Greetings, and welcome to the Plug Power Business Update call. At this time, all participants are in listen-only mode. A question and answer session will follow the formal presentation. All questions will be taken over the webcast platform, and you may ask a question at any time by typing it into the Ask a Question feature on your screen. If anyone should require operator assistance, please press star zero on your telephone keypad. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It's now my pleasure to turn the call over to Teal Hoyos. Please go ahead. Thank you. This call will include forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements contain projections of our future results of operations, of our financial position, or other forward-looking information. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the Safe Harbor Provisions for forward-looking statements contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to investors. However, investors are cautioned not to unduly rely on forward-looking statements, and such statements should not be read or understood as a guarantee of future performance or results. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or performance to differ materially from those discussed as a result of various factors, including but not limited to, risks and uncertainties discussed under Item 1A, Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, or quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ending March 31, 2025, June 30, 2025, and September 30, 2025, as well as other reports we file from time to time with the SEC. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the day in which the statements are made, and we do not undertake or intend to update forward-looking statements after this call or as a result of new information. At this point, I would like to turn the call over to Plug's CEO, Andy Marsh. Well, good morning, everyone, and good afternoon to those in Europe, and good evening to those in Asia. I want to thank you for joining the call today. You can put questions in the portal. I think, we've explained that earlier. Look, I'll take business questions today. You know, business questions, you know, I can't comment on the fourth quarter, but I'll be happy to comment on many other items. I also want to talk about the vote, and especially Proposal 2, which is the increase in number of authorized shares. You know, I'd like to start off when it comes to Proposal 2. I want to thank those who voted yes. If you know someone who's a shareholder who hasn't voted yet or voted no, any help you can to persuade them to go vote, I greatly appreciate it. For those who voted no or abstain, who are on this call, thank you for joining the call and listening to our message. Now, I want to be kind of really clear about the increase in authorized shares. If you vote no on Proposition two, you are still voting for an increase in authorized shares as well as a Reverse Stock Split. If you vote yes, you're only voting for an increase in the number of authorized shares. An increase in authorized shares doesn't mean we're going to issue those shares. Those shares are in place, you know, to help grow the business if needed, for example, with maybe a merger or an acquisition, which shareholders would get a vote on. As I think many of you know, we've taken some pretty significant steps with Project Quantum Leap to really drive down our cash burn, as well as monetization of our electricity rights, the data centers. I think, you know, I really want to be clear to you, authorizing shares and issuing shares are completely different. Look, I put out a blog this morning. You know, regardless of whether it mathematically makes sense or logical, you know, the outcome of Reverse Stock Split is a decrease in the stock price. I think some of the pressure on the stock since last Thursday, probably people emotionally believing we're going to do a reverse stock split. But the outreach we're doing is having an impact. The Broadridge was down for voting on Thursday and most of Friday, and we've already seen a 15% reduction in the amount of shares we have to get to vote. So you know, it is having an impact and there's a plan to get there. And you know, I spent a deal of time with our proxy solicitor, with Roberto, who I know many of you know, to really work through how to get the remaining vote, and there is a pathway. May take a... You know, look, we may have Nejirban on Thursday, but, I think that, you know, I think we're going to get there looking at the roadmap. And look, if I didn't think we were going to get there, you know, we wouldn't be working so hard and talking to you so much about it. You know, the success will be beneficial to shareholders, be beneficial to the company. So I really want folks to really think about when they vote, if they vote no or abstain, how they're really voting. And they're voting for an increase in authorized shares, and they're voting for a reverse stock split. If you haven't voted or you'd like to vote, I really would ask you, and I'll give you another run on this later in the call today, to reach out to our proxy solicitor, Sodali & Company, at 833-924-7453. That's 833-924-7453. They can help you. Or you can go to plug@investor.sodali.com, S-O-D-A-L-I.com, to also get information about how to vote. And look, you know, you really can have an impact on making sure this company is successful as we go into the