Welcome and thank you for joining Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation and Oaktree Strategic Income II, Inc. Merger Conference Call. Today's conference call is being recorded. At this time, all participants are in listen- only mode, but will be prompted for a question- and- answer session following the prepared remarks. Now, I would like to introduce Michael Mosticchio, Head of Investor Relations, who will host today's conference call. Mr. Mosticchio, you may begin. Thank you, Marlise, and hello, everyone. Before we begin, I want to remind you that comments on today's call include forward-looking statements reflecting our current views with respect to, among other things, the timing or likelihood of the proposed merger closing, the expected synergies and savings associated with the merger, the ability to realize the anticipated benefits of the merger, and our future operating results and financial performance. Our actual results could differ materially from those implied or expressed in the forward-looking statements. Please refer to Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation's and Oaktree Strategic Income II, Inc.'s SEC filings for a discussion of these factors in further detail. The companies undertake no duty to update or revise any forward-looking statements. I'd also like to remind you that nothing on this call constitutes an offer to sell or solicitation of an offer to purchase any interest in any Oaktree fund. Investors and others should note that Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation uses the investor section of its corporate website to announce material information. The company encourages investors, the media, and others to review the information that is shared on its website. With that, I would now like to turn the call over to Matt Pendo. Thanks, Mike, and welcome everyone. Thank you all for joining us today. With me are Armen Panossian, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Investment Officer, Matt Stewart, Chief Operating Officer, and Chris McKown, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. This morning, Oaktree Specialty Lending Corporation, or OCSL, and Oaktree Strategic Income II, Inc., or OSI Two, issued a joint press release announcing that they have entered into a merger agreement pursuant to which OSI Two will merge with and into OCSL. We also posted a presentation outlining this transaction on the investor relations page of the OCSL website. On the call today, I'll provide you an overview of the merger and our strategic rationale for pursuing it. Armen will then discuss what each vehicle brings to the combination, and then he will share details about the combined portfolio. As some of you may know, nearly two years ago, we announced the merger of our two then publicly traded BDCs, OCSL and Oaktree Strategic Income Corporation. We articulated a series of reasons for carrying out the merger, including benefits of being a larger, more scaled BDC, improved access to debt capital markets, better trading liquidity and ROE accretion, all of which have come to fruition. Since closing the deal in March 2021, OCSL's ROE has steadily grown. It's increased its dividend six times, its stock has become more liquid, and it has been able to further diversify its capital structure. As was the case in the prior merger, we see this transaction as providing the same benefits to stockholders of both OSI II and OCSL. OSI II is a privately offered BDC that launched in the summer of 2018 through a non-public fundraising effort with Morgan Stanley's wealth management organization. It received just over $330 million of commitment from over 1,700 investors with an average commitment size of $190,000, and the vehicle held its final close in the fall of 2018. As of June 30, it had $604 million of assets and $325 million of net asset value. Both companies have the same investment mandate, and as a result, over 97% of OSI II's portfolio investments are also in OCSL's portfolio. Both share in having excellent credit quality, with no investments on non-accrual as of June 30. Let me now touch on the key terms of the merger, which can be found on slide four of the presentation. Under the terms of the merger agreement, OSI II stockholders will receive an amount of shares of OCSL common stock based upon the net asset values of each company at the time of closing. In essence, this will be a NAV for NAV exchange, which will result in ownership split of the combined company proportional to each of OCSL's and OSI II's respective net asset values. Each is determined shortly before closing. For illustrative purposes, based on June 30, 2022, net asset values, and excluding transaction costs and any tax-related distributions, OCSL would have issued approximately 2.71 shares of its common stock for each outstanding share of OSI Two common stock, resulting in a pro forma ownership split of 79.5% for current stockholders of OCSL and 20.5% for current stockholders of OSI Two. Oaktree is providing significant support to this transaction and has agreed to waive $9 million of base management fees as follows. $6 million at a rate of $1.5 million per quarter in the first year following closing of the merger, and $3 million at a rate of $750,000 per quarter in the second year following closing of the merger. Prior to closing, each of OCSL and OSI II boards of directors intends to declare and pay ordinary course quarterly distributions. The merger is expected to close in the second fiscal quarter of 2023, subject to stockholder approval and satisfaction of other closing conditions as outlined in the merger agreement. Now turning to page 6 of the presentation, we