Good morning. Thank you for joining OFG Bancorp's conference call. My name is Melinda. I will be your operator today. Our speakers are José Rafael Fernández, Chief Executive Officer and Vice Chair of the Board of Directors, and Maritza Arizmendi, Chief Financial Officer. A presentation accompanies today's remarks. It can be found on our investor relations website on the homepage in the What's New box or on the quarterly results page. This call may feature certain forward-looking statements about management's goals, plans, and expectations. These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties outlined in the Risk Factors section of OFG's SEC filings. Actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated. We disclaim any obligation to update information disclosed in this call as a result of developments that occur afterwards. All lines have been placed on mute to prevent background noise. After the speaker's remarks, there will be a question-and-answer session. Instructions will be given at that time. I would now like to turn the call over to Mr. Fernandez. Good morning, and thank you for joining us. We are pleased to report our first quarter 2023 results. All our businesses performed well and contributed to another strong quarterly performance by OFG. The quarter's results also reflect the strength of our franchise, supported by high levels of liquidity and capital. This places OFG in a strong position in today's banking environment. Now let's turn to page three of our conference call presentation. Core revenues, net interest margin, credit quality, operating leverage, and customer acquisition trends all remain at high levels or improved compared to the fourth quarter. Deposit balances were stable with only a 10% cumulative beta. We continued to execute our digital-first strategy, placing more banking kiosks and interactive teller machines in the field. Client digital adoption increased 10% year-over-year. Our key performance metrics also continued at strong levels. Businesses and consumers are in good financial shape in Puerto Rico, and the economy continues to do well. We look forward to ongoing progress in 2023. Thanks to our teams for their excellent execution, commitment and drive, helping customers and the communities we serve achieve their financial goals. Looking at the income statement, earnings per share diluted was $0.96, up 26% year-over-year. Core revenues total $164 million, up 21%. Net interest margin was 5.89%, up 142 basis points. Provision was $9.4 million. Non-interest expenses were $90.2 million. Pre-Provision Net Revenue totaled $74.6 million, up 34%. When we look at our balance sheet, customer deposits were $8.6 billion, up slightly compared to the fourth quarter. Loans held for investment totaled $6.9 billion, also up slightly over the fourth quarter. New loan production remains strong at $561 million. Investments total $1.9 billion, down slightly from the fourth quarter due to the maturities of Treasuries and the normal paydown of mortgage-backed securities. Cash was $847 million, almost $300 million higher than the fourth quarter. We continue to build capital. The CET1 ratio was 14.07% compared to 13.64% in the fourth quarter. All in all, excellent quarter, very strong performance. Here is Maritza to go over the financials in more detail. Thank you, José. Please turn to page four to review our financial highlights. Let me start with total core revenues. Net interest income of $136 million held steady compared to the fourth quarter. This primarily reflected the full effect of Fed's fourth quarter 2022 rate increase of 50 basis points, but only a partial effect of the 50 basis point increase in the first quarter of 2023. Also, higher yields on higher average balances of loans, in particular auto, commercial, and consumer. We did have two fewer days during the quarter compared to the fourth quarter, which reduced net interest income by $2.2 million. Banking and Wealth Management revenues were $29 million compared to $33 million in the fourth quarter. This primarily reflected reduction of $2 million in mortgage-servicing rights valuation, $1 million in Wealth Management revenues from the annual recognition of insurance fees in the December quarter, and a half million dollars from the sale of the retirement plan administration business that we announced at the end of last year. Looking at the efficiency ratio, it was 54.87% in the first quarter. That's a minor change from the first quarter and significantly better compared to a year ago. This reflected our increased positive operating leverage in line with trends we have seen over the last year. Non-interest expenses totaled $90 million compared to $92 million in the fourth quarter. That primarily reflected lower general and administrative costs. In part, that was due to a $500,000 of lower costs as a result of the sale of our pension administration business. Non-interest expenses should continue to average about $90 million-$92 million per quarter in 2023. Our efficiency ratio target should also continue in the mid-50% range. Looking at our performance metrics, return on average asset was 1.87%, and return on average tangible common equity was 19.13%. Looking at tangible book value per share, that was $20.57. That's an increase of about $1 compared to the fourth quarter ago, the fourth quarter. This reflected increased retained earnings and lower other comprehensive loss. Please turn to page five to review our operational highlights. Looking at average loan balances, they increased $96 million from the fourth quarter. End-of-period loans increased $6.85 billion. That is a 1.1% annualized increase from the previous quarter and a 4.7% increase year-over-year. Sequential