future. So, Teal, happy to take questions, which are up there. Okay. If there are any questions at this time, again, please type them into the ask a question feature on your screen. Once again, all questions today will be taken over the webcast platform, and please type them into the ask a question feature located on your screen. Over to you, Teal, for the Q&A session. Thank you. Okay, and your first question: Why the European shareholders, why are they being excluded from casting the votes? Do you have any update there? So, first and foremost, Plug has nothing to do with preventing European shareholders from voting. Unfortunately... And I'm gonna give you the fortunate part after this, so it's not all unfortunately. But unfortunately, the brokers in Europe charge shareholders to vote, which, you know, seems reminiscent of nineteenth-century times. You know, but, so that is problematic. We are talking to some of the larger brokers in Europe to help facilitate voting and see what the company can do to help. Look, if the European shareholders would vote- could vote, could vote easily, we'd not- we would not be having this call because this would have easily passed. So, you know, we'll put out blogs, and we'll be putting out even press releases to keep European investors informed if we find the pathway to allow you to vote simpler. But it is a challenge. We have some really good ideas that we've worked through with our lawyers and our proxy solicitor. We're feeling confident. So I would ask the European shareholders to stay, stay tuned, and I am so sorry that you have to work through such a difficult process to be able to vote. Andy, a similar question was asked about Asia. Would you give the same answer for Asia shareholders at this time? Tougher. You know, so, I'm probably giving out more information than I should, but, a lot of the shares in Europe are the custodian Citi, and a lot of those shares are out on loan. So even though you're a retail investor in Asia, your shares may be out on loan, and you have no idea they are. And, there isn't really... It is really much more difficult. I see a pathway for Europe. Asia, I haven't heard anything that made me confident that we can help Asian shareholders. But thank you for being shareholders. Andy, another question: How does an investor who already voted and wishes to change their vote accomplish this? Oh, so they actually thank goodness they put this in front of me. You can contact our proxy solicitor, Sodali & Company, at 833-924-7453, or at plug@investor.sodali.com. Now, there's a blog I put out on Friday, and I actually really write these to the... The lawyers don't really like it exactly that I write it like a real person. But, you know, if you look at Friday's vote, at Friday's blog, you can have, you know, for example, if you're with Fidelity, when you vote yes or vote no, they'll, for the remainder of the shares, they'll proportionally vote. So, the impact of your share voting may be much greater than you think. So if you voted no, please reach out to our proxy solicitor and change it to a yes. Teal, let's give a business question. ... business question. Okay, this one has been asked several times, Andy. I think people really care. What is the status of AGA and the FID with AGA? Yeah. So, talked to at AGA last week. So here's... If I was gonna give you a roadmap today, in December, I was in Uzbekistan, and with folks from Abu Dhabi, and who are going to be looking to really help facilitate this deal also. And I believe that one will be the first to go to FID, when I talked to Alfred Benedict. The second one is that there is another project we're looking at in Abu Dhabi, that I believe will be the second, and third will be Australia. I think Australia's probably 2027. I think good chance Uzbekistan will be in the first half. The second half, I think the Abu Dhabi. You know, these are huge, huge projects. If you think about Uzbekistan, it's probably a $10 billion project overall, that these things take time. But, I've been in Uzbekistan. I've seen—I've been to the train line, where products will get delivered. I've been to the—I've been to the land, which is, which will—where the project will be built. I've been to the river, where the water will come from, to provide the feedstock for the electrolyzer. So, lots and lots of work's been done. I've met with the governor in the province. It's a cool project. It's one of the coolest projects in the world, and it'll be used to create SAF and eSAF. So, pretty, pretty excited about all three projects that we're engaged with, with their, our folks there in, in AGA. I'll continue to help Jose on this, on this one. Okay, Andy, if we could go back to the meeting questions. A couple different variations of the next question: Why is increasing authorized shares critical now, and what are the specific uses for the additional shares? Yeah. So, they're critical now is 'cause we have contractual obligations associated with the deal that we did for where we sold warrants, and the company was able to pull in $370 million, as well as the convert deal that we did in November. Both of these have underlying end shares. But let me be really clear, you know, the shares for the deal, which was the warrant sale, you know, they're not going to... They would not be issued until the stock price is above $7.75, based on, you know, the terms of that deal. You know, and look, if they do get exercised, that