Day, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Omada Health Fourth Quarter 2025 Earnings Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speakers presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. You will then hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. Please be advised that today's conference is being recorded. I would now like to hand the conference over to your speaker today, Allan Kells, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you. Good afternoon. Welcome to Omada Health's Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2025 Earnings Call. Joining me today are Sean Duffy, our Co-founder and CEO, Wei-Li Shao, President, and Steve Cook, CFO. Before we begin, I'd like to note that we'll be discussing non-GAAP financial measures that we consider helpful in evaluating Omada's performance. You can find details on how these relate to our GAAP measures, along with the reconciliations in the press release available on our website. We'll also be making forward-looking statements based on our current expectations and assumptions, which are subject to risks and uncertainties, including factors listed in our press release and in the risk factors found in our filings with the SEC. Actual results could differ materially. We assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements. With that, I'll turn the call over to Sean. Good afternoon, everyone, and thank you, Allan. 2025 was a milestone year for Omada. We became a public company, delivered 53% revenue growth for the year, and achieved GAAP profitability for the first time in Q4. We also significantly outperformed initial expectations from the time of our IPO, and we believe we are entering 2026 with momentum, with ambition, and with a clear plan for what's next. Here are the highlights from Q4 and the full year. Total members reached 886,000 at year-end, up 55% compared to 2024. Revenue grew 58% in Q4 and 53% for the full year to $260 million. Gross margins expanded to record levels. We achieved our first quarter of positive GAAP net income in Q4 at $5 million, and we delivered positive full-year adjusted EBITDA of $6 million. We believe these results reflect the impact of strong market tailwinds combined with a decade of investments. Omada's technology and operational platform, our clinical programs, our peer-reviewed research, productive distribution channels, and more than a decade of rich and unique data are strongly suited for this exact moment. When customer demand for chronic care solutions, a rapidly evolving GLP-1 marketplace, and AI-driven innovation converge. We believe that 2025 demonstrated how we can capture that momentum. The real story is at the level of the person we're supporting. As a GLP-1 Care Track member recently told us, "The Omada program, in collaboration with my doctor and the use of GLP-1 meds, has been life-changing. I learned real skills needed to lose weight and be healthy for a lifetime. The beauty of the Omada plan was that I did not just jump in with all of these changes on day one. The plan guided me to focus on different lessons each week and then select a goal for the coming week. When I was stuck, my coaches were there to make suggestions and help guide me along the way. Knowing that someone cared and took the time to check my meal log and comment about a recipe or a new meal idea I put together that looks good helped me feel that I was not doing it alone." Stories like that get to the heart of what we do. Omada is on a mission to bend the curve of obesity-related disease. 40% of adults have obesity, and nearly 2/3 have at least one cardiometabolic risk factor, such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, or cardiovascular disease. We believe the healthcare system is structurally unable to address this at scale without a fundamentally different care model. A person's disease trajectory is determined largely outside the doctor's office through nutrition, movement, sleep, medications, and care plan adherence. Yet the broader healthcare system still organizes around infrequent 15-minute visits. Omada puts the space between those visits at the center of care through an integrated multi-condition care model refined over more than a decade. We've built a member experience that brings together care teams, AI, connected devices, and a custom care platform designed for quality at scale. We've expanded into a multi-condition platform spanning weight health, diabetes, hypertension, musculoskeletal care, GLP-1 companion care, GLP-1 prescribing, and our newly launched cholesterol program, giving employers the convenience of a single partner for multiple highly prevalent conditions. We've accumulated a large and growing body of peer-reviewed evidence and accreditations, which we believe is a key reason employers and health plans choose Omada. We helped the market understand that Omada delivers true clinical quality healthcare, which enables us to contract and bill as a healthcare provider, allowing our fees to be treated as medical spend. We've established thousands of customer relationships across a broad web of distribution channels, spanning an estimated more than 25 million covered lives. In operating for over a decade, we've amassed a robust and unique data set, tens of millions of care team messages, and billions of data points that underpin our product, strengthen our AI capabilities and allow us to innovate more quickly on the back of significant scale. These investments form the foundation of everything ahead. They allow us to look through the windshield with optimism, ambition and excitement. 2025 served as a significant launchpad for our next chapter, and I wanna touch on three areas where we're particularly proud. First, we believe 2025 was the year we solidified our position as a leader in enterprise GLP-1 companion care, while reinforcing that our opportunity expands well beyond GLP-1s. Employer demand to maximize the value of their GLP-1 investment and reduce waste drove significant adoption of our GLP-1 Care Track. As we've scaled to over 150,000 members on GLP-1s, we've seen what we believe these members need most. Support to stay on therapy, manage side effects, build sustainable habits, and maintain results if and when they discontinue. Our results have shown that GLP-1 Care Track members on average, achieved greater weight loss compared with published real-world evidence, and critically largely maintained their weight on average one year after discontinuing GLP-1 therapy. These outcomes challenge the narrative of inevitable weight rebound and underscore the power of behavior change layered on top of medication. In November, we announced our GLP-1 prescribing capability. As the landscape grows more complex with oral and injectable options, varying doses and emerging maintenance therapies, employers are asking us to help them navigate it all. Adding prescribing strengthens our position by helping ensure that the right member is on the right medication at the right time, while also delivering lifestyle support designed to improve outcomes and minimize waste. At the same time, the broader spotlight on GLP-1s has increased attention on cardiometabolic disease overall. Because Omada supports weight health with or without GLP-1s and helps members manage diabetes, hypertension, and now cholesterol, we've also seen strong growth among members not on GLP-1s. For customers that choose not to cover GLP-1s, our weight health programs support their employees and new options like our GLP-1 Flex Care create flexible paths for employers to offer meaningful support even when they are not in a position to afford the medicines. Second, we made meaningful progress with AI in 2025, and I am particularly excited about our potential for AI innovation going forward. We've embedded AI throughout Omada. For members, we launched Omada Spark, our AI-powered assistant that works alongside human coaches for real-time nutritional support, motivational challenges, and habit building. We launched that in Q2 of last year and followed with enhancements in Q4 with Meal Map, an AI-driven experience focused on food quality, not just calories. For our care teams, AI-enabled tools like contact summarization let coaches spend less time on administration and more time on personalization. 