Good morning, and welcome to the Ocean Power Technologies Q4 and full fiscal year 2023 earnings conference call. A webcast of this call is also available and can be accessed by a link on the company's website at www.oceanpowertechnologies.com. This conference call is being recorded and will be available for replay shortly after its completion. On the call today are Dr. Philipp Stratmann, President and Chief Executive Officer, Bob Powers, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, and Joseph DiPietro, Controller, Treasurer, and Principal Accounting Officer. Following the prepared remarks, there will be a question and answer session. Now, I'm pleased to introduce Joseph DiPietro. Sir, please go ahead. Thank you and good morning. After the market closed yesterday, we issued our earnings press release for the period ended April 30th, 2023. Our public filings are available on the SEC website and within the Investor Relations section of the OPT website. During this call, we will make forward-looking statements that are within the Safe Harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may include financial projections or other statements of the company's plans, objectives, expectations, or intentions. These statements are based on assumptions made by management regarding future circumstances over which the company may have little or no control and involve risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause actual results to be materially different from any future results expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The company disclaims any obligation or intention to update the forward-looking statements made on this call. I am pleased to introduce Dr. Philipp Stratmann. Thank you, Joe. Good morning. We appreciate you joining us. Fiscal 2023 was a great year and another step towards positive cash flow for our company. The two top highlights were that we had our best year of revenue generation since fiscal 2015, and we generated our best gross profit since fiscal 2011. We're also entering fiscal 2024 with over $4 million of contracted backlog. These are nice wins for us as we continue executing on our growth strategy. I will focus my comments on two areas, our order pipeline and an update on our key projects. Both are critical to our near-term success. As you know, we serve two main customer groups, the U.S. government and the commercial ocean technology industry. Both view our company as critical to finding cost-effective ways to use and monitor the world's oceans and waterways. We see this in our order pipeline, which continues to grow and now stands at approximately $68 million of various projects in various stages of negotiation. The average order size varies across the product lines, with buoy-based orders, typically several million dollars, and vehicle-based orders closer to the hundreds of thousands of dollars. Decision timing by new and current customers is influenced by budget cycles and offshore installation seasons. I would like to unpack this for you, since it is critically important to understand how these orders will get booked, converted to revenue, and ultimately generate cash to cover our recent OpEx investment and bring us to sustained profitability. Approximately 60 to 70% of our order activity is with government agencies, and another 20 to 25% is with energy companies. The remaining orders are related to a variety of customers, such as wind farms and strategic consulting projects across a wide range of businesses that use water in some ways. This past fiscal year, we had a $9 million order target all year with a pipeline that hovered between $20 million and $30 million. We closed the year at $6 million of closed orders, which is a strong performance compared to recent years, reflects the significant time it takes to get a deal signed, especially in these challenging macroeconomic times, where it seems everyone is cautious and moving slow. The important point I want to make is that none of the potential orders that we have not yet closed went away. They continue to proceed at various speeds, We have a high degree of confidence they will eventually be booked. Another way to look at our order pipeline is by type of project. 30 to 40% of our pipeline is related to WAM-Vs. Generally speaking, the entities we are talking to want multiple WAM-Vs, and we see a steady stream of repeat activity as customers realize how effective the WAM-Vs are to covering massive area and minimizing costs. This acquisition continues to be a great deal for us. 50 to 60% of our pipeline is use of PowerBuoys and our new MDAS to provide coverage for mainly governmental reasons. This includes monitoring of various activities like illegal fishing, border protection, and other classified activities. 