Greetings, and welcome to the Pegasystems Q3 2023 Earnings Results Conference Call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A brief question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. If anyone should require operator assistance during the conference, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Peter Welburn, Vice President, Corporate Development and IR for Pegasystems. Please go ahead. Thank you, Priscilla, and good morning, everyone, and welcome to Pegasystems Q3 2023 earnings call. Before we begin, I would like to read our safe harbor statement. Certain statements contained in this presentation may be construed as forward-looking statements as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words expects, anticipates, intends, plans, believes, will, could, should, estimates, may, forecast, and guidance, or variations of such words and other similar expressions identify forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date the statement was made and are based on current expectations and assumptions. Because such statements deal with future events, they are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Actual results for fiscal 2023 and beyond could differ materially from the company's current expectations. Our press release announcing our Q3 2023 earnings and our SEC filings, including our most recent annual report, describe factors that could impact our results and cause them to materially differ from those expressed in forward-looking statements. Investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Matters contained in forward-looking statements may not occur. Later events, new information, or other factors may cause our views to change, but we will not publicly update or revise forward-looking statements unless required by law to do so. With that, I will turn the call over to Alan Trefler, founder and CEO of Pegasystems. Thank you, Peter, and to everyone who's joined today's call. It's great to see us improve performance in an uncertain macroeconomic environment. Now more than ever, we are focused on running a business that balances growth and free cash flow. And it's especially good to see record cash flow as we come out of our subscription transition, and we're just getting started. Ken will go into more detail on our financial results in a moment. As I mentioned last quarter, we've been finding additional ways to engage effectively and efficiently with our clients. The transformation of our go-to-market model is delivering on our goal of deepening client relationships. This helps drive more meaningful engagement across multiple teams as those relationships strengthen. And I was excited to spend most of Q3 on the road, meeting with clients, prospects, and partners globally. Coming off the tremendous momentum from PegaWorld and the launch of Infinity 2023, it was terrific to spend this direct time with these constituencies. I recently had a round-the-world trip, and it was good to see folks I had not had a chance to see at PegaWorld. I met face to face with over 100 clients and partners and had terrific conversations across the board, across the U.S., with Amazon, Bank of America, UnitedHealth Group, and then even to India with Verizon, where they, like many of our clients, are establishing global competency centers, and we're having a chance to engage our Indian team directly with them. Going down to APAC with ANZ Bank, National Australia Bank, and multiple government agencies across APJ, and in London with HSBC, Lloyds, and Vodafone, as well as with the dozens of our partners around the world, including Accenture, Capgemini, Cognizant, EY, and Infosys. So what I'll tell you also is our US briefing center continues to be extremely busy this year. We've had hundreds of meetings with clients like ING, Mondelez, Navy Federal Union, and Scotiabank, where their staff have really come in to do a deep dive on topics ranging from Pega strategy to Pega Cloud. We have many more plans for Q4. And in Q3, we kicked off a series of account-based marketing client events to continue the momentum of PegaWorld, with 75 regional and client-specific events planned, and we're going to have even more before the end of the year. I'm really enjoying being back on the road in a significant way, and I'm terrifically excited about the level of engagement and dialogue we're having. Even though you can accomplish a lot remotely, meeting in person provides a different type of opportunity to dig in and understand what's top of mind for our clients. Now, as I've done this, I have had a chance to really hear firsthand what the client interests and questions are about what Pega can do, and does Pega have a unique advantage in this current environment? What I'll tell you is that AI, no surprise, has become central to nearly every client conversation, and their questions are following, falling into a few categories. First, what should their AI strategy be? Where does Pega fit in? Second, how can they protect and govern their proprietary customer data? And third, how can they address the risks associated with GenAI, such as hallucinations, where the AI provides a response not backed up by data or best process? And this, these places, are where Pega technology and experience gives us a unique competitive advantage, in my view. Let me elaborate. First, in terms of strategy, we have decades of hands-on experience helping clients leverage AI, and we can use this to help them with their strategy.... We have perfect insights into the most successful early use cases for GenAI, and those we believe will deliver the highest return on investment. And we're showing them to our clients and getting tremendous, tremendous positive feedback. You know, one of the best things that actually any of you can try is this interactive demo on pega.com that shows how we have linked generative AI into the core thinking of how Pega workflow should work, and how it can help you create all the necessary elements, using the knowledge of the internet to be able to bring best practices into a business. You'll see within seconds the workflows, the users, the data model, and the other key elements identified. We launched it when Pega Infinity went live in mid-September, and in the first month, thousands of people from around the world accessed the demo and did over 6,000 workflow generations, from employee onboarding to a cricket scoreboard generator. Now, I would suggest that anybody interested in understanding how this can be done really practically, go find it and try it. It's free. It's on pega.com. Just go to the site, either take the interactive tour that we have or just search for GenAI and check out the interactive demo, which is what I've just been talking about. Try building an app for your current firm or a business that you've been thinking about starting when you retire, and I think you'll share in the excitement of how Pega is in a position to really bring this technology home in a very unique