100% of our engineers are equipped with AI-assisted coding tools to improve development, speed, and output. What makes AI at Omada different from a typical software business is what sits underneath. In caring for members, we've received tens of millions of care team messages, billions of data points, and more than a decade of specific clinical outcomes, comprising what we believe is one of the most exciting cardiometabolic data sets in digital health. That data can improve our AI tools and overall member experience, such that interactions with today's members make the experience better for tomorrow's. The last area I'm proud of in 2025 is our commercial success. As Wei- Li will share, in 2025, we closed significant additional covered lives, which we believe positions us well going forward. Our between-visit care model and multi-condition platform continue to resonate as we closed contracts in the second half of 2025. Employers and health plans increasingly see the advantage of working with a single scaled evidence-based partner, our year-end results reflect buyers leaning into that vision. In 2026, we plan to maintain our focus on the pillars that power Omada's growth, expanding covered lives through new customers and channel partnerships, increasing enrollment effectiveness so that more eligible people become active members, and driving deeper engagement and retention through AI in a continually improving member experience. Across these pillars, we're expanding capabilities. GLP-1 prescribing cholesterol and GLP-1 Flex Care, greater personalization and content through AI, the use of AI to drive efficiency across engineering, operations, and care delivery. These investments are intentionally designed to balance growth and profitability as we continue to move toward our long-term ambition of 20%+ adjusted EBITDA margins. We accomplished a great deal in 2025 for Omada's mission, we are entering 2026 with bold ambitions to bend the curve of disease. That's what we're here for, that's why we do what we do. With that, I'll hand things over to Wei- Li. Thanks, Sean, hello, everyone. I'm proud of our teams and what they accomplished in 2025. It's an exciting time to be at Omada Health, I'm pleased to walk through our results and progress. As Sean shared, we ended the year with 886,000 members, up 55% year-over-year. This includes 55,000 net new member additions in Q4, nearly double the net adds in Q4 of 2024. For the year, we added 314,000 net new members compared to 182,000 in 2024. Growth continues to be driven by both multi-condition adoption and demand for our GLP-1 support capabilities, which together position Omada Health as a broad integrated partner for cardiometabolic care. We also benefited from improvements in marketing effectiveness, which drove higher enrollment rates across both new and existing customers. Key performance drivers in 2025 included estimated covered lives grew by more than 5 million, and we ended the year with over 25 million estimated eligible lives, with strong performance across multiple channels, including the successful launch of a large new channel partner. Our email enrollment rate increased significantly with the average percentage of a customer's population that receives our outreach and then enrolls increasing by 24% year-over-year. Member engagement remains strong as well. As of December 2025, more than 55% of our members in their 12th month of cardiometabolic programs still engage with the platform at least once during the month. More than 50% of members in their 24th month engage at least once during the month. Our focus on outcomes also remain consistent across our programs. Taken together, we strengthen funnel conversion at multiple layers, which gives us confidence heading into 2026. We ended the year having supported over 150,000 members on GLP-1s, adding more than 100,000 in 2025 alone. As Sean mentioned, we continue to see growth beyond GLP-1s across our cardiometabolic suite. Substantial white space remains. Our penetration across combined self-insured and fully insured lives is below 10% of what a total addressable market that we estimate at over $138 billion. We have also been pleased to see developments in government-funded healthcare, such as the passage of the Prevent Diabetes Act, which cemented Medicare coverage for virtual diabetes prevention programs. While it's early and details are still developing, we are closely watching emerging programs like BALANCE and Access Models from CMS. This government activity reinforces that virtual first prevention is increasingly recognized as essential to expanding access to quality care. Our strategy is organized around three pillars: innovation, programs that work, and our multi-condition platform. The results we delivered in 2025 are a direct reflection of progress across each. Beyond the AI capabilities Sean described, our innovation agenda in 2025 extended across several additional fronts. With respect to GLP-1 prescribing, since sharing our plans, we've had many discussions with interested customers and channel partners who are looking for help managing GLP-1 complexity. As GLP-1s evolve across oral and injectable forms, different doses and new mechanisms, employers need to manage switching, titration, and benefit design in ways that improve ROI, not just increase spend. Prescribing is a natural extension of our model, allowing Omada to act as a GLP-1 value maximizer across the entire journey, from informing prescription decisions to supporting members on therapy, to safely discontinuing medication when appropriate. We look forward to providing updates as we build out this capability. In addition to prescribing, we also have plans to support more flexible GLP-1 access models, including the GLP-1 Flex Care option we announced today. The need for alternative GLP-1 benefit design solutions is underappreciated. We believe this could represent a significant opportunity. The GLP-1 market for large commercially insured employers is currently split, roughly 45% covering GLP-1s for obesity and roughly 55% that don't. Within the segment that covers, two of the country's largest PBMs have built GLP-1 solutions that include or offer Omada programs. One offers employers financial reassurance through a spend guarantee. Omada has been a successful partner in that solution. The other expanded its GLP-1 offerings last year. Omada programs