Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Public Storage third quarter 2022 earnings call. At this time, all participants have been placed in a listen only mode, and the floor will be open for your questions following the presentation. If you have a question at that time, please press star one on your telephone keypad. If you wish to remove yourself from the queue, please press star two. It is now my pleasure to turn the floor over to Ryan Burke, Vice President of Investor Relations. Ryan, you may begin. Thank you, Katie. Hello, everyone. Thank you for joining us for a third quarter 2022 earnings call. I'm here with Joe Russell and Tom Boyle. Before we begin, we want to remind you that certain matters discussed during this call may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain economic risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements speak only as of today, November 2nd, 2022, and we assume no obligation to update, revise, or supplement statements that become untrue because of subsequent events. A reconciliation to GAAP of the non-GAAP financial measures we provide on this call is included in our earnings release. You can find our press release, supplement report, SEC reports, and an audio replay of this conference call on our website, publicstorage.com. We do ask that you initially limit yourself to two questions. Of course, after that, feel free to jump in with further questions or follow-ups. With that, I'll turn the call over to Joe. Thank you, Ryan. Good morning, and thank you for joining us. I will highlight our view of 2022 as we head into the last two months of the year, and then Tom will cover more specifics in the quarter. At the beginning of this year, our expectation was we were poised for exceptional earnings growth, which has clearly played through. With that, we raised our outlook on strong NOI performance in same store and non-same store assets, along with continued improvement in ancillary revenue. In total, Core FFO is set to grow by over 20% for the second consecutive year. Looking back on both 2021 and now 2022, we have been particularly advantaged by a number of enduring demand factors that continue to drive historic performance. Customers are drawn to use self-storage even in an environment where some top-line drivers are decelerating, such as home sales and market-to-market migration levels. The appeal and rationale to use storage is still tied to a sensible financial and need-based decision where the cost of shelter, whether you own or rent, has increased dramatically. In addition, our customer survey data points to needing more space at home as the second and elevated driver to use storage. Hybrid work environments, for instance, are proving to be a sustainable reason for additional need for storage. For our business customers, renting a storage unit is a compelling alternative to taking on more expensive, less flexible industrial space. As demand has remained very good, existing customers too are staying longer, giving us the ability to optimize rate increases and occupancy. On a macro basis, new supply of competitive product has been flat to down from peak deliveries in 2019. Nationally, markets have been able to absorb the more subdued pace of new development. Our view is that new development will also be static for the near term as risk levels tied to development have increased, particularly due to city approval time frames, higher component costs, and the dramatic increases in the cost of construction lending. With this said, it has become harder to predict the economic environment we are heading into with record inflation and consensus that a recession is imminent. We are, however, highly confident we have excellent tools to maneuver changing macro conditions. These include the industry-leading 200 million sq ft portfolio of well-located assets in every large-scale market nationally, the most recognized brand in the self-storage industry, cost-efficient online marketing prowess to guide new customers to our platform, a broad and growing base of digital channels to source new customers while improving customer and employee satisfaction, historically high operating margins now above 80% in operational efficiency, a massive non-same store portfolio which continues to grow through acquisitions and development that is now 50 million sq ft with excellent earnings power with over $150 million of additional NOI to come, a well-primed, low leverage and low risk balance sheet with $900 million of cash and no debt expirations through 2023, and finally, the most experienced team in the self-storage sector. Now I'll hand the call over to Tom. Thanks, Joe. We reported Core FFO of $4.13 for the quarter, representing 20.8% growth over the third quarter of 2021. Let's look at the contributors for the quarter. In the same-store, our revenue increased 14.7%. In breaking down the components, realized rents per occupied sq ft were up a strong 17.2%, matching last quarter's performance. Weighted average occupancy declined 2.4%. The moderation in occupancy from June to September represented a return to typical pre-pandemic seasonal occupancy decline of 150 basis points. The strong 14.7% growth moderated slightly from last quarter's 15.9% growth as expected. That said, Los Angeles was again a particularly strong contributor, accelerating from 17% same-store revenue growth in the second quarter to 20% in the third quarter. Now on to expenses. Same-store direct cost of operations were up 77.8% in the quarter. We increased our marketing spend in the quarter compared to last year when we were largely quiet in most of our markets, and we saw good returns on those ad dollars spent. Our strategic initiatives, including operating model transformation resulting from digital investments and LED and solar investments, helped offset a portion of the wage and utility inflation. I note the recent Inflation Reduction Act added incentives for further solar investments as we ramp our own activity to reach over 1,000 properties with solar on our roofs in the coming years. In