5 to 10% is related to strategic consulting. We are one of the few experts, governments, and businesses can turn to when it comes to optimizing the use of oceangoing assets. This gives us an unfair advantage with potential customers courting us first with their needs. Fiscal 2023 was the year we significantly invested in our sales organization for really the first time in our company's history. I appreciate our investors' patience as the team ramps its activity as fast as possible. With the recent onboarding of retired Admiral Joe DiGuardo and several other defense experts, we have a great complement to our sales engine. We are confident that with the right resources to drive activity of WAM-V sales and leases, feasibility studies, demonstrations, and future orders, we now just need to execute. For fiscal 2024, our target for contracted orders is $15 million. Based on the pipeline that is outlined for you, we have a high degree of confidence we will hit this target. We're working hard to create a sense of urgency with our customers so we can get these booked more timely. Our operations teams are ready and are scalable as we close our open deals. I will now move to an update for our key active projects. First is the Digital Horizon exercise with the U.S. Navy. We're currently in our second deployment in Bahrain for use of unmanned surface vehicles with WAM-Vs to support the International Maritime Exercise 2023. Next is the U.S. Department of Energy for the development of a next generation wave energy converter program award. Over the next 18 months, we'll complete phase II by developing and testing a modular and scalable Mass-On-Spring Wave Energy Converter PowerBuoy for reliable powering of autonomous ocean monitoring systems, bringing an entirely new PowerBuoy into our offering. The first offshore demonstration was deployed off the coast of New Jersey in April. As always, we have several ongoing government-related projects which are classified, so we cannot share details. We believe we're a great partner with many government entities and expect that to continue. We had a nice year. The best is yet to come. We have the team and the product portfolio to grow OPT to levels it has not been, but is certainly capable of achieving. With that, I will turn over to Bob for more details on our financials. Thanks, Philipp. Let's start with revenue. For the quarter, our top line was $980,000, which was up 30% from the prior Q4. It was our best quarter in 7+ years. Continued the traction we saw this year. For the year, our revenue was $2.7 million, which is up 55% over last year and is our best year since fiscal 2015. Deferred revenue is another indicator of our sales activity. As a reminder, the biggest component of deferred revenue is related to the $1.1 million MOSWEC PowerBuoy project, which started in December 2022. This project is expected to be active throughout fiscal 2024. For the year, we had $236,000 of gross profit and an 8.6% gross margin. This is the first time since fiscal 2016 that we had gross profit, which we are pleased with. We have a long ways to go until we hit our long-term targets. It's definitely a step in the right direction. Moving to our cost structure, I'd like to take a few seconds to walk you through our recent growth in OpEx and what is driving that. Included here were a full year of expenses related to our MAR acquisition that occurred midway through our prior fiscal year. Included are expenses related to ongoing development of our MDAS product, increases in headcount related to staffing of our sales and marketing leadership team, as well as investments related to the growth in our corporate team. We continue to manage costs tightly with deliberate investments in our sales organization and our WAM-V business. Our sales teams continue to make strong inroads with our growing list of prospective customers, and we believe this additional sales talent investment will be instrumental to maintaining our momentum for fiscal 2024. We expect our OpEx to be materially in line with our level of OpEx for fiscal 2023. You will notice that we moved up the change in value for contingent consideration. As a reminder, that is related to the earn-out obligation we estimate to be paid to the former owners of MAR. The first earn-out period ended April 30th, 2023, and resulted in the maximum payment of $1.5 million per the stock purchase agreement. The second and final earn-out period ends on April 30th, 2024. As of April 30th, 2024, we estimate that the maximum earn-out payment of $1.5 million will be paid out. Moving to the balance sheet. We ended the quarter with $34.9 million of cash, which includes our cash equivalents, restricted cash, and short-term investments. This was down about $6.2 million from before. We continue to operate with no bank debt, with no plans to use debt. Net cash used in operating activities was $21.7 million for the year, with a fairly stable quarterly cadence. A component of this operating cash flow use is the continuing building of inventory related to our WAM-V business. That covers our financial update. We had a nice year, but there is no time for celebration. We still need to convert our order pipeline to book sales and keep us moving on our path to positive cash flow generation. With that, Philipp and I are happy to take your questions. Thank you. We'll now be conducting a question and answer session. If you'd like to be placed in the question queue, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you'd like to remove your question from the queue. One moment please, while we