are an option there as well. The 55% that aren't covering GLP-1s need something different before moving from waiting and watching to confidently covering. That's where GLP-1 Flex Care comes in. It gives employers a structured way to connect eligible employees with clinical evaluation, prescribing, and ongoing medical oversight for GLP-1s alongside Omada's lifestyle and behavioral support. Employers pay for the doctor's visits, labs and behavioral support. Employees purchase branded GLP-1s out-of-pocket through credible cash pay channels. We believe the future for GLP-1 coverage will include multiple benefit design solutions addressing diverse employer needs, including robust clinical services, broad GLP-1 access, lifestyle support, and financial reassurance. Our strategy is to be part of that spectrum so employers can access the clinical benefits of our programs regardless of the benefit design they choose. We've also recently expanded our cardiometabolic offerings by adding a cholesterol program. This is a risk area that is often underserved in traditional cardiometabolic offerings, despite the fact that up to 70% of adults with obesity have high cholesterol. Evidence from our existing programs has shown that virtual behavior first interventions can drive an average 39 point reduction in total cholesterol in four months among participants with diabetes and high cholesterol. Omada for Cholesterol will build on that foundation, connecting behavior change, lab awareness, and ongoing guidance from clinical specialists so cholesterol risk becomes visible and actionable within everyday life. We recently completed an initial commercial launch with a large enterprise customer that has more than 300,000 employees. We expect a broader rollout in 2027. In summary, our innovation allows us to broaden how we support the management of cardiometabolic risk, leverage AI as a differentiator, and deepen our relevance across a wide range of benefit strategies, making Omada a more flexible long-term partner for employers and health plans. Our second pillar is programs that work, solutions grounded in evidence and behavior change science that deliver measurable, durable outcomes. In 2025, we expanded our body of research on GLP-1 support. One analysis showed that members in our GLP-1 Care Track who discontinued medication largely maintained their weight one year later with an average weight change of only 0.8% compared to 11%-12% average weight regain reported in key clinical trials without ongoing lifestyle support. A separate analysis found that members in our enhanced GLP-1 Care Track who remained in the program and persisted on the medication for 12 months achieved average weight loss of 18% compared to 12% in real world evidence without structured support. We also published our 30th peer-reviewed manuscript focused on our joint and muscle health program, which showed that patients using Omada's virtual physical therapy had lower total healthcare utilization and reduced MSK related costs and encounters on average at six and 12 months compared to in-person PT, even after accounting for program costs. These results demonstrate that our human-led digitally enabled model can drive outcomes that matter to members and customers. Our third pillar is the power of our multi-condition platform relative to point solutions. Customers increasingly recognize the advantage of working with a single scaled partner across multiple conditions. Our ability to support obesity and weight health, diabetes, hypertension, cholesterol, and MSK conditions and GLP-1 care as one provider continues to be a key differentiator, and the growth across our cardiometabolic suite reflects this. Revenue from our weight health program, which increasingly includes members on GLP-1s for weight loss, grew more than 50%, and revenue from both our diabetes and hypertension programs grew at rates of 45% or more year-over-year. That broad-based growth across conditions reflects employers and health plans leaning into Omada as their integrated cardiometabolic partner, not just a single condition solution. In summary, our progress across innovation, programs that work, and our multi-condition platform help to drive our strong 2025 results and provide tangible proof that customers are buying into this vision. We believe we're well-positioned for 2026 and beyond. With that, I'll turn it over to Steve. Thank you, Wei-Li. Hello, everyone. I'll walk through our Q4 and full year 2025 results, discuss the key drivers, and provide our outlook for 2026. Let me start with top line results. Members grew 55% year over year to 886,000. Revenue in Q4 was $76 million, up 58% year- over- year. For the full year, revenue was $260 million, up 53% compared to 2024. The primary factors driving growth include a broad industry focus on cardiometabolic conditions, deeper penetration of multi-condition customers, strong adoption of our GLP-1 programs, and more effective enrollment campaigns. As these strong results and macro trends feed into our business model, they are creating a durable, visible revenue stream with meaningful operating leverage, which I'll discuss in a moment. I'd also like to note that in Q4 we had a one-time transaction that resulted in approximately $2 million of additional revenue, gross profit, and adjusted EBITDA. While relatively small and immaterial to full year results, I wanted to note it for any impact on sequential modeling from Q4 to Q1. Turning to gross profit, we saw significant margin expansion in both Q4 and the full year. Q4 GAAP gross profit was $54 million, up 67% year-over-year, with GAAP gross margin of 71% versus 67% in the prior year. For the full year, GAAP gross profit was $171 million, up 66%, and GAAP gross margin was 66% versus 61% in 2024. Q4 adjusted gross profit was $55 million, up 65% compared to Q4 2024, and adjusted gross margin reached 73% in Q4, an all-time high and a 320 basis point improvement year-over-year, demonstrating our ability to operate above our long-term 70%+ adjusted gross margin target for the first time. For the full year, adjusted gross profit increased 64% to $176 million, outpacing our 53% revenue growth by 11 points and driving adjusted gross margin up 450 basis points over 2024 to 68% in 2025. Over the past 4 years, we've nearly quadrupled revenue and expanded adjusted gross margins by more than 1,600 basis points, a trajectory that underscores the leverage in our business. This has been driven by our growing member base and multi-condition expansion, which spreads fixed costs across a larger revenue base as well as care team efficiencies enabled by our platform, AI-powered tools, and optimized staffing models. We believe these drivers can continue contributing margin expansion as we pursue our long-term target of 70%+ full year adjusted gross margins. Moving to operating expenses, we continue to demonstrate strong leverage below the gross profit line. Q4 GAAP operating expenses increased 28% year-over-year to $50 million. For the full year, GAAP operating expenses were up 25% to $183 million. Adjusted operating expenses grew 27% to $47 million in Q4 and 24% for the full year to $170 million. That 24% annual growth supported 53% revenue growth, with strong operating leverage across all three operating expense lines. Key drivers included scale from our channel