way. We've had a lot of fun, and a lot of clients have gotten very jazzed and interested in this. You can even try it on your mobile phone, and you can be building these sorts of things right from your mobile phone, and it, it's also quite a good demo there. So when customers see what we're able to do, see what we're shipping in Pega Infinity '23, we get a very positive reaction in terms of how we can add powerful and pragmatic capabilities to their businesses. Now, in terms of where Pega fits into their strategy, you need to remember that while most companies continue to think about GenAI as a code generator, Pega, at its core, is based on the concept of a business model that brings a structure and system that can evolve as the client needs or the industry needs, and the customer needs evolve. Instead of code, with our GenAI, we generate business logic into a model that organizes the business objectives and lets the AI be understood, let it be reviewed, adjusted, curated, and approved. And the center of this is what you've heard me refer to as our unique Situational Layer Cake. This is something that organizes the way a business runs into layers, with some elements operating across the business as a whole, some on a division, some perhaps in a department, and some for different customer segments or different regions or geographies. This unique structure organizes all the enterprise assets, the processes, the rules, the data models, and UI into these layers, which are designed for reuse. They're the perfect architecture for using GenAI with, and it's what gives Pega a unique, and I believe, sustainable advantage, because you'll plug GenAI in when the rules and workflows are defined, and they'll be able to complement what already exists. They'll be able to let you change pieces of your business or workflow at a time, and they provide, I think, a power that's very, very different than a lot of the hype that's out there. Because users are looking at a model versus looking at code, they can actually collaborate, and the business users have transparency working with IT, and it provides that vehicle for governance when changes are introduced and makes them all manageable. So in short, it takes the output from the AI and organizes it in a way that really helps businesses build for change. And it's proprietary to Pega. I don't think it can be readily copied or reproduced, and, we don't see anybody else taking this approach, and we really feel good about what this means for us. So we've also get created about 20 GenAI boosters with Pega Infinity. That makes the GenAI practical. It makes it all real, and you can also see those described at pega.com. Now, secondly, relative to data, we will be able to help clients protect and govern customer data through the powerful capabilities in our software. Pega's audit trail capabilities, which have been described as the best in the industry, are robust and comprehensive. And third, we address GenAI risks by leveraging a platform which is designed to help customers deploy all of their processes and their AI effectively and responsibly, responsibly. Clients can see what's happening and help identify where AI is working in their models, and help them understand when the AI is doing something that makes sense and when it's generating nonsense. Our robust capabilities also help clients confirm that the data that powers AI decisioning is unbiased and comprehensive, using our unique ethical bias check, which helps identify and eliminate biases hidden in the AI. Are flagging possible discriminatory offers and messages generated by AI before they reach the customer. This unique capability helps clients pinpoint any offending elements and adjust the algorithms to ensure fair outcomes. Now, the client response we're having to this is very, very exciting and inspiring, and it's wonderful to see our clients now beginning to work on this and taking it very, very much to heart. I think, as we move into 2024, we're going to complement what we've already released here in 2023 with a great new pipeline of features that are going to very, very aggressively continue to the extent of the power of these game-changing capabilities, but also leveraging our unique architecture. Before I wrap up, wrap up, I also want to provide a quick update on Pega Launchpad, our new cloud-based, low-code application development platform for building business-to-business SaaS applications that we announced last year. It's a, it's a gorgeous piece of software, and the team has done a tremendous job in staying focused and supporting our early adopters, and we now have our first handful of Launchpad clients. We're really excited to ramp this business up in 2024 and beyond. So in summary, we continue to improve our performance, and, as we come out of this subscription transition, we see the cash improving despite the uncertain macro environment. The transformation of our go-to-market model is improving our sales efficiency and our engagement, focusing on really deepening the critical relationships that drive our business. Our unique technology architecture is a competitive advantage that lends itself to really leveraging GenAI in a way that I don't see our competitors easily replicating. It is going to be a big and long-lasting distinction. We continue to make good progress. We continue to make good progress in becoming a Rule of 40 company, balancing growth with fiscal discipline, and to provide more color on the financial results, let me now turn it over to our COO and CFO, Ken Stillwell. Ken? Thanks, Alan. Through the first three quarters of 2023, we've made meaningful progress improving our cash flow while maintaining double-digit ACV growth. We're managing the company with a Rule of 40 mindset. The principle at a well-run firm's growth rate and free cash flow margin should meet or exceed 40%. I've got some exciting news to share later on the call regarding our free cash flow. Now, I'm going to start this morning with the most important metric to measure the success of our business, growth and annual contract value, or ACV. This year, we've experienced a macroeconomic environment that's not noticeably worse than last year, but it's certainly not much better. Our clients are still buying, but they're scrutinizing things more closely. Sales cycles are a little longer than they've been for the last few years. Despite that, our sales team delivered a good Q3 with significant contributions from EMEA and from our financial services clients. Through the first three quarters of 2023, total contract value, TCV bookings, increased by about 20% year-over-year. I think that's just an important measure to complement our ACV, and backlog performance. Given the strong level of activity we experienced in Q3, our new go-to-market strategy is clearly leading to deeper engagement with our clients. As a result, ACV grew 12% year-over-year, with currency helping our growth by around 2%. We, like numerous other companies, received an SEC