total, net operating income for the same-store pool was up 17% for the quarter. In addition to the same-store, the lease-up and performance of recently acquired or developed facilities was once again strong, contributing $139 million in NOI for the quarter, up 68%. There is significant growth ahead from this pool of properties, as Joe noted, which is a good segue to our outlook for the remainder of the year. As Joe mentioned, we raised our core FFO outlook for the year by $0.20 at the midpoint or 1.3% to $15.55 from our most recent outlook. The improved outlook is driven by better than expected performance in our same-store pool, continued strong growth from our non-same-store pool, as well as our tenant insurance business. Shifting gears now to our balance sheet, our capital and liquidity position remains rock solid. We have a well-laddered long-term debt profile with limited floating rate exposure and over $4 billion of preferred stock with perpetual fixed distributions. Our leverage of 3.3x net debt and preferred to EBITDA, combined with $900 million of cash on hand at quarter end, puts us in a very strong position heading into 2023. It's our strategy to position ourselves for strong access and cost of capital to invest through cycles. Over the past couple years, we've had the opportunity to use that balance sheet to grow, and we're ready to do it again. With that, turn it back to the operator to open it up for questions. Thank you. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your touchtone phone. You may remove yourself from the queue at any time by pressing star two. Once again, that is star one to ask a question. We will pause a moment to allow questions to queue. Thank you. Our first question will come from Michael Goldsmith with UBS. Your line is now open. Good morning. Good afternoon. Thanks a lot for taking my question. Last year, realized rent growth and same-store rent growth accelerated through the year. Then heading into 2022, perhaps the expectation was that it was gonna decelerate similar to the acceleration. Instead, it's remained very strong. Given these moving pieces and what we're seeing is a start to return to normal seasonality, how should we think about the cadence or trajectory of rent growth and same-store revenue growth going forward? Sure. Good question, Michael. I think you highlighted some of the moving pieces there well. You know, as we came into the year, we were expecting continued strong rate momentum and have been pretty consistent around that, and we've seen that through the first part of the year, paired with more typical seasonal behavior and the occupancy rises and falls that we in the industry see year in and year out, with maybe the exception of the last couple. On the rate growth side, it's really been driven by two factors. One is really strong move-in rent growth over the last several years. You know, we've spoken in the past around some of our strongest markets like Miami and now for us, Los Angeles as well, with rent restrictions no longer in place. That's been a really additive driver. You know, Miami, quarter to date, move-in rents were up 9% again on top of significant growth in prior years. The other side of that is then the existing tenant base, and Joe spoke earlier to the behavior of our existing tenants and the long length of stays that we've experienced over the last several years, and we're sitting now at record length of stays within the portfolio. That's allowed us to send more rental rate increases because there's more long-term tenants and at higher magnitudes because of the overall rent environment, which has led to increased realized rents. This quarter matched last quarter. You know, we have been expecting a moderation through the back half of this year and would anticipate that plays through in the fourth quarter and is clearly embedded in our guidance. Year to date, we've been able to take advantage of that environment and have achieved strong rental rate growth throughout. I guess just, you know, as a follow-up to that is just, you know, given these factors that we have visibility into and then combined with street rate growth, which is, you know, flattish to down, let's say, like, how long do you have visibility into kind of continued elevated realized rent growth just based on these factors and not like a, you know, some of the other things like with a worsening of or any potential worsening of street rates or any of that? Just like, how long do you have visibility into elevated rent growth? I get it. You're asking about 2023 now. You know, looking at what we're experiencing on move-in rent growth, you know, we have seen the moderation in move-in rent growth as we move through the year that we've been anticipating and speaking to. Move-in rent growth, and frankly, move-ins were quite strong in the quarter. We had move-in volumes were up 9%, move-in rates were up 3%. That 3% is clearly a moderation from where we were earlier in the year and would anticipate that to continue to moderate through the fourth quarter. As we look forward from here, you know, our guidance would imply that we will exit the year with revenue growing at, you know, call it 10% ±, which sets us up really well heading into 2023. Recognizing it could be an uncertain environment into 2023, we'll be starting from a period of strength. That's what I'd point you to. That's helpful. Just expenses have been elevated. You have several initiatives to offset the pressure, such as technology to reduce store hours or solar to offset utility costs. Still the gap between the same-store revenue growth and the same-store expense growth is narrowing. How should we think about the gap here, and can they converge if revenue growth moderates and expense growth kind of remains elevated or even accelerate? Yeah. As revenue growth decelerates, you know, we could see a narrowing of that. I'd say, you know, we have tools, and you highlighted some of them from an initiative standpoint that have been frankly underway for a number of years to help mitigate some of the pressures there. You