partnerships and B2B2C go-to-market approach, sales force leverage from selling multiple conditions with one sales force, R&D efficiency from our flexible program architecture, and spending discipline as we work towards sustained profitability. Our steadfast commitment and multi-year focus on achieving profitability paid off in 2025 as we reach positive adjusted EBITDA a full year ahead of expectations. A milestone driven by financial discipline, strong growth, and the operating leverage I've just described. We're proud of this accomplishment. Notably, Q4 also marked our first quarter of GAAP net income profitability. Specifically, we delivered GAAP net income of $5 million in Q4, which was a $13 million improvement compared to a net loss of $8 million in Q4 of 2024. For the full year, GAAP net loss was $13 million, an improvement of $34 million compared to a loss of $47 million in 2024. Adjusted EBITDA in Q4 was $8 million with an 11% margin, an improvement of $12 million and 18 margin points compared to a loss of $4 million and a negative 7% margin in Q4 2024. Full year adjusted EBITDA was $6 million with a 2% margin, an improvement of $35 million and 19 margin points compared to a loss of $29 million and a negative 17% margin in 2024. Notably, we converted 40% of incremental revenue to the adjusted EBITDA line in 2025, which continues to highlight the scalability of our business. To wrap the discussion of our P&L, I'd like to provide some additional perspective. After we went public in June, initial consensus estimates were approximately $222 million of revenue and a $19 million adjusted EBITDA loss for 2025. We delivered $260 million of revenue and $6 million of adjusted EBITDA, with the positive adjusted EBITDA occurring a year ahead of projections. We're pleased with that performance, and we believe it reflects our strong market position, solid execution, and the strength of our business model. Specific to our balance sheet, we ended 2025 with $222 million of cash and cash equivalents, up from $199 million at the end of Q3. We generated positive operating cash flow for the full year, a significant milestone. We have no debt outstanding, having repaid our $30 million credit facility earlier in 2025. This gives us a strong financial position to invest in initiatives aimed at driving incremental growth and ROI while also maintaining flexibility. For our guidance, we expect 2026 revenue in the range of $312 million-$322 million, with the midpoint reflecting 22% growth over 2025. We expect 2026 adjusted EBITDA in the range of $7 million-$15 million, with the midpoint reflecting a $5 million increase compared to last year. Similar to our 2025 performance, our 2026 guidance is significantly above initial post-IPO consensus expectations. With our revenue midpoint approximately $50 million higher and adjusted EBITDA approximately $15 million higher, reflecting continued strong execution. Let me provide context on how we've approached guidance and on our growth trajectory. Our guided revenue of 22% at the midpoint comes on top of a 53% growth year that included a strong first wave of GLP-1 adoption and significant commercial momentum. This is an exceptional baseline to build from. We built our guidance starting with our year-end base of 886,000 members and over 25 million estimated covered lives. We layer in historical enrollment conversion rates and observed engagement and retention trends with no significant improvement assumed. This allows us to anchor to what we consider our more highly visible level of revenue. Just as important is what's not in the guide. We have not embedded meaningful contributions from GLP-1 prescribing, GLP-1 Flex Care, or our cholesterol program, and we have not assumed further improvement in enrollment conversion rates or significant revenue from contracts not yet signed. Our adjusted EBITDA guidance reflects the revenue outlook combined with the investments we've discussed. If we achieve revenue upside, we would expect a portion to contribute to a stronger adjusted EBITDA. We believe this approach reflects appropriate prudence for initial guidance and positions us to build on our track record of execution. Stepping back from the specifics of our guidance, we believe the most important story is the quality of our growth in 2025. As I shared, we converted 40% of incremental revenue to EBITDA. We achieved our first quarter of GAAP profitability, and we generated positive cash flow for the year. We continue to believe in the long-term scalability and profitability of our business. In closing, we are very pleased with our 2025 results, which reflected outperformance across all key metrics. Looking ahead, we believe our market position, strategic investments, and scalable business model position us well for durable, profitable growth. With that, we'll open the call for questions. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one one again. In the interest of time, we ask that you please limit yourself to one question and one follow-up. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Our first question comes from David Roman with Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone. Steve, really appreciate the detail on the guidance basis as you think about 2026. Maybe I could just push you a little bit on the assumptions there, and very specifically, I just wanna make sure that we're hearing the Alika correctly, that effectively the guidance contemplates only contribution from the existing business and not necessarily some of the new opportunities. If that is the case, I just wanna make sure that we're not misreading this. It looks like the guidance suggests some of the base business starting to hit a wall or markedly decelerate. Just wanna make sure that we're interpreting that correctly, and that's how you're intending to frame the guidance. Yeah. David, thank you for the question. You know, firstly, we're obviously extremely proud of the results in 2025. You know, per some of the prepared remarks, growing 53% in 2025 was well ahead of expectations. When we look back at our commitments from, you know, just 6+ months ago during the IPO, we're trending meaningfully above that path at $50 million ahead on revenue and $15 million ahead on EBITDA. We're carrying a tremendous amount of momentum, and we're a full year ahead of expectations that we set at that time. It's also worth noting that, you know, from the get-go, we have been communicating externally that we intend to grow this business for the foreseeable future at at least a minimum commitment of 20%+, and we think that the guidance reflects our commitment against those projections. As we think about, you know, some of the inputs there, you're correct in that we're basing it off of 886,000 exit members. We're looking back, we're combing through all of our historical trends on enrollment rate conversion, on engagement rate, and assuming that there's no material improvement across those metrics throughout the course of the year. We have a lot of internal investments and initiatives focused on improving those metrics to the extent we're able to capitalize on those throughout the course of the year. That would be incremental revenue compared to our guide. Per some of your commentary, we spent some time talking about our prescribing capabilities, GLP-1 Flex Care, cholesterol. These