comment letter related to standardizing our free cash flow measures. As you know, the more traditional way to calculate free cash flow is to take cash flow from operations and subtract capital expenditures. Going forward, this is the approach we will use. Going forward, we're not adding back one-time cash items, such as restructuring charges, to calculate and adjust, and adjust free cash flow. However, we will continue disclosing in our earnings release, cash items that we believe are not representative of our ongoing operating performance. As we enter 2024, we do not anticipate one-time cash items being a big part or a big item of interest for investors. Over the first three quarters of 2023, Pega generated $138 million of cash flow from operations and $124 million of free cash flow. In Q3 alone, we added $24 million of free cash flow. $124 million is the highest amount of free cash flow dollars generated in the first three quarters of a year in the history of the company. We increased our cash and marketable securities by $60 million year to date, and that's given our almost $100 million of convert repurchase. As we outlined during the most recent investor session at PegaWorld in June, our multi-year plan to improve our free cash flow features three key levers. First, we need to expand total gross margin. We're confident we can continue to expand total gross margin by scaling our Pega Cloud business, increasing cloud automation, implementing Kubernetes, and multi-tenancy. And our most recent results confirm that we're making progress. In Q3, on a trailing 12-month basis, non-GAAP total gross margin increased to just over 74%, a 129 basis point improvement year-over-year. Our key driver of our gross margin improvement is non-GAAP Pega Cloud gross margin, which increased 430 basis points from 69% to just under 73% on a trailing-twelve-month basis. Another lever to improve our free cash flow is to improve sales efficiency, which we view as the most important of the three levers. As you know, we made the difficult decision to reduce our headcount in the last year, with the majority of those reductions coming from the sales and marketing organization. It's difficult to deliver double-digit growth while at the same time improving sales efficiency.... We spend more than $500 million annually on sales and marketing. That's a pretty big number, and we need to make sure that we're leveraging that to drive our growth. The last lever is really just to, as we improve our free cash flows, to enhance our operating leverage by growing total other costs, like general administrative and R&D, to make sure that those spend at a slower pace than our ACV growth. At a company our size, we should definitely be able to exhibit operating leverage as we scale. Over the last year, we've taken action to simplify our go-to-market motion. For software companies like ours, the enemy of sales efficiency and effectiveness is often complexity. So we've eliminated layers of management, further clarified team roles, focused our sales team on cross-selling and upselling into our existing clients, making sure that all of our teams are aligned. Taking together, these actions are helping to improve our sales efficiency, and you can see the results in our financials. On a non-GAAP basis, total sales and marketing spend as a percentage of revenue declined from 47%-38% year-over-year in Q3 on a trailing 12-month basis. Our focused execution on balancing growth and profit is positively impacting our profitability, generating $124 million of free cash flow, as I mentioned, in the first three quarters of 2023, and it shows progress across all of our levers. It's a big change from the negative free cash flow of $36 million generated in the first three quarters of 2022. I've also got some good news to share regarding our free cash flow trajectory as we go forward. Based on where we are year to date and our global team's successful execution on our plan, I'm confident that we've got a shot to deliver more than $200 million of free cash flow in 2023. I'm excited that our team's in a position to deliver the highest annual cash flow in the history of the company, and Q4 is typically our strongest cash flow generation quarter of the year. To be clear, we do not update guidance quarterly, and I'm not creating any type of precedent or officially updating free cash flow guidance for 2023. I'm just sharing my current thoughts on our free cash flow trajectory as we approach the completion of 2023. In prior calls, we have shared some thoughts on modeling our business, and we've received feedback that this practice is helpful, so I've decided to reinforce those again today. First, let me start with free cash flow. I know that making a change in how we present free cash flow might be considered somewhat unusual, so we've added a table in our earnings release to show the free cash flow quarterly, just to help with your modeling. The table also separately discloses items that affect our cash flow and are considered by management not to be representative of the core business operations, such as restructuring costs. Second, our prior 2023 annual free cash flow guidance included these adjustments. So going forward, our free cash flow guidance will be consistent with a more conventional methodology. Lastly, we did close more term license deals in the quarter than is typical. Our term license bookings are strongest in the first and the final quarters of the year, so a strong term license booking result in Q3 is not typical. However, we view the growth in ACV as the most critical measure, and our clients sometimes decide to use Client Cloud versus Pega Cloud, and we will support them when they make that decision. This year, we've continued to make progress on our journey to improve our cash flow, while at the same time maintaining a double-digit ACV growth rate, excuse me, an ACV growth rate, in what continues to be a more uncertain selling environment. Our team is clearly embracing a Rule of 40 mindset and doing a much better job of managing the trade-offs between growth and profit. The world's greatest software companies do not only achieve the Rule of 40 in a single year, but they do it consistently and over sustained periods of time. That's our objective, to be the kind of company that balances growth and profit over the long term, and we look forward to closing out 2023 in the next few months. As I wrap up today, I wanted to announce that our annual investor session will be held on Monday, June 10th, the MGM Hotel in Las Vegas, during PegaWorld. Please mark your calendars. I look forward to seeing you all on the road as we get out to meet current and potential investors in November and December. One last point, the date for our oral argument in our Virginia appeal is now scheduled for November fifteenth. Although it will likely be months before we know the result, it's still great to have the appeal now scheduled and in front of us. With that, operator, please open the call for questions. Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the questioning queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your question from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your headset before pressing the keys. One moment, please, while we pull for questions. Our first question comes from Steve Enders with Citi. Please go ahead. Okay, great. Thanks for taking the questions this morning. Maybe just to start, I just want to get a better understanding for, you know, when you talk about uncertain macro and that kind of continuing, what that actually looks like in terms of the deal environment that you're seeing out there. And maybe, you know, how have things maybe changed so far in October from the conversations and the deal environment that you're seeing today? Yeah, I would say that, you know, the mood in a lot of clients has, for the last year plus, candidly, been just more questioning. It's entirely consistent with organizations really doing, you know, candidly, a better level of scrutiny than when money was free. You know, people are acting now across the board, like they're really respecting businesses that are in a position to deliver profitability. So you get more checking of types of deals, and that can lead to slightly longer sales cycles. I will tell you, I'm not seeing anything that is troubling as we enter the Q4. The reality is that customers also really, really want to set their businesses up for success in 2024, and I've had conversations with many clients that see us as being central to how they're gonna gain the real efficiencies, which isn't around the cost of software, but is really around the cost of their operations and their ability to engage. But as I think I've said over the last year, we've been through lots of recessionary periods, and when things get a little tougher, even if we're not in a recession, I think people are kinda acting a little like we are. Even if, you know, when that happens, we sort of aim the needle, as it were, at how do we deliver really tangible things for clients as opposed to focusing on generating revenue, which when things are happier, everybody wants to spend time on that. Does that give you some color? No, definitely. That's helpful context there, especially for the Q4 view. So definitely appreciate the commentary there. And then maybe shifting gears a little bit more to the sales and marketing changes and initiatives. Yeah, I guess as we think about what that means for closing out the year and the improvement in productivity and efficiency there, I guess what has been the feedback from customers that you've talked to in terms of, you know, the impact that could potentially have? As we think about the free cash flow impact both in the quarter moving forward, I guess how should we be thinking about, you know, the impact that those changes would be having to the cash flow specifically? So there's a couple pieces to that question. So let me see if I can hit a couple pieces, Steve. So the first is, we made changes, we made some organizational changes in the last few months. And those, you know, those are, you know, those are never easy, and, and we have a lot of empathy for the people that were impacted. Those changes have not actually resulted in any improvement in free cash flow for the business yet, as you might imagine. And they will have a very small, if any, impact, even in Q4, the actions taken. However, they'll have a full year impact in 2024. So that's just something that's almost kind of on the shelf for an improvement in 2024. I wanted to also clarify one thing. When I talk about achieving $200 million in free cash flow, I'm actually referring to the new, more traditional measure. If you were to take into account one-time items, et cetera, naturally, under the way that we were previously talking about, that number would be much higher. So just to clarify that, because I know that was maybe a little, a little vague in my script. I'd also say that we worked very hard, and I think the team did a great job to take and make the changes so that we could enter Q4 with the changes behind us, and we've basically done that. So I'm not expecting that, you know, we would, we would tell you next year that Q4 had been materially implemented by change. Right now, I would say we're in the heavy execution mode. Okay, perfect. Great to hear. Thanks for taking the question. Thanks, Steve. Our next question comes from Tejal Vora with J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks, guys, for taking the questions. Can I ask you about the term out performance? What drove that? Was federal part of it or anything else to kind of call out? Secondly, on cloud ACV growth, that seems to continue to decelerate, and I hear your point on overall ACV growth being more important. But as you launch Infinity 23, which adds kind of a lot of GenAI capabilities on the cloud side, I believe, should we expect the cloud ACV growth to kind of cross at some point going forward? Yeah. So, great question. So when you see quarters, so if you look at, you know, kind of newer organizations or even newer, kind of activity that a client is doing, there is a higher amount of those that typically go Pega Cloud. That is kind of because Pega Cloud- when you have clients that may expand existing workflows, existing relationships, they may bring on a new project, and they already are managing Pega in a client cloud environment, naturally, that's the way that they would purchase or expand their relationship with Pega. So when you see quarters where you typically have a higher percentage of kind of term versus SaaS, the primary driver for that is probably just a little bit outsized expansion with existing clients that may not... Now, many of our clients have both, so it kind of depends on which application environment they're or which set of use cases they're expanding. But that's typically... It's really not, it's not a change in strategy or change in buying behavior. It just comes down not to, like, how kind of how you how the difference between the two and in terms of, like, a net new workload versus existing workload. So, that's kind of why you might see the drop. I would also say that based on just the vibrations in the market here as we enter Q4, I'd be surprised if we don't see a pickup in the cloud rates, as we go into the next quarter or two. Yeah, that's. I think that's. I mean, but you've, Vincent, you know that the difference between a Q4 typically had a little bit more client cloud license, and that's typically because that tends to be a period where you have clients kind of look at increasing their spend with us during a renewal period. So just think about that kind of same activity can happen sometimes in other quarters. Yeah, understood. Just to be clear, for this quarter, in turn, were there any very large deals that swung kind of the number towards, towards the positivity, one or two large deals, or? No, it wasn't actually. No, and