know, heading into 2023, the team will be acutely focused on managing expenses in what's a tough environment. I'm not sure I'd have much to add to that. Thank you very much. Good luck in the fourth quarter. Thanks, Michael. Thank you. Our next question will come from Lizzy Doykan with Bank of America. Your line is now open. Yeah. Hi, good morning over there. Thanks for taking my question. I just wanted to ask about how bad debt trended through the quarter. If you could just give any color around the level of delinquent payment, kind of if that's picked up at all or just anything different from the prior quarter. Sure. Lizzy, yeah, the behavior of our customer base, even from a delinquency standpoint, I think is akin to the elevated and consistent behavior we're seeing from a length of stay. What I mean by that is, you know, the customer base as a whole continues to operate from a delinquency standpoint at nearly historically low levels. It's elevated up somewhat from where we were, say, a year ago, but nowhere close to what we saw, you know, pre-pandemic or what you would consider typical environments. Consumer balance sheets statistically appear to be in decent, if not, surprisingly good shape going into 2023. We're seeing this in a number of different reports that we track relative to some of the banking platforms and other tracking mechanisms tied to the overall health of the consumer. From an unemployment standpoint, you know, we're clearly also seeing, you know, very little disruption, in fact, surprisingly good traction relative to overall employment levels. Holistically, that still just ties back to one of my opening comments, which from a financial and need-based standpoint, storage continues to be a very necessary source of, you know, either relief or needing more space or other reasons that consumers continue to value and pay for on a much more consistent basis, their storage units. Overall, keeping a very close eye on it, but nothing alarming by any means. Okay, thank you. Helpful color. And as for my second question, I wanted to get more commentary around market performance. Particularly with new move-in rate increases since we've seen that we're seeing that growth moderate. Are there specific markets where you've had to to you know back off on rate increases for new move-ins more so than others? And if you could comment on what you know the acceleration we've seen in L.A.'s market and how that's expected to trend going forward, that would be helpful. Yeah, I'll start, and then Tom can give you a little bit more color on some of the specific markets. You know, you mentioned L.A., for instance, very strong growth in that market, and we think that serves us well going into 2023. It's clearly our largest market, and we've been held back now for some period of time, i.e., over three years. We see very good continued rate growth and momentum in that market as we speak. Florida as a whole continues to be still quite strong. We're seeing very good inherent drivers and, you know, good absorption of not only move-in rates, but existing customer rate increases as well. you know, from an overall standpoint, as I mentioned, we're seeing pretty muted new deliveries, so that too has not been an overarching pain point, literally in any of the markets that we operate in. That's a very good thing. It's been a good thing for the sector for the last couple of years, and we don't see that changing in any material fashion going to 2023. Frankly, keeping a close eye on 2024, but not an elevated concern there either. Tom, you can give a little bit more color on, you know, some of the trends otherwise that we're seeing in specific markets. Yeah. I'd say overall, the trends we're seeing in move-in rate generally link up to the markets that are performing the best overall from a revenue standpoint. I already highlighted Miami, which continues to be a strong market. It's not seeing move-in rent growth of 25% or 30% a year any longer, but is up 9% in the quarter, one of our stronger markets. As you'd anticipate, Los Angeles is in a similar ZIP code there. In terms of markets that have seen slower rent growth, again, very consistent with overall performance, you know, I'd highlight San Francisco or New York that while positive on a move-in rent growth year-over-year is a more modest level of growth, call it low single digits. Great. Thank you so much. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question will come from Samir Khanal with Evercore. Your line is now open. Good morning, everyone. Hey, Tom. You guys have done a great job on the expense side. Maybe help us understand how you've been able to sort of keep a lid on expense growth or better manage expenses when many companies are raising expense growth guidance probably across the REIT sector. I guess how much of this is sustainable into next year, you know, your ability to sort of control expenses or manage expenses? Thanks. Samir, I'll give you a couple of general comments, and again, Tom can add more context. You know, it goes back to a number of very intentional investments that we've made, you know, year by year, many of which have been digitally oriented. It's helped us optimize the amount of labor hours, for instance, our second-highest expense costs, you know, in the P&L. It's given us the ability to predict, optimize, and rationalize the amount of labor that is necessary, which has been very positively impacted by another digital tool, which is our eRental platform. Now 55+% of our customer base is choosing that to transact with us. It's a digital experience, obviously. It doesn't require at-the-counter labor, so we can shift some of that, traditional labor, you know, to other, priorities, property to property. That's been a very good optimization tool. It hasn't in any way relieved us of some of the pressure we're seeing from a hourly basis, but it's certainly been a very effective tool to minimize that impact. We're also making strong investments. Tom mentioned, you know, some of the things that we've started to do over the last couple of years