Ladies and gentlemen, good morning and welcome to the Origin Bancorp Inc. First Quarter earnings conference call. My name is David, and I will be your EverCall Coordinator. The format of today's call includes prepared remarks from the company, followed by a question-and-answer session. Please note that this event is being recorded and that all participants will be on a listen-only mode until the Q&A portion of today's call. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Chris Reigelman, Director of Investor Relations. Please, Chris, go ahead. Good morning, and thank you for joining us today. We issued our earnings press release yesterday afternoon, a copy of which is available on our website along with the slide presentation that we were referred to during this call. Please refer to page 2 of our slide presentation, which includes our Safe Harbor statements regarding forward-looking statements and use of non-GAAP financial measures. For those of you joining by phone, please note the slide presentation is available on our website at www.origin.bank. Please also note that our Safe Harbor statements are available on page 5 of our earnings release filed with the SEC yesterday. All comments during today's call are subject to Safe Harbor statements in our slide presentation and earnings release. I'm joined this morning by Origin Bancorp's Chairman, President, and CEO, Drake Mills, President and CEO of Origin Bank, Lance Hall, our Chief Financial Officer, Wally Wallace, Chief Risk Officer, Jim Crotwell, our Chief Accounting Officer, Steve Brolly, and our Chief Credit and Banking Officer, Preston Moore. After the presentation, we'll be happy to address any questions you may have. Drake, the call is yours. Thanks, Chris. This past quarter, we showed good progress as our teams continued to improve efficiency and performance with a sharp focus on maximizing shareholder value. I'm very pleased with the production our teams experienced across our footprint as each demonstrated resilience amidst challenging market conditions with good loan and deposit growth. Our continued organic growth reflects our strategy and progress in building long-term relationships with our customers. We finished the quarter with pre-tax, pre-provision earnings of $31.9 million and diluted EPS of $0.73. Tangible book value grew 2% to $29.24, and our TCE ratio was 9.3% at the end of the quarter. Lance will get into more specifics, but I'm optimistic about our deposit growth. Excluding brokered deposits, we saw an increase of $102 million for the quarter. This is a testament to our bankers' understanding of our strategy and delivering. While loan growth exceeded core deposit growth this quarter, deposit growth remains a top priority and will be the governor to the loan growth for the year. As we discussed in previous calls, we continue to make investments and strategic decisions in preparation for crossing the $10 billion asset threshold. At the end of the year, we made the decision to write down the value of our MSR asset and explore its potential sale. During the first quarter, we were successful in selling the MSR asset. This removed volatility from our earnings stream and will reduce regulatory risk as we prepared to cross $10 billion in assets. While we are pleased with the results of this quarter, we are strategically focused on improving our profitability. We continue to identify opportunities to drive revenue and better leverage our expense base. Whether it's investments in new markets like our recent entry into South Alabama and the Florida Panhandle or the steps we've recently taken to revamp our mortgage business, Origin is committed to building a more efficient and more profitable company. Now I'll turn it over to Lance. Thanks and good morning. Our bankers have been extremely focused on deposit growth throughout all of our markets, and they understand our commitment to fully funding loan growth with customer deposits. I'm pleased with the efforts of our bankers to drive deposit growth in the first quarter. Based on these trends, I'm seeing across our markets, I remain confident that we will achieve this goal for the year. As a strategic differentiator, we continue to believe that our geographic management model is the most effective structure to deliver for our clients, to build communities, and to have empowered leaders and decision-makers throughout our organization. To this point, this past quarter, we made this strategic decision to realign our treasury management model to better serve our geographic strategy. This will more effectively scale our dynamic treasury management team for the future when there are additional markets built, banking teams hired, or banks acquired. While our treasury management team has been highly successful, we believe this will expand our ability to drive additional deposits and fee income growth while being more efficient. We also remain strategically committed to our client selection philosophy. We talk often with our bankers about being trusted advisors and building unwavering loyalty with our clients. This applies to the full relationship and the need to drive deposit and loan growth. I've talked often about how we are using technology to enhance the client experience and drive efficiencies across our company. We continue to see positive results, one of which is with our robotic process automation team. Through the use of bots, we have