in our movement, that's a very fair question. But no, Q3 was not skewed by, like, one deal or two deals of that. And also, as we move a little bit more towards, as we refer to it, a more consumption-based, you do actually have more repeatable growth and not as many very large kind of shock deals. Clients are increasing over time, as opposed to in our previous model, even in the perpetual model, there tended to be kind of whales, as we used to call them. Got it. Thank you very much. Yep. Our next question comes from Jake Roberge with William Blair. Please go ahead. Hey, thanks for taking the questions. Alan, when you're talking to customers, where are the dollars for AI spend coming from? Are they coming from existing IT budgets and maybe crowding out other areas of spend, or are you seeing customers net new budget dollars and potentially actually expand their overall IT spend to account for those investments? So we're seeing both, and happily, we are seeing the innovation budgets starting to come forward. We've had with a client actually just yesterday announced they were putting another several $100 million into their innovation budget, which is a great thing to hear from a client that we're currently selling to. So I think that it will affect some traditional spend, for sure, but they're really looking to make sea changes in their business over the next couple of years, and they're all not wanting to fall behind. Very helpful. Then, Ken, do you still feel Pega is on track to complete the subscription transition this year? And then, I know you put out those targets of being a Rule of 40 business as you exit 2024. Given constant currency, ACV growth ticked down to 10% this quarter, how should we think about the balance between growth and margin as you look to reach those targets? So we, we do believe we'll be done with the subscription transition. In fact, I would, I would even say, go as far as to say we're really done now. We've had a few years where our perpetual license revenue has been under 5% of our total book. Perpetual bookings have been under 5% for now, probably four years maybe. And so I think the business has normalized much more. Naturally, we'll have variability quarter to quarter, and you do have the unfortunate accounting of six zero six. But that said, take that aside, the billings, the consistency of billings, the predictability of billings, that is very much normalized in our business now, Jake. And then when you think about exiting 2024, I mean, it certainly looks to us that 2024 would exit with a, you know, a much higher contribution on the free cash flow than the growth. Just even where we are now, naturally, if, you know, as a rule of 30 type company, cash flow is higher than our growth rate. And I think it's, you know, being realistic about where we thought we would land, you know, we always kind of have this model of, you know, a 15, 25 kind of company was kind of, you know, a very nice, sustainable model. And so we have a little work to do on the growth side, but I think we're well on track to actually, you know, you know, be a kind of mid to high twenties, you know, free cash flow company in 2024. That's our goal. You know, naturally, we're still another quarter away from thinking about our guidance for 2024, but you know, we've been very transparent that that's our objective. Helpful. Thanks for taking my questions. Sure. CJ. Our next question comes from Kevin Kumar with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Thanks for taking my question. Alan, you called out EMEA in your script, so just curious if you can expand on the health of the customer base in those regions and just the overall kind of macro environment there. Thanks. Yeah, I, I would say that if you go back a couple of quarters, EMEA was looking a little tepid. I was very pleased with my last visit, and I'm actually coming back there in Q4 because we see things that are, are set to be done. So I'm, I'm seeing a return in most of the countries in EMEA, not, not all of them. Some of them are still a little tougher, I would say Germany, for instance. But the UK, you know, there's a lot of political stuff going on there, but they're very interested in trying to figure out how to reframe those businesses to be more profitable. Great. And then maybe give... Can you give an update on the government vertical? What use cases are you best positioned for, and just in general, the level of deal activity that you're seeing in that vertical? Yeah, we're seeing a lot of activity in that vertical, and we just hired Jen Pratt, a new senior executive who we announced, who is pushing forward to really, I think, help us be much more effective in that vertical. So I'm very excited, and I love the way she's coming up to speed, though she has only been here a couple of months now. What I've seen in that vertical is a lot of interest. You know, our bellwether clients like the IRS, you know, and the FBI and Department of Justice, there's a lot of stuff going on, and there are major needs in those businesses. The use cases we do is we handle serious, you know, workflows. You know, candidly, there are workflows that are kind of pushing tickets around. Those are not the Pega workflows. The Pega workflows is where you actually take a meaningful piece of work that has typically a lot of data associated in it and with it, that has to live over a long period of time, which is perfect for the government environment, and that needs a combination of automation, auditing, and improved citizen engagement, which is now, you know, increasingly top of mind for organizations. So government, not just in the US, but when I take a look at what's going on with some major, major work we're doing in the UK, when I look at work we're actually doing in Germany, the trip I just took to APAC, we have more than a dozen government systems running in Singapore, for instance. I'm seeing lots of things in every region that make me feel great about what Pega does for government. And just one additional comment on that. If you think about a vertical, so to speak, that is more prone to keep legacy applications plugged in, but be able to try to modernize kind of at the user layer, like at the user layer, which really feeds well into Pega orchestrating and being able to interact and interface with, you know, with data systems that have maybe embedded in the government. I mean, that is a very strong value proposition to be able to improve the customer experience, the applications, modernize, go to cloud, but yet still interact with some of these systems that they really just, the government really just can't mothball. Great. Thank you both. Our next question comes from Rishi Jaluria with RBC. Please go ahead. Oh, wonderful. Thanks, guys, so much for taking my questions. Maybe I want to go back to better understanding the macro impact and more specifically, think about what are customers and partners saying about large-scale digital transformations? Because