with solar. Utilities are under a lot of pressure, market to market. We've got a great opportunity and an accelerated investment going into our solar platform. We have, as I mentioned, 200 million sq ft of assets. That equates to about 150 million sq ft or more of rooftops that are wide open for investments. You know, another thing that, you know, continues to change in the business that we continue to optimize is the amount of remote operations, property to property that makes sense. We've been testing this for the last three years. We've got a fleet of kiosks, for instance, in our portfolio that today is about 200. We're continuing to evaluate that property by property. We're just looking for any and all tools to continue to rationalize the pressure you're speaking to. We've been pleased, and it's certainly playing through in our margins, which this quarter, again, we're over 80%. Tom, you can add any additional color to that. Joe, I think you covered it well. Okay. I guess my second question is, you know, clearly rate growth is still strong here, but tell me if I'm wrong, but when I look at occupancy, you know, it looks like you're at a level of, I mean, maybe even 30- 40 basis points above 2019 here when I look at 3Q. I guess, how should we think about the trade-off or how are you managing between sort of rate growth and occupancy at this time and sort of into next year? Yeah, sure, Samir. Happy to dig into that a little bit. As I highlighted earlier, you know, we did see a typical seasonal decline in occupancy. As we look at occupancy performance, at the end of September, you know, we're about 80-90 basis points over 2019, also over 2018, 2017 performance. This is an area of, you know, revenue maximization we're ultimately seeking to achieve and are comfortable in that at 92%-95% occupancy level, which we spent the entire quarter in, and feel like we have the tools to ultimately maximize and optimize revenue in that zip code. Feel good about where occupancy is today and clearly have had the benefit of being able to push rent both for new customers and existing within that occupancy zip code. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question will come from Smedes Rose with Citi. Your line is now open. Oh, hi. Thank you. I just kind of wanna follow up on that last question. As you look into 2023, and Joe, you mentioned, you know, that I think a lot of people see recession as imminent at this point. Would you expect promotional and kind of marketing spend next year to get back towards kind of pre-pandemic levels? And do you know, just kind of interested in hearing more about, you know, your sort of willingness, I guess, to protect, you know, occupancy, getting more aggressive potentially on the pricing side, if the economy, you know, shows a significant sort of downshift. Yeah, I mean, I'd say stepping back, we certainly have good tools to manage different types of operating environments. I think it's too early to speculate exactly what 2023 will look like, but you know, going back in time, you know, we have used promotional discounts. We've used advertising in a more meaningful way throughout the pandemic and you know, getting to 2020 and 2021, we really didn't need to use things like promotional discounts or advertising because demand was so strong. You know, clearly we could be heading into an environment where that won't be the case. Even in the quarter, we used probably more typical levels of advertising and promotional, even in a strong environment. Thinking about advertising spend in the quarter, we spent about 1.5% of revenue in the quarter, and that's towards the low end of our historical range of call it 1%-3%, where, you know, in 2019, for instance, we were towards the higher end there. On a promotional basis, you know, similarly, last year we were hardly offering any promotions. This year we had very modest promotional discounts in the quarter. About 38% of our customers that moved in in the quarter received promotions. In a typical year, in the third quarter, that's more like 70%. We're still running at levels that give us a lot of tools heading into next year to navigate what could be a recessionary environment, and we'll certainly use those to our advantage in that environment. You know, I'm not sure if that answers the question. Yeah, no, that's helpful. You know, the other thing I just wanted to ask you is, did you see a significant uptick in tenant and insurance claims in Florida in the aftermath of Hurricane Ian, or is there something in your numbers that might be worth calling out around that, or did it not really show up in a meaningful way? Yeah. Yes, Smedes. First of all, you know, fortunately, we did not see a heavy impact from the hurricane itself. Our team did an admirable job on a number of fronts. You know, we closed ±100 properties or so for a period of a few days first and foremost to keep employees and customers in a very safe environment. We were very fortunate, as I mentioned, we only had you know 12-15 properties that had I would call any level of significant impact, mostly flooding related. The property claims are roughly $2 million or so, and then the tenant insurance claims are at this point expected to be about $4 million. You know, statistically, we're dealing with you know plus or minus say 3,000-3,500 units. You know, very small and as I mentioned, fortunate occurrence, you know, for us, relative to where properties are located and the impact. We're clearly seeing, you know, obviously a lot of retooling going on to those areas, you know, for overall recovery, but fortunately not a lot of economic impact to us specifically. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question will come from Ki Bin Kim with Truist. Your line is open. Thanks. Good morning. So can you help describe what the ECRI program looked like in 2022 in terms of level of increases or frequency? How do you think this program might change moving forward in an environment where we're potentially gonna see negative street rates and negative occupancy? Sure, Ki Bin Kim. I'll answer it, and Joe can chime in as well. The way we think about existing tenant rate increases is really around, you know, breaking it into a couple components. One is understanding how our customers are behaving, and we have a wealth of information and testing data going back years, and it's a constant dynamic testing environment that we live through kind of month to month. And that gives us the ability to predict how customers will behave, and how they'll react to different sorts of increases. You know, what we've experienced over the last couple years, and Joe highlighted this earlier, is customers have found a lot of value in our storage units, and that's frankly increased through the pandemic. Length of stays are at record highs, and so the number of tenants eligible to receive an increase have moved higher over the last several years, and they've behaved really well. As we've experienced, you know, now nine months or 10 months through 2022, you know, that consumer base has remained remarkably consistent, i.e., the models are predicting what it is that the customers are gonna react to, and we're seeing very consistent performance. The second component is around when a customer does vacate, what's the cost to replace that tenant? Certainly over the past couple years, the cost to replace that tenant has decreased as move-in demand has been strong, move-in rates have been higher. As we move through 2022, as anticipated, some of that is moderating. I would note, you know, move-in demand continues to be very healthy and as I noted earlier, we had a good move-in quarter with move-in volumes up 9%. Moderating from earlier in the year. That component of the existing tenant rate increase program is likely to result in moderating overall activity as we move forward. That's just one piece of it. As consumers continue to behave well and length of stays are longer, that gives us incremental tools on the other side of the equation in effect. Going to your comments about record lengths of stay, your move-out activity was up 12%. I'm just curious, is the group of customers that are moving out, is that at all different in terms of mix? Meaning are customers that have been in there longer, over a year, moving out to a higher degree than before, or is it pretty consistent? It's pretty consistent. What we've seen is really across the board, you know, depending on, you know, if you slice and dice the tenants by demographies, psychographics, et cetera, you'd see relatively broad-based increases in vacate levels up from the really lows that we experienced in 2020 and 2021. Move-out volumes remain, attractive, frankly, versus pre-pandemic levels. You know, again, both the mix of tenants has moved more favorably, and as you slice and dice that tenant base, they continue to perform well versus pre-pandemic levels, although off last year's really record highs. Okay, thank you. Record lows, depending how you combine. Thanks, Ki Bin Kim. Thank you. Our next question will come from Juan Sanabria with BMO Capital Markets. Your line is now open. Hi. Just hoping to talk about the consumer a little bit. You kind of talked about how occupancy was above pre-COVID levels, so you're in a position of strength, but yet the new street rate growth is kind of low single digits, well below the headline inflation. Just curious on how we should really think about strong demand, limited vacate, higher length of stay, but the street rates being, you know, modest, still positive, but modest despite having record occupancies. It's just a little bit of a, you know, just why would that be the case that you're not able to extract more from street rates? Is there some sort of counterpoint to their ability to pay or price sensitivity that you guys are seeing in the revenue management that's causing that? Yeah. One, maybe I'd highlight, you know, we have had an ability to increase move-in rents through most of the year, and we've had some moderation, as expected, as we moved through the year. I think as we've moved into the fall and into a more seasonal decline in occupancy, we've seen the industry broadly, you know, away from us, lowering their rental rates because they have more inventory. I think that that's to be expected and, you know, we certainly have seen that over the last couple months, which is leading to a different environment than what we saw last year, right, which we didn't see a seasonal decline in occupancy. As you think about the scarcity of inventory, different year-over-year, you're gonna see a different rental rate behavior across the industry, and we've seen that. You know, we're seeing some moderation, and I think, you know, the rest of the industry looking at web scrapes that many of you report are showing some declines as well. The flip side is web visits continue to be strong. You know, our web visits, so as you think about having a little bit more inventory, maybe a little bit more of a seasonal decline in rental rates, the overall demand environment remains healthy. You know, web visits were flat, basically right on top of what was a record year last year, through the third quarter. You know, speaking to the move-in environment and the move-in volumes, certainly performing well through the third quarter is the counterbalance to that rate discussion. Good. Then just for Los Angeles, how much more growth can you capture from bringing existing customers to street rates? I guess how much more juice do you have left for that to continue to accelerate sequentially, or have you kind of gotten back to levels where you would have wanted to be had it not been for those rent restrictions? Yeah. Well, you know, I mentioned, you know, Los Angeles certainly, you know, one of our top performing markets, and we've got more to go there, frankly. I mean, you step back and you think about, not only the fact that we've been handcuffed for three-plus years, it is a market where there's very little, new product coming into the market, very good dynamics relative to inherent deep-seated demand. We've seen a little bit of move-out volume, but it's