Slides
Page 1
& PepGen ™ Company Presentation August 2026 H₂N
Page 2
2 Forward-Looking Statements This presentation contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. These statements may be identified by words such as “aims,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “could,” “estimates,” “expects,” “forecasts,” “goal,” “intends,” “may,” “plans,” “possible,” “potential,” “seeks,” “will,” and variations of these words or similar expressions that are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Any such statements in this presentation that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward- looking statements. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements regarding the potential of our EDO platform to deliver high levels of oligonucleotide to the nuclei, the promising trends and therapeutic potential and safety profile of PGN-EDODM1 based on data from the 5, 10 and 15 mg/kg cohorts of the FREEDOM study and 5 mg/kg cohort of the FREEDOM2 study, our expectations regarding the potential for significant correction of mis-splicing with more and higher doses of PGN-EDODM1 over a longer treatment period to potentially provide improved functional benefit for patients with DM1, the design, initiation and conduct of clinical trials, including expected timelines for data readouts from our FREEDOM2 and OLE trials, the potential for any functional improvements that may result from robust splicing correction with PGN-EDODM1, dose-dependent increases in splicing suggesting that PGN- EDODM1 is getting into the muscle and effectively binding to the target, the potential for PGN-EDODM1 to offer a best-in-class treatment option, ongoing and planned regulatory interactions and our financial resources and expected cash runway. Any forward-looking statements in this presentation are based on current expectations, estimates and projections only as of the date of this presentation and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially and adversely from those set forth in or implied by such forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: delays or failure to successfully initiate or complete our ongoing and planned development activities for our product candidates, including PGN-EDODM1; our ability to enroll patients in our clinical trials, including FREEDOM2, that our interpretation of clinical and preclinical study results may be incorrect, or that we may not observe the levels of therapeutic activity in clinical testing that we anticipate based on prior clinical or preclinical results, including for PGN-EDODM1; our product candidates, including PGN-EDODM1, may not be safe and effective or otherwise demonstrate safety and efficacy in our clinical trials; adverse outcomes from our regulatory interactions, including delays in regulatory review, clearance to proceed or approval by regulatory authorities with respect to our programs, including clearance to commence planned clinical studies of our product candidates, including release of the partial clinical hold placed by FDA on the FREEDOM2 study, or other regulatory feedback requiring modifications to our development programs, including with respect to the FREEDOM2 program; changes in regulatory framework that are out of our control; our ability to obtain, maintain and protect our intellectual property; our ability to enforce our patents against infringers and defend our patent portfolio against challenges from third parties; competition from others developing therapies for the indications we are pursuing; unexpected increases in the expenses associated with our development activities or other events that adversely impact our financial resources and cash runway; and our dependence on third parties for some or all aspects of our product manufacturing, research and preclinical and clinical testing. Additional risks concerning PepGen's programs and operations are described in our most recent filings with the SEC. PepGen explicitly disclaims any obligation to update any forward-looking statements except to the extent required by law. This presentation discusses PGN-EDODM1, an investigational therapy, that has not been approved for use in any country, and is not intended to convey conclusions about their efficacy or safety. There is no guarantee that PGN-EDODM1 or any other investigational therapy will successfully complete clinical development or gain regulatory authority approval.
