Good day, and welcome to the Premier Financial Corp third quarter 2021 earnings conference call. All participants will be in a listen-only mode. Should you need assistance, please signal a conference specialist by pressing the star key followed by zero. After today's presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Please note this event is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Paul Nungester, CFO. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you, Chuck. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for today's third quarter 2021 earnings conference call. This call is also being webcast, and the audio replay will be available at the Premier Financial Corp website at premierfincorp.com. Following our prepared comments on the company's strategy and performance, we will be available to take your questions. Before we begin, I'd like to remind you that during the conference call today, including during the question and answer period, you may hear forward-looking statements related to future financial results and business operations for Premier Financial Corp. Actual results may differ materially from current management forecasts and projections as a result of factors over which the company has no control. Information on these risk factors and additional information on forward-looking statements are included in the news release and in the company's reports on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Now I'll turn the call over to Gary for his comments. Thank you, Paul, and good morning to all. We appreciate you joining us today. I'll start off by stating that macroeconomic indicators across our market continue to be positive. Order boards are in good shape for our clients, and supply chain issues are not proving to be overwhelming or at least unsolvable for the majority of the folks we do business with. We maintain a very positive outlook, only tempered by the typical uncertainties coming out of Washington, lingering COVID impacts, and a tough employment environment. The spike in current costs are certainly real, but not a detriment to business at this point. We at Premier are pleased with our third quarter performance, and we had many strengths that were reflected in the numbers for the quarter. We reported $28.4 million net income, $0.76 per share, which for us, from our perspective, gave us a strong 1.49% return on assets and 16.7% return on tangible capital. We'll be fine with each of those numbers. Strong pre-tax, pre-provision return at 1.91% return on assets as well. We had solid core loan growth north of 5%. Our core margin was up 7 basis points, and we returned to our more typical residential mortgage contribution for the quarter as we telegraphed on our last quarter's earnings call. Commercial activity is very robust. New business booked for the quarter and the commercial loan pipeline each remained very strong. The existing commercial line drawdown rate saw slight improvement versus the second quarter, but it remains well off normal levels. Expenses for the quarter were a bit higher than expectation, driven by healthcare benefit costs. We are self-insured, so we feel the impact of cyclicality and any high-impact incidences as incurred, and it makes for more uneven figures from quarter to quarter. No trends should be inferred from Q3's numbers. The loan portfolio as a whole continues to perform well. Low delinquencies continued to experience low NPLs in general. However, during the quarter, we did move a single relationship to non-accrual status, returning our non-performing stats back to a range that we experienced at the end of 2020. The relationship had moved to classified status earlier in this year. Our portfolio quality indicators remained strong and were in familiar and very manageable territory. This particular relationship is current, and it did not participate in COVID deferral programs that were available over the last eighteen months. They face challenges due to an interruption of business on significant government contracts that remain affected by COVID-related policy decisions. Matt Garrity will touch on this more in his comments. At this point, I'll turn it back over to Paul to cover a few more performance details. Thank you, Gary. I'll review our third quarter and year-to-date results. Beginning with the balance sheet, deposits were down less than one percentage point to point as customers have begun using funds with the end of stimulus programs. The mix also declined as businesses continued using liquidity, but we still managed to reduce our all-in cost of funds, which dropped another 2 basis points to 0.24% this quarter, largely due to further reducing our total deposit costs down to only 20 basis points. For assets, we generated over $64 million of core loan growth or 5.1% annualized this quarter, led by commercial, which Matt will discuss shortly. In addition, we are very pleased by our NIM expansion, which rose 4 basis points on a reported basis or 7 basis points to 3.27% when excluding PPP and purchase accounting mark amortization. Next is the allowance, which increased $1.8 million due to a provision expense for loans of $1.6 million and net recoveries of $256,000. This increase is primarily related to an increase in specific reserves for one commercial relationship that turned non-performing during the quarter, plus growth in non-PPP balances, but then mostly offset by further improvement in economic forecasts and a lack of charge-offs. At September 30, our allowance