come right back on the move-in side. Occupancies are still quite strong, and we think we've got good pricing opportunities even going into 2023. This has not ended. Thanks. Just a quick last one. Can you give us any update on the October data, whether it's occupancy or street rates, on how those trended through the end of October? Occupancy, as we look at the end of October, declined a little bit as we'd anticipate as we move through the fall. I think occupancy ended up at 93.8%, or 92.8% rather, at the end of October, down from the 93.3% at the end of September. Again, generally in line with our expectations. Move-in rates for the quarter and move-in volumes. Move-in volumes, again, quite strong. I think move-in volume's up 10%-ish. Move-in rate did decline a couple%, and so that moderation in asking rent, given the seasonality, has played through October as well. Overall, a good move-in month in October as well. Great. Is it down 2%, -2% year-over-year? Yep. Mm-hmm. Yeah, down a couple percent. Okay. Thank you, sir. Thank you. Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one to join the queue. Our next question will come from Spenser Allaway with Green Street. Your line is now open. Thank you. Good morning. Apologies if I missed this, but could you comment on cap rates and what you're seeing in terms of the breadth or volume of assets being marketed today? Sure, Spenser. You know, predictably, this has been a far lighter year as far as sector trading. You know, beginning of the year, we saw a little bit of carryover from you know, the volume that played through in 2021, which obviously was historic. You know, quarter- by- quarter, we've seen you know, the realization set in as interest rates continued to rise and cap rates have adjusted in lockstep. I would tell you that you know, as always, the more stabilized higher profile or more highly desirable stabilized assets are likely gonna trade at a lower cap rate than otherwise. I would tell you you know, year-over-year, we're probably in a zone where cap rates have adjusted by 100 basis points or so. 2021 was an opportune time to be a seller, to command, you know, in many cases, historic valuations with a lot of bidding activity at the table. It's a very different environment today. It doesn't mean that trading has ended because we're still seeing some deals trade. There hasn't been anything close to $1 billion or more come into the market, and I doubt will between now and the end of the year. What we've been able to do is find the same type of asset that we've been very successful integrating in our portfolio, with what we feel is a more compelling investment opportunity where we're inheriting or taking on lease-up opportunity. The $760 million or so that we've transacted on so far this year, average occupancies, you know, hovering around 60% or so. That gives us that upside. The amount of volume needs to continue to grow to really lockstep with what really will basically settle out as a different cap rate environment, but it's cap rates are higher. Okay. That's really helpful. Just given all that commentary and the current economic landscape, I was just wondering if you could walk us through your capital allocation priority list. I mean, you sort of just touched on that, but where do you see the most value creation today as you look across your various growth avenues? Sure. You know, it always starts with development. Our development pipeline is $1 billion now, and it has been, and we still see the inherent opportunity to drive the highest level of value through our development activities, whether it's with ground-up or redevelopment assets. The team's working hard, finding, you know, very strong opportunities to either take down vacant land sites or retool existing properties, whether we own or go in and do a redevelopment on an existing asset of some form. We're still seeing very good returns, and we're keeping the team very busy looking for, even in this environment, an opportunity to do what we can do very differently, which is source deals with fewer competitors at the table. I'll tell you there's been a growing population of owners that are coming to us. Speaking to the risk I noted in my opening comments, it is far riskier to be a developer today than it was one, two, or three years ago. Part of that's been driven by a very, you know, new dynamic, which is much higher construction costs lending, and it's just the availability of it, frankly. On top of that, we've got inflation playing through. If you don't have the mechanisms to bat down some of the very intense, component cost increases, you may find yourself in a very different environment relative to the ultimate return you're gonna see on an asset. Land can be more or less expensive depending on the particular market, but there could be more competition there too. Long story short, more risk at development, but for our own purposes, it's still the highest rate of return that we're seeing from a capital allocation standpoint, and we're very pleased by the deliveries that we put into the market and what we've got going into 2023. Now, as far as acquisitions, again, going right back to my prior comments, we're definitely seeing a different environment relative to the cap rates that are playing through. We are finding good assets still bringing into the portfolio where we can more often than not buy underperforming assets for a variety of reasons, pull them right into the portfolio and get good upside from that. It's been a unique environment for us to go out and find something stabilized that we're just gonna pay a top per square foot value for it because frankly, we can do better things with our own capital by taking other assets that aren't either mature or, you know, have some level of additional upside, and that's been a really good investment opportunity for us, not only with the $5.1 billion that we acquired last year, but, you know, the $760 million that we acquired this year. That's great color. Thank you so much. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Our next question will come from Mike Mueller with JPMorgan. Your line is now open. Yeah. Hi. I guess kind of as a follow-up to the prior question, what are you underwriting for time frames and returns on developments that you're starting today versus, you know, something you would've started a year ago? Sure, Mike. We typically underwrite, and this hasn't changed over the last couple years despite the fact that lease-up has been quite strong. We typically underwrite three-four years to get to stabilized NOI levels. You know, obviously we're in an industry where you start a new property at 0% occupancy, and it takes some time to attract new tenants to that facility and stabilize that tenant base and the ultimate revenue there. Still looking at underwriting three-four years of stabilization. Got it. I guess on Joe's prior comments about cap rates being up 100 basis points, is that applicable to, for, I guess, the value-add acquisitions that you're buying, where you're going in at, you know, 60%-70% leased, low yield, that exit, that ultimate stabilized cap rate? Would you say that that's up about 100% as well for what you're looking at? Yeah. I think it applies, you know, to the overall spectrum of different assets, whether, again, they're in, you know, they're fully stabilized and/or they're in lease-up. I mean, frankly, it's just the, you know, I think, you know, pretty obvious impact from much higher interest rate levels. Got it. Okay. Thanks. Okay. Thanks, Mike. Thank you. Our next question will come from Todd Thomas with KeyBanc Capital. Your line is now open. Hi. Thanks. I wanted to stick with investments. You know, Tom, in your prepared remarks, you mentioned that you're ready to use the balance sheet to grow and that it's well-positioned. You know, just following up on sort of the line of questioning around investments, where you know, it sounds like cap rates are moving higher, what would you look for in terms of acquisitions to become more aggressive and put the balance sheet to work a bit more? And what's the spread like today with the movement that you're seeing in cap rates between stabilized NOI yields on developments and stabilized acquisitions? Yeah, Todd, I'll talk to the first part of your question, and Tom can give you a bit more color on the spreads. You know, the playbook that we have, I would say is similar to what you've seen us do over the last, you know, two years or more, which is to find and unlock opportunities relative to, on the acquisition side, the types of assets that we think we're gonna be much more benefited by bringing in, you know, underperforming assets, putting them in our platform and getting, you know, actually very quick improvement. You've seen that with big scale portfolios that we've taken down. Clearly 2022 has not been an environment where we've seen the bigger, you know, legacy portfolios come into the market. You know, the smaller opportunities are at the table. You know, it takes a little bit more volume obviously to get to that level of investment that we saw in 2021. You know, the team's working really hard. We're open for business. We see compelling reasons to go into a variety of different markets where we can additively put assets into the platform, integrate them very quickly, and see that upside. On development, again, it's as broad-based as acquisitions is, meaning that, you know, we've got 50+ properties in our pipeline right now in all parts of the United States. We've got a deep-seated team. We're looking for, you know, very good, well-located sites, and we're gonna continue to find good capital allocation opportunities through that platform as well. The investment arena tied to acquisitions, you know, is far less predictable than, you know, because development's much more intentional, obviously. We're ready. We've got the balance sheet well primed. We'll see how things change going into environment where we may or may not be in this imminent recession. That too can present different opportunities that I think we're very well seated to go out and use our balance sheet to grow the portfolio, just as Tom indicated. Yeah. Then Todd, your question around, you know, clearly the debt markets have been moving. I think taking a step back, we're looking at the real estate itself and underwriting the cash flow profile associated with that real estate. We have more and more tools each year to do so, you know, thinking about certainly what we think we can stabilize a property at, but then also thinking about what the growth profile is in submarkets. It depends, you know, asset to asset, submarket to submarket. We use the tools that our data science team has developed around predictive analytics for rent growth, and that all factors into that cash flow profile. On an unlevered basis, we'll also look at replacement costs and what's the basis that we're achieving with the asset as well. All of those go into the mix and certainly a range there. On the cost of capital front, no question, debt costs have moved higher. We do find ourselves in a place where we have on a relative basis versus the industry, attractive both cost and access to capital. While the spreads have come down, certainly on a levered basis, we're looking at the acquisitions that we're purchasing in the fourth quarter. We feel very good about the unlevered returns we're gonna achieve and the FFO accretion that we'll achieve in the coming years. How do those unlevered returns or what's the spread look like between the, you know, acquisitions today that you're seeing and what's in the market, relative to what you're developing, right? I think your stabilized yield expectations, you know, the NOI, the future NOI that you were discussing, that you've outlined for us on developments relative to what, you know, market cap rates were, was pretty wide over the last couple of years. You know, my sense is that that's narrowing right now. What's that spread look like today? Yeah. You know, as you think about development, we do underwrite and seek to achieve a higher return on development because of the risk profile and