Page 3
Leveraging EDO Platform to Drive Meaningful Impact for Patients PGN-EDODM1: Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 3 • Best-in-class potential; selectively targets only pathogenic DMPK RNA • Favorable emerging safety profile and FREEDOM2 5 mg/kg results supportive of the ongoing dosing in 10 mg/kg MAD cohort • FREEDOM2 cleared in South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand; enrollment open and active in Canada, UK, and South Korea • Orphan Drug & Fast Track Designation (U.S.); Orphan Designation (EU) • Developing research pipeline that applies platform differentiators to address underlying neuromuscular disease drivers • Exploring EDO's potential in genetic conditions, including Charcot- Marie-Tooth disease Research Pipeline EDO PLATFORM Achieving superior nuclear delivery and uptake of therapeutic oligonucleotides, overcoming key limitations of prior approaches Backed by a team of leading neuromuscular researchers with deep expertise in genetic disease biology and oligonucleotide drug development Develop therapies that address the root cause of serious genetic neuromuscular and neurological diseases—driving meaningful, functional improvement • November: FREEDOM2 10 mg/kg clinical results • Early January: Update from the open-label extension • 1H 2027: FREEDOM2 12.5 mg/kg clinical results Anticipated Upcoming Milestones Strong cash runway into the 4Q 2027 OUR VISION
Page 4
PGN-EDODM1 Delivery to DM1 Patient Myotubes Red = oligo 4 PepGen’s EDO Platform Has Been Designed and Developed to Solve the Delivery Challenge of Oligonucleotides Immortalized myoblasts from a DM1 patient with 2600 CTG repeats were cultured then differentiated for 4 days into myotubes and then treated with fluorescently tagged PGN-PMODM1 (PMO) or PGN-EDODM1 (PPMO) at 10 uM. Cells were visualized by confocal microscopy 24h after treatment. EDO platform results in nuclear delivery of oligonucleotide therapeutics
Page 5
1 5 10 20 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 Concentration (nmol) Nuclear uptake (pmol) 55x 98x 73x PMO Delivery in DM1 Cells 5 EDO Technology Can Improve Endosomal Escape and Has Been Shown to Increase Nuclear Uptake up to 98-Fold NUCLEAR UPTAKE Immortalized myoblasts from a healthy individual or a DM1 patient with 2600 CTG repeats were cultured then differentiated for 4 days into myotubes and then treated with fluorescently tagged PGN-PMODM1 (PMO) or PGN-EDODM1 (PPMO) at concentrations detailed above. Cells were visualized by confocal microscopy 24h after treatment. Graphs are presented as mean ± SD.
Page 6
61. FREEDOM 15 mg/kg data readout when compared with prior published data. Differentiated Delivery Technology • Receptor-independent EDO peptide delivery • Designed to escape the endosome – unlike TfnR targeting 1 Differentiated Target • Selectively targets pathogenic RNA (CUG repeat in DMPK) • Demonstrated highest rate of splicing correction ever reported in DM1 after a single dose1 2 Cost Effective Manufacturing • EDO peptide is a short linear peptide – not cell culture product 3 PGN-EDODM1: A Differentiated Drug with Best-in-Class Potential
Page 7
PGN-EDODM1 – Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 (DM1)
Page 8
8 Myotonic Dystrophy Type 1 Overview and Unmet Medical Need Sources: Neuroepidemiology (2022) 56 (3): 163–173., Neurology 2021 Feb 16;96(7):e1045-e1053 CUG: cytosine-uracil-guanine; DMPK: dystrophia myotonica protein kinase Jubal, retired professor living with DM1 • Caused by CTG expansion in the DMPK gene, resulting in pathogenic DMPK transcripts driving disease pathology • More than 110,000 patients affected in the U.S. and EU • Symptoms can develop from childhood through adulthood, with significant variability in disease presentation and progression • Average life expectancy is 50–60 years in patients with non-congenital DM1 • No approved therapies currently address the underlying cause of the disease DM1 Overview
Page 9
Cardiovascular: cardiac conduction issues Reproductive: low testosterone, gynecological problems CNS: fatigue, daytime sleepiness, difficulty concentrating, hypersomnia, learning difficulties Muscle: myotonia, weakness, wasting, myalgia, facial myopathy, balance issues Respiratory: sleep apnea, lung infections Speech and Swallowing: dysphagia, aspiration, dysarthria Gastrointestinal: constipation, diarrhea, abdominal pain Other: eyes (cataracts), skin, bones, increased cancer risk Source: Christopher Project Reference Group. The myotonic dystrophy experience: a North American cross-sectional study. Muscle Nerve. 2019;59(4):457-464. doi:10.1002/mus.26420. 9 DM1's Broad, Multisystemic Symptoms Underscore the Need for a Disease-Modifying Therapy DM1 SYMPTOMS Impact on Daily Living Mobility, ability to tend to household and personal needs, executive function and memory, communication, and socialization.