coverage, excluding PPP loans and including acquisition marks, was 1.57%, flat from June 30, but still not back to pre-pandemic levels yet. Which were 1.21% under CECL, pre-pandemic and excluding marks from the UCFC merger. Finishing the balance sheet is capital, where we ended 3Q with over $1 billion of equity, with the quarterly increase primarily due to net earnings in excess of dividends. We also completed about 206,000 of share buybacks for $6 million in the quarter. At September 30, our tangible equity ratio was 9.9%, excluding PPP loans, and total risk-based capital was about 13.7%. Next, I'll turn to the income statement, starting with net interest income of $57 million, which is up 1% on a linked-quarter basis. Excluding the impact of marks and PPP, our net interest margin was 3.27%, up from 3.20% in the second quarter. This is consistent with or slightly better than our expectations, driven by the rebound in loan growth, plus having a full quarter benefit of a swap we executed in the middle of 2Q. We expect NIM to generally remain at this level and hopefully continue to tick up slightly as loan growth continues. Non-interest income was $18.3 million for 3Q, which is up from prior quarter but down from prior year, primarily due to mortgage banking. Mortgage gains were $5.4 million in 3Q, which is up $2.7 million from 2Q, but down $8.5 million from third quarter 2020. As discussed last quarter, total mortgage production continues to meet expectations, and the increase from last quarter was due to our expected improvement in saleable mix. Additionally, we saw a slight rise in the 10-year, which increased from 1.45% at June 30 to 1.52% at September 30. We had a $0.8 million gain in the MSR valuation after the $0.5 million loss in 2Q when the 10-year dropped. Overall, we had a $4 million improvement in mortgage banking on a linked-quarter basis, but much of that was offset by some declines in other lines of business, including insurance and wealth, plus we had that $1.3 million non-recurring item in other income last quarter. Next is expenses, which were up to $39 million, 1.7% on a linked-quarter basis. As mentioned last quarter, we began addressing run rate items starting in the latter half of 2Q, which continued to help in 3Q. There are also some items like costs related to ATM and debit card usage that have benefits up in revenues, as seen by the strong performance in service fees. However, this quarter, we again saw a spike in medical benefit costs similar to what we experienced in the first quarter, which led to the overall increase in expenses for this quarter. Given this trend, we now estimate full year expenses to possibly end higher than previously expected, or around $155 million. Our year-to-date efficiency ratio is now slightly above 50% at 50.5% and could potentially be around that level for the full year. Separately, our third quarter pre-tax, pre-provision income was over $37 million, which again led to a strong 1.9% ROA for Q3 and 2.1% year to date. Bottom line, we reported net income of $28 million or $0.76 per share for Q3 2021, which is generally consistent with our expectations due to the good guidance and provision in NIM, offset partly by higher expenses. That completes my financial review, and I'll now turn the call over to Matt for a discussion of lending and credit. Thanks, Paul. I'll be providing an update on our commercial and residential mortgage areas, as well as an update on asset quality. In our commercial business, we were able to achieve balanced growth in the third quarter consistent with second quarter growth levels, while overall loan production activity showed continued momentum. Loan production for the third quarter improved by over 25% compared to the second quarter, driven by continued improvement in the C&I lending category. C&I loan production as a percentage of total loan production was 48.8% in the third quarter. While production mix will vary from quarter to quarter, we are starting to see more consistent performance in the C&I category. In terms of loan growth, when excluding the effects of PPP, commercial balance growth continued at a 4.4% annualized pace in the third quarter. Growth for the quarter was impacted somewhat with the timing of loan payoffs. In addition, we continue to see relatively low levels of line utilization, and we will benefit when more normal levels of utilization return. As we look forward, pipeline levels are at their highest level since the merger with strong activity in all of our markets, and we expect commercial loan growth for the fourth quarter to be more robust than what we have seen the last two quarters. In our residential mortgage business, we were pleased with our improved performance in terms of mortgage banking revenue, with loan production levels remaining solid in a very competitive operating environment. Mortgage banking gain on sale rebounded solidly in the third quarter of 2021 when compared to the prior quarter, as we were able to improve our saleable mix, as Paul mentioned earlier, while maintaining our margin expectations. Looking ahead, we expect the current competitive operating environment to be with us during the fourth quarter and into the first half of 2022. As we have stated on previous calls, we view residential mortgage as a business we will continue to invest in and steadily grow. With respect to asset quality, we saw improvement in several asset quality indicators while non-performing loan levels increased during the third