As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce your host, Mr. Steve Swett, Investor Relations. Thank you, Mr. Swett. You may begin. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us for Peakstone Realty Trust's Fourth Quarter 2024 Earnings Call and Webcast. Earlier today, we posted an earnings release, supplemental, and updated investor presentation to the investors' page on our website at www.pkft.com. Please reach out to our investor relations team at ir@pkft.com with any questions. The company will be making forward-looking statements, which include any statements that are not historical facts on today's webcast. Such forward-looking statements are based on expectations that involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially. For further discussion of risks related to our business, please see our annual report on Form 10-K and subsequent filings with the SEC. Additionally, on this call, the company may refer to certain non-GAAP financial measures, such as funds from operations, adjusted funds from operations, EBITDAre, and normalized EBITDAre. You can find a tabular reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most currently comparable GAAP numbers in the company's filings with the SEC. On the call today are Mike Escalante, CEO and President, and Javier Bitar, CFO. With that, I'll hand the call to Mike. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our call today. The company had an extremely successful fourth quarter and full year, significantly advancing our strategic plan to shift our portfolio towards industrial, with our industrial ABR now comprising nearly 40% of total ABR. Over the course of the year, we acquired a premier 51-property infill industrial outdoor storage, or IOS, portfolio for $490 million. We divested $317 million of non-core assets, including the elimination of the entire Other Segment. We achieved strong leasing activity with favorable leasing spreads, highlighting the strength of our operational capabilities. And we took another pivotal step in strengthening our capital structure with the amendment and extension of our credit facility. We were excited to enter the IOS subsector. IOS properties have a low building-to-land ratio, or low coverage, which maximizes yard space for the display, movement, and storage of materials and equipment. This subsector is characterized by fragmented ownership, significant supply constraints, compelling operating fundamentals, and minimal CapEx requirements. Importantly, IOS assets complement our traditional industrial assets, which include distribution warehouse and light manufacturing properties. These asset types share similar market dynamics, tenant profiles, lease structures, and asset management responsibilities. The premier infill IOS portfolio we acquired in the fourth quarter has a 70% mark-to-market opportunity with the potential to achieve incremental yields as we stabilize the six redevelopment properties. This portfolio significantly enhances the company's growth profile. With substantial opportunities for sustained growth in the IOS subsector and our team's unique IOS expertise, we plan to concentrate our investment strategy on these types of assets, which we believe will drive long-term shareholder value. Turning to our dispositions, I'm very pleased that we achieved our stated goal of disposing of our Other Segment assets by year-end 2024. In the fourth quarter, we sold the remaining 10 assets in that segment, completing this important milestone. For the year, we sold a total of 19 assets for $317 million, including 17 V properties and two Office Segment properties. One of the key reasons our office property dispositions have been so successful is that our office buildings are generally newer vintage, and contain functions that are central to tenant operations. Given these attributes, many of our tenants have expressed interest in purchasing the properties they lease, and we have been successful in closing these types of transactions. In 2024, tenant purchases accounted for approximately 44% of our gross disposition proceeds. As we continue to divest non-core assets in 2025, we will maintain a strong focus on engaging with tenants as potential buyers of our properties. Moving to leasing activity, we had a successful year marked by strong results. We leased a total of approximately 837,000 sq ft with a weighted average lease term of 4.5 years and achieved favorable re-leasing spreads, 32% on a GAAP basis and 23% on a cash basis. Several of these leases were for Other Segment assets that were sold shortly after the leases were completed. In these cases, we strategically structured the leases to maximize potential sales proceeds and minimize out-of-pocket leasing costs incurred prior to the anticipated sale date. Our solid leasing activity for the year highlights our operational expertise and reflects the continued strong demand for our properties in the market. As a result of our acquisition, disposition, and leasing activities in 2024, our portfolio had the following key characteristics at year-end. We owned a total of 103 properties reported in two segments, industrial and office. Our portfolio consisted of 97 operating properties and six redevelopment properties, which are properties we have designated for redevelopment or repositioning. Our operating portfolio includes 64 Industrial Segment properties made up of 45 IOS locations and 19 Traditional Industrial assets. These properties span 18 states, 31 markets, and roughly 58% concentrated in Coastal and Sunbelt markets. Our Industrial Segment ABR now accounts for nearly 40% of our total ABR, up from 25% at the beginning of 2024. Looking