the lease up that we just spoke to, it taking three-four years of lease up there. Ultimately, we're plugging those assets that we've designed, the building, we've designed the unit mix, we've picked the location, and then we're plugging it into the largest and most efficient operating platform in the country. That gives us an ability to achieve strong yields on those development projects. Looking at the yields we've historically targeted, we're looking at 8%+ stabilized yields, and we feel good about those sorts of yields continuing moving forward and the unlevered returns associated with that profile. Okay. Just a quick follow-up on something that you mentioned related to occupancy earlier. I appreciate the color on that you provided on October. But can you talk about the range of occupancy loss that you might expect now throughout the balance of the off-peak rental season through you know the end of the year and really into 2023? I think I heard you say 92%-95% is kinda the right range to think about occupancy. Was that what you were referring to and sort of pointing to in what we should think about, you know, sort of, you know, trough to peak or, you know, peak to trough, you know, going forward at this point? Yeah, I mean, I think generally speaking, that range that I was speaking to is how the company's operated and maximize revenue through the years. I would say there's definitely a difference by market. You know, today, Los Angeles demand remains strong. We obviously hadn't been able to move rental rate increases for some time, so our occupancies are lower year-over-year in Los Angeles. You typically see higher occupancy in a Los Angeles or a San Francisco, given the limited new inventory that's added to those markets on a year-over-year basis, year in and year out. The flip side is some of the Texas markets where you do see more inventory each year, but at the same time, you're seeing very strong population growth to support that. You typically don't see those same levels of occupancy, and so you're not gonna see that level in, say, Houston per se. Ultimately, the revenue team is looking to maximize the revenue of each individual unit, no matter where it is across the country. That's gonna lead to a different price volume discussion depending on where you are. So hopefully that's some context. In terms of, you know, where we'd anticipate heading through the fourth quarter, you know, we've been consistent that we were expecting a more seasonal occupancy decline. We've seen that through the third quarter and expect that to continue through the fourth quarter, obviously, you know, market by market, which would point you down towards that 92% sort of occupancy towards the end of the year. Again, from a year-over-year standpoint, that would be relatively consistent with where we are now and would track consistent to 2019 type levels. Okay, great. Thank you. Sure. Thank you. Our next question will come from Ronald Kamdem with Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open. Hey, sorry, just going back to the marketing, sort of the marketing expenses, and so forth. Maybe can you just a little bit more commentary on if it's market specific, sort of what drove that, year-over-year increases? Thanks. Sure. You know, you're commenting on the year-over-year increase, but I'd say largely we didn't spend in most markets last year. Yeah, there's some big increases on a year-over-year basis coming from, you know, zero or close to zero in many markets last year. Ultimately, the marketing spend is managed dynamically by the same team that prices our units. That's part of the ingredient on maximizing NOI and maximizing revenue. That's managed dynamically in the submarkets. No question, you know, there's some markets that we've supported more than last year, this year. Areas that have more inventory to lease typically will receive more marketing support. You know, I'd say Los Angeles is probably still our lowest marketing spend market per property, given the strong demand dynamics we've seen there in our largest market. Stepping back, like I said earlier, our overall marketing spend for the quarter was about 1.5% of revenue, which is towards the lower end of historical ranges, which, you know, gives us tools heading into next year. When you don't spend much in the prior year or at all in some markets, the year-over-year comparison can look like a big increase. Great, that makes sense. Just my last one would be on just on the ECRIs. Joe, when you sort of take a step back and you look at the portfolio, right, record rents, look at the macro environment, you know, inflation and you know, potentially going into a recession, how do you think about sort of the pricing algorithms there? Is there anything that, you know, the company would consider or think about maybe doing differently? I don't know if it's stress testing or just trying to figure out if the customer or the recommendations may be a little bit different this time versus previous cycles. Like, how do you guys sort of square that circle as you go into next year? You know, that's a great question, and I think that what you just highlighted is core to how we price across for existing tenants as well as for new tenants, which is continuous testing. You know, as I mentioned earlier, we have a wealth of information going back in time as well as in the current time period. We send over 1 million rental rate increases a year. That allows us the ability to do significant testing and holdouts to understand whether consumers are behaving as we anticipate, and how that consumer would behave in a different level of increase, et cetera. That's kind of core to the process and certainly will be heading into 2023 as well. Thanks. Thank you. Thank you. It appears we have no further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the program back over to Ryan Burke for any additional or closing remarks. Thank you, Katie, and thanks to all of you for joining us. Have a good day. Thank you, ladies and gentlemen. This concludes today's event. You may now disconnect.