Page 10
10 PGN-EDODM1 Blocking Approach Targets the Pathogenic CUGexp Repeats DMPK RNA Wojciechowska, et al., Quantitative Methods to Monitor RNA Biomarkers in Myotonic Dystrophy, Nature, April 12, 2018 DM1 is caused by pathogenic DMPK transcripts PGN-EDODM1 binds selectively to the pathogenic DMPK transcript Bound MBNL1 (inactive) DMPK transcript Free MBNL1 (active) PGN-EDODM1 • PGN-EDODM1 binds selectively to the pathogenic DMPK transcript • This reduces the ability of the CUGexp repeats to form hairpin loops and sequester RNA splicing proteins • DM1 is caused by pathogenic DMPK transcripts containing CUGexp repeat sequences that form hairpin loops • These hairpin loops trap MBNL1 proteins that are needed for correct splicing of mRNAs Trapped MBNL1 is inactive and results in mis-splicing Liberated MBNL1 restores correct splicing
Page 11
MBNL1 LiberationFoci Reduction 11 PGN-EDODM1 Reduced Pathogenic Nuclear Foci, Liberated MBNL1 and Corrected Mis-Splicing in Patient Cells with Long CUG Repeats Immortalized myoblasts from healthy individual or DM1 patient with 2600 CTG repeats were cultured then differentiated for 4 days into myotubes. Treatment with peptide-PMO conjugates at concentrations given. Cells were harvested for analysis 24h after treatment. RNA isolation, RT-PCR and capillary electrophoresis (QIAxcel) analysis were performed. Visualization with FISH and immunofluorescence microscopy. Mean ± SD; n = 5 per group. Not Treated PGN-EDODM1 Treated Not Treated PGN-EDODM1 Treated 54% reduction in toxic foci Across multiple transcripts Mis-Splicing Correction 69% correction
Page 12
12 Multiple Doses of PGN-EDODM1 Led to Greater Improvement in Splicing Correction and Myotonia vs Single Dose in Preclinical Studies Protocol: HSALR mice received 1 or 4 doses of PGN-EDODM1, with 4-week intervals between doses. Skeletal muscle tissues were collected 4 weeks post-final dose. Skeletal muscle tissue concentration was measured by fluorescent based HPLC method. Graph is presented as mean ± SD; n = 8-12 per cohort. Mis-splicing analysis considers multiple transcripts. Graph is presented as mean ± SD; n = 8-12 per cohort per transcript. Action myotonia evaluation (pinch test) was performed 4 weeks post-final dose. Grade 3 = Clear sign of myotonia strong AND reproducible, Grade 2 = Clear sign of myotonia, strong OR reproducible, Grade 1 = Clear sign of myotonia but non reproducible, Grade 0 = No sign of myotonia. Graphs are presented as mean ± SD; n = 12-43 per cohort. Skeletal muscle Tissue Concentration Across multiple transcripts Mis-Splicing Correction Correction of Myotonia Pinch test 56 120 0 68% 99% 0% 76% 99% Correction of myotonia
Page 13
PGN-EDODM1 – FREEDOM SAD Trial in DM1
Page 14
14 FREEDOM: Phase 1 PGN-EDODM1 Single-Ascending Dose Study Design DSMB: data safety monitoring board; IV: intravenous; PBO: placebo; SAD: single-ascending dose; PK: pharmacokinetics PGN-EDODM1 dose Multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled SAD study in patients Single IV administration of PGN-EDODM1 Muscle biopsies in tibialis anterior at Baseline, Day 28, Week 16 Safety, PK, correction of mis- splicing, initial functional assessments Single Dose PGN-EDODM1 or Placebo (randomized 3:1) 15 mg/kg or PBO Baseline DSMB Wk 16D28 Biopsy Biopsy Biopsy 10 mg/kg or PBO Baseline DSMB Wk 16D28 Biopsy Biopsy Biopsy Dosedn=8 n=8 5 mg/kg or PBO Baseline DSMB Wk 16D28 Biopsy Biopsy Biopsy n=8 FREEDOM SAD
Page 15