are also not materially in our guidance numbers. We're gonna be launching a lot of those in market this year, and as those gain market traction, and we have more of our customers, purchasing those will be reflected in potential upside to the guide. Super helpful. And maybe just a follow-up. As you kind of think about what you've observed in January and February from conversions off of the 2025, or excuse me, 2026 selling season, can you just give us some flavor of maybe a little more detail how that tracked, and then how we should think about just the cadence of revenue and profitability throughout the year to make sure we have the phasing of the year correct? Yeah. Hi, this is Wei-Li. Let me talk a little bit about how we closed the end of the year and to the extent that I can cast a little bit of high level color on what we've seen this year in just the first couple of months. You know, we're pretty pleased with how we closed the end of the selling season. I mean, we're up over $5 million additional eligible covered lives across our business. We've also seen continued momentum in terms of multi-condition product sales. As mentioned earlier, last year, we improved our enrollment rate yield or enrollment rate performance, you know, more than 20%, 24% to be precise. We're pleased with the overall funnel developments, if you wanna put it that way, or funnel conversion improvement. You know, as mentioned by Steve, you know, that's gonna be carried on into how we think about this year's performance. I won't go into too much quantitative characterization of January and February, but suffice it to say that things are tracking, and we like what we see there. As you might expect, as it is every year, the additional covered lives we closed in the prior year oftentimes are going live at the beginning of the year, it's a heavy enrollment season. That certain pattern or that seasonality certainly exists too as well. David, I'll just add a little bit of color on some of the revenue and the EBITDA progression, per your question. You know, we had a extremely strong Q4. We saw 11% sequential growth quarter-over-quarter. That's stronger compared to what we've observed historically. If you looked at 2024, we only saw a 5% increase there. We didn't expect as big of a jump on Q4 revenue, on Q1 revenue, basing off of where we exited the year, and we also did have that one-time $2 million adjustment, which we don't intend to repeat going through the year. Q1 should roughly be, you know, expect to be flat relative to Q4, when accounting for that $2 million, and then we'll sequentially grow revenue throughout the course of the year. As you're aware, Q1 is our largest net new enrollment volume quarter. It carries additional costs associated with increased device shipments as well as increased costs for our care teams as there's more labor in the first quarter. We'll steadily climb out of that as we go throughout the year, improving gross margin and improving EBITDA margin throughout the remainder of the year. Great. Thanks so much. Thank you. Our next question comes from Sean Dodge with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is open. Yeah, thanks. Good afternoon. I just wanna start maybe understanding a little bit better the mechanics of the new GLP-1 Flex Care program. It sounds like the existing GLP-1 Care Track, but now just building some connections for the member to get a script and actually buy the drug. Does building that in, does that change the economics of the program for you at all? Do you get compensated for facilitating those connections, or is this just more about kind of broadening the appeal and kind of the utility of the program to more employers? Yeah. Thank you, Sean. This is Sean here. Happy to talk about Flex Care. Let me just start with a characterization on the segments in the employer market specific to GLP-1s for obesity, because there are two primary groups. The first is those who cover. That's roughly 45% of the market. They cover GLP-1s for obesity. Historically, when we talked about our CareTrack, that's who that was targeted toward. Those are folks who wanna maximize the value of that investment. There's actually a bigger segment, and that's roughly 55% of the large employers and those that just do not cover GLP-1s for obesity yet. Equally, they do want a way to support their employees. That is what the GLP Flex Care solution is targeted toward, because it gives these employers a structured model, where, yes, per your comments, they do pay Omada and will pay Omada more for the GLP-1 Flex Care offering because that includes clinical evaluation, prescribing, lab ordering, and Omada's lifestyle and behavioral support. Well-eligible employees can purchase the branded GLPs out of pocket through vetted cash pay channels, of course, with a focus on accessing the lowest available price. This in turn allows that segment of the market to still offer their employees a chance for high-quality GLP-1 care with strong oversight, without immediately taking on that full drug spend risk. Okay. That's super helpful. Thanks, Sean. Then, Wei-Li, you mentioned having improved enrollment yields 24% last year, so driving significant efficiencies on the marketing front. Is there anything more you can share on just, like, how you've been able to do that? I think you mentioned AI playing a role there. Then just maybe how much runway you see being left when it comes to driving, you know, kinda incremental margin or marketing efficiencies. Yeah, sure, Sean. Let me address that. In terms of how we were able to achieve that, as you and others may recall, we do a lot of digital marketing. As a result of that, we actually have the ability to do dozens, if not hundreds, of A/B tests. Those A/B tests can switch out concepts, creative, language, call to action, you name it, across the spectrum of what one would think about optimizing in our campaign outreach. That certainly is a, is a component of that, and we did that last year. We did that in 2024. We did that in 2023. We're gonna do it again in 2026. We still think that there's runway to optimize those campaigns in that outreach. The other component, of course, is a multi-channel component. When we say multi-channel or omni-channel, we mean about digital signage, a on-site at an employer, especially if they have a large distribution center with a large warehouse, for instance, employees that are on site. Then, other forms, including direct mail, other types of flyers, so on and so forth. Even in those particular channels, we can then optimize again the frequency, how often we send, what is the depth of the content, the copy, the creative. Then we can actually look across entire campaigns, and how we define a campaign is really a combination of all those things in a multi-channel approach to understand how we stack them on each other. There's multiple dimensions upon which we can actually optimize and improve yield rate or employee, enrollment rate. We think again that there's still a runway to improve that, in 2026, and that certainly is on the docket for us to do so. Okay. Thanks for the details and, congratulations on the great year. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Craig Hettenbach with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Great. Thank you. Sean, just going back to AI, plenty of debate on the impact, including potential disruption to business models. Against the backdrop of some of the concerns in the marketplace, where do you see Omada as most insulated, and what are some of the things you're doing to benefit from AI as opposed to be disrupted? Yeah. Hi, Craig. You know, thank you for the question. It is one that I and we think about a lot. Pulling up beyond Omada, I believe we are on the frontier of just a remarkably innovative moment in the history of healthcare. This is a moment where, in our view, it's being propelled by AI. Against that, there are a number of things that I think frankly any innovative company can do. That these include leveraging AI coding assistance, using AI to improve member support, using exciting frontier models within their app. Omada is doing these. We're already seeing signs of how this impacts the business on a day-to-day basis, our members on a day-to-day basis, and that is, of course, an important part of ongoing improvements to margin. That being said, those are perhaps table stakes. Yet there is one thing that we believe that is true today and will be true tomorrow, and that is the value of unique data sets that in many cases take years to build. We have tens of millions of care team conversations, hundreds of millions of biometric data points, and billions of real-world data points. What that allows us to do, and what we're excited, is it allows us to customize and personalize care in a way that's unique In a way that's valuable. It will take time to prove this out, and it'll take time because we are in healthcare. We're regulated, we have devices, hardware, a supply chain, a complex web of distribution relationships, and we're dealing with people's lives, which we take very seriously. When I'm asked that question, I don't tend to view it as if AI will disrupt healthcare or disrupt Omada. Rather, I view it as a question of who is going to build it in the right way in healthcare, and I believe we have the unique foundations to do just that here at Omada. Helpful. Thank you. As a follow-up, I want to focus in on just the hypertension diabetes programs. I feel like they tend to get overshadowed just by all the excitement and interest in GLP-1. Can you talk about the traction you're seeing in those programs and just how you see the runway for growth in the coming years? Yeah. Hi, Craig, this is Wei-Li, and you get extra points for asking a non-GLP-1 question. I appreciate that. Yeah, we've always said that the GLP-1 moment is actually a cardiometabolic moment, insofar as meaning that the discussion is a gateway into the broader cardiometabolic kind of condition question and challenge that our customers face. In fact, when you look at the cardiometabolic landscape, the overwhelming majority of people who suffer from those conditions are not taking a GLP-1. It actually represents a TAM that is as, if not larger than, the current GLP-1 accessible market. What does that mean in terms of our performance? You know, we've always said, from the get-go that a pillar of our strategy is to understand and realize that people who suffer from, let's say, obesity, also have diabetes, also have hypertension, as we all know, and that's why we provide a multi-condition platform. Multi-condition sales continues to be something that is strategically important and a huge strategic focus for us. We've talked about our progress on that. It continues. We continue to make progress on that, and we're happy with that. Maybe a way to talk about the results in our portfolio products is that we saw strong growth not only across our cardiometabolic suite, but across, you know, the individual programs. Prevention, or weight health, obesity grew more than 50%, and both diabetes and hypertension grew 45% or more year-over-year. We think that breadth of growth really reflects the customers increasingly using Omada as their integrated cardiometabolic partner, excuse me, and not just for a single condition. We're seeing growth in summary, in both diabetes and hypertension, almost directionally similar to the overall growth rate that we saw last year overall on revenue. Helpful color. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question comes from Ryan MacDonald with Needham & Company. Your line is open. Thanks for taking my questions. Congrats on a nice quarter. Steve, maybe first for you. Just as we're thinking through the 2026 guidance. Obviously you mentioned sort of no material changes or improvements in sort of enrollment, you know, yields and rates from there. Should we sort of take the guidances, sort of, you know, you grew covered lives 25% a year-over-year basis, if you assume that sort of same conversion rate, that sort of member count grows about that 25% rate, then you see some declines in average revenue per member. If that's the case, can you help us understand what you're seeing from a program mix perspective that may be driving sort of those continued sort of ARPU declines? Thanks. Yeah, absolutely. Ryan. Happy to provide some color there. Again, per some of the prior comments, just to recalibrate on what's in our baseline assumptions, it's just starting with that 886,000 members and then layering on some historical assumptions around enrollment conversion as well as engagement rate. I think the easiest way to think through the modeling next year is that ARPU stays relatively flat. Historically, it's been roughly just shy of $300 per ending member. Then building up your total member base off of that, growing roughly in line with revenue guidance at 22%. What's important is what's not in the guide, and we talked a little bit about this, all which have the ability to drive incremental ARPU throughout the year. The first being some of the new product categories we're entering to the extent we're able to layer on GLP-1, Flex Care, prescribing cholesterol. These are all accretive to ARPU throughout the year. We are creating internally some investments around driving more engagement through increased product and feature enhancement. The longer we can keep folks in program, that also has the ability to drive additional ARPU with little incremental cost as we go throughout the year. The really way to just take it the basis is to grow the member count by 22% and keep revenue roughly flat. Super helpful. I appreciate the finer point on that. Then, maybe as a secondary question for Wei-Li or Sean. You know, earlier this week we were at a benefits conference, and what the conversation really centered around sort of for this year was, so this idea that, you know, your average employee benefits portfolio is about 28 different point solutions today, and that the conversation is really around in the current budgetary environment with healthcare costs continuing to rise at accelerating rates, is more of a consolidation, looking to see where there are duplicate solutions and then optimizing for outcomes. Would love to know if this is something you're seeing sort of in the early stages of the 2026 selling season and how maybe this could potentially favor your multi-condition platform relative to sort of individual point solutions providers. Thanks. Yeah. Ryan, thank you. Thank you for the question. I mean, if you served as a head of benefits and we're on LinkedIn, you'd have about, you know, 50 messages a week coming in from, you