would bring $1.2 billion into the company. The convert deal is a long-term deal, you know, over seven years, Jerry, I think the right number is? Yes. It's a seven years convert. Those shares aren't coming to the market. And look, you know, usually what happens with converts is that, you know, that deal will probably be redone three, four years from now and for better terms for the company, and, I would not expect to be seeing those shares in the market. But there are contractual obligations to make sure those shares are available. Now, if the stock jumps to $10, there's a chance that $7.75 will get exercised, bring $1.2 billion to the company. So, that's why they need to be there. But, the number of shares which are floating, which people are trading every day, isn't going to change at the end of the month, when the increase in number of authorized shares occurs one way or another. You know, it's just not how it'll work. We have, you know, in the float today, about 1.39 billion. I don't expect that number to dramatically change at all, in the coming months. Now, the other reasons you want shares, you could think about mergers and acquisitions. The company merged with someone and, you know, we're driving the merger, which would go out for vote by shareholders, to the shareholders. We may need shares for that. But, you know, we're looking at... You know, that's why we need authorized shares. You need them to run the business. Okay, Andy, next question: Has Plug engaged large institutional shareholders- Yeah. -on the current proposals? Yeah, absolutely. So, you know, we, you know, the effort we made to, you know, have, especially the, funds which are index funds, in many cases, recall their shares on loan, you know, provided a, a lot of voting power. We would not be here if there wasn't a recall shares that were on loan, and that brought in over 150 million shares. That was a, effort that, you know, between Jerry, myself, our proxy solicitors, was really important to make this possible. Going through the list, there is about 60 million institutional shares which have not been voted yet, and there is, a, you know, very extensive effort going on as we speak for, me to speak, with them this week. You know, doing my math, if we even got a quarter of them to come in, we'll be in pretty good shape. And, not only are we engaged and the proxy solicitors, our bankers I've reached out to and other folks I know, to help get them voted. But I would say that, I think it's fair to say, Jerry, I don't know of one institution who voted no. Right. Every institution who voted, voted yes. ISS and Glass Lewis all voted yes on all three proposals. So, you know, anyone who's kind of studied this, has supported this, and understands the company's needs for authorized shares, understands that if the shares aren't authorized by this proposal two, that we will increase the number of shares with a reverse stock split. So it is clearly understood by institutions that these shares are going to be needed to meet our contractual obligations, and it's why we're doing it now. How about a business question, too? Okay. Andy, can you tell us about the hydrogen economy in the U.S., the success that you've seen in 2025? Yeah. So I'm probably, yeah, more optimistic in general. Now, as many of you know, I've been around this industry for a long time. I've seen the ups, I've seen the downs, but if I really take a look at it, I think the perception that the U.S. hydrogen economy is down isn't really, I think, a fair view of the world. I think if you take a real look at the, you know, bill that passed in July. You know, through 2032, the fuel cell tax credit was the 30% tax credit was included in the bill. That's a big deal. I've developed a great deal of... And that really has helped us with our traditional material handling customers. It's also giving us ideas about how we can move the business into other sectors, which makes it attractive. That bill also provided through 2027 for anything that's constructed a tax credit for generation of hydrogen, and our Georgia plant will have it through 2032. So, I'm not nearly and we have deals floating in the U.S., and I can tell you, Jose and company, Jose'd be with me here today, but he's been working, hanging out with the sales force, and many of the deals are here in the U.S. So I'm not as nearly as negative about the U.S. I think that people at the Department of Energy are serious energy people. I've established a lot of respect for the folks I've dealt with there, and I may not always agree with them, but that's okay. But I don't think, you know, I think when you think about the U.S. being energy dominant, which is the U.S.'s goal, hydrogen matters. Green hydrogen matters because customers around the world want it, and the U.S. is in a better position to do that than most other regions of the world. Maybe in the best position to do that. And the people or the DOE understands the vast advantages the U.S. has in the energy world and want to continue it for the future. Andy, if I can ask a follow-on question to that? Yeah. What milestones have been achieved in scaling Plug's hydrogen production in your U.S. plants? Yeah. I, you know, love the plant in Georgia. When I go there, it's kind of remarkable. And, you know, it cost money to build it. But between there, the site that we did with Olin, which I have to say, lots of the learnings from the first hydrogen plant, we pushed