quarter. Criticized and classified loan levels improved by 9.8% and 11.1% respectively when comparing the third quarter of 2021 to the prior quarter, while we experienced another quarter of net recoveries with respect to charge-offs. Non-performing loans increased by approximately $18.6 million in the third quarter, driven primarily by the designation of a previously classified single C&I relationship into non-performing status. While we continue to work with the client, and although the client remains current on their contractual payments, current circumstances warranted the non-performing designation, and we are properly reserved for the credit at this time. As we have discussed on previous calls, we believe any credit challenges we see in the portfolio are going to be more episodic in nature, just as the C&I loan we just mentioned to you. We continue to work with all of our clients to navigate the current economic environment while monitoring our portfolio closely. I'd now like to turn the call back over to Gary Small. Gary? Thank you, Matt. As we look forward to full year performance, given that we only have a few weeks to go, I'll limit my comments to a few items. As Matt noted, loan balances for the fourth quarter will continue to be strong, particularly on the commercial side. Residential mortgage activity enters into what we would think of as a seasonal period in a typical year in Q4, at least versus Q2 and Q3, business levels. For Q4, the volume is good. Pricing obviously remains very competitive. If I were working the model, I guess I would expect the total mortgage-related fee income to come in more in the $4 million range than what we experienced in the prior quarter. From an expense standpoint, run rate for Q4, I think we'd guide to 39-ish%. We may experience something better than that, but let's wait and see. From a capital standpoint, I would expect that you all should expect us to continue to be in the market from a repurchase activity perspective. We were fine with the level of activity we had in the third quarter. We would not be disappointed to have more on a per quarter basis going forward. With that, I'll turn it back over to Chuck, and we'll take calls. Thank you. We will now begin the question- and- answer session. To ask a question, you may press star then one on your touch-tone phone. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing the keys. If at any time your question has been addressed and you would like to withdraw your question, please press star then two. At this time, we'll pause momentarily to assemble our roster. The first question will come from Scott Siefers with Piper Sandler. Please go ahead. Morning, guys. Thanks for taking the question. Morning, Scott. First question I wanted to ask was just on the credit that moved to non-accrual. I guess to the extent possible, maybe if you could discuss sort of what changed to make it. I think you said the, you know, circumstances warranted it, which I can totally appreciate. Sort of what changed in your mind to take it from, I think you said criticized to non-accrual. I guess more importantly, just maybe any thoughts you can share on what gives you confidence that the reserve you guys have established is sufficient and any thoughts on will there be sort of an exit strategy for this or will it just sort of work out over time? Sure, Scott, this is Matt. I'll give you a couple of points here and hopefully it touch on your topics. The business is a student loan servicer. I think we've disclosed that previously. As you had noted, we had classified this loan earlier in the year. The business has certainly been impacted by a pause in a government contract as a result of the COVID measures. You know, there was always expectations on when that pause was gonna get lifted during the year. So again, circumstances warranted as the year went on and the circumstances continued to change, that we thought it was prudent during Q3 to move that loan into non-performing status. Not atypical of a lending relationship in terms of how it would migrate. In terms of the reserve, without you know getting into forward-looking type of statements regarding this individual credit, we are comfortable with the reserve levels that we have today. We continue to work with the client and you know we're certainly partnering with the client as they think about next steps and what exit strategies look like. We'll continue to monitor it and continue to work with the client and just stay on top of the details as they evolve. Okay. Perfect. Thank you. Switching gears a little, maybe Paul, when you talked about the margin being flat to up, you're talking about the sort of that core 327- Yeah. ex-PPP NPAs, right? Correct. Yep. Okay, perfect. All right. Thank you. Thank you, Scott. The next question will come from Tim Switzer with KBW. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. I'm on for Mike Perito. Thanks for taking my question. Morning, Tim. I had a follow-up kind of on the core NIM you guys are talking about. You had pretty good expansion this quarter. It looks like it should be able to at least sustain these levels. Could you talk about kind of the primary drivers behind this? It seems like both asset yields and deposit costs are helping. I was just curious on, Well, what the drivers are behind all those. Then it seems like you're expecting even more deposit cost reductions next quarter. Can you talk about where that's coming from? I guess if you're able to quantify maybe how low deposit costs could go, that would be great. Yeah. Yeah, sure thing. The change for this quarter is a combination of a few things. One, we have a full quarter benefit of the swap that we talked about last quarter. We only had a little bit, a lift last quarter, so we got, you know, a couple more bits out of that here, on a quarter-over-quarter basis, which is nice. Two, with loan growth and bringing on those assets at yields better than the existing average yields in the book, including rolling out of the securities that we had been doing earlier in the year before loan growth came back. That helped provide some lift. And then, you're right, we did make some more progress on our cost of funds. Got that down again, primarily on the deposit cost front there. You know, I think we've kind of said it before, we're pretty much at the bottom on those. You know, we keep looking for pockets, and if we find another basis point or two or so out of that book, that'd be great. You know, we've pretty much found what we could on that front, so asset yields should start driving us back up at this point. Okay. That improvement on asset yield is just going to be driven by loan growth, right? Yeah. Could you talk about kind of how loan pricing is? You said they're coming on higher than what's actually on the book right now. Yeah, this is Matt. It's coming on at rates and yields above the NIM. I would say from a pricing perspective, it's always a very, very competitive environment and really in all our businesses, but I would say it's stabilized. I would say it's the rate of decline on the rate side has tended to flatten out a little bit. It's still ultra-competitive and Mm-hmm. It seems like it's flattened out a little bit. Right. Right. I- We're referring overall to either NIM or the average asset yield because we are rolling out of securities now. Mm-hmm. That's part of the lift too. Yeah. By design, we ladder those securities so that we'd be able to exit. Right ... as the loan portfolios picked up. We're swapping, you know, 100 basis points, 80 basis points stuff for true loan yields. Right. Okay. That makes sense. Thank you. Could I ask one real quick on your return of capital? You seem pretty focused on it with the buyback and increasing the dividend as well. With your share price being a little bit higher than when you started the buyback this year, are you price sensitive at all, I guess, this quarter? You know, maybe the share price continues to rally higher. I believe last quarter you guys said you were kind of hoping to glide down to like a 9%-9.25% TCE ratio ex PPP over time. Is that still kind of a good target for you? How quickly would you like to get there? This is Gary. I'll make the general comment in reverse there. Yeah. 9.25% for the way our balance sheet is constructed right now as far as mix feels, would feel very good. I think without PPP, Paul, we're running close to 10%. Yeah. Our projections would say if we don't manage our capital well, that's going to move deep into 10 as we go through 2022. Buybacks have always been a part of the game along with the dividend and keeping capital there for growth and acquisition opportunities. We'll continue to play that balanced game rather than overcommit one direction or the other. I think over the course of this year, we're always price sensitive back to where you started. We wake up that way. But having said that can't overrun our ability to redeploy the capital back to the shareholder or in the shareholder's best interest as long as it's at a reasonable earn back rate. We're cognizant of that, and we're flexible on what those earn back rates need to be in a reasonable way that match what's going on in the market. At the end of the day, we just will not let capital stack up and go underutilized. Got it. All right. Very clear. Thank you. Again, if you have a question, please press star then one. Our next question will come from Feddie Strickland with Janney Montgomery Scott. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning. Morning. Appreciate the color on expenses with respect to the healthcare benefit costs. I was just curious, as you're out there looking to hire new talent, are you seeing incrementally more competition from either a wage perspective or, I guess just what you're having to offer? You know, Feddie, I'd say I call it the $22 and under, entry level or near entry level. There's so much competition for those qualities that those folks have. We might have in the past, go back to pre-COVID, had a bit of an edge relative to benefits, work environment, professionalism of the environment, versus just a regular retail job, wherever it might be. Certainly what we've all experienced across our market and across, I think, a broader set is the fact that jobs that might have rated lower on those qualities in the past are throwing dollars at folks to fill their gap. You do have to be cognizant of that. Having said that, we're not doing wholesale changes across the board to address in any way that would be noteworthy, but we're very cognizant of our upfront. I wouldn't be surprised if we didn't see the industry as a whole, and we'd be included in that, make some small movement relative to P&L impact on the entry-level roles. We really have to find ways to pull the other levers that make us attractive to potential candidates as well. We just can't throw money at it. One of those levers that we're working real hard is our approach on return to office. I don't know that it's wholly unique, but