growth reflected increased balances of auto and consumer loans. This was partially offset by pay downs of residential mortgages and commercial lines of credit. Looking at loan yield, it was 7.58%. That's 26 basis point increase from the fourth quarter. That's due to Fed rate increases combined with a higher proportion of auto, consumer, and commercial loans versus residential mortgages. Looking at new loan originations, this reflected continued high levels of auto lending and increased commercial lending in the U.S. Puerto Rico commercial lending was lower compared to the fourth quarter. Our commercial pipeline remains strong. Looking at core deposits. Compared to the fourth quarter, average balance decreased, end-of-period deposits increased. Over the course of the quarter, we saw a shift from demand deposits to savings accounts, time deposits, and to a lesser degree, to our Wealth Management business. During the quarter, government deposits went down from $295.4 million to $231.4 million. We also saw a marginal decline in retail deposits of 0.3% and a noticeable increase in commercial deposits of 2.3%. Looking at core deposits, that was 53 basis points, an increase of 14 basis points from the quarter ago. So far, our cumulative deposit beta has been about 10%. We expect cumulative betas, deposit beta for, of about 25%, well below expected mainland levels through this cycle. Borrowings increased. That reflected a $200 million two-year advance from the Federal Home Loan Bank. Looking at net interest margin, that was 5.89%, an increase of 20 basis points from last quarter and 142 basis points year-over-year. Our NIM outlook generally remains the same. Our tax rate for the first quarter was 29%. For the year, we're anticipating an effective tax rate of 32%. Please turn to page five, six to review our credit quality and capital strength. Looking at net charge-offs, they totaled $10 million compared to $11 million in the fourth quarter. That reflected a significant reduction in auto loan net charge-offs. In addition, delinquency and non-performing loan rates fell across the board. Looking at provision for credit losses, that totaled $9.4 million, reflecting $6.2 million due to increased loan volume, $2.1 million from a commercial loan held for sale, and a $1.1 million increase adjustment due to increasing recessionary risk in the United States. Looking at non-performing loans, the total NPL rate was 1.32%. That was down 29 basis points from the fourth quarter and 34 basis points from a year ago. Overall, credit improved noticeable from the fourth quarter. Looking at some of our other capital metrics. Total shareholders' equity was $1.1 billion. That's up for $47 million from the fourth quarter, and TCE ratio increased to 9.85%. Here speaks José. Thank you, Maritza. Please turn to page eight for the outlook. The Puerto Rico economy continues to show strength on the part of both businesses and consumers. Business activity is robust and building momentum as reconstruction projects continue to roll out. This is helping to create a more resilient infrastructure, but we must continue to keep a watchful eye on interest rate changes, inflation, and a probable mainland recession. Within this environment, our deposits overall have remained stable with retail customer flows moving to higher-yielding products like CDs and to our Wealth Management business. High levels of liquidity put us in a strong position in the current banking environment, and this enables us to continue to focus on our plans by adding value to our customers and building stronger relationships, investing in people, technology and infrastructure to provide easy, fast, around-the-clock self-service digital solutions for clients, and growing market share in our main businesses. I want to thank again all our dedicated team members for their commitment to the customers and the communities we serve. With this, we end our formal presentation. Operator, please open the call for questions. Thank you. If you have a question at this time, please press star one on your telephone keypad. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, please press star two. We'll pause just briefly to assemble our queue. We go to our first question from Timur Braziler with Wells Fargo. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Good morning. Maybe starting, just on a bigger picture question. Can you take us back to the week of March 13th when things were kind of falling apart on the mainland? What was the feeling on the island? What was the level of conversations you were having with your own deposit base, and ultimately, what was the dynamic that was taking place in Puerto Rico? Sure. Thank you for your question, Timur. I'd like to take the opportunity, receiving your question to kind of share my thoughts on the overall banking environment right now in the United States and how does that translate, if at all, to Puerto Rico. I think that the current banking environment in the United States brings to light, in a very positive way, the differences that exist between Puerto Rico banking market as well as the difference with the peers in the States. I think when you look at the Puerto Rico banking market, what you're seeing and you will see in this quarter, you're gonna see an economy that continues to build momentum and a banking industry that is strong, and it's supportive of the island's economic development with higher capital levels, higher liquidity levels, much more stable deposit trends with lower betas, and really no credit deterioration and/or concentration. All of these compare very favorably to our peers in the States. To your question, I think whenever it was in the middle of March, that