saved approximately 3,100 hours of manual work in the first quarter of 2024. That's about 50% of what we saved for the entire year in 2023. These efforts not only save time and make us more efficient but also reduce risk to the company. As an example, we have prevented $thousands in fraud loss while delivering for our clients using our mobile deposit bot. Since we began using this bot, we have reduced mobile deposit fraud loss by 84% year-over-year. Currently, we have approximately 50 automation processes in production with our RPA team, and I'm very optimistic about what they will continue to do as we move forward. Before I turn it over to Jim, I want to acknowledge our employees and their commitment to our culture. Every year, we designate March as Culture Month, where, as a company, we celebrate our culture, reflect on our accomplishments, and lay out our strategic plan for the year. The passion and energy that our employees have right now across all of our markets is impressive. We talk about our culture often. It has become a competitive differentiator for us in driving employee engagement and attracting best-in-class bankers. We will never lose sight of our commitment to our culture and building long-term relationships. Now, I will turn it over to Jim. Thanks, Lance. As reflected on slide 13, I am pleased to report continued sound credit metrics for the quarter. Past-due loans held for investment came in at 0.42% at quarter-end, up eight basis points from the prior quarter, and continue to be within historically acceptable levels. Non-performing loans increased $10.3 million for the quarter while coming in at 0.51% as a percentage of total loans held for investment, up from 0.39% at year-end, while classified loans increased only $3.7 million, coming in at 1.07% as a percentage of total loans held for investment, up only two basis points from the prior quarter and down 10 basis points from Q1 2023 levels. The $10.3 million increase in non-performing was primarily driven by 12 relationships being placed on non-accrual during the quarter, including seven C&I borrowers contributing $4.7 million and five CRE borrowers contributing $3.7 million. The current levels of both non-performing and classified loans also continue to be within historically acceptable levels. Net charge-offs totaled 0.13% per quarter compared to 0.10% for the prior quarter and benefited from $4.1 million in recoveries during Q1. Of note, as part of an agreed-upon workout plan for one relationship, we applied $2.8 million of recoveries from one loan against another loan in the same relationship. As such, adjusted charge-offs and recoveries would be $3.8 million and $1.2 million respectively, with no impact to net charge-offs for the quarter. Our level of charge-offs continues to be in line with our expectations. For the quarter, our allowance for credit losses increased $1.5 million to $98.4 million, resulting in a slight percentage change from the prior quarter to 1.25% from 1.26% as a percentage of total loans held for investments. Net of mortgage warehouse, our reserve ratio also reflected a slight percentage change from the prior quarter to 1.30% from 1.31%. The dollar increase in the reserve for the quarter was driven by loan growth as well as the required reserve attributed to the increase in non-performing loans. The stable level of our allowance mirrors the balancing of our continued sound credit metrics with the ongoing economic headwinds. On slide 14, we have updated the additional information on our CRE office portfolio. As of quarter-end, this segment of our portfolio totaled $377.8 million, with an average loan size of only $2.3 million. Weighted average debt service coverage was 1.34x, while weighted average loan-to-value was 59.5%. We had no past dues, no classifieds, no non-performing, and no charge-offs. This sector continues its strong financial performance. In summary, while we are experiencing normalization in our credit metrics, our portfolio continues its overall sound performance driven by our constant focus on relationship banking. I'll now turn it over to Wally. Thanks, Jim, and good morning, everyone. Turning to the financial highlights, in Q1 we reported diluted earnings per share of $0.73. On an adjusted basis, Q1 EPS were also $0.73 after excluding a $410,000 gain on sale of our MSR and a $403,000 loss on securities sold during the quarter. Starting with deposits, total deposits grew 3.1% during the quarter. Excluding brokered, deposits grew 1.3%, which is in line with last quarter's 1.3% growth. We continue to see a shift of non-interest-bearing deposits into interest-bearing accounts, though we believe this trend is stabilizing. We still forecast some continued pressure to our non-interest-bearing deposit mix over the next couple of quarters, but we currently forecast it to remain above 20%. Notably, while pricing pressures still exist, they are easing, which we expect will remain a stabilizing factor in our net interest margin forecasts. Gross loans held for investment grew 3.1% during the quarter. Excluding mortgage warehouse, loans grew 2.3%. This growth was above our expectations but was driven in large part by construction projects funding, which should abate as the year progresses. While loan growth was greater than deposit growth ex-brokered, we continue to expect loan growth in the mid-single digits for the year, with deposit growth