we've been hearing from partners that those are things that a lot of customers might be dragging their feet on, given the uncertain macro. But simultaneously, I'd have to imagine as companies are contemplating their generative AI strategies, digital transformation to enable that and integrate workflows becomes more and more important. Maybe can you help us, you know, understand what you're seeing in terms of those and kind of weighing the puts and takes about both the near-term macro, as well as how customers are kind of trying to position themselves long-term to embrace generative AI, you know, and your role in enabling that. And then I've got a quick follow-up. Sure. So I... That's a good question. I would say there are actually a couple of parallel threads to pull on here. So there's no question when the macro becomes a little more dour, that organizations want to make sure what they're really investing in is practical and pragmatic. So they want to make sure that what they're going to see is going to have results. And Pega is very, very well equipped for that environment. We've switched ourselves away from the, you know, "Boy, we help you really boost revenue," much more to, "Hey, we're going to help you make decisions better. We're going to help you drive workflows better in ways that literally get the work done." So that's, you know, something that I think we're well suited for. There is a lot of buzz around generative AI, but there's also a lot of what I would describe as clients dabbling in experimentation. Customers are trying to figure it out, and so a lot of them are trying, they're buying, they're getting developers to build things. Lots of, lots of little pots stirring, but they're also looking for the places in which gen AI can be used to really drive that previous category, that the category of really differently approaching pragmatic results. And, I've seen customers get really excited about what we can do. I was visiting with a client who put Pega into one of its call centers to be able to use what we call Voice AI, to be able to interpret and fill in screens and do a whole variety of things to massively improve productivity, which, you know, costs they're looking for, but also it significantly reduces average handle time and improves the customer experience. So you know, I think it's going to be interesting for the investing community to try to delineate what action in the market is tied to the AI hype and the experimentation, which in some cases is not going to persist, and what's going to be tied to the real core systems evolutions that are going to work now and going to work into future years. Does that help? Yeah, absolutely. Very, very helpful. Thanks, Alan. And then Ken, just a follow-up for you on the gross margin side. So you continue to show pretty impressive cloud gross margin expansion. How should we be thinking about terminal gross margins on the cloud side? You know, especially as you do have a little bit of multi-tenancy around the core. You are embracing Kubernetes. You know, is this something that over time could become an 80% cloud gross margin business, or is there anything structural that might be holding you back from that? Thanks. Yeah, great question. So, I will say this with a level of confidence, but also, you know, we have to get there. When we first started Pega Cloud, we were hoping to get to 70%, and then when we got close to 65, we said: "You know, we should be 75." And now that we're approaching 75, we're saying we should be 80. And so I do see a path to 80. I don't know how hard it will be to get much above 80. It might be... It might be surprisingly easy, it might be terribly difficult. But I would say now that we're approaching 75, we definitely see a path to 80. All right. Wonderful. Thank you so much, guys. See you, Rishi. Our next question comes from Raimo Lenschow with Barclays. Please go ahead. Hey, thank you. This quarter, we obviously had the term was much better than cloud. And you kind of talked about some of the reasons there. If you think about the next steps for you guys now as we kind of you know maneuvering through the downturn, are there any plans to kind of double-click more on the cloud side? Or is that, you know, do you think you will continue to stay on that, the customer has the choice there? And then one, Ken, for you, like, if I think about the margin progression, obviously very good progress this year, but as we get ready for more AI investments, we potentially better times ahead, how do you think about that balance of growth versus investment for going forward? Thank you. So, I'll take the first one, and maybe, Alan, you can give your thoughts on AI and how AI might help the margin profile of us and our clients. So, the first piece, we are fully committed to Pega Cloud as being what we really are excited about our clients leveraging. That said, we understand clients are on a journey to get there, and we want to support them through that journey. In some cases, that journey may take longer than we may hope that it would, because they have unique operational needs, and quite frankly, they may not be ready to move to cloud at the pace that other companies will. So, our commitment to Pega Cloud is unchanged. Completely committed, completely committed to scale it and modernize it, make the experience better for clients, always automate, et cetera, improve margins. But that said, we are not moving away from our ability to support our clients and client choice. So that's our stance. Alan, you want to talk a little bit about AI and how that might fit into the margin profile? Yes. So, I think this is going to be really interesting as we go forward. And, those of you who were there may recall that in my closing presentation at PegaWorld, which was in June, I stood up and I said, we're going to be using these new technologies, which many of which we've now released, more are coming as soon as Q1. We're going to use these new technologies to do four things. And, just to re-highlight the two that are relevant to your question, one is to put Pega at your fingertips. So to radically change the training and education and ease of use profile of Pega technology by using this to really help people build and guide faster. And the second is what we... I actually said we were going to report in June, which is, you know, a little bit of a time, but coming up upon us, that I expected that we'd have double productivity of people building in Pega, which should open up a major stream of new opportunities for our clients to get results faster and better. The other piece is we also have many through these sort of accelerators that we built or these GenAI capabilities, important new features that will also make the customer's operations more productive and improve their cost profile as well, through the use of GenAI. So we have a lot that we are working on right now that I think is going to very, very much change the view as we enter 2024 and as we go