the events that transpired in California and New York regarding the two financial institutions in Puerto Rico, the news come, and everybody is aware of it. There is strong understanding that the banking sector in Puerto Rico is solid, and it's rational and efficient. I think, all you guys have been talking about this for a while, and I think this moment in terms of the banking environment in the States, puts a spotlight in a positive way to the Puerto Rico banking market. That's kind of how I view what's going on and what has happened. Certainly, we have a very competitive market here in the island. But it's a market very different from what, the last 25, 30 years investors are accustomed to seeing in Puerto Rico. It's a market with excess deposits. It's a market that does not have irrational players, it's a market that really is also playing in an economy that is growing. It's an economy that is being turned around as the monies come in to rebuild and reconstruct. As I said a couple of years ago, in my 20 years almost as CEO of OFG, these last couple of years have been building the momentum. Today I'm sitting here, and I see the island being rebuilt, and that is extremely a positive. For us is a way to get closer to our customers and support them to help the economic development of the island also. That's kind of how I view this. Great. Thank you. That's great color. Then maybe just taking that and expanding on that just a little bit. As you're looking at the deposit base for the remainder of the year, have the activities on the mainland kind of stemmed the outflows that we have seen in the back end of 2022, where you might have some migration within, you know, DDA to higher costing or higher yielding products from a depositor basis, but not as much leaving the institution? Is there still an element of deposits that are at risk for either going to a larger institution, heading into Treasuries or otherwise leaving the banking system? The trends are the trends, right? Remember that in the fourth quarter of 2022 as well as in the fourth quarter of 2021, we were managing below the $10 billion mark. That is really what kind of drove, particularly in 2021, but also in 2022 to some degree. What has happened in the first quarter is that you're seeing that kind of stabilizing and to some degree, we have higher deposit balances. Certainly the remix is taking place, and that is the normal thing to happen. We're seeing some savings deposits moving towards a one, two -year CD. We're also seeing, as I said on my remarks, and I think Maritza mentioned it too, we're also seeing Wealth Management benefiting from also some of the flows going to our business in Wealth Management. Our expectation throughout the year is, as Maritza pointed out, 25% beta cumulative. That's how we're modeling the year. The reason for that is we're seeing the remix playing out. Again, based on what I just said earlier, our expectation is to deposits to remain stable and it just gonna depend on how we do business development. I really don't see the same dynamics that are occurring in the U.S. banking market. Okay, great. Just last for me, looking within your commercial buckets, can you fill us in on kind of broader commercial real estate exposure, what you have in terms of, if any, commercial real estate office exposure on the mainland, and then more broadly, kind of how you're thinking about commercial real estate in Puerto Rico versus commercial real estate on the mainland? Yeah. Yeah. We don't have anything on commercial real estate in the mainland, really. What we have here in Puerto Rico. We do have in Puerto Rico an office building, is around 3% of the commercial portfolio, office building, CRE. Overall, I'm sorry, 8%. I made a mistake. It's 8% of the commercial portfolio is office building. Yeah. That's kind of how the exposure that we have. Okay. Is, you know, clearly the risk around the office space is being widely publicized on the mainland. Can you just maybe talk about the dynamics in office more broadly in Puerto Rico? Mm-hmm. Mm-hmm. And what does the risk or perceived risk is to those loans? Timur, let me correct myself on the numbers. Maritza just pointed them out to me. Our office building is 8% of our CRE portfolio, and it is... We have a CRE portfolio of around 36%. Again, the CRE portfolio has an ample gamut of different real estate loans. That's kind of just making sure I got the numbers right for you. In terms of giving you color in terms of office building here in Puerto Rico. Puerto Rico is an island, there are concentrations of office buildings, particularly or primarily in the metropolitan area. That's where you see it. You know, we're seeing the same global trends of hybrid office work and all that stuff. My take from this is that we are not seeing the same acute issues and challenges that the office building market is having in the large cities in the United States. We really don't have those type of issues right now. From our perspective, even in spite of the trends towards hybrid work and the post-pandemic kind of dynamics, we're seeing quite a bit of office occupancy, high levels of office occupancy, and we're not seeing any significant deterioration there. Got it. Thank you for the color. Much appreciated. Yep, you're welcome. Next, we go to the line of Brett Rabatin with Hovde Group. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, everyone. Appreciate the questions. Good morning. Wanted to first start, José, with auto. You know, on the mainland you've seen things like Capital One, you know, pull back from their floor plan lending platform. In Puerto Rico it's obviously a different environment. You know, there's not a great public transportation system, and so people need their cars. I was a little bit surprised to see the improvement linked quarter in credit across the board in auto specifically. I get, you know, you talked earlier about the economy. I get that the EAI index is up a little bit in March to 126. I think March sales of auto were 10.7 thousand for the island. Was just hoping to maybe get some color around credit improvement in auto specifically, if you would ascribe that to anything in particular? Yep. You know, I think you pointed out the differences and what we're seeing in the way we manage our auto business. Is high FICO scores. We are, you know, making the adjustments to interest rates also. We're originating loans right now around 9% handle with FICO score average of around 720. We are, you know, what we're seeing in terms of the credit and the delinquency rates on auto is another confirmation of the liquidity of our consumers and how the excess liquidity that they have, they're deploying it into buying autos and remodeling their homes and there's optimism. I think it's kind of a multiple factors. We have always been very conservative on the underwriting side of the auto business, but we also recognize that the economy is also very supportive today. Okay. wanted to ask, you know, in my mind, PREPA's the remaining big piece to kind of getting, things continued headed in the right direction. I've seen the wrangling around the debt. Any, as you see it from your vantage point, any update on PREPA and just, you know, the cost of electricity, you know, if you think that could be resolved, you know, here in the near term, or do you think that might be a longer term situation? PREPA is a long, long-term situation. The things that are being executed on it now, like privatization of the distribution, transmission, and now recently the generation also is being privatized. There's a lot of noise, but it's the noise that is required to get things done, right? It's gonna take a while. In the meantime, I think there's quite a bit of momentum for solar panels on the private sector. I think the federal government is also supporting that. I think let's not lose sight of Puerto Rico being a beneficiary of the focus that Washington is putting on us from an economic perspective. I think that is another reason why we are sitting where we are today. PREPA is going to take longer, but I think there are going to be private forces. There's going to be public forces. I mean, the Secretary of Energy from the U.S. has visited three or four times already. PREPA and electricity for Puerto Rico is a high focus for the executive branch in Washington. I think, together with the local government and the private sector, we as banks supporting also the financing of solar panels for businesses as well as for residents, I think it's going to accelerate this kind of shift towards lower, more diversified, more resilient electricity production in Puerto Rico. I think that's as much as I can share in terms of electricity and PREPA in itself. Don't get discouraged by hearing too much noise on PREPA. The rails are in place to kind of bring it down in terms of cost and improving its quality and the resiliency. Okay, appreciate that. Then maybe just lastly, wanted to make sure I understood you're still talking about guidance of mid-50%s efficiency ratio. So if I'm just thinking about the implications of that, it would seem like your margin maybe is, has peaked out here. You know, but in terms of the net operating income, it would seem like your expenses would maybe climb, you know, $0.5 million, $2 million quarterly from here, you know, and fee income doesn't change too much. Is that a fair way to think about the implicit guidance from the mid-50%s efficiency ratio? I think you're looking at the right way. remember, we have some variability throughout quarter-over-quarter in terms of the non-interest expenses, just simply because we are deploying technology and as the de-deployment comes out, we need to capitalize those investments. You're looking at it the right way, Brett. I don't know if Maritza wants to add anything. That's correct. That's why we're providing a guidance of $90 million-$92 million quarterly expense range. Maritza. Okay. Do you wanna add anything on the margin, I mean? Well, yeah. I mean, probably, you know, as I mentioned in my prepared remarks, we continue to have the same expectation for the full year that we will be in the same level as the last quarter. That was around 5.69%. We will be between that range for the full year. That's our expectation. Part of it has to do with I think you guys are pointing it out in your, in your write-offs, our higher yielding assets. That's kind of what's what's driving it, and it helps us mitigate some of the shifting on the deposit side that I mentioned earlier. Okay. Great. Thanks for all the color. Yep. Thank you for your questions. Have a good day. Next, we go to the line of Alex Twerdahl with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. Good morning, Alex. I first wanted to go back to the commentary on the 25% through the cycle deposit beta. I was just curious if you can just really break that down for us in terms of is that total deposits, interest-bearing deposits only? When you think about the beta, you know, how does potential rate cuts later this year play into that? Because it just seems to me that the... We actually called around this morning and tried to get the highest rate we could get at any of the Puerto Rican banks, and I'm having a hard time getting to that 25% beta based on what we're hearing in the market today. Yeah. Alex, you know, when and I think we have explained, you know, how we're seeing things this quarter, how