know, point solution providers, and that does grow tiring, and that's a message we hear frequently about. It's one that we respond to. It's been a recurring theme that customers love the fact that they can get quality care across multiple care areas from Omada. We see that across our portfolio suite, and even we see that within GLP-1s, where one buyer is one buyer, and equally they recognize that tomorrow's strategy specific to their GLP-1s may not be the same as today's. We are thrilled with that. In fact, I think we have a proof in concept of this approach right in front of us in cholesterol. We announced Omada for Cholesterol. That's a natural extension of our cardiometabolic suite. We like that. High cholesterol, often as shared in remarks, coexist with obesity, diabetes, hypertension. One of the reasons that we got excited to do it is we heard about it from our largest customers who said, "This is a clinical area where I care about. Omada, we trust you. We'd love if we could work together on it." Then we're starting out of the gate either with a customer lined up there for Omada for Cholesterol. If I were just to tag on a little bit to that and add, you know, and what really drove that particular situation, and we're seeing this repeated across a number of opportunities, is exactly what you mentioned around a fatigue around single point solutions. Imagining somebody who suffers from obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and now of course, some dyslipidemia or high cholesterol, they could be on as many of four different applications, and the consolidation into one multi-product company, Omada, that has proven evidence-based results and outcomes in ROI, certainly has attracted the buyers, and we're seeing that play through, which is why we continue to see momentum in multi-product sales and growth across the portfolio of programs. The last bit I would also mention is that we happen to be in the actual therapeutic areas or disease areas that HR benefits companies, CEOs, CFOs understand are actually the biggest drivers of their healthcare spend. Cardiovascular events, cholesterol, heart attacks, diabetes, obesity, MSK. They always register, small company, big company, always to the top of the top five, top six areas that are driving spend. As employers and benefit solution providers decide to consolidate away from the quote-unquote, what you said, 28 different point solution providers, they're obviously going to think about Omada. They're going to think about multi-condition platforms. They're also going to think about those providers that are in the sweet spot that are driving most of their year-over-year healthcare spend, and it happens to be the ones we're in. Appreciate all the color. Thanks. Thank you. Our next question comes from Elizabeth Anderson with Evercore ISI. Your line is open. Hi, guys. Good evening. Thanks so much for the questions. Improving gross margins. Steve, obviously heard what you said about the contribution to gross margins from the $2 million, but still improved quite nicely even without that. Can you talk about that and how you see those flowing through into 2026? I understand that obviously you guys have seasonality that will impact particularly the 1Q numbers, but just sort of how to think of that incrementally. If there's any more color you can provide on sort of what that adjustment was in the fourth quarter, that would also be super helpful. Thank you. Yeah. Maybe I'll start there with the adjustment in the fourth quarter. We did have a $2 million one-time true-up. This was a negotiation that was cascading throughout the year with one of our larger partners. We ought to resolve that in the fourth quarter, and as such, release that revenue. If we had negotiated it and resolved it earlier in their year, you'd have seen that revenue recognized ratably throughout the course of the year. We don't expect that to recur on a go-forward basis. With regard to gross margin, again, tremendously proud of our performance in Q4, hitting 73% gross margin. As we've communicated consistently, our terminal annualized target, it continues to be 70%+. We believe Q4 really demonstrates our ability to march towards that target in the long term. Two main drivers here. The first being ongoing traction with multi-condition customers. The more diabetes and hypertension revenue that we drive through, those are coming through those are our higher, highest priced products, and they drive incremental gross margin dollars and gross profit dollars for us. That was a large contributor. The second piece is just more cost efficiencies, and that came in in two forms. The first is us just continuing to optimize our labor costs across our care teams. We've experimented with dozens of staffing models, and we really feel like we fine-tuned that over the course of the past several years, which led to additional margin expansion, as well as some of the prepared remarks, us continuing just to use AI and using a contact summarization, making our care teams more effective and more efficient. We're gonna be planning to roll some of those, that momentum throughout the course of the next year. We envision 2026 being another key stepping stone on our path to getting to 70%+ gross margin. Super helpful. Thank you. Congrats. Thank you. Our next question comes from Stan Berenshteyn with Wells Fargo. Your line is open. Good evening. Thanks for taking my questions. First on retention dynamics, I mean, you commented that they're pretty steady over 12 and 24 months. I'm curious whether the new products like Omada Spark and Meal Map, whether they've demonstrated any measurable improvement in engagement that you can point to? Yeah. Thanks a lot, Stan. Wei-Li here. Let me take this one around Omada Spark. We launched this in the first half of last year and then fast followed with some enhancements to Omada Spark. We're proud of that and it allows our members to essentially have a nutritional AI assistant. Food is such an important part of the behavior change process. Of course, the Meal Map allows individuals to either dictate their food, snapshot their food with their camera, log their food in a number of different ways, and then the nutritional density of the food is actually registered very accurately, and then that information then translates into what meaningful changes can they make. So I kind of recourse all of that, because you can imagine the value that members have in seeing this, knowing that nutrition and food and food quality and nutritional density is such an important part to generating a positive outcome, not just in obesity and weight health, but across diabetes, hypertension, and now cholesterol, and believe it or not, even in MSK as well. We're encouraged by the early results. Members who interact with Omada Spark, our health AI assistant, along with Meal Map, are demonstrating higher levels of ongoing engagement. In fact, because of that, are returning to the app more frequently compared to those who haven't yet used the tools. So we're seeing that lift. Now, specifically to Meal Map, which is the part and parcel of understanding what you eat and then matching the behavior change, we're also seeing meaningful lifts in actual food tracking behavior, which is one of our strongest predictors of sustained weight management. All of these, of course, drive more activity within the app. Because we bill based upon activity for the majority of our business, we do believe over the long haul and over time, that this should potentially create some meaningful improvement in terms of financial performance. Thank you. I just wanna follow up on the covered lives. I think you mentioned 25 million. That's about 5 million incremental from your prior disclosures. Can you share with us what is the mix of self-insured versus fully insured within those, 5 million that you onboarded? Thank you. Yeah, sure. right. Of the 5 million that we closed, the way to think about it, and characterize that, you know, it was driven by strength across multiple commercial channels and across the product portfolio. It wasn't densely concentrated in one significantly over the other. If you were to look at the mix, our PBM channel was the largest contributor, followed by strong performance in our self-insured, fully insured and ASO business. Thank you. Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, please press star one one on your telephone. Again, that is star one one to ask a question. Our next question comes from Richard Close with Canaccord Genuity. Your line is open. Great. Thanks for the question and all the success this year. Sean, maybe on GLPs, you know, welcome your perspectives and on how you think about GLP prices coming down and how that impacts the growth opportunity for Omada. You know, I do think there's some fears out there as those prices come down, maybe demand for programs like Omada, you know, gets impacted. Yeah, Richard, thank you for the question. It's certainly an important one. Within that, it's also important to share that the way our accounts and customers view Omada is not a cost on top of their medication spend, but rather a value maximizer of their decision to cover GLP-1s for obesity. Again, right now, the accounts that cover GLP-1s for obesity, it's roughly 45% of the market. They know the cost of that decision, and what they're after is reduced waste. Omada's care tracking capabilities allow us to support them across the entire journey, from helping inform prescription decisions with our new prescribing capabilities to supporting members realize outcomes while on therapy and, of course, to safely discontinue when appropriate. Relative to the price of the meds, we believe these lower price points actually have the potential to increase GLP-1 utilization, which increases access to the medicines and thus increases the need for care track services, like Omada. Equally, for the market where employers say, "Look, I just can't afford these meds," that's where our new GLP-1 Flex Care offering comes in, and that's the 55% of the employer market segment specific to GLP-1s for obesity. Okay. Then, Steve, maybe as a follow-up, I think you mentioned all the new programs are accretive. Can you put that, you know, into perspective in terms of ARPU? That's a great question. We have priced across prescribing cholesterol and our GLP-1 Flex Care, you know, above our current rates. For cholesterol specifically, that's roughly priced in line with hypertension. As we view, you know, as we observe more customers in taking these products, these all have the potential to uplift ARPU above where our current run rates are at $300 per year per average member. As we get more traction in market, again, these are very nascent products. We're just starting out with them. We'll be able to provide more specific guidance on the exact measure of uplift that we're observing as we get traction with some clients. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Our final question comes from Carly Becker with Barclays. Your line is open. Hi, you have Carly on for Saket here. Thanks for taking our question. If we look back to 2018 when Omada launched its diabetes and hypertension programs, can you walk us through what the adoption curve looked like for those programs over time as we think about kind of a parallel to help frame the launch of the cholesterol program? How long did it take to roll out the diabetes and hypertension modules more broadly, and when did you start to see adoption really pick up steam and drive incremental revenue? Yeah, I can start because again, those are good examples of how we love to innovate, which is on the back of really listening deeply to customer needs and asks and ideally finding kind of a one or multiple marquee customers to start the innovation journey with you. That was a couple long-standing customers that had said, "You know what, Omada? We love what you do in prevention in obesity and weight health. Would you consider diabetes?" That started the journey. Then we did highlight the growth rates, you know, which are comparable to prevention, which I think is a statement on how that journey has gone. You know, we're hoping to rinse and repeat with, you know, with, of course, cholesterol, hoping to rinse and repeat with that same process of listening intently on things like GLP-1 prescribing, GLP-1 Flex Care, because we know, you know, based on how those grow, how they can be accretive over time. I don't know, Wei-Li, if you have any comments on top of what I've shared. The only thing I would share on top of would be kind of qualitative and just imagining kind of the intent of the question. You know, that was six, seven years ago, and the Omada that was then in 2018, we're a very different Omada today. Our capabilities are far more evolved across the entire conversion funnel, starting with closing lives with channels and then employers and of course, enrollment rate and engagement and so on and so forth, activation through the numbers. All that to say to me that, you know, I think what would have taken us, you know, three, four years to eventually sell through a payer or a PBM and then build a book of business through employers and then begin to enroll, I think we've gotten better at that. I know we've gotten better at that. So we certainly think that we can beat those time curves in terms of full-scale adoption. The last thing I'd also remind everyone to as well is that our approach over the last few years in innovating and expanding new programs has not really just been looking at TAM, but as Sean mentioned, really listening to our customers. Oftentimes the trigger for us, which accelerates adoption is actually when a customer says, "Boy, if you do this, we'll buy it." We're seeing that reflected with Omada for Cholesterol where a large customer came to us and said, "Hey, we're seeing this being a cost driver in our healthcare spend. We'd love to partner with you all." We built that and immediately went into contracting and launched that customer, you know, earlier this year. The approach there is as such. Last thing here. Just stepping back, what's fun is if you look at all these launches, you know, we believe they really add up. I mean, between GLP-1 prescribing, GLP-1 Flex Care, Omada for Cholesterol. As I reflect on the journey we've been on, we are on pace to roll out more new offerings in 2026 than in any year in the history of our company. What this translates into, of course, is a bigger opportunity set. Translates into new ways to support specific customer needs and we believe a solid foundation for durable growth. Very helpful. Thank you all. Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.