describe why we believe the merger is compelling to each company. First, it will create a larger, more scaled BDC, which is with just over $3 billion in total assets and over $1.5 billion of net assets. OCSL will become a top 10 publicly traded BDC by total assets and is expected to experience improved trading liquidity, therefore making the stock more attractive to institutional investors. This may also lead to expanded equity research coverage. Second, the transaction represents a merger between two highly complementary portfolios that we are very familiar with. We've been managing both portfolios for several years, which gives us confidence in our ability to integrate the two portfolios seamlessly. The combination will result in an improvement in portfolio metrics as OCSL's first lien investments will increase to 73% of the portfolio at fair value, and the top ten investment concentration will modestly decrease for the combined company. Third, the combined company should have greater access to more diverse, lower- cost sources of debt, including institutional unsecured bond financing. In addition, we have spoken with lenders of both companies who have indicated they are supportive of the merger. The leverage ratio for the combined company will be the same as OCSL's existing target of 0.9-1.25 times. We anticipate that the combined company will be within this leverage target at closing, as the current pro forma net leverage at June 30th is approximately 1.0x. We believe the combined company will continue to have strong liquidity and capital to deploy as investment opportunities arise. Finally, the transaction is expected to be immediately accretive to net investment income. We expect the combined company will generate approximately $1.6 million of operational synergies annually as certain fixed costs at OSI II will be eliminated, and interest expense savings will result from a streamlined capital structure. In addition, the larger asset base of the combined company should result in a lower expense ratio. With that, I'll turn the call over to Armen. Thanks, Matt, and hello, everyone. To echo Matt, this is a compelling merger that we believe will create meaningful value for stockholders of both OCSL and OSI II. The combination creates important scale, improved portfolio metrics, and cost-saving opportunities to bolster profitability. For those investors who may not be familiar with OSI II, the company's investment approach is the same as OCSL's, investing primarily in senior secured loans to performing middle-market borrowers in both the private placement and the public debt markets. In fact, 97% of OSI II's portfolio investments are also in OCSL's portfolio, as the company has been co-investing with OCSL and other Oaktree entities since its inception. As of June 30, 2022, the company held $567 million of investments across 115 portfolio companies. 84% of these investments were first lien, and 13% were second lien. The remaining 3% was invested in equity and unsecured debt. Its weighted average yield on debt investments was 9.4% as of June 30, in line with the OCSL yield of 9.3%. OSI II has generated strong performance over the last four years. It delivered a 9.3% return on adjusted net investment income over the last 12 months, and it had no investments on non-accrual status as of June 30. Now I would like to talk about the combined portfolio and its expected benefits to both sets of stockholders. The combination of OCSL and OSI II would create a larger and somewhat more diversified portfolio with respect to the number of individual borrowers and concentration of holdings. OCSL and OSI II would have had investments in nearly 160 borrowers as of June 30. The combined portfolio would increase the amount of first lien investments in OCSL to 73%, up from 70%. Additionally, the top ten portfolio companies as a percentage of fair value are expected to be about 22%, down slightly from 23% for OCSL. Just to emphasize again, the credit quality of the combined portfolio would be extremely strong. Additionally, the significant amount of investment overlap between the two portfolios will help to facilitate the seamless integration of the companies. Because Oaktree's strategic credit strategy manages both investment portfolios, the diligence concerns normally present in non-affiliated mergers and acquisitions are essentially eliminated. Looking ahead, our investment strategy and overall approach at OCSL will not change. Rather, this transaction represents a way to grow OCSL and delivers the several benefits that we just described. We remain focused on maintaining our high- quality and more conservatively positioned portfolio, investing defensively while seeking out favorable risk-reward opportunities. Before wrapping up the call, I wanted to discuss the process and expected timeline of the transaction. In order to consummate the merger, we intend to seek approval from the stockholders of both OCSL and OSI II. The companies plan to file a joint proxy statement and prospectus with the SEC, and are hoping to hold a stockholder meeting for each company in the second fiscal quarter of 2023 and in March. If we receive approval from both sets of shareholders, we expect to close the transaction very soon thereafter. In conclusion, we believe this merger represents a great opportunity for stockholders of both OCSL and OSI II. We anticipate that it will create a larger, more scaled BDC with increased trading liquidity, potentially broaden our institutional stockholder base, and improve access to lower- cost sources of debt. We also expect that it will drive meaningful immediate NII accretion. Again, we thank you in advance for your support and expect to complete this transaction in a timely manner. We are excited about the future of the combined company and look forward to continuing to deliver attractive risk-adjusted returns to our stockholders. We also want to thank you for joining us on today's call and for your continued interest in OCSL. With that, operator, please open the lines for questions. Thank you. We will now begin the question- and- answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we will pause for a moment, receive the questions, and then assemble our roster. Thank you. Okay. Our first question is coming from Kevin Fultz, JMP Securities. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. You know, within the OSI II portfolio, is there a portion that would be considered non-core and that you'd be looking to rotate out of either before the merger closes or following the closing of the merger? Thanks, Kevin. This is Armen. No, there really isn't a non-core portfolio there because it was a de novo portfolio put together by Oaktree, you know, over the last four or so years, and consistent with how we've been originating and allocating to OCSL. I expected. Just one more. What% of the OSI II portfolio is invested in liquid investments? I don't know if Matt Stewart is on the line; he can answer that. Let me, Kevin, we'll probably have to get back to you on that. I just don't. Hi. About a third of the portfolio. About a third of the portfolio is in liquid investments. Very similar to what's in OCSL, given the 97% overlap. Yep, that makes sense. I'll leave it there. Thank you for taking my questions. Thank you. Our next question is coming from Ryan Lynch from KBW. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. I just had two questions today. The first one was regarding the liability stack. Is the plan to take on OSI II's credit facility and to keep that running, or do you plan to cap that? Then, longer term, I guess, when you look at the pro forma of the two liability structures today, since OSI II is all credit facility debt, would you like to eventually balance that out with more unsecured debt? Or what are the thoughts longer term on that? Hi, it's Matt Stewart here. We have two credit facilities within OSI II. Currently, we have a revolver and then a drop-down SPV, as you noted. We've been in discussions with both lenders there. They're both very supportive of the transaction. The current plan is, as of right now, to take out the small, syndicated revolver and bring that on the balance sheet. We'll save interest expense there, and then we'll bring over the other SPV and put it alongside our current SPV that's sitting within OCSL. Longer term, we may look to merge those and save some costs. For right now, we'll bring over the one and extinguish the other at closing. Longer term, we'll continue to evaluate all sources of financing within the BDC. We'll see how the market conditions are next year, but right now that's our plan. Gotcha. Then the other question that I had, and I think that this, you know, merger makes a lot of sense. I think it's gonna be, you know, increase the size. There are some accretive cost savings. There are some fee waivers which will all make a lot of sense, I think, you know, longer term. But in the near term, when this closes, my question, I wanna make sure I understand correctly what you said. You said that this BDC was raised exclusively through the Morgan Stanley Wealth Management organization. I'm just curious, you know, at any time a private BDC becomes public via either IPO-ing or through some sort of merger, those private shareholders been locked up for several years and they seek liquidity, or they now can seek liquidity if they so choose, so through the public stock, and that could put pressure potentially on the stock price. I'm just curious, if that is the case, you know, have you guys thought about implementing some sort of repurchase agreement or something like that to be able to weather any potential redemptions or private shareholders, you know, that now receive liquidity, potentially selling out? Yeah, Ryan, great question. It's, you know, something that we spend a lot of time thinking about and obviously looking at precedent transactions. In terms of the kind of shareholder base of OSI II, one of the things that's a little different in our OSI II shareholder base versus some of the other kinds of, you know, similar BDCs is that it's all retail. There's no institutional ownership in that vehicle. So, you know, the average commitment size I mentioned by trademarks was $190,000. So it's very dispersed. There are no large holders. You don't have a kind of institutional, you know, whether it's state funds or pension plans who invested in the BDC when it was created with the view that as soon as it is public, they will sell. It's a different dynamic in OSI II that you've seen in others. For that reason, you know, we didn't institute any sort of lockup, and I think it would be actually hard to actually execute that, just given how dispersed the shareholding is. The other thing, in terms of as we think about, kind of the OSI II merging into OCSL, for the OSI II shareholders, you know, they're gonna have an increase in the dividend. They're gonna have obviously the same portfolio, just bigger and more diverse. Better liability structure, as you know, as Matt relayed. I think it's what they have now, but only better. Then your third question is about share repurchases. You know, share repurchase is always something that we'll discuss with the board. For all the reasons I mentioned before, plus in the past, you know, we prefer to keep our capital in investing in