this industry for so long, we have a very unique insight into borrowers through this 40 years of experience, and we're able to use that to really target our underwriting or craft our underwriting criteria to those borrowers that are most likely to be successful in this space. You know, no one benefits by making a loan to someone who's not gonna be able to repay it. So, we're very focused on the higher quality segments of the marketplace, as Joe indicated. Yeah. Just on your first question on BPS outlook. As I said, we're not giving guidance yet for 2022, but at least from the third quarter to the fourth quarter, we anticipate based off of what we know of contracts expected to end in this quarter, that we would see a decline in total BPS revenue of 20%. I think you can look at the past quarters here and where we've seen successful increases in BPS, primarily related to pandemic-related contracts. Those contracts continue to extend and have shifted into other businesses with states as well. We're very pleased with what we've been able to deliver so far, and it's certainly been better than what we forecasted and anticipated. At this point, it's still just a little early to say what that's going to look like for first and second quarter, but we would anticipate from third to fourth quarter a 20% decline. Thank you. Thank you. The next one we have Henry Coffey from Wedbush. Please go ahead. Yeah, good morning, and thank you for taking my question. In what quarter does the whole servicing business go to essentially zero? How quickly does that take? What I mean by zero, when the compensating revenue and offsetting cost go away, and it's just a closed door. In our guidance, we are anticipating that it ends by the end of 2022. Okay. Just a much more abstract question. You're building up this really solid refinance business, which obviously will come back to life as we get into a more normal environment. That's a very interesting customer. SoFi has done a pretty good job. We you know, we haven't seen anyone really do a good job of converting in-school borrowers into you know, multi-product customers. It seems SoFi has done a pretty good job of converting that refinance borrower into a multi-product customer. Do you have any long-term thoughts on what the real value of that refinance might be and what that customer might look like and what else you might be able to do with the customer, or is that still kind of an open question? Well, I think you're spot on in terms of the opportunities here. This is, I think, a very attractive customer from multiple characteristics here, right? High income, relatively young, and on a pretty steep upward trajectory in terms of earnings capacity. I think one of the other pieces that we think is extremely valuable here is the Net Promoter Scores that we see from customers in this space. Because we are, you know, effectively taking what they see as a burden, right? Making payments on something they've already consumed, and we're lowering that. The NPS that we see from our customers are typically in the high 70s, low 80s type of range. We do believe that that has the, gives us the potential to be able to sell or cross-market other products or services to that customer base over time. I think we might take a slightly different approach to this space in that we would be looking to do this with partners rather than doing it ourselves. Primarily because we'd be, I think, looking for earnings coming from that activity. You know, but we definitely see that as something that would be an opportunity for us to look at as that customer base becomes more meaningful in size. You know, and we don't end up, you know, clearly don't wanna dilute our focus in terms of what's really originating the high-quality volume in the first place. Yeah, your comment is interesting in that SoFi has a lot of touch points with their customers, but they don't make any money doing it. Obviously, by going and establishing affiliate relationships, you could overcome that problem. Right. That's right. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. I will turn the call back over to Mr. Nathan Rutledge. Thanks, Renz. We'd like to thank everyone for joining us on today's call. Please contact me if you have any other questions. This concludes today's call. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.