on to the second hydrogen plant in Louisiana. Look, don't expect to do it this year, but we are thinking about the future. And, you know, and not only providing hydrogen and building plants with ourselves and partners, but how you think about, for example, the space industry, when you kind of look at our recent deal with NASA. So, I'm, excited about, where the plants could be. We have some really kind of interesting actual thoughts going on with the plants and maybe data centers and coupling them together. So there's a lot of fascinating work going on to make those plants continue to grow the plants. GenEco is the best-selling tool we have, and I got to remind people that those stacks are made in the premier PEM electrolyzer stack facility in the world, in Rochester. And the systems here in the U.S. are made in our state-of-the-art facility here outside Albany, New York. So, you know, I think the future of the plants for our electrolyzer business, I think where Jose will help take us is really, really exciting. Back to meeting questions? Yeah, Patty, I'll take another. I like those questions better, but go ahead. Meeting questions too. We have a couple more in on the meeting, so, the next question: How many more shares are needed to get number two proposal passed? Yeah. Looks like to me it's below 40 million at the moment. And, you know, I mentioned the institutions, there are 60 million. You know, so, so the last time I looked, 52% of the shares, I think I got that number right, Jerry, have voted. Little over 52. Little over Little over 52%. So there's 48% that haven't voted, which represents, if you do your math quickly, about 670 million shares. So we need about, you know, 38 million of those to vote. The institutions, as I mentioned, I've looked at, have about 60 million shares that we're talking to. You know, if we can crack the European just a bit to make life easier, it'll be really, really good. I have found people who haven't voted, who actually are, you know, who didn't even know they didn't vote. So, you know, so it is important that, you vote, every... As I mentioned, if you, for example, have shares in Fidelity, you know, your vote, vote almost- could almost count twice. So that's kind of the mathematics to get there. Okay, I need another business. Excuse me, meeting question. Yes. If the February fifth meeting is adjourned to provide more time to get the required votes, when is the latest date the special meeting will close for good? I think, if I was gonna say, probably around the sixteenth or seventeenth is probably a, probably a fair date. Okay, and another meeting question: What reverse split amount would be necessary if, unfortunately, proposal 2 is not approved? Yeah. So the minimum, if I say I could do, is a 1-5, which would authorize 1.2 million shares. So you know, that's, that's the minimum. You know, a 10-1 would, a 1-10 would actually free 1.35 billion. So just to let people know, that's kind of the numbers we're talking about today. You know, I, you know, I, I may, you know, it may sound... What's wrong, Jerry? Nothing. Yeah. It, it may sound strange, but, that's really... You know, we have the authority to do that, and we have to do that. I did have a question by someone who questioned, you know, why, why we would do this at this time. And it's really, really clear. The reason we're doing it now is 'cause we have to. We don't have any other choice. So I really, you know, I put out my blog this morning. I really don't want to do a reverse stock split. I think, you know, there's some anticipating a reverse stock split in the market, 'cause that's kind of what you see in the stock over the last couple days. I can tell you that, there is, you know, there is a roadmap here. There's lots of shares to get people to vote. You know, I, you know... I think that Jerry and I, and proxy solicitor, Paul-... We're all taking this as our personal mission to make sure we get votes. Now, I found an employee in the hallway who had about 100,000 shares and didn't vote. So if you haven't voted, please vote. So Paul's sitting here with me also. Paul has about 2 million shares, and he voted right, thank goodness. So, that's kind of where we stand. Another business one, too. Another business one? Yeah. Okay. What gives you confidence Plug can survive and scale long term? Oh, that's not hard. Because, I, I know the landscape. So let's start with a premise. Hydrogen is going to be important to the world. I don't know if it's going to be 10% of world's energy. I don't know if it's going to be 20% of world's energy. But if Europe wants to be energy independent, it's going to need hydrogen. The U.S., if it wants to continue to dominate globally, is going to need hydrogen. The world is going to solar and wind and geothermal and nuclear, and hydrogen plays very well with nuclear, regardless of, you know, how folks may think about this short term. And then, you know, knowing, you know, you know, I know folks pretty well, you know. Folks who are my competitors or friends, folks who, you know, are partners, you know, I'm friendly with. I've seen lots of the world, and I can honestly say, first, no company with fuel cells, next to maybe Toyota and Hyundai, have had the real-world experience that Plug has had. And I would even say, you know, Toyota's never ran an operation 24/7 at minus 25 degrees Celsius and driving out the 25 degrees Celsius. Experience matters, and we've learned