pull for questions. That's star one to be placed in the question queue. Our first question is coming from Shawn Severson from Water Tower Research. Your line is now live. Great. Thank you. Good morning, gentlemen. Good morning, Shawn. How are you? Doing well, thank you. First question is on the backlog. Appreciate all the color on that. That's helpful. Congratulations on the continued push towards the military. I did want to dig in a little bit more into I wouldn't call it backlog. Let's call it your order pipeline. Sorry. What's the mix in there as it comes to, like, longer-term service contracts versus equipment sales? I mean, I know that as a service model is critical to you strategically over the long term, so how is that being reflected in this pipeline as you see it today? Thanks, Shawn. I appreciate the question. you know, as we said, I think in our press release, as we mentioned, we have about, you know, $68 million approximately right now in our order pipeline. That's at various stages of the deal structure. These are all real opportunities that we're working on closing. In there is a very healthy mix between what is the underlying platform versus service delivery component that comes into it. I would also like to point out, as we mentioned in our press release, you know, we're seeing more and more deals like the work we've been doing with Sulmara Subsea, where we have, I think, four vehicles with them now and provide them ancillary services. Those are long-term agreements that span multi-year periods. What's really encouraging with that, and it's what you're seeing with us entering the year with $4 million of contracted backlog that we're working to convert into revenues right now, is the fact that these give us the ability to start building out a revenue baseline as we're scaling up, and then add on top of that. You're entirely right, it is the service component, whether that's data as a service or the platform as a service, opportunities that we bring into it, where we're seeing the improvement in margin primarily. In there, are those orders, I hate to call them pilot programs, because they're not really pilot programs, but I'm trying to understand the scope and scale of the opportunity. When you have a, you know, an opportunity that you're talking about in the pipeline, are these sort of initial test programs and let's try this out and, you know, run some, implement it and see how it goes, and then there's a lot behind that particular, you know, that particular customer or that, or that program? Just a little more color on that would be very helpful. No, absolutely. It varies by customer, but I would say in the majority, it is a case of somebody wanting, you know, in the case of vehicles, okay, somewhere between one and three vehicles initially to do a job. As we've seen, because, you know, as we've shown with like Sulmara and others, those then quickly develop into multi-year, multi-platform opportunities. In case of the buoys, obviously, we're working with an undisclosed government agency at the moment, and we announced that earlier this calendar year. Those are primarily an initial demonstration of the capability of the platforms and the supporting Maritime Domain Awareness Solution, with a view then, once it's been tested for a couple of months, that there's already a discussion ongoing about how this will then turn into what we consider to be a multi-system order. Great. One more question. I'll jump back to the queue, and it's about the expansion of the sales force and the effort there. Can you help me understand what that means? I'm trying to understand the sales and the conversion process. When you say you're adding people there, you're spending more, what does that mean you're doing differently or new, you know, versus what you were doing before? I'm just trying to understand the incremental change and impact with the focus on expanding sales. Yeah. I wouldn't say it's an incremental change. I think I would say it's a material and fundamental change. Okay. Of the current sales team that we have, not a single one has been with OPT for more than two years. This is an entirely new sales team that's been brought in, consisting almost entirely of either veterans of the DoD or DHS, or people that have worked in the defense and security sector, providing new and high-tech solutions in the ocean environment to DoD, DHS, and other parts of the government. What that enables us to do is materially change the conversation we're having with our government counterparties, and I think that is being reflected in the way that our pipeline has shifted, as we've mentioned before, to probably around 60%, 70% U.S. government work, which, you know, we're very proud to support. As the sales process to take a typical, you know, application, are they looking and finding creative applications? Are they being your sales force? I mean, I know you're not just sitting there, you know, taking orders or maybe this will work for this or not. Are you proactively going out? Is that how that works, and say: Look, we know you have a problem, we have a solution. Is that how the sales actually works? Correct. We spend a lot of time