15 PGN-EDODM1 Produced Dose-Dependent Best-in-Class Splicing Correction Following Single Dose Splicing Index Changes: 22-Gene Panel* at D28 Improvement -53.7% -29.1% 3.3% -12.3% 87.5% of participants across all doses showed improved splicing % Mean change from baseline Placebo1 (n=5) 5 mg/kg (n=6) 10 mg/kg2 (n=4) 15 mg/kg3 (n=6) 1.Missing samples due to unavailability of biopsy tissue or sample outside of assay window. 2. One subject at 10 mg/kg biopsy was not collected at day 28 due to pseudoaneurysm in connection with biopsy and one participant’s splicing index fell below the pre-specified assay range at baseline and at day 28 (indicating no detectable mis-splicing) 3.One subject at 15mg/kg received 77% of the dose and was still included in the splicing index change analysis for the cohort *Provenzano et al., The Splice Index as a prognostic biomarker of strength and function in myotonic dystrophy type 1,J Clin. Inv est. 2025 FREEDOM SAD
Page 16
Natural History Data in Untreated DM1 Patients* 16 +70% +50% >20% Worse Splicing Worsens (% Change from Baseline) ~15% OF UNTREATED PATIENTS > +70% OUTLIER occurs in <2.6% of cases in natural history +20% 0% −20% −50% −70% Splicing Improves (% Change from Baseline) ~74% OF UNTREATED PATIENTS ~11% OF UNTREATED PATIENTS Worsening Improvement ±20% Splicing Midrange >20% Correction Majority of untreated patients demonstrate ±20% splicing change from baseline over 2-3 months Few untreated patients demonstrate >20% splicing change from baseline over 2-3 months *Data from C Thornton et al., Lancet Neurology 2023; 22: 218–28. Supplement ~11% of Untreated DM1 Patients Demonstrate >20% Splicing Improvement over a 2 to 3 Month Time Period Natural History
Page 17
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 Splice Index (% change from baseline) PBO SAD 5 mg/kg SAD 10 mg/kg SAD 15 mg/kg 17 1.Missing samples due to unavailability of biopsy tissue or sample outside of assay window 2.One subject at 10 mg/kg biopsy was not collected at day 28 due to pseudoaneurysm in connection with biopsy and one participant ’s splicing index fell below the pre- specified assay range at baseline and at day 28 (indicating no detectable mis-splicing) 3.One subject at 15mg/kg received 77% of the dose and was still included in the splicing index change analysis for the cohort 4. Day 28 analysis from FREEDOM-DM1 clinical study Higher PGN-EDODM1 Doses Associated with Increased Number of Patients Achieving >20% Splicing Improvement4 Placebo1 5 mg/kg SAD 10 mg/kg SAD2 ±20% Splicing Midrange >20% Splicing Improvement 15 mg/kg SAD3 >20% Splicing Worsening FREEDOM SAD
Page 18
18 PGN-EDODM1 Demonstrated >20% Splicing Correction in a Majority of DM1 Patients after a Single Dose ≥10 mg/kg Splicing Improves (% Change from Baseline) >20% Correction ±20% Splicing Midrange 74% of Untreated Patients +20% 0% −20% −50% −70% Worsening Improvement Placebo SAD: 20% Pts >20% +3.3% Mean Splicing N=5 5 mg/kg SAD: 17% Pts >20% -12.3% Mean Splicing N=6 10 mg/kg SAD: 50% Pts >20% -29.1% Mean Splicing N=4 15 mg/kg SAD: 83% Pts >20% -53.7% Mean Splicing N=6 FREEDOM SAD
Page 19
191.Missing samples due to unavailability of biopsy tissue 2.One subject at 15mg/kg received 77% of the dose and was still included in the muscle tissue concentration analysis for the cohort * Robust, Greater Than Dose-Proportional Increase in Muscle Tissue Concentration Following Single Dose 5mg/kg 10mg/kg 15mg/kg 0 100 200 300 160.6 44.1 13.7 Mean TA muscle Concentration (ng/g) 5 mg/kg (n=6) 10 mg/kg1 (n=5) 15 mg/kg1,2 (n=5) Concentration (ng/g) Mean ± SE 160.6 44.1 13.7 Muscle Tissue Concentration at D28 Mean TA Muscle FREEDOM SAD
Page 20