so much building our fuel cell products, but actually living with real customers day in, day out. In our electrolyzer business, no one's built more PEM electrolyzers than Plug. And there, we have a unique advantage. By running our own plants, we find out what's good, we find out what's bad, and we make improvements when we find out what's bad. And then, I've been to many factories. No one in the world can match Rochester. No one in the world can match here. This company will remain dominant if we continue to innovate. And I have people like Luke Wetzel, who leads my product development organization, that's, you know, probably. You You know, I worked at Bell Labs, and, folks, some folks on this call may remember what Bell Labs was. But, you know, I've worked with people who I worked with astronauts at Bell Labs that changed the world. And Plug has those kind of folks who will continue to innovate and will continue to innovate working with customers. And if we continue that equation, there's no doubt in my mind we will win this game. And it's why I'm staying on as chairman, because I want to help Jose continue to go out and win this game. And we want to be the winners, let me be clear. And quite honestly, it's one of the reasons that a yes vote on Prop Two and all the propositions really, really help. So you can, you can help us. A strong stock price, and it'll be stronger if you vote yes on Prop Two, as you know, as I outlined in the blog today. Where do you want to go next, Andy? Business question or meeting question? Give me another business. Another business question. Yeah. Okay. What concrete steps are being taken to reduce cash burn and debt? So, I think we knocked down a lot of debt here. That's why we did the convert deal for, to get rid of the term loan and that high interest rate. I think we moved the interest rate, Paul, down from, was it, what? 13%-14%? Yeah, down to, like, 7, yeah. Down to 7. So, on the convert, so we knocked a lot of debt down there. I think, Paul, our cash use probably dramatically reduced by at least 50% last year. Yep. And with Project Quantum Leap, we're seeing improvements in the first three quarters in gross margins. We're seeing increase in revenue. So, we are laser focused to achieve EBITDA break even by the end of 2026. I, you know, I hear Jose pushing people hard towards that goal, and, you know, there is a, a laser focus issue, laser focus on reducing cash burn. But we also have to continue to grow the business because, you know, if you look at the business itself, it's highly leveraged. So, if you-- you highly leverage with sales. More sales covers fixed costs, and, that is why, we have to control expenses, and we have to grow. And also we have to do both because we do want to be the ultimate big winner in this industry. Excellent, Andy. We have a couple meeting questions. Okay. Is that okay? Sure. If we voted yes, do we need to vote again? No. If you voted yes... But if you voted yes, I would ask you to, you know, I have a long-term investor I've spoken to for 18 years, who sent me a list of folks that haven't voted yet. So, if you voted yes, and if you know another shareholder who either voted no or abstained or hasn't voted, please reach out and ask them to vote yes. Okay, Andy, if prop one, proposal one, gets the required votes to pass, does it change the votes needed to pass proposal two, or will the reverse split still have to go through? Yeah. So, so let me take a step back. So the answer to that question is proposal two has to pass for proposal one, regardless of proposal one. But also from a... Now, this is, a little bit, maybe more details, but, proposal two is a routine proposal, and the lawyer, and Jerry's shaking his head yes, that I'm saying it right, and needs 50% +1 vote of all outstanding shares to pass. In that way, on that one, the brokers can vote proportionately. Proposal one is not a routine proposal and requires people to vote in the affirmative, and that's a much, much higher hurdle. So, you know, I don't think that's going to happen. My suspicion is proposal one will also be on the June ballot for the annual shareholders meeting. Look, a strong showing in proposal one actually helps us in many ways with the regulators to maybe make it have another discussion about proposal one with them. Excellent, Andy. The next question, this is a long one- Okay. So bear with me. The company implemented a Series Senior preferred stock with the super voting rights for the July 3, 2025, stockholder meeting to reflect the preference of holders of common stock to vote on the reverse stock split. As a holder of Plug common shares since 2020, my questions are: Why was this not used to reflect the preference of the holders of common stock to vote on the proposal to increase the authorized shares that was also on the July 3 ballot, instead of the reverse stock split, or in addition to reverse stock split proposals? It would have made my life much easier if we would've done that. I've been on the phone with lawyers, Nasdaq, for six months. The reason we didn't just do the reverse stock split... So the common shareholders voted 61% back in July. June, July? July. July, for a reverse stock split. They voted 90, almost 90% for an increase in authorized shares. Because the rules and regulations, we could not use the super preferred for the authorized shares. What we heard, though, was the people who voted, and if you really think about 90- 