with our team working within, you know, the operator community and within the acquisition community, to help them figure out how these new technologies fit into the concept of operations that they might have planned out and fits into helping them solve their problem statement. That enables them to reconfigure the acquisition process, which then enables us to provide the systems into it. Which is coming back to your earlier question, one of the main reasons why we're seeing a lot of initial shorter-term duration, you know, say like two or three quarters deployments of platforms, that then lead to the qualification of those platforms into the operational community. Great. Thank you for the color, guys. Thank you, Shawn. Appreciate you being on. Thank you. Next question is coming from Robert Silvera, from R.E. Silvéra & Associates. Your line is now live. Hi, Philipp. Congratulations on a job, looks very well done. I'd like to go into the balance sheet that you present and look at, for instance, for clarification on the short-term investments. As cash and cash equivalents year-over-year, stay pretty much the same. I mean, it just changed by about $1 million. The short-term investments, of course, dropped quite a bit from $49 million to 28 million, roughly. What is represented by short-term investments? What are they? Type. Yep. Hey, Robert. Thanks for the question. Yes, that the drop that you're seeing in short-term investments is primarily driven through the use of our operating capital. What that represents is high quality, triple A-rated corporate bonds, treasuries. Okay. T-bills for the most part. Yeah. Okay. Obviously, then, that's not the cash equivalents in the cash and cash equivalents? Correct. Yeah. Okay. The cash and cash equivalents would be strictly cash in bank accounts. Right. Got you. Okay, the other, and the other thing is, your inventory number went up substantially from $442,000 to over $1 million. Yes. If I heard right, you're saying that's because of the material purchases to do the WAM-V stuff? Yeah. Yeah, no, absolutely. I think we've mentioned this before. In order for us to be able to supply our customers at the pace which they want to supplied with, and for us to maintain and further gain advantage in the market space, we are building up WAM-Vs at a pace that is quicker than just clearing backlog. That enables us to start building out a call it a rental or lease fleet of vehicles- Got you. that can be made available to customers if they only need it for four weeks. That gives us a competitive advantage. I would expect there to see further increases in inventory as we move through the year. Great. Well, you're building up the money-generating equipment. That's what it amounts to, right? E-e-exactly. Okay. I'm just looking at things that's changed substantially. What are the right of use assets that went basically up $1 million? Yeah. Robert, that's our leases. In particular, that pertains to a new lease that we entered into for our Richmond, California office, which is where our MAR operations are headquartered. We entered into a new lease in April this year. That's more of a GAAP accounting driven treatment as to why that ended up on the balance sheet. I see. Okay. That's very good. In your current liabilities portion, could you kind of go through that and just deal with the ones that have big changes, like the accrued expenses? Where are the accrued expenses going up by approximately, million and a half dollars or so? Yep. The primary driver there is our bonus payable for FY 23. Given our performance in the prior year, we did not have a significant bonus payout. For FY 23, as Philipp just mentioned, given the strong performance there, we do have a larger bonus payout to our employee base. That's the primary driver there. Okay, that will continue on into 2024 based on performance? That's the plan. Yeah, we don't make that decision until the end of the fiscal year in terms of what we'll be paying out. That is the plan. Contract liabilities went up significantly. Yep. What are those liabilities? You can think of that more along the lines of deferred revenue. We've spoken about our contract with the DOE. The DOE actually paid us in advance for that contract, even though we haven't yet performed all the work. The unrecognized revenue relative to what they paid us is sitting in that account. I got you. Very good. Makes a lot of sense. Yeah. I wanna thank you. I think you've done a really good job, and I wish you would release, you know, a public release stating why this outfit that wants to get three people on the board should not be able to. That has to be made very clear to the current shareholders, and soon, you know, giving a history of why these guys who are coming in and trying to basically take over the company by getting the three board members on, is quite detrimental based on their past history and your future, and the good job that everybody on the board and the current employees are doing. I'd like to see that kind of a thing come out, because I hate what's going on with people coming in the way they are. Not making an offer for the company or anything, but just trying to subtly take