essentially matching. Net interest margin was flat for the quarter at 3.19%, in line with our guidance of ±1 basis point. Moving forward, we anticipate net interest margin should be flat to up slightly, with momentum for margin expansion building as the year progresses due to asset repricing benefits. We believe these benefits are enough to offset 2-3 25-basis point Fed rate cuts, even assuming a zero deposit beta on our non-indexed interest-bearing deposits. As a reminder, in an environment where the Fed is easing, we still expect we can run our business at a net interest margin above 3% with a longer-term full-cycle target over 3.5%. Shifting to non-interest income, we reported $17.3 million in Q1. Excluding the previously mentioned $410,000 gain on sale of our MSR and $403,000 loss on securities sold, our adjusted non-interest income was $17.2 million in Q1, up from $14.6 million in Q4, which excluded a $1.8 million write-down of our MSR and a $4.6 million loss on securities sold. Seasonal strength in our insurance business and increased production in our mortgage segment were the primary drivers of this increase. Our non-interest expense decreased to $58.7 million in Q1 from $60.9 million in Q4. The quarter benefited by a net of roughly $1.1 million in items that, while normal in the course of business, are non-recurring in nature. As such, while we remain laser-focused on managing our operating expense levels, we continue to expect expense growth in the mid-single digit range in 2024 compared to 2023. Turning to capital, we note that our TCE ratio remained above 9% in Q1, ending flat to Q4 at 9.3%. Furthermore, as shown on slide 24 of our investor presentation, all of our regulatory capital levels at both the bank and holding company level remain above levels considered well-capitalized, even if we were to include our AOCI loss in the calculations. As such, we remain confident that we have the capital flexibility to take advantage of any potential future capital deployment opportunities to drive value for our shareholders. With that, I will now turn it back to Drake. Thanks, Wally. I like the energy and momentum our company is building. Our efforts are pointed towards our goal of being a high-performing financial institution whose culture and client experience are unmatched. We remain focused on our plan of achieving that goal. We acknowledge the challenges within our industry but also acknowledge that we have the production teams and management to overcome any challenges we may face and have built a company that our employees, customers, community, and shareholders can be proud of. Thank you for being on the call. We'll open it up for questions. Thank you, team. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we will conduct the question-and-answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press either star one on your telephone keypad, or if you've joined via web, press the raise hand icon on the right side of your DRS screen. Once again, that'll be star one on your telephone keypad to enter the queue, or the raise hand icon on the right side of your Deal Roadshow screen. We'll pause here briefly to allow any questions to generate. Our first question comes from Matt from Stephens. Your line is open. Hey, thanks. Good morning, everybody. Good morning, Matt. I want to make sure I understand the impact of the MSR sale. I assume within that mortgage line item, it will now just include the income from the sale of mortgage loans and origination fees. Is that right? A ny color on what that's looked like over the last few quarters? Just trying to get a better idea of what the mortgage line could look like now without that servicing volatility. Yep, thanks, Matt. T he reason that we sold the servicing business was because that, while on an underlying basis, it ran at slight profitability over time, it was very volatile from quarter- to- quarter due to hedging of the MSR. We didn't like that volatility in our earnings stream, and so that was really what drove the decision to sell the asset. R ather than give you the numbers over the back half, looking back, why don't we just say that with the way we're running our mortgage business now, which is really a community bank mortgage model, we made some changes to right-size the business at the end of last year, and we anticipate running in the $1 million-$1.5 million in revenue per quarter, which would be kind of a break-even run rate. We think running break-even right now at this point in the cycle is acceptable with the anticipation that when mortgage rates come back in, and we'll be there for whatever volume comes, and we'll accept a break-even run rate. O n the expense side, we would anticipate we'd take out about $400,000-$500,000 a quarter, but we anticipated the sale of this business in our guidance. W e're not encouraging you to reduce your expenses from where you were before. Okay. Perfect. Thanks for that, Wally. I also wanted to ask about just overall capital. We're seeing a nice build of capital levels over the last few quarters of last year. I think that CET1 ratio is now close to 12%. I would think that would give you a lot more flexibility to do something. We'd love to get your updated thoughts on deployment of capital, how you're thinking about M&A, securities restructuring, buybacks. It just seems like you have a lot of flexibility. Just curious kind of what your thoughts there