60, were 50% more people who voted for an increase in authorized shares than voted for a reverse stock split. When the company looked at those numbers, we felt an obligation to the common shareholders to go the extra effort to increase the number of authorized shares. So by having this vote and by pushing so hard, what we're doing is really listening to the will of the voters. If it would've been the other way around, I wouldn't be having this meeting. But that's really what has driven why this is happening. Okay, Andy, just looking through. How about a business question? Yeah. What is the market potential for Plug with data centers? ... So we have been thinking about this a great deal, and there's a roadmap where you could think about a combination of electrolyzers and stationary products. Where a data center, you know, you could actually bring three features to. You could provide power during peak load times on the grid. You could be a, say, at 3:00 A.M., when the grid has extra power, you could be creating hydrogen, and that hydrogen could be used for our customers in material handling, like Walmart and Amazon, or it could be used to power the stationary products during peak time. There's a lot of effort going on, a lot of modeling, a lot of work going on to really think about what the ecosystem at a data center using hydrogen should look like, and how to leverage our unique position, being the largest user of liquid hydrogen, and let me be clear, in the world, bigger than NASA. Oh, we have another meeting question, Andy: How confident are you that we won't need a split in 12 months anyway? Look, I'm not a seer. I feel really confident with the business. You know, look, we have stabilized the business over the past year and continue to grow it. I'm really confident that we're creating value for shareholders and that, you know, if we execute on our plan, and quite honestly, if we execute on 60%-70% of our plan, I am not worried that that's a possibility. And look, you know, voters would have a say, so it would not be something voters wouldn't have a choice to participate in. Because, you know, we're not gonna have a reverse stock split if Proposal 2 passes between now and July 1, when the next shareholder meeting would be. And at that time, the right to do a reverse stock split goes away. So I'm not exactly... worried. I don't expect that. I really believe in our plan. I believe we've taken the right steps with our focus. Quite honestly, it's one of the reasons I feel comfortable stepping back, just to be the Chairman, because I believe the business is well positioned to grow, as the other question that came up, allow us to really be a dominant player in the market. Okay. Just a reminder. And look- Sorry, Andy. If you'd like to ask a question- Yeah. Just type it into the Ask a Question feature on your screen. Back over to you. Oh, thanks. Thanks, Kevin. Kevin, I've been doing this for 18 years, too. Do you have any further questions? Yeah, we have just a couple more, Kevin. Andy, someone asked, since share votes are tied up in other countries, couldn't the court system offer some assistance? I don't know what the court system is. Do you, Jerry? The court. Oh, the court system. The court. The court. Yes. Look, this is February 1. I have to have the authorized shares ready by February 28. You know, I don't think the court system's going to help us. And look, you know, I don't think that's... It's just not at the speed of government and the speed of the business when it comes to activities like this, don't really align. Okay, Andy, it looks like you have gone through your questions. We don't have anything else coming in on the line. So I'm gonna do my pitch one more time. I want to again thank those who voted yes on Proposal Two and Proposal One. And if you voted yes and you know someone who hasn't voted, ask them to vote. And if you know someone who voted no, please try to persuade—or abstain, please try to persuade them that it's in their interest. Because if Proposal Two fails to pass, and I, you know, quite honestly, you know, have a lot of confidence it will, when, you know, when I count votes and know where they're coming from, that we would have to do a reverse stock split. We would increase the number of authorized shares. So by voting for Prop two, you are voting for an increase in authorized shares also, but you're also voting for a reverse stock split. A lot of you told me back in July, you didn't want that, and that's why we continue to talk to you. Made great improvements over the past three or four days, and I expect that I have a pretty aggressive call scheduled today, where I'll be reaching out to people personally and institutions, some retail holders to vote. So please vote. But you also can contact the company's proxy solicitor, Sodali Company, and they'll help you through it. They're really good. I best proxy solicitor I've dealt with, and their number is 833-924-7453. 833-924-7453, and they'll help you. If you don't like talking on the phone, I know a lot of young people don't like talking on the phone, you know, you can actually reach out to them at plug@investor.sodali, S-O-D-A-L-I, dot com. That's plug@investor.sodali.com. Hey, look, thank you for taking the time this morning. Thank you for being Plug shareholders, and I'm sure I'll-- you'll get to hear me again on Thursday. Thanks again. Bye now. Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.