we have been shifting through from DDA and savings to high-yielding time deposits. We're expecting to continue to see that type of migration through the rest of the year. So far, the cumulative beta has been 10%. We continue to see that customer will continue looking for high yields, we continue to see the time deposit book of ours growing. That's the reasoning that we're in our base case scenario, we are targeting or estimating a 25% beta for the end of the year. I think Alex also when we look at the beta and you break it into retail versus commercial, the beta on the commercial is higher. We're also gonna see, some commercial clients asking for higher rates. That's also part of what our base case scenario of 25% beta means. If you kind of think about it, our beta for retail is to be significantly lower than that 25%. We're gonna see the commercial beta trending higher the rest of the year, just simply as Maritza mentioned, clients being more efficient in their cash management. Okay. You know, as we think about that playing out over the rest of the year, I mean, do you think the increases will be roughly straight lined, or have you seen more increase or more pressure to increase deposit rates in the first quarter and you think that'll slow? You know, how are you kind of thinking about it playing out over the next couple quarters in terms of deposit cost pressures? I really don't feel that we are operating in a kind of pressured environment. I think you need to think about this, and I don't have an answer for you in terms of when, because who knows, right? I think we need to think about this on also how do we continue to build and retain good profitable customer relations too on the commercial side. That's how we're thinking about this. We're, you know, there's a competitive market here too. It's not irrational, but it's competitive. That's how we look at this. It's very hard to pinpoint how or when interest rates are going to be, kind of how are customers going to be asking us for higher rates or not. In general, what we're doing here. You know, it looks to us that throughout the year there is going to be that continuing shift. I wouldn't call it pressure. I would call it more of a normal trending of rational clients doing the right thing in terms of their cash management. Mostly in this type of cycle, no? Correct. We still have maturities on time deposits that have lower- Rates ... lower rates. That will happen through the year, just the maturity of time deposit and replacing with higher rates. You also mentioned lower interest rates. If the Fed turns around and starts lowering interest rates, well, that's not the base case scenario that we are modeling ourselves on. We are modeling ourselves on that the lower, you know, the Fed moves rates lower next year, not this year. What we're seeing is Fed moving up rates a bit more from these levels and then holding on until later in the first part of 2024. Again, you know, I don't have a crystal ball and we're just modeling. Just to add there, you know, so far and the beta on the asset side has been much higher than the deposit side. We still have room through the year to continue having that type of dynamics through the beta in the asset side versus the beta on the deposit side. Okay. Yeah. I mean, that was the next question I had is just in terms of, one, loan yields, if there's anything in there that's, you know, quote unquote, "non-core" that's pushed that higher in the first quarter that we should be aware of. Secondly, sort of how much more lift there could be, assuming rates basically stay here, maybe we get one more hike, you know, in the next couple of months. Then, you know... So- Yeah, why don't you start with that? Yeah. If you think about the expansion of this quarter, the 19 basis point NIM expansion, about 7 basis point came from cash and investment and the other 24th came from loans. There's nothing extraordinary there. We still have that benefit, the next quarter that we will have the full effect of the 50 basis points that the Fed increased during this first quarter, so we will have that full effect. Also just wanted to mention that we still have some maturities coming from the Treasury group. We have $40 million in maturity in May, then in August, $200 million in August. We will replenish that with a high yielding asset in the base. You know, we can invest in what we want, but I think the if we assume cash will be yielding more than the current carrying yield of that asset. There is a room for us to continue having a very good positive bet on the asset side. Great. I guess as you boil that down, I mean, you know, I think one of the earlier questions alluded to the NIM potentially peaking in the first quarter. I'm just curious how you're seeing the trajectory of the NIM over the next couple quarters. As Maritza mentioned, we're seeing it equal to what we saw in the fourth quarter. The NIM should end for the year around the 5.65%, 5.67%, 5.68%. That's kind of how we're modeling the NIM for the full year. Definitely there is a little bit of a trending down throughout the year as we have, as we kind of talked about last on the fourth quarter call and we're repeating it here, Alex. It hasn't changed. Okay. That's helpful. I just wanted to ask one other question on buybacks. You know, you guys certainly have managed the balance sheet very, very well to have excess liquidity, excess capital levels, or at least what I would consider excess capital levels. I'm just curious, you know, with the share price pulling back, you know, with every other bank out there, you know, how you guys are thinking about buyback activity or possible for buyback activity over the next couple quarters. Yeah. Thank