are? Thanks. Yeah, thank you, Matt. Drake. For us, we announced early in the year our expansion into South Alabama and the Florida Panhandle, and we really have high expectations. What an awesome team we've been able to put together, and just really pleased with the start of their business and what they're going to do. W e have that. We also feel that as you look at things, as we see some momentum on the deposit side, and certainly our teams are focused on creating deposit, we think we can get back to growth numbers going into 2025 that have been historical for us. If you look at those opportunities with the thought that as multiples as we do take care of our business and focus on performance, and we start to see a multiple return with relationships we have, that those are going to be opportunities for us. As we focus on and I think this is important internally as we say, "Who are we today, and what are we going to do?" There's certainly pressure as you cross over $10 billion to get to a point of an asset base that allows you to get back to profitability and focus. We've worked really hard internally on the expense side as we start to build up or complete the buildup to cross over $10 billion. We understand that we need to get to that $15 billion number fairly quickly to be able to recognize performance we expect. That's certainly going to have to come through some M&A activity. Where that's not front of mind right this moment, we think that our ability to use capital to M&A and growth in our expansion markets, plus what we are seeing in Texas, that I would like to focus on capital use that way. Okay. Thanks, Drake, for the commentary there. T hen just lastly from me on the deposit cost, I think the interest-bearing deposit costs were up 13 basis points this quarter. I think the commentary included some additional pressure but easing from more recent levels. Any other color you can add as far as what your expectations are on deposit costs from here? Thanks. Yeah. Hey, Matt Olney. This is Lance. I think some of it's going to be timing, and some of it's going to be which markets we're seeing the growth in. I'm really proud of our presidents. We challenged all of our markets to make sure they could self-fund in 2024. O ne of the reasons between a little bit of higher cost is tougher competition in Dallas and Houston, and that's where we saw the majority of our growth. Some of that is seasonal based on what we see in North Louisiana. We're still seeing a competitive advantage where in North Louisiana, interest-bearing deposits, we're able to get it about 50 basis points lower than we are in Texas, so that's great for us. I would agree with what Wally's commentary. It feels like the market is being a little more receptive to normalizing deposit cost. For us, we feel there's short and long-term value in maintaining a franchise that has sub-90% loan-to-deposit ratios, excluding mortgage warehouse. C ontinuing to grow liquidity, continuing to grow deposits is job number one. The offset is we've done a really good job with disciplined loan pricing and our ability to continue to maintain and not see reduction in NIM. And actually, we think we'll see potentially a little bit of NIM expansion as we go forward. O ur deposit franchise is paying off, and I'm proud of what we're doing. Okay. Thanks for that, Lance. I'll have back in the queue. Congrats on the quarter. Thank you, Matt. Thank you, Matt. Our next question comes from Michael from Raymond James. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. Just wanted to start off on this quarter's loan and deposit growth. I f I look at mortgage warehouse, you guys annualized to a little over 9%, and then deposit growth was double-digit annualized. I know you talked about reiterating the guidance. What's driving the projected slowdown? Is it just less fund-ups of construction loans, which look to be a big driver this quarter? T hen on the deposit side, just given the stronger start, should we expect higher than what you've guided before, which is essentially matching loan growth? Thanks. Yeah. Hey, this is Lance. Thanks a lot for that. No, I still think we still believe guidance is the accurate way to look at it. There is no question that we've done a really good job, in my opinion, the last few years of onboarding through our client selection process, some really good customers. Texas is such a competitive advantage for us, and that's where we continue to see the loan growth opportunities. We really benefited in Q1 in two ways. One was the funding up of some construction projects that we feel really strongly about. A lso, we had utilization on our C&I lines increase from what was a little bit subnormal to a more normal usage, which created some of our funding a little bit quicker than we thought it was going to be. It's a little bit of a balance for us in the sense that we feel like because of our locations, because of the bankers we have in Texas, we have great loan growth opportunity, but we're disciplined on this and going to continue to govern that by smart and strategic deposit growth. T hat's the driver for us, is making sure that we can fund it the appropriate way. Very helpful. T hen maybe for Wally, just looking at the margin, I think you said 2 cuts-3 cuts this year is now the expectation. You expect the margin can grind higher. I f I go back to your comments from last quarter, I don't think you were assuming