through 2024. Okay. Thank you. Our next question comes from Mark Schappel with Loop Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Hi, thank you for taking my question. Alan, starting with you, I appreciate your comments on generative AI in your prepared remarks. And look, I realize it's still early for that solution, but are you seeing the offering attract like a new type of customer to the company? Yes, I am. I'm seeing the... Remember, we have a target organization structure, so it's really a new type of buyer inside the customer. And if you want to really get a feel for this, just go to that generative AI page on Pega.com that I mentioned, which we sit with business buyers. You know, you think of this as being in many ways a technical part of the sale, but we sit with business buyers, and we say: Why don't you put in?... Whatever workflows you're worried about or whatever ways of doing business that you're concerned about. The most interesting I had at the Sibos International Banking Conference a month ago, we had a senior executive from a large UK bank come and ask to see what should the process be for closing the account of a politically exposed person. If you've read the news, you may note that the, I believe it was the CEO of Coutts was fired because they had done that inappropriately. And what came out was mind-blowing, and it completely changes the whole way you think about how you want to operate and develop processes. So, try it, and we've got a whole generation, a whole new area of buyers where we didn't use to have something like that, that we could show before, and now we've got thousands in there playing with it. That's helpful. Thank you. Then, Ken, on the go-to-market front, I believe you noted organizational changes to the sales team that coincided with the workforce reductions. I wonder if you could just detail a little bit further what those org changes were. I assume you somewhat flattened the sales organization. Well, we're referring to the changes that we had previously disclosed and we talked about, Mark, which is to put a lot of the selling type resources closer to the client, to put a lot of our technical, both pre-sales and post-sales, resources, kind of, you know, closer together so that we could actually have, like, kind of a continuous engagement from pre-sales to post go live. We've looked at the kind of the state, the hierarchy of the organization in terms of the layers, the number of management layers. We've looked at, you know, bringing people kind of that did similar type roles into a unified mission. Those are the types of activities that we have that really were part of what I was referring to. It's good to have that all behind us. Yep. Yeah, as we enter Q4. Great, thanks. Our next question comes from Joe Meares with Truist Securities. Please go ahead. Great, thanks for taking the questions, guys. I had another question about the headcount reductions. Are you guys planning to rely more on partners now in light of reducing headcount in sales and marketing? And then just as far as it was helpful to hear that it's not gonna add to free cash flow in 2023. And, you know, not asking you to guide to 2024, but just curious what the potential dollar impact from the sales and marketing could be there. And, you know, the fact that you're gonna be getting over $200 million in free cash flow potentially this year, does that bring that three to five year, $500 million free cash flow target closer to the three-year end of that range? Thank you. I'll take the last part of your question. We feel great about the progress that the organization's made in the results. Naturally, some of the decisions we made are hard, but we had to make them. When you think about an annual run rate impact of a change like that, a rule of thumb that I always use is what the restructuring charge is, times four. That's just an easy rule of thumb. I would say most companies kind of have that type of situation. So if you look at our charge times four, that's typically the run rate savings. You know, you're probably talking $60 million-$70 million of kind of annual kind of run rate impact from the change that we made last quarter. And now when you talk about, like, us getting to $500 million, listen, we're, you know, we're thinking we're gonna be above $250 million. $500 million still, you know, still is a ways away. That said, I do think it shows us a path to get to that number in, you know, in, it's certainly within the range of what we talked about. If we can get there a year earlier, wow, that would be great. But, but right now, we're quite frankly focused on Q4 of 2023, as you can imagine. So, so I don't want to get too far ahead of ourselves. I'm sorry, All right, great. I'll check- Joe, remind me, remind me the first part of the question again, because I think that was Alan's question. Yeah, no, it was more just if you're planning to rely more so on partners, given the fact that you're reducing headcount in sales and marketing. Yes. I don't think we're depending any more on partners as a result of reducing headcount, but we are emphasizing the importance of partner engagement with our account teams. So you know, partners are really critical, but it's not like we're gonna have to replace the changes we've made. A lot of the changes we made, frankly, were simplification of some of the management structures and, you know, reducing the number of parallel organizations that, candidly, one of our clients would have to deal with, as well as internally, that we're creating silos. And I'm feeling really good about what we're able to do. Great. Then just as a follow-up around GenAI. Some of the customers we've spoken to over the last, you know, three or four months, have noted that, you know, they don't even really know how GenAI can be applied to their businesses yet. So they don't feel that they're really in a position to make a purchase. So I'm just curious if, you know, you're seeing somewhat of, like, a pause here in terms of, you know, actually signing contracts, and if that means that this could be a little bit more accretive to 2024 than maybe 2023. Do you think that you'll have any case studies by, say, the next Investor Day next year around, you know, this customer saw, you know, X savings from our GenAI solution? Just curious if you think things will be that far down the road by then? Yeah, I'm quite confident, we will have case studies for next PegaWorld. I think we could even start drafting them in Q1, so like they'll be waiting for Q2. The one of the things I said was that I think a lot of clients are experimenting because they're not entirely sure where, how they should use it, and if there are risks, if there aren't risks. But when you take a look at, for example, if you do the GenAI demo I talked about, you'll see the clients see that, and they say, "Oh, my God, I've got a whole new way to think about my reengineering and transformation process. I can actually use a lot of collective wisdom to bring me best practices that at least stimulate my thinking." And I think it's an example of very practical, and everyone who sees that says, "Wow." So, well, see what you say. Great. Thank you, guys. Our next question comes from Fred Havemeyer with Macquarie. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning, Alan. Good morning, Ken. Wanted to ask on... I'm sorry if I'm beating a dead horse here, a generative AI-related topic. Primarily, I'm curious here, are you seeing any sort of change in priorities among your partners, where they're investing or allocating into their practices, as we've seen code and copilots, become more robust and become more, more productionized? So first of all, I would like to counsel you to not casually use horse metaphors. We never talk about dead horses at Pega. Right? Or leading them to water or any of that, any of those sorts of things. But having said that, I think- Look, look for more- Yeah, I know. Keep it, keep it clean. That's all I'd say, Fred. But, and the horse is flying strong, so don't worry about that. The, the partners are trying to figure it out, too. You know, there's a, a sense of an enormous opportunity, but boy, is this going to massively change how, a lot of partners end up delivering their projects. It's gonna be, it's gonna be very, very large. And so I think that by, hooking up with the partners on an innovation agenda, which is what we're working with, and being able to use and show them some of the tooling we have, like the demo, we're able to get them excited about how they could reorient some of their efforts. Because, frankly, we're, we're in a period of a lot of discovery going on. There's no question in my mind that this is extremely real, but there's also no question that the hype has outpaced some of the short-term tangible benefits, and everybody kind of knows that and is figuring it out. But boy, this is gonna so radically change our technology as we go through 2024. It's actually enormously exciting. Thank you. Our next question comes from Blair Abernethy with Rosenblatt Security. Please go ahead. Excuse me, Blair. You may go ahead. Sorry. Thanks for squeezing me in, guys. Ken, could you just comment on the renewal environment, given the consistent weakness in the macro or difficulty in the macro, just how did renewals trend in Q3, and what should we be expecting in Q4? We haven't seen any noticeable change in the likelihood of a client you know continuing to stay and invest and even grow in the applications that they have with Pega. So I mean, naturally, we you know do have clients that you know decide to go a different direction. We do have clients that have transformational changes in their business, and unfortunately, Pega may not be part of that. That does happen. You know, which just happens to every software company, but it's not something that there's been a noticeable change in 2023. Yeah. When I make comments about the macro environment, none of them are related to the renewal environment. Our customers, really, we're fortunate in the sector, the client base that we've really been focusing on are not these SMB-type businesses that are more likely to try to squeeze out their vendors. Our customers are trying to squeeze out benefit. It's normally, when we talk about the sales cycles, Blair, for anyone else still listening, it's really focused on net new workloads, is where you... Existing applications, existing projects are not, you know, they might be leaning more into trying to push volume to automate. Okay, great. Thank you. And, just, Alan, just following on your, commentary at the beginning in your prepared remarks, about the AI risks, can you maybe just expand on that a little bit? But you've had, you know, Infinity 23 has been in the market for a month or so here, but just, you know, what sort of, given the nature of your banks and insurance customers, what are they looking for in terms of managing these risks? And, is that, you know, is it, scalable, I guess, when I look at, look at the, the issues from a, from a, you know, from a, from a risk perspective? Well, I think we have a really good understanding of that, and I'll just tick off a couple of places that we're really working. One is to give the right people a chance to curate the output from AI before it actually gets used in a way that might be unpredictable. And we show examples of that in what we've already released. And for everything that we're going to be building over the next two releases in 2024, you're going to see more and more of that. The second is we understand how to really eliminate those hallucinations, and being able to use both our best practices and client best practices to take the power of generative AI, but to make it so it operates in a very constrained, you know, controlled fashion. I'm not sure that everybody understands how to do that, but we definitely do, and that's a lot of what we're working on, making sure we're building in, so that those knobs and dials are firmly in the client's hands. And the third is, and we've talked about this for two years, the whole ethical AI and bias checking capability that we have around our statistical AI. I think a lot of people, with the excitement about generative AI, should not forget the importance of statistical AI, which, for example, comes from our decisioning and our process AI capabilities, and those are also super important. Those need different controls than generative AI, and, we've got—we've already got tremendous things there as well. That's great. Thank you. Our next question comes from Austin Cole with Citizen JMP Securities. Please go ahead. Great. Thanks for taking my question. Just really quick, I've been looking at the AI demo that you mentioned. Where do you see this technology in three to five years and what it's doing for clients and adding value? Thank you. Yeah. So what it's going to do, actually, well before three years, is it's going to make it possible for us to take the knowledge of the Internet, the client's best practices as they've identified and documented it, the Pega best practices as our experts have drawn on our experience with multiple clients, and the information in their Pega system themselves, so that they're able to use their own information and configurations and put those things together in a way that is candidly completely different than you would have to approach this a year ago. So it's, it's going to really drive a much, much greater iteration in how clients operate with their customers, and it's really going to help customers build for change, which, of course, is our brand promise. Great. Thank you so much. With that... So thank you. And let me thank everyone. We've run a few minutes over here. We're very excited about both where we are and what we're going to be able to do going forward, and I look forward to talking to all of you very soon. Thank you very much. This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation, and have a great day.