at our IOS assets specifically, the 45 IOS properties are approximately 100% leased, with 47% investment-grade tenancy, a WALT of 4.4 years, and a potential 70% mark-to-market opportunity. In our Traditional Industrial assets, our 100% leased, with 58% investment-grade tenancy, a WALT of 6 years, and a potential 24% mark-to-market opportunity. Our operating portfolio also includes 33 Office Segment t properties, which are 99% leased, with 60% investment-grade tenancy, and a WALT of 6.9 years. These buildings are generally newer, with an average age of 12 years, and have minimal near-term capital requirements. This segment has limited near-term rollover, with only 1% of the Office Segment ABR expiring in 2025 and 18% expiring over the next three years. Our redevelopment portfolio consists of six industrial segment IOS assets, encompassing 82 usable acres across four states, with targeted stabilized yields in the 7.5%-8% range. Additional details about our redevelopment properties are provided in our quarterly supplemental. With that, I will turn the call over to Javier, who will review our financial results and capital markets activity. Javier? Thanks, Mike. I'd like to begin by sharing a few highlights of our financial results for the quarter. Total revenue was approximately $58 million, and cash NOI was approximately $48 million. Net income attributable to common shareholders was approximately $12.7 million or $0.35 per share. FFO was approximately $29.2 million or $0.74 per share on a fully diluted basis. AFFO was approximately $25.6 million or $0.65 per share on a fully diluted basis. And same-store cash NOI was approximately $39 million, a 0.4% increase compared to the same quarter last year. Same-store NOI for our industrial segment was primarily impacted by a continuing rent abatement in the 11th year of a pre-existing industrial segment lease, which ended in November 2024, and a one-time reversal of non-tenant reimbursement income. But for these items, same-store cash NOI would have grown by 2.8%. For full year 2024, AFFO was approximately $106.6 million or $2.69 per share on a fully diluted basis, and same-store cash NOI for the overall portfolio was approximately $154.9 million. Moving on to our balance sheet, as of December 31st, total liquidity was approximately $229 million, consisting of cash and available revolver capacity. Our cash balance, excluding restricted cash, was approximately $147 million, and we earned approximately $1.5 million of interest income in the quarter. Available revolver capacity was approximately $82 million. Before reviewing further debt metrics, let me first walk you through the evolution of our debt structure throughout the year. As we began 2024, we focused on strengthening our capital structure, with a key initiative being the successful amendment and extension of our credit facility. During the first half of the year, we further reduced our net debt to normalized EBITDAre from 6.2 x at the start of the year to 5.9 x at the end of the second quarter, and we retained excess cash to manage our operational needs and continue our strategic engagement with our banking partners. In the third quarter, with the assistance of our highly supportive bank group, we executed a beneficial amendment and extension. Through this amendment, among other things, we extended over $750 million of near-term maturity to 2028 and incorporated updated covenants, which facilitate asset dispositions and enable IOS properties to be added to our borrowing base. In connection with this amendment, we entered into new forward-starting floating-to-fixed interest rate swaps with a notional amount of $550 million. These swaps will take effect on the maturity date of our existing $750 million of swaps, which is July 1, 2025. They mature on July 1, 2029, and have the effect of converting SOFR to a weighted average fixed rate of 3.58%. The amendment also resulted in a more favorable valuation of the industrial assets, including IOS, in our borrowing base, and the new swaps assured a competitive interest rate, making this financing both cost-effective and essential for executing our growth and deleveraging strategies. In the fourth quarter, our lenders continued to support our growth plan, allowing us to utilize the accordion feature in our credit facility to secure a new $175 million term loan. The term loan matures in 2028, inclusive of the extension option, and is priced at SOFR plus 175 basis points based on our consolidated leverage at the end of the year. Proceeds from the term loan were utilized to acquire the IOS portfolio Mike mentioned earlier. On the secured debt side, following the sales of the Other Segment assets, we extinguished all associated AIG debt, which had a remaining balance of $183 million. Additionally, we added three separate mortgage loans totaling $110 million at a weighted average interest rate of 5.64%. These loans are secured by our traditional industrial properties, with two maturing in 2029 and one maturing in 2032. As a result of these actions, our year-end debt metrics were as follows, $1.36 billion in total debt outstanding, with $1 billion of unsecured debt on our credit facility and the remainder in non-recourse secured mortgage debt. After deducting cash, our net debt was approximately $1.2 billion, and our net debt to normalized EBITDAre ratio was 7.5x. Including the effect of our interest rate swaps, 82% of our debt was fixed, and our weighted average interest rate for all debt secured and unsecured at year-end was 4.4%. For the fourth quarter, as previously announced, we paid a dividend of $0.225 per common share on January 17th. The Board of Trustees approved a