20 PGN-EDODM1 Was Generally Well Tolerated, with TEAEs Primarily Mild to Moderate Across Dose Cohorts *As of database lock on December 23, 2025. Unblinded FREEDOM safety data TEAE: treatment-emergent adverse event, SAE: serious adverse event, DLT: Dose limiting toxicity, eGFR(cys): estimated glomerular filtration rate (cystatin equation) Placebo (n=6) N (events) Cohort 1 5 mg/kg (n=6) Cohort 2 10 mg/kg (n=6) Cohort 3 15 mg/kg (n=6) Total (n=24) Any TEAE, n (events) 5 (16) 3 (20) 4 (16) 5 (18) 17 ( 70) Any TEAE by Max Severity Mild/Moderate Severe 5 0 2 1 2 2 5 0 14 3 Any related TEAE, n (events) 1 (3) 1 (1) 2 (4) 4 (14) 8 ( 22) Any SAE (event) 1(2) 1 (1) 2 (2) 0 (0) 4 (5) Any related SAE 0 0 1 (1) 0 1(1) Any TEAE leading to study withdrawal 0 0 0 0 0 Any TEAE leading to death 0 0 0 0 0 • Most frequent TEAEs: nausea, nasopharyngitis, and headache • No electrolyte-related TEAEs or hypomagnesemia observed across dose cohorts • No renal-related TEAEs observed at 5 and 10 mg/kg; DLT at 15 mg/kg involving a transient decrease in eGFR(cys), resolving without intervention • Transient moderate albuminuria observed at 15 mg/kg and mild albuminuria at 10 mg/kg; Normalized within 2-7 days without intervention • One drug-related hypersensitivity reaction (rash) during infusion at 15 mg/kg, resolving within 2 hours with oral antihistamines • One drug-related SAE of severe abdominal pain at 10 mg/kg, confounded by off-label medication use on the day of dosing FREEDOM SAD
Page 21
PGN-EDODM1 – FREEDOM2 MAD Trial in DM1
Page 22
FREEDOM2: Phase 2 MAD Study Design DSMB: data safety monitoring board; FU: follow-up; IV: intravenous; MAD: multiple-ascending dose; PBO: placebo; PK: pharmacokinetics; vHOT: video hand opening test; OLE: open label extension; 10MWT: 10-meter walk run test *The U.S. FDA placed a partial clinical hold on FREEDOM2-DM1 Multinational, randomized, double- blind, placebo-controlled, MAD study open in Canada, UK, NZ, Australia and South Korea* IV administration of PGN-EDODM1 or placebo every 4 weeks for a period of 12 weeks FREEDOM-OLE open for patients in FREEDOM & FREEDOM2 Complete Key endpoints: Safety, PK, correction of splicing, functional assessments: vHOT, hand grip,10MWT Fully Enrolled Biopsy Biopsy5 mg/kg or PBO n=8 DSMB Safety FU PGN-EDODM1 dose 7d post final dose Safety FU Biopsy Biopsy10 mg/kg or PBO n=8 DSMB 7d post final dose Safety FU Biopsy Biopsy12.5 mg/kg or PBO n=8 DSMB 7d post final dose 22 FREEDOM2 MAD 4 Doses of PGN-EDODM1 or Placebo (randomized 3:1) Recruiting
Page 23
Any TEAE 7 (87.5) Mild Moderate Severe 4 (50.0) 3 (37.5) 0 (0.0) Any SAE 0 Any related SAE 0 Any AESI or dose-limiting toxicities 0 Any TEAE leading to study withdrawal 0 Any TEAE leading to death 0 23 Favorable Emerging Safety Profile of PGN-EDODM1; No Increase in Toxicity with Multiple Doses at 5 mg/kg Summary of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)1 1. Data cutoff date: 04 March 2026 AE: Adverse event; AESI: Adverse event of special interest; DLT: Dose limiting toxicities; SAE: Serious adverse event; TEAE: Treatment emergent adverse event; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate 5 mg/kg (n=8) n(%) PGN-EDODM1 was Generally Well-Tolerated, with All AEs Mild or Moderate in Severity1 • All participants completed all 4 doses, with no evidence of cumulative AEs • The overall AE profile of MAD 5 mg/kg is consistent with that observed in SAD 5 mg/kg • Nausea was the most common AE • No SAEs, AESIs, or DLTs and no signs of hypersensitivity • eGFR and creatinine measurements within the normal range • No hypomagnesemia • Transient albuminuria observed – did not increase with repeat dosing FREEDOM2 MAD