I think we work hard or as hard as any of my peers that I've talked to customize our return to office answers by department, by role, by the impact on customer service, internally and externally in development so that we can offer the very best mix of something that would be appreciated by the individual and still be a good thing for our customers and the shareholder. The easy answer would be everybody back in the office, and we've got competitors that have done that. Everybody back in. We didn't feel like that was reflective of where the world's at and gonna be, and that we would miss the mark on being attractive to new candidates coming down the road. But there are folks out there that are that's their goalpost. I think we're a little closer to the other goalpost. That's just one of the things that you can do as an organization other than just dollars and cents. Got it. Just kind of the intangibles of being a little bit more flexible, is kind of something you can add incrementally, to make you more attractive as an employer, is what you're saying? It's pretty specific. We don't guarantee in this scenario. We let folks know this is all subject to change as the business needs change. You got to be able to flex, so don't plan your life around always being able to have three days away from the office. If it's a job that's well-performed, two days in and three days off, and this is by department, by management group as to how this is evaluated, we will offer that opportunity. It's a little more certain than just flexible. It's not like Friday afternoon off if you like it. It's a little more specific than that. Got it. That makes sense. You actually answered my follow-up, in your answer there. Thanks so much for taking my question. You bet. Good question. Thanks, Feddie. The next question will come from David Long with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Good morning, everyone. Morning, David. Morning, David. I wanted to ask specifically about the utilization rate on the commercial side of things. It sounds like it's picked up a little bit. Did you give any numbers where it stands and where it may have stood on June 30th, and then where were you pre-pandemic? Did you give the actual numbers there? It's today it's in the mid-30s. I'll say it's about 35% utilization today, and we were closer to more of a 50% utilization pre-pandemic. The other thing I would say, we did see an increase in line balance, about $7 million or $8 million for the quarter. Part of that was driven by some of the new C&I origination that I mentioned in my comments. Some new C&I relationships coming on that had lines of credit that got utilized at closing. It's more of that activity than it would have been our existing business just continuing to draw more. It's just not moving a whole heck of a lot right now. It may be moved 2% from Q2. I think we did the math for an earlier call, Matt, and if for those existing relationships, if we return to our normal level, $130 million-$140 million. $135 million. $135 million difference in outstanding. Got it. Okay. You know, when you're talking about the loan growth, you know, decent here in the quarter for, on the commercial side, seems like your pipeline is very good and that number's poised to accelerate. Is that gonna come from the new relationships? Is it with new relationships with your current bankers? Is it have you added people? Is there market disruption that you're taking advantage? What is Premier benefiting from, and how are you driving that growth on the commercial side? Great question. It's really from all of those things. We've mentioned on prior calls, we've been very successful in bringing in some good talent, some good regional bank talent in our markets that come somewhat from the disruption in the industry. If you think about the TCF Huntington transaction, that's been very beneficial for us on the client side, but really on the lender side too. We've seen benefit there. We've seen our existing clients as well, who have been on the sidelines through COVID, but have performed very well, feeling more comfortable in expanding their business and investing in their business and borrowing again. We've seen some of that. But I think the bigger part of it is the talent that we're bringing in and the relationships that they're attracting and bringing into the bank. That's been really beneficial for us. That'll continue. As I mentioned, our pipeline levels are really strong right now, really in all stages and across our markets. We do feel like we're well poised into the fourth quarter on the growth side, but it's momentum that's really gonna kick into 2022 as well. It's got some legs to it. Got it. No, I appreciate the additional color there. Thanks, guys. This concludes our question and answer session. I would like to turn the conference back over to Gary Small for any closing remarks. Please go ahead, sir. Well, I'll just say thank you all for joining us today. If you have any follow-up questions and so forth, as you're working through your day, don't hesitate to reach out to Paul or myself. Again, we feel very good momentum-wise as we move through fourth quarter and into 2022. I think the planning horizon, which was positive when we looked at it six months ago and three months ago, we still feel just as positive for 2022 and beyond as we did then. I'll leave you with that, and thank you very much. The conference has now concluded. Thank you for attending today's presentation. You may now disconnect.