any cuts. I f we did get cuts, you could see, at least for the first 100 basis points, around 15 basis points-20 basis points of NIM pressure. T his seems to be a nice step up. Can you just walk us through maybe what's changed in your modeling, whether it's deposit betas, growth assumptions, etc.? Thanks. Yep. Thanks. Good morning, Mike. We actually haven't changed any expectations in our model as it relates to Fed cuts. We've put one cut in our own forecast. The commentary that we provide, since it seems like expectations are, one, all over the place, and two, changing constantly, I just don't know what people are going to put in their models. W e think that we could offset two, maybe three cuts and still see margin expansion if the Fed were to cut. As far as the puts and takes in our model, our deposit cost expectations were a little bit higher than we had anticipated. However, to Lance's point, we have asked our markets to be very conscious about how they price their loans, and we're seeing our loan yields have also been coming in better than our expectations. Net-net, the margin has been performing as we had anticipated. There's some puts and takes in there, but our expectations really haven't changed. Okay. Great. I'll step back. Thanks for taking my questions. Thank you. Thank you, Michael. Our next question comes from Woody from KBW. Your line is open. Hey, good morning, guys. Good morning, Woody. Wanted to start out with noninterest-bearing deposits. It looks like that remix is beginning to flow, and you sounded pretty optimistic in your opening comments. J ust any color you can give on sort of the monthly trends you're seeing in the Noninterest-Bearing segment? Morning, Woody. For the last 5 quarters, we have been building an expectation that we'd see a shift in our non-interest-bearing mix. We had done a study where we went back and looked at our portfolio. The last time Fed funds was near rates where we are today, and the last time we'd seen a kind of a meaningful period of tightening. Our expectations have pretty consistently been that we would see that mix start to kind of stabilize in the low 20% range. The deterioration or the change in that mix has moved exactly as we expected. However, every quarter, it's done a little bit better than we were modeling. W e're still modeling and anticipating that the mix will bottom in that low 20% range. And we were pleased this quarter to see it come in at right around 22%. We were closer to 21.5%. That trend is we're seeing it stabilizing just like we're seeing the stabilization and the rate of change of our deposit costs increasing. S-T he trends that we're seeing give us some, I guess, increased confidence in our own forecasts. Hopefully, that helps answer your question. Yeah, that's helpful. T hen could you just remind me how you think about funding the mortgage warehouse? Was the increase in the warehouse in the quarter part of the reason what drove the higher brokered deposits? Yeah. Y es, Woody. We will fund the mortgage warehouse with whatever wholesale funding is at our disposal and is the cheapest. R ight now, brokered funding is the more optimal use of funding that business. I f the FHLB market improves relative to brokered, then we would shift to FHLB. Also note, though, that we target 90 or sub loan-to-deposit ratio, and that's important to us as well. It's worth noting that right now, the mortgage warehouse business is actually our most profitable business just because we can fund it with wholesale, but it turned so quickly. W e did a lot of work last year working with our customers on how we price that business, and it's a very strong and profitable business for us today. All right. Then last for me, I wanted to touch on expenses. I think in your opening comments, you call out sort of $1 million of non-recurring items in the quarter. Just any color you can give on sort of what those items were? Yeah. Look, there was just a handful of things that happened from quarter to quarter and year- to- year, and we just happened to have a handful of them this quarter. There was a legal recovery. We had a fraud recovery. We had a reversal of an accrual related to incentives. I t was a kind of combination of a lot of little things that added up to about $1.1 million. A s you think about your model, I would still look at that fourth-quarter run rate and think about kind of a growth rate off of that. I wouldn't use the first quarter as your base for your growth expectations in the back half of the year. W e took our forecast and kept our second, third, and fourth quarter the same. Our full year came down by that $1.1 million that we exceeded our expectations with. All right. That's all for me. Thanks for taking my questions. Thank you, Woody. O ur next question comes from Manuel at D.A. Davidson. Your line is open. Hey, I think you kind of covered my question on expenses. I was going to lean towards, could you come in at the low end of the guide, but it sounds like you're taking out these one-time expense items, and it works out that it doesn't really change the guide. Is that the right way to take this? Yes, Manuel. We're one quarter into the year. We were pleased with our expense management in the first quarter, but we don't want to use that and get overexuberant and have expectations drop to the low end of the range. We think that the guidance we gave is appropriate still at this point. Could