dividend for the first quarter in the amount of $0.225 per common share that is payable on April 17th to holders of record on March 31st. While the company expects to continue paying dividends on a quarterly basis, all future dividend decisions will continue to be made by the Board of Trustees. With that, I will pass the call back to Mike. Thank you, Javier. Looking ahead, we remain focused on maintaining a disciplined approach to our debt levels. Our revolving credit facility provides the flexibility to adjust debt as needed, and we are well-positioned to pay it down through proceeds from non-core asset sales. Additionally, we have the capital flexibility to pursue strategic IOS acquisitions, providing us with a competitive advantage as we seek to expand our portfolio and further improve our growth trajectory. We are confident in our ability to continue driving long-term growth and value creation, and we look forward to another successful year ahead. We will now turn the call over to the operator to take a few questions from analysts. Operator? Thank you. We will now be conducting a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please press start one on your telephone keypad. A confirmation tone will indicate your line is in the question queue. You may press star two if you would like to remove your questions from the queue. For participants using speaker equipment, it may be necessary to pick up your handset before pressing the star keys. One moment, please, while we poll for questions. The first question comes from the line of Farrell Granath with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Hi, good evening. Thank you for taking my questions. I first wanted to get a few comments on your appetite when looking forward at acquisitions in either having a mix of the IOS or Traditional Industrial-type properties that you already have in your portfolio. Is there one way that you're leaning, and also, what type of price differential or competition are you also seeing in the market? Thanks for joining us, Farrell. It's good to hear you. So as we sit here today, the mix that we find most compelling is really related to IOS. While IOS cap rates have, I would say, come closer to traditional industrial, they certainly are still, there's still a gap in there. And then I think when you look overall at the embedded growth in the IOS portfolios, we're finding that there's just a better dynamic going on there. So for the moment, overall, we're saying that we're investing in industrial, but primarily our focus is on the IOS assets. Okay, thank you, and also just following up on your comment about capital recycling and the focus on the office portfolio. I was curious if you are receiving any direct inbounds and you're seeing any further appetite, especially as news around office has turned a little bit lighter? By lighter, you mean better? Yes. Okay. Yeah, I think one of the themes that we're seeing, I guess there's two themes that are out there. What we're finding in terms of interest is really at the local level. Local sharpshooters, specialists in a specific location that already have a presence in the marketplace, are finding prices today to be very much of an appeal to them. And then I think the second thing that we're seeing, and if you look at what we were able to do in the last year, I think 44% of our gross proceeds came from existing tenants and/or tenants who were coming in as users to take over property. So there's an arbitrage that exists in terms of the credit cost to the types of tenants that we have, which are Fortune 500 tenants of larger, more creditworthy tenants. They have an ability to finance the projects at a significant differential to the investors or traditional investors, institutional investors. I would say those are the two themes. I think everyone is largely hopeful with a significant, at least publicized, return to office that the demand side is going to come back there. Great, and just one more from me. Just kind of thinking more on the internal growth side, I noticed that, and you made a few comments about lease expirations coming up more in 2026 and further out years, is there a key focus more on being able to push the rates on lease escalators going forward and any new lease renewals? And how are those negotiations going? So as we identified in our acquisition of the IOS portfolio, we have five opportunities in the redevelopment subsegment, if you will, where we are actively out repositioning those assets in some way, shape, or form, and the leasing activity has been quite good. The sixth asset is a ground-up redevelopment, so that's sort of a different animal. But I think that, along with some of the discussions that we have with our existing tenants who have some lease expirations coming up in the next couple of years, I think we're pretty excited about what we're seeing on both ends, just in terms of the uplift in rents anomaly and then also the embedded growth rate within the lease term itself. So stay tuned. We've got a lot of work ahead of us, but most of our projects are underway and definitely in the marketplace and a lot of interest for those properties. Great. Thank you so much. And congratulations on the quarter. Thanks, Farrell. Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Michael Goldsmith with UBS. Please go ahead. Good afternoon. Thanks a lot for taking my question. First question relates to the proceeds from the sale of the Other Segment. How should we think about how you're going to be using this? Seems like the comments from the press release indicate you could be using it to pay down debt or to make targeted IOS investments, just trying to get a little bit more color at how you guys are thinking about debt repayment versus continued investment. Thanks. Hi, Michael. Javier. The majority, or almost two-thirds of the proceeds from the sales, were dedicated to pay off the AIG debt. So we're fully extinguished there. And there was also one smaller loan of approximately $11 million that got paid off as part of the sales proceeds there. The balance, it did go to increase our cash balance year-over-year and really, on a net debt basis, improved our leverage lately, even though, as you saw in the filings, we levered up a bit for the acquisition itself. But we'll continue to focus on leverage. We did complete the second quarter down to 5.9 x. We're up to 7.5 x as a result of the acquisition. So we'll really look at proceeds from sales going forward on a balanced approach, looking at leverage and strengthening the balance sheet and also focused on growth. Thanks for that. As a follow-up, it sounds like you're continuing to look at divesting non-core assets. Do you define non-core assets as the office assets, or does that also include some of the traditional industrial assets as well? Yeah, I think, by the way, thanks for joining us, Michael, and appreciate you picking us up in coverage. I think from our perspective, certainly, really our approach is maximizing value, and I think in today's world, when you look at the returns that are coming out of office, the rollover exposure and the CapEx exposure, those sorts of things put a pretty heavy weight on office, so from that perspective, I think that that would be the larger component of our non-core asset pool, if you will. Got it. And maybe just one last one for me. 10% of your industrial ABR is set to expire in 2026. Do you just have a sense of how likely tenants are to renew? Are you starting to have those conversations, and what are those conversations like with your current tenants? Thanks. Yeah, we don't really have—we probably don't have enough rollover to get the growth that we want to see, but we have been in discussion relative to the exposure there. And so far, everything we're hearing has been positive, but it's still a little bit early. Not quite. We're not quite there in terms of timing. Great. Thank you very much. Good luck in 2025. Thanks, Michael. Thank you, Michael. Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Anthony Hau with Truist Securities. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Congrats on selling the Other Segment, and you guys have done a fantastic job in 2024. Just one quick question for you, Javier. You mentioned that two-thirds of the proceeds from the sale of the Other Segment went towards paying down the AIG loan, right? But when I checked the supplemental in the third quarter, the AIG loan had an outstanding balance of $183 million. Just curious, can you help me bridge the gap? Yeah, I think I just said generally two-thirds. The balance was $183 million at the end of the third quarter, but if you look at the beginning of the year, I think we were in the $200 million range. I believe it was. I think we started in the $212 million range. Gotcha. But you mentioned that two-thirds of the $190 million went towards paying down the AIG loan. So how did it go from—I thought it would be—yeah. I'm sorry. Of the $317 million total sales proceeds for the year. That's what I meant to say. Gotcha. Okay. That makes a lot more sense. Okay. And then last question. Sorry about that. No worries. What do you think you guys, I think you're net at the EBITDA right now, like net sevens. What do you guys want it to be by year-end? I think we've quoted since the time that we listed that we would be aiming for a six to one ratio. And last year is evidence of that. We got down to 5.9. I think if you look back, Anthony, at everything that we've done really before listing and leading right up to the end of this year, I mean, we've sold over $2 billion of assets in the last two years. We exited the joint venture, the office joint venture, and then we've completed the sale of the Other Segment s. We've really pushed. At the same time, we've moved the percentage of the ABR that's attached to industrial, as we indicated. So I think we have a proven track record of reducing leverage. Nothing's going to be linear, but our eye is on the ball to, in essence, balance very effectively continued growth with a deleveraging. I think we have all the tools in the tool drawer to do it, and you've seen us have a commitment to deliver on that type of number, so. Okay. And just one last question. Have you guys started marketing the office portfolio? And just curious, what are you seeing in terms of buyer's demand or interest in those assets? Yeah. I mean, we have properties that are on the market, and we have properties that are just getting inbound inquiries. I would say that we feel, we've talked about this in the past on these calls and in person. I don't know what this year is going to bring us, but I think, as Farrell referred to it, it feels more positive than it has in the past. I don't know that we're going to see portfolio buyers necessarily. The debt markets are still a little bit jaundiced. I think most of the CMBS offerings on a conduit basis will allow something in the 10%, which was sort of the norm last year. I heard a quote in the last couple of days from somebody that said that maybe that's pushing up to 20%. So there is some sort of loosening going on the debt side, and I think that will push forth into the demand for buyers going forward if that effect holds. Thank you. Thank you. This concludes today's teleconference. You may disconnect your lines at this time. Thank you for your participation.