assets versus repurchasing stock. We always look at that and talk to the board. I think the kind of fundamental difference is the shareholder base of OSI II is very diverse and it's dispersed. Yep. That all makes sense. I appreciate the time today, and congrats on the merger. Thanks, Ryan. Okay. Our next question is coming from Melissa Wedel from JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Certainly, this proposed transaction seems really familiar, as you guys noted in the OCSI merger. The one difference that sort of does jump out is that the portfolios, I think, with the other one weren't quite as aligned. There was more senior exposure, a little bit lower yielding with OCSI. To that extent, do you think that there is maybe a little bit less potential for the OSI II assets to qualify for JV optimization? Not necessarily. I mean, I think there's some of the OSI II assets that once they merge over into OCSL, we could move into the JV. I don't think there's a big kind of drag, if you will, in terms of JV optimization from this transaction. I think it's positive. You know, I think as we think about the merger and we reflect upon, you know, OCSL and OCSI, you know, everything we thought would happen happened, you know, in terms of greater scale, diversification, liquidity in the stock, access to the unsecured markets. As we think about OSI II and just how similar the portfolios are, and that there is ability to optimize the JVs in it. We just felt extremely confident in the ability to execute on it and the benefits to both sets of shareholders. I think in many ways it's even a better merger target than OCSI, just given one, we've been through it, and two, the optimization. The sizes are actually pretty similar. The and the expense savings are real. There's a fee waiver like we did before. Everything from our perspective lines up really, really well. Okay. Thanks for that. You know, I know that you made the comment that, for both vehicles, you would intend to continue paying normal course dividends. Of course, for OCSL you've been steadily increasing that, for a number of quarters sequentially now. Is there anything about this proposed transaction that would impact the board's thinking about that trajectory sort of continuing? Thank you. Sure, Melissa. There's nothing about this transaction that would change the board's how the board is thinking about dividends going forward. You know, you've seen what we've done historically. Obviously, the dividend is a board decision. As we philosophically think about the dividend, it's a function of the earnings coming out of the asset portfolio. Nothing in this transaction would change that. Thank you. Okay, thank you. And let me remind you that if you still are interested in posing a question, please press star then one. Our next question is coming from Brett Reiss from Janney Montgomery Scott. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi. Thanks for the opportunity to ask a question. 88%, I think, of your loans are adjustable rate. Will that be pretty much the same number after the merger? Yes. This is Armen. It's roughly the same. OCSI, the current floating rate exposure on the asset side, to you know, OCSL is about 88%. It goes up marginally because OSI II does have a slightly higher percentage of floating rate in it. It doesn't meaningfully move the needle. You know, it'll just land a little bit north of 88% on the floating rate. Great. Thank you. Okay. We are concluding the question- and- answer session, and I would like to turn the conference back over to management at this time for some closing remarks. Pardon me. Pardon me. There is still a question. Okay. Melissa Wedel is back, and still has a question from JPMorgan. Go ahead. Sorry about that. I wanted to hop back in the queue after two questions. Very quickly, I was hoping you could also help us understand the thinking behind a sort of two-tiered staggered fee waiver. Thanks so much. Sure, sure. The fee waiver just kind of stepping back. The fee waiver was something that is fairly common in these types of transactions. Something we did in the OCSI merger. We stepped it down in this case versus what we did in OCSI, primarily for what we talked about before. The portfolio here, you know, overlaps 97% with OCSL. There's not. OCSI overlapped a lot less, and there was a lot more rotation of the portfolio that was required. That's why we didn't step down the fee waiver there. In this case that portfolio rotation is very, very small. You know, we have it stepping down after the first year, but it's really designed to give, you know, time for the execution, and just the while we think that the integration will go seamlessly, this just provides a little cushion and benefit to the shareholders by doing that. There are some deal expenses that allows for it, and just some time to execute on it. The biggest difference with the last time was really just the rotation required of the portfolio is a lot less here. Got it. Thanks, Matt. Thank you, Melissa. Okay. Just a reminder, if you have another question for the queue, just press star and one. Okay. Since we have no more questions, I am turning the conference back to Michael Mosticchio, please. Great. Thank you, and thank you all again for joining us on today's call. A replay of this call will be available for 30 days in the investors section of OCSL's website, or by dialing 877-344-7529 for U.S. callers, or 1-412-317-0088 for non-U.S. callers with the replay access code 9719723, beginning approximately 1 hour after this broadcast. Thank you, and we hope you have a great day. This concludes the conference. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.