you for your question, Alex. We've been patient on the investment portfolio. We've also been patient on the capital management. We've always felt in the last couple of years that there was no rush for us to go into the investment investing securities and at lower rates. The same thing we felt about capital management. We did the buybacks. We kind of put a pause to it last year. Now it's actually the patience is becoming, I think it's the way we see ourselves is patient. We're patiently opportunistic. I think now there is an opportunity for us to look at investment portfolio, and now it's yielding five handle with tax benefits. That's another kind of, another point that we put in the bag of alternatives. The same thing with capital. When we look at capital, we've looked at the dividend. We've increased the dividend very consistently throughout the last several years. We've also been opportunistic on the buyback, and we will continue to be opportunistic on the buyback too. We still have around $60 million or, and change in the authorization. Thanks for taking my questions. You're welcome, Alex. Have a great day. Next we go to the line of Kelly Motta with KBW. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for the question. Great quarter. Thank you. I will circle back to the funding. Just from a high level perspective, with unique to Puerto Rico, you guys have a lot of relief money still flowing in, and that's accelerated at least in the last, like, year or two. Do you guys have a sense of how much of that incremental relief funding ends up, you know, sticking in Puerto Rico and kind of staying in the deposit accounts, whether it be in consumer accounts or business accounts, and wondering if that can help stem the outflows that we're seeing on the mainland? Yeah. Kelly, it's a good question, hard to answer because, you know, money is fungible, and there are some U.S. businesses here, retail businesses that really are, have operations in the island, but their banking is outside of Puerto Rico, and those are kind of the nationwide kind of franchises. That's a lot of the, a lot of the consumer kind of activity. All in all, what we're seeing is higher balances on the retail individuals, and we're also seeing higher balances on the commercial. It's all because of the liquidity that is running through the system. It has stayed. It hasn't stayed at the same level as it was a year ago, certainly it has stayed at a higher level than before all the stimulus and all the reconstruction activity started to flow in. I wish I could give you a specific answer to that question, I really don't have the data for that. Thanks. I appreciate entertaining it. I don't think we've talked much about the $200 million of two-year FHLB funding you guys brought on. Just wondering kind of the thought process behind that, if that was kind of a defensive measure in the midst of, you know, mid-March, and any kind of color too around what the rate is on that would be helpful for our modeling purposes. Yeah. Yeah, yeah. You know, I think Timur asked the question at the beginning of the call regarding, you know, mid-March, how did you guys look at deposits and all that stuff. Now how did we looked at the world, we read the news, we see what's going on. We were, you know, being prudent and saying, "We have ample liquidity here. We have availability at the Federal Home Loan Bank, all kinds of liquidity. We have, like, in different other places." We said, "Let's just be prudent. Let's just take a three-year, $200 million advance from the Federal Home Loan Bank." By the way, the yield is around, or the cost is around $4.50, $4.55 or something. really just be defensive in case that anything trickles into Puerto Rico. The good news is that it didn't, and it hasn't. I think we're in a good position overall in terms of our balance sheet, and that's how we're seeing it. Got it. Maybe last question for me is on credit. Your early stage and total delinquencies are down, NPAs down as well. As you look ahead, you know, charge-off rates are running a lot lower than they were pre-COVID. Do you have a sense of a cadence of normalization from here on out? Do you think, you know, where you've been the past couple quarters is a good estimation near term on a go-forward basis, or is there anything you're seeing that may indicate there could be a tick up in credit losses? Yeah. We are not seeing any reversal. We are not necessarily seeing a trend, a continuation of the trend downwards in terms of the delinquency rates and all accelerating because, you know, it's hard for us to envision that. Certainly what we're seeing from the consumer side on the credit is very encouraging. We've been kind of waiting for the last year or so when is it gonna kind of revert closer to the levels before the pandemic, and it hasn't. I think it's time for us to say there's a paradigm shift here, and there is a lower level. Puerto Rico's economy has also done that shift in terms of unemployment, in terms of business activity, manufacturing and all. It's logical that credit trends will continue to trend, positive in the foreseeable future. All right. I'll step back. Thank you so much for the questions. You're welcome. Thank you for your questions, too. Once again, if you'd like to ask a question, please press star and one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause again briefly. At this time, there are no further questions. I'll now turn the call back over to management for any closing remarks. Thank you, operator. Thanks again to all our team members and to all our stakeholders who listened in today. Have a wonderful day and enjoy the upcoming weekend. Thank you. This does conclude today's teleconference.