you expand on your comments on getting a little bit better loan yields? You're pushing to get better loan yields. J ust how is that working out competitively? Is that any issues at this point? I mean, growth is really strong, so it can't be that big of a deal. J ust kind of thoughts on loan pricing and loan yield development across the year. Yeah. Yeah, this is Lance. Again, I think through really clearly understanding our strategic plan, understanding where sort of the banking is from a cycle perspective, we've just got some dynamic presidents that understand sort of running their markets, kind of what the message is and what their primary goal is right now, which is grow core deposit clients, take very minimal risk in the credit portfolio, and really focus on margin. T here is no growth for growth's sake that's going on inside of Origin right now. It's very targeted, very focused. A s we govern growth with liquidity, we also are governing growth through yield. M y hats off to our presidents because they have clearly understood and carried that message to the bankers. A again, I keep going back to it. Texas creates that opportunity for us. There's a lot of demand. There's a lot of great projects. As we highlighted in our investor deck, the migration of corporate clients and consumers into our marketplace continues to create opportunity for us because of our footprint that other banks probably don't have the luxury of, which is allowing us to be more disciplined on loan pricing. Okay. I appreciate the comments. Thank you. Thank you. O nce again, ladies and gentlemen, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad or the raised hand icon on the right side of your Deal Roadshow screen. Our next question is a follow-up from Matt from Stephens. Your line is open. Yeah, guys. Yeah, thanks for the follow-up. Drake, earlier you mentioned that the bank has strong momentum on the organic growth side, and there's a desire to return to growth numbers that have been more historical at the bank once you get to 2025. Appreciate that 2025 still a ways away, but just remind us kind of how you think about historical growth numbers and what's realistic as the new teams that you've hired start to grow in 2025? Yeah. Thank you, Matt. Realistic growth for us is average in 10% a year. We feel like we've built our infrastructure. Everything from philosophy to teams we have is built to grow at 10% per year. We think our capital growth and current capital levels allow us to do that. I f we could return to that, we think the expansion opportunities and why we made the decision, first off, that team, just exceptional people that their culture matched our culture and everything else. I f you apply that to historical growth rates and our ability to go into markets, we see the same opportunities in South Alabama and Florida Panhandle that we saw in Texas in 2008, 2009, and 2010, and then 2013 and 2014 and going into Houston. If I look at those opportunities and believe that we see some liquidity coming back in the industry, and I think as rates come down, that certainly sets us up well to be competitive and to be able to drive funding to where we could return to a 10% growth rate. If you look at current pipeline opportunities, even with a slight slowdown, if we looked at everything the way we did, let's say, in 2019, 2020, 2021, we would be growing at a 10% clip today if we had that funding opportunity. I look forward to getting back to those numbers, but we certainly have the infrastructure. Our teams are running about 50%, maybe 55% capacity. W e have a lot of capacity internally to be able to accomplish that. Just following up there, Drake, I think the guidance this year for loan and deposit growth, still that mid-single-digit level that we talked about earlier. I think last time on the call in January, we said that did not include any impact or benefits from this newer team. Is that right? Is that still your expectation for 2024? That is correct, Matt. Exactly. Okay. Perfect. Thanks for the follow-up. Thank you. Thank you, Matt. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the question-and-answer session. I'll now pass it back to Drake Mills for any additional remarks. Thank you so much for being on the call today. W e are very pleased, and we recognize we had a good quarter, but we still understand that we have to focus on performance. T hat's performance without slowing momentum. I'm pleased with the team's focus and performance, and I look forward to, as I was just talking with Matt, stronger growth as we go moving to 2025. Our expansion into South Alabama and Florida Panhandle has been exceptional for us to start off. W e do recognize that we have to earn our cost of capital plus. T he focus internally is truly on performance, and it's on the right type of performance. As we prepare ourselves to cross over $10 billion, when we get to that point, I think we're going to be prepared, and we're going to be in a position to be able to perform at a level that provides cost of capital plus. I appreciate everyone's confidence in us being on the call today. If anyone has any other questions, we're open for comments. Appreciate everyone's opportunity to spend time with you today. Look forward to seeing you in the future. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's Origin Bancorp Inc. First Quarter earnings conference call. Thank you, and have a great day.