over the company. No, thank you, Robert. You know, regarding that matter, you know, we refer you and other shareholders back to the press release. You know, at this time, we have no further comment, but we'll certainly make any and all releases public that need to be made public over the coming weeks and months. Okay. You guys are not in favor of that, right? I think as we stated in our public release, you know, we have a very strong strategy that we're executing on. I think the results speak for the fact that we are on track executing against it, having built up a $68 million order pipeline that we're working on converting into contracted orders and subsequently, revenues. I think it's a testament for what the leadership team and the employee base is able to deliver. Okay. Based on that, $68 million, which is a good chunk of cash in the future, over what period of time is represented by that $68 million? one year, two years, four years? What? That $68 million is orders we are currently discussing at various stages. I can't give you an exact timeline in terms of, you know, is it three quarters, four quarters, five quarters, or six quarters? It is within around that type of timeframe. This is not a. So- This isn't us going out and saying, "This is the total available market or the serviceable market." This is what we're actively negotiating today and working on. That's what I like to hear. In effect, within two to three years, it's reasonable to assume that you could win those orders and have $68 million in sales and revenue? I think certainly, you know, as we convert the pipeline, that is what we're working on. Exactly. That's what I wanted to hear. Very good, guys. You're doing a good job, obviously, the horizons are looking good with numbers like $68 million compared to where we are today, and then within a timeframe of two to three years. Thank you, Philipp. Good job. Thank you, Robert, and thanks for your continued interest in OPT. Thank you. As a reminder, that's star one to be placed in the question queue. Our next question is coming from R.J. Tanner, from Tanner Capital Management. Your line is now live. Hi, thanks. Thanks, guys. I've observed that the company's never been profitable in any quarter and not in any quarter under your watch as CEO. When you took over, you indicated that you were restructuring it, and yet today, the situation seems worse than when you started two years ago. The losses are growing and cash is diminishing. You badly missed the order booking target you announced last year. Why should shareholders vote for a board that is blind to shareholder returns, while hefty bonus comp is paid to managers, free stock is given to board members, and the board fees grow? Thanks, RJ, appreciate the question. As, as we've said, you know, we've restructured the company. We've built a strong order pipeline. We're executing on our strategy. We are working towards profitable growth. Thank you. Next question is a follow-up from Shawn Severson from Water Tower Research. Your line is now live. Great. Thanks for taking the question again, guys. Mine is on the trying to understand the expansion when you talk about government, you know, government contracts and government projects. Is it, are the things you learn there, and the technology and the application, is there anything about that that crosses, you know, security lines in a sense that you couldn't offer it or a similar solution to, say, another government or back into, you know, commercial industry, or for any other applications for that matter? I'm trying to understand when you build up this military presence and footprint, what does that do with the IP and the application? Thanks, Shawn. As we've said, I mean, as we've been public about, you know, some of our work has been in the more public demonstrations being organized by the Department of Defense, such as Digital Horizon out in Bahrain, where the Fifth Fleet is headquartered. Other work that we're doing, you know, obviously, is likely, at some stage, to fall under efforts where we, where, you know, we can't disclose exactly what it is working on and falls under the realms of classified programs. We are making sure that certainly, you know, the value to the company is, to the shareholders, is preserved as we work through these projects, at the same time, being able to deliver our capability to enhance, you know, national security and provide the services that our nation's warfighter need. Thank you. We've reached the end of our question and answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to management for any further closing comments. Thank you. We appreciate you joining us. We are pleased with our progress to date and look forward to the future. We know what we need to do. For the first time in our history, we have the right resources and the right products and services. We believe fiscal 2024 will be a great year. As always, thank you to my fellow OPT colleagues, our shareholders, our potential shareholders of our company, and our vendors. We appreciate your confidence in the direction we are headed. Have a great rest of your day. Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.