Page 24
FREEDOM2 5 mg/kg Splicing Correction 24Data cutoff date: 04 March 2026 *One patient’s muscle tissue concentration reading was pending at cutoff date. Placebo 5mg/kg Wk13 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 -7.3-6.8 FREEDOM2 5mg/kg Mean splicing data Splice index (Mean % change from baseline ± SE) n=2 n=6 Splicing Analysis -7.3 5 mg/kg Collective Splicing Data Excluding notable splicing outlier mean splicing correction of 22.9% (n=5) Improvement FREEDOM2 MAD Pbo2 Pbo1 P1 P3 P4 P6 P5 P2 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 -55.8 -39.1 -16.2 -3.1-0.1 70.8 -27.2 13.5 FREEDOM2- 5mg/kg Individual Splicing data Splice index % change from baseline) 5 mg/kg Individual Splicing Data Improvement High mean muscle tissue concentration of PGN-EDODM1 of 158 ng/g at Day 7 post-dose (n=5)*
Page 25
25 FREEDOM2 5 mg/kg Myotonia (vHOT): PGN-EDODM1 Shows Promising Middle Finger vHOT Trends at Lowest Dose BL W4 W8 W12 W13 W16 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 Placebo 5 mg/kg (n=6) Improvement CFB: Change from baseline; SE: Standard error Data cutoff date: 04 March 2026 +2.5s (52% CFB) -2.95s (23% CFB) vHOT Analysis FREEDOM2 MAD • Excluding notable splicing outlier, the active group remained below baseline (n=5) • Splicing outlier demonstrated 22 sec difference between nadir and week 16
Page 26
26 FREEDOM2 MAD at 10 & 12.5 mg/kg has Potential to Build Upon Robust Single-Dose Splicing Correction Splicing Improves (% Change from Baseline) >20% Correction ±20% Splicing Midrange 74% of Untreated Patients +20% 0% −20% −50% −70% Worsening Improvement Placebo MAD: -6.8% Mean Splicing N=2 Placebo SAD 5 mg/kg SAD 10 mg/kg SAD 15 mg/kg SAD 5 mg/kg MAD: -7.3% Mean Splicing N=6 5 mg/kg MAD: -22.9% Mean Splicing N=5 without outlier Future Data Readouts: FREEDOM2 MAD at 10 & 12.5 mg/kg FREEDOM SAD FREEDOM2 MAD
Page 27
27 Promising Safety, Splicing and vHOT Data in FREEDOM2 Lowest Dose – Supports Ongoing 10 mg/kg MAD Cohort Data cutoff date: 04 March 2026 AE: Adverse event; SAE: Serious adverse event Company on track to report clinical data from 10 mg/kg multiple dose cohort in November • PGN-EDODM1 was generally well-tolerated; all AEs were mild or moderate in severity, with no SAEs or cumulative toxicity with repeat dosing observed SAFETY & TOLERABILITY SPLICING & FUNCTIONAL DATA: • Mean splicing correction of 7.3% with PGN-EDODM1 (n=6) vs 6.8% placebo (n=2) • Analysis excluding one notable splicing outlier demonstrated mean splicing correction of 22.9% (n=5) • Promising trends observed in vHOT in PGN-EDODM1 treated group FREEDOM2 MAD
Page 28
28 Summary of PGN-EDODM1 and FREEDOM Program • Completed enrollment in the 10 mg/kg MAD cohort of FREEDOM2, with 7 of 8 patients having completed dosing • 16 patients have enrolled in the FREEDOM-OLE at 5 mg/kg, including 6 patients from FREEDOM2; OLE now dosing at 10 mg/kg • November: FREEDOM2 10 mg/kg clinical results • Early January: Update from the open-label extension • 1H 2027: FREEDOM2 12.5 mg/kg clinical results • EOP2 meeting with regulators anticipated pending results ofthe 10 mg/kg and 12.5 mg/kg cohort to discuss the registrational program Strong cash runway into the fourth quarter of 2027 PHASE 2 FREEDOM2 MAD & OLE Favorable emerging safety profile Unprecedented splicing correction achieved with single dose FREEDOM STUDY: EXPLORATORY: PD (SPLICING) PRIMARY: SAFETY Differentiated Delivery Technology 1 Differentiated Target 2 Promising Safety, Splicing and vHOT Data in FREEDOM2 Lowest Dose – Supports Ongoing 10 mg/kg MAD Cohort GUIDANCE:
Page 29
Thank you